text
stringlengths 1
1.59M
| meta
dict |
|---|---|
Yes - this is Nevada Power - it's been changed.
Kerri Thompson@ENRON
02/15/2001 11:36 AM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: tfs
523027 broker has nevada power for the cp name | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Sorry about that. No, they're financial. thanks!
From: Tana Jones@ECT on 03/20/2001 04:15 PM
To: Kimberly Hundl/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:
Subject: Re: Coral Energy Holding Deals #550402 & 550229
Are these physical transactions?
Kimberly Hundl@ENRON
03/20/2001 04:12 PM
To: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Melissa Ann Murphy/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Coral Energy Holding Deals #550402 & 550229
Hi Tana,
These are the EOL deals that were erroneously entered under Coral Power LLC,
they were actually done with Coral Energy Holding LP
550402:
Buyer: Coral Energy Holding LP
Seller: Enron North America
Delivery Point: NYISO Zone G (HUD VL)
Term: 3/19/01 - 3/23/01, M-F EPT, HE 8-23
Volume: 50
Fixed Price: $54.50
Index: Hudson Valley NY Zone G
550229:
Buyer: Coral Energy Holding LP
Seller: Enron North America
Delivery Point: NYISO Zone A (West)
Term: 3/16/01 - 3/16/01, Fri., EPT, HE 8-23
Volume: 50
Fixed Price: $37.75
Index: NY Zone A (West)
Please let me know if you need additional information.
Thank you for your help!
Kimberly Hundl
Power Documentation x31647 | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Thanks for the help.
I have put several products out for your approval.
Thanks,
Eric
Robert B Cass
11/27/2000 04:22 PM
To: Eric Bass/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Melba Lozano/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: New Product
Hi Eric -
I have just been advised that the new Index that you requested (as detailed
below) is now available for you to create as a product.
Thanks for letting us work with you.
- Rob
x35491
---------------------- Forwarded by Robert B Cass/HOU/ECT on 11/27/2000 03:00
PM ---------------------------
Robert B Cass
11/22/2000 09:41 AM
To: Eric Bass/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Melba Lozano/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dawn C Kenne/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: New Product
Hi Eric -
We will begin testing your index today. The description for your index will
read as follows:
"The Index for a day shall be the Daily Midpoint price published on such
calendar day under the heading "Daily Price Survey" in the
East-Houston-Katy, Katy plant tailgate section of Gas Daily, or if a calendar
day is not a Business Day then the price used shall be the Daily Midpoint
price published on the next suceeding Business Day. "
The Product Short Description on the website will be as follows:
US Gas Daily KatyPltTailgate Month/Year USD/MM
Please advise if this does not meet with your approval.
Thanks -
Rob
Enron North America Corp.
From: Eric Bass 11/21/2000 12:48 PM
To: Robert B Cass/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Dale Neuner/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: New Product
Rob,
I need to get a new gas daily product created. This product will be settled
daily against the Katy Plant Tailgate under the East-Houston-Katy subheading
in Gas Daily.
Call with questions.
Thanks,
Eric
x3-0977 | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------
W E E K E N D S Y S T E M S A V A I L A B I L I T Y
F O R
March 30, 2001 5:00pm through April 2, 2001 12:00am
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------
SCHEDULED SYSTEM OUTAGES:
ARDMORE DATA CENTER - FACILITY OPERATIONS: No Scheduled Outages.
AZURIX: No Scheduled Outages.
EB34 DATA CENTER - FACILITY OPERATIONS: No Scheduled Outages.
EDI SERVER: No Scheduled Outages.
ENRON NORTH AMERICAN LANS:
Impact: CORP
Time: Sat 3/31/2001 at 9:00:00 AM CT thru Sat 3/31/2001 at 1:00:00 PM CT
Sat 3/31/2001 at 7:00:00 AM PT thru Sat 3/31/2001 at 11:00:00 AM PT
Sat 3/31/2001 at 4:00:00 PM London thru Sat 3/31/2001 at 8:00:00 PM London
Outage: Network Change on EB4
Environments Impacted: Personel on EBB1-EB4
Purpose: Network 172.16.231.0 is deleted from the network
Backout:
Contact(s): Mark Trevino 713-345-9954
FIELD SERVICES: No Scheduled Outages.
INTERNET: No Scheduled Outages.
MESSAGING: No Scheduled Outages.
MARKET DATA: No Scheduled Outages.
NT: No Scheduled Outages.
OS/2: No Scheduled Outages.
OTHER SYSTEMS:
Impact: CORP
Time: Sun 4/1/2001 at 9:00:00 AM CT thru Sun 4/1/2001 at 9:00:00 PM CT
Sun 4/1/2001 at 7:00:00 AM PT thru Sun 4/1/2001 at 7:00:00 PM PT
Sun 4/1/2001 at 3:00:00 PM London thru Mon 4/2/2001 at 3:00:00 AM London
Outage: OS upgrade, data migration to new T-3 disk, migration off fddi. New
IP address will be 172.16.63.63
Environments Impacted: astral Development database users
Purpose: Need for addition storage, corporate direction to migrate off fddi,
general maintenance.
Backout: change the primary interface back to fddi
change the DNS entry back to the original
shutdown the server and restart using the original disks only.
Contact(s): Malcolm Wells 713-345-3716
Impact: CORP
Time: Sat 3/31/2001 at 11:00:00 AM CT thru Sat 3/31/2001 at 1:00:00 PM CT
Sat 3/31/2001 at 9:00:00 AM PT thru Sat 3/31/2001 at 11:00:00 AM PT
Sat 3/31/2001 at 6:00:00 PM London thru Sat 3/31/2001 at 8:00:00 PM London
Outage: Migration off fddi for server limbo. New IP Address is 172.16.2.157
Environments Impacted: Lim database users
Purpose: Corporate direction to move off fddi.
Backout: Change the primary interface back to fddi
Change DNS to original setting
Contact(s): Malcolm Wells 713-345-3716
Impact: CORP
Time: Sat 3/31/2001 at 2:00:00 PM CT thru Sat 3/31/2001 at 4:00:00 PM CT
Sat 3/31/2001 at 12:00:00 PM PT thru Sat 3/31/2001 at 2:00:00 PM PT
Sat 3/31/2001 at 9:00:00 PM London thru Sat 3/31/2001 at 11:00:00 PM London
Outage: Migration off fddi and dual boot update for server ocs-m. New IP
address to be 172.16.2.158
Environments Impacted: SysAdmiral
Purpose: Corporate direction to move off fddi and general maintenance.
Backout: change primary network interface back to fddi
Contact(s): Malcolm Wells 713-345-3716
Impact: CORP
Time: Sat 3/31/2001 at 2:00:00 PM CT thru Sat 3/31/2001 at 4:00:00 PM CT
Sat 3/31/2001 at 12:00:00 PM PT thru Sat 3/31/2001 at 2:00:00 PM PT
Sat 3/31/2001 at 9:00:00 PM London thru Sat 3/31/2001 at 11:00:00 PM
London
Outage: Migration off fddi for server ossprod. New IP address will be
172.16.2.159
Environments Impacted: SUN OS application users
Purpose: Corporate direction to move off fddi.
Backout: change primary interface back to the fddi
Contact(s): Malcolm Wells 713-345-3716
Impact: CORP
Time: Sat 3/31/2001 at 3:00:00 PM CT thru Sat 3/31/2001 at 5:00:00 PM CT
Sat 3/31/2001 at 1:00:00 PM PT thru Sat 3/31/2001 at 3:00:00 PM PT
Sat 3/31/2001 at 10:00:00 PM London thru Sun 4/1/2001 at 12:00:00 AM London
Outage: Migration off fddi for server utopia. New IP address will be
172.16.2.163.
Environments Impacted: RMS
Purpose: Corporate direction to move off fddi.
Backout: change primary interface back to fddi
change DNS entry back to original
Contact(s): Malcolm Wells 713-345-3716
Impact: CORP
Time: Sat 3/31/2001 at 4:00:00 PM CT thru Sat 3/31/2001 at 6:00:00 PM CT
Sat 3/31/2001 at 2:00:00 PM PT thru Sat 3/31/2001 at 4:00:00 PM PT
Sat 3/31/2001 at 11:00:00 PM London thru Sun 4/1/2001 at 1:00:00 AM London
Outage: Migration of server zodiac off fddi and dual boot addition. New IP
address to be 172.16.2.160
Environments Impacted: zodiac application users
Purpose: corporate direction to move off fddi and general maintenance.
Backout: change the primary interface back to the fddi
change DNS entry to old entry
Contact(s): Malcolm Wells 713-345-3716
Impact: UNIX
Time: Sat 3/31/2001 at 1:00:00 PM CT thru Sat 3/31/2001 at 3:00:00 PM CT
Sat 3/31/2001 at 11:00:00 AM PT thru Sat 3/31/2001 at 1:00:00 PM PT
Sat 3/31/2001 at 8:00:00 PM London thru Sat 3/31/2001 at 10:00:00 PM London
Outage: Migration off fddi and patch updates for server gemini. New IP
address to be 172.16.2.162
Environments Impacted: UNIX sysamins
Purpose: Corporate direction to move off fddi and general maintenance.
Backout: change primary interface back to fddi.
Change DNS entry back to old entry
Contact(s): Malcolm Wells 713-345-3716
SITARA: No Scheduled Outages.
SUN/OSS SYSTEM: No Scheduled Outages.
TELEPHONY:
Impact: All
Time: Fri 3/30/2001 at 7:00:00 PM CT thru Sat 3/31/2001 at 7:00:00 AM CT
Fri 3/30/2001 at 5:00:00 PM PT thru Sat 3/31/2001 at 5:00:00 AM PT
Sat 3/31/2001 at 2:00:00 AM London thru Sat 3/31/2001 at 2:00:00 PM london
Outage: Lucent Switch ATM Conversion - UPDATE!!
Environments Impacted: All telephone systems including voicemail will be
out. 3AC & 2AC switch will be taken down at 7 PM and EB at 10:30 PM
Purpose: Upgrade will allow for more bandwidth between switches (EB, 3AC,
ECS, 500 Jefferson, etc.) and to prepare for the Enron Center South system.
Backout: Revert back to fiber network.
Contact(s): Cynthia Siniard 713-853-0558
TERMINAL SERVER: No Scheduled Outages.
UNIFY: No Scheduled Outages.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------
FOR ASSISTANCE
(713) 853-1411 Enron Resolution Center
Specific Help:
Information Risk Management (713) 853-5536
Unify On-Call (713) 284-3757 [Pager]
Sitara On-Call (713) 288-0101 [Pager]
RUS/GOPS/GeoTools/APRS (713) 639-9726 [Pager]
OSS/UA4/TARP (713) 285-3165 [Pager]
CPR (713) 284-4175 [Pager]
EDI Support (713) 327-3893 [Pager]
EES Help Desk (713)853-9797 OR (888)853-9797 | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
This memo follows up on our discussion this morning.
With respect to the 15 million of increased VAR that the Board allocated to
Rick Buy and Jeff Skilling I propose the following:
1. 5 Million be allocated to EES and therefore remove EES's positions from
the Wholesale gas and power groups (This has already been done).
2. Move the control and decision making of 5 Million of VAR each to the
trading heads of North America (Lavorato) and Europe (Sherriff).
3. With respect to North America I intend to create a group called the
"Cross Commodity Trading Group" which will warehouse the 5 Million of VAR and
use it as it sees fit (I will run this group and currently be the only
employee). This will start out as an administrative structure to use if we
need to throw more VAR at certain positions (I see the individual trading
groups staying within their VAR limits). However, I do see the need for a
true cross commodity group that would search for low risk / high probability
trades accross the commodities that we trade. This structure may help to
start us down this path.
Please let me know what you think.
John | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
---------------------- Forwarded by Tori Kuykendall/HOU/ECT on 01/24/2001
02:27 PM ---------------------------
Tori Kuykendall
01/24/2001 02:21 PM
To: Matt Smith/NA/Enron@ENRON
cc:
Subject: tds | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
George,
Can you look into this?
D
---------------------- Forwarded by Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT on 05/18/2000
06:41 AM ---------------------------
From: Stephanie Gomes 05/17/2000 02:14 PM
To: Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Cannon Interest May 2000 Purchase
Hi Daren,
I received an email from Kenny Soignet to make sure everything was in the
system for me to pay Cannon on Friday, 5/19/00.
The deal # is 257141. I see that the volume has not been scheduled, so
therefore it is not pulling into unify for me to pay.
Are you the person that will be able to schedule the volume in order for me
to pull up this deal?
( I see that in sitara that the deal is set for 5/00 production, does that
matter? )
Thanks, Stephanie ( 3-6004 )
---------------------- Forwarded by Stephanie Gomes/HOU/ECT on 05/17/2000
02:06 PM ---------------------------
Enron Capital Management
From: David Baumbach 05/17/2000 01:50 PM
To: Stephanie Gomes/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Cannon Interest May 2000 Purchase
The purchase from Cannon is on Sitara deal # 257141 and the sale to CPR
Storage is on Sitara deal # 257144.
Dave | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Jim,
here are the articles I found regarding offers made from Enron. Sorry, I
placed these in your chair on Friday, and I didn't realize that you were not
in the office.
James D Steffes@ENRON
03/20/2001 12:02 PM
To: Miyung Buster/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc:
Subject: Summary of Supply Offers in California
Any luck on public information about offers last year?
Jim
----- Forwarded by James D Steffes/NA/Enron on 03/20/2001 12:02 PM -----
Jeff Dasovich
Sent by: Jeff Dasovich
03/19/2001 08:24 PM
To: James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron,
[email protected], Susan J Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON, Sandra McCubbin/NA/Enron@Enron,
Susan J Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON, Harry Kingerski/NA/Enron@Enron, Paul
Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT, Janel Guerrero/Corp/Enron@Enron, Karen
Denne/Corp/Enron@ENRON, [email protected], Alan Comnes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Summary of Supply Offers in California
Jim:
Attached is a fairly distilled summary of the projects Enron's offered to the
utilities, DWR and the ISO over the past 9-12 months, or so. With respect to
the power contracts offered to the IOUs, only the offers accepted by PG&E and
Edison are included---the desk doesn't keep records of offers rejected, only
offers accepted. However, I'm fairly confident that I can dig deeper and get
more info on the other power deals offered to Edison, PG&E and SDG&E if folks
would like that information. Just let me know. Prices are included for the
offers that had prices attached when submitted.
Best,
Jeff | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
(See attached file: HPLN0314.xls)
- HPLN0314.xls | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Please note, the Resolution Center hours have been reduced to 6 a.m. - 7 p.m. Monday thru Friday. You may contact the Resolution Center at 713-853-1411 or submit requests on-line at http://itcentral.enron.com.
We appreciate your cooperation in advance.
Customer and Business Services
Global Infrastructure | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
thanks!! that is what I said!!!
Daren J Farmer
11/09/2000 02:00 PM
To: Mary Jo Johnson/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Driscoll Ranch #3 Gas pricing and interconnect estimate
The notice should be given on Monday, the 20th by 5:00 pm.
D
From: Mary Jo Johnson 11/09/2000 10:12 AM
To: Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Driscoll Ranch #3 Gas pricing and interconnect estimate
Can you help me out on this Darren? MJJ
---------------------- Forwarded by Mary Jo Johnson/HOU/ECT on 11/09/2000
10:04 AM ---------------------------
"John Daugherty" <[email protected]> on 11/08/2000 04:38:37 PM
To: <[email protected]>
cc:
Subject: Re: Driscoll Ranch #3 Gas pricing and interconnect estimate
Mary Jo,
Thanks for the update. Regarding the notice provision of 6 business days
prior to the close of business on the last business day of the month prior
to selected month, does that mean we need to give you notice for December
by Tuesday, November 21st at 5:00 PM or Monday, November 20th at 5:00 PM
assuming the 23rd and 24th are holidays?
John Daugherty
----- Original Message -----
From: <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Cc: <[email protected]>; <[email protected]>;
<[email protected]>; <[email protected]>;
<[email protected]>; <[email protected]>;
<[email protected]>; <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, November 08, 2000 5:12 PM
Subject: Re: Driscoll Ranch #3 Gas pricing and interconnect estimate | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
We may find out today so hold the Master. We are waiting for Lehman to
revise the confirm and the Lehman trader (Paul Rosica) was going to "clean
up" behind his attorney to make sure that there are really not any other
changes to the Schedule! Paul has been traveling for the last two days and
should be back in the office today. Clint Freeland (our trader) will let us
know more. SS
Stephanie Panus@ENRON
11/03/2000 08:41 AM
To: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Lehman
Sara,
We revised the Master to include the Moody's ratings. Do I need to send it
to Lehman or hold onto it for now? I think you were going to call the Lehman
trader to discuss.
Thanks. | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Sally -
Are you available for this meeting? And should we ask John L. to come?
Also, I had at least 5 people here past midnight on Thursday. Let me know
your thought on how we should proceed with this.
Thanks
---------------------- Forwarded by Jeffrey C Gossett/HOU/ECT on 02/02/2001
05:30 PM ---------------------------
Larry May@ENRON
02/02/2001 02:43 PM
To: Sally Beck/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey C Gossett/HOU/ECT@ECT, Susan M
Scott/HOU/ECT@ECT, Errol McLaughlin/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Phillip K Allen/HOU/ECT@ECT, John Arnold/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: re: book admin for Pipe/Gas daily option book
As you might be aware, Susan Scott (the book admin for the pipe option book)
was forced by system problems to stay all night Wednesday night and until 200
am Friday in order to calc my book. While she is scheduled to rotate to the
West desk soon, I think we need to discuss putting two persons on my book in
order to bring the work load to a sustainable level. I'd like to meet at
2:30 pm on Monday to discuss this issue. Please let me know if this time
fits in your schedules.
Thanks,
Larry | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
btw....how's the rash? | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Hello, everyone!
?
There have been a number of changes to the RTO West meeting calendar.? An
updated calendar has been posted on the RTO West Stage 2 main page, which
you can view by clicking on the link below.
?
http://208.55.67.64/Stage2Index.htm
?
Thank you very much, and have a great weekend!
?
- Sarah | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Okay... to ensure we are all on the same page. I've talked to Jill
Linkenauger and Heidi Griffith... and the following will be done.
Jill has forwarded to Heidi the CNR file for CES customers and their
addresses. Jill also forwarded the appropriate form that needs to be sent to
the producers, signed, and return to Enron.
Terry Franklin will be the Enron North America contact on the form for these
CNR producers (Jill estimates about 50 CES producers).
Later this week, Heidi will send the form to the CNR's CES customers. Heidi
will put Terry's phone number and address on the form.
We will need the Appalachian Traders (John Singer, Jim Javins, Jill
Linkenauger) to encourage the producers to sign this paper work and get it
back to Enron ASAP. We want the change over done by April estimates.
Jill said if the change did not happen in time for April estimates, she would
help send out the ascii file one more time. At the end of March, Jill will
end her employment with CES... so we can't depend on her in the future months
for this ascii file.
Thanks again for everyone's help in getting the change over done ASAP. | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
My YTD nymx and your YTD nymx don't tie. Here is my worksheet. Would take a
look at it and let me know which deals are wrong. You are a wonderful person
by the way. | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Attached is the cover letter. This version incorporates the changes we
discussed over the phone on Friday, Stojic & Kelly's suggestions, and further
revisions by Shelley. (I've attached redlined and nonredlined versions.)
Shelley and I might have a further revision or two with respect to footnote
9.
On Monday I'll be in meetings 9:30 - 10:30 and 2:00 - 4:00; otherwise I'll be
at my desk. Please fax me the final version of the tariff sheets when you
have them (to 713-646-4095). And, please call if there are any remaining
questions.
Many thanks,
Susan | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Effective March 1, 2001 Enron North America (CO 0413) employees will begin
using XMS (Expense Management System) to process employee expense
reimbursements.
XMS is a web based employee expense reimbursement system which will provide
the following benefits;
? More timely reimbursements to employees
? User friendly Web access
? Ability for employee or designated administrative assistant to submit
expense reimbursement
? Greater efficiency and lower cost
? Efficiently integrated with the current SAP accounting system
This system will REPLACE our current manual expense reimbursement process.
All employee expense reimbursements for ENA employees submitted after March
1, 2001 should be done via XMS.
Following are details regarding system access, training and support.
To access the system go to the Enron Home Page and type http://xms.enron.com
in the address field.
LOGON ID
Enter your personnel number (P number). HR information is loaded
automatically into XMS, but an incomplete load may mean that some people's
IDs are not updated. If your P number doesn't work, try using your first
initial and last name (lower case). If you can't log in to the system, go to
the IT Central web page from the Enron home page and select Services>Security
Requests>eRequest or call (713) 853-5536.
PASSWORD
The first time you log in, the password is upper case ENRON. The system will
guide you through confirming your personal information and changing your
password. The Enron Code of Ethics prohibits the sharing of passwords and
logging on as another person. Please observe Enron,s policy. If you have
forgotten your password, call the Resolution Center at (713) 853-1411.
TRAINING
Go to the IT Central web page. Select Services>Training. Click on
"Schedules" in the North America column, and go to the XMS Workshop schedule
to choose your class. If no classes are listed, call the training department
and place your request at (713) 853-1816. Those in outlying locations and
those who prefer on-line training can use LEAP by signing on to isc.enron.com
and clicking on "training and education," then LEAP (shown as a link). Use
xms (lower case) as the User ID and Password.
DOCUMENTATION
Step by Step documentation is also available from IT Central web page.
Select Services>Training. Click on "Documentation" in the North America
column and choose XMS User's Guide from the list.
APPLICATION SUPPORT SERVICES
Call the ISC help desk at (713) 345-4SAP (4727). Do not call Accounts Payable
with questions about how to use the system or with issues regarding
electronic pre-populated data. | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Yes, and I assume that Sean still has the Annexes previously prepared. SS
David P Dupre
11/08/99 07:17 AM
To: Larry Joe Hunter/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Cata
May I forward this to Sean Black? | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Sorry for the confusion. I was sending out several emails today. I will send out the golf balls when I receive your money order. The address for you to send it to is: Phillip Love, P.O. Box 890086, Houston, TX 77289. Thanks and sorry for the confusion.
PL
-----Original Message-----
From: Love, Phillip M.
Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2002 9:20 AM
To: '[email protected]'
Subject: Enron Values cube
Congratulations on winning the auction on EBay for the Enron Values cube. Please let me know if you will be paying by PayPal([email protected]) or by money order/cashier's check. As soon as I receive payment, I will mail the cube by priority mail. Please send me your mailing address. If you respond during the day, respond to this email address, the [email protected] is for my home account and I can not access it from work. Thanks again.
PL | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Note: This article gives some of the strategy and economics of the purchase
of Montana Power by Pan Canadian.
We will look at the Oklahoma reserves for location and strategy with our
pipe--with the switch in ownership, they may be
receptive to strategy changes.
Lorna
PanCanadian Says Montana Power Purchase 'Beautiful Fit'
To extend what it sees as dominance in Canada's natural gas market and to
boost its production by 10%, PanCanadian Petroleum Ltd. yesterday agreed to
purchase Montana Power Co. for $475 million. The properties will extend
PanCanadian's existing shallow gas properties in southern Alberta into
northern Montana, adding 94 MMcf/d and 3,800 barrels of crude oil and natural
gas liquids.
The acquisition will give PanCanadian properties in Alberta, Montana,
Colorado, Oklahoma and Wyoming, along with three gas pipelines linking
Alberta and Saskatchewan to Montana.
"We have a focus on natural gas," said CEO David Tuer during a conference
call yesterday in Calgary. "This is clearly our future. It is difficult to
put any negative on this (acquisition) and it's likely to stay valuable for
the foreseeable future."
Montana Power's production is more than 90% natural gas and associated
liquids, and the acquisition substantially extends PanCanadian's land and
infrastructure, allowing it to use its technology and operating strategies in
a region that extends along the Alberta-Montana border.
"The Montana Power assets clearly fit our strengths and allow us to employ
our expertise in developing long life reserves of shallow and medium depth
natural gas," Tuer said. "The potential in these assets is significant, and
over the next few years, we will add substantially to PanCanadian's daily
natural gas production."
Tuer said that the acquisition extends the company's dominance in shallow
gas, and called Montana Power a "beautiful fit with PanCanadian's gas
strategy, land position and technological capability."
PanCanadian's newest acquisition adds reserves of 550 Bcf and 20 MM barrels
of oil and natural gas liquids on a proven and one-half probable basis, said
officials. Production and reserves account for $520 million of the purchase
price, while the remainder is made up of $135 million for the midstream and
marketing assets, $40 million for the undeveloped land (about 600,000 acres),
and $7 million of working capital.
Tuer said the company was paying 77 cents/Mcfe of proven and on-half probable
reserves. The price for daily flowing production, based on a 6:1 ration of
gas to BOE is $4,450/Mcfe, or $26,710/BOE.
Along with the added Alberta and Montana properties, PanCanadian also picks
up some land in Colorado's Denver Basin, which now produces about 31 MMcf/d.
Other land that is part of the sale is located in the Anadarko Basin of
Oklahoma and the Green River Basin of Wyoming.
Three natural gas pipelines that cross from Montana into Alberta and
Saskatchewan also are included. The pipelines allow direct access to the U.S.
markets for southern Alberta and Saskatchewan gas, and serve more than 1.2
million net acres of developed and undeveloped lands, with most of it
concentrated in parcels that span the Canada-Montana border.
Midstream assets that go to PanCanadian include a natural gas marketing
company in Butte, MT, along with a deep cut gas processing and fractionation
plant in Colorado. The Fort Lupton, CO plant processes more than 60 MMcf/d
and 5,500 barrels of natural gas liquids and condensate.
In all, the total developed and undeveloped land is roughly 1.2 million net
acres, or 1.7 million gross acres, said PanCanadian.
"Montana Power fit us like a glove," Tuer said during the conference call. He
said the acquisition will help PanCanadian to remain "best of class" for what
it does. "It makes our sandbox that much bigger."
The acquisition, which is expected to close around Oct. 31, will increase
both PanCanadian's net income and cash flow this year and in subsequent
years, said Tuer. The added gas production will immediately increase the
company's natural gas, as a percentage of total production, to 58%, based on
a 6:1 ratio of gas to BOE.
About 25% of the natural gas being acquired from Montana Power now is being
sold to Montana Power utilities for $1.50 to $1.60 MMcf until July 2002, and
because it's priced below the open market officials think future earnings
will be good.
"As that contract expires, there's a lot of potential from the price in this
transaction," Tuer said.
And what's to become of Montana Power? Earlier this year, the 88-year-old
company, headquartered in Butte, announced it would divest itself of four of
its traditional energy businesses. By selling its coal production, natural
gas transmission and distribution, independent power production and oil and
gas exploration and production businesses, it plans to reinvest the proceeds
in Touch America, a fiber optics and telecommunications business, which is
also a subsidiary of Montana Power.
"The process to determine the buyer for our oil and gas business was robust,
and we are delighted with the result," said Montana Power CEO Robert P.
Gannon. "We believe there will be a meshing of business strategies and that
cultural synergy's exist between the purchased companies and Pan Canadian."
He noted that Montana Power has had a Canadian presence for almost 50 years.
PanCanadian purchased the entire oil and gas division, which now employs
about 170. PanCanadian plans to maintain a regional office in Butte, invest
in the acquired properties and grow daily gas production. There was no word
on whether any jobs would be lost.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-- | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Mike:
Thanks again for taking the time to meet with me last week. I left you Rich
Kinder's number on Thursday with your assistant, Sheilla - hope you got it.
Again, I think a deal between or three companies is something to really look
at. I think it creates a great story to the street. Kinder/Morgan brings
the growth story, the gas pipelines for the convergence play and the
development team, Enron brings the MW's and trading and Cinergy brings MW's,
trading and operating expertise. I feel that Enron and Cinergy can work
togther with regards to the trading. I am sending you an anayst report I
just finish reading regarding generation spinoffs - I think it will be
helpful. Also, Kay Chapman, Dave's assistant informed me that you were
coming up next week, and I wanted to know if you wanted me to be there or not
or if you wanted me to prepare anything for you for the meeting.
Hope you had a good weekend and I look forward to talking to you soon.
Regards,
Ben
(713) 853-7998 | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
----- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/NA/Enron on 01/08/2001 02:30 PM -----
Jeff Dasovich
Sent by: Jeff Dasovich
01/03/2001 08:08 PM
To: Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron
cc: Alan Comnes/PDX/ECT@ECT, Angela Schwarz/HOU/EES@EES, Beverly
Aden/HOU/EES@EES, Bill Votaw/HOU/EES@EES, Brenda Barreda/HOU/EES@EES, Carol
Moffett/HOU/EES@EES, Cathy Corbin/HOU/EES@EES, Chris H Foster/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Christina Liscano/HOU/EES@EES, Christopher F Calger/PDX/ECT@ECT, Craig H
Sutter/HOU/EES@EES, Dan Leff/HOU/EES@EES, Debora Whitehead/HOU/EES@EES,
Dennis Benevides/HOU/EES@EES, Don Black/HOU/EES@EES, Donna
Fulton/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Dorothy Youngblood/HOU/ECT@ECT, Douglas
Huth/HOU/EES@EES, Edward Sacks/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Eric Melvin/HOU/EES@EES,
Erika Dupre/HOU/EES@EES, Evan Hughes/HOU/EES@EES, Fran Deltoro/HOU/EES@EES,
Frank W Vickers/HOU/ECT@ECT, Gayle W Muench/HOU/EES@EES, Ginger
Dernehl/NA/Enron@ENRON, Gordon Savage/HOU/EES@EES, Harold G
Buchanan/HOU/EES@EES, Harry Kingerski/NA/Enron@ENRON, Iris Waser/HOU/EES@EES,
James D Steffes/NA/Enron@ENRON, James W Lewis/HOU/EES@EES, James
Wright/Western Region/The Bentley Company@Exchange, Jeff Messina/HOU/EES@EES,
Jeremy Blachman/HOU/EES@EES, Jess Hewitt/HOU/EES@EES, Joe
Hartsoe/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Karen Denne/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Kathy
Bass/HOU/EES@EES, Kathy Dodgen/HOU/EES@EES, Ken Gustafson/HOU/EES@EES, Kevin
Hughes/HOU/EES@EES, Leasa Lopez/HOU/EES@EES, Leticia Botello/HOU/EES@EES,
Mark S Muller/HOU/EES@EES, Marsha Suggs/HOU/EES@EES, Marty Sunde/HOU/EES@EES,
Meredith M Eggleston/HOU/EES@EES, Michael Etringer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michael
Mann/HOU/EES@EES, Michelle D Cisneros/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mike D Smith/HOU/EES@EES,
Mike M Smith/HOU/EES@EES, [email protected], Neil Bresnan/HOU/EES@EES, Neil
Hong/HOU/EES@EES, Paul Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT, Paula Warren/HOU/EES@EES, Richard
L Zdunkewicz/HOU/EES@EES, Richard Leibert/HOU/EES@EES, Richard
Shapiro/NA/Enron@ENRON, Rita Hennessy/NA/Enron@ENRON, Robert
Badeer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Roger Yang/SFO/EES@EES, Rosalinda Tijerina/HOU/EES@EES,
Sandra McCubbin/NA/Enron@ENRON, Sarah Novosel/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Scott
Gahn/HOU/EES@EES, Scott Stoness/HOU/EES@EES, Sharon Dick/HOU/EES@EES,
[email protected], Susan J Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON, Tanya Leslie/HOU/EES@EES, Tasha
Lair/HOU/EES@EES, Ted Murphy/HOU/ECT@ECT, Terri Greenlee/NA/Enron@ENRON, Tim
Belden/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tony Spruiell/HOU/EES@EES, Vicki Sharp/HOU/EES@EES,
Vladimir Gorny/HOU/ECT@ECT, Wanda Curry/HOU/EES@EES, William S
Bradford/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Materials Provided to California Governor
Attached are the final versions of confidential materials provided to the
Governor's office.
Best,
Jeff | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
We may be dining with my brother and Sister in law tomorrow around 6:30 PM.
Comments ???? Questions????? | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
thanks for the info.
Yan Wang@ENRON
07/17/2000 01:34 PM
To: Bhavna Pandya/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Scott.Neal@ECT, [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected]
Subject: Re: New Notice from Texas Eastern Transmission Corporation
This one is an exception. I sent out a mail about this site before, about a
month ago,
let me explain the situation again.
It is weird that this web site uses such a long line as the URL link for
their critical notices,
but Lotus notes can only take the first line starting with http:// as the hot
link, this is why you see
only the first line was underlined as the link. When you click the partial
URL link, of course you'll
get an error. To work around this you need to copy the whole five lines, open
your IE and paste
it to the address box and press "Enter". Let me know if there is still a
question. Thanks.
Yan Wang
Bhavna Pandya@ECT
07/17/2000 01:01 PM
To: [email protected]
cc:
Subject: New Notice from Texas Eastern Transmission Corporation
Yan,
The link does not work on this one. Please fix. Thank you.
---------------------- Forwarded by Bhavna Pandya/HOU/ECT on 07/17/2000 01:00
PM ---------------------------
[email protected] on 07/17/2000 09:10:06 AM
To: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected],
Scott.Neal@ECT, [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected]
cc:
Subject: New Notice from Texas Eastern Transmission Corporation
Texas Eastern Transmission Corporation posted new notice(s) since our last
check at 7/14/00 9:00:00 AM, the newest notice looks like:
Storage, 07/14/2000 01:08p, 07/14/2000 01:08p, 10/12/2000 12:00a, Aggregate
Customer Inj Performance
Please click the following to go to the web site for detail.
http://infopost.link.duke-energy.com/scripts/ndisapi.dll/te/pg_Nav_Control_4.N
onCritical_onWebEvent(NonCritical)?NonCritical=&SPIDERSESSION=%3f%3f%3f%3f%3f%
5f%3f%3f%3f%40%5b%3f%3f%3f%3fBOs%5cH%3f%3f%3f%3f%3f%3f%3f%3f%3fM%40JrbZ%40J%60
F%7dzO%3f%3f%3fIxQb%40MWVuiWCEh%5eOlCYJe%5c%3fBH%5fOsPCdJsKKqqEWSehiC%3fuWX%7e
HiF%60tsMywfeExNBuGk%7bQMu%5bThCHeyiXNcrFqxuMjX%7e%7bRW%5dAuOlqEZJJO%7cCTO%7eu
CH%60%5eY%5fcOMnDcaR%5bsY%60%40%5eeCNxM%5f%5bEW%60ftCNT%5eBpxpC%5etWzFCNW%5f%4
0%5eeFv%5dN%60%5fFRrjvWH%5f%40%5cBTTA%7et%7ez%60otLVCP%7erzsYrS%5d%5eqvuX%7ewo
M%40%7c%5eKnWQeD%7ciPFSjyuiWCT%7b&%5euniqueValue=963344479953 | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
? www.erisk.com
What's New at ERisk.com - 06 April 2001
Weekly Review This week's economic, banking and P_insurance news, from an
enterprise risk management perspective. Read it here ...
Analysis
? How the New Economy aided and abetted the economic downturn
? State or federal regulation? Banks and insurers slug it out
? Credit risk concentration hits the interest-rate swaps market
Feature Why do some ART products fare better than others? Credit insurance,
for example, has taken off while the securitisation of catastrophe risk has
struggled. In this feature, Sanford Bernstein analysts Todd Bault and
Timothy Connor suggest that the secret of success lies in matching different
kinds of risk to their appropriate owners - and that insurers' expertise in
handling basis risk makes this a potentially lucrative market. Also still
available: Penny Cagan on Basle's treatment of operational risk.
iConference
Looking for an overview of economic capital? Attend our iConference
"Practical Considerations in Measuring Economic Capital" on April 11. Read
more about it and register for the iConference.
Still available: Slides and a summary of the Credit Derivatives iConference.
Links Need to find educational material on the Web? Looking for a software
vendor, a regulator or an exchange? Find hundreds of links to other risk
management sites and resources in our Links section
The ERisk Essentials is published every Friday by ERisk.com.
To subscribe to this newsletter, please register on our website.
To unsubscribe, access your account. Your username is the email address
where you received this message.
To be reminded of your password, or to reset it, follow this link. | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
I am tied up this morning. SS
Kathryn Thomas
11/28/2000 03:14 AM
To: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: New US Entities
Sara - hope this is OK with you. The meeting will start at 10am Houston
time and I was wondering if there is any chance that you can conference call
in to Denis O'Connels office (+44 (0)20 7783 4828)?
Please confirm as soon as possible.
Many thanks
Kath
---------------------- Forwarded by Kathryn Thomas/LON/ECT on 28/11/2000
09:12 ---------------------------
Alarm enabled: an alarm will occur 12 minutes before the start time of this
entry.
Calendar Entry
New US Entities (Denis's office)
Brief description:
Date:
Time:
28/11/2000
16:00 - 17:00
Detailed description:
Discuss implications of implementing entities of the attached.
Invitations
Phone/Ext Include
Chairperson: Richard Sage/LON/ECT 37546 Yes
Organised by: Kathryn Thomas/LON/ECT No
Invitations sent to: David A Wall
Denis O'Connell
Rod Nelson
Ian Sloman
Kellie Naven
Sara Shackleton
Ann Hicks
Optional invitees: Erica Gut
Other invitees:
Room Booking | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
We are trying to locate the following file:
Fed 934 1999 Return File (Southwest Power, LLC)
If you have this file or know where it is, please contact me @ x3-1765.
Thank you so much for your help.
Selma | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Thanks Bill--see my other email. We'll let them suggest a name. df
From: William E Brown/ENRON@enronXgate on 03/22/2001 04:05 PM
To: Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc: Ann Ballard/ENRON@enronXgate
Subject: Organizational Partner Inc.
Drew - Below is a list of D&O of the subject entity. This is also your
reminder to contact Ann Ballard at (713) 853-5285, as to whether David
Neubauer or Kent Miller are appropriate to fill your soon-to-be vacated
position with this company. Here's the list:
DIRECTORS: Title:
Richard A. Causey Director
James V. Derrick, Jr. Director
Drew J. Fossum* Director
John D. McCallum Director
OFFICERS: Title:
Drew J. Fossum* President
William R. Cordes* Vice President
R. Davis Maxey Vice President
Mary Kay Miller* Vice President
Kleoniki Maria A. Pavlou* Secretary | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Grasshopper,
Geat to hear from you. I am doing good. Learning alot on the trade desk.
Here is petes email address
[email protected]
laters
-----Original Message-----
From: "Purvi Patel" <[email protected]>@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22Purvi+20Patel+22+20+3Cpnpatel+40tecoenergy+2Ecom+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent: Thursday, August 09, 2001 1:54 PM
To: Quigley, Dutch
Subject: Question
Hi Dutch,
How are you ? U miss me at all? I wanted to know what pete's e-mail address was. I keep e-mailing him and it keeps coming back to me. thanks.
Purvi | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Additions from Jubran...
Proposed pricing mechanism:
Dow Jones Electricity Indexes, specifically their NP15/SP15 indexes.
- the indexes are based on weighted average prices and total volumes
- they measure "bilateral one-day prescheduled, financially firm transactions"
=> therefore the Dow Jones Index more accurately reflects market pricing
- Dow Jones has the right to randomly audit the data providers
why not the ex-post ISO?
- generators are not selling to California's ISO because of the $150/MWh
price cap,
=> therefore prices coming out of the ISO do not reflect real market prices
- there are purchases above the $150 soft cap, but the pricing of the out of
market transactions is explained to FERC only, this information is not in the
public domain
- if generators are not selling into the market, there is no liquidity,
therefore prices are not reflective of the prices that buyers must pay
- and generators may not be selling into the market due to the credit exposure
why not use the ex-post ISO price on an interim basis?
- because putting a false cap on the market price will result in price
increases to DA customers, contrary to AB1890, without due process
- Decision 99-06-058 set the foundation for the PX credit to reflect real
market prices, PG&E's proposal does not adhere to this. | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
---------------------- Forwarded by Darron C Giron/HOU/ECT on 10/27/2000
03:39 PM ---------------------------
From: William Kelly 10/27/2000 02:51 PM
To: Jeffrey C Gossett/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kam Keiser/HOU/ECT@ECT, Darron C
Giron/HOU/ECT@ECT, David Baumbach/HOU/ECT@ECT, David Oliver/HOU/ECT,
[email protected]
cc:
Subject: FW: It's a tough game
This is what Goss did to Etter for quiting....
---------------------- Forwarded by William Kelly/HOU/ECT on 10/27/2000 02:44
PM ---------------------------
[email protected] on 10/27/2000 02:31:44 PM
Please respond to <[email protected]>
To: "UCX FFL \(E-mail\)" <[email protected]>
cc:
Subject: FW: It's a tough game
Not for the squeamish...
-----Original Message-----
From: Kappes, Jerry [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Friday, October 27, 2000 2:13 PM
To: Rock (E-mail); Thumble (E-mail); Britt (E-mail)
Subject: FW: It's a tough game
-----Original Message-----
From: Gallagher, Michael
Sent: Friday, October 27, 2000 12:26 PM
To: Reynolds, Kerri; Wheeler, Larry; Kappes, Jerry; Setzekorn, Russ
Subject: FW: It's a tough game
- att2.jpg | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
John:
The changes I suggested on the watercraft wording are still being reviewed
for completeness. I think what I gave you will work for most situations where
the watercraft is incidental to the work or is far removed from our being
involved [contractor to sub to sub contractor] but it does not address every
situation that we could be involved in. We may need to expand our wording
accordingly.
Likewise, your question on giving to the turbine venders the waiver of
subrogation and additional insured is an even bigger concern. You are asking
us to obligate ourselves in providing waiver and additional insured status to
GE which we cannot do. As you know, we went many years with providing
turbine venders protection under the insurance because the market was soft
and underwriters agreed to it. Now they balk at giving it because of the
losses they have incurred and we cannot predict what they will agree to. It
does not matter if the machines are proto-type or not, there is a good chance
right now that they will not agree to insuring the vender. Everyone says it
only takes money and in many cases we could probably include venders on the
insurance but I cannot recommend committing to it in a long term contract )
we have to arrange the insurance at the time we need it in order to determine
if it is available.
If you need to have some language in the agreement, I would recommend that we
not give the waive and additional insured to GE or any vender. When we need
the insurance and begin placing it, we can then determine if the underwriter
will cover the vender and ask for a price reduction from GE to move their
risk to the underwriter.
I am sorry I cannot make this easier but that is the nature of the insurance
beast.
Paul | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
I would mention Carlos in the email, or have it shown as sent by him. If it
were me (and not him), I would have you send it under your own name, but
explain that you are helping Carlos.
From: Kathleen Carnahan/ENRON@enronXgate on 05/31/2001 09:31 AM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: Indian matter
I am getting ready to send Michelle Blaine a question regarding some proposed
gifts that Mat Gimble and crew want to give the "new" Seminole Indian Chief.
Would you rather the question be sent by you? If so, let me know and I will
explain, otherwise I will just copy you on the e-mail.
K-
Kathleen Carnahan
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3146d
Houston, TX 77002
Phone - (713) 345-3386
Fax - (713) 646-3037 | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
The attached file includes contracts form April 1 through September 30. Sorry for the confusion.
Dennis P. Lee
ETS
Gas Logistics
(713) 853-1715
[email protected] | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
The next meeting of the California Energy Solutions Group (formerly the AB
1890 Implementation Group) will be:
Friday, December 1, 2000
9:00 to 12:30
California Chamber of Commerce
1215 K Street, 14th Floor
We will be sending out an agenda forthwith. Please contact me if you have
any questions or would like to add an item to the agenda.
Thanks to all of you who attended this year's retreat. It was a great
success because of your participation.
Thanks again,
Delaney | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Chris Long (Enron) and I spent yesterday on Capitol Hill. We met with House
Agriculture Committee Minority and Majority Staff, Senate Banking Committee
Staff and Senate Agriculture Committee Staff. The bill clearly is moving and
there is a good chance it will go to the Floor of the House next week. The
bilateral exemption for physical commodities (non-agricultural commodities)
is accepted and should be secure. We have problems with the electronic
trading facility exemption for physical commodities.
House
The House Agriculture Committee remains inclined to exclude metals from the
exemption. We are working with the Commerce Committee (which has not
excluded metals) to change that result.
Senate
We have a much more severe problem in the Senate. Senate democrats led by
Senator Harkin are very concerned to go against the CFTC in favor of big
energy companies. They want the CFTC to endorse the exemption.
Unfortunately, as you are aware, the CFTC (recently the Chairman himself)
have been heavily lobbying against the exemption. We are working with staff
and will keep you posted.
We have prepared talking points and bullets which are still in draft to
distribute to the Hill. I would appreciate your comments on them and your
thoughts.
----------------------------------
This e-mail is sent by a law firm and contains information
that may be privileged and confidential. If you are not the
intended recipient, please delete the e-mail and notify us
immediately.
- Bullets.doc
- H.R. 4541 Energy Group Talking Points.doc | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
That's great Dan, the extension is actually only 6 months (Aug 01 - Jan 02).
Also, can we make it an "ammendment" to the existing deal?
Dan J Hyvl
01/19/2001 01:00 PM
To: Dave Fuller/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc: Anne Bike/Corp/Enron@Enron, Tori Kuykendall/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: Mesa Restructure
DAve,
Once you decide which way you would like to go, We will issue a new
Confirmation Letter which will cancel the two previous confirmation letters
effective as of February 1, 2001. Because the term extends some 17 months,
we will require them to sign the confirmation letter with attached GTC. Let
me know, and I will generate.
Dave Fuller
01/19/2001 01:25 PM
To: Tori Kuykendall/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dan J Hyvl/HOU/ECT@ECT, Anne
Bike/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: Mesa Restructure
I have a proposed restructuring transaction with City of Mesa, Arizona. It
works like this:
1) Half their volume is currently priced at 3.74 (fixed, physical deal with
us)
2) That deal runs through July 01
3) I want to reprice that deal at a higher price and use that equity to
finance a discount to index for an extra six months.
4) They will do one of two transactions (shown below) one extends half the
volume one extends the full volume.
I need help with a couple of things:
1) Since they canceled their Enfolio Agmt. can I get a contract from legal
that will allow us to transact without it.
2) How do we get this deal in Mike's book and the risk system
Thanks,
Dave Fuller
503-464-3732 | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
FYI in case you should need it!
---------------------- Forwarded by Joseph Alamo/NA/Enron on 05/16/2001 03:33
PM ---------------------------
Maureen McVicker
05/16/2001 03:33 PM
To: Joseph Alamo/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: NEW DIAL IN # FOR FRI CONF CALL
Joseph - I meant to copy you on this email. Just in case JD needs the
correct #. (the new call will be for the sellers only)
Thanks.. T T F N
---------------------- Forwarded by Maureen McVicker/NA/Enron on 05/16/2001
05:32 PM ---------------------------
Steven J Kean
05/16/2001 05:30 PM
Sent by: Maureen McVicker
To: [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
cc:
Subject: NEW DIAL IN # FOR FRI CONF CALL
The Governor's advisors will not be prepared to discuss the credit issues on
Friday. A new dial in number has been set up for a conference call amongst
the sellers.
The time and participant codes remain the same - only the dial in # has
changed.
DATE: Friday, May 18th
TIME: 10:00 am (Central) - should last approx 1 hour
CALL IN #: 1-877-322-9648 (this is the new dial in #)
HOST CODE: 564778 (Steve Kean's use only)
PARTICIPANT
CODE: 285987
Attached is the most recent/revised sellers contact list. | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
CONFIDENTIAL/ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE
Stan:
I have given considerable thought to the issue you raised in the
meeting on June 15 -- that is, whether the amount of Available Cash for the
fourth quarter of 1999 could be recomputed so that the issuance of APIs for
that quarter could be rescinded. My delay in getting back to you was
occasioned by the fact that I went on vacation shortly after that meeting
and just returned to work yesterday.
The reason the question is worth exploring is this --- Enron Corp.
has certain rights under its support agreement with EOTT, and it is entitled
to exercise those rights notwithstanding the fact that it also has a
fiduciary duty as a controlling shareholder. I approached the question
solely as counsel for Enron and from the standpoint of evaluating the merits
of any claim that Enron could make that the API issuance should be
rescinded. From that standpoint it is no different from asking: if EOTT
were dealing with an unrelated third party would that third party have a
claim for rescission? Unfortunately, based on the facts as I understand
them, I have been unable to formulate a claim that has sufficient merit to
be worthy of assertion, as explained below.
The computation of Available Cash for any quarter is based on (a)
cash receipts and disbursements and (b) increases or reductions in cash
reserves, which the General Partner "determines in its reasonable discretion
to be necessary or appropriate." Thus, the question is whether there is a
basis for recomputing the cash receipts or the reserves for the fourth
quarter.
Cash Receipts. I would think there may well be a valid claim in a
situation in which EOTT made a mistake in its calculations of cash receipts
or disbursements, even if that mistake was discovered several months later.
It is my understanding, however, that the scrub-down of the books for the
fourth quarter turned up only immaterial discrepancies from the amounts that
had been calculated for the fourth quarter in mid-February, when the
distribution of Available Cash for the quarter was made. Thus, I am aware
of no meritorious argument that Enron is entitled to rescission because of
EOTT's mistakes in calculating its cash receipts or disbursements for the
quarter. That being the case, the only other issue that is worth focusing
on is the reserves.
Reserves. The only component of the reserves that I am aware of
that is large enough to bear scrutiny is the theft-related insurance item.
There were no cash receipts from the insurance prior to the distribution, so
any claim for rescission must focus on the amount of reserves for the fourth
quarter. If the level of reserves was determined in a manner that was not
consistent with the "reasonable discretion" standard set forth in the
partnership agreement, Enron would have a valid claim for rescission.
Presumably had the General Partner known in mid-February that insurance
would cover the $3 million loss (other than the $500,000 deductible), it
would have reduced reserves by $2.5 million (either by setting aside less in
reserves or releasing reserves established in prior quarters), which would
have produced $2.5 million of additional Available Cash. In that case there
would not have been any APIs required. Is there a basis for a claim that
the General Partner did not use "reasonable discretion" when it established
the level of reserves? Based on the facts as I understand them, I have been
unable to come up with a good argument that the General Partner was not
using its "reasonable discretion" in making the determination it made. It
is my understanding that, although at the time the General Partner was aware
that it had theft insurance, it did not know whether the insurance would
cover the entire $3 million loss or merely the $800,000 in fair market value
of the product at the time of the theft (less the $500,000 deductible). I
also understand that the insurance carrier had not admitted liability at
that time, so there was some question whether there would be any insurance
proceeds. Thus, it seems it would be very difficult to establish that the
General Partner did not use its reasonable discretion.
The partnership agreement makes it clear that the amount of
Available Cash is to be computed based on (a) actual receipts and
disbursements during the quarter and (b) distributions from the operating
partnerships and reserves established, or changes in reserves, that in each
case occur prior to the "date on which the Partnership makes its
distribution of Available Cash in respect of such quarter." Thus, the
partnership agreement leaves no room for going back and redoing reserves
based on events that occur after the distribution for the quarter.
Please call if you have any questions about this analysis or if you
think I do not have my facts straight or need additional facts. You can
reach me at 713/758-2414.
Robert S. Baird
Vinson & Elkins L.L.P.
One American Center
600 Congress Avenue
Austin, Texas 78701-3200
Office phone: 512/495-8451
Fax: 512/236-3210
Home phone: 512/347-8065
Car phone: 512/627-8065
Pager: 1-888-487-2651
Voice mail: 512/495-8696, x8451
Internet: [email protected] | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
---------------------- Forwarded by Peter F Keavey/HOU/ECT on 03/16/2000
03:54 PM ---------------------------
From: Kal Shah 03/16/2000 03:24 PM
To: Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Peter F Keavey/HOU/ECT@ECT, Zal
Masani/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bill White/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc: Brenda Flores-Cuellar/HOU/ECT@ECT, Louise Kitchen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark
Palmer, Rahil Jafry, Michelle Vitrella
Subject: Focus Group with traders -- EnronOnline Commercial
As an update to my e-mail below, the EnronOnline focus group with traders
will be held in EB3125B from Noon to 1 p.m. next Tuesday, March 21st. I
would greatly appreciate it if you can attend.
Kal Shah
x 39354
---------------------- Forwarded by Kal Shah/HOU/ECT on 03/16/2000 03:13 PM
---------------------------
From: Kal Shah 03/15/2000 03:52 PM
To: Peter F Keavey/HOU/ECT@ECT, Zal Masani/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bill
White/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc: Louise Kitchen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Palmer, Rahil Jafry
Subject: Focus Group with traders -- EnronOnline Commercial
As per our conversation today, I am helping Enron's ad agency develop a
television commercial about EnronOnline. Their creative team would like to
meet with a few Enron traders to learn first hand about what traders like,
dislike, what motivates them, their work environment, etc. This will help us
make the commercial more realistic. Would you or a couple of traders in your
team be able to attend a focus group next Tuesday, March 21st from 11:45 to 1
p.m. in the Enron Building? I'll send you the meeting room info. later. We
will serve lunch. Please let me know. Your input will be very useful in
creating an effective ad.
Kal Shah
ext. 39354 | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
So it could be one way or the other...
MDay <[email protected]>
04/10/2001 04:05 PM
To: "'Williams, Robert C.'" <[email protected]>, "'Harry
Kingerski'" <[email protected]>, "'Jim Steffes, Enron'" <[email protected]>,
"'Jeff Dasovich Enron SF'" <[email protected]>, "'Leslie Lawner, Enron'"
<[email protected]>, "'Richard.Sanders, Enron'" <[email protected]>
cc:
Subject: RE: SCE PX credits
As I told Bob in an earlier email, I noticed this same provision. However,
it could be implemented in one of two ways. Either finding that SCE is not
liable for negative CTC credits after that date, or holding that it is
liable and providing for cost recovery. Either is consistent with the
language in the MOU. We will need to explore this more, and possibly talk
to SCE. Mike Day
-----Original Message-----
From: Williams, Robert C. [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Tuesday, April 10, 2001 1:45 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: FW: SCE PX credits
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Kingerski, Harry
> Sent: Tuesday, April 10, 2001 3:44 PM
> To: Williams, Robert C.; Smith, Mike; Sharp, Vicki;
> [email protected]
> Cc: Dasovich, Jeff; Steffes, James; Stoness, Scott
> Subject: SCE PX credits
>
> Interesting bit from SCE's MOU (p. 31) -
>
> "the CPUC Implementing Decisions shall include
>
> Orders resolving the responsibility of SCE to provide credits to
> direct access customers in respect of electricity deliveries after
> December 31, 2000 in respects which do not result in any material
> financial detriment to SCE; "
>
> Translation: I suppose this means SCE is looking for an order
> absolving it of any responsibility for PX credits after 12/31/00, but
> implicitly, that seems to suggest they accept responsibility for PX
> credits before 12/31/00. Do you agree? | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
what's up froggy. we've finally slowed down over here. give me a call today
if you get a chance. 713.853.0383 | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
don't change the subject. vote your concious. gore voted for scalia AND
thomas.
Nancy Sellers <[email protected]>
11/03/2000 05:13 PM
To: "'[email protected]'" <[email protected]>, Nancy Sellers
<[email protected]>
cc: Cameron <[email protected]>, Jeff Dasovich <[email protected]>,
Prentice Sellers <[email protected]>, "Prentice @ Berkeley"
<[email protected]>, Scott Laughlin <[email protected]>
Subject: RE: Get Out the Vote
Did you read Molly Ivins wonderful column last week in which she says exactly
why she is voting for Nader and we should vote for Gore??
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [SMTP:[email protected]]
Sent: Friday, November 03, 2000 3:09 PM
To: Nancy Sellers
Cc: Cameron; Jeff Dasovich; Prentice Sellers; Prentice @ Berkeley; Scott
Laughlin Subject: Re: Get Out the Vote
Of course, I will be hurt and disappointed if the Sellers family doesn't
vote its conscious, doesn't vote for the candidate that truly represents
the values that the Sellers family stands for. That candidate is, of
course, Ralph Nadar.
Amen,
Jeff
P.S. Rory and Timi love Dr. Laura.
Nancy
Sellers
<Nancy.Sellers@RobertMo To: Cameron
<[email protected]>, Jeff
ndavi.com> Dasovich
<[email protected]>, "Prentice @
Berkeley"
<[email protected]>, Prentice
11/03/2000 05:07 PM Sellers
<[email protected]>, Scott Laughlin
<[email protected]>
cc:
Subject: Get Out the
Vote
Subject: Get Out The Vote - Nov 7(superscript: th)
This is a letter to the editor that appeared in the Cleveland Plain Dealer.
This is the letter in its entirety.
For those in need of a reason to vote on November 7, here are two:
1. Because Matthew Shepard cannot.
2. Because Dr. Laura can.
Nancy
(707) 251-4870 (phone)
(707) 265-5446 (fax)
"Plus je bois, mieux je chante" | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
FYI. I'll keep all of you posted as we complete our analysis and respond to
Larcamp's thoughts.
Jim
---------------------- Forwarded by James D Steffes/HOU/EES on 07/30/2000
12:02 AM ---------------------------
Shelley Corman@ENRON
07/27/2000 03:01 PM
To: Stanley Horton/Corp/Enron@Enron, Bill Cordes/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Rockford
Meyer/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Mary Kay Miller/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, [email protected],
Ray Neppl/NPNG/Enron@ENRON, Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Teb
Lokey/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Julia White/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Steven
Harris/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Susan Scott/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc: James D Steffes/HOU/EES@EES, Christi L Nicolay/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Follow-up on Larcamp Visit: Comparing Gas /Electric Positions
When Dan Larcamp recently visited he commented that pipelines need to take a
look at differences between gas and electric positions and practices. In
fact, his main concern about pipeline marketing affiliate practices relate to
the fact that they differ from practices on the electric side.
I am working with Jim Steffes and Christi Nicolay on a comparison of gas and
electric practices in the following areas mentioned by Dan Larcamp. Here is
a quick look at the areas that we are comparing:
Contracting for transportation/transmission capacity. Pipelines currently
have a form of service agreement in their tariffs, but they also enter into
non-conforming agreements and discount agreements with shippers. In
contrast, transmission customers enter a two-page standardized blanket
transmission agreement. Then they reserve specific quantities and points
on-line via OASIS. This is probably the area that we'll have the most
difficult time arguing why we are different than the electric side.
Negotiating discounts. Customers may call or fax pipeline staff to negotiate
discounts, although sometimes a pipeline may post a generally available
discount on the website. On the electric side, discounts are rarely granted,
but if discounts are granted it is handled through OASIS.
Functionality of OASIS vs. pipeline websites. Its true that the OASIS system
facilitates the reservation of transmission space (i.e. contracting) and
discounts, but it doesn't accommodate nominations, invoices, and index of
customers or many of the other features available on pipeline web sites.
Marketing affiliate rules. I plan to lay out a side by side comparison of
Sec. 37 (electric rules) and 161 (gas marketing affiliate rules). One
difference, the posting of organization charts, will be gone after September,
as pipelines will add this information to the web site.
Content of Form 1 vs. Form 2. Dan Larcamp mentioned that he feels like
electric form 1s have more useful market data. I'm not sure we're comparing
apples and apples, as the electrics are still integrated utilities and thus
the form 1 includes sales data. But, we'll put together a comparison
nonetheless.
Hopefully, the detailed comparison can be completed in the next month. Also,
FYI Enron Government Affairs is currently working on their comments to the
latest OASIS rulemaking and plan to use the comparison work to suggest best
pipeline website practices that could be a model for OASIS. I'll keep you
posted. | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Christi, I was unable to open the file can you please send a hard copy.
Regards
Delainey
---------------------- Forwarded by David W Delainey/HOU/ECT on 09/25/2000
10:29 AM ---------------------------
From: Christi L Nicolay 09/25/2000 09:16 AM
To: David W Delainey/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ben Jacoby/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ozzie
Pagan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Janet R Dietrich/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dennis
Benevides/HOU/EES@EES, Raymond Bowen/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: James D Steffes/HOU/EES@EES, Richard Shapiro/HOU/EES@EES, Joe
Hartsoe/Corp/Enron@Enron, Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron
Subject: EPMI protests AEP's continuation of MBRs
On 9/21, EPMI filed a protest (Below) against AEP/CSW's 3 year update request
to continue market based rates for power marketing. The filing includes
examples of discriminatory behavior on OASIS (for ATCs, etc.) that
potentially benefitted AEP's marketing side.
EPMI has already protested Entergy's request for continuation of MBRs earlier
this year, and plans to protest other large utility-based power marketer MBR
filings this fall. Let me know if you would like the list. Thanks.
---------------------- Forwarded by Christi L Nicolay/HOU/ECT on 09/25/2000
08:58 AM ---------------------------
"Susan Buchheit" <[email protected]> on 09/25/2000 09:05:19 AM
To: <[email protected]>
cc:
Subject: AEP filing
** High Priority **
Christi -
Attached is the final filing in word. I also sent you a hard copy on Friday.
- aep.doc | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
I guess I would only request that we get some review put in front of ETS' new
Risk Management Officer and his crew, Jerry Peters. I also understand that
this is a part of the Revenue Management project.
Lisa Sawyer
12/08/2000 12:55 PM
To: Rod Hayslett/FGT/Enron@ENRON
cc: Steve Hotte/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Caroline Barnes/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Lee
Ferrell/ET&S/Enron@Enron
Subject: ETS Risk System
Rod,
Caroline forwarded me your questions regarding the Risk System so I wanted to
go ahead and respond since Steve is out this week.
I don't think Philippe requires the level of due diligence that we performed,
but we were getting questioned on buying a 3rd party product vs. using an
Enron Risk System. We did more research and got the other groups involved so
that they would understand our decision. I believe everyone is now
comfortable with our purchase decision.
In our analysis of systems, we selected the Caminus product in part because
we had several individual references from Arthur Andersen, Deliotte &Touche
and Ernst & Young. These organizations, especially Arthur Andersen, have
audited this application and have actually participated in numerous
implementations. Ernst & Young recently selected Caminus for Equitable
Resources. Arthur Anderson implemented the application for Conoco and 5 or
6 other companies, and Deloitte Touche recently selected the product for
Tractabel. After talking with individuals from these accounting firms, we
felt very confident that the product was sound, and we should not have audit
concerns. Obviously, we have a lot of business procedures that have to be
established, and there is time in the work plan to do that work, but a lot of
those decisions drive how the application is configured so we need to get the
product purchased work through the details of how we implement the new
business procedures since the system does drive a lot of processes.
Regarding costs, we have an approved work order for $650,000 which covers all
the initial hardware, software, implementation costs and first year
maintenance. This cost does represent a very limited implementation with
only 10 concurrent users, no customization except a few reports, and no
electronic interfaces or data conversion. The assumption is that initially
the volume would be so low that an automated interface may not be cost
justified, and the data would manually be loaded since it was low volume as
well. The on-going costs are estimated at approximately $100,000/year. We
did not perform a separate cost/benefit analysis as this was in the original
cost of the Revenue Management RAROC. Let me know if you have any other
questions or there are open issues that we need to address prior to
completing the contract. We are hoping to get this signed and the project
underway next week. Thanks. | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
---------------------- Forwarded by Randall L Gay/HOU/ECT on 09/20/2000 02:22
PM ---------------------------
To: Randall L Gay/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 01/08/2001
02:58 PM ---------------------------
Kathy Spradling <[email protected]> on 01/08/2001 10:47:27 AM
To: (Recipient list suppressed)
cc:
Subject: Spring 2001 Module and Calendar Schedule Attached
Spring 2001 Faculty,
Attached is the Spring 2001 Module and Calendar Schedules for your
review. Please note the Jones Graduate School is not following the
traditional University Calendar for Spring Break this year. If you have
any questions please contact me.
Kathy
Kathy M. Spradling
MBA Program Coordinator
Jesse H. Jones Graduate School of Management
Rice University
6100 Main Street, MS 531
Houston, Texas 77005-1892
Phone: (713) 348-3313
Fax: (713) 348-5251
Email: [email protected]
http://www.rice.edu/jgs
E-mail: [email protected]
http://www.ruf.rice.edu/~jgs/
- Spring Module 2001 Sch.doc
- Spring Module 2001 Cal.doc | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Steve,
It makes sense to meet with Abacus. Retail marketing is very data intensive.
If you set up a meeting with them,
please, let me know.
Vince
Steven R Meyers@EES
04/11/2000 08:17 AM
To: Timothy Edward Vail/HOU/EES@EES
cc: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Resco Database and Customer Capture
Tim,
I hope things are going well in Resco. I think somebody from Resco (or
Research) may be interested in the email I received below from Brad Davids.
Brad is now working at Abacus who works with residential customer patterns as
well as predictive modelling. He's going to be here the 25 and 26 of this
month. I'm not sure who is responsible for Resco Marketing, but I think they
would find this interesting. Who should I send this to? Please let me know
if anybody in Resco may have any interest.
Thanks,
Steve
PS: Vince, simply an FYI since they do focus on modelling and research.
---------------------- Forwarded by Steven R Meyers/HOU/EES on 04/11/2000
08:14 AM ---------------------------
Bradley Davids <[email protected]> on 04/10/2000 08:35:32 PM
To: "'[email protected]'" <[email protected]>
cc:
Subject: RE: Possible Meeting?
Steve:
I'll see if I can get in on the 25th . . . will let you know, but I think
it'll work.
Just to give you a very brief overview so you can think about who might be
interested, Abacus has the largest transactional database of consumer buying
behavior in the world (89 million US households, 3 billion+ purchases),
along with sophisticated modeling capabilities to help predict customer
response to various offers at the household level. Given the critical need
to reduce customer acquisition costs in retail energy markets, we believe
that our data and modeling can help energy retailers target their direct
marketing efforts toward the residential customers most likely to respond to
whatever the offer is--improving the efficiency of mailings and other
promotional campaigns (so there is an efficiency angle, see!)
Because our data allow the modeling of future buying behavior based on
actual purchases, our results tend to be significantly more predictive than
demographic-based models. So far, the the response from utilities and "new
entrants" I've been talking to so far has been quite positive, and we have
some tests of our data underway, but we're interested in talking to as many
players in the market as possible as we develop specific products to meet
utility needs.
I can provide more background if desired to whoever might be interested, but
I guess the key immediate question is whether it might be worthwhile to
arrange a short meeting sometime on the 25th of April with whoever at Enron
might have interest in hearing what we're up to, and (most importantly)
listening to what your data needs might be as you enter new markets.
Thanks very much for any help . . . I look forward to catching up and
hearing how things are going for you.
Regards,
Brad Davids
303-410-5531
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Monday, April 10, 2000 12:13 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Possible Meeting?
It'd be great to meet on the 25th in the afternoon. I have a flight in the
evening. I'm interested in hearing about life at abacus. I too have heard
that Enron is getting back into the residential market. What type of
database do you have? I might be able to find somebody for you to talk
with here.
-Steve
Bradley Davids <[email protected]> on 04/10/2000 12:04:00 PM
To: "Steve Meyers (E-mail)" <[email protected]>
cc:
Subject: Possible Meeting?
Steve:
Sorry we've been unable to hook up . . . I can probably get down there on
the 25th, if you're going to be in town that afternoon? Would love to catch
up--both on how things are going with EES and tell you about my new life.
Also, I'm hearing rumors that Enron is about to get back into the
residential market in a big way--you know anything about that? Anybody I
should talk to there about my huge database of consumer buying behavior?
Thanks--looking forward to connecting . . . I'll be travelling most of this
week, but you can leave a VM and let me know when I can call you, or try me
on the cell at 303-886-3458.
Best,
Brad Davids
--------------------------------------------
Bradley J. Davids
Associate Vice President, Utilities
Abacus Direct, a division of DoubleClick, Inc.
11101 West 120th Avenue
Broomfield, CO 80021 USA
e-mail [email protected]
tel 303.410.5531
fax 303.410.5300
www.doubleclick.net
www.abacus-direct.com
(See attached file: C.DTF) | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Deborah Fugate
20 Pierce Drive
Novato, CA 94947
[email protected]
To Mr. Ken Lay,
I'm writing to urge you to donate the millions of dollars you made from selling Enron stock before the company declared bankruptcy to funds, such as Enron Employee Transition Fund and REACH, that benefit the company's employees, who lost their retirement savings, and provide relief to low-income consumers in California, who can't afford to pay their energy bills. Enron and you made millions out of the pocketbooks of California consumers and from the efforts of your employees.
Indeed, while you netted well over a $100 million, many of Enron's employees were financially devastated when the company declared bankruptcy and their retirement plans were wiped out. And Enron made an astronomical profit during the California energy crisis last year. As a result, there are thousands of consumers who are unable to pay their basic energy bills and the largest utility in the state is bankrupt.
The New York Times reported that you sold $101 million worth of Enron stock while aggressively urging the company's employees to keep buying it. Please donate this money to the funds set up to help repair the lives of those Americans hurt by Enron's underhanded dealings.
Sincerely,
Deborah Fugate | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Please look for them and discuss with Nikki
-----Original Message-----
From: Slade, Nikki
Sent: Friday, November 30, 2001 7:34 AM
To: Kitchen, Louise
Subject: Do you still have your Ayscough relocation flight tickets?
The tickets will have expired but you should be able to get a refund on the return portion them. Here's what Ayscough have said:-
Having spoken to Continental in London, they say that Houston may not
entertain a refund or reissue, but London would certainly action a refund
only back to the original card. If they need assistance get them to forward
documents direct to us.
Best regards
Snickie | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
CDWR is proposing to all potential suppliers the following security package
for new PPA's:
1) Irrevocable PUC Order / Agreement that "locks in the revenue stream" for
CDWR to cover the PPA costs.
2) PPA covenant that the power supplier has payment priority over any debt,
including the contemplated debt issue
- the concept is that the supply is the operating cost and any debt would
be subordinate
3) PPA Covenant that their is a uniform package to all suppliers; no more
favorable terms or priority to ayone, no L/C, etc.
Subject to definitive language, CDWR is trying to get people to buy into this
general plan. What do people think? Please try to shoot holes in this.
Please forward to the appropriate legal, regulatory and credit folks to air
this out.
Thanks,
Chris | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Zimin, thanks for the meeting yesterday, your help is going to be very
valuable for the analysis of our deal.
Below you will find the names of the comparable companies you can use for the
study of the volatility:
Cablevision
Comcast
Cox Communications
MediaOne Group
Rogers Communications
Time Warner
Morgan Stanley Dean Witter published a memorandum on January 5/00 "US
Investment Research: Cable Television" where you can get detailed
information on the performance of these companies
We will be working on the histogram during the weekend and we will be sending
the results to you as soon as possible.
Regarding the quotes for the loan guarantee we will be getting them on Monday.
Please let me know if you will need any additional information for the
volatility study
Thanks and Regards,
Maria Elena | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
please sign me up
----- Forwarded by Elizabeth Sager/HOU/ECT on 11/07/2000 03:54 PM -----
"Andy Katz" <[email protected]>
11/07/2000 03:12 PM
To: <[email protected]>
cc:
Subject: Fwd: Reply now to join the OSPBC group
As discussed.
Andrew S. Katz, Director Industry Legal Affairs
Edison Electric Institute
701 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20004
Voice: 202-508-5616
Fax: 202-508-5673
e-mail: [email protected]
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Received: from mu.egroups.com by mail.eei.org; Mon, 30 Oct 2000 17:34:55 -0500
X-eGroups-Return: [email protected]
Received: from [10.1.2.230] by mu.egroups.com with NNFMP; 30 Oct 2000
22:33:23 -0000
Received: (qmail 55885 invoked by uid 65534); 30 Oct 2000 22:33:23 -0000
Date: 30 Oct 2000 22:33:23 -0000
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
From: OSPBC moderator <[email protected]>
Reply-To: confirm-invite-k3X5JWmKF7t6PS52TspJ7LCycg4-akatz=eei.org@egroups.com
To: [email protected]
Subject: Reply now to join the OSPBC group
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Hello,
Reply to this email to join the OSPBC group,
an email group hosted by eGroups, a free, easy-to-use email group
service.
JOIN NOW, IT'S EASY: reply to this email by choosing "Reply" and then
"Send" in your email program.
By joining OSPBC, you will be able to exchange messages
with other group members. eGroups also makes it easy to store
photos and files, coordinate events and more.
Here's an introductory message from the group moderator:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hello,
Welcome to the OSPBC group at eGroups, a
free, easy-to-use email group service. Please
take a moment to review this message.
To start sending messages to members of this group,
simply send email to
[email protected]
If you do not wish to belong to OSPBC, you may
unsubscribe by sending an email to
[email protected]
You may also visit the eGroups web site to modify your
subscriptions:
http://www.egroups.com/mygroups
Regards,
Moderator, OSPBC
------------------------------------------------------------------------
TO JOIN THIS GROUP:
1) REPLY to this email by clicking "Reply" and then "Send"
in your email program
-OR-
2) Go to the eGroups site at
http://www.egroups.com/invite/OSPBC?email=akatz%40eei%2Eorg&iref=k3X5JWmKF7t6P
S52TspJ7LCycg4
and click the "JOIN" button
If you do not wish to join the OSPBC group, please
ignore this invitation.
SPECIAL NOTE FROM eGroups: Because eGroups values your privacy,
it is a violation of our service rules for moderators to abuse our invitation
service. If you feel this has happened, please notify us at [email protected]
- Andy Katz.vcf | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
This may sound like a silly question, but why? Is this something Ben wants
Matt doing?
1-4 are all the CO's I know about.
I'm out today, but we can discuss it tomorrow, and I can explain my point of
view.
Kay
From: Rebecca Walker 12/18/2000 10:18 AM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: LM 6000 Documentation
Kay
Have you had a chance to collect the following information for Matt Tezyk:
The free storage letter from GE
Any correspondence between GE and you relating to all 24 turbines
Any change orders in addition to #1-4
Documentation on any other deals we have made with GE
Please let me know if I can help with this. If possible, I'd like to get
this information to Matt some time early this week.
Regards,
Rebecca | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Amy,
You mentioned that it sometimes takes a while for the shiftwork differential
to be credited. Please note that I need to have it credited. And, can I
expect my signing bonus to appear on my May 1st paycheck?
Thank you for your help,
Eric | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
W E E K E N D S Y S T E M S A V A I L A B I L I T Y
F O R
May 18, 2001 5:00pm through May 21, 2001 12:00am
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SCHEDULED SYSTEM OUTAGES:
ARDMORE DATA CENTER - FACILITY OPERATIONS: No Scheduled Outages.
AZURIX: No Scheduled Outages.
EB34 DATA CENTER - FACILITY OPERATIONS: No Scheduled Outages.
EDI SERVER: No Scheduled Outages.
ENRON CENTER SOUTH DATA CENTER - FACILITY OPERATIONS: No Scheduled Outages
ENRON NORTH AMERICAN LANS: No Scheduled Outages.
FIELD SERVICES: No Scheduled Outages.
INTERNET: SEE ORIGINAL REPORT
MESSAGING: SEE ORIGINAL REPORT
MARKET DATA: SEE ORIGINAL REPORT
NT: No Scheduled Outages.
OS/2: No Scheduled Outages.
OTHER SYSTEMS: ALSO SEE ORIGINAL REPORT
Impact: CORP
Time: Sat 5/19/2001 at 5:00:00 PM CT thru Sun 5/20/2001 at 12:00:00 AM CT
Sat 5/19/2001 at 3:00:00 PM PT thru Sat 5/19/2001 at 10:00:00 AM PT
Sat 5/19/2001 at 11:00:00 PM London thru Sun 5/20/2001 at 6:00:00 AM London
Outage: Board replacement for E10K deathstar (chewbacca/skywalker).
Environments Impacted: ErMS/Tagg
Purpose: Replace center plane support board that has bad part due to the power outage last week.
Backout: Leave the old board in with the defective sensor(doesn't stop systems from working)
Restart in old condition
Contact(s): Malcolm Wells 713-345-3716
Impact: CORP
Time: Sun 5/20/2001 at 4:30:00 PM CT thru Sun 5/20/2001 at 6:30:00 PM CT
Sun 5/20/2001 at 2:30:00 PM PT thru Sun 5/20/2001 at 4:30:00 PM PT
Sun 5/20/2001 at 10:30:00 PM London thru Mon 5/21/2001 at 12:30:00 AM London
Outage: Moneypenny Update Production
Environments Impacted: Corp
Purpose: Releasing new code to production.
Backout: Roll code back
Contact(s): Brent Tiner 713-853-7495
SITARA: SEE ORIGINAL REPORT
SUN/OSS SYSTEM: No Scheduled Outages.
TELEPHONY: No Scheduled Outages
TERMINAL SERVER: No Scheduled Outages.
UNIFY: SEE ORIGINAL REPORT
SCHEDULED SYSTEM OUTAGES: Australia
Impact: CORP
Time: Sat 19-May-2001 at 10:00:00 AM Sydney thru Sat 19-May-2001 at 3:00:00 PM Sydney
Sat 19-May-2001 at 1:00:00 AM GMT (London) thru Sat 19-May-2001 at 6:00:00 AM GMT (London)
Fri 5/19/2001 at 7:00:00 PM CT (Houston) thru Sun 5/20/2001 at 12:00:00 AM CT (Houston)
Fri 5/19/2001 at 5:00:00 PM PT (Portland) thru Sat 5/19/2001 at 10:00:00 PM PT (Portland)
Outage: Sydney UPS Test & Service
Environments Impacted: Corp Sydney - all systems
Purpose: Original UPS needs testing & service. Will require Server Room to be de-powered to allow maintenance.
Backout: Plug equipment into unconditioned power.
Contact(s): Colin Wood +61-416-248-363
Elliott Katz +61-292-292-309
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FOR ASSISTANCE
(713) 853-1411 Enron Resolution Center
Specific Help:
Information Risk Management (713) 853-5536
SAP/ISC (713) 345-4727
Unify On-Call (713) 284-3757 [Pager]
Sitara On-Call (713) 288-0101 [Pager]
RUS/GOPS/GeoTools/APRS (713) 639-9726 [Pager]
OSS/UA4/TARP (713) 285-3165 [Pager]
CPR (713) 284-4175 [Pager]
EDI Support (713) 327-3893 [Pager]
EES Help Desk (713)853-9797 OR (888)853-9797 | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
what time? i will be up for some boozing | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Dear Jason Wolfe,
This letter is to inform you of some NETeller updates:
Secure ID Added
As an added feature and to ensure your security, the design team at
NETeller.com has instituted the NETeller Secure ID feature into its signup
process. The Secure ID will provide an additional layer of security to all
NETeller.com members and will ensure that no one other than the authorized
account holders can have access to their NETeller.com accounts.
How it works
All NETeller.com account holders will be emailed a 5 or 6 digit Secure ID.
This Secure ID will be unique to each individual NETeller.com account holder.
Your new Secure ID is: 885892
The Secure ID will be changed and updated approximately every 4 months and
this change will be emailed to all account holders at that time.
Upon successfully entering the users Account ID and Password, each user will
be prompted for their Secure ID code. By entering the Secure ID, users will
gain access to their account page. If you forget or lose your Secure ID code
you may contact our customer service department at 888 258 5859 to retrieve
it.
NOTE REGARDING PASSWORDS
You will NEVER be asked to reveal your NETeller.com password by a
NETeller.com representitive.
You should NEVER give your password out to any unauthorized user.
Passwords should be changed regularly and often.
Thank you
The NETeller.com Development Team | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
We are working with the guys at Elektro on this. Elektro had a preliminary discussion with AA Brazil about this and they don't understand CVM's position on this. Elektro is meeting with AA again today and we will know more this afternoon. Elektro is meeting with CVM and Elektro lawyers are working on this. The CVM must approve the Elektro debenture sale so this will delay the process. Elektro has 15 days to respond to CVM decision. We are working on the issues with the guys at Elektro.
Sommers
-----Original Message-----
From: Weidler, Peter E
Sent: Monday, November 12, 2001 8:11 AM
To: Sommers, Jeffrey E.
Subject: fyi - Elektro
Brazil: Elektro must revise balance sheets
Valor Economico, 12 Nov 2001, p. b-7:-
The Brazilian electricity supply company Elektro must change and publish again its balance sheets of 2000 and of the first two quarters of 2001 according to a decision from the Brazilian Securities Commission (CVM) and with the changes the losses registered by the company in those periods will increase.
CVM is against two procedures used by Elektro which were based on future profit expectations in a term between 10 and 20 years since it is too risky to make estimations for such a long term. The procedures are related to the accounting of social contributions and income tax credits.
Elektro is controlled by the US company Enron. | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
your net payout is $224.50
how do you want me to get the check to you?
-----Original Message-----
From: Bryan Hull [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Sunday, January 06, 2002 6:20 PM
To: Bass, Eric
Subject: ffl
Hey Bass, what's up? I hope you had a nice Christmas/New Year's. So, what
does second place pay? and what do I owe for that other league? and I owe
you $40 (20 for the Auburn LSU tickets, and 20 for Texas ending up higher in
the polls than LSU, I'll admit that bet was a lot closer than I thought it
would be at the end of the season, Geaux Tigers!!) So let me know if I still
have any money coming to me or if I'm in the red. Take it easy,
Bryan | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
That's funny, because that's the guy who Mike Swerzbin and Matt Motley told
me agreed to ADP the deal. I just gave him a call, but no answer. I'll try
back in a bit, but I think we should be fine considering Mark Watts
supposedly already agreed.
Thanks a lot,
Kate
Melissa Ann Murphy
12/06/2000 06:17 AM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Southern Contact
Hi Kate, the person at Southern that called Joe Hunter is Mark Watts. His
phone number is (678) 579-3470. He may be a trader.
Let me know if you need anything else.
Thanks,
Melissa
(713) 853-1886 | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
According to Rhonda we never use BP Amoco however, she thinks the Calgary
office does.
Thanks
Kate Symes @ ECT 04/12/2001 03:13 PM
To: Evelyn Metoyer/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:
Subject: Re: deal 580011
I've changed this to BP Energy - and I was wondering - didn't BP Amoco change
over to BP Energy? Do we ever trade with the old counterparty name anymore?
Kate
Evelyn Metoyer@ENRON
04/12/2001 12:29 PM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: deal 580011
Cara Semperger
deal 580011
CP name should be BP Energy not BP Amoco.
Thanks | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 06/26/2000
10:55 AM ---------------------------
"Bryson, Allen" <[email protected]> on 06/26/2000 09:17:07 AM
To: "'[email protected]'" <[email protected]>
cc:
Subject: Request for two powerpoint presentations from RISK 2000 conferenc e
Vince,
I would like to receive copies of both your energy risk and weather
presentations from the Risk2000 conference in Boston.
Thanks,
Allen Bryson
Conoco | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Hey guys,
Further to our meeting, here (courtesy of John T) are the addresses to view
the peaker data for our upcoming testing:
a. O:\_Dropbox\PeakerData\Peakers1999.htm
b. O:\_Dropbox\PeakerData\Peakers2000.htm
At the present time, these pages display on Microsoft Internet Explorer only.
Type in the above URLs in the address area of your IE. The pages refresh
automatically once every minute.
Cheers, --Scott | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
CALENDAR ENTRY: APPOINTMENT
Description:
Britt Davis -Bushton conf: 4823
Date: 3/30/2001
Time: 10:00 AM - 11:00 AM (Central Standard Time)
Chairperson: Outlook Migration Team
Detailed Description: | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Chris -
Would you mind e-mailing Evelyn your contact information at the APX? And I
can't recall whether or not we wanted to confirm these trades. Let me know
when you get a chance, and I'll take care of it with the Confirms group.
Thanks,
Kate
---------------------- Forwarded by Kate Symes/PDX/ECT on 04/30/2001 03:02 PM
---------------------------
Evelyn Metoyer@ENRON
04/30/2001 03:01 PM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Automated Power Exchange
Kate, have we started using this brokerage firm yet. If so, do you have any
phone numbers to contact them? Also, do you know how we are going to confirm
their trades?
Thanks | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 02/12/2001 09:32
AM ---------------------------
"Townsend, Christopher J. - CHI" <[email protected]> on
02/09/2001 06:45:58 PM
To: "'Kay Mann (E-mail)'" <[email protected]>
cc: "Elam, Michael H. - CHI" <[email protected]>, "Shindler,
Donald A. - CHI" <[email protected]>, "Gershon, Mark A. - CHI"
<[email protected]>, "Nooney, Kathleen L. - CHI"
<[email protected]>, "Fein, David I. - CHI"
<[email protected]>, "Nora, Mark J. - CHI"
<[email protected]>, "Way, Karen S. - CHI"
<[email protected]>
Subject: Illinois Projects Update
> Kay --
>
> Attached please find the update regarding ENA's Illinois projects. Please
> do not hesitate to contact me with any questions or comments regarding the
> status of the various projects.
>
> We are still working to find a date for the PMRW attorneys on the "Enron
> Team" to come to Houston to meet with the Enron attorneys and project
> development leaders. Please let us know if there are dates or times that
> would be more convenient for you.
>
> Thank you. Have a Great Weekend!
>
> Christopher J. Townsend
> Piper Marbury Rudnick & Wolfe
> 203 N. LaSalle Street
> Chicago, IL 60601
> (312) 368-4039 (direct line)
> (312) 630-6300 (direct fax)
> [email protected]
> <<Z_9Q17_.WPD>>
>
____________________________________________________________________________
The information contained in this communication may be confidential, is
intended only for the use of the recipient named above, and may be legally
privileged. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you
are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, or copying of this
communication, or any of its contents, is strictly prohibited. If you have
received this communication in error, please re-send this communication to
the sender and delete the original message and any copy of it from your
computer system.
Thank you.
For more information about Piper Marbury Rudnick & Wolfe, please visit us at
http://www.piperrudnick.com/
____________________________________________________________________________
- Z_9Q17_.WPD | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
I am advised by the EI help desk in Houston that I must obtain EI security
clearance before I can be granted access to this database. Are you able to
assist me by sending a message to EI security? Thanks. Sara | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
hiya--
Sorry I never sent back the longer email I said I would... I don't seem to get a lot done these days without a fair amount of nagging, etc. Did you only ski on Friday? Why are you skiing on Thurs this week when you have to turn around and go back to work on Friday? As for Keystone: yuck. I have to say that I would be happy if I never skied at that place again. (I generally don't like the mtn, PLUS it was the scene of the crime re: my knee injury...) I did make it up last weekend: skied Vail on Sat and it was GREAT. The snow conditions were amazing and certainly the weather was just beautiful. A friend from business school needs to burn a few vacation days so he flew to Denver last night and is skiing today and tomorrow with some random friends from Ft. Collins, then I told him I'd take Friday off and ski with him Fri and Sat. Hopefully it'll be Copper on Fri and Vail on Sat.
As for the next step... I'm sort of a fan of meeting sooner rather than later. Unfortunately, this weekend is looking a little messy (and yes, I'm in Philly right now, will return tomorrow night, then out again on Sun...) Maybe we can try talking in the interim? My cell # is 720-244-5976 and I'm usually around in the evenings...
:-)
Steph
ps--how were the new skis?? Funny, my new parabolics (ok, really they were new 2 seasons ago, but I didn't ski last year, so they're still new to me... :-) are 187's. At this rate, I'm afraid I'd actually notice the 3cm difference! :-)
[email protected] wrote:
Hey,
How have you been? Are you on the road again? As I said I went skiing last week and the conditions were actually very good. We skied Keystone and although they didn't have the majority of the runs open, the ones that were open were nice. I think I may ski again either tomorrow or this weekend.
What about you have you skied yet.
So what's the next move with us, are we ever going to talk in person? I'm not sure how you advance in the internet dating scene, any ideas?
Paul
*********************************************************
ADDITIONAL TIPS from Match.com:
Our anonymous re-mailer will strip away your real email address, so
that it will NOT appear in the 'From:' line.
You may also contact this person from their Match.com profile by
clicking 'Contact this person' and composing your message directly from the
site.!
However:
* Check to ensure that your email address is not in the BODY of your
message as we are unable to remove these.
* Check to ensure that you REMOVE ANY AUTOMATIC SIGNATURE at the end of
your email. And note that you cannot use 'Cc:' or 'Bcc:' if you want
your email to remain anonymous.
Match.com does not monitor private email between members, nor are we
liable for the content of these messages. All members are bound by our
Match.com Service Agreement.
_____
Do You Yahoo!?
Check out Yahoo! Shopping and Yahoo! Auctions for all of your holiday gifts!
*********************************************************
IMPORTANT TIPS TO REMAIN ANONYMOUS AT Match.com:
If you use the "reply" button to respond to this message, please take the following steps:
1. DELETE ALL TEXT from the body of your message, including header information which may include your actual email address.
2. REMOVE ANY AUTOMATIC SIGNATURES which may include your personal contact information.
Our anonymous re-mailer will strip away your real email address (in the From: field), so that it will NOT appear in the "From:" line. However, DO NOT use the "Cc:" or "Bcc:" fields as these addresses CANNOT be stripped away.
You may also contact this person from their Match.com profile by clicking "Contact this person" and composing your message directly from the site.
Match.com does not monitor private email between members, nor are we liable for the content of these messages. All members are bound by our Match.com Service Agreement. | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Iris
The power prices are not financially settled, they are settled by physical delivery, the gas prices are settled against 'Gas Daily' index. What we will need to also look at is, the contractual provision, for 2003 onwards, when the RTO is expected to kick in.
Also, lets look at some other term sheets and make a more robust one. What might be a good idea is to call John Llodra and see if he has any old ones he could mail us.
Harry
-----Original Message-----
From: Mack, Iris
Sent: Monday, November 05, 2001 10:32 AM
To: Arora, Harry; Blair, Greg
Subject: RE: Synthetic Peaker
Greg,
Attached is a term sheet for the TVA tolling deal.
Please call us on the options desk to discuss after you've taken a look at it.
Thanks,
Iris Mack
x3-6711
-----Original Message-----
From: Arora, Harry
Sent: Monday, November 05, 2001 8:37 AM
To: Mack, Iris
Subject: FW: Synthetic Peaker
-----Original Message-----
From: Blair, Greg
Sent: Friday, November 02, 2001 3:45 PM
To: Blair, Greg; Arora, Harry
Cc: Cavazos, Brandon
Subject: RE: Synthetic Peaker
P.S. I'm in NY, at home, if either of you need to speak with me. 516 746-1751.
-----Original Message-----
From: Blair, Greg
Sent: Fri 11/2/2001 3:43 PM
To: Arora, Harry
Cc: Cavazos, Brandon
Subject: RE: Synthetic Peaker
Harry and Brandon:
Just got off the phone with the customer. Seems we were sufficiently off the market that they didn't see any upside in stringing us along. I told them that the indicative price came from our structuring group and that we would now try to tighten things up directly with the desk. Ergo, we get another shot. Let's make it a good one.
-----Original Message-----
From: Arora, Harry
Sent: Fri 11/2/2001 12:38 PM
To: Blair, Greg
Cc:
Subject: RE: Synthetic Peaker
Greg
1. Who made these prices ?
2. Is this a into TVA product
3. Is this a 3 yr starting 2003 they are asking for ?
4. How much size are they interested in ?
5. Is this a day ahead 5x16 (16 hour minimum) product or is there a 4hr/8hr min ?
Harry
-----Original Message-----
From: Blair, Greg
Sent: Friday, November 02, 2001 12:25 PM
To: Arora, Harry; Cavazos, Brandon
Subject: FW: Synthetic Peaker
Harry and Brandon:
Apparently, we are not as competitive as we need to be here. Let me know if there's anything we can do here to make this more attractive. My quote to them is at the bottom of the thread.
-----Original Message-----
From: "Hilson, D. Wayne" <[email protected]>@ENRON
Sent: Fri 11/2/2001 11:07 AM
To: Blair, Greg
Cc: Goza, Stuart L.
Subject: RE: Synthetic Peaker
Greg:
We have completed our evaluation of the two proposed structures (1) May
through September and (2) June through August for a three year duration
beginning in 2003. Unfortunately, based on the prices quoted below, neither
evaluates well enough that we would want to pursue any further. We
appreciate your interest and remain interested in any future proposals you
may want to offer.
Regards,
Wayne Hilson
(4230 751-2916
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [ <mailto:[email protected]>]
Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2001 5:33 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: Synthetic Peaker
Any idea on timing of a response? Just curious.
-----Original Message-----
From: "Hilson, D. Wayne" <[email protected]>@ENRON
Sent: Monday, October 15, 2001 4:06 PM
To: Blair, Greg
Subject: RE: Synthetic Peaker
Thanks.
We'll be in touch.
-----Original Message-----
From: Blair, Greg [ <mailto:[email protected]>]
Sent: Monday, October 15, 2001 3:32 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Synthetic Peaker
Wayne:
May 1 through Sep 30: $5.83/kw-mo
Jun 1 through Aug 31: $8.78/kw/mo
Heat Rate: 10,900
VOM: $1.63/MWh
Term: 3 years
Start: 2003
Availability: 5x16
Delivery: Into TVA
Regards, Greg
**********************************************************************
This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate
and
may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the
intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by
others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or
authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or
reply
to Enron Corp. at [email protected] and delete
all
copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not
intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence
a
binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its
affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not
be
relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise.
Thank you.
********************************************************************** | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Here is the alternate language. | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Luckysurf.com has the perfect post-holiday gift for you.
Play now, and you'll be entered to win a Samsung Electronics
Gift Certificate or $1,000 CASH Instantly. Plus, you'll automatically
be entered in the Daily $1-Million Jackpot Drawing!
http://r.pm0.net/s/c?u9.1fpo.1.9bb.2vvcl
Just click below, pick 7 numbers, register, then click a banner.
That's it. No Catch. No Clause. And it takes just a minute.
Winning has never been so easy or so fun!
http://r.pm0.net/s/c?u9.1fpo.2.9bb.2vvcl
Good Luck,
The LuckySurf.com Team
<<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>>
* To remove yourself from this mailing list, point your browser to:
http://i.pm0.net/remove?iexpect:10
* Enter your email address ([email protected]) in the field
provided and click "Unsubscribe". The mailing list ID is "iexpect:10".
OR...
* Reply to this message with the word "remove" in the subject line.
This message was sent to address [email protected]
X-PMG-Recipient: [email protected]
<<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>>
pmguid:u9.1fpo.2vvcl | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
scrub yourself down
-----Original Message-----
From: Miller, Jeffrey
Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2001 9:24 AM
To: Forney, John M.
Cc: Bolt, Laurel; Grace, Rebecca M.
Subject: Another item for Mark Patterson
TECO asked us to scrub this down.
<< File: Ramping Issue for Deployments.xls >> | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
That's totally fine...see you guys tomorrow night!
>From: [email protected]
>To: [email protected]
>Subject: Re:
>Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2001 16:09:55 -0600
>
>
>I'll be there at 7:00. Barbara is planning on going, but will probably be
>late. Around 8:00. She likely just meet us for drinks. Is that a
>problem?
>
>
>
>
>
> "Laura Gammell"
> <lauragammell@ho To: [email protected]
> tmail.com> cc:
> Subject: Re:
> 03/26/2001 12:56
> PM
>
>
>
>
>
>
>I made reservations at the Red Cat Jazz Cafe, 924 Congress between Main and
>Travis for 7:00 p.m. tomorrow night. One catch...if everyone is not there
>by 7:15 p.m. then they will yank our reservation because they have live
>music and need the tables or something sketchy like that. Anyway, see you
>tomorrow...oh I included a reservation for Barbara so let me know if she
>can't make it.
>
>
> >From: [email protected]
> >To: [email protected]
> >Subject: Re:
> >Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2001 11:00:21 -0600
> >
> >
> >That sound cool. I will schedule it up.
> >
> >
> >
> > "Laura Gammell"
> > <lauragammell@ho To:
>[email protected]
> > tmail.com> cc:
> > Subject:
> > 03/21/2001 11:58
> > AM
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >Hey Gerald-
> >Ryan's big birthday is coming up this Tuesday, March 27th...wanted to get
> >some people together for a nice dinner downtown, around 7:00. Please
>feel
> >free to bring Barbara along too! I still need to make reservations at a
> >restaurant..if you can think of any place great, let me know. Hope you
> >guys
> >can make it!
> >
> >ciao!
> >_________________________________________________________________
> >Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>_________________________________________________________________
>Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com
>
>
>
>
_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Suzanne:
I need to schedule a 1 hour meeting with Julia to talk about maternity leave
issues. Could you please work with her secretary to set something up next
week? Thanks.
Carol | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Tommorrow at 2:00 or later works for me. Thanks
Erica Braden
07/21/99 12:46 PM
To: Peggy Banczak/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sandi M Braband/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mary
Cook/HOU/ECT@ECT, Shonnie Daniel/HOU/ECT@ECT, Shawna Flynn/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Barbara N Gray/HOU/ECT@ECT, Gerald Nemec/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stephen W Van
Hooser/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ann Elizabeth White/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mary Ogden/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Robert Walker/HOU/ECT@ECT, Erica Braden/HOU/ECT@ECT, Pat Radford/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Becky Tlucek/HOU/ECT@ECT, Wende Warren/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kimberlee A
Bennick/HOU/ECT@ECT, Taffy Milligan/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Reviews
Barbara would like to conduct reviews on Thursday and Friday of this week.
Please e-mail me at your earliest convenience to let me know what time I can
schedule your review. Reviews will be conducted during the hours of 9:30 -
4:30 and will last approximately 30 minutes each.
Thanks, E. | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
this was a regular 30 day deal. | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
I am on vacation and will return to the office on March 18. | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
my number is (713)807-1699 | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Chris,
I shall get a copy of the book on Monday and will get a copy of the paper for
you.
Vince
-----Original Message-----
From: Cramer, Chris
Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2001 2:22 PM
To: Kaminski, Vince J
Subject: referenced paper by Akerlof
Mr. Kaminski,
Your reference to Mr. Akerlof's article interested me. How could I obtain a copy so that I can read it in its entirety?
Thanks and Best Regards,
Chris Cramer | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Security -- FYI
Stacey -- I've redirected to proper email address
thanks
spc
-----Original Message-----
From: White, Stacey W.
Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2002 2:33 PM
To: Deleon, Roberto
Cc: Zheng, Min; Lee, Norman; Cox, Paige
Subject: FW: M:/Common/power folder
Roberto,
Can you please add to the m: drive a first tier directory of common. Please let me know ASAP that this is complete.
Thanks,
Stacey White
Director, Power Risk Management
713-853-1870
-----Original Message-----
From: Zheng, Min
Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2002 2:05 PM
To: White, Stacey W.; Evans, Casey; Postlethwaite, John; Reeves, Kathy
Cc: Lee, Norman
Subject: RE: M:/Common/power folder
Dear Stacey,
The person should be in Roberto Deleon term (X58824).
Thanks!
Min Zheng
-----Original Message-----
From: White, Stacey W.
Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2002 1:54 PM
To: Zheng, Min; Evans, Casey; Postlethwaite, John; Reeves, Kathy
Cc: Lee, Norman
Subject: RE: M:/Common/power folder
Who do we ask to set up the m:\common? This makes the most sense to me.
Stacey
-----Original Message-----
From: Zheng, Min
Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2002 1:28 PM
To: White, Stacey W.; Evans, Casey; Postlethwaite, John; Reeves, Kathy
Cc: Lee, Norman
Subject: M:/Common/power folder
Importance: High
Dear All,
In Enron system, M:\common\power is one of our major folder. In UBS system, it is changed to M:\power. I wonder whether we need to create a new folder:
M:\common, then move M:\power under M:\common\ and become M:\common\power just as Enron system. Otherwise, we at least need to spent a lot of time to find out and change all path pointers and fixed links of Excel application under power folder. Also, if too many files dynamic links are messed up, we may be able to ask system team to rebuild power folder for us.
Thanks!
Min Zheng | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
You got it.
-----Original Message-----
From: Dasovich, Jeff
Sent: Monday, July 30, 2001 4:02 PM
To: Comnes, Alan
Subject: Re: FW: 5 State Energy Advisors Fired Over Conflicts Ethics: The
consultants were involved in buying electricity for California from a
generator whose stock they owned, setting up a clash of official duties,
personal interests.
we're always looking for new recruits, eh? | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
-----Original Message-----
From: Panus, Stephanie
Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 10:14 AM
To: Theriot, Kim S.
Subject: Updated terminations
Kim,
The attached list contains some counterparties that were previously on the Master Termination Log and have now been determined to be valid terminations. | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Grant,
I shall be in the office for a few hours today (looks like food poisoning).
I shall try to call you from home.
I don't see any major problem. I shall call David Oxley and ask how we could
structure the rehire so that you are not hosed this year.
Vince
"Grant Masson" <[email protected]> on 12/13/2000 11:07:12 PM
To: <[email protected]>
cc:
Subject: Message from Grant
Vince:
?
Having now the benefit of some experience with El Paso, I conclude that
Enron would offer more for me in the long term.? If you have an interest in
discussing the matter further, please give me a call. I would appreciate
your comments.?
?
Best Regards,
Grant.
?
(Mobile) 281 381 9983
(Home) 713 664 7260 | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
FYI--
The information below is an excellent overview of the procedures our administrative personnel will be using when handling and distributing your mail into mail folders. However, all administrative personnel in the Portland Enron WTC offices have received a hard copy of the guidelines and procedures issued by Oregon Department Administrative Services. This four-page document has detailed guidelines and instructions for mail/parcel handling. If you would like to get a copy of these guidelines, ask your administrative assistant or you can contact Debra Davidson to get a copy. The World Trade Center Mailroom has informed Debra that they are also screening mail for lumps, powdery substances, unusual written comments on envelopes, etc. If they detect a suspicious piece of mail or package addressed to our office, they will notify us as well as the proper authorities.
If you have any questions or concerns, please see me or Debra Davidson.
-----Original Message-----
From: Enron Announcements/Corp/Enron@ENRON On Behalf Of John Brindle, Business Controls@ENRON
Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2001 7:42 PM
To: Enron Employees ---- Domestic@ENRON
Subject: Anthrax and other Biological Agent Threats
We understand that the recent cases of Anthrax contamination and the possibility that biological agents such as Anthrax may be used in a terrorist attack are raising great concerns among Enron employees. Many government and commercial facilities in the United States have already received Anthrax threat letters containing powdery substances. Most of these have, however, been determined to be false alarms. We have no reason to believe that Enron has been or will be the target of an Anthrax attack, but we want to provide all employees with background information on Anthrax and up-to-date guidance for handling any possible Anthrax exposures.
If you have additional questions or concerns, please contact Corporate Security in Houston at (713) 345-2804 or via email at [email protected].
The most important thing to remember is: Do not panic. To infect someone, the Anthrax organism must be rubbed into abraded skin, swallowed, or inhaled as a fine, aerosolized mist. Infection can be prevented after exposure to Anthrax by early treatment with the appropriate antibiotics. Anthrax cannot be spread from one person to another.
Following are guidelines for identifying and dealing with suspicious letters or packages:
What constitutes a suspicious letter or parcel? (Remember, these are only guidelines. Use your best judgment when determining if a letter or package is suspicious.)
-- It is marked with the word "Anthrax."
-- It has a non-identifiable powdery substance on the outside.
-- It is unexpected or from someone unfamiliar to you.
-- Is addressed to someone no longer with your organization or is otherwise outdated.
-- Has no return address, or has one that cannot be verified as legitimate.
-- Is of unusual weight, given its size, or is lopsided or oddly shaped.
-- Has an unusual amount of tape on it.
-- Is marked with restrictive endorsements such as "personal" or "confidential".
-- Has a strange odor or stain.
-- Shows a city or country in the postmark that does not match the return address.
What do I do if I receive such a letter or package that I believe contains Anthrax?
-- Do not shake or empty the contents of any suspicious envelope or package.
-- Place the envelope or package in a plastic bag or some other type of container to prevent leakage of contents.
-- If you do not have any container, then cover the envelope or package with anything (e.g., clothing, paper, trash can, etc.) and do not remove this cover.
-- Leave the room and close the door, or section off the area to prevent others from entering (i.e., keep others away).
-- Wash your hands with soap and water to prevent spreading any powder to your face.
-- Notify your local building security official or an available supervisor. Have them call 911 to alert the local police authorities.
-- List all people who were in the room or area when this suspicious letter or package was recognized. Give this list to both the local public health authorities and law enforcement officials for follow-up investigations and advice.
If you open an envelope or package and a suspicious powder spills out:
-- Do not try to clean up the powder. Cover the spilled contents immediately with anything (e.g., clothing, paper, trash can, etc.) and do not remove this cover!
-- Leave the room and close the door, or section off the area to prevent others from entering (i.e., keep others away).
-- Wash your hands with soap and water to prevent spreading any powder to your face. Report the incident to your local building security official or an available supervisor. Have them call 911 to alert the local police authorities.
-- Remove heavily contaminated clothing as soon as possible and place in a plastic bag, or some other container that can be sealed. This clothing bag should be given to the emergency responders for proper handling.
-- Shower with soap and water as soon as possible. Do not use bleach or other disinfectant on your skin.
-- If possible, list all people who were in the room or area, especially those who had actual contact with the powder. Give this list to both the local public health authorities so that proper instructions can be given for medical follow-up, and to law enforcement officials for further investigation. | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
The Worthington Steel Company - they have an ISDA
I also show ENA financial exposure for the following companies for steel:
Dennen Steel Corp
Balli Trading Ltd
Huntco Steel
Metalwest LLC
Triorient Trading Inc.
Webco International LLC
Some may not be regular financial deals - but structured ones - such as Huntco, Balli, and Webco. Sam Leuschen is the best contact to discuss the deals as she was involved in the booking of all of them.
Thanks,
Tanya
-----Original Message-----
From: Shackleton, Sara
Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 9:13 AM
To: Rohauer, Tanya
Subject: Paper/steel positions
Tanya:
Is there a way to identify outstanding financial/physical positions with respect to these products?
I'd like to cross check to see which counterparties have sent termination notices.
I've already spoken to Bob who will compile his list for me to track.
Sara Shackleton
Enron Wholesale Services
1400 Smith Street, EB3801a
Houston, TX 77002
Ph: (713) 853-5620
Fax: (713) 646-3490 | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
For any reason, if you need Unify support, please use the on call pager:
713-285-8739. Someone will respond to you. Since we've been some problems lately, I wanted you to be aware of this pager number. Please inform your group.
Thanks! | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
The Gas NOPR/NOI is not on the agenda for the upcoming FERC meeting. That's
good news from the standpoint that it gives us time to present a proposal on
pricing ROFR.
I also thought that you would be interested to know that Gay Friedmann and
Lorraine Cross are meeting next week with McLane Layton (the potential FERC
replacement). So while Jerry Halvorsen reports that INGAA will likely take
no position, it sounds like INGAA staffers are moving forward at meeting the
candidates. That makes me feel more comfortable moving forward with out
Enron call with Ms. Layton. (FYI - Cynthia also reports that El Paso
actively backed Ms. Layton when her name surfaced during a prior FERC
vacancy). | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
This one was gas only.
-----Original Message-----
From: Storey, Geoff
Sent: Tuesday, November 06, 2001 3:04 PM
To: Gossett, Jeffrey C.
Subject: RE: ENA GAS COMMODITY CASHFLOWS FOR 10/30/01
was this just gas? or gas and power?
-----Original Message-----
From: Gossett, Jeffrey C.
Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2001 1:21 PM
To: Storey, Geoff
Subject: FW: ENA GAS COMMODITY CASHFLOWS FOR 10/30/01
-----Original Message-----
From: Carrington, Clara
Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2001 1:21 PM
To: Gossett, Jeffrey C.
Cc: Glover, Sheila
Subject: ENA GAS COMMODITY CASHFLOWS FOR 10/30/01
<< File: 103001_ENAGAS_COMMODITY_NOTIONAL_CASHFLOWS.xls >>
Clara Carrington
Financial Trading
Manager - Rate and Currency Risk Mgmt
Direct Tel: (713) 853-9224
Email: [email protected] | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Start Date: 1/7/02; HourAhead hour: 3; No ancillary schedules awarded. Variances detected.
Variances detected in Load schedule.
LOG MESSAGES:
PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final Schedules\2002010703.txt
---- Load Schedule ----
$$$ Variance found in table tblLoads.
Details: (Hour: 3 / Preferred: 340.92 / Final: 340.89)
TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
LOAD_ID: PGE3
MKT_TYPE: 2
TRANS_DATE: 1/7/02
SC_ID: ENRJ | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Forwarded at request of Joe Hillings:
Please find attached the final CSI letter sent to President Clinton on
the WTO services negotiations. Thank you for your comments and
contributions to the letter.
Best regards,
Liesyl
--
**********************************
Liesyl I. Franz
Director
Coalition of Service Industries
805 15th Street, NW, Suite 1110
Washington, DC 20005
Tel: 202-289-7460
Fax: 202-775-1726
E-mail: [email protected]
http://www.uscsi.org
Visit http://www.worldservicescongress.com for recommendations and
proceedings from the World Services Congress in Atlanta, GA November
1-3.
- Ltr-Clinton-Svcs negs 2000.doc | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Getting more information in this person and getting him to contact Congress is very important. He is in the district of House Chief Deputy Whip Roy Blunt (R-MO), who is Cong. DeLay's right-hand man in the leadership. He also serves on the Barton Subcommittee. While Linda, Pat and I had breakfast with him next week, and he will be in Houston for next month, he and his staff stress that he is close to public power in his district, which includes Springfield, MO. Did he have a prepared statement at the RTO Week hearing?
-----Original Message-----
From: Landwehr, Susan M.
Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2001 5:12 PM
To: Shelk, John
Cc: Hueter, Barbara A.; Robertson, Linda; Nord, Sue; Shortridge, Pat; Novosel, Sarah; Shapiro, Richard; Guerrero, Janel; Steffes, James D.
Subject: FW: RTO Week -- Summary of Standards and Practices Panel
John--this is the recap from Thursday afternoon of RTO week. Although Andy did not focus on it in his report, there was an individual who sat on the panel from Missouri that did a fantastic job of supporting FERC and market postitions despite the fact that he is a public power guy. His name is Bill Burks and he is the Associate General Manager of the City Utilities of Springfield, Missouri. In his comments he stated that his utility was "wholeheartedly supporting FERC moving forward to push for on RTO" and then went on to talk about how Missouri is going to continue to suffer from seams issues if FERC doesn't stick to their guns on just a few major RTOs.
He stated that "flexible" standardization would not work and that the FERC should put out a platform of standardized tariffs and if there was some utility or group of stakeholders that thought they were special or unique or different, then the burden of proff should be on them to petition FERC for an exemption, not the other way around.
I'm thinking that this gentlemen would be an excellent choice for a committee hearing if you have the opportunity to suggest folks to testify in the future. IF you are able to get transcripts from RTO week, it might also be worth it to review his comments and pass them on as appropriate.
-----Original Message-----
From: Rodriquez, Andy
Sent: Thu 10/18/2001 4:46 PM
To: Black, Tamara Jae; '/o=ENRON/ou=NA/cn=Recipients/cn=notesaddr/cn=a478079f-55e1f3b0-862566fa-612229'; Abler, William; Aggarwal, Anubhav; Allen, Diana; Arora, Harry; Bailey, Debra; Ballato, Russell; Ballinger, Ted; Baughman Jr., Don; Benchluch, Moises; Benjelloun, Hicham; Benson, Robert; Bentley, Corry; Blaine, Jay; Bolt, Laurel; Broderick, Paul J.; Broussard, Richard; Burnett, Lisa; Campbell, Larry F.; Capasso, Joe; Carson, Mike; Chen, Alan; Choate, Jason; Cline, Kevin; Collins, Dustin; Comeaux, Keith; Coulter, Kayne; Davis, Mark Dana; Day, Smith L.; Dean, Clint; Decook, Todd; Emesih, Gerald; Errigo, Joe; Forney, John M.; Freije, William; Garcia, Miguel L.; Gilbert, Gerald; Gilbert-smith, Doug; Giron, Gustavo; Greer, Andrew; Gualy, Jaime; Guerra, Claudia; Gulmeden, Utku; Gupta, Gautam; Ha, Amie; Hanse, Patrick; Hernandez, Juan; Imai, Rika; Ingram, David; Jenkins IV, Daniel; Kaniss, Jason; King, Jeff; Kinser, John; Larkworthy, Carrie; Laurent, Dean; Laverell, Justin; Lenartowicz, Chris; Lorenz, Matt; Lotz, Gretchen; Lowell, Thomas; Mack, Iris; Mahajan, Ashish; Makkai, Peter; Marquez, Mauricio; Maskell, David; May, Tom; McElreath, Alexander; Miller, Jeffrey; Oh, Seung-Taek; Olinde Jr., Steve; Pace, Andy; Padron, Juan; Pan, Steve; Philip, Willis; Podurgiel, Laura; Poppa, John D.; Presto, Kevin M.; Quenet, Joe; Rawal, Punit; Rogers, Benjamin; Rust, Bill; Ryan, David; Saibi, Eric; Schiavone, Paul; Schneider, Bryce; Seely, Michael; Serio, Erik; Shoemake, Lisa; Simpson, Erik; Stalford, Robert; Stepenovitch, Joe; Sturm, Fletcher J.; Symms, Mark; Tamma, Ramanarao; Thomas, Paul D.; Trejo, Reese; Valdes, Maria; Vernon, Clayton; Wang, Steve; Williams, Ryan; Willis, Cory; Zipperer, Mike; Baughman, Edward D.; Clynes, Terri; Dalton III, Oscar; Kelly, Mike E.; Sewell, Doug; Valderrama, Larry; Walton, Steve; Roan, Michael; Perrino, Dave; Maurer, Luiz; Hueter, Barbara A.; Landwehr, Susan M.; Hoatson, Tom; Novosel, Sarah; Nicolay, Christi L.; Yeung, Charles
Cc:
Subject: RE: RTO Week -- Summary of Standards and Practices Panel
RTO Week
Day 4 - October 18, 2001
Afternoon Session
Standardizing Markets, Business, and Other Practices
Panelists for this discussion were: Sarah Barpoulis, PG&E National Energy Group; William P. Boswell, GISB; Bill Burkes (substituting for David J. Christiano), City Utilities of Springfield, Missouri; David N. Cook, NERC General Counsel; Michael Kormos PJM Interconnection; LeRoy Koppendrayer, Minnesota Public Utilities Commission; and Marty Mennes, Florida Power & Light Company.
General Observations
The Commissioners were all present the majority of the time (Massey left late in the afternoon). FERC Staff was active in the discussion; however, the commissioners were very active as well, asking perhaps as much as 70% of all questions. There was a general consensus that standards were needed; much discussion focused simply on how much and by who. The Commission seemed very interested in leaning what they needed to do to move the industry forward and how far they needed to go. Panelists urged the need to mover forward as quickly as possible, but both they and FERC seemed to recognize that some of the issues regarding standardized market design and such needed to be addressed before RTOs could really begin to move forward. There was discussion on identifying which industry group (NERC or GISB) would take the reins in the future. On an interesting tangential note, there was noticeable conflict between NERC and GISB, with veiled insults between the two organizations somewhat common during the discussions.
FERC Deliverables
A great deal of the discussions focused on identifying what the industry needed from the Commission. Staffers probed all panelists to find what they felt was critical.
The first major topic was "How many RTOs? What is their scope?" All panelists seemed to agree that this question needed to be answered immediately by FERC, in strong definitive language. N o one offered any specific language, but seemed to be urging FERC to issue a formal statement.
The next topic was, "What will be standard market design?" Panelists varied on this, but most felt strong guidance from FERC is urgent. Some urged for one mandatory design for North America, one supported a set of rigid standard designs, one supported a single design with requests for exceptions (followed by an in-depth review process), and one seemed to prefer the current situation.
The commission in general seemed to be very interested in understanding what the industry needed to move forward. They continually visited this topic throughout their discussions, asking questions like, "Do we need to issue a Mega-Order that addresses all these issues?" and, "How much detail do you need us to provide?" General feel from the panelsists seemed to be they wanted strong leadership in this areas. Kormos and Burkes went so far as to say FERC should "Mandate as much as they felt comfortable - and then go a little further." Others seemed to be a little worried about this idea, but in general did not oppose the concept, citing only general warnings and the need for cautious investigation.
One item of interest: Wood referred to the filing made by the Electronic Scheduling Collaborative and specifically asked if the items identified in the "RTO Design and RTO Implementation" section would address many of the questions and uncertainty facing the industry with regard to RTO design. Kormos indicated that clear and specific answers to these questions specifying a course of action would go a long way toward guiding the industry. The section to which Wood referred was one that I wrote, and asked the following questions:
? Congestion Management - When Operational Security Violations occur, how is the system to be stabilized in a fair and equitable manner that is nonetheless efficient? Will LMP based systems be standard, or will there be others that must be accommodated?
? Transmission Service - Are transmission services required to schedule ("covered" schedules only), or are they risk management tools protecting from congestion charges (both "covered" and "uncovered" schedules are allowed)?
? Loop Flows - Are contract-path based or flow-based transmission services appropriate? If contract-path based, how are parallel path issues to be addressed?
? Grandfathered Transmission Service - Should contracts existing prior to RTO development be transferred, or is there an equitable way to retire those contracts? Are there other solutions?
? Energy Imbalance Markets - How are imbalance markets to function? Will they serve as real-time energy markets (support unbalanced schedules), be limited to supplying needs of imbalance service (require balanced schedules), or will they be required at all?
? Ancillary Services - Will ancillary service markets be developed in standard ways? Will entities be required to actually schedule ancillary services (required to schedule), or will they be treated primarily as financial instruments (protecting against real-time POLR charges)?
? Losses - Can we utilize the imbalance markets to support losses? Can we create specific loss standards that facilitate the scheduling process, or must we support methods that are currently in tariffs, but technically unwieldy?
? Non-Jurisdictionals - How are non-jurisdictionals to be integrated into the new world? Should systems be designed with the assumption that non-jurisdictional will be part of an RTO? Or should they be designed to treat each NJE as a separate entity?
Hopefully, FERC will use this section as a template to answer these critical questions in an assertive manner, and give some solid direction in which to move. Kormos emphasized the need for concrete answers to these questions, pointing out that vague answers (i.e., "do congestion management") will take a year or two to resolve, but specific answers (i.e., "LMP with financial hedging instruments") will take only months. The Commission asked Mike about moving forward, and he told them that effectively, it was impossible to move forward with implementation without getting these issues addressed.
Now for a funny point - One of the commissioners (I think Breathitt) referred to some concerns expressed in the Northwest that their high concentration of hydro power makes LMP inefficient for the Northwest. Kormos flat out said, "My profession is understanding how power systems work, and I don't believe that that statement is true." He then backpedaled a bit and said that it would need more study, but he stood by his statement that the assertion by the Northwest interests was false.
NERC and GISB
A great deal of discussion focused around the need for a single standard-setting organization. Massey went so far as to ask, "Are we looking at a beauty contest between NERC and GISB?" Cook and Boswell then went into several short polite jabs at each other's organizations. Other participants continually reiterated the need for ONE, INDEPENDENT organization. Interestingly, Boswell was very emphatic about the established trust and respect in GISB, while Cook preferred to only talk about the "new" structure of NERC and did not focus on its history.
Brownell offered some not-too-subtle passive support of GISB by pointedly asking both Cook and Boswell if they lobbied political positions (i.e., were they not only an organization but also a stakeholder?). GISB was easily able to say they were not, but NERC of course had to admit to their romancing of Congress and the Bush administration for reliability legislation. Point, Brownell.
Mennes acted as somewhat of a supporter for NERC, playing Dave Cook's yes-man. He probably did them a little bit of harm by pointing to NERC's supposed "successes," such as TLR and E-Tag. If staffers have tenure, they will likely remember that these "successes" have not been so successful, resulting in several filings and interventions. We may also wish to file comments in specific objection to these claims, to refresh their memory and to show the pretty picture Marty painted was in fact a fiction.
There was a little discussion about splitting reliability and market issues, but general consensus was that I could not be done. There was also some talk of folding NERC under GISB/EISB.
The arguments began winding down after a some time, and Boswell strongly urged the Commission to speak to industry executives and advocacy group leadership to see whether NERC or GISB should lead the industry forward. NERC somewhat less enthusiastically supported this position. In general, I would say it was a close fight but GISB came out more on top.
Let me know if you have any questions.
Andy Rodriquez
Regulatory Affairs - Enron Corp.
[email protected]
713-345-3771 | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
just messing with you.
-----Original Message-----
From: Erin Richardson <[email protected]>@ENRON
Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 3:22 PM
To: Lenhart, Matthew
Subject: RE:
i am not grilling you and i am not an angry person at all. are you kidding?
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 3:17 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE:
i am not fighting with you at all. you are just grilling me. you are an
angry person.
-----Original Message-----
From: Erin Richardson <[email protected]>@ENRON
Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 3:00 PM
To: Lenhart, Matthew
Subject: RE:
whatever, i did not flip out. i remember everything. stop fighting
with
me.
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 3:00 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE:
i was sober and i remember how it went down. i said one rude thing in
the
car and that was it. you were just going nuts and wouldn't let it die.
you kept flipping out on me.
-----Original Message-----
From: Erin Richardson <[email protected]>@ENRON
Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 2:49 PM
To: Lenhart, Matthew
Subject: RE:
no, that's wrong. you just kept saying one rude thing after another
which
bothered me. it doesn't matter. the point is that it should not be
so
difficult for you to not be rude.
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 2:48 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE:
only one thing i said was rude, which i apologized for, and you
wouldn't
let it die. most of the stuff was started by you. you were just
venting
frustration you weren't able to communicate when you're sober.
-----Original Message-----
From: Erin Richardson <[email protected]>@ENRON
Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 2:41 PM
To: Lenhart, Matthew
Subject: RE:
i only rolled back over once. i said i was sorry for saying i
wished
you
were dead, i was just kidding, and i wouldn't have to vent for so
long
if
you wouldn't give me reasons to. some of the things you said last
night
were pretty rude.
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 2:37 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE:
you kept rolling back over and laying into me. you are the one
who
said
you wished i was dead. you went crazy. you were pissed all
night.
you
were venting on a soap box for about 2 hours.
-----Original Message-----
From: Erin Richardson <[email protected]>@ENRON
Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 2:33 PM
To: Lenhart, Matthew
Subject: RE:
i was not going nuts. i was trying to go to sleep and you kept
bringing
it
up. you're nice, but you have an attitude. very cocky.
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 1:42 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE:
i was being nice. you kept starting it and then blaming it on
me.
you
were going nuts.
-----Original Message-----
From: Erin Richardson <[email protected]>@ENRON
Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 1:03 PM
To: Lenhart, Matthew
Subject: RE:
you deserved it b/c you are a jerk. you really need to
start
being
nicer.
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 12:37 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE:
you were letting me have it. i deserved some of it b/c i
made
some
bad
jokes, but overall you were pretty brutal. i think i am
heading
to
baton
rouge for the game this weekend instead of partying for
halloween.
-----Original Message-----
From: Erin Richardson <[email protected]>@ENRON
Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 12:28 PM
To: Lenhart, Matthew
Subject: RE:
no. why was i mad?
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 12:29 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE:
you still mad at me? you were pissed last night.
-----Original Message-----
From: Erin Richardson <[email protected]>
@ENRON
Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2001 1:50 PM
To: Lenhart, Matthew
Subject:
you better be getting excited about dinner. i'm not
taking
you
if
you
aren't.
**********************************************************************
This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its
relevant
affiliate
and
may contain confidential and privileged material for the
sole
use
of
the
intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or
disclosure
by
others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the
intended
recipient
(or
authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact
the
sender
or
reply
to Enron Corp. at
[email protected]
and
delete
all
copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments
hereto)
are
not
intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not
create
or
evidence
a
binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or
any
of
its
affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other
party,
and
may
not
be
relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by
estoppel
or
otherwise.
Thank you.
********************************************************************** | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
How could resist being part of the Light Brigade?
[email protected] on 12/04/2000 04:53:47 PM
To: [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected]
cc:
Subject:
During the EPC discussions, today in Sao
Paolo, someone from ESA commented on the attached article and
how it's our "new" future. The discourse then degenerated
into how "complex" those types of contracts must, to which I
quickly pointed out that they were in fact quite complex.
It's like Rigby says, "EES -- we do better lightbulbs".
Who Says Exit Signs Aren't Exciting
Enron Energy Services (EES) is undertaking a rapid expansion
into overhauling inefficient lighting systems for current and
future customers. This includes the replacement of
illuminated exit signs in commercial buildings -- 25,000 of
which EES recently procured for installation over the next
year. As part of this effort, EES teamed with Global
Strategic Sourcing and DealBench to create a 45 percent
savings over the old procurement process. In a highly
successful collaboration, EES provided the technical
specifications and market pricing information, GSS provided
the deal expertise, and DealBench provided the technology.
These illuminated exit signs, which will be used in the new
Enron building and in commercial buildings of our customers,
are big energy savers. Whereas exit signs typically use 40
watts, the new signs use 4 watts. In addition, typical exit
signs use fluorescent or incandescent lamps. The new exit
signs use light emitting diodes (LEDs) and will achieve a 60
to 90 percent savings in electrical consumption. But it
doesn't stop there. The internal lamps that illuminate the
exit signs typically need to be replaced every six months to
a year. The LED-illuminated exit signs, however, only require
replacement every eleven years. | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
This is a list of subscription & publication information, compiled by
different regions, regarding developments in energy and broadband.
INDIA
Leena Mathews @ ENRON_DEVELOPMENT 06/13/2000 06:23 AM
We do not specifically subscribe for broadband/commnunications related
magazines. News items related to the above are always covered in the business
magazines below. They are equivalent to the Fortune and Forbes
PUBLICATIONS SUBSCRIPTION RATE ONLINE WEBSITE
Business India us $85
10, Pearl Mansion,
91, Maharashi Karve Road
Bombay - 400 020
Tel # 91 22 200 9274/206 9276
Fax # 91 22 200 6669
Businessworld www.businessworldindia.com
Business Today www.Business-today.com
Powerline www.indiapoweronline.com
Indian Infrastructure US $ 150 (1 yr)
PowerLine, D-4/5 Vasant US $ 270 (2 yrs)
Vihar, New Delhi - 57 US $ 350 (3 yrs)
Tel # 91 11 615 2322
Fax # 91 11 615 2344
e-mail: [email protected]
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
ASIA & AFRICA
From: John Ambler@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on 06/07/2000 02:54 PM
We do not currently subscribe to such trade publications for Asia and
Africa. We do deal with and monitor a number of publications, but many are
not in English. Two useful online publications are www.nni.nikkei.co.jp and
www.energyasia.com.
As for major magazines, Nikkei Business is the premier business magazine in
Japan. In most areas there are major newspapers that are more influential.
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
++++
EUROPE
Iona Maclean@ECT
05/23/2000 03:33 AM
We think that the following are the best publications for you to access (this
can be done on-line)
- FT On-line http://www.business.ft.com/energy_login.html
This site covers all the financial times publications. Enron Europe have a
special deal with FT on-line where everyone can access the service for free.
You can also access the following on-line
- Utility Week and Utility Europe www.utilityweek.com
- The Economist http://www.economist.com/
If you are interested in specific coverage I would be happy to include you in
my distribution lists. Please call me on +44 207 783 5331 if you have any
further questions.
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
++
LATIN AMERICA
Dennis Vegas@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
05/09/2000 08:53 AM
International/Regional
Global Finance
Latin Trade
Latin Finance
Newsweek Americas
WSJ Americas
Financial Times (great intl coverage)
Newsletters
Latin America Monitor (online we subscribe for CALME only to Andean Region,
Central America, Caribbean and Middle East editions)
Latin America Power Watch
Latin America Energy
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
JAPAN
From: Michael Grimes@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on 05/08/2000 08:38 AM
I'm trying to get a subscription to the Nikkei, which has an electronic site
at:
http://www.nni.nikkei.co.jp/
I also have a free subscription to the PMA news site, which has proved
useful. http://www.powermarketers.com/main.htm
I would call the Nikkei the closest to Forbes in Japan. | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
i actually started writing this on thursday. got distracted and left late
morning to go to Vail. Apparently I missed a little craziness. My point on
v/x is that forward spreads, months 3/4 and back, don't necessarily trade on
value, they trade on drawing a forward curve that makes equilibrium between
hedging and spec demand. Look at k/m... do you think k cash will average 3
cents above m. i don't really see that scenario. yet that's what it is
worth because the market says jv is worth $x and to get there k/m=3. The
same argument applies to v/x. i think this summer will be exceptionally
strong as we try to inject 2 bcf/d more gas than last year. But cal 2 will
lag the move. It's the main thing customers are selling right now because
every equity analyst and even Pira are telling their customers that cal 2
will average 3.50. so either the v/x and x/z spreads come in or f/g g/h h/j
blow out. After this winter, who in there right mind wants to buy f/g or g/h
again. my thought is that the primary juice will be h/j but v/x and x/z will
be under some pressure. i'm a seller at 9 and buyer at 5-6. Not much in it
either way though.
[email protected] on 01/31/2001 04:47:22 PM
To: [email protected]
cc:
Subject: Re: v/x
you got me wrong-i wanna sell oct buy nov forward. look-two scenarios med
longer
term. we inject like mad early summer-economy stays crappy the frot of the
curve
gets slaughtered.-oct/nov goes to 3 cts sometime between now and end sep
scenario 2-they dont enject what they want-oct /nov wil stay tite between
say
3-and 10 cts like this year but man after this winter they will panic at some
point and buy the hell out of the winter strip and blow out oct /nov to 30 cts
cuz they panic. to me if that one was to ever backwardate it was this
summer-low
low stx and injections and they still blew out cuz they panicked about
winter-as
we see this winter now for good reason..?? capeche? i thinkit a win win
you still in the damn mar/apr-i only sold a little prenumber-cant beleive how
this got killed after-what changed?? from 1:30 to 2:05
[email protected] on 01/31/2001 05:41:45 PM
To: Steve LaFontaine/GlobalCo@GlobalCo
cc:
Fax to:
Subject: Re: v/x
quit pressuring them i want to sell some too. actually sold a few at 9
on the close
[email protected] on 01/31/2001 12:40:07 PM
To: [email protected]
cc:
Subject: Re: v/x
i hate hate that sprd-at 8 cts i think its such a good bearsprd-hope it
keeps
coming in. ill tell you why later | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
ok alstott and troy brown for holt?
-----Original Message-----
From: Rabon, Chance
Sent: Wednesday, October 10, 2001 8:06 AM
To: Bass, Eric
Subject: RE:
I would want an average wr and a solid back. you wont be willing to give up either moss or owens, and your remaining backs are not steller(although alstott seems to be doing well.
-----Original Message-----
From: Bass, Eric
Sent: Wednesday, October 10, 2001 8:02 AM
To: Rabon, Chance
Subject: RE:
not my fault - like i knew that jamal was going to blow out his knee - i didn't offer terrell davis.
what do you want for torry?
-----Original Message-----
From: Rabon, Chance
Sent: Wednesday, October 10, 2001 8:01 AM
To: Bass, Eric
Subject: RE:
what about him? you make me nervous, everyone you offer me for him gets hurt for the rest of the season.
-----Original Message-----
From: Bass, Eric
Sent: Wednesday, October 10, 2001 7:56 AM
To: Rabon, Chance
Subject:
torry holt? | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.