text
stringlengths
1
1.59M
meta
dict
This is a notice to inform you that the server where your Outlook mailbox resides is scheduled for an outage tonight. Your mailbox will be temporarily unavailable starting anytime after 11pm and may continue to be unavailable until 1 a.m., when all server maintenance work have been completed. Outlook Web Access (OWA) will also be unavailable during this time. Blackberry users: Message delivery may be delayed for a few minutes. If you have any questions, please call the Resolution Center at x31411.
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
Susan: John Malowney would like a copy of this ISDA Master Agreement. Do we usually let the traders have copies (hard or electronic)? If so, we need to make it very clear that this is confidential. Let me know what you think. Thanks. Sara Shackleton Enron North America Corp. 1400 Smith Street, EB 3801a Houston, Texas 77002 713-853-5620 (phone) 713-646-3490 (fax) [email protected] ----- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 05/17/2001 01:02 PM ----- Susan Bailey 05/17/2001 12:41 PM To: Bob Bowen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Laurel Adams/HOU/ECT@ECT, Andrea R Guillen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Larry Joe Hunter/HOU/ECT@ECT, Gordon Heaney/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Janie Aguayo/HOU/ECT@ECT, Diane Anderson/NA/Enron@Enron, Melissa Ann Murphy/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott Tackett/Corp/Enron@Enron, Celeste Cisneros/NA/Enron@Enron, Sharen Cason/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kim S Theriot/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tiffany Williams/NA/Enron@Enron, Dianne Seib/CAL/ECT@ECT, Bianca Ornelas/NA/Enron@Enron, Kimberly Allen/ENRON@enronxgate, Julie Brewer/NA/Enron@Enron, Jean Bell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jason Fischer/NA/Enron@Enron, Jorge A Garcia/NA/Enron@Enron, Kimberly Hundl/Corp/Enron@Enron, Stephanie Piwetz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Melissa Rodriguez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Melinda Whalen/CAL/ECT@ECT, William S Bradford/Enron@EnronXGate, Debbie R Brackett/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tanya Rohauer/Enron@EnronXGate, Brant Reves/Enron@EnronXGate, Russell Diamond/Enron@EnronXGate, Lesli Campbell/Enron@EnronXGate, Wendi LeBrocq/Enron@EnronXGate, Edward Sacks/Enron@EnronXGate, Veronica Espinoza/Enron@EnronXGate, Veronica Gonzalez/Enron@EnronXGate, Paul Radous/Enron@EnronXGate, Jason R Williams/Enron@EnronXGate, Wendy Conwell/NA/Enron@Enron, Darren Vanek/Enron@EnronXGate, Rudwell Johnson/Enron@EnronXGate, Ken Curry/Enron@EnronXGate, Aparna Rajaram/Enron@EnronXGate, Tom Moran/Enron@EnronXGate, Nidia Mendoza/Enron@EnronXGate, Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Carol St Clair/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert Bruce/NA/Enron@Enron, Brent Hendry/NA/Enron@Enron, Mary Cook/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stephanie Panus/NA/Enron@Enron, Cheryl Nelson/NA/Enron@Enron, Francisco Pinto Leite/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Frank Sayre/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Angela Davis/NA/Enron@Enron, Anne C Koehler/HOU/ECT@ECT, Marilyn Colbert/HOU/ECT@ECT, Diane Ellstrom/Enron@EnronXGate, Lynn E Shivers/LON/ECT@ECT, Bill D Hare/HOU/ECT@ect, Leslie Reeves/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jason Moore/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dianne Seib/CAL/ECT@ECT, Samuel Schott/HOU/ECT@ECT, Anthony Campos/HOU/ECT@ECT, Karen Lambert/HOU/ECT@ECT, Frank L Davis/HOU/ECT@ECT, Carrie Southard/LON/ECT@ECT, Bernice Rodriguez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sheri Thomas/HOU/ECT@ECT, Amber Ebow/HOU/ECT@ECT, Melissa Ann Murphy/HOU/ECT@ECT, Linda S Bryan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stacey Richardson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lisa Lees/HOU/ECT@ECT, Georgi Landau/NA/Enron@ENRON, Cheryl Johnson/Corp/Enron@Enron, Stephanie Sever/HOU/ECT@ECT cc: Subject: Louisiana-Pacific Corporation We have received an executed Master Agreement: Type of Contract: ISDA Master Agreement (Multicurrency-Cross Border) Effective Date: May 1, 2001 Enron Entity: Enron North America Corp. Counterparty: Louisiana-Pacific Corporation Transactions Covered: Approved for all products with the exception of: Foreign Exchange Confirming Entity: Enron North America Corp. Governing Law: Texas Copies will be distributed Cordially, Susan S. Bailey Enron North America Corp. 1400 Smith Street, Suite 3806A Houston, Texas 77002 Phone: (713) 853-4737 Fax: (713) 646-3490 E:mail: [email protected]
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
You are right! Sorry about that. From: Tanya Rohauer 05/10/2000 02:32 PM To: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT cc: Rod Nelson/HOU/ECT@ECT Subject: Re: Vitol SA I don' think we ever replaced Aquila with an ISDA. We sent one out, but they then decided to use Utilicorp, right? I'll put Vitol on our list, how high of a legal priority is this? (not high for credit). Thanks Sara Shackleton 05/10/2000 01:24 PM To: Rod Nelson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tanya Rohauer/HOU/ECT@ECT cc: Subject: Vitol SA We recently did about 20 weather trades with Vitol and I "confirmed" these under the 1995 energy price swap master (bad for weather) but incorporated ISDA definitions. I think we should work toward replacing this master with an ISDA to eliminate the problem. We did the same with Aquila which solved the weather problem (and I realize the Aquila is a bigger trading partner than Vitol). Can someone generate credit? Thanks. Sara
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
Looks like $1.25 billion write-off coming from Marlin and Osprey in 4th quarter. Tom -----Original Message----- From: Bryan, Gary Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 11:15 AM To: Martin, Thomas A. Subject: FW: Enron For Sale List -----Original Message----- From: Roberts, Linda Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 11:01 AM To: Quick, Joan; Zivley, Jill T.; Bryan, Gary Subject: FW: Enron For Sale List -----Original Message----- From: O'Toole, Sharon [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 10:08 AM To: 'Blanca Daugherty'; 'Debbie Chance-HM'; 'Diana Naylor Knox'; 'Kevin O'Toole'; Roberts, Linda; 'Martha Senf'; Baden, Pamela; 'Stacy Franz'; Miller, Stephanie; 'Steve McGough' Subject: FW: Enron For Sale List _____ <http://gravitron.chron.com/click.ng/size=12090&subgroup=business&target=businestory&article_id=1133455&time_id=1005813104> HoustonChronicle.com <http://www.houstonchronicle.com> <http://gravitron.chron.com/click.ng/Params.richmedia=yes&size=468x60&subgroup=business&target=businestory> HoustonChronicle.com logo <http://www.chron.com/> HoustonChronicle.com <http://www.chron.com/> Houston4u <http://www.myhouston.com> personal start page <http://www.myhouston.com> _____ Pick a section Home Page Business Classifieds Columnists Comics Community Directory Entertainment Features Health Help Inside Story Marketplace Metropolitan Page 1 News Search Archives Site Map Space Sports Travel Weather Section: Business <http://www.chron.com/content/chronicle/business/index.html> Section: Enron <http://www.chron.com/content/chronicle/special/01/enron/index.html> _____ Current stories in this section: Barlow: Bad checks drive a flood of fraud <http://www.chron.com/cs/CDA/story.hts/business/1133374> OPEC twists Russia's arm for cuts in oil <http://www.chron.com/cs/CDA/story.hts/business/1133467> Enron plans asset sell-off to slash debt <http://www.chron.com/cs/CDA/story.hts/business/1133455> Move to a leaner Enron <http://www.chron.com/cs/CDA/story.hts/business/1133446> Airlines face challenge convincing public to fly again <http://www.chron.com/cs/CDA/story.hts/business/1133420> Metals USA files for bankruptcy <http://www.chron.com/cs/CDA/story.hts/business/1133416> Consumer advocates say fuel cost proposal unfair <http://www.chron.com/cs/CDA/story.hts/business/1133429> Igloo sold to California equity firm <http://www.chron.com/cs/CDA/story.hts/business/1133520> After leak, Treasury tightens procedures on news releases <http://www.chron.com/cs/CDA/story.hts/business/1133521> Estimated energy use by 2020 revised upward <http://www.chron.com/cs/CDA/story.hts/business/1133491> Biotech firm Zonagen at loss pending drug approval <http://www.chron.com/cs/CDA/story.hts/business/1133440> Hewlett-Packard beats expectations <http://www.chron.com/cs/CDA/story.hts/business/1133444> Working@Home <http://www.chron.com/cs/CDA/story.hts/business/1133309> At Home <http://www.chron.com/cs/CDA/story.hts/business/1133331> Fannie Mae chief ready to refinance <http://www.chron.com/cs/CDA/story.hts/business/1133468> Clothier VF cuts jobs, costs <http://www.chron.com/cs/CDA/story.hts/business/1133485> American Express increases layoffs <http://www.chron.com/cs/CDA/story.hts/business/1133488> 7,800 job cuts planned at Citigroup, Banamex <http://www.chron.com/cs/CDA/story.hts/business/1133471> Retail sales up, but economists skeptical <http://www.chron.com/cs/CDA/story.hts/business/1133478> Record jump in retail sales sends sigh of relief, rally through Street <http://www.chron.com/cs/CDA/story.hts/business/1133465> In bid to aid world economy, trade officials reach accord <http://www.chron.com/cs/CDA/story.hts/business/1133462> MGM Mirage slashes payroll by 6,400 <http://www.chron.com/cs/CDA/story.hts/business/1133379> Earnings <http://www.chron.com/cs/CDA/story.hts/business/1133577> Briefs: City and state <http://www.chron.com/cs/CDA/story.hts/business/1133408> Briefs: Nation and world <http://www.chron.com/cs/CDA/story.hts/business/1133508> Briefcase: Anthrax doesn't scare greeting card firms <http://www.chron.com/cs/CDA/story.hts/business/1133711> Printer-friendly format <http://www.chron.com/cs/CDA/printstory.hts/business/1133455> Nov. 15, 2001, 12:15AM Enron plans asset sell-off to slash debt 'We made some very bad investments,' Lay admits By TOM FOWLER Copyright 2001 Houston Chronicle Enron Corp. officials admitted they made serious investment errors in recent years and will step up the pace of selling off those investments, including its broadband services group and some international operations. RESOURCES Check stock quotes. Enter ticker for Enron: ENE Enter ticker for Dynegy: DYN Fractions Decimals Those business units, which are worth as much as $8 billion, could be sold off or spun out over the next year, the company said in a conference call with analysts on Wednesday. That would bring in more cash to pay down debt and trim away money-losing operations. Enron Chief Executive Officer Ken Lay surprised many with a blunt assessment of the company's poor judgment in recent years that led to the rapid implosion of the energy trading giant's reputation and value in the past month. "In hindsight, we made some very bad investments in noncore businesses," Lay said. "The negative impact of these investments has been exacerbated through the extensive use of debt capital both on and off the balance sheet. We fully understand and regret that the combination of these events has resulted in the complete loss of investor confidence." To help make the cuts, the company is breaking its businesses into three groups: those that are the most profitable and part of its core business, such as energy and gas trading; those that are unprofitable and nonessential, such as overseas power plants; and those that have good profit potential in the near future that are under review, such as its steel, pulp and paper-trading operations. The noncore operations will be sold or closed down in an orderly fashion in the next year, said President and Chief Operating Officer Greg Whalley. Those operations under review will be studied to see if they can contribute to the company's bottom line any time soon "These are businesses that have strong prospects and that we feel have good potential, but we'll need to look at each carefully," he said. The company's central businesses of energy and gas trading are not expected to be cut back significantly, Whalley said, and should remain intact until the merger. Despite reports that many employees are leaving those business groups, company officials have said repeatedly that is not the case and that top employees are being retained. A stipulation of the Dynegy-Enron merger agreement prevents Dynegy from recruiting or hiring Enron staff for a certain period, in case the purchase is not completed. The $8 billion in business units that could be sold in the coming year do not include Portland General Electric, the Oregon power company that was already under contract to sell for $2.9 billion next year. Nor do they include about $800 million in asset sales that are expected to close by year's end, Chief Financial Officer Jeff McMahon said. That includes about $250 million for a Brazilian gas distribution business, $266 million for a power plant in Puerto Rico and $332 million for certain offshore energy properties in India. The company did not file a final version of its third-quarter financial statement Wednesday as previously expected but rather said it would be five days late with the document. Enron did, however, share some more details about some of its financing partnerships, including the Marlin and Osprey investment vehicles. Marlin is a vehicle created to acquire Azurix, an Enron unit that owns British water utility Wessex. It has over $900 million of debt that's due in July 2003. McMahon said that if the value of Wessex is 25 percent below its current book value of $2.6 billion when Marlin's debt falls due, this would result in a charge of $650 million against earnings and stockholders' equity for Enron. Osprey was created to acquire energy assets and other assets, and has $2.4 billion of debt that falls due in January 2003. McMahon said that if the Osprey assets were valued at less than 25 percent of their current book value when the debt falls due it would result in a charge of $600 million against earnings and stockholders' equity for Enron. Analysts asked repeatedly if executives were confident that no other surprise liabilities were hiding in the books, referring to the $1 billion in equity write-downs the company reported last quarter due to several off-balance-sheet financing deals, and a restatement of 4 1/2 years of financial statements to include an additional $600 million in losses. McMahon said the company has gone through the books carefully, but he noted that the Securities and Exchange Commission and a special committee of the Enron board of directors were still conducting their own investigations. "Everything we know, you now know," Lay told the analysts. Lay said the fourth-quarter results are expected to be hampered by severance and restructuring costs, however, but couldn't provide more details. He said the company is also seeking an additional $500 million to $1 billion in private equity investments. Return to top Click on banner for more information West Oaks Mall <http://www.chron.com/cs/erop/ad.hts/311462101> Click Here for more information. section F, page 6 Ritz Camera Centers, Inc. <http://www.chron.com/cs/erop/ad.hts/311305901> Big Print Central. section A, page 15 Massin's Office Supply <http://www.chron.com/cs/erop/ad.hts/311310301> Retirement Closing Sale! Everything Must Go!! section A, page 11 ****************************************************************** This email and any files transmitted with it from the ElPaso Corporation are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the sender. ******************************************************************
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
<!doctype html public "-//w3c//dtd html 4.0 transitional//en"> <html> <head> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1"> <meta name="GENERATOR" content="Mozilla/4.76 [en] (Win95; U) [Netscape]"> <title>Untitled</title> </head> <body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFCC33" link="#0000EE" vlink="#551A8B" alink="#FF0000"> <center><b><font size=+1>Have you been considering filing</font></b> <p><b><font size=+3>Bancruptcy?</font></b> <p><b><font size=+1>Don't do it until you read this information</font></b> <p><b><font color="#FF0000"><font size=+1>&nbsp; THE REAL TRUTH ABOUT WHETHER FILING</font></font></b> <br><b><font color="#FF0000"><font size=+1>BANKRUPTCY IS YOUR BEST ALTERNATIVE!</font></font></b> <p><b>You may be shocked by all the phony information that is circulating about the</b> <br><b>pros and cons of bancruptcy (some spread by credit card companies). </b> <p><b><font size=+1>Here is a small sample of the secrets you will learn:</font></b></center> <ul> <center> <li> <b>Discover why bankruptcy may actually improve your credit rating! </b></li></center> </ul> <ul> <center> <li> <b>Learn to Restart your life Completely Debt-Free.</b></li></center> </ul> <ul> <center> <li> <b>Learn when a Chapter 13 is a better choice than a Chapter 7 bankruptcy. </b></li></center> </ul> <ul> <center> <li> <b>How to stop your creditors dead in their tracks! How to immediately stop:</b></li></center> </ul> <center><b><font color="#FF0000"><font size=+1>Foreclosures</font></font></b> <br><b><font color="#FF0000"><font size=+1>Evictions</font></font></b> <br><b><font color="#FF0000"><font size=+1>Wage Garnishments</font></font></b> <br><b><font color="#FF0000"><font size=+1>Seizures</font></font></b> <br><b><font color="#FF0000"><font size=+1>Liens</font></font></b> <br><b><font color="#FF0000"><font size=+1>Creditor lawsuits</font></font></b></center> <ul> <center> <li> <b>Learn to identify when there are better solutions to your financial problems than bankruptcy</b></li></center> </ul> <ul> <center> <li> <b>How to know if you need a lawyer to help you.</b></li></center> </ul> <ul> <center> <li> <b>How to identify which debts ARE eliminated in bankruptcy and which ARE NOT! (Key)</b></li></center> </ul> <ul> <center> <li> <b>What if you charged up your credit card(s) just before filing! (Key)</b></li></center> </ul> <ul> <center> <li> <b>HOW TO SAVE <font color="#FF0000">$1,000</font> OR MORE IN BANKRUPTCY LAWYER FEES</b></li></center> </ul> <center><b><font size=+1>I'm going to reveal two closely guarded secrets of the legal profession:</font></b> <p><b>1) The law does not require that you retain a lawyer to help you file bankruptcy in ANY state.</b> <br><b>2) The vast majority of personal bankruptcy cases are highly routine and could easily be handled</b> <br><b>without paying unnecessary lawyer fees.</b> <br><br><b><font color="#CC0000"><a href="http://www.mymagichost. com/22/bancruptcy/">CLICK HERE TO LEARN MORE!</a></font></b></font> <BR><BR> <center><hr WIDTH="650"> <font face="Arial,Helvetica"><font size=-2>This email was sent to you by Coconut Bay Marketing Services in full compliance with all existing and proposed email legislation.</font></font><BR> <font face="Arial,Helvetica"><font size=-2>You may automatically <a href="http://www.mymagichost.com/remove.html">remove yourself from any future mailings by clicking here</a>. The reply address on this email was active<BR>at the time this email was sent. Coconut Bay Marketing Services, SJO3016 PO Box 025216, Miami, FL 33102 tel:011-506-296-1109</font></font> <hr WIDTH="650"></center></ul></blockquote> </body> </html>
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
All, We had a piece computer equipment that has gone missing. The device is a network hub that looks like the attached picture. It was hooked up to 3 computers over in the area of HR last night about 4:00 pm and was noticed to be missing about 6:00 am this morning. If anybody know where it may have gone please let HR or myself know as soon as possible. Regards Dave LINKSYS EZXS88W ETHERFAST 10/100 8 PORT WORKGROUP SWITCH
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
Attached is the Weekly Report for week ending December 8.
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
Eddie Daniels, Senior Counsel, joined EWS Legal Department on December 7. Eddie will report to Lance Schuler and will be located in EB3837A. Please stop by and welcome Eddie to the department. Janette Elbertson Enron North America Corp. Legal Department - EB3326 Telephone: (713) 853-7906 Fax: (713) 646-2600 [email protected]
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
Chris, Could you please look at this? We are trying to determine if we should pay this or not. It appears we withheld payment from CDWR because of the PX short payment. Do we need to call CDWR and tell them we are not going to pay until we collect from the PX? Amy Clemons keeps talking about an annuity that needs to put in Enpower. Stuart seems to have no idea what to do. In any case, I am not sure what to do with this, can you shed some light on it. Word. -Kit -----Original Message----- From: Gilbert, Scotty Sent: Monday, October 01, 2001 12:49 PM To: Blair, Kit Subject: FW: Nov-Dec 2000 Payments Amy Clemons and Chris have the history of this -----Original Message----- From: Rosman, Stewart Sent: Monday, October 01, 2001 9:27 AM To: Gilbert, Scotty Subject: FW: Nov-Dec 2000 Payments -----Original Message----- From: bwilson [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Monday, September 17, 2001 1:42 PM To: Rosman, Stewart Cc: Jones, Dick; Najera, Edgar Subject: Nov-Dec 2000 Payments Stewart, I would like to come to an agreement on November and December payments. The situation to date re the sharing agreement: CDWR November Profit $1,025,958.32 EPMI Paid CDWR 606,753.73 December Short Pay $ 419,204.59 from EPMI's records Edgar Najera of CDWR invoiced EPMI for $189,148.33 for the month of December 2000. In addition, EPMI owes CDWR $20,500 for 82 MWs x $250/mw for HE 2200 on December 6, 2000. CDWR delivered 275 MWs to EPMI in NP15; EPMI delivered 193 MWs to CDWR in SP15. Total owed CDWR = $209,648.33. What is the status of the December payment at this point? The last phone conversation I had with you you indicated the $209,648.33 did not include any short pay for December. Will you please get back to me and let me know what is needed to complete the November/December transactions? Betty Wilson - CDWR (916) 574-2691
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
According to my calculations, the term needs to go through Feb04. The physical fixed price would be 7.34.
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
FYI Vince ---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 01/12/2001 04:09 PM --------------------------- "Julie" <[email protected]> on 01/11/2001 02:07:20 PM Please respond to "Julie" <[email protected]> To: "VinceJKaminski" <[email protected]> cc: <[email protected]> Subject: update on energy book Vince, ? Just to let you know, the books will be shipped to both you and Rice University tomorrow by express mail, which means the books should arrive within 5 days (depending on customs). ? Rice has purchased 25 books, and I informed them that if they don't sell them all, we will?credit their account?with the amount of unsold copies.? I've asked them to?give you?any extra copies instead of returning them. ? Please find attached the invoice for the 50 books. ? Thanks again, and if you need anything further, please let me know. ? Julie - Enron 224_10_01_01.doc
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
Dot-Com Meltdown...Greenspan and the Fed... HIGHLIGHTS FROM BUSINESS WEEK.COM PLEASE NOTE: Last week we published our yearend special double issue. The next Business Week magazine will be cover-dated January 8, 2001, and will be online Thursday night, December 28, 2000. SEARCH PAST ISSUES OF BW. Free for subscribers only -- FIVE YEARS of Business Week magazine. For more information, go to http://www.businessweek.com/search.htm ______________________________________________________________________ SEARCH BUSINESSWEEK.COM -- Search our ENTIRE SITE for all free content, including Daily Briefing, BW e.biz, frontier, and Best B-Schools. You'll find our search function in the light-blue bar at the top of nearly every screen on the site ______________________________________________________________________ DAILY BRIEFING [http://www.businessweek.com/today.htm] 12/19 -- Special Report -- After the Meltdown: Crawling from the Dot-Com Wreckage Yes, the carnage will get worse. But survivors -- and a healthier overall climate -- will ultimately emerge. Here's what's next http://www.businessweek.com/bwdaily/dnflash/dec2000/nf20001219_800.htm OTHER MELTDOWN STORIES: Return to Reality in the IPO Market http://www.businessweek.com/bwdaily/dnflash/dec2000/nf20001219_210.htm The New VC Canon Is Caution http://www.businessweek.com/bwdaily/dnflash/dec2000/nf20001219_171.htm 12/20 -- The Fed Has No Time to Dawdle It should have cut rates on Dec. 19. Every month Greenspan waits before acting makes it that much harder to avoid a downturn http://www.businessweek.com/bwdaily/dnflash/dec2000/nf20001220_822.htm 12/20-- Greenspan & Co. Could Pull the Trigger Before Long Though the Fed declined to cut interest rates now, it may not even wait till the next policy meeting to act -- if the stock market keeps falling http://www.businessweek.com/bwdaily/dnflash/dec2000/nf20001220_617.htm 12/18 -- Greenspan's Ace in the Hole: Productivity He still thinks its strong growth will avert a recession. But if the slowing continues, watch for quick rate-cut action http://www.businessweek.com/bwdaily/dnflash/dec2000/nf20001218_169.htm ______________________________________________________________________________ __ e.biz [http://ebiz.businessweek.com] CHECK OUT STORIES FROM Le Monde Interactif 12/21 -- A "Beacon" in the B2B Wasteland webMethods' software lets incompatible computer systems talk to each other -- a neat trick that's keeping its stock above water http://www.businessweek.com/ebiz/0012/es1221.htm 12/19 -- Why Homestore.com Isn't Yet Home Free To cement its lead, the online real estate listings service has bought Move.com and started eRealtor. Still, regulators and resurgent rivals could keep it from the winner's circle http://www.businessweek.com/ebiz/0012/ec1219.htm 12/18 -- Is "the End of Mutual-Fund Dominance" Approaching? Hardly. Predictions that the Web financial-services revolution will knock the vast fund industry for a loop are greatly exaggerated http://www.businessweek.com/ebiz/0012/ep1218.htm 12/15 -- Clicking for Charity Humanitarian sites help spread the holiday cheer by enabling you to make donations while working through your gift list http://www.businessweek.com/ebiz/0012/el1215.htm ________________________________________________________________________ FRONTIER ONLINE [http://frontier.businessweek.com] 12/21 -- Faith in Diversity The holiday season brings an opportunity to inspire employee loyalty by accommodating the needs of Christians, Jews, and Muslims http://www.businessweek.com/smallbiz/content/dec2000/sb20001221_477.htm 12/21 -- The Franchisee Blues A storeowner at odds with his franchisor needs expert advice -- and probably a good lawyer as well http://www.businessweek.com/smallbiz/content/dec2000/sb20001221_624.htm 12/20 -- Buying Trouble with Free ISPs No-fee Internet access was all the rage just a year ago. Now it is becoming an embarrassing liability for companies whose providers go out of business http://www.businessweek.com/smallbiz/content/dec2000/sb20001220_682.htm New from BW Online: The Small Business Rate Report If you're looking for a business loan or trying to understand small companies better, click into BWOL's infographic tour of the small-business credit market. The series of charts includes interest rates, key terms and provisions, and market forecasts. The data is updated periodically based on monthly and quarterly surveys from federal and private sources. http://www.businessweek.com/smallbiz/resources/rate_report/sb_rate_report.htm ALSO, SIGN UP today to receive frontier's new e-mail newsletter for entrepreneurs. It's free. We'll keep you posted on the latest news and information for managers of small companies, plus updates on new features at frontier online and added tips to help you build your company. http://www.businessweek.com/smallbiz/sbreg.htm _____________________________________________________________________ B-SCHOOLS [http://mba.businessweek.com] The World's Leading Resource for the MBA Community Special Report -- After the Meltdown: Dot-Com Dropouts Head Back to Class B-school applications are surging, as e-commerce refugees clamor for business degrees http://www.businessweek.com/bwdaily/dnflash/dec2000/nf20001219_275.htm News Wharton's Bay Area Invasion The elite B-school will open an exec MBA campus in Stanford's and UC-Berkeley's backyard http://www.businessweek.com/bschools/content/originals/bs01214.htm **New** MBA Journals Learning in the Real World Classroom In this new series, six second-year writers report on their summer internships http://www.businessweek.com/bschools/mbajournal/index.htm#secondyear Midterm Reports In this new MBA Journal series, six first-year writers report on the first 10 weeks of B-school http://www.businessweek.com/bschools/mbajournal/index.htm Getting In Admissions Q&A: Erasmus Get the latest on application essays, interviews, and more, from Connie Tai, director of admissions at Erasmus' Rotterdam School of Management http://www.businessweek.com/bschools/content/qanda/rotterdam_aqna_00.htm 2000 Part-time MBA Profiles Business Week Online has expanded its coverage by launching an area focusing on part-time and distance-learning programs. You'll find profiles of 250 programs in the U.S. and around the world, filled with the information you need to make the smartest choice. DIG IN! http://www.businessweek.com/bschools/00pt/ Career Moves Placement Q&A: Maryland Richard Feldman, director of the career management center at the Smith School of Business, discusses the evolving MBA recruiting process http://www.businessweek.com/bschools/content/qanda/bscaqna19.htm Thinking of Relocating? Check out our Cost of Living Search powered by Virtual Relocation at: http://www.businessweek.com/common_frames/bs.htm?/bschools/virtrelo/index.htm _____________________________________________________________________ CAREERS [http://www.businessweek.com/careers/index.html] 12/22 -- Boosting Volunteerism More companies are offering staffers the opportunity to do good deeds -- and believe they'll attract the best people by doing so http://businessweek.com/careers/content/dec2000/ca20001222_660.htm 12/20 -- Leadership's Toll Positive thinking is the best way to cope with work pressures and stay mentally and physically fit. Here, one "recovered" executive's program http://businessweek.com/careers/content/dec2000/ca20001220_300.htm 12/19 -- Less Joy in Job-Hopping Dot-com layoffs, stabilizing salaries, and a greater focus on security, not stock options, have employees looking before they leap http://www.businessweek.com/bwdaily/dnflash/dec2000/nf20001219_366.htm NOTE: BusinessWeek Online (http://www.businessweek.com) and LeadersOnline (http://www.leadersonline.com), the Web unit of executive recruiter Heidrick & Struggles, have published the second issue of LeadersOnline, the companion magazine to their joint Web site (www.businessweek.com/careers/). The December/January issue provides original career information and commentary, plus content from Business Week Online. The joint Business Week Online-LeadersOnline Web site provides a meeting place for middle and upper managers worldwide. The LeadersOnline cover story focuses on "The Comeback Kids" -- People who survive and thrive after dot-com disaster. Other features: Getting Off the Parnership Track; Finding Value in the New Economy. For more information about the BusinessWeek Online/LeadersOnline magazine or Web site contact Andrew Palladino: 212 512-2680. _____________________________________________________________________ Best wishes from everyone at Business Week Online for a safe and happy holiday for all our readers! See you online, Patricia O'Connell [email protected] BW Online The Business Week Online Insider Newsletter is a FREE service provided to Business Week Online readers. If you need to update your email address -- or to remove it from our mailing list, click here: http://newsletters.businessweek.com/Change-Remove/a14109a62891954a2
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
All, Since Friday, Nov. 23, 2001 was a NYMEX holiday this year, we are preparing to remove that specific date from the NYMEX calendar in ERMS. If you have any objections, please contact me immediately. Thanks Karima x57252
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
No wonder the SEC is able to get good recruiting classes. http://www.gomemphis.com/newca/011001/means.htm
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
As Enron finalizes plans for our child care center scheduled to open during the 3rd quarter of next year, we are seeking input on 5 alternative names/concepts for the naming of our center. If you've already given feedback, THANKS! If you have not, please take 5 minutes of your time to stop by EB 49C3 from 11-1 TODAY to give us your opinion. Feel free to bring a friend! FREE cookies will be provided! Please forward this email to any other Enron employees that may want to provide their input on the naming of the center. We look forward to seeing you later today! Regards, Charla
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
Start Date: 3/9/01; HourAhead hour: 6; No ancillary schedules awarded. Variances detected. Variances detected in Generation schedule. Variances detected in Energy Import/Export schedule. LOG MESSAGES: PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final Schedules\2001030906.txt ---- Generation Schedule ---- $$$ Variance found in table tblGEN_SCHEDULE. Details: (Hour: 6 / Preferred: 20.00 / Final: 19.80) TRANS_TYPE: FINAL SC_ID: TOSCO MKT_TYPE: 2 TRANS_DATE: 3/9/01 UNIT_ID: UNCHEM_1_UNIT $$$ Variance found in table tblGEN_SCHEDULE. Details: (Hour: 6 / Preferred: 29.00 / Final: 28.20) TRANS_TYPE: FINAL SC_ID: ARCO MKT_TYPE: 2 TRANS_DATE: 3/9/01 UNIT_ID: CARBGN_6_UNIT 1 $$$ Variance found in table tblGEN_SCHEDULE. Details: (Hour: 6 / Preferred: 45.00 / Final: 43.80) TRANS_TYPE: FINAL SC_ID: DELANO MKT_TYPE: 2 TRANS_DATE: 3/9/01 UNIT_ID: PANDOL_6_UNIT $$$ Variance found in table tblGEN_SCHEDULE. Details: (Hour: 6 / Preferred: 13.00 / Final: 12.60) TRANS_TYPE: FINAL SC_ID: Wheelabrat MKT_TYPE: 2 TRANS_DATE: 3/9/01 UNIT_ID: MARTEL_2_AMFOR ---- Energy Import/Export Schedule ---- $$$ Variance found in table tblINTCHG_IMPEXP. Details: (Hour: 6 / Preferred: 62.00 / Final: 60.40) TRANS_TYPE: FINAL SC_ID: ECTstCA MKT_TYPE: 2 TRANS_DATE: 3/9/01 TIE_POINT: PVERDE_5_DEVERS INTERCHG_ID: EPMI_CISO_5001 ENGY_TYPE: FIRM $$$ Variance found in table tblINTCHG_IMPEXP. Details: (Hour: 6 / Preferred: 63.00 / Final: 61.23) TRANS_TYPE: FINAL SC_ID: ECTstSW MKT_TYPE: 2 TRANS_DATE: 3/9/01 TIE_POINT: PVERDE_5_DEVERS INTERCHG_ID: EPMI_CISO_5000 ENGY_TYPE: FIRM $$$ Variance found in table tblINTCHG_IMPEXP. Details: (Hour: 6 / Preferred: 17.00 / Final: 11.00) TRANS_TYPE: FINAL SC_ID: ECTRT MKT_TYPE: 2 TRANS_DATE: 3/9/01 TIE_POINT: SYLMAR_2_NOB INTERCHG_ID: EPMI_CISO_LUCKY ENGY_TYPE: NFRM
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
Susan, sorry, but I have just found out I won't be able to do lunch today. Sorry for the confusion. Sorry for asking and then backing out. S
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
FYI ----- Forwarded by Aleck Dadson/TOR/ECT on 06/12/2001 03:39 PM ----- Aleck Dadson 06/12/2001 03:29 PM To: Rob Milnthorp/ENRON@enronXgate@ENRON cc: Paul Devries/TOR/ECT@ECT@ENRON Subject: RE: IMO Meeting Highlights Rob, further to your two e-mails regarding the discouraging sentiments expressed at the IMO Board meeting, Garrett and I had a very productive meeting with Tony Dean, the Assistant Deputy Minister and Assistant Secretary of Cabinetand his colleague, Frank Denton, Director, Economic Policy in the Cabinet Office. Dean was identified by Bill Hawkins as a key voice on the electricity file. He is someone I have been trying to see for two months. He was very impressed by Garrett's presentation. His comments were as follows: a) the mood in gov't is changing; b) the political environment several months ago (California, high gas prices, and complaining industrials) made it very difficult for the gov't to be making a decision at that time to move forward with market opening; c) Enron's message has been getting through" very effectively" (his words) ; and d) the political environment has moderated considerably: the differences from California are understood, gas prices have come off, and Pickering is evidently on track. He emphasized that the gov't's announcement on April 23 was "by" May 2002. Rob Milnthorp/ENRON@enronXgate 06/11/2001 12:43 PM To: Aleck Dadson/TOR/ECT@ECT cc: Paul Devries/TOR/ECT@ECT Subject: RE: IMO Meeting Highlights Aleck, re OPG and Pickering - too complicated of a message re Harris meeting. As per Lavo, he wants 5 simple/straightforward and concise messages that we can get accross to Harris. It needs to be short, to the point, concise, and simple. By cc to Paul, Lavo is looking for our first draft TODAY (you and Aleck need to agree on the speaking points - I provided you with my comments already). One further Item re the IMO Meeting that I didnt have time to communcicate to you - At one point in the meeting Guolding stated that if one industrial or one muni is not ready - the market will not open. I lost my mind, and told him that if that is the case, I need to resign as this is a complete waste of time and the market will never open if our CEO is telling the marketplace that one rinky-dink muni can hold the entire market opening hostage. Without doubt, it was the most frustrating/disappointing statement I've seen Guolding/Baillie make - I'm sure Houghton was basking in all his glory after that. I almost want to write a letter specific to guoulding and cc'd to Baillie underlining who ridiculous a position this is for the CEO of the IMO to be taking. -----Original Message----- From: Dadson, Aleck Sent: Friday, June 08, 2001 11:32 AM To: Milnthorp, Rob Cc: Devries, Paul; Hemstock, Robert Subject: Re: IMO Meeting Highlights This message came back to me (too big) - I am resending and will send garrett's paper separately. __________________ Rob, thanks for the comments from the IMO Board meeting. Three points: a) I am not sure what paper the IMO Board members may be referring to. It could be the briefing note re Moving Forward to Market Opening, the briefing note Satisfying the Government's Four Guiding Principles, or the piece on resource adequacy and pricing that Garrett Tripp prepared and that he and I have been delivering to senior people in the government and elsewhere. I attach those three papers in electronic format. b) The briefing notes above (and the material we are preparing for Ken Lay and John Lavorato) address the Pickering A point. The suggestion that market opening is tied to Pickering A doesn't surprise me but is at odds with what Judy Hubert has been telling stakeholders recently. In any event, it is commonly thought that the government may think that Pickering A will improve reliability and stabilize prices. There may, in fact, be another reason. One of our contacts in the Premier's Office has indicated that Farlinger had told Harris that waiting until the return of Pickering was important from the perspective of OPG's financial position. On reflection, Garrett Tripp and I think that the concern likely relates to OPG's obligations under the MPMA - the concern may be a) that OPG may not be able to claim "force majeure" in respect of the Pickering A delay in order to reduce their rebate obligations ( definition of "force majeure" in sec. 2(c) may not be broad enough) or b) that, even if OPG can claim "force majeure", the predetermined "force majeure replacement cost" fixed at the time the MPMA was completed in 1999 may be too low to offset the cost to OPG of securing replacement power in 2001-2002. In other words, OPG is asking the government to intervene in market development/market opening to protect OPG from the terms of the deal (maybe, from OPG's perspective, now a "bad deal") that OPG made in 1999. We should discuss whether Lay and Lavorato can make this point to Harris (without compromising our source). c) With respect to Foward Markets , I think we have to distinguish between a binding hour ahead and day ahead market which we may want to have the IMO run (assuming that this will facilitate and standardize trading among the Northeast ISOs - which is a key objective in the East), but anything beyond that they should stay away from. I will speak to Rob Hemstock and to the folks in Houston who have been working so hard on the RTO development in the Northeast. Did any material get circulated as to what they want to do re forward markets? In any event, I think we should have a demo of Enron Online in Toronto for the IMO Board and OEB. ` << File: Market Opening Doc. feb 26 .doc >> << File: Satisfying the Government's Four Guiding Principles.doc >> Rob Milnthorp/ENRON@enronXgate 06/08/2001 12:11 PM To: Aleck Dadson/TOR/ECT@ECT, Paul Devries/TOR/ECT@ECT cc: Robert Hemstock/ENRON@enronXgate Subject: IMO Meeting Highlights Some Brief Highlights from the 06/07/01 IMO Meeting: - Market opening, without question, is now tied to the bringing back of the 1st pickering unit. Govt is clearly not thinking november but the good news is that they have made some statements locking them into may/02. We should have our own intelligence re Pickering return but Boland told me that March was highly probable. - A number of positive comments re Aleck's paper from board members - Aleck I'm not sure which paper they are referring to - can i get a copy. - Forward Market development - IMO "wants to make this happen". Assessing two candidates. I told the IMO that this is not their mandate and that a conditional forward market exists currently and an unconditional forward market will exist when we have a unconditional market opening date. I talked re Alberta and indicated that the Alberta sponsored forward market was a joke (WattEx) and that Enron and others had done 100's of forward market transactions and the Enron has a visible forward market 24/7. ACTION - We need to develop a position paper on why this should be left to the market place and not some regulated central agency. The IMO should be concerned with creating the right environment to promote an efficient forward market (ie information disclosure, etc). OPG would support this position - we may want to co-author the paper. I believe Hemstock/Davies did some work on this already re Alberta. Let's discuss further.
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
Peggy Banczak called me yesterday to say that the Inter-American Development Bank ("IADB") had indicated its refusal to fund its loan to the appropriate ENE borrower in connection with the Enron-Vitro Monterry Cogeneration Project ("Project") unless the PPA(s) (and construction contracts?), i.e., those contracts to be concluded between Mexican entities and calling for performance in Mexico, be governed by Mexican law. Peggy explained that after long negotiation, ENE had been able to convince Vitro and Cementos Apasco (and other power purchasers/construction companies?) to agree that their contracts be governed by New York law but that despite this great success, IADB now for policy reasons was insisting that those contracts be governed by Mexican law. Peggy and I talked with Rogelio Lopez-Velarde and Peggy subsequently provided me copies of three memoranda dated August 15, September 18 and September 27, 2000, addressed to Peggy and Robert Stephens of Bracewell & Patterson from Rogelio Lopez-Velarde and Amanada Valdez. In the August 15, 2000, memorandum Rogelio and Ms. Valdez analyzed the enforceability of certain of the provisions of the PPA between Enron Energia Industrial de Mexico, S. de R.L. de C.V. and Apasco should that agreement be governed by Mexican law. They recommended certain changes be made if the agreement were to be governed by Mexican law. In the September 18, 2000, memorandum Rogelio and Ms. Valdez gave their opinion on the enforceability of the "Suspension Remedy" contained in Section 13.5 of the PPA. In their memorandum of September 27, 2000, they opined principally that the provision of Section 13.6 of the PPA specifically denying each "Capacity User" the right to terminate the PPA except in the case of a "Producer Event of Default under Section 132(a) (sic) has occurred and the Project has been Abandoned" was unenforceable. I have reviewed the three memoranda but I have not reviewed the PPA nor any of the other underlying Project documents. As Joe Dilg mentioned to you before we undertook last week our limited review of the Enron-Vitro Amparo matter, we are not Mexican lawyers and therefore we cannot opine on the Lopez Velarde, Heftye, Abogados memoranda and opinions referenced above and we cannot opine on how the application of Mexican law to disputes that could arise under agreements the IADB now insists be governed by Mexican law might affect the enforceability of provisions of those agreements or the agreements themselves. I consider the memoranda provided by the Lopez Velarde, Heftye, Abogados firm, however, to be well reasoned and written. As I have not seen the underlying documents, I am not able to determine whether the August 15, 2000, memorandum addresses all of what the drafters characterize as the "Challengeable Clauses" in the PPA in Section I.2.A. My guess is that the form from which the PPA has been developed is a form that ENE has used on other occasions in circumstances that would permit the agreements to be governed by laws of jurisdictions that have experience considering sophisticated commercial disputes at a minimum and perhaps disputes specifically arising under power purchase agreements. If ENE does agree to subject interpretation of the PPA and other affected contracts to Mexican law, it would be worthwhile to again review the PPA and other affected agreements to be absolutely sure that all of the "Challengable Clauses" are identified and either changed in a manner acceptable to ENE to make them enforceable or if not changed that the risks of leaving the provisions "as is" are fully understood and evaluated by ENE. I do have the following specific comments concerning the August 15, 2000, memorandum: 1. If they already have not been made, is it possible still to convince the Mexican counter parties to make the changes Lopez Velarde, Hefty, Abogados have suggested? Based on the Lopez Velarde, Hefty, Abogados memos, it seems to me that ENE, as a condition to agreeing to accept Mexican law as the governing law, would want to negotiate at least the material changes to the PPA suggested by the Lopez Velarde, Heftye, Abogados firm in the memoranda. 2. If it is not possible to negotiate the changes or is possible only to negotiate some of the changes, with respect to the "Discretionary Performance Prohibition" and the "Discretionary Condition Prohibition" outlined in Sections I.1.1 A. and B, would only the specifically applicable Performance or Condition provision be rendered unenforceable or could the PPA in its entirety be deemed unenforceable if either "performance of portions of the PPA [as opposed to performance of the entire agreement] are left to the unilateral discretion of one of the parties." or "compliance with some [as opposed to all] [of the conditions] rests exclusively in the discretion of the obligor..."? Are there any Performance or Condition Prohibitions that individually could be deemed to render unenforceable the entire PPA? If there are a number of Performance or Condition Prohibitions that are not amended, could they in the aggregate be deemed sufficient to render undenforecable the entire PPA? 3. Is there any other Challengable Clause or other clause in the PPA or other affected agreement that without modification to make enforceable should cause ENE not to entier into the PPA or other affected agreement ? 4. Do the Discretionary Performance or Discretionary Condition Prohibitions constitute events of default, even if the party in whose favor they run do not attempt to enforce them, constitute an event of default that would afford the "innocent party" the right to demand rescission of the PPA? I understand that the PPA and the affected contracts all contain dispute resolution provisions that would subject disputes to international arbitration. Assuming that the dispute resolution provisions are not renegotiated, the fact that Mexican law, if agreed as the governing law, will be interpreted by arbitrators and not Mexican courts is a factor that could result in a more independent consideration and resolution of the interpretation and application of Mexican law to disputes that may arise under the contracts. If you have questions or wish to discuss this matter, please call me at 713-758-2518. William H. Weiland ++++++CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE+++++ The information in this email may be confidential and/or privileged. This email is intended to be reviewed by only the individual or organization named above. If you are not the intended recipient or an authorized representative of the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any review, dissemination or copying of this email and its attachments, if any, or the information contained herein is prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify the sender by return email and delete this email from your system. Thank You
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
Jeff FYI - Strong and colorful words from a powerful man. Given Lockyer's abilities, position and and ambition, I would advise building bridges and mending fences while this is still at the taunting stage. He wants your attention. Knowing him, I'd say that a direct and friendly call from you or Ken today, followed by a meeting would go a long way. Kevin 213-926-2626 [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] News Politics Entertainment music , movies , art , TV , restaurants [IMAGE] Business Travel Marketplace jobs , homes , cars , rentals , classifieds [IMAGE] Sports Commentary Shopping [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] California [IMAGE] [IMAGE] TOP STORIES * Bishop Asked to Quit for Defying Church * Wide-Ranging Debate Reveals Much Accord * Limit on New Sea Walls Urged MORE [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] STORIES BY DATE FOR THIS SECTION 5/23 | 5/22 | 5/21 | 5/20 | 5/19 | 5/18 | 5/17 [IMAGE] DAILY SECTIONS Front Page "A" Section California [IMAGE] Business Sports Calendar [IMAGE] So. Cal. Living Editorials,Letters, Op/Ed WEEKLY SECTIONS Health Food [IMAGE] Tech Times [IMAGE] Highway 1 SUNDAY SECTIONS Book Review Opinion Real Estate [IMAGE] Calendar Magazine Travel [IMAGE] TV Times Work Place [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] Marketplace Find a home , car , rental , job , pet , merchandise , boat, plane or RV , classifieds Place an Ad [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] L.A. Times Subscription Services Subscribe , Change of Address , Vacation Stops , Suspend Delivery , College Discount , Gift Subscriptions , Mail Subscriptions , FAQ [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] Print Ads from the Newspaper See this week's ads [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] Print Edition , Orange County , Valley , Ventura County , National , Community Papers [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] Books Columnists Crossword Education Food Health Highway Horoscope Lottery Magazine Obituaries Reading by Real Estate Religion Science So.Cal. Living Special Reports Sunday Opinion Tech Times Times Poll Traffic Weather Workplace SITE MAP [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] SHOP 'TIL YOUR LAPTOP DROPS [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] Shopping [IMAGE] Search Products Stores [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] Wednesday, May 23, 2001 | [IMAGE]Print this story [IMAGE] Lockyer Fires Earthy Attack at Energy Exec By JENIFER WARREN, Times Staff Writer SACRAMENTO--In a dramatic escalation of energy crisis rhetoric, California Atty. Gen. Bill Lockyer this week suggested the chairman of a Houston-based power company should be locked in a prison cell with an amorous, tattooed inmate named Spike. Lockyer, who is investigating whether energy firms have manipulated prices on the wholesale electricity market, made the comment in an interview with the Wall Street Journal that appeared Tuesday. "I would love to personally escort [Enron Corp. Chairman Kenneth] Lay to an 8-by-10 cell that he could share with a tattooed dude who says, 'Hi my name is Spike, honey,' " Lockyer said. Enron spokesman Mark Palmer called the comment "counterproductive rhetoric" that "does not merit a response." But other industry representatives denounced the remark as "outrageous," especially because neither Lockyer's office nor any investigative panel has filed charges against Enron or other companies. "You'd expect that the state's chief legal counsel would file charges first and make public statements second," said Gary Ackerman of the Western Power Trading Forum, an association of energy producers and traders. "We're very disappointed with his choice of words, which don't exactly fit the profile of his office." In an interview Tuesday, Lockyer said he decided to "ratchet up" the commentary to "put [energy companies] on notice" that "we are not afraid of them and have the will to prosecute." "What I'm trying to do is let these economic buccaneers understand that if we catch them, they're going to be prosecuted," Lockyer said. "Just because they're multimillionaires and run big corporations, it doesn't provide them with immunity." The attorney general is investigating whether power company officials tried to maximize profits through illegal manipulation of prices on the wholesale energy market. Several panels, including a state Senate committee and the California Public Utilities Commission, are conducting similar probes. On Tuesday, Lockyer announced that three power companies have agreed to turn over documents subpoenaed months ago by his investigators. The attorney general went to court to obtain the documents after the companies failed to meet a March 19 deadline to hand them over. Lockyer said the forthcoming documents would help his office as it sifts through mountains of evidence in search of possible violations of antitrust or unfair business practice laws. "Evidence is accumulating that certainly infers illegal activity," Lockyer said. "But we need to make sure it's compelling and clear enough that you can convince a jury." Lockyer said he singled out Enron's chairman because the Houston company is the world's largest energy trader. At least one observer found Lockyer's comments refreshingly candid. Harry Snyder, a senior advocate of Consumers Union, said, "Let Lockyer be Lockyer." * * * Times staff writer Dan Morain contributed to this story. Search the archives of the Los Angeles Times for similar stories about: Bill Lockyer , Enron Corp , Kenneth L Lay , Utilitiy Rates , Energy - California , Utilities - California , Electricity . You will not be charged to look for stories, only to retrieve one. News Politics Entertainment music , movies , art , TV , restaurants [IMAGE] Business Travel Marketplace jobs , homes , cars , rentals , classifieds [IMAGE] Sports Commentary Shopping [IMAGE] [IMAGE] Get Copyright Clearance Copyright 2001 Los Angeles Times Click for permission to reprint (PRC# 1.528.2001_000043205) [IMAGE]
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
Jeff, Good to see you in New York last week at the Guggenheim -- I enjoyed your company at the dinner. Lisa Yoho passed on your questions about the Bush Energy Plan and opportunities for EGM, so I thought I'd outline a few from Lisa Jacobson's and my perspective. Many of the recommendations in the Energy Plan are very broad and could take months (if not years) to approve. However, there are certainly a few areas where EGM could find more immediate opportunity, or where we could weigh in to make the longer-term components of the plan beneficial to Enron. Short-term opportunities $2 billion over ten years for Clean Coal Technologies: There may be opportunities to pursue R&D funding, pilot projects, or tax incentives for technologies such as NOx Tech. While the bulk of this money could take several years to approve, there is "clean coal" program money available now for FY 2002, and DOE is already structuring programs for 2003 money. I have already discussed this briefly with the Clean Energy Solutions folks, but we have good contacts at DOE and they are very anxious to work with Enron, as they see us as a company who can help make the most of their R&D money because we are serious about moving technologies to market. Climate Change R&D: Any financial support the government puts toward climate change R&D could likely also be utilized for new generation/control technologies, but this would be a longer-term opportunity. New Source Review (NSR) Reforms - NSR has been an obstacle to constructing new generation, but also a huge thorn in the side of big coal-using utilities who would like to make modifications to keep grandfathered plants alive as long as possible. The Clinton/Browner EPA brought major enforcement lawsuits against a number (Southern, TVA, AEP, Cinergy) and a few have settled (Cinergy, TECO). The Bush Energy Plan asks the EPA and Justice Dept. to look at 1) possible changes to the NSR enforcement lawsuits and 2) longer term changes to NSR regulation -- all in the name of bringing more energy supply on line. The utilities are mounting very aggressive lobbying efforts to change NSR. A DOJ decision on the enforcement could be forthcoming in the short term (summer 2001). In the big picture for Enron, letting the big, coal-using utilities off the hook would not be the best outcome -- enforcement relief only holds benefits for the incumbents and not new entrants in the power development market. But if it happens, we'll make sure the EGM folks have good advance warning so that they can take advantage of any coal trading or technology plays that they might find as a result from these utilities moving forward with plant modifications or capacity increases. Any NSR regulatory changes will be fought over the longer-term (with resistance from environmentalists), and could also likely be addressed in the multipollutant debate -- see below. Long Term Opportunities/Advocacy Multipollutant legislation - A regulatory program that all at once streamlines regulation of NOx, SO2 and mercury as well as provides relief from NSR requirements could be extremely beneficial for EGM's emissions trading and technology businesses (as well as a number of other Enron businesses). Nationwide trading for these pollutants would open up markets and create liquidity far beyond the current programs. Regulatory certainly for generators seeking to upgrade, expand and improve efficiency at power plants could provide incentives for technology and risk management services. Our Environmental Strategies group has developed a multipollutant plan that achieves a number of goals for Enron, including nationwide cap-and-trade for 3 (or even 4, if CO2 is included) pollutants in a way that provides incentives for new technologies, promotes fuel diversity, and has economic safeguards in place. We've structured it to have multiple benefits to Enron, and we are working on getting key Administration and congressional officials to adopt our ideas. We're making progress, but expect this debate to go on for at least a few years. Here are some excerpts from recent slides summarizing our plan, if you're interested. Please let us know if you have any questions - we are happy to work with you and anyone in EGM to take advantage of opportunities in these environmental proposals. Regards, Jeff Keeler Director, Environmental Strategies Enron (202) 466-9157 Cell Phone (203) 464-1541 Lisa Jacobson Manager, Environmental Strategies Enron (202) 466-9176
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
Hey, man, what's up? Have we thought this through practically? ---------------------- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 10/21/99 01:54 PM --------------------------- To: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT cc: Subject: Re: Tiger Thanks for the email update. Sorry to hear you're sick and hope the voice comes back soon. I thought we discussed the l/c issue and agreed that if the l/c defaulted on payment that we would go to cash. The question was timing, i.e. was it 2 days or 5 days before the cash was do in. I have an appointment out of the office at 3pm my time and won't be bale to join the call, but if it helps I can call to follow up when I am free at aroung 5PM my time. Let me know how the call goes. Per Sara Shackleton 10/21/99 01:39 PM To: Per Sekse/NY/ECT@ECT cc: Subject: Tiger Just got your voice mail. I have severe laryngitis and I cannot use my voice today or tomorrow. Sorry. We can e-mail or speak through Marie. Yes, we have a blackline. Marie has finished going through it and I need to review (the lawyers blacklined the latest version over the second blackline so we had to revert to a comparision to the first blackline!). Re: the credit support annex, I believe all is resolved. However, I believe there is still an L/C issue. If there is an L/C default (say the issuer is downgraded), Tiger is insisting that we post cash immediately without the right to post a substitute L/C within two days. I am not absolutely certain of this, but Carol has a 2 pm call with the lawyers and I will listen. I don't know if Tiger responded to our guaranty. I was out sick yesterday. Hope this brings you up to date. SS
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
I think we should do this but should include some comments praising FERC for taking some positive actions and really looking for solutions instead of simply ways to reregulate (thank you again Dan Yergin). From: Joe Hartsoe@ENRON on 03/16/2001 08:03 AM CST To: James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron cc: Alan Comnes/PDX/ECT@ECT, Mary Hain/HOU/ECT@ECT Subject: Re: Project Requires RCR Jim -- Assuming we agree with what WPTF will say, this is superb. Joe James D Steffes 03/16/2001 07:10 AM To: Joe Hartsoe/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Alan Comnes/PDX/ECT@ECT, Mary Hain/HOU/ECT@ECT cc: Subject: Project Requires RCR I think that this makes sense. I'd appreciate your thoughts? Jim ----- Forwarded by James D Steffes/NA/Enron on 03/16/2001 07:14 AM ----- Susan J Mara 03/15/2001 06:20 PM To: Ginger Dernehl/NA/Enron@Enron, James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Harry Kingerski/NA/Enron@Enron, Eric Benson/NA/Enron@ENRON cc: Susan J Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON Subject: Project Requires RCR The following project requires RCR: Project Lead: Susan J Mara Project Name: WPTF Comments on FERC Market Mitigation Plan for CA RCR Title: WPTF Comments on FERC Market Mitigation Plan for CA Proposed Expenditure: $2,300.00 To see more detail on this project, click on the following link >>>
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
----- Forwarded by Taffy Milligan/HOU/ECT on 09/18/2000 02:41 PM ----- Kaye Ellis 09/18/2000 02:20 PM To: Suzanne Adams/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sheri L Cromwell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Gloria Cruz/Corp/Enron@Enron, [email protected]@ECT, Janette Elbertson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Carolyn George/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Jenny Helton/HOU/ECT@ect, Taffy Milligan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Linda J Noske/HOU/ECT@ECT, Pat Radford/HOU/ECT@ECT, Linda J Simmons/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dina Snow/Corp/Enron@Enron, Twanda Sweet/HOU/ECT@ECT, Becky Tlucek/HOU/ECT@ECT, Chaundra Woods/HOU/ECT@ECT, Legal Temp 1/HOU/ECT@ECT cc: Subject: Monterrey, Mexico Office has a Telephone Tie Line Now As of today, the Monterrey, Mexico office has a telephone tie line. Dial 7+152+extension you want to reach. Please forward this information to any of your assignments that call the Monterry office.
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
Vince--shades of Cuiba ---------------------- Forwarded by Doug Leach/HOU/ECT on 08/15/2000 07:53 AM --------------------------- From: Doug Leach on 08/15/2000 07:52 AM To: Douglas S Parsons/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT cc: Marc De La Roche/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bobby Farris/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT Subject: Re: Cairn Gas Purchase Bid You spoke to me once and I gave you my opinions which were contrary to your resultant offer to Cairn. Currently, I have better things to do with my time. Douglas S Parsons@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT 08/15/2000 12:10 AM To: Doug Leach/HOU/ECT@ECT cc: Marc De La Roche/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bobby Farris/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT Subject: Re: Cairn Gas Purchase Bid I talked to Vince after we hung up and his only suggestion was to call Sandeep Kohli. I spoke with Marc and yourself four times on this matter over a 3 day period and given the timing, I put forth a non-binding offer, after discussing it further with Bobby, based on the information I had that appears to position us close to our competitors offers. We haven't committed ourselves and should we be selected for negotiations there are numerous variables to affect the outcome. If you've got any suggestions for a better deal, please advise. Doug Leach@ECT 08/14/2000 07:45 AM To: Douglas S Parsons/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT cc: Marc De La Roche/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bobby Farris/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT Subject: Re: Cairn Gas Purchase Bid I strongly disagree with the pricing and structure of your non-binding offer to Cairn. This reminds me of the debacle in Brazil. You should have contacted Vince Kaminski's research group as we talked about before an offer was made. This is a bad deal. Douglas S Parsons@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT 08/12/2000 01:51 AM To: Doug Leach@ECT, Marc De La Roche@ECT cc: Subject: Cairn Gas Purchase Bid Doug & Marc, FYI, please let me know if you think we're totally off base. I appreciate your help. Regards, Doug ---------------------- Forwarded by Douglas S Parsons/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on 08/12/2000 01:48 AM --------------------------- Douglas S Parsons 08/11/2000 06:24 AM To: Bobby Farris/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT cc: F B Virani/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Ujjwal Dey/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Nilesh Vaishnav/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT Subject: Cairn Gas Purchase Bid Bobby, After meeting with Cairn today in Delhi, my perception is that our offer was received well. They were more open and relaxed then they were on Wed. morning and made several encouraging comments about our price range, (once we talked through the price movements), and the seriousness of our gas related activities on the West Coast of India, in light of the IOC agreement. I think the overall package is attractive to them and no serious objections were raised. We did talk to some extent about the guarantees, but we didn't get too far and they're willing to accept at this point that what's acceptable to the LNG suppliers, should be suitable for their needs. However, they would like to understand the corporate structure and assets of Enron Energy Marketing a little better and I told them I would get back to them on that point. David and Ajay were up in Hazira yesterday looking at some property for their gas treatment facility, which apparently is across the road from pipeline access. While there they went and looked at Shell's proposed LNG site after walking the last 1 km, inaccessible to their 4wd vehicle and not surprisingly found a beach. In summary, here is what we offered on a non-binding basis: Six year production plateau 85% TOP $3.67/MMBtu Net, at a base of $18/bbl Brent, with point of sale at the tail-end of the gas processing plant Floor & Cap of $15.50 - $27.00/bbl Price movement: +/- $1.00/ bbl from the $18/bbl base price (on a 3 mo. rolling average) equals +/- $0.145/MMBtu fixed on a quarterly basis Guarantees: Same protection we're providing the LNG suppliers under the Trust Retention Account I appreciate everyone's help in submitting this offer. Thanks, Doug
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
Happy New Year to all! Don't forget to get registered early for this year's conference. It promises to be the best yet. The fun stuff is already organized and the program looks to be the best that "Trail Boss" Titman has yet produced. Notice the "friendly encouragement" (translation discount in the registration fee) for early registration. The conference info and registration form can be found at http://hsb.baylor.edu/html/martinj/Tff2001/index.htm Happy new year and hope to see you in San Antonio in April! John John D. Martin Carr P. Collins Chair in Finance Finance Department Baylor University PO Box 98004 Waco, TX 76798 254-710-4473 (Office) 254-710-1092 (Fax) [email protected] web: http://hsb.baylor.edu/html/martinj/home.html
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
Attached is the latest on the TW/AOL - Earthlink deal we could scrounge up. Not too much to report, but we are keeping an eye out and will advise as we come across new details. One item of interest: it does look like there will be some form of physical unbundling of the TW network to accomodate Earthlink beyond basic ISP services. This could be a good sign for the deployment of VOD services. Please let me know if you have any further questions or concerns. Best, Scott Marc Hensel 11/22/00 05:35 AM To: Scott Bolton/Enron Communications@Enron Communications cc: Nate Alvord/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Heriberto Murillo/Enron Communications@Enron Communications Subject: Internet & E-commerce World Press Digest Scott, We are very interested in learning more about the Earthlink deal in relation to the Time Warner merger. Is there a way we could access the proposed contract for ISP and Interactive TV services that is being proposed. Is this in the public domain since it will be reviewed by the FTC. We are searching for information on our side as well and calling our contacts at Earthlink, but any information you could find would be greatly appreciated. Thanks MARC __________________________ Marc Hensel Enron Broadband Services 713-853-6578 (office) 713-646-5745 (fax) 713-304-4907 (mobile) [email protected] ----- Forwarded by Marc Hensel/Enron Communications on 11/22/00 07:37 AM ----- [email protected] 11/22/00 04:36 AM To: Marc Hensel/Enron Communications@Enron Communications cc: Subject: Internet & E-commerce World Press Digest Industries - Internet & E-commerce - Text Newsletter a News By E-mail service from FT.com ********************************************************************** WIN A SONY VAIO! http://www.silicon.com/read/ftinter Read the latest ebusiness news on silicon.com. Submit the BEST 'Reader Comment' to WIN a Sony Vaio throughout November: http://www.silicon.com/read/ftinter silicon.com - the who, what, where, when and why of ebusiness ********************************************************************** Time Warner, A.O.L. strike deal with EarthLink Nov 21, 2000, Los Angeles Times. As part of plans to secure approval for its planned merger with Time Warner Inc., American Online Inc. announced yesterday it has agreed a.... http://globalarchive.ft.com/globalarchive/article.html?id=001121006014 Sony plans tracking stock for its internet businesses Nov 21, 2000, The Wall Street Journal . Sony Corp. is planning to issue tracking stocks for its internet business, in a move to raise finance for further expansion of its internet.... http://globalarchive.ft.com/globalarchive/article.html?id=001121004410 Editorial: Keep the name game fair Nov 21, 2000, Los Angeles Times. Surfing the Web may become even more of an adventure after last week's decision by the private Internet Corp. for Assigned Names and Numbers.... http://globalarchive.ft.com/globalarchive/article.html?id=001121006015 Wanadoo and Freeserve are holding preliminary talks (Wanadoo et Freeserve seraient en negociations preliminaires) Nov 22, 2000, La Tribune. Groupe Wanadoo SA, the internet access provider of French telecommunications giant France Telecom, and its British counterpart Freeserve PLC.... http://globalarchive.ft.com/globalarchive/article.html?id=001122002113 Taiwan-based First International to enter mobile commerce industry Nov 22, 2000, Commercial Times (Taiwan). Taiwan-based First International Group plans to enter the mobile commerce industry, which accounts for between 30 per cent and 40 per cent of.... http://globalarchive.ft.com/globalarchive/article.html?id=001122001979 ********************************************************************** The best of the rest of the press http://www.globalarchive.ft.com/search-components/index.jsp ********************************************************************** CUSTOMER SERVICE You are receiving this e-mail because you elected to subscribe to FT.com's News by E-mail service. If you want to receive FT.com articles only, and stop receiving the best of the rest of the press, please visit http://nbe.ft.com/nbe/nbe_unsub.htm?c=netewpd FT.com at - http://www.ft.com gives you the best business news, analysis, company profiles, help with your investments and excellent sports coverage. *********************************************************************** , Copyright The Financial Times Limited 2000. "FT" and "Financial Times" are trademarks of The Financial Times.
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
Let's try again. -----Original Message----- From: Germany, Chris Sent: Wednesday, May 08, 2002 9:26 AM To: '[email protected]''; Brady, Kevin; Barbe, Robin; Kelly, Katherine L. Subject: Lone Star / Cinergy / Apache Hey team, just wanted to let everyone know who to call. Name Number Company Comment Jackie Adams 713-393-6889 Cinergy Handles all the Apache supply nominations. Lisa Hughes 713-393-6884 Cinergy Jackie's backup Chris Germany 713-853-4743 Enron Trader Robin Barbe 713-853-7177 Enron Backup for Chris Kevin Brady 713-853-7750 Enron Enron's Super "North American" Scheduler Thanks.
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
Start Date: 4/19/01; HourAhead hour: 5; No ancillary schedules awarded. No variances detected. LOG MESSAGES: PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final Schedules\2001041905.txt
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
FYI. Thanks. Lynn -----Original Message----- From: McDaniel, Janet Sent: Tuesday, July 03, 2001 3:45 PM To: Blair, Lynn Subject: RE: Astro Tickets Lynn, I will be using the tickets for Friday, July 13. C. J. Barrera and Ted Kleen from Conoco will be our guests. I have invited Scott Hibbard to go also since he has not met the Conoco crew yet. Thanks, Janet -----Original Message----- From: Blair, Lynn Sent: Monday, July 02, 2001 4:29 PM To: McEvoy, Christine; McDaniel, Janet Cc: Blair, Lynn Subject: FW: Astro Tickets Janet and Christine, I need: Which date each of you want: Who you are taking (name) Company Name they are representing Thanks. Lynn -----Original Message----- From: Blair, Lynn Sent: Thursday, June 28, 2001 2:03 PM To: Aldinger, William; Collins, Marion; Coon, Galen; Cooper, Tim; Cramer, Lanny; Howard, Jack; Laferla, Lynda (Schoolcraft); Phillips, Mary; Rivers, Cynthia; Blair, Jean; Bryan, Randy; Callans, Nancy; Carr, James; Clapper, Karen; Perry, Katherine; Porter, Diana; Walden, Shirley; Washington, Kathy; Wilkens, Jerry; Adams, Jean; Benningfield, Robert; Dykes, Tangie; Forbish, Sherry; Greaney, Chris; Hibbard, Scott; Janzen, Randy; Linhart, Joe; McDaniel, Janet; Scurlock, Debra; Sturr, Kathy; Woodson, Harry; Giambrone, Laura; Hernandez, Bert; McEvoy, Christine; Miller, Beverly; Minter, Tracy; Mulligan, Amy; Ward, Linda Cc: Blair, Lynn Subject: Astro Tickets I have 4 tickets for the Astros game on Thursday,July 12 and 4 tickets for Friday, July 13th. Does anyone have a customer they would like to take to the game either one one of those nights? Please let me know ASAP. Thanks. Lynn
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
Mog, As requested, here is the Socal file. Please keep this within the company, as it represents a competitive advantage to Enron. Thanks. Mat
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
We will be releasing new version of the Stack Manager and the EnronOnline website tonight . The following are the changes 1. Changes to Stack Manager: 1.1 Changes to toolbar icons: To facilitate further development of the system, it has been found necessary to change the toolbar icons at the top of the Stack Manager. The attached file shows the old icon and its new replacement. Next to each image below is the description of the function that is executed as well as the short cut key that is mapped to the same function: 1.2 New Functionality - Auto Suspend The Auto Suspend function allows traders to set an absolute price change from a price level at which you would like the system to automatically suspend a specific product. This function is useful if your products use automatic price resets. To activate this feature: 1. Select a product and click on Product Properties 2. Check the Enable box 3. Enter the Price Check and Suspend at +/- values 4. Click Update Example: a trader Enables Auto Suspend and selects a $35.00 Price Check and a suspension level of +/- $5.00: The system will suspend the product when the mid price is above $40.00 or below $30.00 You will need to enter a new Price Check or disable the Auto Suspend function to reactivate this Product if the Auto Suspend is triggered. Please note the system checks for any products that need to be suspended once a minute. 2. Changes to EnronOnline Website (These changes will be rolled out in phases over the next week and will be available to all customers only by Friday 5/4/01) The following enhancements have been made to the EnronOnline Website: 2.1 Today's Transactions Float Window: In order to float the window, right click on the Today's Transactions section, click on the Float Window option. Sort Ordering: Click on the column heading to change the sort order. Linked Transactions: You can display the linked Transactions in an expanded or collapsed view. To do so, right click in the Transaction display area and select full Expand or Full Collapse. 2.2 Submission Box The submission box has been modified in order to show a space between each set of "zeros" for the volume the customer wants to sell/buy. Savita
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
Linda, I went ahead and assigned Beverly Miller, Amy Mulligan and Richard Hanigriff to review you. You need to submit those three names in the morning. Thanks. Lynn
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
I will be stopping by this morning to distribute the pages that were missing from the "Options" section in your Deriviatives I binder. Let me know if you have any questions. Thanks, Grace
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
Sorry I didn't have much time to talk yesterday. The presentation went well. We had a great turnout and Celeste, Andrew Miles and John Walt (and the other Enron attendees) did a great job. I'm going to talk to Traci on Monday. Kristin Gandy 01/29/2001 12:38 PM To: Abhijeet Naik/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Alhamd Alkhayat/NA/Enron@Enron, Andrew Miles/NA/Enron@Enron, Brian O'Rourke/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, [email protected], Danielle Saadia/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, David Dye/HOU/EES@EES, David Maskell/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Ding Yuan/Corp/Enron@Enron, Doug Sewell/HOU/ECT@ECT, John Kiani/HOU/EES@EES, John Walt/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Kate Fraser/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kelli Little/NA/Enron@ENRON, [email protected], [email protected], Marilyn Baker/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Mark Courtney/HOU/ECT@ECT, Micha Makowsky/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Michelle Juden/HOU/EES@EES, Patrick Wade/HOU/ECT@ECT, Paul Quilkey/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Pearce W Hammond/Corp/Enron@Enron, Pushkar Shahi/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rob Wheeler/HOU/EES@EES, Savita Puthigai/NA/Enron@Enron, Steve Gim/NA/Enron@ENRON, Traci Warner/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, [email protected], Aamir Maniar/NA/Enron@ENRON, John Suttle/HOU/ECT@ECT, Trey Cash/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Jason R Williams/NA/Enron@Enron, Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@ENRON, Pearce W Hammond/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Jaime Gualy/NA/Enron@Enron, Mark Courtney/HOU/EES@EES, Brad Alford/NA/Enron@Enron cc: Subject: Revision Presentation time is here! Logistics are listed below: What: Rice MBA Spring Intern Presentation When: Thursday, February 1st Where: Room 124 in the Business School Time: 7:30pm - 9:00pm Please be at the B-school by 7:00pm for set-up and cocktails. Reception will take place immediate following the presentation in the Student Lounge. Please RSVP if you are available to me at extension 53214. * Resume selection meeting will take place the following Monday, February 5th at 2pm in room 11C2. Thank you, Kristin Gandy Associate Recruiter
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
JUST A REMINDER: The answer to the United Way Pre-qualifying Questionnaire need to be turned in by the end of tomorrow, July 26, 2000. To find the questionnaire form to submit - see the email sent from the United Way Campaign 2000, dated 7/19/00. I encourage you all to participate. Thanks.
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
HPL is ok. D
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
Please take a minute and select your reviewers for the PRC process. Thanks, Kay
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
GOOD news I have the gty and will Fed X same to you today!! Have you been on any more hikes? -----Original Message----- From: [email protected]@ENRON [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Monday, August 06, 2001 6:13 PM To: Perlingiere, Debra Subject: Master Firm Agreement - Enron/MarkWest Debra, Following up.... Is the guaranty still pending execution? Sarai ----- Forwarded by Sarai Renken/Denver/MarkWest on 08/06/2001 05:07 PM ----- Sarai Renken To: [email protected] 07/31/2001 cc: 04:48 PM Subject: Master Firm Agreement - Enron/MarkWest(Document link: Sarai Renken) Debra, I wanted to let you know that I have not yet received the Guaranty Agreement under separate cover, as promised. Sarai
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
The following expense report is ready for approval: Employee Name: Heather M. Dunton Status last changed by: Automated Administrator Expense Report Name: Dunton, Heather 10/25/01 Report Total: $900.00 Amount Due Employee: $900.00 To approve this expense report, click on the following link for Concur Expense. http://expensexms.enron.com
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
The report named: West VaR <http://trv.corp.enron.com/linkFromExcel.asp?report_cd=36&report_name=West+VaR&category_cd=2&category_name=WEST&toc_hide=1&sTV1=2&TV1Exp=Y&current_efct_date=11/20/2001>, published as of 11/20/2001 is now available for viewing on the website.
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
TOO COOL
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
FYI - attached is the recent IEP filing related to the market response project.? This filing is the IEP response to the Wood ACR. - response to wood final rtf.rtf
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
Tana, Please put in place a confidentiality agreement with Brentbroker prior to me replying to his email. Thanks Louise Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp. From: "Pete Groetzinger" <[email protected]> 12/07/2000 14:21 To: <[email protected]> cc: Subject: ENRON TO CONNECT Enron Online TO TRUE QUOTE Louise - I invite you to partner with BrentBroker.com to allow the dissemination of EOL crude & refined product quotes onto our platform. At the moment, it looks as if we are supporting markets that won't compete directly with those announced for True Quote. We are going live within the next week or so and are narrowly focused on the crude physical, crude derivative and refined product derivative markets (we have received our CFTC no-action relief). You may have heard, we are also commission free. Your participation in BrentBroker would be welcomed. Regards, Peter V. Groetzinger, COO BrentBroker.com One Riverway, Suite 2500 Houston, Texas 77056 USA 713.888.0500 www.brentbroker.com
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
The article below describes two separate paths that EPA is considering for regulating MTBE. They are also considering action on a request from the state of California to grant its request for an oxygenate waiver through regulatory means. Taken in conjunction with the increased interest on Capitol Hill for moving oxygenate waiver or MTBE phase out legislation, the future does not look very bright for MTBE. We will continue to pursue on Capitol Hill our Enron-developed approach which proposes stranded cost recovery and liability protection for US MTBE producers. The House and Senate will be moving forward with hearings and legislation shortly, and we will keep you posted on our efforts and other developments. ******** E&E Newsline Feb. 24,2000 Volume II, Issue 18 -------------------------------- 1. AIR POLLUTION/WATER POLLUTION -------------------------------- EPA FLOATS TWO PROPOSALS AFFECTING MTBE, REFORMULATED GASOLINE The Environmental Protection Agency has advanced proposals dealing with the touchy issues of methyl tertiary butyl ether regulation and with the reformulated gasoline program to the White House Office of Management and Budget, and although the two proposals are being kept under wraps they have already spurred controversy and debate. Both items were forwarded to OMB Feb. 15 and both will appear in the Federal Register probably after 90 days of OMB review, the standard time allotted for such proposals. With neither proposal having been made public, speculation abounds about both. The first item -- which is being reviewed by OMB as an advanced notice of proposed rulemaking (ANPR) -- aims to control MTBE, a synthetic "oxygenate" added to gasoline to lower emissions of air pollutants. The Clean Air Act mandates that certain urban areas with high levels of air pollution contain 2 percent-by-weight level of oxygenates in their gasoline in order to reduce emissions of ozone-forming hydrocarbons and carbon monoxide. To comply with this reformulated gas (RFG) mandate, MTBE is relied on for over 80 percent of the gasoline, ethanol is used in almost 15 percent, and other oxygenates make up for the remaining amount. Although MTBE has been heralded for its role in reducing air emissions, it is under attack because of environmental contamination, particularly to groundwater. In fact, both the Senate and House have plans to move legislation to allow states to waive the oxygenate mandate, and California has requested a waiver from the RFG requirements, an issue that could induce other states that have problems with MTBE contamination to take similar action. Now, however, EPA appears poised to take action of its own. According to sources, the EPA plan would seek to control MTBE under the Toxic Substances Control Act. TSCA provides EPA the authority to prohibit certain chemicals or substances if the agency concludes it "presents or will present an unreasonable risk of injury to health or the environment." "MTBE clearly meets this test," claimed Sen. Barbara Boxer (D- Calif.), who has in the past fought to have MTBE phased out. However, Terry Wigglesworth, executive director of the Oxygenated Fuels Association, which represents MTBE producers, argued otherwise. "TSCA is not a good technical choice," she said of EPA's proposal. Among the hurdles EPA will face with the proposal, she predicted, is that under TSCA, EPA must look at the risks to human health and the environment, "but there are enormous air quality benefits due to MTBE use, for example there have been significant reductions in ozone and air toxic emissions, such as benzene." "Also under TSCA, EPA must determine if the risk could be reduced by other federal laws already being administered," she explained, pointing specifically to the underground storage tank program, which she said has not been complied with too well. In a Feb. 22 letter to EPA Administrator Carol Browner, Boxer said, "Some critics of this approach argue that MTBE contamination may be controlled by upgrading our underground storage tanks. This won't solve the MTBE problem, however, because we now know that even those new tanks leak." She also said, "MTBE poses a more pervasive water contamination problem than the other harmful constituents of gasoline like benzene because it moves through water faster, farther and persists longer than those constituents." Whether EPA's proposal would entail banning, phasing out or capping MTBE use is unclear and was disputed among various sources. However, one industry source said that EPA was not taking a stance on that issue and would first take public comment through the ANPR and proposed rule. Although sources indicated that the ANPR would not typically be printed in the Federal Register until the 90-day review period has expired, "We heard EPA asked OMB to fast track it," one industry source said. And a federal government source also hinted that the proposal would be reviewed very quickly. The second proposal is shrouded in even more ambiguity. What is certain is that the proposal would entail an "adjustment" to RFG, as stated by an OMB source. Environmental and industry sources said that the hints they've gotten indicate that the proposal entails an offset for carbon monoxide. According to these sources, EPA has discussed this option with stakeholders in the past. Under the proposal, certain RFG provisions concerning emissions of volatile organic compounds would be loosened as long as there were significant reductions in CO emissions. VOCs are blamed for ozone production, and carbon monoxide also contributes to ozone. According to an environmentalist, this proposal would encourage increased reliance on ethanol by refineries. Wigglesworth spoke against this proposal, saying, "Any loosening of requirements to maintain actual air quality benefits that we've achieved through cleaner burning gasoline that would turn back the clock on cleaner air or air quality would be unacceptable."
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
OK
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
Performance Management for Electric Distribution Companies An Executive Forum October 25-26, 2001, Atlanta, GA OVERVIEW Deregulation is introducing competition into the electric utility industry in an ever-increasing rate, and it is requiring companies to consider dramatic changes in their business processes, in the operation of their businesses, and in managing their assets. Issues such as customer satisfaction, performance based rates, operational reliability targets, operational efficiencies, risk management, and rate reductions are among the new business drivers. With the advent of new choices open to the smallest retail customers as well as the largest industrials, distribution companies are re-engineering their businesses and re-establishing their corporate priorities in response to these new challenges. This new business environment has brought performance management to the forefront for the electric distribution companies, and they are being driven by regulators, customers, and financial rating agencies to improve all aspects of their performance. Through this conference, we have gathered leading executives from distribution companies, wires companies, generation companies, energy marketers, regulators, and market participants to openly discuss the issues, their experiences, and their corporate strategies. Our objective for this executive forum is to provide you with new insights into how electric distribution companies are addressing these issues and concerns, and to help you formulate your own corporate approach to this challenging and complex new world. The website link for the conference is provided below. Please click the link to see the program agenda, general information including location and hotel, and online registration. You can also register by calling us at 303-770-8800. Performance Management for Electric Distribution Companies, October 25-26, 2001, Atlanta, GAhttp://www.euci.com/confoverview.asp?ConfID=11 Ancillary Services Conference October 31-November 2, 2001, Denver, CO OVERVIEW The Ancillary Services conference will explore the rapidly changing and fascinating engineering, economic, market, and policy issues related to bulk-power ancillary services. These issues are difficult to resolve because these services are essential for both reliability and commerce, and it is often difficult to disentangle the two. Topics to be covered at this event include centralized vs. supplier unit commitment, integration of ancillary-service markets with energy and congestion markets, relationships among forward and real-time markets, measuring the performance of ancillary-service delivery, operating costs to provide these services, retail-load provision of some ancillary services, comparisons among the existing ISOs and future RTOs in their treatment of ancillary services, and the feasibility of letting price influence the amount of reserves acquired. Electric Utility Consultants, Inc., a long-time provider of timely conferences and workshops for the electric industry, has assembled a covey of top experts to explore all aspects of the emerging field in a conference devoted exclusively to Ancillary Services. The website link for this conference is provided below: Ancillary Services Conference. October 31-November 2, 2001, Denver, COhttp://www.euci.com/confoverview.asp?ConfID=10 Performance-Based Ratemaking Conference December 5-7, 2001, Denver, CO OVERVIEW Performance Based Ratemaking (PBR) is emerging as a key element of the restructuring of the electric utility industry. For PBR to be effective it must be designed carefully and uniquely for each utility so as to align the interests of the utility, the shareholders and the customers and also to make sure that PBR is successful in achieving efficiency and service quality. EUCI has put together a covey of expert speakers to review and address the latest PBR developments and applications. Join us in Denver and get the latest state-of-the-art information and insights you will need to develop an effective PBR strategy for your company. The website link for this conference is provided below: Performance-Based Ratemaking Conference, Dec. 6-7, 2001, Denver, COhttp://www.euci.com/confoverview.asp?ConfID=9 Electric Power Market Performance Conference December 12-14, 2001, Denver, CO OVERVIEW Each year there is additional opportunity to draw lessons regarding electricity market structure and design from actual market performance. These lessons are leading to a convergence in market design, at least in the Eastern Interconnection and ERCOT. One focus of this conference will be on the lessons to be drawn from the experience of the new ERCOT markets, the continuing market design problems in California, and the difficulties in developing and implementing a market based congestion management system in the midwest. A second focus of this conference will be on the existing markets in PJM and New York, which have now moved beyond managing their internal markets and are being pushed by market participants and regulatory agencies to better address inter-RTO coordination and develop market based incentive systems for transmission expansion. Finally, the conference will highlight one of the important, but little noticed successes of the Eastern ISOs, which is the explosive growth in the PJM and New York financial rights auctions. The website link for this conference and associated workshop is provided below: Electric Power Market Performance Conference, Dec. 13-14, 2001, Denver, COhttp://www.euci.com/confoverview.asp?ConfID=12 We have recently updated our website to include new conference proceedings on recently-held "Power Generation Asset Management" and "Power T&D Asset Management" conferences. Please visit www.euci.com and review the conference proceedings section. Kindly forward this announcement to your colleagues who might benefit from attending these events. Best Regards, L. Mrig Electric Utility Consultants, Inc. (EUCI) 5555 Preserve Drive Greenwood Village CO 80121 Tel: 303-770-8800 Fax: [email protected]
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
whasssup?
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
I am forwarding for your attention the resume of Peter Percell who has an extensive experience in modeling physical flows of natural gas in pipeline systems. Peter is looking currently for a job. I met him last week at the meeting of the Science and Industry Advance with Mathematics society at the University of Houston. The application of recent developments in optimization theory and numerical methods can help Enron to improve further efficiency of our pipeline system and reduce the consumption of compressor fuel. Please, let me know if you interested in introducing Peter to executives in your organization. I shall be glad to make arrangements for an interview. Vince Kaminski ---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 04/30/2001 02:17 PM --------------------------- Peter Percell <[email protected]> on 04/30/2001 11:16:58 AM To: Vincent Kaminski <[email protected]> cc: Subject: Follow-up on SIAM Workshop I enjoyed your presentation, and meeting you briefly afterwards, at the SIAM Workshop last Friday. I have extensive experience as a technical leader in the design and development of modeling and simulation software products, mostly for the oil and gas pipeline industry. I am looking for a position that can utilize my software development and mathematical skills. Getting out of the narrow confines of the pipeline simulation industry would be a plus. Please consider whether I might fit in your group. Your answer to a question indicated that I have several of the skills you look for. Also, please let me know, by email, the names and contact information of other managers within Enron who might benefit from having someone with my qualifications in their group. Attached are my resume and an addendum covering academic & consulting experience. Publications are available on request. I will call you in a couple of days to follow up on this email. Thank you for your time. Peter Percell 10030 Doliver Drive [email protected] Houston, TX 77042-2016 (713) 532-3836 voice & fax - Percell, Peter Resume Only.doc - Percell, Peter A&C Exp.doc
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
You by chance know where the review is tomorrow? It's from 10 am to 2 pm, right? Thanks a bunch.
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
Just few comments 2.We decided to require Conterparties to provide address details in the PA 3. We can delete the GST clause. The collateral clause is only for certain counterparties In the second paragragh there is a reference to "paragraphs 2.1 to 2.6". If the GST and the collateral clause are deleted this should be "2.1 to 2.4" or "2.1 to 2.5" with the collateral clause. Mark Dilworth@ECT 03/10/2000 08:31 PM To: David Forster/HOU/ECT@ECT cc: Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, David Minns/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT Subject: Re: Australian Legal Documents 1 - need version control details (and obviously lose the appendix and other inappropriate headings). 2 - PA has contact details appended which will take it beyond the standard 1 page that has been a requirement to date. (Or the formatting will be strange). 3 - I have this copy of GTC which includes the collateral clause - though no GST. As per my note ysterday, I will be loading latest versions to allow product set up etc. to go ahead. M David Forster 03/09/2000 11:10 PM To: Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, David Minns/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT cc: Mark Dilworth/LON/ECT@ECT Subject: Australian Legal Documents Attached are copies of the ETA, PA and GTC which were attached to David Minns' email of Feb. 28. David: Please let me know if this date (and therefore these copies) represent your final drafts. Mark: Please let me know if you have any comments on the attached, or if you are happy to approve them as is. I note that the GTC still needs a GST clause. Thanks, Dave
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
I think we are making great progress on the systems side. I would like to set a deadline of November 10th to have a plan on all North American projects (I'm ok if fundementals groups are excluded) that is signed off on by commercial, Sally's world, and Beth's world. When I say signed off I mean that I want signitures on a piece of paper that everyone is onside with the plan for each project. If you don't agree don't sign. If certain projects (ie. the gas plan) are not done yet then lay out a timeframe that the plan will be complete. I want much more in the way of specifics about objectives and timeframe. Thanks for everyone's hard work on this. John
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
I will have 4 books: CAND-MGMT-BAS for all AECO and DAWN BASIS CAND-MGMT-GD for fixed price AECO and DAWN CAND-MGMT-PR for NYMEX CAND-MGMT-PWR fot Alberta, MID-C, Ontario, NY, NEPOOL, PJM, Cinergy power -----Original Message----- From: Postlethwaite, John Sent: Tuesday, February 05, 2002 3:47 PM To: Belden, Tim; Zufferli, John Cc: White, Stacey W.; Reeves, Kathy; Poston, David Subject: EOL - Multiple Trading Books (URGENT) Tim and John, I wanted to touch base with you regarding a problem that we have run into between EOL and a trader having multiple trading books. EOL has been set up to have a trader associated with one and only one trading book in the stack manager. As a result, when creating the interface between EOL and Enpower we can cannot assign multiple trading books to one person. David Poston in the Enpower IT support group in Houston has been working with the EOL group and has come up with a solution. 1. If you definitely plan to be trading on EOL for all trading books associated with your name, EOL IT can define certain products to each trading book. If this is the approach that you would like to take, I will need a list of what products you want to trade and to which trading book they are affiliated with. 2. The other option is that you will just use one trading book under your name. If that is the case, no changes will have to be made. If the plan is to use the first option, please let me know so we can make the changes and do the necessary testing on this. John
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
Per: I've talked to him several times in the past. I told him that you would call because of your experience with setting up funds. They have two main problems. One is setting up their internal systems. Second, they have credit problems with a BBB+. Please call and introduce yourself. Thanks, john To: John Arnold/HOU/ECT@ECT cc: Subject: Re: FW: trading John, did you answer him or should I respond? Per John Arnold 06/26/2000 05:18 PM To: Per Sekse/NY/ECT@ECT cc: Subject: FW: trading ---------------------- Forwarded by John Arnold/HOU/ECT on 06/26/2000 04:17 PM --------------------------- Steve List <[email protected]> on 06/26/2000 12:32:02 PM To: "'[email protected]'" <[email protected]> cc: Subject: FW: trading > -----Original Message----- > From: Steve List > Sent: Monday, June 26, 2000 1:26 PM > To: '[email protected]' > Subject: trading > > > John, > > I hope all is well down in Houston, though it would seem your baseball > team is, well, terrible. > We may be close to resolving our internal issues as our CEO indicated on > Friday. We are awaiting some > confirmation but it seems we are close. How is the credit standing for > Enron? > Is there a chance of upgrade or well, you can tell me the status. > > Thanks > > Steve List
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
See Enron Corp. Board Meeting information below. Deb Deb Korkmas EWS Legal Dept. 1400 Smith Street, Room 3819 Houston, TX 77002 Phone: 713-853-5448 Fax: 713-646-3393 ----- Forwarded by Deb Korkmas/HOU/ECT on 04/09/2001 05:14 PM ----- Rebecca Carter@ENRON Sent by: Kelly Johnson@ENRON 04/09/2001 03:48 PM To: John Ale/HOU/AZURIX@AZURIX, Charles Cheek/Enron@EnronXGate, Mark Evans/Legal/LON/ECT@ECT, Drew Fossum/Enron@EnronXGate, Mark E Haedicke/HOU/ECT@ECT, Elizabeth Labanowski/Enron@EnronXGate, mmanly@newpower@EES, Jordan Mintz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kristina Mordaunt/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Eric Newell/EWC/Enron@ENRON, Janet Place/NPNG/Enron@ENRON, Rex Rogers/Enron@EnronXGate, Vicki Sharp/HOU/EES@EES, Stephen Wallace/Enron@EnronXGate, Rob Walls/ENRON@enronXgate, Robert Eickenroht/Enron@EnronXGate, Jim Armogida/Enron@EnronXGate, Clement Abrams/Enron@EnronXGate, Melinda Winn/Enron@EnronXGate, Brenda L Funk/Enron@EnronXGate, Gareth Bahlmann/Enron@EnronXGate cc: Deb Korkmas/HOU/ECT@ECT, Diana Jebousek/HOU/AZURIX@AZURIX, Michelle Lawless/Enron@EnronXGate, Tracy Foy/LON/ECT@ECT, Betsy Raybon/Enron@EnronXGate, Darlene C Forsyth/Enron@EnronXGate, Robin Jordan/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Elaine Esparza/EWC/Enron@ENRON, Connie Alvis/NPNG/Enron@ENRON, Sharon Morgan/Enron@EnronXGate, Leasa Lopez/HOU/EES@EES, Lisa M Kumbalek/Enron@EnronXGate, Debra Hicks/Enron@EnronXGate, Gina Karathanos/Enron@EnronXGate, Candy C Willard/Enron@EnronXGate Subject: Board of Directors Meeting - May 1, 2001
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
here is the location of the file and the person that compiled the file,. Please let me know if you need anything else, thanks. PL -----Original Message----- From: Ma, Felicia Sent: Monday, October 15, 2001 5:54 PM To: Love, Phillip M. Cc: Ma, Felicia Subject: File is ready - Chicago office listing CPR does not have historical data before Oct. 2000. Please go to O:\_Dropbox\FMA to pick up the file. File name is "enovate.xls". Felicia -----Original Message----- From: Love, Phillip M. Sent: Monday, October 15, 2001 12:54 PM To: Ma, Felicia Subject: Chicago office listing Kam Keiser suggested I call you to help with a request I received from our auditors. Can you give me a list of all of the deals that have been put into Sitara for the Chicago office - the book/counterparty name will be Enovate. The Arthur Anderson auditors have requested this information. They are doing an audit of Enovate and want a list of all of the deals since the book started in order to get a sample size for their audit. you should not have to go back farther than 01/00. Thanks for your help and shout if you need anymore information. PL
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
Good deal. If there's anything else, just give a holler. Best, Jeff Eric Letke@EES 03/20/2001 04:31 PM To: Marty Sunde/HOU/EES@EES cc: Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Sandra McCubbin/NA/Enron@Enron, Greg Sharp/HOU/EES@EES Subject: Re: Follow up with Alpert's Office I talked with Hedy (sp?) Govenar this afternoon. Two developments: 1.) "Noise" from Ms. Alpert's office has stopped. We believe initial reports from Staff may have been overstated. 2.) Decisions on Enron's proposed amendments are due today. Timing wouldn't not be right for a discussion with me. Action: Hedy is aware of the situation and has asked Staff to tell her of any more occurrences. Hedy has my number and will be in touch with any reports, at which time we will take action. For now, we will let the "dog" sleep and lie. ---------------------- Forwarded by Eric Letke/DUB/EES on 03/20/2001 04:20 PM --------------------------- Enron Energy Services From: Marty Sunde 03/20/2001 09:25 AM Phone No: 713 853-7797 Phone 888-953-9478 SkyTel Pager EB 889 To: Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Eric Letke/DUB/EES@EES, Sandra McCubbin/NA/Enron@Enron cc: Subject: Re: Follow up with Alpert's Office Jeff and Eric, I have NO problem trying to get letters for support of Direct Access. Eric, if we can get those to support Jeff and Sandi, this is wonderful. Also, I had asked Eric to check with Alpert's office to register our follow on phone number and offer to try to correct the aggravated customers. Eric, if you can provide a status on all of these as you make progress, that's appreciated. ---------------------- Forwarded by Marty Sunde/HOU/EES on 03/20/2001 09:13 AM --------------------------- From: Jeff Dasovich@ENRON on 03/19/2001 07:57 PM Sent by: Jeff Dasovich@ENRON To: Marty Sunde/HOU/EES@EES cc: Eric Letke/DUB/EES@EES, Heidi Messick/EFS/EES@EES, Sandra McCubbin/NA/Enron@ENRON Subject: Re: Follow up with Alpert's Office Marty: Thanks for the information. Getting Eric's contact information to Alpert's office is in motion. Regarding attempt to follow-up with those who called Alpert's office to complain, I wasn't clear on that action. Likely makes sense for Eric to coordinate with Sandi to make the contact with Alpert's office. Letters are an attempt to influence Alpert to 1) fix the Direct Access prohibition and 2) ensure that DA customers don't get saddled with the DWR costs. Let me know if this approach works. Best, Jeff Marty Sunde@EES 03/19/2001 07:02 PM To: Jeff Dasovich/Na/Enron@ENRON cc: Eric Letke/DUB/EES@EES, Heidi Messick/EFS/EES@EES, Sandra McCubbin/NA/Enron@Enron Subject: Re: Follow up with Alpert's Office All I asked Eric to do was: ensure that there was an Enron contact if another complaint came in. find out from Alpert's office if we could call back a few of those who called to complain to find out what they perceived, correct the misperception, apologize. From: Jeff Dasovich@ENRON on 03/19/2001 04:20 PM Sent by: Jeff Dasovich@ENRON To: Scott Govenar <[email protected]>, Eric Letke/DUB/EES@EES, Sandra McCubbin/NA/Enron@Enron, [email protected], Susan J Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON, [email protected], Karen Denne/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Janel Guerrero/Corp/Enron@Enron, Paul Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT, Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Harry Kingerski/NA/Enron@Enron, [email protected], [email protected], Marty Sunde/HOU/EES@EES cc: Subject: Follow up with Alpert's Office Thanks, Scott. Scott/Hedy/Sandi/Bev: Erik Letke heads up the retail marketing effort underway in San Diego. Marty Sunde wants Alpert to have an EES commercial contact that she can talk to in the event she has further questions, etc., He'd like Erki to be the contact person. Erik could you copy your vitals (title, contact info) to Scott and Hedy Govenar and Sandi McCubbin so they can forward along to Alpert? Erik, seems that it would be useful if the customer letters to Alpert could make the following points (folks please weigh in and add/subtract/modify if needed): The customer's glad to have had the option to take Direct Access service from Enron because having the opportunity to take advantage of the offer has made the customer better off. Direct Access is an extremely important option that customers need, want and should have going forward. Any "solution" that the Legislature comes up with must therefore include the continuation of Direct Access for all customers. As such, the Legislature should immediately fix AB 1X to make sure that Direct Access remains a permanent fixture of California's energy strategy. Direct Access customers should not be forced to pay for DWR's power purchase costs, since Direct Access customers aren't benefitting from those purchases. Best, Jeff Scott Govenar <[email protected]> 03/19/2001 04:01 PM To: Jeff Dasovich <[email protected]> cc: Subject: Dede As discussed, customers should send letters to Dede as follows: The Honrable Dede Alpert California State Senate State Capitol, Room 5050 Sacramento, CA 95814 Interested companies should copy: "Honorable Members of the California State Legislature" and fax or mail me a copy for further distribution. My fax is (916) 448-0816 and my address is 1127 11th Street, Suite #400, Sacramento, CA 95814. Scott
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
fyi.. -----Original Message----- From: CustomerNotices, WGPHOU [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2001 3:43 PM Subject: Third Revised Terrebonne PVR % for October 2001 Date: October 23, 2001 To: Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Corporation Customers and Shippers Re: Third Revised Terrebonne PVR % for October, 2001 North Terrebonne Plant Operator has advised Transco that the plant is currently operating at 100% of its normal capacity for the remainder of October 2001. Please be advised that the percentages for Production Blocks and Associated Meter Stations as listed on the previous notice dated September 28, 2001 will be adjusted to reflect plant operations at 100% of its normal capacity in October, effective October 24, 2001. Please direct any questions regarding this subject to your Transportation Scheduling Representative or Rose Prevott at 713-215-4396. Larry G. Cunningham Manager Transportation Receipts 713/215-2665
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
The following entities were acquired on March 30, 2001: Daishowa Forest Products Ltd., a Canada Federal corporation: Parent Company: EIM Holdings (Canada) Co. - 100% Business: Management and service company. Shares: Authorized: Unlimited Common shares; no par value; Issued - 501. Authorized: Unlimited Pref. Redeemable; no par value; Issued - 586,000. Directors and officers: Unknown Employees: Yes Company No.: 1588 DFPL Compagnie de Papiers Stadacona Ltee, f/k/a Daishowa Inc., a Quebec corporation: Parent Company: Daishowa Forest Products Ltd. - 100% Business: Quebec paper mill that manufactures newsprint, directory paper and paper board. Shares: Class A: Authorized: Unlimited; no par value; Issued - 380,101. Class B: Authorized: Unlimited; no par value; Issued - 0. Directors and officers: Unknown Employees: Yes Company No.: 1589 DSHW Ste. Aurelie Timberlands, Co., Ltd., a Maine corporation: Parent Company: EIM Holdings (US) Inc.- 100% Business: To own and develop timberlands in the state of Maine. Shares: Authorized: 3,000 Common shares; no par value; Issued - 410. Directors and officers: Unknown Employees: Yes Company No.: 1590 SATC NOTE: Sylvia Hu - corporate records to follow as received; we will maintain mirror minute books only for all 3 entities. Sharon Butcher - these companies have employees. Deb Korkmas - please supply slates of directors and officers. Kate B. Cole Director, Corporate Services Enron Corp. Tel: (713) 853-1624 Fax: (713) 646-8007 Email: [email protected]
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
Maria, Further to our conversation, please see the attached GISB draft. Debra Perlingiere Enron North America Corp. 1400 Smith Street, EB 3885 Houston, Texas 77002 [email protected] Phone 713-853-7658 Fax 713-646-3490
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
A new banking/rersearch weekly activity summary for eBusiness services sector. (See attached file: 12.8 Weekly Market Sector Update.doc) Jeff L. Sadler FAC/Equities 53 State Street, 29th Floor Boston, MA 02109 617-228-3070 - 12.8 Weekly Market Sector Update.doc
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
This is what I mean aout miscommunication. ---------------------- Forwarded by John J Lavorato/Corp/Enron on 10/11/2000 02:22 PM --------------------------- From: Kevin M Presto @ ECT 10/10/2000 09:24 AM To: John J Lavorato/Corp/Enron@Enron cc: Subject: Power Hedges in Accrual Book Stacy White informed me this morning there is discussions on moving all of the Power Hedges from the accrual book (approx $100 million loss) into the MTM books. Is this true? Do I need to be in the loop? FYI - We successfully bought out of the 2001 supply commitment to OPPD at our mark ($4.7 million). This leaves us with 3 customer deals that I would like to set aside as prudency C for East Power (not West Power or gas) for calender year 2001. The 3 deals are MJMUC, VEPCO, and JEA. Thanks.
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
A key goal of Global Strategic Sourcing is to set increasingly higher standards of excellence and customer satisfaction. To help us better achieve that goal, we would like to obtain some insights from you in order to develop the best possible overall travel program for Enron. Please take a few minutes to complete this confidential survey, as your input is important and vital to the success of this program. Thank you, Global Strategic Sourcing http://etcsurvey.corp.enron.com/wi/p0714726/i.asp?r=6377&s=VPHUONFN&l=9 Experiencing technical problems? If this link does not automatically launch the questionnaire: 1. Launch by copying the link above into your browser, or 2. If you continue to have technical difficulties, please send an email message to [email protected] 3. Please do not forward this link to anyone else, as the responses should remain confidential.
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
-----Original Message----- From: Gerry, Robert Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 11:47 AM To: Sturm, Fletcher J.; Ballato, Russell; Kaniss, Jason Subject: if work ever gets you down.. If your job ever gets you down, just click the link below. http://www.studentmagazine.com/thisweek/thisweek_article.asp?articleID=213
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
Craig - There was nothing attached to your e-mail so I assumed you were sending something by hard copy - we haven't received anything yet. Mark Craig Breslau 06/03/2000 02:58 PM To: Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, John Suttle/HOU/ECT@ECT cc: George N Gilbert/HOU/ECT@ECT, William S Bradford/HOU/ECT@ECT Subject: Orlando Utilities Commission Mark, I am forwarding a copy of OUC's ISDA along with a copy of their charter and their outside legal opinion on their ability to enter into financial hedges. Could you please assign to the appropriate attorney to work on this ISDA. John, I'm not sure if you are the approprite credit person or not to work on this. They mentioned that they have already exchanged credit information between OUC and Enron. If you're not the right person, could you please pass it on. I would like to push this process along to get an executed ISDA between OUC and Enron. I believe that they could be a good counterparty for us. Thanks for your help. Craig
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
Paula, I included both your addresses.
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
Kevin, Here is the revised list from Shelley's team. They have substituted a number of folks. Darrell, Tim, Dannis, Terry, Gary, Please provide Kevin Dumas with your home phone and address so he can determine if the service is available for you. Once we know what service is available for each of you, we will confirm approval to proceed, and then move forward. Mike, We will need charge codes for all of Shelley's staff. Gary -----Original Message----- From: Dumas, Kevin Sent: Friday, March 01, 2002 2:27 PM To: Kenagy, Gary Cc: Hawkins, Don; Hagen, Bob; Montgomery, Donald; Rahn, Nick; Vela, Monica Subject: IP Net Options Gary, Please see the attached xls for cost related to; adjusted monthly reoccurring fees installation fees cost of an IP enabled NEC phone Before I can order these circuits, I need to know the charge codes for each new user and your point person to work with IPNet on each installation. Please confirm that each user shown in the xls, does want the IP phone option. This will bring use to 32 IP-phones in service through the Ardmore switch. The over subscription issue will be resolved in 45 -65 days. The cost does represent the addition of a second T1 into Ardmore. Don, Don, & Bob, IPNet can only provide T1 service to your homes @ a base fee of $315 monthly. I assumed that you do not want to fund that amount. If this is incorrect, please let me know. If you have any questions, please call me.
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
No, we don't currently have Alberta Prepay docs. Greg has finally gotten them all and is preparing sets.
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
The Senate voted on the Interior Appropriations Bill late yesterday. Our amendment passed, which prevents either BLM or the Forest Service from enacting new fiber optic federal lands rights-of-way policies. The BLM made a last ditch effort to defeat this in the Senate, but we had reached key Senators and staff and they got nowhere. Action now moves to Conference, which for us means a focus on the House Conference members. Scott and I will spend the next 2 days meeting with the key Republicans in the House. We've already recruited the important Democrats. Interior Approps Subcommittee Chairman Regula remains opposed, at least publicly, but we think we can get other Members to swing him. We trust he'll come up with a sensible, face saving compromise on his own, eg, formally beginning a review process with his Subcommittee having oversight -- at this point, our language literally forbids BLM or Forest Service from even meeting to discuss the issue. We continue, though, on several other fronts: 1. We have the New Dems writing OMB on the issue and several Senators and Congressmen writing BLM and USFS 2. We've increased the pressure on the White House, and are letting them know through very senior back door channels that in our opinion, BLM/Forest Service have not gotten the message. Our position is that we'll be satisfied that they've changed their evil ways when the new assessment on the Mt. Hood EBS build is retracted. 3. We're preparing both Senate and House authorizing Committees for the longer-term issue next session. We have no trouble finding champtions eager to own the issue 4. We're engaging the Western Caucus for same 5. Our adhoc coalition continues to grow in numbers and clout with over 20 companies and associations now actively engaged. Enron chairs this initiative, with a tangible side benefit being much increased visibility and stature as a serious communications player. 6. Scott is successfully engaging state and local officials to weigh in from the end-user perspective BLM is on the retreat and has asked for a meeting, which we've refused. We don't think they've given up though, and it's likely an issue of pride at this point. So until the Approps process concludes we're continuing with the full court press. Steve
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
Jody, Please FEDEX and fax the GE LOC's to Rick Vicens at Delta Power. Delta Power 89 Headquarters Plaza North Tower, 14th Floor Morristown, NJ 07960 ph: 973-993-1854 fax: 973-326-1821 Thanks, Steve ---------------------- Forwarded by Stephen Thome/HOU/ECT on 05/04/2001 11:22 AM --------------------------- "Anthony Harrington" <[email protected]> on 05/04/2001 10:29:38 AM To: <[email protected]> cc: Subject: LOC Stephen, ? Was talking to Rick earlier (who is out of the office) and he asked that I pass the message on to you that you can send the LOC to the office.?? I trust that you understand what Rick means.??? Call me if a problem. ? Tony
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
Ashley, This is one resume I got today. I think that it makes sense to invite him for an interview directly with my group. He does not qualify as an analyst candidate. What do you think? Vince ---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 10/24/2000 04:14 PM --------------------------- Rajnish Kamat <[email protected]> on 10/23/2000 07:55:31 PM To: [email protected] cc: Subject: UC-Berkeley Graduate Student Dr. Vincent Kaminski Managing Director and Head of Research Enron Corp. Dear Dr. Kaminski, It was a pleasure talking with you and attending your talk today. I am a graduate student in Industrial Engg. and Operations Research working with Prof. Shmuel Oren on topics in financial instrument pricing and design of contracts in deregulated electricity markets. I am also doing research in auction models and computable equilibrium models with applications in electricity market design. I am planning to graduate with a Ph.D. in May 2001 and would appreciate hearing about any opportunities in your group at Enron. I am attaching at copy of my resume (file: cvrkamat.doc) for your perusal. Thanking you, Sincerely, Rajnish Kamat Graduate Student IEOR, UC-Berkeley 4135, Etcheverry Hall Dept. of Industrial Engineering and Operations Research University of California at Berkeley Berkeley, CA, 94710 - CVRKAMAT.DOC
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
3850, through the wooden doors. Enron North America Corp. From: Mark Dobler 07/28/2000 12:11 PM To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron cc: Mitch Robinson/Corp/Enron@Enron Subject: Re: PRIVILEGED and CONFIDENTIAL Kay - I've included a note on the biration in P1. If it looks good to you, can you please print on ENA letterhead? I'll be over on 29 for a 1:30. Where are you located? I can drop by to sign at that time. MSD
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
-----Original Message----- From: Albrecht, Kristin Sent: Monday, October 08, 2001 9:16 AM To: Vinson, Donald Wayne; White, Stacey W.; Heffernan, Amy; Pearce, Barry; Umbower, Denae; Miralles, Al; Stadler, Gary Subject: FW: THIS is SO COOL! -
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
A single man wanted someone to help him with the household chores, so he decided to get a pet to help out. He went to the local pet shop and asked the owner for advice on a suitable animal. The owner suggested a dog, but the man said, "Nah, dogs can't do dishes." The owner then suggested a cat, but the man said, "Nah, cats can't do the ironing." Finally the owner suggests a centipede, "This is the perfect pet for you. It can do anything!" "OK," the man thought, "I'll give it a try," so he bought it and took it home. Once home he told the centipede to wash the dishes. The centipede looks over and there are piles and piles of dirty dishes that look to be a month old. Five minutes later, all the pots are washed, dried, and put away. "Great," thought the man. Now he told the centipede to do the dusting and vacuuming. Fifteen minutes later the house is spotless. Wow, thought the man, so he decided to try another idea. "Go down to the corner and get me the evening paper," he told the centipede, and off it went. Fifteen minutes later, the centipede hadn't returned. 30 minutes later and still no centipede. Forty-five minutes and the man was sick of waiting, so he got up and went out to look for the centipede. As he opened the front door, there on the step was the centipede. "Hey, whatcha' doing there? I sent you out for the paper 45 minutes ago and now I find you out here without the paper! What gives?" "Hold on a minute!" said the centipede, "I'm still putting on my boots!"
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
A number of you have had a lot of concern about Deferred Compensation that Enron has ceased to pay as a result of the bankruptcy. Maybe we have some good news -- there is a "rumor" out today, in the event you have not heard, from a reliable source, that the Deferred Compensation creditors have moved up from 4th place to a little higher because of the amount of money involved. I have heard that Mike Moran has been placed on the "Creditors Committee." I believe that Mike Moran and Dan Ryser were working together. Part of the rumor indicates that the largest creditors -- primarily the banks -- may buy out the Deferred Compensation creditors "to avoid having to deal with them." That is about all that I have heard at this time, except that the "buyout" may not be 100%.
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
Thanks, Mark. Of course in doing the Reuters telephone interview yesterday morning at Eva's request, for more than an hour, I made all of the critical/ explanatory points, and more, you mention below. The temptation of the quote from the Commission official was obviously irresistible for one of the journalists (Pomeroy) however. On the positive side, however, mention of traders' objections to level and incidence of the proposed tariff, its discriminatory effect, and absence of agreement about implementation in Germany are attributable to my briefing of the other journalist, Orgill. The quoted official is giving the Dominique Ristori (a Commission Energy Policy Director of French nationality) party line, but our "victory" is attributable to decisions taken in the Cabinet of Loyola de Palacio, the Energy Commissioner, with whom I intervened on behalf of EFET two weeks ago, and who had already been confronted in September by British government objections. As such, it no longer matters objectively what M. Ristori and his spokespersons think about the "demise of the 2 euros". As you and I discussed yesterday, we must now move on rapidly to offer an alternative traders/ system users' solution for establishment of non discriminatory cross border transmission tariffs. An EFET paper for this purpose is already in preparation, and I spoke to the Cabinet of Mario Monti (Competition Commissioner) about the principles involved on Wednesday evening this week. Mark Schroeder 10/27/2000 11:52 AM To: Mark Frevert/NA/Enron@Enron, Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron cc: Peter Styles/LON/ECT@ECT, Joe Gold/LON/ECT@ECT, Andrew Morrison/LON/ECT@ECT Subject: EU plans for single power market suffer setback.- Enron Mention- Reuters This article/wire report from Reuters came in yesterday just as I left for a lecture, so I am only now forwarding it to you. Joe tells me that Investor Relations has received some inquiries about "what is going on in Europe" yesterday, due to the bad headline Reuters chose below (aided by a self-serving European Commission official), and Dynegy's Q3 earnings showing red ink for Europe. Ignoring the headline, and the quote from the European Commission civil servant (which I will elaborate upon below), this is a BIG WIN. It is progress for liberalisation, and I intend to tell The Economist just that when I do an interview with a reporter later today. This story is about the DEMISE of the ill-conceived 2Euros/MWh export charge. It stands truth and logic on its head to say, as the unnamed European official does, that the demise of the 2 euros charge was anything like "harmonisation" or that its demise sets back European liberalisattion. It is now much more likely that we will get a charging regime that will maintain or increase trade, and certainly will not set back trade as the 2 euros would have. Just to further de-construct the article, it was never a "single charge" (recall that new entrants disproportionately bore the burden, with many pre-existing contracts (of incumbents, since we did not exist in this market 3+ years ago) being exempt, nor would it contribute to a single market, but rather would have raised barriers to cross-border trade. Moreover, the cost basis for the charge was never made transparent, either. Finally, the rebate scheme likely would have subsidised the incumbents' competition against new entrants. There is a good quote from Peter Styles (and Peter deserves a great deal of recognition for leading the efforts to defeat this). If you read the article, not the headline and European Commission official quote, you can see the other arguments against it, including the claim by German industrial consumers that it would have raised their prices by 10%. Any message from PR or Investor Relations must be that this is a victory in the march towards a fully liberalised market, and a win for consumers. The reason a European ommission official would say what they did is that they have been complicit in the German/Franco conspiracy to impose the 2 euros charge, and probably felt compelled to save face by saying this is a setback; otherwise, one would ask why were they working on/supporting something so deleterious to the development of the market?! Apologies for being a bit lengthy, but I wrote this hopefully with sufficient detail that if you want to forward this to either PR or Investor Relations, they will be armed with enough info that they can respond to further inquiries. By the way, we had an inkling of this via telephone coversation I had with UK DTI three days ago (communicated immediately to traders, just did not have time to summarise in an e-mail to you). I will be summarising my conversation with UK DTI momentarily, even though it is 3 days old, because I will be adding some of her commentary on the wider political lay of the land, which I think you will want to read for the "big picture" of European machinations. let me know if you need more. thanks mcs ---------------------- Forwarded by Mark Schroeder/LON/ECT on 27/10/2000 10:36 --------------------------- Iona Maclean 26/10/2000 17:35 To: Peter Styles/LON/ECT@ECT, Jackie Gentle/LON/ECT@ECT, John Sherriff/LON/ECT@ECT, Michael R Brown/LON/ECT@ECT, Eva Hoeffelman/LON/ECT@ECT, Mark Schroeder/LON/ECT@ECT, Joe Gold/LON/ECT@ECT, Andreas Radmacher/FRA/ECT@ECT, Paul Hennemeyer/LON/ECT@ECT, [email protected], Viviana Florio/FRA/ECT@ECT, Christopher McKey/FRA/ECT@ECT, Bart Lyon/LON/ECT@ECT, Peter Kreuzberg/FRA/ECT@ECT, Sven Becker/FRA/ECT@ECT, Gregor Baumerich/LON/ECT@ECT, John Oliver/LON/ECT@ECT cc: Subject: EU plans for single power market suffer setback.- Enron Mention- Reuters ---------------------- Forwarded by Iona Maclean/LON/ECT on 26/10/2000 17:35 --------------------------- Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp. From: [email protected] 26/10/2000 18:22 Please respond to [email protected] To: [email protected] cc: Subject: Enron Reuters folder: UK: EU plans for single power market suffer setback. UK: EU plans for single power market suffer setback. By Margaret Orgill 10/26/2000 Reuters English News Service (C) Reuters Limited 2000. LONDON, Oct 26 (Reuters) - European Union hopes for a single electricity market have suffered a setback after power companies and consumers failed to agree a system for harmonising cross-border transmission tariffs, said officials on Thursday. Plans to introduce a single tariff for access to the west European grid by November 1 have been postponed because of misgivings, particularly from some power producers, said a European Union source. "It seems that we have more problems than expected and the European Commission could have to go for legislation," said the official, who declined to be named. The tariff is a voluntary proposal by western European grid operators to harmonise cross border charges and create a single regional power market. The official declined to give more details of the producers' doubts but traders are opposed to the fee which they say is too high and will stifle the emerging European power trading market. The proposal has also run into legal problems in Germany where its introduction would require changes to an industry agreement on access to the regional electricity grid. German consumer bodies are unlikely to accept the new tariff which will add around 10 percent to wholesale power prices. "The VIK, which represents industrial consumers, has already written to the Commission saying they will not accept this fee," said Einar Vestra, managing director of the trading division at Mannheim-based utility MVV. TARIFF TO BE DISCUSSED BY EU, INDUSTRY The tariff will be discussed by the so-called Florence group, which includes EU officials, government and industry representatives, which is due to meet again on November 9-10. If the voluntary approach does not work, Brussels may decide to include provisions on cross-border transmission in a forthcoming directive to speed up the opening of Europe's electricity markets. Grid operators have proposed a flat charge of two euros per megawatt hour for exports regardless of how many borders the power crosses, instead of charging a fee at each frontier. The funds from the tariff will be put in a central pot and divided among grid owners to reimburse network transit costs, estimated at around 200 million euros a year. Traders argue the fee is too expensive and object to the fact the grid companies want to charge it only on new contracts and exempt existing long-term contracts. "An export-related transmission fee was misconceived in the first place," said Peter Styles, vice president of European government affairs at U.S. utility Enron. "The priority in the Florence process should be greater harmonisation between access regimes in member states...with a view of achieving transmission tariffs which include cross border access." (Additional reporting by Robin Pomeroy). Folder Name: Enron Reuters folder Relevance Score on Scale of 100: 82 ______________________________________________________________________ To review or revise your folder, visit http://www.djinteractive.com or contact Dow Jones Customer Service by e-mail at [email protected] or by phone at 800-369-7466. (Outside the U.S. and Canada, call 609-452-1511 or contact your local sales representative.) ______________________________________________________________________ Copyright (c) 2000 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
Did I send this to you already ? ---------------------- Forwarded by Barry Tycholiz/CAL/ECT on 11/27/2000 10:32 AM --------------------------- Barry Tycholiz 11/23/2000 03:51 PM To: [email protected] cc: Subject: Enron - PGT Payout Table Brad, further to our conversation of yesterday morning, please find attached Enron's payout table and alternative payout table regarding the permanent assignment of PGT capacity. The onus will be on Enron to deliver long dated capacity to Calpine and we will begin working on this immediately. Below is a summary of some of the key next steps. Please review and we can discuss on Monday the numbers and final steps as required. ENA and Calpine will formalise % discount, volume grid, lump sum $ amount or annuity amount. As discussed our cost of funds implied will be LIBOR + 200 basis points. ( to be confirmed ). ENA will raise a precedent agreement with option language in favor of Calpine which allows you to request that the period 2 volume be no less than the period 1 volume and up to the total delivered volume of 67,500 based on the agreed to % discount as referenced in point #1. ENA will forward the draft precedent agreement which will include the necessary conditions precedent required and with the general commercial terms as agreed per items above (ETA - Tues/Wed). ENA will provide a bid to Calpine on Monday afternoon with a number on the Spark Spread proposal. Contact name @ Trans Canada and ANG is Kay Coad Ph: 403-267-2480. I trust the information as provided above is consistent with our previous discussions. Please contact me once you have had a chance to review. Regards, BT
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
Gerald -- I left you a voice mail regarding the attached amendment to the ECS Agreement. We would like to get this finalized as soon as possible. Bascially, the changes just clean up certain terms --- necessary as a result of the change of the engineering configuration. You may recall we discussed some of the necessary changes with you and Mark in Rob Kilmer's office a few weeks ago. Also -- I have incorporated the June amendment into this document -- so we won't have to keep track of more than one amendment. Because we changed "Compressor Motor" to "Compressor Driver" we need to make this change in the other two documents. I am uncertain if I have the last version of these documents. Could you forward them to me by E-mail? Thanks. Please call me or Teb if you have questions.
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
thanks a million.
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
It looks like we have our 12 teams. We will probably keep the same rules from last year unless anybody has an objection. Still to be determined are league fees, draft date , and free agent pickup protocol. I suggest that we draft on August 27th at the Enron building on floor 26. For those of you that can't make it, you can draft over the internet. We will be using cbs sportsline again - I think that will be $8/person. Let me know if anyone has a problem with the draft date, i.e. can't make it, too early, too late. If not, THE MEXIMULLETS look forward to a return to Prominence this year. You all do not stand a chance! -Eric
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
----- Forwarded by Tana Jones/HOU/ECT on 04/25/2001 04:56 PM ----- Walter Guidroz/ENRON@enronXgate 04/25/2001 04:53 PM To: Karen Lambert/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Samuel Schott/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brant Reves/ENRON@enronXgate, Debbie R Brackett/HOU/ECT@ECT, David Hardy/LON/ECT@ECT, Lesli Campbell/ENRON@enronXgate, Cynthia Clark/ENRON@enronXgate, Enron Europe Global CounterParty/LON/ECT@ECT, Stephanie Sever/ENRON@enronXgate, Tom Moran/ENRON@enronXgate, Claudia Clark/ENRON@enronXgate, William S Bradford/ENRON@enronXgate, Lisa Lees/ENRON@enronXgate, Juana Fayett/Corp/Enron@Enron, Jana Morse/Corp/Enron@Enron, Trang Le/HOU/ECT@ECT, Paul Maley/LON/ECT@ECT, Sonya Clarke/LON/ECT@ECT, Tim Davies/LON/ECT@ECT, Karen O'Day/ENRON@enronXgate, Tanya Rohauer/ENRON@enronXgate, Kelly Lombardi/NA/Enron@Enron, Brian Lindsay/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, EOL Call Center@ECT, Bill D Hare/HOU/ECT@ect, Amy Heffernan/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Molly LaFuze/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Danny Clark/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Stephanie Panus/NA/Enron@Enron, Teresa Mandola/ENRON@enronXgate, Bill Kyle/ENRON@enronXgate, Amber Ebow/HOU/ECT@ECT cc: Subject: EOL approvals, 04-25-01 Please see attached.
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
Jesus, Please show me a bid for this Cargill Deal. It is 25 MMBtu/d day, May-October, 2001 with balancing and anything else that typically goes along with it. I think the best option at this time is just ot get a bid from you. Also there is a piece at Nicor that goes along with it, but it is a monthly volume commitment, and does not include balancing. I don't plan to give you that portion, but it may be that the customer does not want it broken up. The volume is roughly 33,000 for the month. Thanks
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
I'm not sure why you're seeing a price of $65.70 come through on this deal, but I'm looking at the deal in EnPower right now and I see a price of $65. If you could let me know what report is showing the incorrect price, I might be able to figure out why. Thanks, Kate Judy Dyer@EES 04/17/2001 08:16 AM To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT cc: Subject: Real Time Your deal # 581358.1 is showing a price of 65.70 but on the Real Time spreadsheet, I see 65.00. Which is correct? Thanks for you help Judy
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
The report named: <http://trv.dev.corp.enron.com/linkFromExcel.asp?report_cd=8&report_name =FT+-+Texas+P/L&category_cd=4&category_name=TEXAS&toc_hide=1&sTV1=4&TV1E xp=Y&current_efct_date=05/29/2001> FT - Texas P/L, published as of 05/29/2001 is now available for viewing on the website.
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
absolutely. see you on sat around 530. ps - wildfires not just there - I've heard as well over here. Congratulations
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
Kay, Here is the Cover Sheet and Attachments for the above C/P. I wasn't sure about the due diligence on the "agency relationship" so was unsure as to whether to put those riders in. I have attached those riders so you can advise me. The Agreement is housed in your directory minus the General Terms and Conditions. When you are ready to send the Agreement then I can attach the GTC. Thanks, Genia
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
Attached is the agenda for next week's offsite meeting. Please prepare your Power Point presentations and forward them to Tina Spiller by 10:00 a.m. on Tuesday, May 29, 2001. (Only those people on the agenda will be presenting at the meeting). Others are invited guests. Thanks very much for your assistance. Peggy McCurley Office of the Chairman Enron Net Works (713) 853-1832 [email protected]
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
The FINAL Violation Memos for 11/26/01 have been published and are available for viewing on the ERV: http:\\erv.corp.enron.com - Violation/Notification memo Section.
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
Start Date: 4/9/01; HourAhead hour: 24; No ancillary schedules awarded. Variances detected. Variances detected in Generation schedule. Variances detected in SC Trades schedule. Variances detected in Load schedule. LOG MESSAGES: PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final Schedules\2001040924.txt ---- Generation Schedule ---- $$$ Variance found in table tblGEN_SCHEDULE. Details: (Hour: 24 / Preferred: 4.00 / Final: 3.97) TRANS_TYPE: FINAL SC_ID: SierraPowe MKT_TYPE: 2 TRANS_DATE: 4/9/01 UNIT_ID: VESTAL_6_WDFIRE $$$ Variance found in table tblGEN_SCHEDULE. Details: (Hour: 24 / Preferred: 21.19 / Final: 25.75) TRANS_TYPE: FINAL SC_ID: TOSCO MKT_TYPE: 2 TRANS_DATE: 4/9/01 UNIT_ID: UNCHEM_1_UNIT ---- Energy Import/Export Schedule ---- *** Final schedule not found for preferred schedule. Details: TRANS_TYPE: FINAL SC_ID: ECTRT MKT_TYPE: 2 TRANS_DATE: 4/9/01 TIE_POINT: PVERDE_5_DEVERS INTERCHG_ID: EPMI_CISO_OZZY ENGY_TYPE: FIRM ---- SC Trades Schedule ---- $$$ Variance found in table tblInt_Interchange. Details: (Hour: 24 / Preferred: -25.00 / Final: -24.97) TRANS_TYPE: FINAL SC_ID: EPMI MKT_TYPE: 2 TRANS_DATE: 4/9/01 TRADING_SC: AEI1 PNT_OF_INTRC: NP15 SCHED_TYPE: ENGY PURCH_SALE: 1 DEAL_NO: 1 $$$ Variance found in table tblInt_Interchange. Details: (Hour: 24 / Preferred: -45.00 / Final: -25.00) TRANS_TYPE: FINAL SC_ID: EPMI MKT_TYPE: 2 TRANS_DATE: 4/9/01 TRADING_SC: EPPS PNT_OF_INTRC: SP15 SCHED_TYPE: ENGY PURCH_SALE: 1 DEAL_NO: 1 ---- Load Schedule ---- $$$ Variance found in table tblLoads. Details: (Hour: 24 / Preferred: 0.45 / Final: 0.30) TRANS_TYPE: FINAL LOAD_ID: PGE1 MKT_TYPE: 2 TRANS_DATE: 4/9/01 SC_ID: EPMI $$$ Variance found in table tblLoads. Details: (Hour: 24 / Preferred: 4.87 / Final: 3.51) TRANS_TYPE: FINAL LOAD_ID: PGE2 MKT_TYPE: 2 TRANS_DATE: 4/9/01 SC_ID: EPMI $$$ Variance found in table tblLoads. Details: (Hour: 24 / Preferred: 44.58 / Final: 31.23) TRANS_TYPE: FINAL LOAD_ID: PGE3 MKT_TYPE: 2 TRANS_DATE: 4/9/01 SC_ID: EPMI $$$ Variance found in table tblLoads. Details: (Hour: 24 / Preferred: 2.02 / Final: 1.47) TRANS_TYPE: FINAL LOAD_ID: PGE4 MKT_TYPE: 2 TRANS_DATE: 4/9/01 SC_ID: EPMI $$$ Variance found in table tblLoads. Details: (Hour: 24 / Preferred: 100.23 / Final: 100.20) TRANS_TYPE: FINAL LOAD_ID: SDG1 MKT_TYPE: 2 TRANS_DATE: 4/9/01 SC_ID: EPMI
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
Sheila and Kelly, I am working with Sara Shackleton for the next few months (on loan from Andrews & Kurth). This morning I am sending comments to the above-referenced Agreement to both Chase H&Q and Thomas Weisel. Please also note that Sara sent comments out yesterday to Direct Trading on the Customer Agreement. Should you have any questions, my extension is 3-9720. Jason Peters
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
We just sent this back to TVA and SERC. Based on TVA's 8/4/99 letter to NERC (in response to Jeff's 8/31 letter), it appears that TVA has no intention of agreeing to allow Enron to sink at the control areas. Elizabeth and I will have the letter to Howard Hawk ready for 5:00 for Jeff. ---------------------- Forwarded by Christi L Nicolay/HOU/ECT on 10/06/99 02:57 PM --------------------------- From: Christi L Nicolay 10/06/99 02:57 PM To: [email protected], [email protected] cc: Richard Ingersoll/HOU/ECT@ECT Subject: SERC/TVA/Enron agreement Attached is a redlined version of Enron's response to TVA's proposal of this morning. Enron will agree to disaggregate the control area numbers (we have revised the examples accordingly) and Enron will agree to remove the Gleason facility. Christi Nicolay 713-853-7007 for Dick IngersollPlease use LAUNCH to view redlined copies.
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
I'm not sure about Sat - Grant has been trying to get a sitter - he called Lynne and Cecilia. Are you going?
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
Start Date: 12/23/01; HourAhead hour: 24; No ancillary schedules awarded. No variances detected. LOG MESSAGES: PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final Schedules\2001122324.txt
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
I have trawled through the list of jurisdictions of potential counterparties to the freight swaps/options. A list Norway Denmark Germany Switzerland UK Belgium France Netherlands Singapore Australia We have already done full EOL due diligence on the above jurisdictions. The only issue which we wd just need to cover is whether for regulatory purposes freight is treated as a commodity. We shd be able to get answers on that issue quickly. B list Turkey Taiwan Japan Argentina Israel Gibraltar S. Korea We do not have much on the above jurisdictions here although Mark T may have done some due diligence on the non- European, non-middle eastern countries. Do you want us to undertake full due diligence on these? C list Liberia Panama Cayman Isl BVI Bermuda Bahamas BWI I understand that decisions may have already been made not to include entities incorporated into these jurisdictions, because of money laundering issues, lack of corporate transparency etc. Cd this be confirmed. Many thanks Robert
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
Dear Advisory Board member, Thank you for your continued support of the CECs initiative: Environmental Challenges and Opportunities of the Evolving Continental Electricity Market. Please find attached the following documents for your review: 1) The proceedings of the last conference call 2) Key issues of the initiative 3) A preliminary draft agenda of the upcoming CEC sponsored Symposium We welcome your comments and suggestions on the above documents. In particular additions or edits to the key issues document as well as possible speakers and/or participants for the upcoming Symposium, would be appreciated. Please direct any comments to [email protected] (514-350-4368). On behalf of my colleagues at the CEC, Sincerely, Yolanda Clegg - Synopsis and Outcomes of call.doc - key issues.doc - draft agenda1.doc
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
GT, Was that an ass kicking or what? The game look like a blast on TV. I am still pissed I missed it. Did you get the tickets okay? Hope so. How was the Tailgate? Any sweet sweet babies?
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
Bob: Bill Bradford and I have a phone call with PG&E at noon tomorrow. We will advise everyone of what we learn. Michael -----Original Message----- From: Williams, Robert C. Sent: Wednesday, May 23, 2001 5:33 PM To: Tribolet, Michael; Buy, Rick; Gorte, David; Bradford, William S.; Kean, Steven; Shapiro, Richard; Steffes, James; Kingerski, Harry; Koenig, Mark; Palmer, Mark; Denne, Karen; Haedicke, Mark; Mellencamp, Lisa; Sager, Elizabeth; McCullough, Travis; Sharp, Vicki; Smith, Mike; Curry, Wanda; Dasovich, Jeff; Mara, Susan; '[email protected]'; '[email protected]'; Whalley, Greg; Lavorato, John; Delainey, David; Dietrich, Janet; Sunde, Marty; Leff, Dan Subject: RE: PX credits & Schedule F in the PG&E bankruptcy Michael, how can we get with PG&E to determine where the discrepancy lies? -----Original Message----- From: Tribolet, Michael Sent: Wednesday, May 23, 2001 3:02 PM To: Buy, Rick; Gorte, David; Bradford, William S.; Kean, Steven; Shapiro, Richard; Steffes, James; Kingerski, Harry; Koenig, Mark; Palmer, Mark; Denne, Karen; Haedicke, Mark; Mellencamp, Lisa; Sager, Elizabeth; McCullough, Travis; Sharp, Vicki; Smith, Mike; Williams, Robert C.; Curry, Wanda; Dasovich, Jeff; Mara, Susan; '[email protected]'; '[email protected]'; Whalley, Greg; Lavorato, John; Delainey, David; Dietrich, Janet; Sunde, Marty; Leff, Dan Subject: PX credits & Schedule F in the PG&E bankruptcy PG&E filed their Schedule F which displays its nonpriority unsecured claims. Many of the claims were listed as unknown in amount. The PX credit amounts were listed as disputed. Two PX credit amounts were specified in the Schedule F: Enron Energy Marketing $201,964,905.64 Enron Energy Services $ 19,737,979.97 Total disclosed PX credit $221,702,885.61 Note that in the claims that were listed as unknown in amount, none were described as PX Credit in nature. Two points to be made: 1) this information is now public (but on page 5,066 of 17,096 on a CD), along with $53,985,167 in other Enron related claims, and 2) our calculation of the PX credit was $392,416,534 at the beginning of May. Regards, Michael
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
Nav, How are you doing? What are you doing? I am still working for Enron. I have been trading nat gas for about 3 years. I am moving to Houston at the end of the month. In my next life I am going to be trading electricity in the NE US. Should be interesting. Crazy volatility. I will probably have a heart attack at 26 but that's life. Hope things are going well for you. w/b Chris Dorland
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
louise, thanks so much for taking the time to talk with us today [most informative!], to send us these materials, and to introduce us to kal. we shall send you our darfts to review for your approval before we go to print. david -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Friday, July 06, 2001 03:23 PM To: Dgautschi Cc: [email protected] Subject: Interview Due to size presentations to come one at a time ---------------------- Forwarded by Louise Kitchen/HOU/ECT on 07/06/2001 05:20 PM --------------------------- Louise Kitchen 07/06/2001 05:11 PM To: [email protected] cc: Kal Shah/Enron@EnronXGate Subject: Interview Kal, Please provide David with as many statistics as he needs for his book. Could you also make sure that David gets help in turning around any comments on any quotes etc he may want to use for his book as I understand they have some pretty short timescales. I have attached a couple of recent presentations and the old presentation from the analyst conference in January. (See attached file: extendedEOL.ppt) Thanks Louise This message (including any attachments) contains confidential information intended for a specific individual and purpose, and is protected by law. If you are not the intended recipient, you should delete this message and are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, or distribution of this message, or the taking of any action based on it, is strictly prohibited.
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }
Attached is the security document form. Section 5.4 is missing and I will provide tommorrow. However, in the interest of time I am forwarding the agreement for review.
{ "pile_set_name": "Enron Emails" }