text
stringlengths 1
1.59M
| meta
dict |
|---|---|
Jeff,
The GISB drafting meetings are going to be at Williams' offices in the
Galleria. They will be on the afternoon of Monday, May 21st, all day Tues
May 22 and the morning of Wed May 23 . I will give you more details when I
get them.
Stacy | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Dear Vince,
How are you? Well I hope.
I hope you don,t mind me writing to you. You may remember that 5 months ago
I left Risk Publications and moved to a charity. Having been here for only a
few months, I have decided that this job is not for me (I miss the buzz of a
corporate office) and I have decided to move back into the corporate sector.
Because of my previous experience and knowledge of the energy sector, I am
very interested in moving into this area. I have always thought that it
would be great to work for Enron because it is such a dynamic company and I
am planning to approach the London office to discuss any opportunities,
which might be available. I am particularly interested in product marketing
and research, although I am very open-minded at the moment. I wondered
whether you could recommend the right person to speak to in London.
I know that you are incredibly busy, but any help you can give me would be
fantastic Vince.
Thanks and best regards,
Vicky Windsor
_________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.
Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at
http://profiles.msn.com. | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
I'll be here. | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
I'm interested in donating. Can I find out more info about the specifics of
the procedure and the timing?
Kevin Ruscitti
x3-6320 | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION
Texas Gas Transmission Corporation Docket No.
RP01-278-002
NOTICE OF COMPLIANCE FILING
(October 22, 2001)
Take notice that on October 17, 2001, Texas Gas Transmission Corporation
(Texas Gas) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, First
Revised Volume No. 1, the following tariff sheets to become effective
October 1, 2001:
Primary
Third Revised Sheet No. 181
Third Revised Sheet No. 182
Third Revised Sheet No. 183
Sheet No. 184 (reserved)
Second Revised Sheet No. 185
Alternate
Alternate Third Revised Sheet No. 181
Alternate Third Revised Sheet No. 182
Alternate Third Revised Sheet No. 183
Texas Gas states that this filing is being submitted in compliance with the
Commission's Order issued on September 19, 2001 in the above-referenced
docket. As directed, the tariff sheets removed the daily high/low index
price for cash-out. In response, Texas Gas proposes to establish a
cash-out price based on a weekly high/low index price determined from the
weeks within the applicable month, plus the first week of the following
month. The primary and alternate sheets require in-kind make-up of
imbalances up to 2% and use the same index price for imbalances above
5%.
However, the primary sheets also propose to eliminate cash-out for all
imbalances up to 5% by also requiring a mandatory in-kind make-up level
from 2% to 5% and by eliminating any use of the 100% price index for this
tier of imbalance.
Texas Gas states that copies of the revised tariff sheets are being mailed
to Texas Gas's jurisdictional customers and interested state commissions.
Any person desiring to protest said filing should file a protest with the
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington,
D.C. 20426, in accordance with Section 385.211 of the Commission's Rules and
Regulations. All such protests must be filed in accordance with Section
154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests will be considered by the
Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not
serve to make protestants parties to the proceedings. Copies of this filing
are on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection.
This filing may also be viewed on the web at http://www.ferc.gov using the
"RIMS" link, select "Docket#" and follow the instructions (call
202-208-2222 for assistance). Comments, protests and interventions may be
filed electronically via the Internet in lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR
385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the Commission's web site under
the "e-Filing" link.
David P. Boergers
Secretary | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
If you would like to contribute to a monetary gift of Special Thanks to
Reggie (for all his assistance throughout the year). Please drop off your
contribution to either Shawna Flynn in EB3893 or Taffy Milligan in EB3887.
We would like to present the gift to him before lunch on Friday.
Thank you, in advance, for your participation. | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Jim, per our telephone conversation, your list will include the following in Category 2
Robert Eickenroht
Rex Rogers
Sharon Butcher
Kriste Sullivan
Rob Walls
Paula Rieker
Chuck Cheek
Stephanie Harris
Let me know if I omitted anyone from the list. Thanks.
Sheila Walton | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Start Date: 4/19/01; HourAhead hour: 13; No ancillary schedules awarded. No
variances detected.
LOG MESSAGES:
PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001041913.txt
---- Energy Import/Export Schedule ----
*** Final schedule not found for preferred schedule.
Details:
TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
SC_ID: ECTRT
MKT_TYPE: 2
TRANS_DATE: 4/19/01
TIE_POINT: SLVRPK_7_SPP
INTERCHG_ID: EPMI_CISO_ZEBRA
ENGY_TYPE: NFRM | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
The report named: CE P/L <http://trv.corp.enron.com/linkFromExcel.asp?report_cd=4&report_name=CE+P/L&category_cd=3&category_name=CENTRAL&toc_hide=1&sTV1=3&TV1Exp=Y¤t_efct_date=10/18/2001>, published as of 10/18/2001 is now available for viewing on the website. | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Whew!! Your schedule makes me tired! I am sure that Brigeda is happy that
you are involved in so many activities with her school - and then on the
other hand, sometimes you wonder if they notice! Work sounds crazy for you,
but how nice that you will be off from December 21 until the 2nd.
I hope that make it over the week before Christmas. The week is kind of
crazy for us, so I am trying to find a time that will work. Sunday the 17th
we are having a dessert party at our house, inviting neighbors, old Huntwick
friends, etc. It is for families, and Meagan and Amanda each included 4 of
their friends in the invitiation list, along with their familities. It will
be multi-generational - I hope fun, as it would be a nice tradition to
continue. On Monday, I think that David plans to take Tyler and Amanda to
Longview for a visit. A commitment that Meagan and I have to sort toys at
Northwest Assistance Ministries from 12:30 to 4:00 that day has excused us
from the trip. So it may be best for Meagan and me to drive over to Austin
after 4:00 on Monday. We could be back by the time David and company return
to Houston on Tuesday afternoon. Wednesday we have matinee tickets to see A
Christmas Carol at the Alley Theater, sans Tyler. Thursday I am having all
of my girls in NCL over to wrap gifts for the family that we have adopted for
Christmas and then we will deliver the presents. And Friday is Tyler's
birthday, with a 102 Dalmation theme planned (cake ordered from RJ Goodies,
but nothing else done yet!). So I really think that our only shot to make it
to Austin is for Monday night, which would mean only Meagan and me.
I talked with Mom last night and invited Dad and her to Houston for
Christmas. I don't really think that they will come, but if they do, I hope
that doesn't mess up your Christmas. They have only been here for one or two
Christmases with us since we have had kids. I think that Tyler at 3 this
year will be particularly enthralled. And next year they will have 2
grandchildren in Austin, so it just seemed that this could be a good year for
them to come. She said she would think about it, and I told her that I
wanted her to know that we would love to have them, but that it was perfectly
okay if they decided that they did not want to come.
How about Dad playing golf this week? What a difference!! I am so glad that
he is doing better.
I hear you about Mom. I think that a blow-up or some drama is highly
predictable, unfortunately. She seems to do that a lot at special occassions
for Cara, doesn't she? I will certainly help in any way I can. And I will
be very interested in the gosipy details.
Happy baking! I do have to make 5 batches of fudge tonight and tomorrow
night so that I can attend a cookie exchange luncheon on Saturday armed with
27 packages of fudge.
"Cindy White" <[email protected]> on 12/07/2000 09:25:44 AM
To: <[email protected]>
cc:
Subject: RE: Baby Shower
Got your message last night--sorry I missed you--must have been in the
shower. We are all going nuts here, too. We have a huge deadline here at
work. But I worked most of last weekend so am ahead of the curve. Good
thing, since I have volunteered to be Martha Stewart at many school events
this week and next. LAst night was "lessons and carols" by the school
choir--with me decorating, baking, and coordinating. Today I go to school
to make Christmas stockings with the kids--Sunday is the school Christmas
Bazaar at the Four Seasons--need to bring an item for the bake sale. Also
need to start baking 12 gingerbread houses for Brigeda's class. Did find
a matching mold to the smaller one we have so I can at least bake two at
once--twelve bakes is MUCH better than 24! And then there is that dollhouse
that needs my attention by the 25!
I am totally ok with us not doing the shower. We get credit for offering
but don't have to do anything. Both money and time are in such short supply
for me that it works out for the best. At work we start on a contract for
Dell in January. The company is also going to pay for Java programming
classes for some of us (if I can nail this down then I can jump up to a
programmer level on that pay scale). I also have a private contract job
with a needlepoint store in Memphis to setup their website.
Am somewhat concerned that Mother will have one of her dramas when Cara's
baby comes...you know she will get her feelings hurt somehow. Not to
mention the fact that she will be sharing the grandchild with "the most
selfish woman on earth." Richard and Brigeda went out to the Lowrimore farm
(they sold it and offered us all of the firewood). Jane couldn't have been
sweeter to Brigeda--spent a lot of time with her. Can just imagine that
"pained" look in Mother's face at the hospital. If you are not here may
need you to carry your cell phone so I can call for moral support--or at
least give you gossipy updates on the drama....
Are you planning to come later this month when you are off? I'm taking off
the 21st and 22nd--they have given all of the technical production staff the
days between Christmas and New Years as comp time so I will be off until the
2nd...
Cindy
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Wednesday, December 06, 2000 6:51 PM
To: '[email protected]'
Subject: Baby Shower
Well, she declined our kind offer, didn't she? As busy as life is between
work and home for me right now, I can't say that it will bother me too much
to attend a shower where someone else makes the finger sandwiched and
punch! Do be on the look out for the perfect pack of diaper pins. I
noticed some at a rack at Randall's the other day... (Just kidding!)
Hope you all are doing fine. I was on jury duty three days last week -
really interesting, but totally screwed up my schedule at work. I have
been doing double-time to try to catch up, especially since I plan to be
off the week of December 18th. | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
All,
I spoke with the customer, Mike Benson. He is not angry, but he would like his accounts returned to bundled service. He understands that we are implementing a large contract with SBC Corp Real Estate, and that it is possible more of his accounts are inadvertantly on the list. He knows to contact me directly with future issues. I submitted the deal sheet to de-DASR the 2 accounts he identified to Samantha Fite a few moments ago.
I have also notified the SBC contracts manager of the situation.
Let me know if there are any questions or concerns.
Geoff
Geoff Pollard
Service Manager
Enron Energy Services
925-543-3763
-----Original Message-----
From: Pollard, Geoff
Sent: Monday, November 26, 2001 10:02 AM
To: 'Jeff Dasovich/ENRON@enronXgate@ENRON@EES'; Frazier,Lamar; James D Steffes/ENRON@enronXgate
Cc: Susan J Mara/ENRON@enronXgate; Smith,Mike B; Huddleson,Diann; Evan Hughes/ENRON@enronxgate; Rebecca Fite/ENRON@enronxgate; Riley, Tom
Subject: RE: Pac Tel - CPUC Customer Switch Complaint
Yes, I will keep you all posted. I placed a call to the customer at 7:30 this morning, but have not heard back from them yet.
Geoff
-----Original Message-----
From: Jeff Dasovich/ENRON@enronXgate@ENRON@EES
Sent: Monday, November 26, 2001 10:00 AM
To: Frazier,Lamar; James D Steffes/ENRON@enronXgate; Pollard, Geoff
Cc: Susan J Mara/ENRON@enronXgate; Smith,Mike B; Huddleson,Diann; Evan Hughes/ENRON@enronxgate; Rebecca Fite/ENRON@enronxgate; Riley, Tom
Subject: RE: Pac Tel - CPUC Customer Switch Complaint
Thanks, Lamar. Geoff, could you let us know how it goes with the customer and if this a mix-up on the customer's end. Thanks very much.
Best,
Jeff
-----Original Message-----
From: Frazier, Lamar
Sent: Monday, November 26, 2001 9:32 AM
To: Steffes, James D.; Pollard, Geoff
Cc: Dasovich, Jeff; Mara, Susan; Smith, Mike B; Huddleson, Diann; Hughes, Evan; Fite, Rebecca; Riley, Tom
Subject: Re: Pac Tel - CPUC Customer Switch Complaint
Geoff Pollard is the SM for Pac Tel.
From: James D Steffes/ENRON@enronXgate on 11/21/2001 04:01 PM
To: Lamar Frazier/HOU/EES@EES
cc: Jeff Dasovich/ENRON@enronXgate, Susan J Mara/ENRON@enronXgate, Mike B Smith/ENRON@enronXgate, Diann Huddleson/HOU/EES@EES, Evan Hughes/ENRON@enronxgate, Rebecca Fite/ENRON@enronxgate
Subject: Pac Tel - CPUC Customer Switch Complaint
I received a call late today from the CPUC (Joyce @ 415-703-2199). Someone from Pac Tel called and said that his service was switched without authorization - Mike Benson with Payphone group @707-253-8892 or 707-292-1766.
Lamar -- who is the client rep for Pac Tel? Can they get into Pac Tel and try and find out if we have done something inappropriate? We need to call this guy back by Monday EOB. Please let Jeff Dasovich know so he can call Joyce back - I'll be out on vacation next week.
Jim | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
John: That is fine with me. See you then. Mark
"Keffer, John" <[email protected]>
11/27/2000 03:14 PM
To: "Haedicke, Mark E." <[email protected]>
cc:
Subject: Meeting on Thursday
Mark-your assistant and I have confirmed that Thursday morning at 9:30 fits
our schedules. If it is okay with you, I'd like to bring to the meeting my
partners John Cogan and Philip Weems, who are handling LNG matters for
Enron. Let me know. Thanks
Confidentiality Notice
This message is being sent by or on behalf of a lawyer. It is intended
exclusively for the individual or entity to which it is addressed. This
communication may contain information that is proprietary, privileged or
confidential or otherwise legally exempt from disclosure. If you are not the
named addressee, you are not authorized to read, print, retain, copy or
disseminate this message or any part of it. If you have received this
message in error, please notify the sender immediately by e-mail and delete
all copies of the message. | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
what day is good for you?
Bryan Hull
06/30/2000 01:13 PM
To: Eric Bass/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: League is Set
I will be in Baltimore that weekend. Can we try another day? I'll be at a
family reunion all day long.
Bryan | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Hey there Mr. Fancy! How would you feel about doing some golfing this
weekend? Give me a shout.
Chris
w 713-853-1663
h 713-588-5131 | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Good to hear from you!!! I'm looking forward to hearing about your stay in
Brazil. Are you back in Houston? Let's have lunch. Sorry about the
guide. It sounds like a larger, well established hotel will have the edge on
tourism information.
Michael Herman @ ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
12/13/99 11:14 AM
To: Sara Shackleton@ECT
cc:
Subject: SP Tours
Sara:
Thanks for passing along the below address to me. The tour guide was very
nice, but a bit inexperienced and certainly not with a luxury car. It was
good for a do it yourself tour if you already have an idea of what you want
to see. It actually confirmed for me that, unless you really stay to become
involved with the people, Sao Paulo is a fairly shallow city historically and
socially. I hear, however, that there are many interesting colonial cities
in Minas Gerais, and Rio is only a 45 minute flight away.
Hope all is well.
Mike
Ms. Sonia
"GO IN"
Office: 289-3814
Cell: 9211 5399
City Tour: approx. 3 hrs.
1p. R$ 75
2p R$ 110 | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
You have received this email because the requester specified you as their Manager's alternate. Please click http://itcapps.corp.enron.com/srrs/auth/emailLink.asp?ID=000000000069182&Page=Approval to review and act upon this request.
Request ID : 000000000069182
Approver : [email protected]
Request Create Date : 10/18/01 9:50:34 AM
Requested For : [email protected]
Resource Name : Risk Acceptance Forms Air Cards
Resource Type : Applications | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
will do Gerri
-----Original Message-----
From: Gosnell, Gerri
Sent: Monday, November 05, 2001 9:25 AM
To: Quigley, Dutch
Subject: RE: EDF Man's Excess
After the past week, I've forgotten what normal was!! Thanks for your help!! Dutch, when you find out if the money is being transfered, would you please call me so that I can inform treasury?
Thanks!
gg
(281) 252-9892
-----Original Message-----
From: Quigley, Dutch
Sent: Mon 11/5/2001 9:19 AM
To: Gosnell, Gerri
Cc:
Subject: RE: EDF Man's Excess
Gerri ,
We , the financial natural gas desk , were under the impression that dealings with EDF Man are suppose to be conducted as
normal. I am calling EDF to find out why are money ahs not been wired as normal.
Dutch
-----Original Message-----
From: Gosnell, Gerri
Sent: Monday, November 05, 2001 9:11 AM
To: Quigley, Dutch
Cc: Reeves, Leslie; Hodges, Georganne; Whiting, Greg; Garcia, Paul
Subject: RE: EDF Man's Excess
Hi Dutch,
No, all he said was that he hadn't been given instructions as of yet (7:50). I've just called him again (9:05), and he said that he was told that there would be no money transfered either way???
Thanks!
gg
-----Original Message-----
From: Quigley, Dutch
Sent: Mon 11/5/2001 8:45 AM
To: Gosnell, Gerri
Cc:
Subject: RE: EDF Man's Excess
Gerri ,
Did he say why he could not confirm the money transfer ?
Dutch
-----Original Message-----
From: Gosnell, Gerri
Sent: Monday, November 05, 2001 8:41 AM
To: Garcia, Paul; Hart, Reginald; Swisher, Nera; Hodges, Georganne; Quigley, Dutch; Reeves, Leslie; Whiting, Greg
Subject: EDF Man's Excess
Good Morning!
We have excess of $4,498,358.00 with EDF Man. I called and talked with Paul this morning and he said that he could not confirm the wire for today as of yet.
I'll let you know asap.
Thanks!
gg | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
I have another meeting at 3. I'll join you late if I can. I'm just finishing up my comments on the NNG business plan and will forward shortly.
This morning I discovered and forwarded to Teb/Rob the cases of several major pipelines (Trunkline & Texas Eastern) that converted to LLC status with no protests or conditions. These were unpublished letter orders so they don't turn up on a Westlaw search. Teb agrees that these provide a very straight forward road map for us.
-----Original Message-----
From: Howard, Kevin A.
Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2002 1:42 PM
To: Corman, Shelley
Subject: TW/Border meeting
Shelley:
We are having a meeting in 49C2 at 3:00 regarding the TW/NNG deal with Jerry Peters at Border. If you are available, please feel free to join us.
Kevin | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Shirley,
The candidate for Friday. I have already talked
to him.
Vince
---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 04/26/2000
09:12 AM ---------------------------
[email protected] on 04/25/2000 11:11:23 AM
To: [email protected]
cc: [email protected]
Subject:
Hello Vince,
I enjoyed talking with you this morning. Per our conversation, here is
Norberto Valdes' resume. I will call you in about an hour to make sure you
received it. Thank you and let me know when you would like to meet him.
Sincerely,
Lisa Ford
281)913-2076
(See attached file: resumen 4.doc)
- resumen 4.doc | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Trying to find out who.
-----Original Message-----
From: Spiller, Tina
Sent: Tuesday, November 20, 2001 10:05 AM
To: Meyer, Vance
Cc: Oxley, David
Subject: Employee Post on Yahoo!
http://messages.yahoo.com/bbs?action=m&board=7081781&tid=ene&sid=7081781&mid=50629
This one says that he moved into the trading floors yesterday.
Tina Spiller
Assistant to Greg Piper
President & CEO
Enron Net Works LLC
Phone 713.853.5746
Fax 713.646.8070 | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
this is becoming somewhat redundant, but thank you.
honestly, your endorsement of me with these people means a lot. | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Would you please be so kind and take a peek at this. | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Maria:
I was waiting to see if Jason Peters ever sent a "position letter" to you
when we brought this negotiation back inhouse. Absent that information, it
appears that we had at least one issue remaining and it concerned the
disruption fallbacks, in particular, your request for both you and ENA to
each obtain two quotes and then average those quotes (the ultimate
fallback). We cannot agree to your request. The last database entry I
reflect was in October, 2000, when we were having difficulty obtaining your
response.
Given the lapse of time, we could try to generate a blackline and review the
status. Please let me know what you would like to do.
Sara Shackleton
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3801a
Houston, Texas 77002
713-853-5620 (phone)
713-646-3490 (fax)
[email protected] | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
----- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/NA/Enron on 03/13/2001 01:26 PM -----
[email protected]
03/12/2001 10:24 AM
To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
cc:
Subject: <<Concur Expense Document>> - Rob Bradley-Mar 5-6
The following expense report is ready for approval:
Employee Name: Robert L. Bradley Jr
Status last changed by: Automated Administrator
Expense Report Name: Rob Bradley-Mar 5-6
Report Total: $2,130.66
Amount Due Employee: $2,130.66
To approve this expense report, click on the following link for Concur
Expense.
http://nahou-wwxms01p | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
I spent the last few days with Rod at a CFEE conference, and he is definitely
going to run..he doesn't think that the election will occur until June so we
will at least have him in Sacto until then. The CFEE conference was the best
that I have ever attended, there were 10 members of the legislature there,
and though the focus was on air quality and power plants, the members were
expressing their frustation with the administration in not looking for
solutions and only pointing fingers..besides contracts and expidited siting,
a large part of the discussion was on educating the public...Senators Kuehl
and Machado are planning on putting together a public service announcement of
some sort for members to use in their districts on how to conserve
energy..do we have anything that would be helpful? Dion Aaroner , who chairs
the Assembly Democratic Caucus, and Rod will be doing a briefing for the
members on energy in January, do we have any basic information, like a
glossary of energy terms that I could give her, I will be with her next
Thursday. Dion is also talking to the speaker today, briefing him on what
the govenor has been doing, and asking him to call the govenor to talk about
changing his tactics. | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
bob b.
464138
should be 6x8, 1x24 | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Clem,
The recorded flow of 1,703 mmbtu on 1/5/99 has been moved from the Strangers
Gas Contract to 012-41500-02-004 for write-off purposes.
Bob | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Dear Don Baughman Jr.,
Thank you for ordering Dope Wars 2.0 for Windows through RegNet - The
Registration Network. Your order has been processed and your order number is
listed below. Please reference this in any further correspondence.
Order Number: #330038
Your registration provides: Registration code and instructions by e-mail.
Quantity: 1
Registration Cost: $6.95
Shipping & Handling: $0.00
The Total Charged: $6.95
Your online receipt is available at:
http://www.reg.net/receipt.asp?OrderNum=330038&[email protected]
If for some reason, you have not received your registration information
within 12 hours, please reply to this e-mail so we can assist you.
Be sure to visit our web site for more great software: http://www.reg.net
Thank You,
RegNet Customer Service
http://www.reg.net/
RegNet - The Registration Network | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
nuggets will win the nba next year | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Start Date: 4/1/01; HourAhead hour: 22; HourAhead schedule download failed.
Manual intervention required.
LOG MESSAGES:
PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001040122.txt
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
Error: Crawler lifetime exceeded.
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
On the ISDA replacement front, just a reminder that we want to put Morgan
Stanley Capital Group at the forefront, we have an old Energy Price Swap
Agreement in place with them, and then there's always our favorite, the old
AIG "Master Master", now with Sempra, that raises a whole host of other
issues...you were going to talk to Bill about that one...
Do you want me to put them on the list for the Legal/Credit meeting as a
reminder? | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Vince,
After talking with Catherine Flax and Shirley Crenshaw Friday January 18,
2002 at 10:30 Central (11:30) Eastern time was set up for a telephone
conference with John Woodley and Catherine Flax and yourself.
Catherine will call you at your direct number- 713-853-3848
Please contact me if there are any changes.
Thanks,
Bill
Catherine Flax Direct is 212-761-8764
William J. Toriello
Director of Energy Recruitment
Brookville Search, Inc.
212-697-8080 x3103 | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Previous version of quarterly overview report contained incorrect power
prices for 2002 and 2003-15 columns. Please see attached.
Steve | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Mark, Thor, and Todd,
Thanks for the video conference this morning. Mike and I are convinced
weather can and will be an extremely profitable business. One issue I would
like to address is EnergyDesk.com. It seems like an interesting idea, but
I'd like to find out more about it, and in relation to the work Tom Gros in
doing in NetWorks. I'd also like to understand more about the scalability of
this model, and our relationship with Kiodex.
To that end, I do not want any proprietary data, product interface, and or
other weather related matter and material to be part of EnergyDesk.com. I
will keep you updated as I learn more about these and other issues.
Regards
Jeff | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
I have copies of the Energy & Power Risk Management Glossary. If anyone
needs one, stop by. I'll leave them out on my desk.
Stephanie | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
-----Original Message-----
From: Heizenrader, Tim
Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 9:25 AM
To: Scholtes, Diana
Subject: RE: One Fish, Two Fish, Yellow Fish, Enron
Thanks! Seen this one?
Understanding Enron
FEUDALISM: You have two cows. Your lord takes some of the milk.
FASCISM: You have two cows. The government takes both, hires you to take care of them and sells you the milk.
PURE COMMUNISM: You have two cows. Your neighbours help take care of them and you all share the milk.
APPLIED COMMUNISM: You have two cows. You must take care of them, but the government takes all the milk.
TOTALITARIANISM: You have two cows. The government takes them both and denies they ever existed. Milk is banned.
MEXICAN DEMOCRACY: You have two cows. The government takes both and drafts you into the army.
EUROPEAN DEMOCRACY: You have two cows. The EU commission decides which regulations for feeding and milking apply. If there aren't any, they invent some. They pay you not to milk the cows. They take both cows, shoot one, milk the other and pour the milk down the drain. They then require you to fill out forms accounting for the missing cows.
CAPITALISM: You have two cows. You sell one and buy a bull. Your herd multiplies and the economy grows. You sell them and retire on the income.
ENRON VENTURE CAPITALISM: You have two cows. You sell three of them to your publicly listed company, using letters of credit opened by your brother-in-law at the bank, then execute a debt/equity swap with an associated general offer so you get all four cows back, with a tax exemption for five cows. The milk rights of the six cows are transferred via an intermediary to a Cayman Island company secretly owned by the majority shareholder who sells the rights to all seven cows back to your listed company. The annual report says the company owns eight cows, with an option on one more.
-----Original Message-----
From: Scholtes, Diana
Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 9:13 AM
To: Heizenrader, Tim
Subject: FW: One Fish, Two Fish, Yellow Fish, Enron
-----Original Message-----
From: Runswick, Stacy
Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 8:18 AM
To: Salisbury, Holden; Alonso, Tom; Fischer, Mark; Scholtes, Diana;
Crandall, Sean; Cutsforth, Diane; Wilson, Susie
Subject: FW: One Fish, Two Fish, Yellow Fish, Enron
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 8:07 AM
To: Runswick, Stacy
Subject: One Fish, Two Fish, Yellow Fish, Enron
Enron, according to Dr. Seuss...
They exercised and sold, exercised and sold.
And told all the employees to hold.
While they made billions, they continued to say
Our company will be the greatest someday.
But lo and behold it would not come to pass.
It was all a fraud and scam most would call crass.
"How could it be true?" we all asked.
"All we do is buy and sell gas".
But to make their personal billions
They had to keep in the dark their minions.
So they lied and cheated, stole and cajoled
Analysts, investors, workers and sold and sold.
But they found out the scam
And put the company in quite a stew.
They told Ken and Andy "we have lost confidence".
Little did they know, that confidence is what cons do.
The old man in charge said "we all trust Andy, he's fine,
He made me my fortune and never charged a dime!"
Andy got paid to manage illegal partnerships you see,
And for that he collected thirty m! illion as his fee.
But the pressure was on, and Ken had to act.
He told Andy, "You must go on leave"
Is he still on the payroll we asked?
We get no answer. Seems Andy will be there to the last.
Ken restated his books, and oh the looks that
Were on the faces of all but the crooks.
The books had been cooked! Not one year, not two, not even three,
They had been cooked a total of four.
And many suspect even more!..
He went into the elevator, that old gas trader.
He hit floor fifty, where his offices reside.
With two armed guards standing at his side.
And so he rose to the top of 1400 Smith
And went into the boardroom forthwith.
There were the ghosts of Fastow, and Skilling.
Where with their cronies they devised great scams.
How to deceive, cheat, and steal millions of clams.
And with one more scam to do
He picked up the phone and called his friend Chuck.
"Chuck", he said, " I'm in quite a jam, can! you please
help me I got caught in my scam".
So old Chuck bit a nd came to Kens side,
First with some money and took Ken as his bride.
But that old scoundrel had played too many scams
This one he could not hide as Chucks lawyers and guides
Went over Ken's books and found such a surprise.
There were no trades, there were no counterparties.
There were no assets, there was no Christmas party.
And so Chuck went to Ken and said "Your company
Is a sham. It was all lies. I cannot merge with you.
Your firm is a rotting carcass festering with flies!
And so Ken thought. He thought and he thought.
He will file Chapter eleven and fire a lot.
Four thousand to be exact.
We thought he has lost gazillions,
but prior filing he managed to bonus
his friends fifty eight Million.
And so we are told, the company will be back.
A shell of itself but not quite the same.
The shell is appropriate as we all know,
The core business of Ken is a shell game. | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
I'm going to work the rest of the day from home--I will be working, though (it's just not easy to work from the office today, as you can imagine). You can reach me by email and cell phone 415.505.6633. Hang in there buddy.
Best,
Jeff | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
I don't recall which one of you were working on this, but this is their redraft. Please review and respond accordingly.
Ed
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 12:46 PM
To: Sacks, Edward
Subject: FPL Group Capital Guaranty to Enron
Hello Mr. Sacks,
Attached is the guaranty incorporating all of the changes you requested,
please check it over to be sure it was done correctly, and let me know if
it is OK to execute.
Thanks,
Elaine Granger
561-625-7539
----- Forwarded by Elaine Granger/PGD/FPL on 10/26/2001 01:15 PM -----
"Karen Atkinson"
<Karen.Atkinson@steelh To: [email protected]
ector.com> cc: [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], "James Morgan"
10/26/2001 12:18 PM <[email protected]>
Subject: FPL Group Capital Guaranty to Enron
Elaine,
I am attaching clean and blackline versions of the Fourth Amended and
Restated Guaranty from FPL Group Capital to Enron entities, incorporating
the changes requested by Enron. Please confirm that you are comfortable
with the modification in paragraph 2 of assuming responsibility that Enron
actually receives your notice in the event that you desire to terminate the
Guaranty. As always, please do not hesitate to call with any questions.
-Karen
(See attached file: MIA2001_52695_2.WPD)
(See attached file: MIA2001_58850_1.WPD) | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]@ENRON [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 30, 2001 11:18 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: AUCTION OF FTS CAPACITY
COLUMBIA GAS TRANSMISSION CORPORATION
NOTICE TO ALL INTERESTED PARTIES
MAY 30, 2001
Notice ID: 2765
5 - NO RESPONSE REQUIRED
SUBJECT: AUCTION OF FTS CAPACITY
Columbia Gas Transmission has posted the following offers of FTS capacity.
Additional details of this capacity may be found in the Columbia Internet
NAVIGATOR system under the Capacity Release Folder, Offers, Offers Summary,
Offer Type, Capacity Auctions, under the following offer numbers:
Offer Rate Receipt
No. Schedule Point Delivery Point
32569 FTS Direct App Market Area 5
32570 FTS Leach Market Area 5
32567 FTS Milford Market Area 21
32572 FTS Leach Market Area 35
32582 FTS Delmont Market Area 36
32545 FTS Leach Market Area 1
32546 FTS Leach Market Area 5
32547 FTS Leach Market Area 5
32548 FTS Crossroads Market Area 5
32549 FTS Leach Market Area 7
32550 FTS Leach Market Area 8
32551 FTS Crossroads Market Area 8
32552 FTS Leach Market Area 8
32553 FTS Leach Market Area 9
32554 FTS Crossroads Market Area 9
32555 FTS Leach Market Area 10
32556 FTS Leach Market Area 12
32557 FTS Leach Market Area 15
32558 FTS Leach Market Area 15
32559 FTS Leach Market Area 19
32560 FTS A04 Alexander Market Area 32
Agg.
32561 FTS A05 Delmont Market Area 35
Agg.
32562 FTS Leach Market Area 5
32563 FTS Leach Market Area 8
32564 FTS Leach Market Area 9
32565 FTS Leach Market Area 12
32566 FTS Leach Market Area 15
For additional information, please contact your Account Representative or your
Customer Services Team. | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
NBC Nightly News will feature a portion of Howard University's 133rd
Commencement Convocation (along with those at other national universities)
on its Friday, June 8, broadcast (6:30 p.m. EDT). | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
To Everyone,
The following are revisions to the final report for April 2001. I am
providing details here, and the updated report is also attached.
Tom Brown Resources Ltd., CP ID 96309 is the result of an amalgamation with
Stellarton Energy Corporation, CP ID 64040. Stellarton Energy Corporation
will be inactivated on 05/01/01. Have Certificate of Amalgamation and
Articles of Amalgamation in hand.
Please also note that the Western Area Power Administration-"Upper Great
Plain" record, CP ID 81177, will be corrected to read "Western Area Power
Administration-"Upper Great Plains Region". The record that was overlayed
per the report, CP ID 35194, will be inactivated as a duplicate record.
These changes have been included on this revised report and the changes have
been made in GCP today. These are branch locations by geographic area of the
US Dept. of Energy, and there is no documentation for these changes.
I have also just received a name correction that may as well be included in
this report -
From Greer Comm. of Public Works, CP ID 36393, to Commission of Public
Works, City of Greer
Please call me with any questions or concerns.
Thanks,
Cheryl x33103 | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Paul,
CRC bid in replacement reserves for today. This afternoon, Tim Clemmons
called Collin to say that CRC didnt have the energy for this transaction in
the event that they were exercised.
They wanted us to "shop around" for mw's to replace their schedule. I have
heard from Jeremy Morris that this has happened on at least one other
occasion.
I dont know the circumstances behind today's problem, however, it is
unaceptable that they leave us in this position. We were, indeed,
exercised and we had to purchase from LADWP for $225. Had LA not been
selling, we would have looked really bad to the ISO.
I am requesting that Heather transfer the profits for this exercised hour to
the ST W Hrly book. The profits would include both the "premium" and the
exercise price .
We need to talk about this counterparty again.
Thanks,
JMF | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Rosie, thanks........I would be more than happy to meet with him.. | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Gerald,
I just spoke with Tina Horn from the Cameron Parish. They received the letter voiding the original agreement. She said that since using it for potable water was the only use they had in mind, they won't be needing the ROA to the pipeline. (Actually, she told me that their engineer had told them that it would be possible to clean the pipeline to the point that it could be used for potable water.)
In light of this, could you please look into the procedures for abandoning the pipeline according to Louisiana law?
Thanks for your help,
Rakhi
x3-7871 | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Angela: I just received this email from Carol. Do you know about this?
It's the first I've seen (unless it's related to something that Mary is
working on). Would you please follow up? It's coming from A&K. Thanks.
Sara
Second message to follow
----- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 11/16/2000 11:15 AM -----
Carol St Clair
11/16/2000 11:06 AM
To: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Enron/Cerberus
Carol St. Clair
EB 3892
713-853-3989 (Phone)
713-646-3393 (Fax)
[email protected]
----- Forwarded by Carol St Clair/HOU/ECT on 11/16/00 11:04 AM -----
"Lowe, Deborah" <[email protected]>
11/15/00 11:02 AM
To: <[email protected]>, <[email protected]>, "Barbour,
David" <[email protected]>, <[email protected]>,
<[email protected]>, <[email protected]>,
<[email protected]>, <[email protected]>,
<[email protected]>, <[email protected]>, <[email protected]>,
<[email protected]>, <[email protected]>,
<[email protected]>, <[email protected]>,
<[email protected]>, <[email protected]>,
<[email protected]>, <[email protected]>, <[email protected]>,
<[email protected]>, "Lowe, Deborah" <[email protected]>, "McFarling,
Muriel" <[email protected]>, <[email protected]>,
"Popplewell, Tom" <[email protected]>, <[email protected]>,
"Sargent, Pat" <[email protected]>, "Sullivan, Danny"
<[email protected]>, <[email protected]>, <[email protected]>,
<[email protected]>, <[email protected]>,
<[email protected]>
cc:
Subject: Enron/Cerberus
People have had trouble opening the documents in last night's distribution.?
We have rerun the redlines and these are now attached in WordPerfect.? These
same documents will be forwarded in Word by separate email.? Please contact
Danny Sullivan at (214) 659-4645 with comments.? Thank you.
- Blank Bkgrd.gif
- RESULT OF COMPARISON DOC NUM 265261V5 TO DOC NUM 265261V6.wpd
- RESULT OF COMPARISON DOC NUM 265302V5 TO DOC NUM 265302V6.wpd
- RESULT OF COMPARISON DOC NUM 265523V4 TO DOC NUM 265523V5.wpd
- RESULT OF COMPARISON DOC NUM 265535V2 TO DOC NUM 265535V3.wpd
- RESULT OF COMPARISON DOC NUM 265539V5 TO DOC NUM 265539V6.wpd
- RESULT OF COMPARISON DOC NUM 265544V3 TO DOC NUM 265544V4.wpd
- RESULT OF COMPARISON DOC NUM 266489V2 TO DOC NUM 266489V3.wpd
- RESULT OF COMPARISON DOC NUM 266490V5 TO DOC NUM 266490V6.wpd
- RESULT OF COMPARISON DOC NUM 266518V2 TO DOC NUM 266518V3.wpd
- RESULT OF COMPARISON DOC NUM 268865V1 TO DOC NUM 268865V2.wpd | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Daren:
I have been informed that this meter has been disconnected. The 215 has a
nom of 74/day at this meter. The first day I have a -0- flow is 2/12/00.
Let me know if you have other information.
Thanks!
Charlotte | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Jim, see below re amendment to the privatization law. It reflects typically
ambiguous consensus language, but nonetheless clarifies the issue of state
interference with competition and the extent to which states may regulate
contractors (it may not look like it at first blush). I could explain the
probable intent behind para. a(3) and b(2). Anyway, this will probably
reappear on the CA radar screen at some point. Regards, Bob
---------------------- Forwarded by Robert Frank/NA/Enron on 10/25/2000 05:27
PM ---------------------------
From: Cynthia Sandherr on 10/10/2000 11:41 AM EDT
To: Thomas E White/HOU/EES@EES, Bill Votaw/HOU/EES@EES, John
Carr/HOU/EES@EES, Laren Dean Tarbet/HOU/EES@EES, Robert Frank/NA/Enron@Enron,
Vicki Sharp/HOU/EES@EES, Robert C Williams/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc: Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron, Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, Joe
Hillings/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Tom Briggs/NA/Enron@Enron, Chris
Long/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Stephen D Burns/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Allison
Navin/Corp/Enron@ENRON, [email protected], [email protected], Peggy
Mahoney/HOU/EES@EES, Hap Boyd/EWC/Enron@Enron
Subject: def authorization
Attached herewith is the filed Conference Report statutory and report
language for the Department of Defense Reauthorization. Today, at 5:00 p.m.
EST, The House Rules Committee will meet to formulate a rule on H.R. 4205,
The Floyd Spence National Defense Authorization Act for FY2001--Conference
Report . The plan is to then vote on both the Rule and the Conference Report
on the House floor tomorrow, October 11th. The Senate also plans
consideration this week, but they have not yet announced their exact date for
floor consideration (and they are still seeking resolution of the price cap
concerns which could result in a possible filibuster.)
The Conference statutory language and report language is a victory for Enron
Federal Solutions which had been threatened with House language which would
have required a sole source by the local franchise utility. The House
receded to the Senate language (translation: the Hefley language was
killed.) Further, the political compromise reached does not support state
franchise rights; nor does it challenge Federal sovereignty; nor does it
challenge bundling; but it does affirm the competitive rights for non-utility
bidders.
Given the resources employed by EEI and their member companies plus employed
by APPA, NRECA and NARUC, this is a major victory for EFS and the DOD. By
close of business today, we need to determine whether or not to proceed with
a possible floor Colloquy.
Congratulations to all involved with this successful team effort!
SEC. 2813. CONVEYANCE AUTHORITY REGARDING UTILITY SYSTEMS OF
MILITARY DEPARTMENTS.
(a) Selection of Conveyee.--Subsection (b) of section 2688 of title
10, United States Code, is amended--
(1) by inserting ``(1)'' before ``If more than one''; and
(2) by adding at the end the following new paragraphs:
``(2) Notwithstanding paragraph (1), the Secretary concerned may use
procedures other than competitive procedures, but only in accordance
with subsections (c) through (f) of section 2304 of this title, to
select the conveyee of a utility system (or part of a utility system)
under subsection (a).
``(3) With respect to the solicitation process used in connection
with the conveyance of a utility system (or part of a utility system)
under subsection (a), the Secretary concerned shall ensure that the
process is conducted in a manner consistent with the laws and
regulations of the State in which the utility system is located to the
extent necessary to ensure that all interested regulated and unregulated
utility companies and other interested entities receive an opportunity
to acquire and operate the utility system to be conveyed.''.
(b) Applicability of Regulatory Requirements.--Subsection (f) of such
section is amended--
(1) by inserting ``(1)'' before ``The Secretary''; and
(2) by adding at the end the following new paragraph:
``(2) The Secretary concerned shall require in any contract for the
conveyance of a utility system (or part of a utility system) under
subsection (a) that the conveyee manage and operate the utility system
in a manner consistent with applicable Federal and State regulations
pertaining to health, safety, fire, and environmental requirements.''.
Conveyance authority regarding utility systems of
military
departments (sec. 2813)
The House bill contained a provision (sec. 2813) that would amend
section 2688 of title 10, United States Code, to require the secretary
concerned to comply with the competition requirements of section 2304 of
title 10, United States Code, in the conveyance of utility system
infrastructure. The provision would also require that the secretary
concerned carry out a conveyance or award only if he determines that the
conveyance or award complies with State laws, regulations, rulings, and
policies governing the provision of utility systems.
The Senate amendment contained a provision (sec. 2813) that would
amend section 2688 of title 10, United States Code, to clarify that the
secretary concerned may use procedures other than competitive procedures
only under the circumstances specified in section 2304 (c) through (f)
of title 10, United States Code.
The House recedes with an amendment that would require the secretary
concerned to structure the solicitation process for the privatization of
utility systems on military installations in such a manner that would
allow, to the maximum extent possible, all interested regulated and
unregulated entities the opportunity to acquire and operate utility
systems on military installations regardless of franchise rights in the
area of the installation concerned. The amendment would also direct the
secretary concerned to require the conveyee or awardee of the utility
system to manage and operate the utility system consistent with federal
and state regulations pertaining to health safety, fire, and
environmental requirements. | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
FYI
-----Original Message-----
From: Harris, Stephanie J
Sent: Monday, September 24, 2001 3:49 PM
To: Derrick Jr., James
Subject: FW: Organization Changes
-----Original Message-----
From: Enron Announcements/Corp/Enron@ENRON [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Stan Horton- Chairman and CEO of Enron Global Services@ENRON
Sent: Monday, September 24, 2001 3:07 PM
To: All Enron Worldwide@ENRON
Subject: Organization Changes
Today, we are forming Enron Global Services (EGS) in order to more closely align our asset-based businesses.
This reorganization will allow EGS to focus our resources on opportunities that present the highest value to Enron. It will also accomplish the following: 1) enhanced synergies among our assets and personnel, 2) more effective prioritization of business opportunities, and 3) better management of Enron's asset-based businesses throughout the world.
Enron Global Services' energy asset portfolio includes the North American pipeline businesses of Enron Transportation Services (ETS), including Northern Border; the international pipeline, power and distribution operations of Enron Global Assets & Services (EGAS); Portland General Electric; EOTT Energy Corp; Enron Wind; Azurix and Wessex Water.
Reporting to me as the heads of their respective business units are:
? Jim Hughes, President & COO - EGS/International
? Danny McCarty, Managing Director & CCO - ETS
? Bill Cordes, President - Northern Border Partners
? Peggy Fowler, President & CEO - Portland General Electric
? John Garrison, President & CEO - Azurix
? Dana Gibbs, President & COO - EOTT Energy Corp
? Colin Skellett, CEO - Wessex Water
? Adam Umanoff, President & CEO - Enron Wind
With the creation of EGS, we hope to enhance the efficient utilization of our commercial support services. To accomplish this, EGS' staff and operational functions will be headed by:
? Rod Hayslett, Managing Director & CFO
? Rob Walls, Managing Director & General Counsel
? Phil Lowry, Managing Director, Pipeline Operations and Engineering & Construction
? Brian Stanley, President & CEO - EEOS
? Steve Hotte, Vice President & CIO
? John Ambler, Vice President, Communications & PR
? Gary Smith, Vice President, Human Resources
In addition, Rob Walls will continue to perform his role as Deputy General Counsel for Enron reporting to Jim Derrick.
Phil Lowry will be responsible for domestic pipeline operations, technical services and engineering & construction, as well as, international pipeline technical services and engineering & construction. Brian Stanley will be responsible for technical services and engineering & construction for international power and distribution facilities.
Below is an organization chart for Enron Global Services, which displays the changes described here. We are confident this new organization will focus our talent and capital appropriately. Please join me in supporting this management team as it strives to maximize Enron's return on its assets.
<Embedded Picture (Metafile)> | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Look at the last article .... any idea what the "rude awakening" might be?
----- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/NA/Enron on 10/22/2000 07:30 PM -----
Ann M Schmidt
10/20/2000 07:58 AM
To: Mark Palmer/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Karen Denne/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Meredith
Philipp/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron, Mary
Clark/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Laura Schwartz/Corp/Enron@Enron, Eric
Thode/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Elizabeth Linnell/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: Enron Mentions
Business/Financial Desk; Section C
Study Finds That Many Large Companies Pay No Taxes
By DAVID CAY JOHNSTON
?
10/20/2000
The New York Times
Page 2, Column 1
c. 2000 New York Times Company
Goodyear, Texaco, Colgate-Palmolive, MCI WorldCom and eight other large
corporations earned more than $12.2 billion in profits in 1996 through 1998,
but none of them ended up owing corporate income taxes over that period,
according to a study released yesterday. Indeed, as a group, the companies
received $535 million in credits or refunds, the report found.
The study of 250 large publicly traded companies showed that 24 owed no tax
or received credits against past or future tax obligations in 1998, up from
13 in 1997 and 16 in 1996. The study also found that 71 of the 250 companies
paid taxes at less than half the official 35 percent corporate rate during
the three-year period.
The study was conducted by the Institute on Taxation and Economic Policy, a
Washington research organization associated with Citizens for Tax Justice, a
nonprofit group supported in part by labor unions. The group argues that the
tax system favors the rich and politically connected.
Corporate profits overall soared 23.5 percent during the three-year period,
but corporate tax revenues grew just 7.7 percent, a disjunction that has
drawn intense interest from the Treasury Department and some members of
Congress who are concerned about the growing market for tax shelters and
their abuse.
In recent years, Congress has watered down the 1986 overhaul of the tax laws,
which lowered rates and eliminated most tax shelters, and was supposed to
simplify reporting. The recent changes have opened fresh opportunities for
corporations to cut their taxes, the study found.
''Corporate taxes are not rising along with profits because companies have
found all sorts of ways to get around the reforms in the 1986 tax act,'' said
Robert S. McIntyre, the director of Citizens for Tax Justice. ''Companies
also have gotten a lot of help from Congress, especially in gutting the
minimum tax rules.''
Mr. McIntyre said that he and T. D. Coo Nguyen, the co-author, spent more
than two years examining financial statements the companies sent to
shareholders.
All but 18 of the companies studied are on the Fortune 500 list, and the
others are in the Fortune 1000. He said companies were excluded if they lost
money or their tax disclosures ''were crafted so that you could not figure
them out.''
At least two companies objected to the study's methodology.
Keith Price, a spokesman for Goodyear, said the study did not appear to
consider an accounting rule affecting its sale of a pipeline subsidiary in
1998. It made no objection to the 1996 and 1997 figures.
Michael N. Ambler, Texaco's chief tax counsel, said that his company had tax
disputes with the Internal Revenue Service that were unresolved after more
than a decade. If those disputes are settled with a refund, he said, that can
easily distort the figures for any one year. He said that even the three-year
study period was too short to give an accurate picture.
Timothy McCormally of the Tax Executives Institute, which represents
officials at large companies, told Bloomberg News that the companies named in
the report did nothing wrong. ''There is nothing in the report that suggests
that any of this results from any illegal or improper activity,'' he said.
The study by the Washington institute showed that the corporate tax burden
was falling in many cases because of the growing use of stock options, which
are an expense for tax purposes but do not count against profits reported to
shareholders.
Recent annual reports filed by Microsoft and Cisco Systems indicate that they
paid no federal income taxes in 1999 because stock options exercised by
employees wiped out profits for tax purposes.
The study found that General Electric, I.B.M., Pfizer, Intel and
Bristol-Myers Squibb also sharply reduced their tax rates because of stock
options without having to show reduced earnings to shareholders.
The most significant factor in the easing corporate tax burden, Mr. McIntyre
said, can be traced to actions in Congress, which relaxed the corporate
minimum tax in 1993 when the Democrats were in control of both the House and
Senate, and again in 1997, after the Republicans had taken over. Congress
made it easier for corporations to spread tax breaks and profits over many
years, including reaching back to past years to get tax breaks that could not
be used at the time.
In at least one of the three years studied, 41 of the 250 large companies
studied paid no federal income tax. Those 41 companies reported $25.8 billion
in profits to shareholders in the years they paid no taxes. If they had been
obligated to pay the full 35 percent corporate rate, the tax bill would have
been $9 billion, but the companies received $3.2 billion in refunds.
In total dollars, General Electric was the biggest beneficiary of tax breaks,
the study said, saving $6.9 billion in three years. The company paid $2.1
billion in income taxes on $25.8 billion in profits, for a tax rate of 8.1
percent.
The highest tax rate for the three years was paid by Winn-Dixie Stores, which
paid an average of 35.7 percent of its 1996 through 1998 profits in federal
income taxes. It was one of two companies that paid more than the 35 percent
statutory rate because of multiyear tax rules. The other was Paccar.
Chart: ''Profits Without Pain'' In a study of 250 large and profitable
companies, these 17 paid the least in corporate taxes -- or got the biggest
refunds -- as a percentage of profits from 1996 to 1998. Goodyear 1996-98
PROFITS, IN MILLIONS: $657 TOTAL TAX REFUNDED OR PAID, 1996-98, IN MILLIONS:
-$ 65 EFFECTIVE TAX RATE: -9.9 Texaco 1996-98 PROFITS, IN MILLIONS: 3,447
TOTAL TAX REFUNDED OR PAID, 1996-98, IN MILLIONS: - 304 EFFECTIVE TAX RATE:
-8.8 Ryder 1996-98 PROFITS, IN MILLIONS: 489 TOTAL TAX REFUNDED OR PAID,
1996-98, IN MILLIONS: - 30 EFFECTIVE TAX RATE: -6.2 El Paso Energy 1996-98
PROFITS, IN MILLIONS: 818 TOTAL TAX REFUNDED OR PAID, 1996-98, IN MILLIONS: -
36 EFFECTIVE TAX RATE: -4.4 MedPartners 1996-98 PROFITS, IN MILLIONS: 184
TOTAL TAX REFUNDED OR PAID, 1996-98, IN MILLIONS: - 4 EFFECTIVE TAX RATE:
-2.1 Tenneco 1996-98 PROFITS, IN MILLIONS: 731 TOTAL TAX REFUNDED OR PAID,
1996-98, IN MILLIONS: - 14 EFFECTIVE TAX RATE: -1.9 Colgate-Palmolive 1996-98
PROFITS, IN MILLIONS: 777 TOTAL TAX REFUNDED OR PAID, 1996-98, IN MILLIONS: -
14 EFFECTIVE TAX RATE: -1.7 MCI WorldCom 1996-98 PROFITS, IN MILLIONS: 3,578
TOTAL TAX REFUNDED OR PAID, 1996-98, IN MILLIONS: - 61 EFFECTIVE TAX RATE:
-1.7 Corporate Express* 1996-98 PROFITS, IN MILLIONS: 214 TOTAL TAX REFUNDED
OR PAID, 1996-98, IN MILLIONS: - 4 EFFECTIVE TAX RATE: -1.6 WestPoint Stevens
1996-98 PROFITS, IN MILLIONS: 339 TOTAL TAX REFUNDED OR PAID, 1996-98, IN
MILLIONS: - 3 EFFECTIVE TAX RATE: -0.7 Kmart 1996-98 PROFITS, IN MILLIONS:
978 TOTAL TAX REFUNDED OR PAID, 1996-98, IN MILLIONS: - 2 EFFECTIVE TAX RATE:
-0.2 Enron 1996-98 PROFITS, IN MILLIONS: 816 TOTAL TAX REFUNDED OR PAID,
1996-98, IN MILLIONS: + 2 EFFECTIVE TAX RATE: +0.2 Transamerica 1996-98
PROFITS, IN MILLIONS: 2,199 TOTAL TAX REFUNDED OR PAID, 1996-98, IN MILLIONS:
+ 5 EFFECTIVE TAX RATE: +0.2 Suiza Foods 1996-98 PROFITS, IN MILLIONS: 295
TOTAL TAX REFUNDED OR PAID, 1996-98, IN MILLIONS: + 2 EFFECTIVE TAX RATE:
+0.8 Navistar 1996-98 PROFITS, IN MILLIONS: 742 TOTAL TAX REFUNDED OR PAID,
1996-98, IN MILLIONS: + 13 EFFECTIVE TAX RATE: +1.8 McKesson 1996-98 PROFITS,
IN MILLIONS: 473 TOTAL TAX REFUNDED OR PAID, 1996-98, IN MILLIONS: + 10
EFFECTIVE TAX RATE: +2.1 Pfizer 1996-98 PROFITS, IN MILLIONS: 3,367 TOTAL TAX
REFUNDED OR PAID, 1996-98, IN MILLIONS: + 104 EFFECTIVE TAX RATE: +3.1
*Purchased by Buhrmann in October 1999. (Source: Institute on Taxation and
Economic Policy)
Copyright , 2000 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Business; Financial Desk
Legal Breaks Lower Some Corporate Tax Rates
?
10/20/2000
Los Angeles Times
Home Edition
Page C-3
Copyright 2000 / The Times Mirror Company
WASHINGTON -- Dozens of America's most profitable companies enjoyed tax-free
years during the 1990s largely because of legal tax breaks, an independent
study released Thursday found.
The report by the nonprofit Institute on Taxation and Economic Policy found
that 250 companies paid an effective tax rate of 20.1% in 1998, down from
22.9% just two years before. The federal income tax rate for corporations is
supposed to be 35%.
Of the 250 companies studied, 41 enjoyed at least one year of no income taxes
or an actual rebate from the federal government, despite pretax profits of
$25.8 billion from 1996 to 1998.
If all 250 companies had paid the full 35% on $735 billion in pretax profits,
the study estimated the total income tax would have come to $257 billion. But
tax breaks put into law by Congress lowered those companies' tax bills by $98
billion over the three-year period.
Companies getting tax rebates in 1998 alone included Texaco Inc., Chevron
Corp., PepsiCo Inc., J.P. Morgan & Co., Enron Corp. and General Motors Corp.,
the report found.
The study's chief author, Robert S. McIntyre, said companies lower their
taxes through such breaks as depreciation write-offs, tax credits for
research and development and deductions they take when employees exercise
stock options.
The report also found that the petroleum industry paid the lowest tax rate
from 1996 to 1998, at 12.3%, followed by electronics at 13.1%, forest and
paper products at 13.9% and transportation at 14%. At the other end of the
spectrum, publishing and printing companies paid 31.6%, gas and electric
utilities paid 28.1% and retail and wholesale trade companies paid 27.6%.
Copyright , 2000 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Oct. 19, 2000, 10:23PM
Houston Chronicle
Arena boosters tout 3 benefits
Some question property/sales tax numbers, new development
By ERIC BERGER
Copyright 2000 Houston Chronicle
Enron Field sparked the redevelopment of downtown's east side, boosters say,
and an arena would crown the revitalization of the long-neglected area.
A strongly pro-arena business organization, Central Houston Inc., released a
flurry of positive economic numbers to back its contention that Enron Field
is a boon to downtown as well as to city, county and school tax coffers, and
that the arena would be as well.
"There's no better way to measure the impact of sports facilities on downtown
than to look at the one we already have," said the organization's president,
Bob Eury, as he crooked a finger toward the ballpark.
Eury and other boosters outlined three economic benefits to Houston they say
are related to sports facilities: increased property tax revenues, a wealth
of new development in the area and a boost in sales tax collected.
But economic analysts questioned some of their conclusions.
When Enron Field was built, nine blocks were taken off the tax rolls at a
cost of about $284,000 in lost property taxes.
Eury said, though, that it was not a bad trade.
He noted that properties around the ballpark have leaped in value since the
Enron Field project began in the mid-1990s. In turn, the annual property tax
collected on land and buildings within four blocks of the ballpark is $2.4
million greater now than in 1995.
But Harris County Tax Assessor-Collector Paul Bettencourt said those figures
are due in part to the boom in land values across downtown, including the
central business district, since 1995.
Bettencourt said he hoped to have an analysis finished today to determine
whether land values around Enron Field had increased at a greater rate than
land in the rest of downtown.
The boosters also highlighted more than $700 million worth of private
developments planned -- but not yet completed -- near the ballpark, including
the $90 million, 37-story Ballpark Place Tower across Crawford Street from
Enron Field.
"Without a doubt, if Enron Field was not there, Ballpark Place would not be
there," said John Holland, an executive vice president for the Trammel Crow
Co., which expects to break ground on the project in early 2001.
Because the arena would be built in an urban core, even academics who are
skeptical about the economic benefits of sports stadiums agreed that spin-off
development is likely nearby.
But independent economists who have studied such issues, including Brad
Humphreys, an assistant professor at the University of Maryland-Baltimore
County, say development near a stadium usually has a negative impact on
development and businesses in other parts of a city.
The focus must be on the entire market, Humphreys said, not just in the
vicinity of a sports facility.
"Public subsidization of stadiums and arenas isn't necessarily a bad thing,"
he said. "But when they sell them as economic engines, it's just absolutely
wrong. The research doesn't show that."
A recent study Humphreys co-authored, which appeared in the fall 1999 issue
of the Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, found that the presence of
professional sports teams in a market, on average, actually reduced the
per-capita income in those markets, compared with similar markets without
such teams.
Given Houston's strong economy, Eury said he does not believe downtown
development will detract from other areas of the city, as Humphreys' studies
have shown in other markets.
A third major economic benefit offered Thursday was that a new arena, with
the Houston Rockets and Houston Comets as tenants, would generate $13 million
a year in sales tax revenues.
About $2.7 million of that would go into local coffers, with the remainder
going to the state, according to the study performed for Eury's group by CSL
International, a consulting firm.
Yet even in the absence of a new arena and both teams, many economists say a
large portion of those expenditures would be spent in the area anyway. That
is known as a "substitution effect."
Instead of a family going to a game, it might go to the movies or local zoo.
And corporations are likely to sponsor other local events out of their
advertising budgets, the economists say.
The CSL study did not account for this substitution effect in calculating the
sales tax impact, said Bill Rhoda, the firm's director.
Study: Dozens of corporations pay little or no income tax
By CURT ANDERSON
AP Tax Writer
10/19/2000
Associated Press Newswires
Copyright 2000. The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved.
WASHINGTON (AP) - Dozens of America's most profitable companies enjoyed
tax-free years during the 1990s largely because of legal tax breaks, an
independent study released Thursday found.
The report by the nonprofit Institute on Taxation and Economic Policy found
that 250 companies paid an effective tax rate of 20.1 percent in 1998, down
from 22.9 percent just two years before. The federal income tax rate for
corporations is supposed to be 35 percent.
Of the 250 companies studied, 41 enjoyed at least one year of no income taxes
or an actual rebate from the federal government, despite pretax profits of
$25.8 billion from 1996-98.
If all 250 companies had paid the full 35 percent on $735 billion in pretax
profits, the study estimated the total income tax would have come to $257
billion. But tax breaks put into law by Congress lowered those companies' tax
bills by $98 billion over the three-year period.
Companies getting tax rebates in 1998 alone included Texaco, Chevron,
Pepsico, J.P. Morgan, Enron and General Motors, the report found.
The study's chief author, Robert S. McIntyre, said companies lower their
taxes through such breaks as depreciation write-offs, tax credits for
research and development and deductions they take when employees exercise
stock options.
"We hope our findings will encourage lawmakers to re-examine this important
area of taxation," McIntyre said.
The report also found that the petroleum industry paid the lowest tax rate
from 1996-98, at 12.3 percent, followed by electronics at 13.1 percent,
forest and paper products at 13.9 percent and transportation at 14 percent.
At the other end of the spectrum, publishing and printing companies paid 31.6
percent, gas and electric utilities paid 28.1 percent and retail and
wholesale trade companies paid 27.6 percent.
"Anyone who worries about our economy's long-term growth has to wonder why
the tax code is being used to favor some industries and some kinds of
investments over others, rather than letting market forces decide," McIntyre
said.
----
On the Net:
Institute on Taxation and Economic Policy site: http://www.itepnet.org
Copyright , 2000 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
US Rep Drafts Bill To Impose Windfall Tax On Pwr Companies.
By JASON LEOPOLD
10/19/2000
Dow Jones Energy Service
(Copyright (c) 2000, Dow Jones & Company, Inc.)
OF DOW JONES NEWSWIRES
LOS ANGELES -(Dow Jones)- California's summer of soaring wholesale
electricity prices helped boost the stock price of many energy companies in
the third quarter.
But if U.S. Rep. Bob Filner, D-Calif., gets his way, those companies will be
forced to pay back hundreds of millions of dollars in profit to utilities,
customers and the government.
Filner introduced a bill in the House of Representatives last week that would
impose a windfall profit tax on wholesale power sold throughout the western
U.S.
The bill, which was referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means, may be
discussed in December or January, according to Filner, and if he gets enough
support by the mostly Republican caucus, companies like Enron Corp. (ENE),
Duke Energy North America (DUK), Southern Co. (SO). Reliant Energy (REI) and
Dynegy (DYN), would only be allowed to show a certain amount of profit and
anything over that amount would be taxed 100%.
Filner said the amount of profit hasn't been determined but his bill calls
for a baseline that would be a "just and reasonable" amount of profit.
The congressman's San Diego constituents were paying market-based electricity
rates in the summer which resulted in triple-digit utility bills. He said
generators are gouging California customers and need to be held responsible.
"This is not just a problem of supply and demand," Filner told Dow Jones
Newswires. "This is stealing. And we want our money back."
State and federal regulators are conducting separate investigations into
California's wholesale power crisis. The findings, expected to be complete in
about two weeks, are aimed at determining if generators or other key players
manipulated the state's wholesale energy market.
At least two major energy companies are being investigated by California
Attorney General Bill Lockyer. A high level source working on the probe with
the Attorney General said third-quarter earnings statements will play a major
role in finding out if generators manipulated the market.
Their investigation isn't turning up much evidence but earnings statements
are showing that profits are up significantly largely due to wholesale prices
in California, the source said.
At least one Federal Energy Regulatory Commissioner, who spoke on the
condition of anonymity, said the wholesale electricity market in California
will be in for a "rude awakening" when the agency completes its
investigation.
"There will be some serious structural changes to the market," the
commissioner said.
Representatives from energy companies told Dow Jones Newswires that higher
profits weren't the result of illegal activity or manipulating the market.
Energy Cos. Say Summer Crisis Boosted 3Q Earnings
On Wednesday, Duke Energy, which owns and operates power plants in
California, said in an earnings statement that third-quarter profit rose 74%,
due in part, to high wholesale prices in California in the summer. Enron and
several other companies reported similar third-quarter increases based on
California's summer of skyrocketing power prices.
The congressman doesn't want to limit the proposed windfall tax to
California, but where generators sell power in the western U.S.
But even Filner admits that forcing generators to refund part of their
profits isn't getting the early support it needs to become law.
"If the democrats were in charge I'd have this bill voted on already," Filner
said.
Filner said if the bill is passed some of the money would be refunded to
consumers and utilities, the victims, as he refers to them.
Meanwhile, he's also working on getting the House to pass a separate bill to
roll back electricity rates in the western U.S. to pre-deregulation levels
and he's trying to gather support for a wind power initiative.
Regardless of the outcome, the congressman is dead set on making noise.
"If nothing happens, I'm thinking about holding a press conference with the
San Diego District Attorney," he said. "We'll press criminal charges against
the energy companies." -By Jason Leopold; Dow Jones Newswires; 323-658-3874;
[email protected]
Copyright , 2000 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved. | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
The eThink Team
Do you know what's included in Enron's Code of Ethics? Do you know what
policies affect corporate conduct? Ask Sharon Butcher, Assistant General
Counsel of Corporate Legal, all your questions about our corporate policies
today (June 5) on eSpeak at 10 a.m. Houston time.
Can't make the live event? No worries. Go to eSpeak (
http://ethink.enron.com/eSpeak/exec/default.asp) now and submit your
question. Sharon will try to answer it during her event and you can read the
transcript later.
Stop what you're doing! Go to the Thinkbank (
http://nahou-lnapp01.corp.enron.com/eThink/Thinkbank.nsf/HomePage?OpenPage)
now! Notice anything different? | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
_________________________________________________________________
WEEKEND SYSTEMS AVAILABILITY
FOR
1/25/2002 5:00:00 PM through 1/28/2002 12:00:00 AM
_________________________________________________________________
Impact: San Palo
Time: Thur 1/24/2002 12:00:00 PM CT thru Sun 1/27/2002 12:00:00 PM CT
Thur 1/24/2002 10:00:00 AM PT thru Sun 1/27/2002 10:00:00 AM PT
Thur 1/24/2002 6:00:00 PM London thru Sun 1/27/2002 6:00:00 PM London
Outage: New server room
Environments Impacted: File Server, Notes servers, Print Server, Internet access.
Purpose: Put 02 servers room in just 01 room. Rebuild all cabling (data and voice). This is set on CST.
Backout: Back to original room.
Contact(s): Nilson Busto 55-11-5503-1347
Impact: Corp
Time: Fri 1/25/2002 1:45:00 PM CT thru Fri 1/25/2002 2:45:00 PM CT
Fri 1/25/2002 11:45:00 AM PT thru Fri 1/25/2002 12:45:00 PM PT
Fri 1/25/2002 7:45:00 PM London thru Fri 1/25/2002 8:45:00 PM London
Outage: Change Management Emergency Outage
Environments Impacted: Change Management System Outage.
Purpose: Change Management Application needs emergency maintenance.
Backout: NA
Contact(s): Brennan, Ryan 713-853-4545
Ray, Edward 7138536744
Brooks, Sean L 713-345-8077 | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Gerald,
Take a look at this and let's discuss. They are ready to sign this copy if
we are ok with it.
Chris
----- Forwarded by Chris Hilgert/HOU/ECT on 12/14/2000 10:06 AM -----
Robert Kilmer@ENRON
12/14/2000 10:04 AM
To: Chris Hilgert/HOU/ECT@ect
cc:
Subject: FGT/ec
---------------------- Forwarded by Robert Kilmer/FGT/Enron on 12/14/2000
10:05 AM ---------------------------
From: Janet Cones 12/14/2000 09:46 AM
To: Robert Kilmer/FGT/Enron@ENRON
cc:
Subject: FGT/ec | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
At the request of Mark Greenberg, I am forwarding to you the proposed
Non-Disclosure Agreement between Pricewaterhouse (for CreditDimensions) and
Enron Credit Limited. Mark Greenberg has spoken to the counterparty and made
a few changes to Pricewaterhouse's form. If you have any questions about the
transaction, the business person on the deal is Kim Detiveaux here in
Houston. Otherwise, we would appreciate your assistance in getting Richard
Sage in London to execute this agreement. | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Please note counterparty name change:
Old Name: Endesa Trading SA
New Name: Endesa Trading SA Sociedad Unipersonal
CPID: 84580
Joe | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Your request to cancel your membership has been received. Although the 1/15/02 payroll has already been run, you will recieve a reimbursement on your 1/31/02 paycheck for any membership dues deducted on your 1/15/02 paycheck.
In Health - The Body Shop | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
I have been at Enron for eight months and work under Sally Beck.
In December I attended the Exotic Energy Derivatives conference, where I met
Masayuki Fujita from the Mitsubishi Research Institute. He is doing research
on the deregulation of the Japanese power market. We had lunch together and
chatted for some time about his work (I worked in a Japanese company for 8
1/2 years and speak fluent Japanese, so we got along easily).
He was in Houston this week and came by to visit. On Monday, we met with
Vince Kaminski and Grant Masson and later had dinner with them. Sally
suggested that I introduce him to Alan Aronowitz and you. Of course, you
were out of town, but we did meet with Alan who said you would probably want
to meet him back in Tokyo anyway.
Would you like for me to set something up?
Regards,
Eugenio | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Kim,
Per Jan Moore's phone conversation this morning requesting the TW Capital IT project expenses for 2000 to Current:
The RMS work orders show a total of $105,622 actually billed to TW. The budgeted amount was $690,510. The work orders never were allocated with the actual costs, so majority of the actual costs are still showing up on NNG's books.
The Market Intelligence work order shows a total of $36,949 actually billed to TW. Let me know if we need to discuss this further.
Thanks,
Mark Ferguson
Enron Transportation Services
IT Manager
(713) 853-3186 | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Willis is an Manager candidate | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Mr. Skilling,
I am the Director of Government Affairs at Cisco and work for John Chambers
on broadband issues. John is currently one of 8 CEOs on a broadband task
force at TechNet that will drive our broadband policy agenda in the US.
TechNet (http://www.technet.org) is a 250+ tech CEO-driven policy/political
group.
We are interested in meeting with the someone in your Broadband Services
Group to discuss some of our ideas regarding a business and policy
strategy, and hoping you could direct us to the appropriate person(s).
Many thanks and regards from John.
Laura Ipsen
Director
Worldwide Government Affairs
Cisco Systems, Inc.
T:(408) 526-6650
F:(408) 853-1598
Visit <http://www.cisco.com/gov>Cisco Government Affairs Online
Sign up for <http://www.cisco.com/gov/archive/eupdates/index.html>Cisco's
Government Affairs E-Update | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Terry:
Just wanted to let you know that our son, Charles Eugene, was born on July
12th. He is absolutely beautiful and well worth the long wait and all of the
time and effort that it took to have him. After a prolonged stay in the
hospital, we are both home now and doing really well. I'm on cloud nine and
I'm sure that all of this will hit me soon. Hope you are doing well. Take
care.
Carol St. Clair
EB 3892
713-853-3989 (Phone)
713-646-3393 (Fax)
[email protected] | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
NewPower to offer another pilot program to Houston employees
Free remote energy management solution helps you to manage rising energy bills.
NewPower is launching a revolutionary technology pilot to the first 500 people to sign up in the Houston area. The NewPower Connections Remote Energy Management Solution is a pilot program designed to give consumers control of their thermostat via the Internet. The program will allow thermostats to be adjusted from anywhere, with any Internet-enabled device, including computers, web-enabled cell phones, palm OS devices, or pocket PCs. Sears Home Central will install and service the Remote Energy Management Solution at no charge throughout the duration of the pilot program. For a typical household, the three-month pilot could result in up to 10 percent to 15 percent utility bill savings, based on personal usage and the size of your home.
Be among the first to participate absolutely free.
Enrollment with the NewPower Connections Remote Energy Management Solution pilot program starts May 14 and continues through the end of the month. For more information about this offer, visit NewPower's table located in the Plaza of the Enron Building near the down escalator from 11:00 a.m. to 2 p.m. during the week of May 14. To become a pilot participant you need only to be a homeowner in the Houston area and have Internet access. You do not even have to be a NewPower electricity customer to participate. For more information about NewPower Connections, send an e-mail to [email protected].
Disclaimers:
Any contract for goods or services that is entered into by an Enron employee with respect to the NewPower program shall be solely between NewPower and such employee. Enron assumes no obligation on behalf of NewPower and makes no representations, warranties, or guaranties with respect to NewPower, any goods or services offered or provided by NewPower. Home.Enron.com | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Bob,
Thank you for your reply. I know you are doubly busy with your being on the
road this week, just prior to a vacation. Your answer below is perfect!
Bob, you and your team have been very supportive of our efforts to assist EBS
with BMC, and you have done all that we could have asked! I wanted you to
know that we really appreciate your support (I especially do, as a "late
arrival" to this situation)! Thank you again for all of the help!
Jeff
Bob McAuliffe/ENRON@enronXgate
12/05/2000 06:56 PM
To: Jeff Youngflesh/NA/Enron@ENRON
cc: Randy Matson/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Bruce Smith/ENRON@enronXgate, Douglas
Cummins/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jenny Rub/Corp/Enron@Enron
Subject: RE: Update
Jeff,
Assuming that either Randy or Doug were to decide that BMC was a viable
solution for their areas of responsibility, we would certainly support
purchasing the appropriate products from BMC.
Bob.
-----Original Message-----
From: Youngflesh, Jeff
Sent: Tuesday, December 05, 2000 5:34 PM
To: McAuliffe, Bob
Cc: Matson, Randy; Smith, Bruce; Cummins, Douglas
Subject: Update
Bob,
I understand from Thais that you're on the road for Enron, but soon you'll be
"on the road for Bob" - a well-deserved vacation coming up! In light of your
impending vacation, I wanted to do a quick follow-up check.
If we could somehow, without causing an undesirable state in your
organization, facilitate the ability to purchase BMC solution product for Net
Works, would you support that?
I have spoken with Bruce Smith, Randy Matson, and Doug Cummins in followup
calls from the November 17th meeting in EB 22C1. IF Randy and Doug were
likely to make a pro-BMC decision (instead of for a competitor's product),
and IF there was a way to painlessly (for Net Works) enable the funds to
become available to make a purchase of BMC product (by Net Works), would that
be something you would support? I am searching for a way to help EBS without
impacting Net Works in any negative way...but ultimately, I will abide
whatever you demand here.
I hope to hear from you, either by telephone/voicemail, or e-mail; if you
could do so prior to your vacation.
Thank you again for your help,
Jeff Youngflesh
Jeff Youngflesh
Director, Business Development
Global Strategic Sourcing
Enron Corp.
333 Clay Street, 11th Floor
Houston, TX 77002
t: 713-345-5968
f: 713-646-2450
c: 713-410-6716 | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
---------------------- Forwarded by Errol McLaughlin/Corp/Enron on 03/15/2001
06:39 PM ---------------------------
[email protected] on 03/15/2001 03:17:23 AM
To: [email protected]
cc:
Subject: 20% Off Everything Extended Online!
[IMAGE]
[IMAGE] [IMAGE]
[IMAGE]
[IMAGE]
[IMAGE]
Click here to change or remove your subscription. | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
The following individuals have been slotted for interviews at Wharton:
Reception and First Rounds (Oct 28 & Oct 29)
Jayshree Desai (Interviewer)
Michele Marvin (Interviewer)
Evan Betzer (Interviewer)
Betsy Bassis (Interviewer)
Sarah Wessner (Interviewer)
Neville Ravji (Interviewer)
Paul LeBeau (Recruiter)
Second Rounds (Oct 30)
Kevin McGowan (Interviewer)
John Enerson (Interviewer)
Randy Peterson (Interviewer)
Chuck Ward (Interviewer)
Ranabir Dutt (Interviewer)
Paul LeBeau (Recruiter)
Please let me know ASAP if your schedule has changed and you can not participate. If you can not participate, we would need for you to find a replacement. If you have someone in mind that can fill your slot please let me know.
An event sheet will be forwarded shortly.
Thank you,
Paul LeBeau/Recruiter | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Kim:
Attached are my comments.
Sara Shackleton
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3801a
Houston, Texas 77002
713-853-5620 (phone)
713-646-3490 (fax)
[email protected]
Kimberly Hundl@ENRON
04/04/2001 10:43 AM
To: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Melissa Ann Murphy/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Allegheny sample confirmation draft
Hi Sara,
Ok, I think I have properly referenced the side letter in this confirmation.
Please let me know what changes should be made.
P.S. I am leaving at noon today, so if I haven't heard from you by then, I
will give you a call tomorrow morning.
Thanks!
Kim x31647 | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Matt Motley
I am missing the following deals per Prebon for Matt
Enron buys from Merrill Lynch 25 mw of Q2 PV at $295.00
Enron buys from Calpine 25 mw of Q3 PV at $415.00
Enron sells to Reliant 25 mw of Q3 PV at $425.00 | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Dale,
Omer Muften (with the structuring group) asked us to help in evaluating the
different options embedded in the Storm contract. However, he promised to
provide us with the forward curves regarding the dark fiber (in Europe). We
are still waiting to receive those. In addition, it seems that the deal
structure has "just" changed. I will give you a call to discuss.
-Samer
Stinson Gibner@ECT
06/01/00 04:33 PM
To: Samer Takriti/Enron Communications@Enron Communications
cc: Cantekin Dincerler/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dale Surbey/LON/ECT@ECT, Vince J
Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Storm
Samer:
Can you please contact Dale Surbey in London and let him know what you and
Cantekin doing for the Storm transaction.
He can be reached by London tie line by dialing 830 3 6726.
Thanks,
Stinson
Dale:
I will be on travel for the next 2 weeks. Samer should be able to help
you. His extension is 34791. | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Attached is a revised Credit Watch listing for the week of 11/19/01. The Yuma Companies (Inc.) has been added to this week's "Call Credit" column.
If there are any personnel in your group that were not included in this distribution, please insure that they receive a copy of this report.
To add additional people to this distribution, or if this report has been sent to you in error, please contact Veronica Espinoza at x6-6002.
For other questions, please contact Jason R. Williams at x5-3923, Veronica Espinoza at x6-6002 or Darren Vanek at x3-1436. | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Dear Eric,
If you have last minute shopping to do, Omaha Steaks can still get
your gift there in time for Christmas! But hurry, you must order by
9 a.m. (CST) Saturday, December 22nd and select Overnight Delivery to
ensure your package arrives before Christmas Day!
Since you'll need to select Overnight Shipping to ensure Christmas
Delivery, we are also taking an additional $24.00 discount off the
price of each of these e-mail specials! If you don't need it there by
December 24th, you'll still save the extra $24.00! Simply select your
shipping service when completing your order.
So click on one of the links below or call us toll free at
800-960-8400 and take advantage of these e-mail exclusive specials.
The Gourmet Gift Package (4792AFB)
2 (5 oz.) Filet Mignons
2 (9 oz.) Boneless Strips
2 (6 oz.) Top Sirloins
2 (6 oz.) Filet of Prime Rib
Regular Price: $120.00
Sale Price: $93.99
Exclusive E-mail Price: $69.99. You Save $50.01!
http://offer.omahasteaks.com/cgi-bin4/flo?y=eNXw0BdpkJ0GRC0dIS0Al
The Ultimate Gift Ensemble (4796AFB)
4 (5 oz.) Bacon Wrapped Filet Mignons
4 (8 oz.) Top Sirloins
8 (5 oz.) Gourmet Burgers
Regular Price: $128.99
Sale Price: $93.99
Exclusive E-mail Price: $69.99. You Save $59.00!
http://offer.omahasteaks.com/cgi-bin4/flo?y=eNXw0BdpkJ0GRC0dIS0Al
Santa's Surprise (4797AFB)
6 (6 oz.) Bacon Wrapped Filet Mignons
8 (4 oz.) Omaha Steaks Burgers
Regular Price: $94.00
Sale Price: $83.99
Exclusive E-mail Price: $59.99. You Save $34.01!
http://offer.omahasteaks.com/cgi-bin4/flo?y=eNXw0BdpkJ0GRC0dIS0Al
And, to make your gift even more impressive, we'll add 6 quarter-pound
Omaha Steaks Burgers FREE to every shipping address in your order.
So make a lasting impression this year... send Omaha Steaks!
Happy Holidays,
Fred Simon, Owner
Omaha Steaks
1-800-960-8400
http://offer.omahasteaks.com/cgi-bin4/flo?y=eNXw0BdpkJ0GRC0dIS0Al
P.S. Take the guesswork out of mealtime with A La Zing's complete
meals! A La Zing features world-famous Omaha Steaks and right now you
can enjoy a FREE meal with your purchase of A La Zing's Filet Mignon
Feast! Click Below for details!
http://offer.omahasteaks.com/cgi-bin4/flo?y=eNXw0BdpkJ0GRC0OlR0Ay
OmahaSteaks.com sends special information and offers to individuals
who have requested them. You have received this message because you
are on OmahaSteaks.com's mailing list.
If you feel you save received this message in error or you wish to be
removed from the list, please go to
http://offer.omahasteaks.com/cgi-bin4/profile?y=eNXw0BdpkJ0GRCo
and you will automatically be removed from the list. Please allow 7
business days for completion of removal requests. | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
PeopleFinder <[email protected]> on 07/24/2000 07:07:29 PM
Please respond to [email protected]
To: [email protected]
cc:
Subject: PeopleFinder change confirmation #964480049.827
This is a change ticket from the PeopleFinder.
The PeopleFinder received these changes to your information
from the Change Request page on 7/24/2000:
(Kim Hillis submitted this change on your behalf with this comment: "I am
John's assistant and would like to have his profile information updated.
Please remove all other listings for him."
change Assistant to "cn=Kim Hillis, o=Enron; "
change Let someone else approve your changes to
"[email protected]"
change Preferred name to "John"
change Contract company to "Enron North America"
change Internet to "[email protected]; "
change Address to "0 1400 Smith Street EB3324; 1 Houston, TX 77002; "
change City to "Houston, Texas"
change Office to "Houston, Texas"
change Cellular to "713-417-3074; "
change Emergency to "713-853-0681"
change Extension to "37991"
change Fax to "713-646-3227; "
change Pager to "None"
change Responsibilities to "Managing Director of Risk Management and
Trading"
change Business card title to "Managing Director"
change Confirm external changes to "no"
change Usual hours to "7:30 - 5:00"
If you want these changes made to your information,
simply reply to this message. (Don't change the subject line.)
If you don't want these changes, throw this message away.
We're sorry, but cc:Mail is not supported at this time. If you
are reading this in cc:Mail, your reply will not reach the PeopleFinder.
Please set your Confirmation email preference on the Change page to
Internet until you have Lotus Notes installed on your PC. | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
All,
Further to your recent discussions surrounding the ENA Origination Track I will shortly be scheduling an interview date for you to interview recommended candidates. You have already received the attached list of suggested candidates and as I understand it you have no comments on these individuals thus far.
In order to match the success of the ENA Trading Track it requires your 100% commitment and participation in the following areas:
1. Interviewing
2. Training
3. Mentoring
4. Promotion of the Track
I will contact each supervisor of the attached list of candidates to gain further feedback on these candidates, prior to contacting them, and ensure their respective buy-in.
If you have any questions please call me.
I look forward to working with you on this Track.
Kind regards,
Karen Buckley
HR - x 54667 | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
<http://rs6.net/on.jsp?t=1010956583915.1010945480759&o=http://ccprod.roving.com/roving/images/p1x1.gif>
<http://www.mailbag.com/users/salarsen/epri_logo.gif>
<http://www.mailbag.com/users/salarsen/Dice.gif> Applied Valuation and Risk Management
March 20-22, 2002 - San Diego, CA
Evaluate Wholesale Derivative Energy Contracts, Generation Assets, and Retail Service Obligations
Experiment with the relationship between value and risk
in your portfolio, and the implications of price
volatility in power and fuel markets.
Click here for a complete workshop brochure. <http://www.mailbag.com/users/welsh/evr.htm>
What Past Participants Have Said This scenario-based training gives you hands-on experience solving problems in energy risk management and valuation of contracts and assets. Participants will work through problems that include:
Finding and using forward price curves
Estimating volatility
Embedded options: valuing and pricing complex contracts
Valuing "full requirements" obligations
Real options: valuing generating resources
Designing and testing hedging strategies
This course is designed for professionals who are responsible for risk management, power supply planning, fuel planning, retail services, energy trading/marketing, treasury, corporate finance and corporate strategy.
Registration Fee:
$995 for EPRI ARM Members, $1295 for other EPRI Members, and $1895 for non-EPRI Members. Registration is open until the workshop is filled.
Click here to register on line. <http://www.mailbag.com/users/welsh/evrreg4.htm>
Logistics:
The Radisson LaJolla
La Jolla, CA 92037
Phone: 858-453-5500
Room Rate: $129; $99 (Gov.)
Block Expires: 2/26/2002
For workshop detail, or to register, contact:
Cara Lee (Sam) Mahany Braithwait
1-888-332-8258
[email protected]
"Alternating theory with
hands-on investigations of
applications works great."
"Course spurred many ideas,
very good discussions - liked
the small size of the session."
"I liked how you demonstrated
how the different instruments
related to generation, retail
load, etc."
"Excellent examples and
discussions of hedges."
"I thought that the examples
were on target to what
actually occurs."
This email was sent to [email protected], at your request, by PowerMarketers.com <http://rs6.net/tn.jsp?t=l4qk8qn6.xbwxqqn6.9arrsqn6&p=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.PowerMarketers.com>.
Visit our Subscription Center to edit <http://ccprod.roving.com/roving/d.jsp?p=oo&m=1000838503237&[email protected]> your interests or unsubscribe <http://ccprod.roving.com/roving/d.jsp?p=oo&m=1000838503237&[email protected]>.
View our privacy policy <http://ccprod.roving.com/roving/CCPrivacyPolicy.jsp>.
Powered by
Constant Contact <http://www.constantcontact.com/index.jsp?cc=tccst> | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Enron employees may find the current circumstances stressful. We want to remind you that Enron's Employee Assistance Program (EAP) is still available and currently offering services to assist you and your family.
Group Discussions
Beginning this week, Enron's EAP provider, Innovative Resources Group, will be facilitating group discussions for employees who are interested in attending. These sessions are designed to address the challenges employees may be facing and to suggest ways to minimize the impact of stress on employees and their families. These sessions will be held on Wednesday, January 30 and Thursday, January 31 at the following times in EB32C2:
9:00 am -- 10:00 am
11:00 am -- 12:00 pm
1:30 pm -- 2:30 pm
3:30 pm -- 4:30 pm
No advance registration is necessary -- simply come to EB32C2 at the scheduled day and time that is most convenient for you.
Onsite Confidential Counseling / 24 Hour Hotline
EAP Counselors are available for individual, confidential appointments onsite in the Enron Building or at a variety of neighborhood locations. Counselors are also available via telephone 24 hours a day, seven days a week for Enron employees in all locations. The EAP counseling service is provided at no cost to employees and their family members. To schedule an appointment or speak with a counselor, please call the onsite office at 713-853-6057 or the 24-hour number at 1-800-345-1391.
Informational Brochures
Additional information about EAP programs will be available in the Body Shop, the Health Center on the third floor of Enron Center North and soon in the common kitchen areas on all floors of the Enron Buildings.
Websites
The following links may also provide helpful information:
www.stress.org -- This is the website of the American Institute of Stress. The site provides general information on stress management and links to other related sites.
www.wellnessjunction.com -- This website has been developed by Health Resources Publishing and provides targeted information on trends in wellness and health promotion. | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
This morning, the U.S. Supreme Court released its long-awaited decision in
Whitman (formerly, Browner) v. American Trucking Associations, the case
involving EPA's new rules setting standards for ozone and particulate matter
(PM). As you may recall, the U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, D.C. Circuit
had ruled that EPA exceeded its constitutionally-delegated authority from
Congress in crafting the new ozone/PM rules, and also ruled that explicit
cost considerations could not be used in standard setting. The Supreme
Court considered arguments on both the delegation and the cost question.
Industry petitioners had strongly argued that the federal government must
consider cost and not just health benefits in setting national air pollution
standards.
The Supreme Court's ruling held the following:
1) Reversed the Circuit Court's ruling on delegation, holding that the EPA's
ozone/PM rules did not represent an unconstitutional delegation of
legislative power.
2) Upheld the Circuit Court's ruling on cost considerations, holding that
the Clean Air Act "unambiguously bars cost considerations" from the process
of setting air-quality standards."
3) Remanded the ozone/PM rules to EPA, holding that EPA's implementation of
the rules was unlawful and EPA must develop a reasonable interpretation of
the ozone standards.
In general, industry is not very happy with the result -- they lost arguments
1) and 2). The remand in 3) will lead to some changes in the way the new
standards are applied (and give the Bush Administration the chance to make
some cosmetic changes), and may lead to some delays in implementation of the
rules, but the bottom line is, the new EPA ozone/PM standards will move
forward. Among other things, the new rules set an 8-hour standard for
determining attainment status for ozone and PM.
We are in the process of analyzing the court's ruling in more detail, and
will circulate further analysis shortly. Please contact me with any
questions.
PLEASE FORWARD TO OTHERS WHO MIGHT FIND THIS INFORMATION USEFUL
Thanks,
Jeffrey Keeler
Director, Environmental Strategies
Enron
Washington DC office - (202) 466-9157
Cell Phone (203) 464-1541 | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
LNG IV
25 and 26 February 2002, The Hatton, London
Dear Mr K.L. Lay,
I would like to apologise for an error in the last email you received today
for the LNG IV SMi conference, taking place in London in February. The
conference dates were announced for 18-19 Feb, when it should have read
25-26 Feb.
If you have any queries regarding this, please contact me.
Regards
Brid Scanlon
Marketing Executive
SMi Group
mailto:[email protected]
This information was not sent unsolicited. To unsubscribe to further
e-mails regarding SMi's forthcoming PFI/PPP reports and events please return
this e-mail with REMOVE in the subject header. You are registered as:
[email protected]
Your unique reference number is: 23003009 | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
---------------------- Forwarded by Phillip K Allen/HOU/ECT on 09/26/2000
12:07 PM ---------------------------
From: Cindy Cicchetti 09/26/2000 09:23 AM
To: Phillip K Allen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Hunter S Shively/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott
Mills/HOU/ECT@ECT, Allan Severude/HOU/ECT@ECT, Russ Severson/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Fletcher J Sturm/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott Neal/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Gas Physical/Financial Position
I have scheduled and entered on each of your calendars a meeting for the
above referenced topic. It will take place on Thursday, 9/28 from 3:00 -
4:00 in Room EB2537. | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
CHECK WITH LEGAL BEFORE QUOTING (EVEN NON-BINING) RESTRICTED REFERENCE
CREDITS.
Moazzam Khoja@ENRON
03/15/2000 03:04 PM
To: Ted Noble/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Rod Nelson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jean-Sebastien Fontaine/Corp/Enron@Enron
Subject: Mission Energy - Indicative Quotes
With reference to our meeting on Monday, we are showing you indicative quotes
on the three names on Mission Energy. Again, please understand that this is
digital payout structure so to compare it with the LC, you have to insert the
recovery assumptions.
Contellation Energy 107 Bps/ Annum
Dynegy 110 Bps/Annum
Reliant Energy 89 Bps/Annum
Let me know what do you thinnk about these prices
regards
Moazzam | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
As discussed please take a look at the agreement. Roy Ibasco will be
following up with you after you speak to Harry.
Please call me if you have any questions at 853-9199.
Regards,
Pushkar Shahi
---------------------- Forwarded by Pushkar Shahi/HOU/ECT on 04/13/2000 01:11
PM ---------------------------
"Siao, Vivian" <[email protected]> on 04/12/2000 04:35:08 PM
To: "'[email protected]'" <[email protected]>
cc:
Subject: Goldman, Sachs & Co.
The Goldman Sachs Client Access Agreement (the "Agreement") and/or Schedule
A -- Electronic Trading Services ("Schedule A") are attached for your review
and signature. The Agreement and Schedule A are required for each legal
entity whose trading personnel are enabled to access Goldman Sachs'
electronic trading systems. The documents must be signed by an authorized
signatory of the legal entity(ies) on whose behalf each enabled person is
authorized to trade. The list of persons within your organizaton that have
been enabled to access Goldman Sachs electronic trading systems and their
associated legal entity(ies) are listed below. If the Legal Entity name is
incorrect, please indicate the appropriate name for purposes of this
Agreement and Schedule A.
Enabled users Legal Entity
<<...>>
Please complete, date and sign both the Agreement and Schedule A separately.
Please pay special attention to the following points:
* At the top of the document -- "Client:" Fill in the legal name and
the address of the entity that will execute both the Agreement and Schedule
A. If the document is intended to cover more than one entity, please list in
a separate annex each entity that the document covers.
* Next to the line "Attn:" Fill in the name and title of the
authorized person that is signing the document on behalf of the legal
entity.
Please return the completed and signed documents via fax to:
GS contact: Vivian Siao
Fax: 212-428-1872
Phone: 212-902-1429
Any questions regarding the Agreement or Schedule A should be directed to
the GS contact listed above.
<<Client Access Agreement.pdf>> <<Schedule A E-Trading.pdf>>
Vivian Siao Stephan
Fixed Income, Currency & Commodities Compliance
Tel: (212) 902-1429
Fax: (212) 428-1872
- Client Access Agreement.pdf
- Schedule A E-Trading.pdf | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Hi Richard,
Lloyd Fleming introduced me to the key personnel on the trading and risk side
at MG today; I spent most of today discussing forward curves and option
volatilities with Tim Jones, Russell Plackett and Jon Barrett. I hope to be
able to get historical data from David Thompson to facilitate forward curve
analysis for our VaR models. Also discussed valuation issues (e.g. option on
calendar spread that they need a model for). Also was able to get a good
understanding of trading strategies and nuances of aluminum, copper and
nickel markets.
Regards,
Anjam
x35383
Richard Sage
04/07/2000 02:37
To: STOP: Mike Jordan/LON/ECT@ECT, Andrew Cornfield/LON/ECT@ECT, Naomi
Connell/LON/ECT@ECT, Stephen Wood/LON/ECT@ECT, Tim
Poullain-Patterson/LON/ECT@ECT, Andrea M Kerch/LON/ECT@ECT, Janine
Juggins/LON/ECT@ECT, Lloyd Fleming/LON/ECT@ECT, Tim Davies/LON/ECT@ECT, David
Hardy/LON/ECT@ECT, Barry Sangster/LON/ECT@ECT, Robert Campbell/LON/ECT@ECT,
Alex Holland/LON/ECT@ECT, Michael Heap/LON/ECT@ECT, Phil Redman/LON/ECT@ECT,
Fiona Grant/LON/ECT@ECT, Toby Knight/LON/ECT@ECT, Melissa Laing/LON/ECT@ECT,
Jeanie Slone/LON/ECT@ECT, Beth Apollo/LON/ECT@ECT, Mark
Pickering/LON/ECT@ECT, Suzanne Lane/LON/ECT@ECT, Stephen Evans/LON/ECT@ECT,
Niamh O'Regan/LON/ECT@ECT, Anjam Ahmad/LON/ECT@ECT, Fernley
Dyson/LON/ECT@ECT, Eric Gadd/LON/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: MG Integration Support - daily update #6
Deal entry
The need for 3 data-entry clerks becomes clearer when we understand that
between 200 and 2000 manual deal tickets are written each day which then have
to be keyed in.
Romulus
The trading assets of Rudolf Wolff in London and New York were bought after
close of play on Friday.
Included with the metals trading is a proprietary FX desk, and a softs desk,
trading coffee, cocoa, and sugar.
The softs people are expected to arrive in Enron House at the end of July.
EOL
Two metals trades have been executed on EOL. | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Jane, we would like to go the Adjustment of Status route.
Regards
Delainey | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Matt,
Attached is the file Phillip asked me to send you.
Andy | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
---------------------- Forwarded by Jeff Skilling/Corp/Enron on 03/06/2001
03:34 PM ---------------------------
Joe Gold@ECT
03/06/2001 04:25 PM
To: Jeff Skilling/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:
Subject: Your Voice Mail
Jeff,
Thanks for getting back to me. You probably saved us quite a bit of time and
money.
It looks like half of the City of London has been duped into helping E.ON
fool its shareholders. I wonder how many of their other sales were actually
auctions versus pre-arranged sales dressed up for the shareholders.
We will start our brainstorming sessions over again with a new rule - no
Germans!
Thanks again,
Joe | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
We cannot move the trades until we agree to the assignment, which we have not
done yet. We are resolving the trades being assigned, so don't move the
trades until you hear from me. Bob Bowen has been working on this on the
confirm desk side. | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
At the request of Rahil Jafry, I am attaching a copy of our proposed First
Amendent to License Agreement, which extends the term from February 28, 2001
to April 30, 2001. If the Amendment meets with your approval, please execute
it and return it to me via fax no. (713) 646-3490. If you have any questions
or comments please call me at (713) 853-3399 or Rahil at (713) 853-3206. We
look forward to hearing from you. | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Please start me a Fuel Cell notebook, beginning with the clean versions of
the documents listed below (don't need the redline). The binder needs to be
at least a 2 inch binder.
Thanks,
Kay
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 10/02/2000 11:31
AM ---------------------------
Dan Lyons@ECT
10/02/2000 11:28 AM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: Attached are clean and redlined versions of the documents we
discussed today. Please note that the
To hear is to obey
----- Forwarded by Dan Lyons/HOU/ECT on 10/02/2000 11:28 AM -----
"Jane Gobe" <[email protected]>
10/01/2000 08:05 PM
To: <[email protected]>, <[email protected]>
cc: "W. Cleland Dade" <[email protected]>, "Scott Miller"
<[email protected]>
Subject: Attached are clean and redlined versions of the documents we
discussed today. Please note that the
Attached are clean and redlined versions of the documents we discussed
today. Please note that the redlined versions were prepared in WordPerfect
and then converted to Word, so there may be some minor translation difficulty.
Please call if you have any questions.
- #1172822 v1 - SECURITIES PURCHASE.CLEAN.doc
- #1172812 v1 - STRATEGIC ALLIANCE.RED.rtf
- #1172815 v1 - SECURITIES PURCHASE.RED.doc
- #1172817 v1 - WARRANT.RED.doc
- #1172818 v1 - REG RIGHT.RED.doc
- #1172819 v1 - WARRANT.CLEAN.doc
- #1172821 v1 - REG RIGHTS.CLEAN.doc
- #1164859 v8 - STRATEGIC ALLIANCE AGREEMENT.doc | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
The replay number for the Investor Relations conference call this morning is:
719-457-0820
780214 (passcode) | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
John:
Please send the Guaranty attachment.
Carol St. Clair
EB 3892
713-853-3989 (Phone)
713-646-3393 (Fax)
[email protected]
"Shuttee, John" <[email protected]>
06/26/2000 03:32 PM
To: "'[email protected]'" <[email protected]>
cc:
Subject: RE: Enron ISDA Final Draft 6-23
Carol,
Enclosed is our adjusted guaranty that we had previously altered to meet
your requirements (sorry I didn't send this initially). Please see if this
is good for you.
John
PS: Where is "receipt" you discussed below? Page 1 of which document?
<<Enron Guarantee Format - 5-23.doc>>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] [SMTP:[email protected]]
> Sent: Monday, June 26, 2000 1:03 PM
> To: Shuttee, John
> Subject: Re: Enron ISDA Final Draft 6-23
>
>
> John:
> The Schedules look fine. Just one minor chnage which I can maker. In the
> form of LC, I'm deleting the words "Rider 1" at the bottm and in the last
> paragrpah of page 1, chnagung the word "receipts" to "receipt". We will
> generate and send to you execution sets. With respect to the Guaranty, we
> would prefer that you sue the fopm which I sent to you a few weeks ago.
> Here it is. This form is our updated form and matches up with the Enron
> Guaarnty that we are giving you.
> (See attached file: EL Guaranty 5-23 (Enron Form).doc)
>
> Carol St. Clair
> EB 3892
> 713-853-3989 (Phone)
> 713-646-3393 (Fax)
> [email protected]
>
>
>
>
> "Shuttee,
>
> John" To: "'Carol St Clair'"
> <[email protected]>
> <ShutteeJ@EPE cc: "Shuttee, John"
> <[email protected]>
> nergy.com> Subject: Enron ISDA Final
> Draft 6-23
>
>
> 06/26/2000
>
> 08:29 AM
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Carol -
>
> Enclosed are what I hope will be the final drafts of the Schedule,
> Paragraph
> 13, LC provisions, and Schedule 1.
>
> I have accepted and incorporated the new changes you made plus all the
> changes which we have agreed upon. I also changed the presentation of our
> address in Part 4a of the schedule - it's the same information presented
> in
> a more concise way. Finally, I changed the signature block on the
> schedule
> to eliminate EPME-Gas Company (it no longer exists) as a 'general partner"
> -
> I don't know where that came from.
>
> Also enclosed is our version of the Guarantee. Please let me know if any
> other changes are required. If not, let's proceed with execution copies -
> let me know if you want to generate them, or if you want me to.
>
> John
>
> <<Enron Schedule -Our Draft 6-23.doc>> <<Enron CSA - Our Draft
> 6-23.doc>>
> <<EP Guarantee Format - 6-23.doc>>
>
>
>
>
> ******************************************************************
> This email and any files transmitted with it from El Paso
> Energy Corporation are confidential and intended solely
> for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are
> addressed. If you have received this email in error
> please notify the sender.
> ******************************************************************
>
> (See attached file: Enron Schedule -Our Draft 6-23.doc)
> (See attached file: Enron CSA - Our Draft 6-23.doc)
> (See attached file: EP Guarantee Format - 6-23.doc)
> << File: EL Guaranty 5-23 (Enron Form).doc >> << File: Enron Schedule
> -Our Draft 6-23.doc >> << File: Enron CSA - Our Draft 6-23.doc >> <<
> File: EP Guarantee Format - 6-23.doc >>
- Enron Guarantee Format - 5-23.doc | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Hi Matt,
Carlos gave me a file folder with the Salmon filing docs. I need the corp
books with share certs, as we are selling the member interests and expect to
do so with share certificates. I need it by Friday if at all possible.
Thanks,
Kay | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Thanks a lot, I really appreciate it. Could you please check the confirm though?? I haven't received anything. My fax number is set forth below.
Limor
Enron Global Markets
520 Madison Avenue
New York, NY 10022
Tel: 212.715.5283
Fax: 212.715.5608
E-Mail: [email protected]
-----Original Message-----
From: Jones, Tana
Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 12:56 PM
To: Nissan, Limor
Subject: RE: Financial Trading Agreements
I faxed you the alcoa ISDA immediately after we spoke. It should be in NY right now.
-----Original Message-----
From: Nissan, Limor
Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 11:28 AM
To: Jones, Tana
Cc: Taylor, Mark E (Legal)
Subject: RE: Financial Trading Agreements
Importance: High
Tana,
The instructions don't work, and quite frankly, I don't have the luxury of waiting for an IT guy to help me. Is it possible for you to print out the Alcoa isda and fax it to me at the below fax number? I need it on an urgent priority basis. If you can't fax it to me, please let me know.
Thanks,
Limor
Enron Global Markets
520 Madison Avenue
New York, NY 10022
Tel: 212.715.5283
Fax: 212.715.5608
E-Mail: [email protected]
-----Original Message-----
From: Jones, Tana
Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 12:04 PM
To: Nissan, Limor
Cc: Taylor, Mark E (Legal)
Subject: FW: Financial Trading Agreements
Limor,
The instructions below should help you find the access to get into the Financial Trading Agreement Database (where the ISDA information is located). If you want to get into where the documents are actually stored online, you need to contact Moyez Lallani, and he can get you access to Livelink. Tell him you are in Legal in New York and you need access ASAP. Then just have your computer guy up there set up up an Icon.
-----Original Message-----
From: Neves, Michael
Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2001 1:50 PM
To: Jones, Tana
Subject: FW: Financial Trading Agreements
Put this in a safe place!
-----Original Message-----
From: Neves, Michael
Sent: Friday, July 13, 2001 10:06 AM
To: Jones, Tana
Subject: Financial Trading Agreements
Instructions:
From your Lotus Notes Workspace choose File - Database - Open. This will bring up the Open Database Dialog (shown below). In the Server drop down list, choose "ECTHOU_LN1/ECT". Once this is selected, find and double-click on the "Legal" folder. Next, in the Database list, find the "Financial Trading Agreements" database and double-click (or click Open). The database will then be added to your Lotus Notes Workspace.
<< OLE Object: PBrush >>
Regards,
Mike Neves
Enron Net Works
Corporate Systems Development
[email protected]
713-853-3363 | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
I've received some feedback from the Real Time group regarding these
counterparty discrepancies. Apparently, they were never given notice of the
correct counterparty names, and chose what seemed to be the most logical
name. Can we come up with a system or master list of usable counterparty
names for these guys to refer to when faced with an array of choices? (i.e.
There are five different names under Transalta.)
The concern lies with our daily correction report, which I generate and which
includes all deals that have been changed and the name of the person who made
the "error." This report can weigh unfairly against a trader who may be
unaware of the difference between "Dynegy Marketing & Trade" and "Dynegy
Power Marketing." I feel like there has to be a more efficient way to avoid
these errors than publishing them in a report that gets sent throughout the
company.
If you could help me compile this master list, or direct me to someone who
can, I would greatly appreciate it.
Thanks,
Kate
Rhonda L Denton
01/30/2001 09:14 AM
To: Joe Errigo/Corp/Enron@Enron, Geir Solberg/PDX/ECT@ECT, Juan
Hernandez/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Leaf Harasin/PDX/ECT@ECT, Ryan
Slinger/PDX/ECT@ECT, David V Porter/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
Subject: Incorrect Counterparties
I have changed the following deals b/c the selected CPs are incorrect. Also,
please remember not to pick CPs in brackets as they are inactive. Thank you
for your help.
507901 should be Allegheny Power, Transmission Business Unit
507842 should be Dynegy Power Marketing, Inc.
506767 should be NRG Power Marketing, Inc.
507900 should be PJM Interconnection LLC
506618 should beTransalta Energy Marketing (US) Inc.
506727 should beTransalta Energy Marketing (US) Inc.
506747 should beTransalta Energy Marketing (US) Inc. | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
On Sunday, the new Fortune magazine was a roadway for my two-year old's
cars. On Monday, my sixteen year-old used the cover to cut out pictures of
money for a school project. Last night, the magazine made it into my hands
around midnight when everything at home was settled in for the night. What a
nice article! I smiled while reading it. How nice to see your
accomplishments recognized in print. Congratulations. I hope that you have
plenty of copies for your mom and dad. --Sally | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
any luck on getting a copy? | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
don't know about the relationship with dave, you'll have to work on that one.
i will talk to stan, but i can't believe he has any interest in developing
power plants anywhere.
Portland General did just get a dash approved for building about 45 mw in
oregon. Stan Horton called me about it, and he was going to have someone in
Portland (i'll remember the name in a minute) call tim belden about our
fundamental analysis of the region.
Stan also mentioned the there is an unregulated side of PGE that is enterring
into these transactions. He wondered if that part of PGE should belong in
EWS. Talk to tim and we'll decide how to approach that next week.
From: John J Lavorato/ENRON@enronXgate on 06/05/2001 10:14 AM
To: Greg Whalley/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: FW: Enron Everywhere
Fun Fun Fun
-----Original Message-----
From: Calger, Christopher F.
Sent: Wednesday, May 30, 2001 11:20 AM
To: Lavorato, John
Subject: Enron Everywhere
John,
I hate to whine, but...
EES:
Duran and I talked with Delainey yesterday. It seems as though we are
setting up one centralized trading/risk function but we will have overlapping
origination functions. I am sure I can work with whatever arrangement you
make with Dave, but it seems as though we will be tripping over each other in
the market. Industrial coverage seems easy, but they want to call on IOU's
and Munis in order to buy customers. These are fundamentally large,
structured short positions that are very similar to what we have been and are
pitching.
Transport/Operations:
Eric Gadd came back from London and reports to Stan Horton. He heads up an
Asset Development group that is focusing on, among other things, power plant
development in the southwest. This sounds crazy - do you want to call Stan
or should I?
Portland General:
They are developing generation in Oregon that is competing with one of our
projects. No one in RAC has heard of this yet. Not a big deal, I will call
Peggy Fowler, but thought you should be aware.
Regards,
Chris | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Attached are presentations from the Enron Advisory Council meeting.
- 10th_April_Enron.ppt | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Here's a redraft of one letter, second to follow: | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Grant & Vince,
I have approved your request for RisktRAC (formerly GRMS) access. In about a
week, contact your IT help desk representative to verify the deployment onto
your desktop.
Thanks,
Rudi | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Jackie-
I cannot for the life of me remember why this sale deal is in there. I do
believe it is valid and is a part of the purchase deal with Tesoro. Jill
Zively was the dealmaker and could probably answer your question as could
George Weissman and Melissa Graves. You might also check with Anita, the
allocator, to see the support she gets for the allocation. This may give you
some clue as to what this volume represents. (Let me know, too, since I hate
forgetting things!!!!) | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Everyone,
As we stated earlier, this particular virus that is on the internet is causing a lot of issues for Corporations. As a result, the companies who write anti-virus software are continuously updating their software. As of this morning, another update has been made available to us. This update does a better job of protecting your PC than the update we received last night.
At this time, it is extremely important that you again go through one of the procedures listed below to get the latest update.
1. Logout of the network and log back in or
2. Click on START>PROGRAMS>ACCESSORIES>Norton AntiVirus Corporate Edition and then click the Live Update button. This will pop up a screen where you will have to click the "Next" button and then a "Finish" button. - If you are an EES user, this option is not available to you. Please use option 1.
The proper version of the update pattern you need is: (9/18/2001, version 30918BL) - You may need to restart the Norton Anti-Virus client if you want to visually insure that you have the latest update.
If you have questions or concerns, please direct them to your Resolution Center.
Enron Global Technology | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
The following items were discussed in this week's ETS and Corporate Change Control Item...
Oct. 21
From 10:00 a.m. - 2:00 p.m., the Unix team will perform maintenance and reboot app server emerald. The following applications will be affected: CAS, ERP/TRV, IZZIE, SIEBEL, WEBMODAL, Commodity Logic. No impact to ETS users is expected.
Oct. 27
From 4:00 - 8:00 p.m., Trizechan Properties has scheduled a shutdown of all electrical service at 3 Allen Center. Enron Network Services will power down the 3AC network infrastructure between 3:30-4:00. There will be no network access during the electrical maintenance and the outage will continue until ENS is able to power up all of the networking devices. If you need access to 3AC anytime that Saturday, you will need to contact Trizechan Properties beforehand with your security information. Anyone to attempts to enter the building on Saturday that is not on the list will be denied access.
ETS Solution Center - Houston, at 713-345-4745
ETS Solution Center - Omaha, at 402-398-7454 | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
---------------------- Forwarded by Judy Hernandez/HOU/ECT on 08/03/2000
12:21 PM ---------------------------
"SOCORRO HERNANDEZ" <[email protected]> on 08/02/2000 03:55:09 PM
To: <[email protected]>, <[email protected]>,
<[email protected]>, "A. SUE GONZALES-GUEVARA"
<[email protected]>, "Barbara Monte" <[email protected]>, "CATHERINE BROWN"
<[email protected]>, "ELIZABETH TRUJILLO" <[email protected]>, "HERBERT
NORMAN" <[email protected]>, "JESSICA VEGA" <[email protected]>, "KATHY MARIE
MOORE" <[email protected]>, "MARIA THOMPSON" <[email protected]>, "VIVIAN
FARRELL" <[email protected]>, <[email protected]>, <[email protected]>,
<[email protected]>, <[email protected]>
cc:
Subject: Virus Alert
> > > > >> > >> Subject: FW: HEALTH ALERT!!!!!
> > > > >> > >>
> > > > >> > >>
> > > > >> > >> > >Health Concern
> > > > >> > >> > >
> > > > >> > >> > >
> > > > >> > >> > >CNN REPORTS A NEW VIRUS HAS BEEN RECENTLY DISCOVERED. ONE
PERSON CAN PASS IT ON TO MILLIONS AS IT IS VERY CONTAGIOUS. THE CENTER FOR
DISEASE CONTROL HAS REPORTED THIS WEEK THAT THE VIRUS SPREADS VERY RAPIDLY
FROM ONE PERSON TO THE NEXT. THEY HAVE PUT A VERY INTERESTING NAME ON THIS
VIRUS.
> > > > >> > >> > >
> > > > >> > >> > >
> > > > >> > >> > >
> > > > >> > >> > >
> > > > >> > >> > >IT IS CALLED.......
> > > > >> > >> > >
> > > > >> > >> > >
> > > > >> > >> > >
> > > > >> > >> > >
> > > > >> > >> > >
> > > > >> > >> > >
> > > > >> > >> > >
> > > > >> > >> > >
> > > > >> > >> > >
> > > > >> > >> > >
> > > > >> > >> > >A SMILE
> > > > >> > >> > >
> > > > >> > >> > > @@@@
> > > > >> > >> > > @ _ _ @@
> > > > >> > >> > > @@ o o @@
> > > > >> >> > > @@@ @@?> > > > >> >> > > @@@ \__/ @@@?> > > > > > >>>>> ) (?> > > > >> > >> > >?> > > > >> > >> > >?> > > > >> > >> > >?> > > > >> > >> > >UH! OH! TOO LATE!! I SEE IT ON YOUR FACE ALREADY! You've ?got the virus!!!!?> > > > >> > >> > >?ALERT! You have just been snuggled by a person that cares 4 ya!??Send this to all your buddies to show that ya care.??> > > > >> > >> > >?> > > > >> > >> > >"I wish for you..."?> > > > >> > >> > >?> > > > >> > >> > >Comfort on difficult days,?> > > > >> > >> > >Smiles when sadness intrudes,?> > > > >> > >> > >Rainbows to follow the clouds,?> > > > >> > >> > >Laughter to kiss your lips,?> > > > >> > >> > >Sunsets to warm your heart,?> > > > >> > >> > >Gentle hugs when spirits sag,?> > > > >> > >> > >Friendships to brighten your being,?> > > > >> > >> > >Beauty for your eyes to see,?> > > > >> > >> > >Confidence for when you doubt,?> > > > >> > >> > >Faith so that you can believe,?> > > > >> > >> > >Courage to know yourself,?> > > > >> > >> > >Patience to accept the truth,?> > > > >> > >>?> > > > >> > >> Have a blessed day.?> > > > >> >?> > > > >> >?> > > > >>?> > > > >>?> > > >?> > >?>???? | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.