text
stringlengths 1
1.59M
| meta
dict |
|---|---|
Today's Pre-Bid Meeting will be held in 05075 from 3:00 PM to 5:00 PM
Patti: Please pass on to the schedulers. | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
i wasn't that drunk on saturday. i was just joking. i felt great on
saturday. like a champ. people get married younger than you? wow. what
the hell do they do if they get married that early? | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
I am going to have to take our system down on Thursday, November 8th to pack it. We may not have email for a couple of months, until we get a phone line and until I can get re-set up. Everyone's is in Denver, only and I don't know yet if I can access the new Denver area code from ours of 303 without it being long distance. I will email all of you when I have email up again.
Take care.
----- Original Message -----
From: Marvin Brasch
To: C Pfeiffer ; Dan & Kathy Euston ; David & Patty Drake ; Jayne & Rusty Saighman ; Nancy Morgan ; Tina & Steve Leavy ; Mark Brasch ; Tammie & Gary Pech
Sent: Tuesday, October 30, 2001 3:03 PM
Subject: We have an Address!!!
Our new address will be:
347 County Road 122
Elizabeth, CO 80107
Temporarily we will be using my cell phone (until we have a wall up to put the phone line into in the barn). My cell phone is: 281-701-5863
Take care. We are going on a new adventure and are excited. It's finally become a reality. | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
I believe the registration deadline for the Nov 7 election has passed. I'll
ask Eliz to forward the registration materials to you so you can be ready for
the next election. Also, if you were registered in Harris County before you
may still be on the rolls at your old precinct ... you should ask.
A G Gelotti@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
11/02/2000 12:36 AM
To: Steve Kean@ENRON
cc:
Subject: Re: Harris County - Early Voting Shuttle!!!!!
Steve,
My wife and I have been out of the country and have not registered to vote
nor do we have absentee ballots to vote. Any suggestions on how we can vote?
Sent by: Enron Announcements@ENRON
To: All Enron Houston
cc:
Subject: Harris County - Early Voting Shuttle!!!!!
Avoid the crunch on election day by voting early!
ENRON is providing employees with
complimentary shuttle service
from the Enron Building to the downtown early voting site!!
Thursday, November 2
and
Friday, November 3
1319 Texas Avenue @ Austin Street
7:00 am until 7:00 pm
(transportation by Beal's - pick-up on the West end of Andrews Street)
In order to vote early at this site,
you must be registered in Harris County
and present your drivers license for ID verification
(your voter registration card is not necessary)
Please take advantage of this opportunity and VOTE!!
For election-related questions, please reference this website:
www.co.harris.tx.us/cclerk/elect.htm | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Start Date: 3/7/01; HourAhead hour: 10; No ancillary schedules awarded. No
variances detected.
LOG MESSAGES:
PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001030710.txt
###Cannot locate a Preferred or Revised_Preferred Schedule that matches the
FINAL Individual Interchange Schedule. Unable to assign deal number. | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Luanne:
This looked fine. In the first paragraph please change the name from Enron
Risk Management Services Corp. to Enron North America Corp. I look forward
to receiving the paperwork from you and getting this wrapped up.
Carol | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Carlos,
Please, forward their resumes to us and we shall set up an interview for them.
Vince
carlos ordonez <[email protected]> on 11/21/2000 09:30:08 AM
To: [email protected]
cc: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Greetings
Dear Vincent and Stinson,
Both my students would love to come visit you guys for an informal
visit in the near future. Please let me know well ahead of time
when they can come. If possible, see to it that their parking expenses
be paid when they do come.
I'll be in touch with you all over the next months about this and
a possible postdoctoral/trainee agreement (World Lab.).
Cheers,
Carlos | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Dear brothers and sisters in Christ,
Please note Carla McGinley, an Ashford UMC member and friend of mine, is going on a Walk to Emmaus weekend retreat the middle of March, 2002. It will be held at the JbarJ Ranch in Sealy. In an effort to help her sponsor Kathy Eason and to encourage Carla we respectfully ask your assistance as well.
Some of you know Carla very well, others only slightly and some not at all; and yet you do know me. When I went on my own retreat to Emmaus in 1994 I was incrediably blessed then only to realize over the years since the blessing has continued. We don't always feel the warmest effects of an effort until God chooses it so. I have since served on many teams over the years and each time I am allowed to be present as a person gets time for her/himself I am blown away by the effects of honest heartfelt prayer in action. Now that Carla has taken the responsibility and position of coordinating the prayer ministry for our church home, Ashford UMC prayer is requested in her name.
Would you be so kind to either mail or email an encouraging note, bookmark or other thought to me FOR HER and addressed to her so that I can take the messages to leave for her on the walk. She will not know of these or receive them until she is on the weekend These messages will mean a lot reminding her of the vastness of her brothers and sisters in Christ in prayer; of God's love sent in many forms and will encourage her as she returns to serve the Lord in her famiily, church and the community. Having thoughts from some who know her and SOME WHO DO NOT will touch her I know. These notes will show her as an agape physical form the unconditional love that God has for us. Her walk will be March so please forward asap to ensure receipt. I will be participating as an outside 4th day along with her official sponsor Kathy for those of you that have already gone on the walk...join me/us if you l! ike.
Kathy Eason is her walk sponser. Prayer for Kathy in her support of Carla, the whole walk team, retreatants and their families as well will be the greatest agape (unconditional love gift). God bless each of you as you take the time to share ideas, a love in Christ thought, a card or a letter of encouragement for Carla as she spends this time away from the daily world and spends it in the Lord with others on her journey. Nothing brings the heart more encouragement like an unexpected love in Christ message from another person during this time away from the everyday world.
Feel free to ask others that know Carla to join in the messages and forward to me by early March for delivery mid month.
Please notes mail to me for her:
P.O. Box 441150 Houston, TX 77244-1150 (you may enclose a sealed note for her if you prefer)
or email as follows: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
All will be delivered to her in their original form faithfully and to His glory. serving in Him with Joy, maggie
Maggie Van Syckle
"Come out of darkness into the light through Christ Jesus."
_____
Do You Yahoo!?
Send FREE Valentine eCards with Yahoo! Greetings! <http://rd.yahoo.com/mail_us/tag/?http://greetings.yahoo.com> | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
---------------
Please be informed, a meeting has been scheduled to discuss the Enron's
Options Program on Tuesday, June 6th, 4:00 - 5:00p in the Video Conference
Room - EB-49C2 (7C1 - Omaha).
Drew, we are aware that you will be in Austin on Tuesday and may not be able
to participate.
Thanks in advance for marking your calendars.
adr | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
(See attached file: HPLN0119.xls)
- HPLN0119.xls | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Mary:
Enclosed is the Counterparty form that we have come up with for Multi-Product
Guarantys. Depending upon the products that need to be covered, each
Guaranty will need to be modified to make sure that it describes the proper
entities and products. I will send along the Enron form of this shortly but
please pass this along to the appropriate people in the credit group.
Jeff, Stacy and Harry,
Are you going to change the Physical product form of Guaranty to look more
like this? Power has changed their form and it may help for us to all be
consistent especially when we are asked to amend an existing Guaranty to
include more products. If you do decide to amend your form, please send the
new form to credit.
Thanks for everyone's input.
Carol | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Joe:
I think that Tana is right. I guess that if we do a telephone trade and use
the ECC Canada Annex A then we need to make the same modifications to that.
Is that correct? Have they requested any modifications to the online GTC?
Carol
Larry Joe Hunter
05/18/2000 12:14 PM
To: Carol St Clair/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Puget Sound
Carol,
We've had some issues lately with EnronOnline deals and Puget Sound. Should
this entity always be booked with ECC? Currently, depending on the index
traded, it downloads into Trade Capture as either ENA or ECC. In speaking
with Tana the other day we had decided that whichever Enron entity downloads
is the one we should confirm the deal under.
thanks,
Joe
Carol St Clair 05/18/2000 10:02 AM
To: Larry Joe Hunter/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Susan Bailey/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bob Bowen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jefferson D
Sorenson/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Puget Sound
Joe:
We are entering into an Agreement with Puget Sound Energy, Inc. in which we
are agreeing to some chnages to our new form of Annex A. Enclosed is the new
form which we have agreed to which should be attached to all trades done with
Puget after February 2, 2000. Alos enclosed is the Agreement that we will
enter into. Call me if you have any questions.
Carol St. Clair
EB 3892
713-853-3989 (Phone)
713-646-3393 (Fax) | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
To All:
After speaking to Bill, we are giving approval to this second transaction
between JM Huber and ENA with the condition that the assignment of transport
capacity is taken on by JM for BOTH transactions as previously discussed, and
I initial this contract which clearly states this assignment of capacity. It
was our assumption, in Credit, that this initial transaction with JM was to
include the assignment of capacity, which lead to a re-evaluation of the
credit reserve. It is imperative now, that once the contract and
transactions are executed, they be re-confirmed in TAGG to more accurately
reflect the exposure of JM
Russell | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Start Date: 3/4/01; HourAhead hour: 9; No ancillary schedules awarded. No
variances detected.
LOG MESSAGES:
PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001030409.txt
---- Energy Import/Export Schedule ----
*** Final schedule not found for preferred schedule.
Details:
TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
SC_ID: ECTRT
MKT_TYPE: 2
TRANS_DATE: 3/4/01
TIE_POINT: PVERDE_5_DEVERS
INTERCHG_ID: EPMI_CISO_SCOUT
ENGY_TYPE: WHEEL
*** Final schedule not found for preferred schedule.
Details:
TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
SC_ID: ECTRT
MKT_TYPE: 2
TRANS_DATE: 3/4/01
TIE_POINT: SYLMAR_2_NOB
INTERCHG_ID: EPMI_CISO_SCOUT
ENGY_TYPE: WHEEL | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
9:00 Tuesday
-----Original Message-----
From: Centilli, James
Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 10:57 AM
To: Geaccone, Tracy
Subject: RE: Southern Trails Project
You have a choice of 8:00AM Monday or 9:00 AM Tuesday. Kim Watson is having a meeting 9 to 11AM on Monday with due diligence team to discuss Southern Trails.
James
-----Original Message-----
From: Geaccone, Tracy
Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 10:52 AM
To: Centilli, James
Subject: RE: Southern Trails Project
Monday am or Tuesday am before all Employee meeting
-----Original Message-----
From: Centilli, James
Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 10:43 AM
To: Geaccone, Tracy
Subject: FW: Southern Trails Project
When is convenient for you?
James
-----Original Message-----
From: Ratner, Michael
Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 12:13 AM
To: Centilli, James
Cc: Geaccone, Tracy
Subject: RE: Southern Trails Project
I am out of town starting Tuesday afternoon, but am free most of the day Monday and Tuesday am.
Cheers.
-----Original Message-----
From: Centilli, James
Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 11:38 AM
To: Ratner, Michael
Cc: Geaccone, Tracy
Subject: Southern Trails Project
Do you have some time next week to bring you up to date on the project. Let Tracy and I know your availability for next week.
Thanks,
James | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Do you have time to talk about the direct connection issues tomorrow
(Thursday) afternoon at 3:00 NY time? I also have some new issues regarding
the need (or hopefully lack thereof) for written confirmations of online
transactions which we can tee up then. | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Hi Louise,
I asked each of my directs to consider 3 levels of cuts. I told them this is strictly an exercise at this point and that we haven't been given targets (trying to keep the emotion down). The three levels were:
A. Remove capability for new projects but retain a reasonable ability to continue growth of our current application suite.
B. Reduce to minimal development capability. Retain ability for operations and minor enhancements to applications.
C. Cut to life-support level. Retain ability to operate the applications and fix bugs.
The cut levels are as follows:
A. Reduce by 11 (to 129)
B. Reduce by 21 (to 108)
C. Reduce by 17 (to 91)
Jeff Johnson placed himself in the A cuts, though I removed him from that cut thinking I can talk him out of it. He is in the B cut.
Steve Stock placed himself in the B cuts.
Michael Guadarrama placed himself in the B cuts. He said he would probably leave if the A cuts were made but would wait until we got through the transition.
Hopefully we can hold this together.
I'll try to call you to discuss.
Thanks.
--jay
Jay Webb | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
This impacts the following deals in Sitara,
Deal 222734 - purchase from Alliance
Deal 265943 - purchase from Meng
Deal 227992 - transport usage
---------------------- Forwarded by Chris Germany/HOU/ECT on 09/06/2000 01:24
PM ---------------------------
Chris Germany
09/06/2000 01:04 PM
To: Kyle R Lilly/HOU/ECT@ECT, Alicia Perkins/HOU/ECT@ECT, Crystal
Hyde/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Mary Theresa Franklin/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeanne Wukasch/Corp/Enron@ENRON
Subject: CNR curve
I changed the formula on the IF-CNRGATH curve in the EastMrkt file. Before
the change it was CGT/APPALAC - $.32. After the change its (CGAS -
$.30)x(1-.0492). This widens the spread by about $.24. | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
The Commission issued an order on May 8, 2001 in Illinois Power Co. Docket No. ER01-123 (as well as ComEd, Ameren and Alliance) that accepted the Settlement filed by the Alliance and MISO on 3/31/01. The Settlement:
provided for the continuation of two separate RTOs in the Midwest - ARTO and MISO - to be operational by 12/15/01
provides for a single, non-pancaked Super-Regional rate for transactions with sources and sinks within the two- RTO Super Region
provides that ARTO and MISO will negotiate with PJM to develop a joint rate methodology
includes an Inter-Regional Cooperation Agreement committing the ARTO and MISO to develop compatible protocols and formats, share information and data, develop a combined reservations and scheduling system, coordinate on TLRs, and develop procedures for real-time operational disputes.
allowed withdrawal of IP, ComEd and Ameren from MISO to join ARTO with an exit fee of $60 million to cover start up costs.
Enron had filed comments opposing the settlement arguing that it failed to resolve the issues of the Midwest market. Enron argued the the settlement did not provide for sufficient RTO scope, did not resolve rate pancaking, parallel path flow, and other operational and seams issues.
The Commission's order on the settlement continues the Hebert "incremental approach" to RTO's that it has exhibited in its prior RTO orders. The Chief Judge had certified the settlement over Enron's opposition, claiming Enron was asking the FERC to go beyond the scope of Order No. 2000. Some of the important findings in the order are summarized below.
Accepted the Alliance stakeholder process over objections of Enron and several marketers. Alliance will file its stakeholder plan by May 15 and parties may raise concerns at that time. This does seem a late filing given that the RTO is to be operational by 12/15/01. In the meantime, Alliance has held three meetings, focusing on interconnection procedures and congestion management. They are continuing to meet with stakeholders every two weeks - this seems better than required by this order.
The Super-regional rate is not applicable to imports of generation into the Region. This is definitely an example of the "incremental approach." The Commission was very impressed that the Alliance and MISO represented the largest areas ever proposed for elimination of rate pancaking. The order did recognize the competitive advantage this gave to generators within the Super Region vis-a-vis those located outside the Region, but noted that absent the settlement, transactions would incur two separate transmission rates.
Sufficiency of scope and configuration will be determined in the respective RTO dockets. Although the settlement provided that the scope of ARTO and MISO were sufficient, the Commission refused to make that determination in this order. Note that the Alliance scope and configuration has been found to be sufficient to comply with Order No. 2000 in the Alliance January 24, 2001 order.
Enron argued the Midwest transmission grid should be under the control of a single operator to provide for a seamless market. The FERC finds that issue to be premature. This is again the "incremental approach;" the Commission encourages further efforts to build on the framework of the settlement to develop common processes and move toward an ultimate goal of a single operational RTO for the Midwest. This open-ended issue may provide a good opportunity to set up a meeting with FERC staff to discuss future steps to work toward this ultimate goal.
Enron had argued that the IRCA was not a sufficient commitment to a seamless Midwest market. The order accepts this aspect of the settlement, but allows that Enron and all parties can raise further concerns once coordination proposals are filed.
The Commission will not require joint energy imbalance and congestion management mechanisms at this time. FERC found no basis in Order No. 2000 to find that multiple systems could not be compatible. The order did not address Enron's argument that the settlement should provide for a real-time energy market, rather than just a balancing market.
A market monitoring committee is to be formed which will agree upon an independent market monitor for the Cooperating RTOs.
The settlement provides for a moratorium on the transitional pricing structure through 2004, subject to an exception for new investment.. The FERC accepts this provision due the rate certainty it provides.
If you want a copy of the order, let me know. | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Ed:
How about 1 in Lisa's office?
Carol St. Clair
EB 4539
713-853-3989 (phone)
713-646-3393 (fax)
281-382-1943 (cell phone)
8774545506 (pager)
281-890-8862 (home fax)
[email protected]
-----Original Message-----
From: Sacks, Edward
Sent: Wednesday, December 26, 2001 9:31 AM
To: St. Clair, Carol
Subject: RE: Great Bay
I am glad to me with you. When, where? | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Today we announced the appointment of Jeff McMahon as Enron's chief financial officer. In my continued discussions with the financial community yesterday and today, it became clear that this move was required to restore investor confidence. Jeff has unparalleled qualifications and a deep and thorough understanding of Enron. He is already on the job and hard at work on the issues before us. Andy Fastow will be on a leave of absence from the company.
Jeff had been serving as chairman and CEO of Enron Industrial Markets. He joined Enron in 1994 and spent three years in the London office as chief financial officer for Enron's European operations. Upon returning to the U.S., Jeff was executive vice president of finance and treasurer for Enron Corp. In 2000, he was named president and chief operating officer of Enron Net Works.
I know all of you are concerned about the continuing decline in our share price. I am too, and we are working very hard to turn it around. Appointing Jeff as CFO is one important step in that process. But most of the solution involves just continuing to do our jobs with excellence. The fundamentals of our business are strong, and I think the market will begin to see that as we continue to perform.
Please join me in giving Jeff your full support, and thank you for all of your continued hard work. | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
ISDA PRESS REPORT - MAY 18, 2001
* Proposed Rule Would Ease Transition Of SEC-Registered Firms to CFTC
Oversight - BNA
* Brokers will respond once they smell money - Business Standard
* Tax dues mar brokers foray into derivatives - Business Standard
* New attack on proposal to allow advertising by hedge funds -
Financial Times
Proposed Rule Would Ease Transition Of SEC-Registered Firms to CFTC
Oversight
BNA - May 18, 2001
The Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) proposed new rules May 14
that would relax the registration requirements of Securities and Exchange
Commission-registered broker-dealers wishing to cross over and trade
security futures products.
In a May 17 Federal Register notice, the futures regulatory agency said it
wants to amend its rules so that such broker dealers can seek CFTC
registration by notice filing (66 Fed. Reg. 27,476, 5/17/01). Currently, all
potential futures commission merchants (FCMs) and introducing brokers, as
traders of commodities and futures are categorized, must file at least two
registration forms with the CFTC.
CEA Revised
When Congress revised the Commodity Exchange Act (CEA) in December, it
allowed single stock futures and futures on certain narrow-based stock
indices for the first time in nearly 20 years. Such instruments--"security
futures"--are expected to be offered by firms that do not typically conduct
transactions in futures products, creating a regulatory dilemma.
The proposed new rule would allow any broker-dealer that limits its futures
activity to security futures products and that is in good standing with the
SEC to become registered with the CFTC "with the submission of notice." In
this case, notice would likely be filed with the National Futures
Association, the CFTC said.
The commission also proposed a rule that would allow such registrants to
avoid the requirement that all FCMs be members of a registered futures
association.
Though it is operating under a voluntary moratorium on new rules requested
by the White House, the CFTC has received permission from the Office of
Management and Budget to propose rules that arose out of Congress's sweeping
reform package, known as the Commodity Futures Modernization Act, which
passed in December. The moratorium, which was extended to all government
entities under interim leadership back in January, is expected to be in
place until someone is named to chair the commission permanently.
Brokers will respond once they smell money
Business Standard - May 18, 2001
By Janaki Krishnan and Tamal Bandopadhyay
Once a staunch supporter of badla, Securities and Exchange Board of India
(Sebi) board member J R Varma has in the recent past been a strong proponent
of replacing the product with derivatives . Two days after the capital
market watchdog rang the death knell for badla and ushered in derivatives
trading in a big way, a relaxed Varma justified his stand to Janaki Krishnan
and Tamal Bandopadhyay. "Carry-forward has lost its historic relevance. If
instead of a complex product that does many things hedging, speculation,
finance, we have products that do different things, but do them better, I
think it is preferable to make the transition." Extracts:
Q. Will the migration from carry forward to the derivatives market be easy?
Will it be painless?
A: No. I would be untruthful to myself if I say that that the transition
will be painless. There will surely be pain as a system migrates from the
familiarity of badla to the complexities of derivatives trading. But at the
end of the day, you have to see whether it is a pain worth taking. To my
mind, this is certainly the case. The Indian equities market has to move up
to better products even if it means some short-term adjustment pains.
Q: Do you think volumes will dry up?
A: Certainly not. It will be fairly liquid and vibrant. There may be a drop
in volumes at the initial stage, but in six to eight months, I expect the
markets to revive to their normal levels of activity.
Q. The Sebi had introduced index futures in June last year. What has been
the experience so far?
A: Ever since index futures were introduced in June last year, there has
been a slow but steady growth. The trading volumes are growing every month.
Last July was better than June and so it continued. In February 2001, the
average daily trading was worth around Rs 50 crore. So it is very clear that
the product (index futures) fills in some perceived need in the market for
such a product. Otherwise, such products die a very quick death. The
increasing volumes also tell us that it is attracting new adherents by the
day, which means those who started early have stayed on and their
experiences are helping new players to come into the market. In that sense,
I am satisfied. But mind you, this is growth on a low base. We still have a
long way to go. It has been the global experience that the derivatives
markets take off slowly. Typically, you have to give it one-and-a-half to
two years to reach critical mass. If the Indian markets do not show signs of
growth in the next six to seven months, after taking into account the one
year in which index futures has been around, then we have a problem.... In
our case the experience is not terribly bad but certainly not as good as one
would have expected.
Q. What is the level of preparedness of the market participants?
A: The stock exchanges are by and large prepared. They have already been
trading in index futures, and hopefully, their software and systems are in
place. Coming to brokers, I think they have to make an effort to set their
back offices and trading strategies in order. But I am very optimistic that
the brokers will respond to the new regime enthusiastically, once they smell
money in terms of trading opportunities. Well, it is a challenge since the
margining system is much more complex, and the methodology of computing
margins is not a straight calculation. In fact, the challenge is in getting
the margins right.
Q: Do you think the ordinary investor will embrace the new system or will he
be marginalised?
A: I pin my highest hopes on the Indian investor who has shown a great
capacity to learn. Everyone is on the learning curve, but once the average
investor realises the benefits of the new system, he is sure to take the
plunge.
Q: The big question remains: earlier you were a badla supporter, why have
you changed your stance?
A: (Laughs) Well yes, I was a strong badla supporter when badla was banned
in 1992. In fact, I was among the few who protested the badla ban then. My
point was simple: how can you take away whatever rudimentary instruments
investors have to hedge themselves against risk? And, if you have a
theoretical problem with badla, you must have a better system to replace it
with. In 1992-93, we didn't have an alternative.
I had written a paper (in 1993-93) where I argued that badla was meeting a
whole lot of requirements in the system. For instance, if you remember that
was the time when all shares were in paper form. So if a guy had sent shares
for transfer which often took two months or more then he couldn't sell in
the interim period. Badla gave him the opportunity to exit by selling first
and postponing delivery till such time as he got the shares to deliver.
Badla was a hedging mechanism that doubled up as a tool for speculation. It
was the only way to have short sales in the system, which is the ultimate
bulwark against the bullish price manipulation of shares. And, it was the
only means of getting finance into the equity markets. So there were three
or four very obvious functions that badla was doing. If you look at the
scenario now, demat has removed the issue of delays in getting shares
transferred...so on, the stock lending scheme has replaced badla as the
preferred option to get shares to make deliveries in case of short sales.
Badla has lost its relevance now.
Q: But do derivatives fill in all the market requirements?
A: Please understand that there are lots of specific products that have been
introduced in the system over the last decade that fulfill each of these
requirements individually. So instead of a complex system, which served all
purposes in a sub-optimal manner, now we have an array of specialised
products that deliver specific services and do it better. In derivatives ,
we have a world class hedging tool now available to Indian investors.
Q: You said that globally, the derivatives markets take two years to develop
fully. How much time do you give yourself for the Indian derivatives market
to reach critical mass?
A: I would give it six to nine months. By early 2002, I expect average daily
volumes of Rs 100 crore.
Q: What will be the role of banks in the new system?
A: Of course, banks will continue to be the fulcrum of the new system, too.
We will need to have clearing banks that settle the cash part of the
transactions. Plus, there will be a whole new vista of opportunities for
banks in the derivatives markets. For instance, banks can do "calendar
spreads" as yet another method of parking their surplus funds and earning
returns.
Calendar spreads are nothing but simple contracts where banks buy an option
for a near period (say June) and sell it for a longer period, (say
September). It is like a forward-to-forward contract in the foreign exchange
markets, and banks can get positive returns. In the long run, this can be a
huge market like the overnight call money market where banks can park their
short-term funds.
Q. Do you think financing will be an issue in the markets when badla
financiers are thrown out of the new system?
A: It is not true that badla financiers will be removed from the system. It
is just their methods of operations will change. They can arbitrage between
the cash market and derivatives markets and even within the derivatives
market. By deploying their funds between different parts of the market, they
will not only impart depth to the markets, but will also make a decent
return on their funds.
Q: The way you put it, is the system going to be a level playing field for
foreign institutional investor, mutual funds and large players? In the badla
system, these players, for instance, were prohibited from short selling.
A: I think it is a level playing field for everyone though I have received
some queries whether FIIs will also be allowed to short sell. We are
negotiating with RBI.
Q: What is the issue with FIIs?
A: There is no issue. It is just that the RBI had mandated that FIIs can
only buy derivative contracts to hedge against an underlying position. So if
an FII had a purchase position in the spot market, it could short sell in
futures, but not a naked short sale. Maybe there is a policy issue
somewhere, but we are in dialogue with the central bank and hope to resolve
the issue.
Tax dues mar brokers foray into derivatives
Business Standard - May 18, 2001
By Aniek Paul
The Securities and Exchange Board of India (Sebi) has decided that the
brokers seeking fresh registration for the derivatives segment, will have to
first clear their turnover tax dues to the market regulator.
Brokers are upset with the decision, and feel that this would deter the
growth of the derivatives market as the tax would mean an additional burden
on them, and substantially reduce the interest in the segment, which needs
to grow fast.
According to rough estimates, the aggregate dues of the broking firms to
Sebi as outstanding tax on turnover is about Rs 800 crore. The amount due
from individual brokers varies from few lakh to several crores.
The brokers had moved court disputing the Sebi's claim, but they lost their
case in the Supreme Court in February this year, after a protracted legal
battle.
In addition to the dues to be cleared, brokers would have to pay the
standard registration fee - which even for a trading member is about Rs 20
lakh - and for the software.
Sebi has also mandated that all broking firms seeking registration for the
derivative segment must have at least two experts in derivatives trading
with a NCFM (NSE Certification for Financial Markets) certificate.
Sebi full time board member Jayanth R Varma said: "It is untenable that the
brokers will be offered registration for a new segment without clearing
their dues. Besides, when the apex court has upheld Sebi's claims, the
brokers cannot get away without paying it."
Speaking on the various nuances of the derivatives segment, Varma said, in
the beginning the derivatives segment would be `cash-settled', implying that
the difference between the strike price and reigning market price would be
paid to the gainer, and securities would not be delivered.
"We will follow the American model in individual stock options, and the
European model in index options," Varma said. In the American model, one can
exercise the option at any point during the entire life of the option, while
in the European model, the right to exercise the option is restricted within
a specific time frame.
Varma also said, it would take the market regulator a couple of meetings to
fine-tune the risk management system for the segment. Varma added, in the
next board meetings, Sebi would discuss whether smaller exchanges like
Calcutta Stock Exchange would be allowed to start their own derivatives
segment.
New attack on proposal to allow advertising by hedge funds
Financial Times - May 18, 2001
By JOHN AUTHERS
The Investment Company Institute, the trade association for the US mutual
fund industry, started its annual meeting in Washington yesterday with a
renewed attack on proposals to allow hedge funds to advertise.
Matthew Fink, the institute's president, said hedge fund advertising could
create "serious and unnecessary risks" to public confidence in the industry.
Hedge funds should accept greater regulation if they wanted to open
themselves to the general public, he said.
"If parallel industries are permitted to develop - one regulated, one
unregulated - the only direction we are destined to move in is a race to the
bottom, as competitive forces pressure all firms to minimise regulatory
costs."
The Managed Funds Association, which represents hedge funds, wants
relaxation of the rules against advertising but says it does not want to
compete for retail investors.
The institute also took the opportunity to respond to the widespread belief
that mutual fund flows make the market more volatile. This followed an
outflow of Dollars 20.6bn from equity mutual funds in March, the highest
monthly outflow on record. This appears to have been followed by a heavy
inflow in April.
Terry Glenn, chairman of Merrill Lynch funds and chairman of the Institute,
denied there was any sign of panic from mutual fund investors during the
early months of this year.
"'Panic' is not a word one would associate with our investors. Shareholders
are not insensitive to stock price movements but their response to market
movements tends to be spread over time."
Mr Glenn added that fund investors have never responded to sharp market
falls by redeeming shares en masse, in any period since the war. "There is
no evidence that this long-established pattern of behaviour will change," he
said.
**End of ISDA Press Report for May 18, 2001.**
THE ISDA PRESS REPORT IS PREPARED FOR THE LIMITED USE OF ISDA STAFF, ISDA'S
BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND SPECIFIED CONSULTANTS TO ISDA. THIS PRESS REPORT IS
NOT FOR DISTRIBUTION (EITHER WITHIN OR WITHOUT AN ORGANIZATION), AND ISDA IS
NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY USE TO WHICH THESE MATERIALS MAY BE PUT.
Scott Marra
Administrator for Policy & Media Relations
ISDA
600 Fifth Avenue
Rockefeller Center - 27th floor
New York, NY 10020
Phone: (212) 332-2578
Fax: (212) 332-1212
Email: [email protected] | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
- 1-29-2002.xls | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
---------------------- Forwarded by Chris Germany/HOU/ECT on 09/27/2000 03:20
PM ---------------------------
John M Singer@ENRON
09/27/2000 08:38 AM
To: Chris Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Oct EOG & PNG
Power Gas Marketing volumes for October:
EOG = 10,000 Dth/mon
PNG = 3,000 Dth/mon | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
sorry--I left you off the list. df
---------------------- Forwarded by Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron on 02/27/2001
12:10 PM ---------------------------
Drew Fossum
02/27/2001 11:58 AM
To: Mary Kay Miller/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Steven Harris/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Glen
Hass/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Susan Scott/enron@enronXgate, Maria
Pavlou/Enron@EnronXGate, Kevin Hyatt/Enron@EnronXGate, TK
Lohman/Enron@EnronXGate, [email protected], [email protected]
cc: Shelley Corman/Enron@EnronXGate, Michael P Moran/Enron@EnronXGate
Subject: Data Responses
I just had a good conversation with Sempra's regulatory person who is working
on the data responses for Stephanie Katz. Her name is Gillian Wright, and
she is a "regulatory case manager" whatever that is. She was pleased to hear
about the extension til Wed 12:00 for her responses. The best news is that
she was a very chatty individual and was interested in our thoughts on the
questions. I told her that our answer no. 1 was just going to confirm that
the recourse rate is in fact in our tariff where it is supposed to be and it
is always "offered." I suggested that her question no. 1 was a little
different and to me, indicated that FERC just didn't understand the daily
markets at all and further didn't understand very much about index to index
deals and how they might be the best way to contract in many circumstances.
She took that bait and said that their answer would focus on exactly
that--that fixed rate deals create risk issues for trading companies that
index deals lay off. She also said that FERC's questions looked similar to
questions Sempra Trading has had to answer on other deals and that she
thought her answer would be similar. I got a high comfort level that she
viewed this whole thing as no big deal. Are any of you aware of where Sempra
may have been required to answer questions like these??? Kathy R: have you
seen any above-max index deals involving Sempra? It may have been CPUC
questions she was referring to, but I didn't want to make a big deal of it.
Gillian would like to get a fax of our responses to her at 213-244-8820 as
soon as they are ready. Susan and Maria please make sure we get that done.
She said she'd send hers to us as soon as she could, but I didn't push for a
draft to review as her thinking sounds consistent with ours.
As for Sid, Scott Walker's regulatory guy won't be available until tomorrow
morning. Scott is having him call me then to discuss the answers. Scott was
appreciative of the extension, but frankly didn't sound like he planned to
meet the Tuesday deadline anyway. In fact, I'm not sure he cares all that
much about meeting the new Wed. deadline. DF | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
- NP 15 pages.xls | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <[email protected]>
From: [email protected]
Full-name: GemanIX
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2000 17:41:17 EDT
Subject: Re : Paris Conference
To: [email protected]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
X-Mailer: AOL 3.0.i for Windows 95 sub 116
Dear Vince,
Thank you for letting me know!The booklets of
the program and list of participants with the
beautiful cover are going to press.I am really
sorry,please,take 5 minutes to read the brilliant
titles of my invited speakers!
Looking forward to hearing from Karla.We keep
making progress,with many computations being
possible in Excel or C++
Best regards
Helyette | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Start Date: 4/26/01; HourAhead hour: 3; HourAhead schedule download failed.
Manual intervention required. | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
You have received this email because you signed up to receive valuable email offers from RadioStakes or one of our marketing partners.
Dear PATRICE,
Stop betting on the house...let the house bet on you!
Book your next Las Vegas vacation and enjoy free rooms at luxurious casinos, meals and various comps based on your level of play. PlaySys.com will find you the best comps available for slots and tables before you even get to the casino! Log on and book your favorite offer today!
Tropicana Resort & Casino
Under the bright lights of the strip! Play the slots $3 per pull, 4 hours per day, and receive a free double room, food and beverage and airport pick-up.
For more info, click here:
Lady Luck
Luck be a lady tonight! Play on the tables with an average bet of $25, 4 hours per day, and enjoy a free double room, comp drinks and 25% discount on meals.
For more info, click here:
Rio Suite Hotel & Casino
Your very own personal paradise: the Rio! Play Video Poker with an average
bet of $5 per hand, 4 hours per day, and get a free suite.
For more info, click here:
Stratosphere Hotel Casino
Play the tables with an average bet of $50 per hand, 4 hours per day, and receive a complimentary double room in the highest hotel in Vegas!
For more info, click here:
Venetian Hotel
Play reel slots in the semi-private high-limit slot area with an average bet of $5 per pull, 5 hours per day, and receive a deluxe suite.
For more info, click here:
Tropicana Resort & Casino
At the heart of the action! play the tables with an average bet of $50 per hand, 4 hours per day and receive a free double room.
For more info, click here:
Stratosphere Hotel Casino
Play slots at the sky high Stratosphere, $6 per pull, 4 hours per day, and enjoy a free double room, food and beverage allowance of $150/day, limo to/from the airport, and an airfare refund of up to $50. For more info, click here:
Rio Suite Hotel & Casino
High-action gaming comes alive! Play an average bet of $75 per hand, 4 hours per day, and get a Free suite at the Rio All Suite Hotel.
For more info, click here:
Hurry and take advantage of these offers while the casinos are still willing to make them: they're going like hotcakes!
For more offers, come to the Playsis.com website, or call us toll free 1-877-260-9528, 24 hours a day.
Happy gaming!
Team PlaySys
You have received this email because you signed up to receive valuable email offers from RadioStakes or one of our marketing partners.
To no longer receive messages please click here.
You may also unsubscribe from our e-mail list by writing to us at:
487R Central Avenue, Cedarhurst, NY 11516 | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
See Attachment:
Rgds.
Samuel x3-9890
(GCP_ENA) | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
doing anything this weekend
-----Original Message-----
From: Nelson, Michelle
Sent: Friday, January 04, 2002 1:12 PM
To: Maggi, Mike
Subject: RE:
nothing i was bored
-----Original Message-----
From: Maggi, Mike
Sent: Friday, January 04, 2002 1:12 PM
To: Nelson, Michelle
Subject: RE:
just walked in from lunch, whats up
-----Original Message-----
From: Nelson, Michelle
Sent: Friday, January 04, 2002 11:34 AM
To: Maggi, Mike
Subject:
are you here yet? | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Time running out on Edison deal
Sacramento Bee, September 14, 2001
Enron agrees to turn over documents to Senate investigators
San Diego Union Tribune, September 13, 2001
California lawmakers face largest issue, hundreds of bills on final day of session
San Francisco Chronicle, September 14, 2001
Westerners look to windmills as possible saviors of a way of life
San Francisco Chronicle, September 14, 2001
Edison's bailout down to the wire
Sacramento Bee, September 14, 2001
Time running out on Edison deal
By Jennifer Coleman
Associated Press Writer
SACRAMENTO (AP) -- State lawmakers prepared to rush through hundreds of measures in the remaining two days of the legislative session, but one massive issue remained unsolved Thursday (AP) -- if and how the state will help Southern California Edison avoid bankruptcy.
By Thursday afternoon, the Senate had done little to consider the Assembly's revision of a plan the Senate passed in July. Without a Senate vote, the rescue plan will die and leave Edison faced with bankruptcy.
Without a rescue, "we have every indication from Edison that they'll file for bankruptcy," said Steve Maviglio, the spokesman for Gov. Gray Davis, who negotiated a deal with Edison in April.
That deal allows the utility to issue revenue bonds, backed by customer bills, to pay most of its $3.9 billion in debts. It also gives the state an option to buy the utility's transmission grid for about $2.4 billion and hold development rights on more than 20,000 acres of Edison land.
The Legislature must approve the deal by the time it adjourns Friday. Lawmakers are also in a special session devoted to energy issues, which could last longer than the regular session.
The state's other large utility, Pacific Gas and Electric Co., filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy in April, after amassing about $8.9 billion due to last year's sky-high electricity costs. Edison says it has accrued $3.9 billion in debts.
Now, the Senate has an altered version of Davis' deal, but it appears unlikely to pass it. The bill currently allows Edison to sell $2.9 billion in bonds.
Instead, senators could "gut and amend" an Assembly measure, reverting the deal to something closer to the version they sent the Assembly.
In that bill, by Sen. Richard Polanco, D-Los Angeles, the utility's bond issue would be capped at $2.5 billion and the state's option to buy the grid would be for the lines' book value. Edison opposed that deal, saying it would not return them to financial solvency.
Senate President Pro Tem John Burton, a San Francisco Democrat, has been reluctant to pass an Edison deal. Maviglio said the governor's staff was trying to work with Burton's to come up with something.
"We're ready and willing to meet when he is," Maviglio said.
The Senate Energy Committee, which could meet Thursday evening, is considering amending an Assembly bill already in their house. That bill would have to be approved by the energy and fiscal committees, then sent to the floor for a vote by the full Senate.
If that happens, "there's nothing we can do," said Assembly Republican spokeswoman Dana O'Donnell. "It's coming back for concurrence. That means we can't amend it, we can only either vote on it or not vote on it."
Consumer groups opposed the bill approved by the Assembly last week.
"We're working pretty hard to prevent them from doing anything," said consumer advocate Doug Heller with the Foundation for Taxpayer and Consumer Rights. That organization has promised to mount a ballot measure to reverse any Edison rescue deal approved by the Legislature.
Enron agrees to turn over documents to Senate investigators
By Jennifer Coleman
ASSOCIATED PRESS
September 13, 2001
SACRAMENTO - Enron Corp. agreed Thursday to release company documents to a Senate committee investigating possible price manipulation, ending the committee's quest to cite the energy company for contempt for not complying with a subpoena.
The Senate Rules Committee heard arguments from Enron and the Senate Select Committee to Investigate Price Manipulation of the Wholesale Energy Market over whether the energy company should be found in contempt.
In June, the select committee subpoenaed Enron files as part of its investigation into record-high prices in the state's wholesale electricity market. Enron sued to quash the subpoena, a motion a judge rejected.
The judge agreed, however, that Enron was entitled to a protective order for documents revealing sensitive trading and financial information.
Sen. Joe Dunn, D-Santa Ana, chairman of the select committee, said late Thursday that Enron agreed to the same confidentiality agreement accepted by several other generators. With that agreement, Dunn said, the committee would withdraw a report that recommended Enron be found in contempt.
He said he expects documents to be transferred immediately.
Dunn had argued the subpoena also covered nonconfidential documents, and since the energy company also refused to release those papers to the committee, it was in contempt.
He asked Sen. John Burton, D-San Francisco, chairman of the rules committee, to approve fines against Enron for each day they didn't comply with the subpoena. The daily fines would start at $1,000, doubling each day for 10 days. Then the company would be fined $1 million a day.
Enron lawyer Michael Kirby said the company had put 49,000 nonconfidential documents in a depository in Sacramento so committee investigators could review them.
But Dennis Murphy, a lawyer for the select committee, said Enron didn't tell investigators where the depository was located. The committee discovered the address in documents filed by Enron for the court case, he said.
"We've been trying to get into the depository for a week. They have not allowed our people in there to verify what documents are in there," he said.
Kirby disputed that, and blamed the committee for delays in turning over the balance of the documents. The two parties haven't met since the judge ordered the protective order, and Kirby said it was the committee that refused to work out the order's details.
Dunn said the law requires Enron to produce the documents before it was entitled to a protective order.
Sen. Ross Johnson, R-Irvine, said Dunn's push to have Enron found in contempt "smacks at this point of Enron being punished for exercising their right to go to court."
A contempt report on Reliant Energy has also been sent to the Senate. A contempt finding against Mirant Corp. was later reversed when the company opened a document depository in Sacramento for the committee's investigators.
If the full Senate imposes sanctions against Reliant or Enron, it will be the first time since 1929, when the Senate voted to jail reluctant witnesses during a committee investigation of price fixing and price gouging involving cement sales to the state.
California lawmakers face largest issue, hundreds of bills on final day of session
State lawmakers faced a mammoth task on the final day of the legislative session as they tackle a rescue plan for Southern California Edison and hundreds of bills to complete by a midnight deadline.
The terrorist attacks on Tuesday forced lawmakers to skip a full day of proceedings, creating an even busier final day that could possibly drag into Saturday.
During a marathon session Thursday and early Friday, lawmakers redrew their own district lines, approved twin handgun license bills and a measure allowing in-state college tuition for certain immigrants.
Lawmakers still have to consider another version of Gov. Gray Davis' plan to rescue Southern California Edison from bankruptcy. The latest plan would let the utility issue $2.5 billion in bonds, leaving the company with $1.4 billion in debt.
Without a rescue, "we have every indication from Edison that they'll file for bankruptcy," said Steve Maviglio, the spokesman for Davis.
The cash-strapped utility and Pacific Gas and Electric say they've lost nearly $14 billion since June 2000 to high wholesale prices the state's electricity deregulation law bars them from passing on to consumers. PG&E filed for federal bankruptcy protection April 6.
Another top priority of the Legislature was redrawing district lines to reflect population changes reported in Census 2000.
The Assembly and Senate approved district plans for themselves and Congress, sending them to Davis for his approval.
Westerners look to windmills as possible saviors of a way of life
Wash. (AP) -- Like many ranchers facing pressure from developers, Shirley Hindman worries that one day she might have to break up her Nine Mile Ranch, one of the largest spreads in the Walla Walla Valley.
"That would make me sick," she says.
But now she and her father, Billy, have found another way to protect their 14,000 acres of sagebrush-covered hills and canyonland. The answer has come in the wind -- something "we have plenty of," she says.
And something also in growing demand.
Soon the ridgelines across Highway 12 from Hindman's corrals will be dotted by windmills. By next year Hindman and several other property owners, including a nearby college, expect to be landlords to the world's largest wind farm.
Along southeastern Washington and into neighboring Oregon, 450 Danish-built windmills -- sleek white towers 200 feet high with rotors 200 feet across -- will churn out enough power for 75,000 families served by Pacificorp, one of the Northwest's leading electric utilities.
Nearly 100 of the wind turbines already are producing. Gravel roads and concrete slabs for the others are in place. "It will help us keep Nine Mile. It will help us sustain a way of life," says Hugh Preston, Ms. Hindman's husband.
More than just an economic hedge for farmers and ranchers, wind farms across the West and upper Midwest are emerging as a growing part of the nation's electricity picture. Major projects are operating or earmarked for completion within a year in Texas, Montana, Minnesota, Kansas and Nevada.
While windmills still account for only a fraction of 1 percent of the electricity produced in the United States, they no longer are the exotic playthings of a few dreamers. Increasingly, big-time players are showing interest in wind to supplement fossil fuel-powered electricity plants, nuclear reactors and hydroelectric dams.
"Wind is a technology that's now reliable and proven," says Robert Morrison, vice president for renewable business development at FPL Energy, the Florida-based company building the 300-megawatt Oregon-Washington project. The cost of generating electricity from wind has declined from 38 cents a kilowatt-hour 20 years ago, to 3 to 5 cents a kilowatt hour in today's larger projects, says the industry. That's competitive with natural gas.
"Suddenly this stuff is economical," says Morrison, whose company has other wind projects under way or being planned in a half-dozen states including Texas, Kansas and Wisconsin.
Other emerging players include Enron, the giant Houston-based energy conglomerate, and the government's Bonneville Power Administration, which this year sought $1 billion worth of wind energy projects and received more bids than expected.
"The response blew us away," said George Darr, Bonneville's manager for renewable resources. Some of the projects will begin operating late next year.
Windmills now account for only about 2,500 megawatts of generating capacity nationwide, but the production is expected almost to double by the end of 2001 to provide enough electricity for 1.3 million households. The industry anticipates that in two decades wind power will grow to 100,000 megawatts and account for 6 percent of the country's electricity.
In comparison, nuclear power currently provides about 20 percent of U.S. electricity, coal-fired plants 52 percent.
Wind's sudden popularity has astounded even its biggest boosters.
"We are in a boom year," says Randall Swisher, executive director of the American Wind Energy Association, the industry's trade group in Washington, D.C. "We are expecting huge growth, especially in the West."
That is good news for David Bittersdorf, president of NRG Systems Inc., a Vermont company that makes wind-measuring devices. "We've grown 40 percent this year," he says. His company, which had $10 million in sales, expects business to quadruple over the next five years.
For the Hindman family at Nine Mile Ranch, turbines rising from the scrub mean cash in the bank, while not interfering with their 700 head of cattle. Typically, farmers and ranchers involved in such lease arrangements get about $2,000 a year per turbine.
"Wind is a very lucrative crop for farmers," says Bill Clemens, president of the chamber of commerce in nearby Walla Walla. The windmills are "a real curiosity" and may even add to the valley's tourist trade, he said.
Ironically, the region does not provide the most ideal locations for wind power.
What some call the Saudi Arabia of wind stretches from eastern Montana and the Dakotas, through Nebraska, Kansas and into Texas -- a region with enough wind potential to power the nation, according to the Energy Department.
James Dehlsen, an early wind energy pioneer, dreams of putting together a massive wind complex of 2,000 turbines stretching over 90 miles of prairie in South Dakota. It would be 10 times as large as the Washington-Oregon project and produce a staggering 3,000 megawatts of electricity.
"We're at the early stages of the project," said Dehlsen, founder of the Zond Corp., a U.S. wind turbine manufacturer that has since been bought by Enron. But he said he already has a commitments from 150 farmers for use of 176,000 acres.
Edison's bailout down to the wire
By Carrie Peyton
Bee Staff Writer
(Published Sept. 14, 2001)
Today could be judgment day for Southern California Edison.
The drive to dig the state's second-largest power company out of its financial hole has reached its final, sleep-deprived hours.
Sometime before the Legislature adjourns late tonight or early Saturday, a $2.5 billion-plus deal could be struck in an effort to keep Edison from following Pacific Gas and Electric Co. into bankruptcy.
An Edison rescue could lock Southern California businesses into rates higher than residents pay.
It could indirectly drive up residential rates statewide by freeing big businesses to strike private deals for electricity, leaving small consumers to pay off the state's costly wholesale power contracts.
And it could still fail to solve Edison's financial problems -- some creditors warn that the utility needs at least $1 billion more to sidestep bankruptcy.
But some, including Gov. Gray Davis, believe it is the best way out of a 15-month-old energy quandary that began when wholesale prices soared so high that Edison could not pay them while prices it charged consumers were frozen.
Consumer groups argued that Edison and its parent company were legally obligated by deregulation to dig into past profits to cover the gap. Edison disagreed.
Since then, Davis has put his prestige on the line with a plan to rescue Edison, which he unveiled three days after PG&E filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection in April.
"We're not doing this for Edison," the governor said in a press release when an Assembly version of the rescue package passed last week. "We're doing it for ourselves, so we can get people who really understand how to buy power back into the power buying business."
Many consumer groups and some lawmakers say bankruptcy courts can best unravel Edison's finances. They argue that the best thing the Legislature could do is nothing.
Some lobbyists give any Edison pact a 50-50 chance of emerging before the weekend.
Edison officials have said repeatedly that the company's many creditors are likely to petition the courts to force it into bankruptcy if no deal is reached by the Legislature's close. They say that could mean lower-quality electric service in the long run.
Meanwhile, the terms of any deal have become caught up in the rush toward adjournment, with its hallway conferences, meetings late into the night and constant trades among interest groups and legislative leaders.
"When you wait until the last few days of the session, this is subject to all sorts of issues that are totally unrelated," said D.J. Smith, a lobbyist for large electricity users.
By Thursday, one key piece of the debate had come down to whether Edison should get $2.5 billion or $2.9 billion from business customers, and how large a business would have to be before it kicks into the Edison rescue.
"This may live and die over an apocryphal Rosie's Dry Cleaners," said Mike Florio, an attorney for The Utility Reform Network, a consumer group. "That has kind of become a symbol here over who's going to have to pay for this bailout, (but) I'm not actually sure this is the most important issue."
Large business groups are lobbying for a big pool of midsize power users to pay off the $2.5 billion or $2.9 billion through extra charges on their electric bills. Senate President Pro Tem John Burton had initially urged that only the largest power users should pay. A compromise figure emerged Thursday but could change again as the measure is amended.
Also in question is how much other energy legislation might be wrapped into a final deal to win votes or allies.
At various times, provisions calling for utilities statewide to sell a set amount of renewable power have been included, as sweeteners for the environmentally minded.
So have provisions that would let businesses sidestep costly long-term state contracts by generating their own electricity or by signing up with other suppliers.
"The clock is running out," said Chriss Street of Street Asset Management, which is advising a committee of Edison creditors. "The real crunch time for all of these negotiations is going to be in the last hours."
Street said the Legislature is avoiding the true issue by refusing to authorize a $3.5 billion to $3.9 billion deal that he said is needed to fully pay all creditors. Without the higher amount, he said, Edison creditors might well force a bankruptcy, believing they could get a better deal in court. | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Dear Colleague,
Having invoked the Govt Of India Gaurantee yesterday, this has no doubt
received front page media attention across the country. While we will be
circulating some of this around, I forward this particularly interesting
editorial from The Economic Times. For those of us who question the state
governments stance refusing to pay and face the frequently encountered charge
of high tariff etc, here's what the countries most widely read and
influential daily has independantly to say in our support:
THE ECONOMIC TIMES
Wednesday Feb 07 2001, http://www.economictimes.com/today/07edit02.htm
A Deserved Downgrade, ( EDITORIAL)
THE rating assigned to four government of Maharashtra supported bonds has,
rightly, been downgraded by Crisil, following non-payment of dues to the
Dabhol Power Corporation by the state government. Predictably, Maharashtra
finance minister Jayant Patil has objected to the downgrade, but that only
shows how out of touch politicians are with commercial reality. This is a
problem not just in Maharashtra but in all states. Politicians have got used
to the nawabi notion that rulers do not really have to pay their legal dues,
and any payments they actually make are a sort of favour.
Maharashtra was earlier regarded as one of the best state governments. But
now it is in fiscal difficulties, like all others. Mr Patil claims Dabhol is
a special case, reflecting not fiscal distress but a political decision not
to pay. Sorry, Mr Patil, but any entity that believes it can default on
payment for political reasons deserves to be punished since it is
demonstrably unreliable. Many believe the Dabhol deal was a high-cost one. So
what? Dozens of public sector projects have suffered cost overruns, but that
is no reason for refusing to pay their dues. The whole point of commercial
rules is that you must abide by the rules of the game even when they involve
a loss. You can legitimately withhold payment only if the original deal was
crooked and broke the law.
This was the accusation made against Dabhol in the mid 1990s, but detailed
investigation failed to unearth evidence of wrong-doing, and dozens of legal
petitions were dismissed by the courts. Cynics say that lack of evidence in
India does not mean innocence. But that cynicism can apply to every single
power project in India, including public sector projects. In life, we all
make some good deals and some bad ones, and need to abide by them
nevertheless. State governments cannot escape this commercial rule. No state
should renege on a deal merely because it was a bad one. If it does so, it
deserves to be downgraded as an unreliable and risky economic partner. The
Crisil downgrade may not mean much of a rise in the state,s immediate
borrowing costs. But it will affect the state,s once-awesome reputation, and
that could be a far higher real cost. | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
more detailed information
---------------------- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/HOU/EES on 08/02/2000 05:22
PM ---------------------------
Leonardo Pacheco@ENRON
08/02/2000 03:41 PM
To: Kenneth Lay/Corp/Enron@Enron, Jeff Skilling/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Joseph W
Sutton/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Cliff Baxter/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mike
McConnell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jay Fitzgerald/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Mark
Palmer/Corp/Enron@ENRON, John Sherriff/LON/ECT@ECT, Greg Whalley/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kimberly Hillis/HOU/ECT@ect, Daniel
Reck/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tim Belden/HOU/ECT@ECT, Thor Lien/OSL/ECT@ECT, Douglas S
Friedman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bob Crane/HOU/ECT@ECT, Joe Gold/LON/ECT@ECT, Richard
Lewis/LON/ECT@ECT, John L Nowlan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Paul
Quilkey/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Mark E Haedicke/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Dave Samuels/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rahil Jafry/HOU/ECT@ECT, Louise
Kitchen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bob Shults/HOU/ECT@ECT, Amita Gosalia/LON/ECT@ECT,
George McClellan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sally Beck/HOU/ECT@ECT, Steven J
Kean/HOU/EES@EES, Jim Fallon/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Nick
Mooney/LON/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey McMahon/HOU/ECT@ECT, Joseph P
Hirl/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, William S Bradford/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Mark Frevert/NA/Enron@Enron, Paula Rieker/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Cedric
Burgher/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Mark Koenig/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Kathryn
Corbally/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: David Forster/Corp/Enron@Enron, Sheri Thomas/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kal
Shah/HOU/ECT@ECT, Andy Zipper/Corp/Enron@Enron, Michael
Danielson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tara Sweitzer/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: EnronOnline Management Report for August 1, 2000
Please see the attached Management Report for August 1, 2000:
Total Today Year To Date Life To Date
Number of Transactions 2,734 219,988 224,989
Gross Notional Value $ 1,371,286,027 105,447,948,516 106,707,606,475
Revenue from Physical flows to date ($) 7,038,045,751 7,133,797,243
New Counterparties transacting today 0
Counterparties having transacted to date 423
Also attached is the Public Domain Report, containing information which is
intended for use in presentations or reports which will be seen by
individuals outside Enron:
Total Life to Date Transactions > 224,000, which is > 59 % of Enron,s
current transactions for the month
Average Daily Transactions > 2,000
Life to Date Notional Value of Transactions > $106 billion
Average Daily Notional Value = Approximately $1 billion, which is 45.5% of
Enron,s Notional Volume
Number of Products Offered Each Day = Approximately 820 | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
This is really just an excuse to write - did you give me the executed pages?
Thanks,
ckm
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 04/30/2001 05:49
PM ---------------------------
"Wright, Tremaine S." <[email protected]> on 04/30/2001
03:33:42 PM
To: "'[email protected]'" <[email protected]>
cc: "'[email protected]'" <[email protected]>, "'[email protected]'"
<[email protected]>, "Kahn, Marguerite R." <[email protected]>,
"DeBerry, Jeremiah A." <[email protected]>
Subject: Signature Pages
Dear Kay,
As of this afternoon, we have not received Enron's original signature pages
for the Letter Agreement and Guaranty. Have these been forwarded to our
office? If so, please advise as to how they were sent and the expected date
of delivery; if not, please let me know when you will be able to send them.
Thanks,
Tremaine Wright
"paulhastings.com" made the following annotations on 04/30/01 16:33:47
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
NEW E-MAIL ADDRESSES AT PAUL, HASTINGS, JANOFSKY & WALKER LLP
We have changed our e-mail address. Our new domain name is paulhastings.com.
In most cases, our address is composed of conventional first name and last
name plus @paulhastings.com. Here are two examples:
[email protected] and [email protected]. If you have any
questions, please contact us at [email protected].
==============================================================================
"The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to
which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged
material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or
taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or
entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you received
this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from all
computers."
============================================================================== | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
----- Forwarded by Joe Hartsoe/Corp/Enron on 10/30/2000 02:59 PM -----
"Jackie Gallagher" <[email protected]>
10/30/2000 02:53 PM
To: <[email protected]>, <[email protected]>, <[email protected]>,
<[email protected]>, <[email protected]>, <[email protected]>,
<[email protected]>, <[email protected]>
cc:
Subject: EPSA Motion for Cease and Desist
Attached is EPSA's emergency motion for an immediate issuance of a cease and
desist order for the Cal ISO to implement price caps, filed today. Also
attached is EPSA's press release regarding the filing.
If you will be sending an individual letter to FERC Chairman James J. Hoecker
supporting EPSA's arguments, please be sure to file the letter in the docket
and servce the service list (approx. 200+ individuals). If you need help
obtaining a copy of the service list, please contact Jackie Gallagher at
202-789-7200 or [email protected].
Attachments
- cal cease and desist.doc
- Oct30calpricecaps.doc | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
David,
Here's the information for the Portland database:
Machine name: napdx-sql1
user id: gasintranet
password: fundamentals
The Access database I created is located at: O:\\fundy_ops\west desk\generation database\power_link_database.mdb
The qry_curtailments is the query i'm currently using (although it only has fields for today and yesterday, and i think i need more). The tables for the query are dbo_LkpOUT_PlantCharacteristics and dbo_LkpOUT_PlantOutage.
In general, I think I need two tables. One needs to show each plant and the other needs to summarize the outages by region and fuel type (both in the Plant table). I don't really have a query that prepares the data for the summary table. the other two queries in the Access database are a start. The attached Excel file has two sheets with what I would ideally like the report to look like. It might be good to group the first table by region and then fuel type as well. When you have a chance to look this stuff over, I'd be happy to discuss it further. Thanks.
Mat | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Start Date: 4/18/01; HourAhead hour: 13; No ancillary schedules awarded. No
variances detected.
LOG MESSAGES:
PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001041813.txt | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Attached is a marked draft of my fairly quick attempt to revise John's draft
cover letter to help mitigate Japanese law/regulatory risks and separate EJ
from Enron Online, an offshore business initiative at this point.
Paul: Please review and add your comments.
Susan: Please review from a tax perspective, and provide your comments.
Alan
To: Nicholas O'Day/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT,
[email protected]
cc: Joseph P Hirl/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Alan Aronowitz@ECT
Subject: EnronOnline Letter
Per our discussion earlier today, attached is a draft of the letter we
propose to send out from Joe Hirl on Enron Japan letterhead during the week
of May 8. | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Kay:
The tour we are conducting next week is designed to provide Livingston County
officials with a first hand view of the Lincoln Energy Center in Manhattan,
IL.
The scope of work which Piper Marbury (Mark Gershon, Karen Way) is working
under is described below:
1. Interface with Livingston officials to determine appropriate invite list
from Zoning Board of Appeals, Plan Commision, and County Board
2. Attend the tour on 8/22 (approx 4 hours) - Presentation to attendees,
site tour, bus ride to and from Livingston
3. Handle follow-up issues/questions from Livingston officials
We conducted a similar tour for the Kendall County officals in June and it
was very beneficial in terms of obtaining our local zoning and other
approvals. We are obviously hoping for a similar result with the Livingston
County group.
Call me to discuss.
Fred
From: Kay Mann @ ENRON 08/14/2000 06:36 PM
To: Fred Mitro/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rusty Stevens/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:
Subject: Livingston County Tour of Lincoln Energy Center
Hi guys,
I want to make sure that you are comfortable with whatever services are being
provided by Piper Rudnick, so that there won't be any surprises when the bill
comes in. Could you give me a brief outline of their scope?
Thanks,
Kay
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 08/14/2000 06:31
PM ---------------------------
"Gershon, Mark A. - CHI" <[email protected]> on 08/09/2000
05:48:44 PM
To: "Fred J. Mitro (E-mail)" <[email protected]>, "Rusty Stevens (E-mail)"
<[email protected]>, "Susan M. Landwehr (E-mail)" <[email protected]>,
"Kay Mann (E-mail)" <[email protected]>, "Jim Murphy (E-mail)"
<[email protected]>
cc: "Townsend, Christopher J. - CHI" <[email protected]>,
"Novak, Theodore J. - CHI" <[email protected]>, "Shindler,
Donald A. - CHI" <[email protected]>, "Way, Karen S. - CHI"
<[email protected]>
Subject: Livingston County Tour of Lincoln Energy Center
Mason Hall, Livingston County Coordinator, has confirmed that the County
Agriculture and Zoning Committee, other key County officials and staff would
like to join us for a tour of the Lincoln Energy Center on August 22, 2000.
Current plan is for a bus to pick up participants in Pontiac at 10 a.m. and
to return by approximately 2:30 to 3:00. Lunch will be served at the site.
Mason anticipates approximately 15 to 20 participants. We are also planning
to invite certain Township and City of Pontiac officials and should consider
other potential invitees including neighbors and other politicians.
Mark A. Gershon
Piper Marbury Rudnick & Wolfe
Phone: (312) 368-2127
Fax: (312) 630-5338
[email protected]
____________________________________________________________________________
The e-mail address and domain name of the sender changed on November 1,
1999. Please update your records.
The information contained in this communication may be confidential, is
intended only for the use of the recipient named above, and may be legally
privileged. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you
are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, or copying of this
communication, or any of its contents, is strictly prohibited. If you have
received this communication in error, please re-send this communication to
the sender and delete the original message and any copy of it from your
computer system.
Thank you.
For more information about Piper Marbury Rudnick & Wolfe, please visit us at
http://www.piperrudnick.com/
____________________________________________________________________________ | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
My current golf game!
Ben
---------------------- Forwarded by Benjamin Rogers/HOU/ECT on 03/28/2000
03:23 PM ---------------------------
"D.Michael Gioffre, DDS" <[email protected]> on 03/28/2000 11:38:34 AM
To: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected]
cc: (bcc: Benjamin Rogers/HOU/ECT)
Subject: Story of my golf life!
>
> It was a sunny Saturday morning on the course, and I was beginning my
> pre-shot routine, visualizing my upcoming shot, concentrating on my swing
> mechanics, when a voice came over the clubhouse loudspeaker:
>
> "Would the gentleman on the women's' tee back up to the men's' tee,
> please!!"
>
> I was still deep into my routine, seemingly impervious to the
> interruption.
>
> Again the announcement, " Would the MAN on the WOMEN'S' tee kindly back
up
> to the men's' tee!"
>
> I simply ignored the guy and kept concentrating, when once more he
> yelled ut, "Would the man on the women's' tee back up to the men's tee,
> PLEASE!!!"
>
> Finally, I stopped, turned, looked through the clubhouse window, directly
> at the person with the microphone, and shouted back,
>
> "Would the person in the clubhouse kindly shut the f... up, and let me
> play
> my second shot?"
______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
thanks kate! sorry about that, i didn't pull each one up -i just assumed
that they were all like the 1st two that i did check on. thanks for your
help!
Kate Symes @ ECT 04/02/2001 12:17 PM
To: Kimberly Hundl/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Sharen Cason/HOU/ECT@ECT, Amy
Smith/ENRON@enronXgate
cc: Lester Rawson/PDX/ECT@ECT
Subject: Unit Contingent Deals
I spoke with Les about these deals, and he told me he'd like unit contingent
SALES confirmed, and unit contingent BUYS not confirmed. I sorted through
these deal numbers and changed the buys to not be confirmed, and it looks
like most of the sales already have the unit name in the comments section.
Following is the list of deals you sent me and notes on what I did:
562211 - changed to "no confirm"
564613 - changed to "no confirm"
566060 - unit name is in comments section
566062 - unit name is in comments section
566069 - unit name is in comments section
566071 - unit name is in comments section
566077 - unit is Willamette Albany Paper Mill/comments section is full - ???
566078 - unit name is in comments section
556116 - unit is LV Cogen/added to comments
554737 - unit is LV Cogen/added to comments
Les and I also talked about creating a master list of delivery points and
their respective unit names for future reference. Please let me know if you
think that would be helpful. In the meantime, feel free to send these lists
to me.
Thanks,
Kate
Kimberly Hundl@ENRON
04/02/2001 07:29 AM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc: Sharen Cason/HOU/ECT@ECT, Amy Smith/ENRON@enronXgate
Subject: More Unit Contingent Deals
Hi Kate,
The following are also unit contingent deals that we aren't able to confirm
unless we have a unit name.
562211
564613
566060
566062
566069
566071
566077
566078
Thanks!
Kim
---------------------- Forwarded by Kimberly Hundl/Corp/Enron on 04/02/2001
09:26 AM ---------------------------
Kimberly Hundl
04/02/2001 09:11 AM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc: Sharen Cason/HOU/ECT@ECT, Amy Smith/ENRON@enronXgate
Subject: Unit Contingent Deals #554737 & 556116
Hi Kate!
Hope you had a good weekend!
We need to know the unit name on these two unit contingent deals for Salt
River Project.
Thanks!
Kim | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
How is Gail?
Debra Perlingiere
Enron North America Corp.
Legal Department
1400 Smith Street, EB 3885
Houston, Texas 77002
[email protected]
Phone 713-853-7658
Fax 713-646-3490 | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
The summary for the Las Vegas LM 6000 turbines is attached. This reflects
GE's final comments on the numbers (both performance and dollars), and is
ready to deliver after attaching the following:
(1) I have overnighted to Ron's attention the 1" or so stack of exhibits
from the master contract. Pricing and spares have been deleted.
(2) The payment schedule for the 4 machines. Kent Shoemaker said that Ben
J. should have the payment schedule.
Bill: The performance numbers have been changed from those in the master
agreement to adjust for altitude and the decrease in water injection. Please
confirm that these are correct.
P.S. Sheila is right--you just have to stay on these guys until you get what
you want out of them. Kind of like bull riding, I guess . . . . | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Jason,
Following are my comments in blackline on the above. Hopefully you will be
able to distinquish my comments from the counterparty. To help you
distinquish, my comments are in sections, 1(c), 3(e) and 6(second
paragraph). Let me know if you have any questions.
Clement
"JASON PETERS" <[email protected]>
08/22/2000 01:06 PM
To: <[email protected]>
cc: <[email protected]>, <[email protected]>
Subject: Enron Corp. Guaranty - Harvard ISDA
Clement,
Attached for your review, please find a blacklined copy of the Enron Corp.
Guaranty Form for Financial Swaps marked to show changes requested by the
above-referenced counterparty. After you have had an opportunity to review
the attachment, please forward your comments to me. My fax is 713-238-7129
and my e-mail is [email protected].
Thanks,
Jason
- Blacklin.DOC | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
<http://images.sportsline.com/images/newsletter/ee-header1.gif>
Win big prizes with Megasports.com! <http://ww1.sportsline.com/links/click.cgi?53&1&4806796&mail.megasports.com/cgi-bin/nph-t.pl?U=56&SESSION=Sportslinedrop3_2002_1_29&Other=headerimage>
Win $1,000,000! <http://ww1.sportsline.com/links/click.cgi?53&1&4806796&mail.megasports.com/cgi-bin/nph-t.pl?U=71&SESSION=Sportslinedrop2_2001_12_28&Other=headertab>
Click here for more winners! <http://ww1.sportsline.com/links/click.cgi?53&1&4806796&mail.megasports.com/cgi-bin/nph-t.pl?U=48&SESSION=Sportslinedrop2_2001_12_28&OTHER=winnergraphic>
Click here to see more winners! <http://ww1.sportsline.com/links/click.cgi?53&1&4806796&mail.megasports.com/cgi-bin/nph-t.pl?U=48&SESSION=Sportslinedrop2_2001_12_28&OTHER=winnertext>
Its Time for the Big Game at Megasports.com! <http://ww1.sportsline.com/links/click.cgi?53&1&4806796&mail.megasports.com/cgi-bin/nph-t.pl?U=71&SESSION=Sportslinedrop2_2001_12_28&Other=milliontextheader>
Megasports.com presents to you our special Big Game edition <http://ww1.sportsline.com/links/click.cgi?53&1&4806796&mail.megasports.com/cgi-bin/nph-t.pl?U=71&SESSION=Sportslinedrop2_2001_12_28&Other=milliontext01> of our weekly Million Dollar Contest <http://ww1.sportsline.com/links/click.cgi?53&1&4806796&mail.megasports.com/cgi-bin/nph-t.pl?U=71&SESSION=Sportslinedrop2_2001_12_28&Other=milliontext02>.
Answer 20 questions <http://ww1.sportsline.com/links/click.cgi?53&1&4806796&mail.megasports.com/cgi-bin/nph-t.pl?U=71&SESSION=Sportslinedrop2_2001_12_28&Other=milliontextbullet01>
Win $1,000,000 <http://ww1.sportsline.com/links/click.cgi?53&1&4806796&mail.megasports.com/cgi-bin/nph-t.pl?U=71&SESSION=Sportslinedrop2_2001_12_28&Other=milliontextbullet02>
No frills, no gimmicks, no fees. Its totally FREE! <http://ww1.sportsline.com/links/click.cgi?53&1&4806796&mail.megasports.com/cgi-bin/nph-t.pl?U=71&SESSION=Sportslinedrop2_2001_12_28&Other=milliontextbullet03>
You give us 20 correct answers, and we will give you $1,000,000! Even if you dont get it all right, you can still win Fabulous Prizes! <http://ww1.sportsline.com/links/click.cgi?53&1&4806796&mail.megasports.com/cgi-bin/nph-t.pl?U=48&SESSION=Sportslinedrop2_2001_12_28&OTHER=milliontext03>
So this week, it doesnt matter who wins the Superbowl, you can still win big with Megasports.com! <http://ww1.sportsline.com/links/click.cgi?53&1&4806796&mail.megasports.com/cgi-bin/nph-t.pl?U=56&SESSION=Sportslinedrop3_2002_1_29&Other=milliontext04>
Click here to win now! <http://ww1.sportsline.com/links/click.cgi?53&1&4806796&mail.megasports.com/cgi-bin/nph-t.pl?U=71&SESSION=Sportslinedrop2_2001_12_28&Other=milliontextbottom>
_____
FREE Daily Pick 4 <http://ww1.sportsline.com/links/click.cgi?53&1&4806796&mail.megasports.com/cgi-bin/nph-t.pl?U=55&SESSION=Sportslinedrop2_2001_12_28&Other=pick4texttoplink>
The Hottest game on the web today! The Daily Pick 4. Where else can you win $2,000 a day? Its too easy, every day all you have to do is give us 4 answers and you can win up to $2,000 a day! Theres a different set of questions everyday which means that there is a chance to win $2,000 every day!
Pick 4 to win now! <http://ww1.sportsline.com/links/click.cgi?53&1&4806796&mail.megasports.com/cgi-bin/nph-t.pl?U=55&SESSION=Sportslinedrop2_2001_12_28&Other=pick4textbottomlink>
Pick 4 to win! <http://ww1.sportsline.com/links/click.cgi?53&1&4806796&mail.megasports.com/cgi-bin/nph-t.pl?U=55&SESSION=Sportslinedrop2_2001_12_28&Other=girlpic>
_____
Win $1,000,000 <http://ww1.sportsline.com/links/click.cgi?53&1&4806796&mail.megasports.com/cgi-bin/nph-t.pl?U=71&SESSION=Sportslinedrop2_2001_12_28&Other=bottomtextlink> | Daily Pick 4 <http://ww1.sportsline.com/links/click.cgi?53&1&4806796&mail.megasports.com/cgi-bin/nph-t.pl?U=55&SESSION=Sportslinedrop2_2001_12_28&Other=bottomtextlink> | FAQ's <http://ww1.sportsline.com/links/click.cgi?53&1&4806796&mail.megasports.com/cgi-bin/nph-t.pl?U=68&SESSION=Sportslinedrop2_2001_12_28&Other=bottomtextlink> | About Megasports.com <http://ww1.sportsline.com/links/click.cgi?53&1&4806796&mail.megasports.com/cgi-bin/nph-t.pl?U=69&SESSION=Sportslinedrop2_2001_12_28&Other=bottomtextlink> | Privacy Statement <http://ww1.sportsline.com/links/click.cgi?53&1&4806796&mail.megasports.com/cgi-bin/nph-t.pl?U=70&SESSION=Sportslinedrop2_2001_12_28&Other=bottomtextlink>
You received this e-mail because you registered on CBS SportsLine.com. If you do not want to receive these special e-mail offers you can unsubscribe by clicking this link: http://www.sportsline.com/u/newsletters/[email protected] <http://ww1.sportsline.com/links/click.cgi?53&1&4806796&/u/newsletters/[email protected]>. You are subscribed as [{([email protected])}] .
Although we are sending this e-mail to you, SportsLine.com is not responsible for the advertisers' content and makes no warranties or guarantees about the products or services advertised. SportsLine.com takes your privacy seriously. To learn more about SportsLine.com's use of personal information, please read our Privacy Statement at http://cbs.sportsline.com/u/userservices/privacy.htm <http://ww1.sportsline.com/links/click.cgi?53&1&4806796&/u/userservices/privacy.htm>
<http://images.sportsline.com/images/newsletter/ee-footer.gif>
<http://ww1.sportsline.com/links/click.cgi?53&1&4806796&/images/tracker/open_email.gif> | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Holden,
I have a message that you have a problem to insert deals with Deal Blotter
Try to set up your Defaults under "Defaults" menu and if you still have
a problem you can give me a call.
Thanks,
Kroum Kroumov
713 853-9980 | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Dear Power Outage Database Customer,
Attached you will find an excel document. The outages contained within are forced or rescheduled outages. Your daily delivery will still contain
these outages.
In addition to the two excel documents, there is a dbf file that is formatted like your daily deliveries you receive nightly. This will enable
you to load the data into your regular database. Any questions please let me know. Thanks.
Greg Elliott
IIR, Inc.
713-783-5147 x 3481
[email protected]
THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS E-MAIL IS LEGALLY PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION INTENDED ONLY FOR THE USE OF THE INDIVIDUAL OR
ENTITY NAMED ABOVE. YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED THAT ANY DISSEMINATION, DISTRIBUTION, OR COPY OF THIS E-MAIL TO UNAUTHORIZED ENTITIES IS STRICTLY
PROHIBITED. IF YOU HAVE RECEIVED THIS E-MAIL IN ERROR, PLEASE DELETE IT.
- OUTAGE.dbf
- 091901.xls
- 091901R.xls | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Good Morning!
We have excess of $4,498,358.00 with EDF Man. I called and talked with Paul this morning and he said that he could not confirm the wire for today as of yet.
I'll let you know asap.
Thanks!
gg | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Here's the link:
http://quicken.excite.com/investments/news_center/article/printer.dcg?story=/n
ews/stories/dj/20010320/ON20010320000069.htm
Sue Mara
Enron Corp.
Tel: (415) 782-7802
Fax:(415) 782-7854 | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Thanks for the clarification.
Dale
Jason R Williams@ENRON
01/17/2001 02:42 PM
To: Dale Neuner/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Debbie R Brackett/HOU/ECT@ECT, Andrea Crump/NA/Enron@ENRON, Douglas
Fuehne/NA/Enron@ENRON
Subject: Re: Credit Verification
Dale -
Yes. Please hold off on granting access until you hear from us. At first
glance, this appears to be a good candidate, but we would like to run all the
appropriate traps before approval.
Jay
Dale Neuner @ ECT 01/17/2001 02:21 PM
To: Debbie R Brackett/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Andrea Crump/NA/Enron@ENRON, Jason R Williams/NA/Enron@ENRON, Douglas
Fuehne/NA/Enron@ENRON
Subject: Re: Credit Verification
Debbie -
Does 'tentatively approved' mean that we should not grant Tenaska access
until we hear from you tomorrow?
Dale
To: Andrea Crump/NA/Enron@ENRON
cc: Jason R Williams/NA/Enron@ENRON, Douglas Fuehne/NA/Enron@ENRON, Dale
Neuner/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: Credit Verification
Andrea,
Cross Timbers Energy Services-approved for view only.
Tenaska tentatively approved -pending updated review by Credit. We will
advise by Thursday pm if execution is disallowed.
Andrea Crump@ENRON
01/17/2001 01:15 PM
To: Debbie R Brackett/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Jason R Williams/NA/Enron@ENRON, Douglas Fuehne/NA/Enron@ENRON, Dale
Neuner/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Credit Verification
Hello,
Per my conversation with Doug, I would like to confirm the following credit
approvals.
- Cross Timbers Energy Services, Inc has been rejected by credit, but has
been approved for "view" access only.
- Tenaska Marketing Ventures has been approved by credit.
Please reply to confirm, and I will process accordingly.
Thank you,
Andrea
Product Control Group - CL
x54420 | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
The report named: East P/L Totals <http://trv.corp.enron.com/linkFromExcel.asp?report_cd=1&report_name=East+P/L+Totals&category_cd=1&category_name=EAST&toc_hide=1&sTV1=1&TV1Exp=Y¤t_efct_date=10/03/2001>, published as of 10/03/2001 is now available for viewing on the website. | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
We talked to benefits; they tell us they will get back to us with an answer tomorrow.
Thanks,
Valley
57925 | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
SCIENTECH's IssueAlert
Today's IssueAlert Sponsors:
[IMAGE] SCIENTECH is currently interviewing 1,500 utilities on CIS/CRM and customer care in the United States and Canada to determine: The leading software providers Drivers of utility technology decisions Analysis of license sales versus ASP sales New market opportunities Growing/shrinking software markets Download a sample prospectus for an introduction to this new survey at: http://secure.scientech.com/specialpages/Multi_Client.asp and contact Jon Brock at 505-244-7607 for more details.
[IMAGE]
[IMAGE]
October 19, 2001
Private Investors Align to Upgrade California's Path 15;
Project Causes New State / Federal Conflicts
By Will McNamara
Director, Electric Industry Analysis
[IMAGE]
[News item from Reuters] The federal government has reached a deal with a coalition of energy companies to build a transmission line in central California under a $300-million project to relieve a chronic bottleneck in moving electricity supplies between the northern and southern parts of the state. Construction on the so-called Path 15 project, which was announced by Energy Secretary Spencer Abraham, will begin in the spring of 2003 and could be completed by as early as summer 2004.
Analysis: The California energy crisis, which clearly subsided over the summer of 2001 due to new generation that came online in the state, mild weather patterns and conservation efforts, is generally considered the result of a severe supply / demand imbalance. While this may be true, what often gets overlooked is that deficient transmission capacity in the state-the lines that actually transport power from point A to point B-also played a primary role in creating the tremendous instability of California's energy market. This problem still persists today, and as California heads into the winter season concerns about power reliability once again are surfacing. The Department of Energy (DOE) has stepped in to correct the problem by overseeing a massive upgrade to California's main transmission line. While this is a positive step, the upgrade creates a new level of state / federal disputes for California and also puts ownership of the new transmission line into the hands of private companies, which creates a whole new set of potential conflicts.
Amid a long list of uncertain ramifications of the Path 15 upgrade, there are some things that we know for sure. First, Path 15, which is owned by Pacific Gas & Electric Co., is a 90-mile high-voltage section of transmission capacity that essentially carries power between Northern and Southern California. During the peak of the energy crisis in California, Path 15 became rather clogged and suffered from bottlenecks (points at which transmission could not transport high volumes of power). This pre-empted any transport of power from Southern California (and Arizona and Mexico) to the north, which resulted in rolling blackouts in San Francisco and other Northern California cities. As noted, these bottleneck problems remain and are particularly acute during times of peak power demand, which is obviously a concern as winter approaches.
The deficiency of the California transmission systems is arguably the last piece of the puzzle that remains toward bringing stability back to the state's energy market. Ironically, power supply is no longer seen as an imminent problem. New reports from the California ISO indicate that the state should have operating reserves of between 2,000 and 2,200 MW this winter, which has been deemed sufficient to stave off problems that plagued the previous winter season. However, the report on the state's transmission system is not as positive. If the Northwest continues to experience a drought, then Northern California will still need to import more power from the south. Heavy dependence on the strained Path 15 could once again cause reliability problems for California.
Thus, deficiencies along Path 15 can be seen as a symptom of larger problems that continue to plague California, and problems that have been the focus of both state and federal intervention for months, if not years. In fact, there is a history here that is worth noting, especially as it relates to federal / state jurisdiction. When President Bush released his national energy plan in April of this year, he directed the DOE to explore efforts that would relieve congestion along Path 15. Following through with this order, Energy Secretary Abraham issued a request for proposals that elicited responses from 13 companies interested in participating in the expansion of Path 15. The current contract, which will add a new line to the existing Path 15, is the result of that previous directive.
At present, it appears that PG?Corp. (NYSE: PCG), the parent of Pacific Gas & Electric Co., and six other companies have signed on to financially support the upgrade. The six other companies that will spearhead the project are the Transmission Agency of Northern California, Trans-Elect, Inc., Kinder Morgan Power Co., PG?National Energy Group, Williams Energy Marketing and Trading, and the Western Area Power Administration (WAPA), a federal agency within the DOE that sells electricity from water projects in 15 western states and operates 17,000 miles of transmission lines.
Presently, Path 15 connects the Bay Area in Northern California to two of the state's largest generation facilities-Pacific Gas & Electric Co.'s Diablo Canyon nuclear facility and Duke Energy's Morro Bay natural-gas power plant. The upgrade will reportedly include a new 500-kilovolt line that would boost transmission by about 1,500 MW from these two plants. Further, when the upgrade is finished in 2004, Path 15 should be able to carry a total of 5,400 MW of power.
Of course, the first question that I asked was: Who is going to pay for the upgrade? The way it appears at this writing is that the WAPA will retain 10-percent ownership of the new line for its role as project manager and for acquiring the rights from property owners to hold the power line. The remaining 90 percent will be owned by the private companies that are devoting different amounts of capital to fund the upgrade. The exact percentages of investment (and ownership) have yet to be defined, but should be revealed in a subsequent plan outlined in the next 90 days. You may ask why these companies would want to participate in a transmission upgrade in California. The answer is that the companies will be able to recoup their investments through fees charged to use the new transmission line. This could result in a hefty payoff for the companies investing in the project, who presumably anticipate that California will remain a high-demand state through which huge amounts of power will need to be transported.
As I mentioned, there are some potential conflicts that might arise with this upgrade plan. First, there is the issue of potential state / federal regulatory conflicts. Presently, state governments have jurisdiction over power line siting. Thus, the California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) had already been pursuing its own upgrade plan for Path 15 prior to Secretary Abraham's call for private-company bids. Specifically, the CPUC had directed Pacific Gas & Electric Co., which it regulates, to upgrade the bottleneck spots along Path 15. As seems to be a growing occurrence, we may find that there is a state / federal jurisdictional dispute regarding which regulatory body has the authority to direct and manage transmission upgrades in California. Gov. Gray Davis and the CPUC certainly seem to believe that it is the state's prerogative, and have issued strong criticisms over the DOE's venture into this territory. However, in his energy plan, President Bush seemed to support a change in policy that would allow federal officials to obtain transmission rights of way as a way to increase national transmission capacity. If there is indeed a dispute between the CPUC and the DOE, it is not known if federal policy would supersede state policy in this area. In any event, representatives from Trans-Elect, one of the participating companies, have said that balancing the various interests among federal and state (and public and private) interests will be one of the key challenges for the upgrade project. Note that Trans-Elect was the company that had unsuccessfully attempted to purchase the transmission assets of Southern California Edison earlier this year.
Also viewed by some as a potential conflict with the DOE's upgrade plan for Path 15 are the difficulties that could arise with private ownership of a major piece of California's transmission grid. The DOE-sponsored upgrade, unlike the one that the CPUC has directed, reportedly would not be subject to review or approval by either the California ISO or the CPUC. Further, because the companies participating in the upgrade will own a portion of the new line, these companies will be able to charge "tolls" to the power marketers that use the lines to transport power. This is most likely a point of contention for California officials, especially Gov. Gray Davis, who has sought state ownership of existing transmission lines and is not too keen on private-company ownership of generation facilities in the state. The positive side of this issue is that, according to the DOE, the bids from private contracts enable the upgrade of Path 15 to proceed without any increase to "either the taxpayers or ratepayers of California or the United States of America."
As a side note, in addition to Path 15 the CPUC is also proceeding with a new transmission line in Southern California, known as the Valley-Rainbow Interconnect transmission line. Although the timetable has been delayed until 2005, San Diego Gas & Electric is proceeding with a 500,000-volt transmission line that would connect Southern California Edison's Valley Substation near Romoland, Calif., with a future substation to be located in the Rainbow, Calif. area, just south of the Riverside-San Diego county line. The new transmission line would provide a second interconnection between SDG&E's and SCE's transmission systems. The first interconnection is at the San Onofre Substation near San Clemente, Calif. The project is designed to deliver approximately 1,000 MW.
Moreover, the expansion of Path 15 is a necessary step to help California lower its risk for further reliability problems. Due to generation development, the imminent threat of the California energy crisis has diminished, but the state is still wrestling with an equally important mix of risk factors. The state government still has its hand in power purchases, which represents a huge part of the state's energy market. The state has accrued $12.5 billion in debt to buy power for the state's utilities, the recovery for which remains an unresolved issue. While Gov. Davis has preferred to increase the state's role in California's energy infrastructure, this new DOE-sponsored project on Path 15 puts ownership of transmission assets into the hands of private companies.
An archive list of previous IssueAlerts is available atwww.scientech.com
We encourage our readers to contact us with their comments. We look forward to hearing from you. Nancy Spring Reach thousands of utility analysts and decision makers every day. Your company can schedule a sponsorship of IssueAlert by contacting Jane Pelz . Advertising opportunities are also available on our Website.
Our staff is comprised of leading energy experts with diverse backgrounds in utility generation, transmission & distribution, retail markets, new technologies, I/T, renewable energy, regulatory affairs, community relations and international issues. Contact [email protected] or call Nancy Spring at 1-505-244-7613.
SCIENTECH is pleased to provide you with your free, daily IssueAlert. Let us know if we can help you with in-depth analyses or any other SCIENTECH information products. If you would like to refer a colleague to receive our free, daily IssueAlerts, please reply to this e-mail and include their full name and e-mail address or register directly on our site. If you no longer wish to receive this daily e-mail, and you are currently a registered subscriber to IssueAlert via SCIENTECH's website, please visit http://secure.scientech.com/account/ to unsubscribe. Otherwise, please send an e-mail to to IssueAlert , with "Delete IA Subscription" in the subject line.
SCIENTECH's IssueAlerts(SM) are compiled based on the independent analysis of SCIENTECH consultants. The opinions expressed in SCIENTECH's IssueAlerts are not intended to predict financial performance of companies discussed, or to be the basis for investment decisions of any kind. SCIENTECH's sole purpose in publishing its IssueAlerts is to offer an independent perspective regarding the key events occurring in the energy industry, based on its long-standing reputation as an expert on energy issues. Copyright 2001. SCIENTECH, Inc. All rights reserved. | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Start Date: 12/20/01; HourAhead hour: 24; No ancillary schedules awarded. No variances detected.
LOG MESSAGES:
PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final Schedules\2001122024.txt | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
---------------------- Forwarded by Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT on 03/08/2001
12:28 PM ---------------------------
Enron North America Corp.
From: Garrick Hill 03/08/2001 12:02 PM
To: Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT, James Armstrong/HOU/ECT@ECT, Christopher
Coffman/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc: Charles Ward/Corp/Enron@ENRON
Subject: Cleburne Gas
Our location for this meeting has moved to 32C2.
---------------------- Forwarded by Garrick Hill/HOU/ECT on 03/08/2001 12:01
PM ---------------------------
Enron North America Corp.
From: Tina Rode 03/07/2001 05:09 PM
To: Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT, James Armstrong/HOU/ECT@ECT, Christopher
Coffman/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc: Garrick Hill/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Cleburne Gas
Please plan on attending a meeting regarding Cleburne Gas on Thursday March 8
at 2:00-3:00pm in conference room 3143A.
Thanks,
Tina | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Sorry that I forgot you guys!
---------------------- Forwarded by Dana Davis/HOU/ECT on 07/14/2000 03:19 PM
---------------------------
Enron North America Corp.
From: Dana Davis 07/14/2000 03:18 PM
To: Laynie East/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lisa King/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lisa
Best/Corp/Enron@Enron, Rufino Doroteo/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kortney Brown/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Adarsh Vakharia/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kevin Jolly/HOU/ECT@ECT, Angeles
Beltri/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stacy Hardy/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Rosalyn
Lum/Corp/Enron@Enron, Cindy Stokes/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brian
Schwertner/NA/Enron@Enron, Brad Carey/NA/Enron@Enron
cc: Hope Vargas/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Leaving Early
FYI:
If it's ok with everyone's needs, I would like to leave @4pm. If you think
you will need my assistance past the 4 o'clock hour just let me know; I'll
be more than willing to stay. | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Here is the draft forwarded to Dynegy | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Electricity Deregulation is coming to Texas!
What a great way to start off the New Year ) to be able to choose your
electricity provider, which could mean potential savings for you and your
family on your electric bill. As you know, Enron has been a leader in
lobbying for deregulation and a consumer,s right to choose energy providers.
For the first time in our state,s history, 5 percent of Texas households will
have this golden opportunity. The NewPower Company (NewPower), which is
approximately 45 percent owned by Enron, was recently formed to provide
energy and energy-related services to residential customers in deregulating
energy markets across America, including Texas. For a limited time,
Houston-based employees will be eligible to participate in NewPower,s pilot
program offering their deregulated electric service.
Be Among the First to Participate:
Enrollment with NewPower begins March 12. Also, watch for a special Enron
Employees Exclusive offer on your desk March 12. If you would like more
information about NewPower, visit the company's web site at www.newpower.com
Disclaimers:
Any contract for goods or services that is entered into by an Enron employee
with respect to the NewPower program shall be solely between NewPower and
such employee. Enron assumes no obligation on behalf of NewPower and makes
no representations, warranties, or guaranties with respect to NewPower, or
any goods or services offered or provided by NewPower. | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
just check with bob late in the morning
Sara Shackleton
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3801a
Houston, Texas 77002
713-853-5620 (phone)
713-646-3490 (fax)
[email protected]
----- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 02/14/2001 06:14 PM -----
Robert Bruce@ENRON
Sent by: Robert Bruce@ENRON
02/14/2001 10:55 AM
To: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: EGM Monthly Legal Report for Feb 2001
I will -- fyi, I am expecting today or tomorrow an explanation from Billy
Lemmons on my involvement in formulation of the business plan; am awaiting
this before I revise the agenda. If I don't hear from Billy by tomorrow
morning I will send a revised agenda at that time -- Bob
Robert E. Bruce
Senior Counsel
Enron North America Corp.
T (713) 345-7780
F (713) 646-3393
[email protected]
Sara Shackleton@ECT
02/14/2001 10:41 AM
To: Robert Bruce/NA/Enron@Enron
cc: Kaye Ellis/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: EGM Monthly Legal Report for Feb 2001
Bob: Could you please forward changes to the Ag section to Kaye? Thanks.
Sara
Sara Shackleton
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3801a
Houston, Texas 77002
713-853-5620 (phone)
713-646-3490 (fax)
[email protected]
----- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 02/14/2001 10:40 AM -----
Alan Aronowitz
02/13/2001 06:51 PM
To: Daniel R Rogers/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Coralina
Rivera/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Ned E
Crady/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Nancy
Corbet/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, John Viverito/Corp/Enron@Enron,
Matthias Lee/SIN/ECT@ECT, Michael A Robison/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert
Bruce/NA/Enron@Enron, Brent Hendry/NA/Enron@Enron, Lou Stoler/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert Quick/LON/ECT@ECT, Wayne
Gresham/HOU/ECT@ECT, Justin Boyd/LON/ECT@ECT, Rahul Saxena/LON/ECT@ECT
cc: Legal Temp 3/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: EGM Monthly Legal Report for Feb 2001
Please provide to me by e-mail by Thursday of this week your suggested
changes to the January 2001 Monthly Report, so that we can issue the February
2001Monthly Report by the end of this week. Thanks for your attention to this
matter.
Regards, Alan | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Slow browser may need to wait 15 seconds for your email to appear, then scroll to view.
mailto:[email protected]
to unsubscribe enerfaxdaily as: [email protected] forward to [email protected]
<IFRAME src=http://www.enerfaxdaily.com width=700 height=7600></IFRAME>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>If your email does not support this web
version, please subscribe to the free text version by writing <A
href="mailto:[email protected]">[email protected]</A>
Please visit our website to view today's gas and power prices and news by
clicking <A
href="http://www.enerfax.com">http://www.enerfax.com</A></FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
</BODY></HTML>
If you received this in error or no longer wish to subscribe click this link mailto:[email protected] or forward to [email protected] | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Title: Extending EU Gas Guidelines to Central and Eastern Europe
URL: http://www20.cera.com/eprofile?u=35&m=2184
Overview: A comprehensive reform of gas legislation in Central and Eastern
Europe is bringing the region in line with the European Union,s Gas
Directive. This is true both for the countries expected to enter the Union by
2004)05*Czech Republic, Estonia, Hungary, Poland, and Slovenia--and for
candidates whose entry is not scheduled before the end of the
decade--Bulgaria, Latvia, Lithuania, Romania, and Slovakia. In CERA,s view
current developments regarding the establishment of a legal framework for the
internal gas market in Eastern and Central Europe look promising from an
investor,s point of view.
The candidate countries presented a review of progress made in the
implementation of the EU Gas Directive during a two-day workshop held by the
European Commission and the World Bank in Paris in November.
Many of these countries have been reforming their energy industries
throughout the 1990s as part of their transition to a market economy. The
results have been mixed, particularly in the utility industries. The 1998 Gas
Directive (adopted in August 2000) now offers a compelling incentive for EU
candidate countries to transform their gas industries, while providing a road
map to guide them.
The critical points relevant to harmonization between the European Union and
candidate countries include the following:
* Legal framework and regulation. The legal framework is the cornerstone of
enlargement and the yardstick of harmonization in Europe. As a result, in all
candidate countries in 1999)2000 energy laws were either updated or newly
established along the principles spelled out in the Gas Directive. Regulatory
bodies have been created by law and are operating in every country, although
issues of staffing, financial autonomy, and independence from political
influence are not uniformly resolved.
* Third-party access (TPA) and long-term take-or-pay contracts. All candidate
countries agree that TPA is a key to market competition. Therefore, all have
adopted it or intend to do so in their new legislation. Although the
Commission favors regulated TPA, the specific approaches to TPA enforcement
in the candidate countries remain unclear in some cases. In particular, the
implementation of TPA will have to address the issue of long-term take-or-pay
contracts with Russia that were signed by all major domestic gas companies
and somewhat preempt competition. Russian gas is for the most part sold to
single, traditional state-owned operators that dominate their internal
markets. A balance will need to be struck between these incumbent dominant
players and the competitive environment. This is made more complicated by
their ownership of large volumes of Russian gas supplied in kind in exchange
for transit rights to West European customers. Article 25 of the directive
provides for !
a derogation to companies experiencing difficulties stemming from take-or-pay
obligations. This derogation would apply to the companies of candidate
countries with historical and commercial links with the Russian gas industry.
Furthermore, article 26 allows derogations to those member states with only
one major gas supplier, to those with an ++emerging [gas] market
status,,, or to those without a direct gas connection to the grid of another
member state. Most of the candidate countries would in principle be able to
call on one or more of these grounds for derogation when they join the
European Union.
* Price cross-subsidies. Residential gas tariffs are artificially low and are
financed partially through higher rates applied to industrial consumers. In
various countries, tariff increases and the phasing out of subsidies have
been scheduled, but such decisions remain politically sensitive to enforce.
This has recently been emphasized by high gas prices owing to the linkage of
imported gas to oil prices. All candidate countries have set legal frameworks
that include the phasing out of cross-subsidies as part of sector reform, but
the actual implementation will remain politically difficult. As Table 1
indicates, price rebalancing is already under way in most countries expected
to enter the European Union by mid-decade, but the legal framework itself
cannot guarantee the pace of reform. The same goes for candidate countries
that have only recently introduced EU-complying energy laws and whose entry
to the European Union is likely to happen in a longer time frame.
* Unbundling. Most countries understand that the unbundling of transmission
companies from their supply businesses is the second critical element of
liberalization. To date, unbundling the accounts of these two businesses is
all that has been adopted by the member states or in the candidate countries.
In the future, the Commission is likely to press all EU countries for legal
separation (&structural unbundling8) of the businesses, and candidate
countries will have to pursue their reform of the gas sector accordingly.
Table 1 gives an overview of the state of play in candidate countries. As the
table shows, the countries belonging to the second group have only very
recently undertaken the reform of the gas sector in accordance with the
Directive, whereas change had been introduced earlier in the countries
scheduled for the first wave.
**end**
Follow above URL for full report.
*********************************************************
Come Shoot the Rapids with us at CERAWeek2001, "Shooting the Rapids:
Strategies and Risks for the Energy Future" in Houston, February 12-16,
2001! For more information and to register, please visit
http://www20.cera.com/ceraweek/
*********************************************************
E-mail Category: Insight
CERA Knowledge Area(s): European Gas,
**********************************************************************
To make changes to your cera.com account go to:
http://www20.cera.com/client/updateaccount
Forgot your username and password? Go to:
http://www20.cera.com/client/forgot
This electronic message and attachments, if any, contain information
from Cambridge Energy Research Associates, Inc. (CERA) which is
confidential and may be privileged. Unauthorized disclosure, copying,
distribution or use of the contents of this message or any attachments,
in whole or in part, is strictly prohibited.
Terms of Use: http://www20.cera.com/tos
Questions/Comments: [email protected]
Copyright 2000. Cambridge Energy Research Associates | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
I am fine. Don't forget that I here only half day tomorrow.
Tom
-----Original Message-----
From: Vuittonet, Laura
Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 9:50 AM
To: Martin, Thomas A.
Subject: FW: Fire Warden Class
Tom, I am going to go to a Fire Warden Class today from 1:30 - 4:30 to become a Fire Warden for the new building. Is there anything you need me to do before I go to help you get packed up ... especially since you're working a half day tomorrow?
-----Original Message-----
From: Rangel, Ina
Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 9:19 AM
To: Vuittonet, Laura
Subject: RE: Fire Warden Class
Yes it is okay
-----Original Message-----
From: Vuittonet, Laura
Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 4:57 PM
To: Rangel, Ina
Subject: FW: Fire Warden Class
I can't remember if you replied or not, but is it okay for me to go to this class tomorrow? Do you think that Jessica will be back?
-----Original Message-----
From: Vuittonet, Laura
Sent: Tuesday, November 06, 2001 8:38 AM
To: Rangel, Ina
Subject: Fire Warden Class
Ina, I would like to take the Fire Warden Class on Thurs, Nov 15th from 1:30 - 4:30 pm. Please let me know if there is enough coverage on the phones so that I can go.
thanks,
Laura | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
---------------------- Forwarded by Sheila Glover/HOU/ECT on 07/06/2000 08:04
AM ---------------------------
Enron North America Corp.
From: Selena Reyes 07/06/2000 07:42 AM
To: Sheila Glover/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: SWAP Terms
FYI
Thanks,
Selena
---------------------- Forwarded by Selena Reyes/HOU/ECT on 07/06/2000 07:40
AM ---------------------------
Enron North America Corp.
From: Selena Reyes 06/29/2000 10:52 AM
To: Laurel Adams/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: SWAP Terms
Laurel,
Attached is a term sheet from Merrill Lynch on ENE stock that we traded
yesterday in swap on behalf of Corp. ML is requesting that someone sign the
term sheet. Can you forward this to legal and find out who would be the
right person to sign the term sheet. I think it may be of an urgent matter
b/c we are trading with them today.
Keep me posted.
Thanks,
Selena
---------------------- Forwarded by Selena Reyes/HOU/ECT on 06/29/2000 10:48
AM ---------------------------
"Barna, Peter (Equity Capital Markets)" <[email protected]> on
06/28/2000 05:14:46 PM
To: "'[email protected]'" <[email protected]>,
"'[email protected]'" <[email protected]>,
"'[email protected]'" <[email protected]>
cc: "Maanavi, Dariush (CICG-GEDNY)" <[email protected]>, "Lyons,
Maureen (CICG-GELPNY)" <[email protected]>
Subject: SWAP Terms
<<ENE_TRR-Swap_6_27_legal.doc>> <<ENE_6_28_swap.xls>>
John,
Attached is a termsheet and execution summary for the ENE swap entered into
today. If we dont get to 1mm shares by Friday we are happy to tranche the
swap based on the number of shares executed at that time. Please give me a
call if you have any questions or comments. We will give you a call in the
morning to discuss if you would like us to continue our hedging activity.
Thank you.
- ENE_TRR-Swap_6_27_legal.doc
- ENE_6_28_swap.xls | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Sheila: Per my voice mail, can you make headway with these two companies?
We have not heard back from either. I think that there needs to be a
commercial push. Please call if you have any questions or if I can help
further. Thanks. Sara | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Tim,
Can you authorize access to the west power site for Keith Holtz. He is our
Southern California basis trader and is under a two year contract.
On another note, is it my imagination or did the SARR website lower its
forecast for McNary discharge during May. It seems like the flows have been
lowered into the 130 range and there are fewer days near 170. Also the
second half of April doesn't seem to have panned out as I expected. The
outflows stayed at 100-110 at McNary. Can you email or call with some
additional insight?
Thank you,
Phillip | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
I am going to have more names to give you from Argentina. Actually, I need
to give access to a number of people to different areas of the swap
database. I am in a seminar the rest of today, but when I get back I'll
email you or give you a call about the access. | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Hertzberg press conference on proposed legislation from Democratic Caucus
Here is my personal favorite: "Ensure power by requiring new power plants to
enter into purchasing agreements with the state."
Sue Mara
Enron Corp.
Tel: (415) 782-7802
Fax:(415) 782-7854
----- Forwarded by Susan J Mara/NA/Enron on 02/08/2001 11:29 AM -----
"Allen, Stevan" <[email protected]>
02/08/2001 11:21 AM
To: "Beiser, Megan" <[email protected]>, "''[email protected]' '"
<[email protected]>, "'Aaron Thomas (E-mail) (E-mail) '"
<[email protected]>, "'Andrea Weller (E-mail) (E-mail) '"
<[email protected]>, "'andrew Chau (E-mail) (E-mail) '" <[email protected]>,
"'Bill Chen (E-mail) (E-mail) '" <[email protected]>, "'Douglas Oglesby
(E-mail) (E-mail) '" <[email protected]>, "Fairchild, Tracy"
<[email protected]>, "'Jeffrey Hanson (E-mail) (E-mail) '"
<[email protected]>, "'jennifer Chamberlin (E-mail) (E-mail) '"
<[email protected]>, "'john Barthrop (E-mail) (E-mail) '"
<[email protected]>, "'John Leslie (E-mail) (E-mail) '"
<[email protected]>, "'Joseph Alamo (E-mail) (E-mail) '" <[email protected]>,
"''Michael Nelson' (E-mail) '" <[email protected]>, "'Mona Petrochka
(E-mail) '" <[email protected]>, "'Peter Bray (E-mail) (E-mail) '"
<[email protected]>, "'Rebecca Schlanert (E-mail) (E-mail) '"
<[email protected]>, "'Richard Counihan (E-mail) (E-mail) '"
<[email protected]>, "''Robert Morgan' (E-mail) '"
<[email protected]>, "'Sue Mara (E-mail) (E-mail) '" <[email protected]>
cc: "Warner, Jami" <[email protected]>, "Manuel, Erica"
<[email protected]>, "Fairchild, Tracy" <[email protected]>,
"Anderson, Kristin" <[email protected]>
Subject: AReM: Hertzberg Update
AReM Team:
Here is report from Hertzberg news conference:
Democratic Caucus announced a package of bills to increase the supply of
electricity and cut down on demand through energy efficiency.
The package being introduced will produce more than 750 megawatts and save
1,200 megawatts over the next few years.
Said the energy efficiency package may save as many as 500 megawatts,
equivalent to a new power plant.
Demos presented a four bill package aimed at rapidly increasing and
stabilizing the supply of power available to the demands of residents and
businesses. The bills would:
Provide $50 million to establish an incentive program to encourage business
to install clean and modern on-site generation.
Provide $150 million to develop clean and efficient renewable energy supply
Allow plants up to 100 megawatts to be cityby local government andnot
through Energy Commission review
Ensure power by requiring new power plants to enter into purchasing
agreements with the state.
They also introduced five bills to provide funding to"
Replace energy inefficient appliances like refrigerators and air
conditioners;
Give schools grants and loans to decrease consumption
Provide 50 percent grants and 50 percent loans to local governments to
retrofit buildings;
Establish a Mobile Efficiency Brigade with $100 million in grants to
nonprofits to hire a team of people to distribute low-energy lightbulbs to
residences, saving 125 megawatts, but help other conservation programs get
started twell before the summer by providig people to do the work while
learning new skills.
-----Original Message-----
From: Beiser, Megan
To: '[email protected]'; Aaron Thomas (E-mail) (E-mail); Andrea Weller
(E-mail) (E-mail); andrew Chau (E-mail) (E-mail); Bill Chen (E-mail)
(E-mail); Douglas Oglesby (E-mail) (E-mail); Fairchild, Tracy; Jeffrey
Hanson (E-mail) (E-mail); jennifer Chamberlin (E-mail) (E-mail); john
Barthrop (E-mail) (E-mail); John Leslie (E-mail) (E-mail); Joseph Alamo
(E-mail) (E-mail); 'Michael Nelson' (E-mail); Mona Petrochka (E-mail); Peter
Bray (E-mail) (E-mail); Rebecca Schlanert (E-mail) (E-mail); Richard
Counihan (E-mail) (E-mail); 'Robert Morgan' (E-mail); Sue Mara (E-mail)
(E-mail)
Cc: Allen, Stevan; Warner, Jami; Manuel, Erica; Fairchild, Tracy; Anderson,
Kristin
Sent: 2/8/01 11:40 AM
Subject: Several Press Briefings in Sacramento today
AReM-ers,
It's a busy day today for press briefings as you can see from the
schedule below. We'll be covering these events this morning and will
get news releases, press materials from all as well.
We will provide updates as soon as possible and get them out to you.
*********************
9 a.m., SACRAMENTO _ State Treasurer Phil Angelides
holds
media briefing to discuss issuance of energy-related bonds, 915 Capitol
Mall, room 110. Contact: Colleen Beamish, 916-653-4052.
9:30 a.m., SACRAMENTO _ Assembly Speaker Robert Hertzberg and others
discuss legislation to promote energy conservation and increase power
supplies, Capitol, room 317. Contact: Paul Hefner, 916-319-2408.
11:30 a.m., YUBA CITY _ Gov. Gray Davis discusses his plans to increase
electricity generating capacity in California, Sutter power plant
project,
5087-A South Township Rd. Contact: 916-445-4571.
Noon, SACRAMENTO _ Republican lawmakers hold news conference to discuss
failure of parent companies to keep their utility subsidiaries
sufficiently
solvent to serve the public interest, Capitol, room 1190. Contact: Wade
Teasdale, 916-445-3731. | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
A new Kudlow's Take has been published on Kudlow.com. As a subscriber, you may click the hyperlink below, login, and view the latest Kudlow's Take. AOL Users please note, you may need to copy and paste the hyperlink into your web browser.
Thank You,
Kudlow & Company, LLC.
http://www.kudlow.com/members/login.asp?To=Content&ContentID=363 | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
David, do we need to "volunteer" people to participate? Do we want a more
structured process?
Regards
Delainey
---------------------- Forwarded by David W Delainey/HOU/ECT on 10/10/2000
06:04 PM ---------------------------
Enron North America Corp.
From: Shelly Jones, Recruiting Manager @ ENRON
10/10/2000 06:03 PM
Sent by: Enron Announcements@ENRON
To: All Enron Employees North America
cc:
Subject: Associate/Analyst Super Saturday Participation
Enron Managing Directors, Vice Presidents, Directors, and Managers Who
Utilize the Associate/Analyst Pool
As a follow up from a "SAVE THE DATE" email regarding your participation in
the Associate and Analyst Super Saturday process, now is the time to select
your dates to attend and participate.
Below are the dates for Super Saturday weekends during the upcoming
recruiting season. If you are Houston-based or if you know you will be in
Houston on business at the appropriate times please click the link below to
volunteer.
http://axis.enron.com/notice/ssinvite.asp
(When selecting dates please avoid selecting to interview candidates who
attend the schools for which you are a team member.)
Associates Analysts
October 27-28, 2000 November 3-4
Thunderbird, UT, Georgetown, Rice Rice, UT, Baylor, A&M, OU, Florida, LSU,
UHCL
November 10-11, 2000 November, 17-18, 2000
Columbia, Stern NYU, UCLA, Darden, Cornell Penn, UVA, Vanderbilt, Michigan,
Howard, AUC,
Vanderbilt, Michigan UHMain
December, 1-2, 2000 December 8-9, 20000
Chicago, Kellogg, Harvard, Wharton, MIT Wellesley, overflow and re-schedules
from previous s/s
Friday, December 15, 2000
Carnegie Mellon
Thank you for your support of the Associate and Analyst Programs.
Shelly Jones
Recruiting Manager | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Michael,
The science of measuring operational risk is in its early stages of
development.
There are really no cook-book solutions. One has to use creativity and a lot
of common sense.
Vince
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Operational Risk
Mr. Kaminsky,
Recently, I read articles published by GARP and monographs in a book
published by GARP. Although they are excellent sources of introduction to
operational risk, none of them have any details on the "how to."
If you know of a good book or book(s) could you recommend one?
Thank you.
Michael Kim | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
I think my ISP server is about to crash from 'Man Night' traffic. When are we going to the GCCA crawfish boil at Tonys?
----- Original Message -----
From: Parks, Joe <mailto:[email protected]>
To: Fenner, Chet <mailto:[email protected]> ; chad knipe <mailto:[email protected]> ; Brian Constantine <mailto:[email protected]> ; EriK Wollam <mailto:[email protected]> ; Brad Corrier <mailto:[email protected]> ; [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> ; [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 5:58 AM
Subject: RE: man night again?
what are you guys talking about?
-----Original Message-----
From: Fenner, Chet [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 6:43 AM
To: 'chad knipe'; Fenner, Chet; Brian Constantine; EriK Wollam; Brad Corrier; [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>; Parks, Joe; [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
Subject: RE: man night again?
Screw it, I'm going to Tony's.
-----Original Message-----
From: chad knipe [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 6:55 PM
To: Chet Fenner; Brian Constantine; EriK Wollam; Brad Corrier; [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>; [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>; [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
Subject: Re: man night again?
what
----- Original Message -----
From: Fenner, Chet
Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 3:01 PM
To: 'chad knipe'; Fenner, Chet; Brian Constantine; EriK Wollam; Brad Corrier; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]
Subject: RE: man night again?
I feel like Erik. No one will answer my question.
-----Original Message-----
From: chad knipe [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 2:49 PM
To: Chet Fenner; Brian Constantine; EriK Wollam; Brad Corrier; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]
Subject: Re: man night again?
sh"IN" - dig.......get it? aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaahhhhhhhhhhhhhaaaaaaaaaaaaahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaahhhhhhhhhhhh
----- Original Message -----
From: Fenner, Chet
Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 5:11 PM
To: 'chad knipe'; Brian Constantine; EriK Wollam; Brad Corrier; Fenner, Chet; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]
Subject: RE: man night again?
Where is this shin-dig?
-----Original Message-----
From: chad knipe [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Tuesday, April 30, 2002 6:23 AM
To: Brian Constantine; EriK Wollam; Brad Corrier; Chet Fenner; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]
Subject: Re: man night again?
in.
----- Original Message -----
From: Brian Constantine
Sent: Tuesday, April 30, 2002 8:26 AM
To: Erik Wollam; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]
Subject: RE: man night again?
I am IN!!! Would like to be there by 6:30 or so...maybe later. Zander is "out"...unless he brings Jake. Someone forward to Chambers...you know he's in.
BC
-----Original Message-----
From: Erik Wollam [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Thursday, April 25, 2002 5:25 PM
To: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; Brian Constantine; [email protected]
Subject: man night again?
Zero response from my last effort on this matter. Are your emails working
men?
Zander called and suggested we attend the CCA crawfish boil function to be
held Thurday May 2, 2002. Reasonably priced event, beer, mud bugs and we can
sit back and watch pig win raffle prizes.
I'm in
e.
_________________________________________________________________
Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device: http://mobile.msn.com
************************************************************************
This e-mail is the property of Bridgeline Holdings, L.P. and/or its relevant affiliate(s) and may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender and delete all copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a binding and enforceable contract between Bridgeline Holdings, L.P. (or any of its affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not be relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise. Thank you.
************************************************************************ | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Dear All,
After listening to the various viewpoints and concerns expressed in our
last conference call, I believe that the panel options listed in Option 3
of Rob's draft might be most effective in producing the type of discourse
that we are seeking.
I propose that we schedule a conference call for this Friday afternoon,
September 1, at 4PM EDT. I mentioned that I have reserved the Krutch
Theater (max.capacity 375) for the week of November 13-17. I have since
been informed that I can only hold the whole week through Wednesday,
September 6, therefore, it will be important to narrow the options down
very soon if we can.
Best wishes,
Heather
At 06:44 AM 8/30/00 -0400, [email protected] wrote:
>Shall we try to talk again Monday? I think I will talk to Borenstein to see
>what the Haas folks have in mind.
>
>I tried to capture everyone's comments. Allen, you might want to explain
more
>about your panel suggestions since I didn't do them justice. As you'll see I
>took the liberty of offering a new characterization of the panels that I
>didn't
>bring up on the call. Everything on there is offered as a strawman to be
>criticized and changed.
>Rob <<Draft program.doc>>
>
>Rob Gramlich
>PJM Market Monitoring Unit
>(610) 666-4291
>[email protected]
>
>
Heather Cameron, Events Coordinator
The Richard & Rhoda Goldman School of Public Policy
University of California, Berkeley
2607 Hearst Avenue
Berkeley, CA 94720
Tel: 510-642-9437
Fax: 510-643-9657
GSPP home page: http://gspp.berkeley.edu | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Quick download on today's California conference call:
With regard to pending legislative activity, our efforts should
1) not advocate for anything in the San Diego market that we would not want
to get in the SCE and PG&E markets;
2) push for a lock-in of the rate freeze in the SCE and PG&E markets through
at least 3/02, which will probably mean 12/02 to cover the summer of '02, but
resist extension through '03. (No CTC extension, however.)
Specific legislative language will start showing up this weekend or Monday.
---------------------- Forwarded by Marcia A Linton/NA/Enron on 08/25/2000
04:03 PM ---------------------------
Joseph Alamo @ EES
08/24/2000 06:00 PM
To: California Government Affairs, Edward Hamb/HOU/EES@EES, Jennifer
Rudolph/HOU/EES@EES, Chris Hendrix/HOU/EES@EES, Greg Cordell/HOU/EES@EES,
Harold G Buchanan/HOU/EES@EES, Martin Wenzel/SFO/HOU/EES@EES, Douglas
Condon/SFO/EES@EES, James M Wood/HOU/EES@EES, Gary Mirich/HOU/EES@EES, Dennis
Benevides/HOU/EES@EES, Roger Yang/SFO/EES@EES, David Parquet@ECT,
[email protected], Paul Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT, Marcie Milner/Corp/Enron@ENRON,
Mary Hain@Enron, Harry Kingerski/HOU/EES@EES, James D Steffes/HOU/EES@EES,
Richard Shapiro/HOU/EES@EES, Peggy Mahoney/HOU/EES@EES, Karen Denne@Enron,
Mark Palmer/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron, Tim
Belden/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Lysa Akin/PDX/ECT@ECT, Ginger Dernehl/NA/Enron@Enron, Maureen
McVicker/NA/Enron@Enron, Marcia A Linton/NA/Enron@Enron
Subject: Conference Call Advisory/Invitation re: CA Legislative and
Regulatory Update
On behalf of Enron Host Bruno Gaillard, please consider this an invitation to
participate
in a conference call regarding California legislative and regulatory
updates. You may join the call on:
Date: Friday, August 25, 2000
Time: 1:00 PM PDT/3:00 PM CDT/4:00 PM EDT
Call-in Number: 1-877-233-7845
Pass Code: 126069
Host Code (Bruno only): 494209
Thanks in advance for your participation.
Joseph Alamo
Sr. Administrative Assistant
Government Affairs - The Americas
San Francisco CA | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Sent to the wrong address for evening social the first time...
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected]
> [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Monday, October 23, 2000 12:50 PM
> To: [email protected]; [email protected];
> [email protected]
> Subject: HaasWeek Survivor Contest - Vote Now!
>
> In case you did not read today's issue of HaasWeek yet (what's wrong with
> you?!), today is the official launch of the HaasWeek Survivor contest. I
> won't bore you with all the details here, you can get them on pages 6-7 of
> this week's issue.
>
> But what I will excite you with is the opportunity to make a real
> difference in the world! That's right - this contest is totally driven by
> the votes of the Haas Community. Each week, you, the people of Haas, will
> have the opportunity to vote off one of our contestants, and the last man
> or woman standing on the HaasWeek "island" will win a digital camera. So
> don't let that camera fall into the wrong hands! Take a look at that
> candidate photos and statements in the pages of HaasWeek, make a snap
> judgment, and go to the following link to vote someone off (you may only
> vote once): http://www.opinionpower.com/Surveys/32202046.html
>
> But you must vote between Monday, 9am and Wednesday, 5pm, when the polls
> close so we can tabulate the results!!! The polls are open now!!!
>
> Let's face it, in the national presidential election, your vote isn't
> going to make much of a difference (if you're eligible to vote in the
> first place) - Gore has California locked up. In local political
> elections, you probably don't know a thing about the candidates. But in
> the HaasWeek Survivor Contest, your vote could be critical in determining
> who gets to stay alive in the most exciting contest on the Haas campus
> since the last contest that was held on the Haas campus! (Last I checked,
> only one person had voted so far!) So get online and vote before
> Wednesday at 5:00pm!!!
>
> A link to the voting survey will also be available at www.haasweek.net
> each week. In order to avoid excessive spam abuse, I will post all future
> voting reminders and updates about exciting HaasWeek Survivor Contest
> "Immunity Challenges" to mba_social and evmba_social only. Keep an eye
> out, and remember to vote every week!
>
> Thanks,
> Joe Moss
- winmail.dat | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Car Rental Options for Enron Travelers
Rental car contracts for 2001 have been awarded to:
National Car Rental (Primary) and Alamo Rent-A-Car (Secondary).
The intent of these agreements is to consolidate and leverage Enron's total
car rental spend to achieve the most favorable rates and non-pricing
provisions (i.e. insurance).
National Car Rental, due to its service levels, availability and total value
proposition, has been awarded Primary status and is recommended as the first
choice for Enron travelers' needs.
Alamo Rent-A-Car, a sister company to National, has been awarded a contract
reflecting a Secondary status, due to its service levels, availability and
low cost solutions. Alamo is recommended as an alternative to National,
where available.
When you rent a vehicle in the United States, (including Puerto Rico) or
Canada, the following insurance provisions are included, regardless of rate
selected:
1. L/DW (Loss/Damage Waiver) - This is what is called Comprehensive or
Collision on your personal auto. It covers the rental vehicle and pays for
any damage to it.
2. Liability - This covers people and property outside the rental vehicle.
For both National and Alamo, the coverage is $100,000 per person, $300,000
per occurrence and $50,000 for property damage.
** IMPORTANT ***
These coverages apply regardless of rate selected, as long as the following
contract ID is communicated at the time of reservation and rental is recorded
on the transaction rental agreement. (National - 5000838 Alamo - #143974)
To enjoy the highest levels of service while renting a vehicle from Enron's
preferred suppliers, it is recommended that each traveler enroll in
National's and Alamo's preferred traveler programs. National's Emerald Club
membership and Alamo's Quicksilver program are designed to speed the
transaction time by providing services such as counter bypass and rapid
return. The enrollment fees for these programs have been waived for Enron
travelers. Enrollment packets will be mailed to the addresses of Enron
American Express T&E Cardholders. You may also find an enrollment form on
the Enron Travel Program intranet @ gss.enron.com <http://gss.enron.com/>.
If you have any questions or comments, please contact Jeff Leath at
713-646-6165. | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Start Date: 4/15/01; HourAhead hour: 8; HourAhead schedule download failed.
Manual intervention required. | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
The gloves are off and the courtship begins - what's your work address?
Valentine goodies are on the way. I'm officially in love... with you!
To: Chris Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Matthew B Fleming/HOU/EES@EES
Subject: Re: Flight Info
Well Chris, you know what the problem is? You never bought me that $25,000
diamond ring you kept promising me. You're all talk.
To: Matthew B Fleming/HOU/EES@EES
cc: Heidi Griffith/DUB/EES@EES
Subject: Re: Flight Info
She doesn't know that I exist, now that I'm single again and all. I should
be able to lose 30 or 40 pounds by then.
Matthew B Fleming@EES
01/31/2001 02:13 PM
To: Chris Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Heidi Griffith/DUB/EES@EES
Subject: Flight Info
Could you please pick her up and entertain her that weekend, I will be too
busy. Sorry for the inconvenience, I owe you one.
---------------------- Forwarded by Matthew B Fleming/HOU/EES on 01/31/2001
02:11 PM ---------------------------
Enron Energy Services
From: Heidi Griffith 01/31/2001 02:08 PM
Phone No: (614)718-6340
To: Matthew B Fleming/HOU/EES@EES
cc:
Subject: Flight Info
Well the tickets have been purchased. We arrive at the Hobby, TX airport at
10:45 am on Friday, Mar. 16 flight # 1451. We will be departing on Monday,
March 19 at 10:55 am. You have to promise me that we can eat at Lupe's
Friday night!! | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
----- Forwarded by Tana Jones/HOU/ECT on 10/19/2000 07:51 AM -----
Frank L Davis
10/06/2000 10:58 AM
To: Tom Moran/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bradley Diebner/HOU/ECT@ECT, Karen
Lambert/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Lisa Lees/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Argentine Customers List
Attached below is the Argentine customer list for EnronOnline. My
understanding is that we will launch EnronOnline in Argentina within the next
couple of weeks. With this in mind, I think we will have to shoot for the
end of next week (October 13) to have customer profiles completed. Please
let Lisa Lees know of any conflicts or issues that arise.
Thanks!
Frank
---------------------- Forwarded by Frank L Davis/HOU/ECT on 10/06/2000 10:36
AM ---------------------------
Leonardo Pacheco@ENRON
10/03/2000 05:19 PM
To: Frank L Davis/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Carlos Alatorre/NA/Enron@Enron
Subject: Argentine Customers List
Frank,
It seems now that we are going to proceed with Argentina. Therefore, I am
attaching the customer list. I am not sure if you already have it.
Thanks!
Leonardo Pacheco
---------------------- Forwarded by Leonardo Pacheco/Corp/Enron on 10/03/2000
04:16 PM ---------------------------
Patrick Hansen
10/03/2000 04:40 PM
To: Leonardo Pacheco/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: Customers
Esta es la lista que querias. | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Toni,
Please let me know if I left anything out. Thanks for your help.
DG 3-9573 | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
We will trade this product every day, but we aim to start trading it this bid
week, if possible.
Eric
Dale Neuner 05/04/2000 01:41 PM
To: Eric Bass/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michael Belmont/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark
Dilworth/LON/ECT@ECT, Jennifer deBoisblanc Denny/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: 24x5 Nat Gas Product calculations
Michael - can you give me an idea of where we are in uploading the Specs for
this.
Eric, our biggest concern with this right now is the valuation for the
Products that you would see in your Position Summary. We know that is we
passed these trades through the system as a straight month-long transaction,
that the valuation would be wrong. Additionally, the start and end dates will
skue the valuation based on which day of the week the first calendar day of
the month falls on and which day of the week the last calendar day of the
month falls on. Using a straight 5/7 valuation methodology is only going to
get you 'close' to true value in the Position Summary. Hence, the specs sent
to Mike that you see in the e-mail below will need to be built.
In short, Eol was not set up to readily accept this valuation methodology. We
will get you as close as we can, and we will give you some idea of how close
these Position Values will be.
Also, can you confirm that you intent to always and ONLY trade this Product
during bid week?
Dale
---------------------- Forwarded by Dale Neuner/HOU/ECT on 05/04/2000 01:37
PM ---------------------------
Mark Dilworth
04/28/2000 04:23 AM
To: Michael Belmont/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Teresa Smith/Corp/Enron@Enron, Jay Webb/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jennifer deBoisblanc
Denny/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dale Neuner/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sheri Thomas/HOU/ECT@ECT, David
Forster/Corp/Enron@Enron
Subject: 24x5 Nat Gas Product calculations
Michael,
I owe you a spec. re. this and here it is:
The volume for products that have delivery frequency of:
Daily
Hourly
Half Hourly
need to be modified by the multiplier week coverage factor.
This is found on table EOL_WEEKDAY_GROUPINGS, and the link is
EOL_MARKET_PRODUCTS.DELIVERY_WEEKDAY_GROUP_ID =
EOL_WEEKDAY_GROUPINGS.WEEKDAY_GROUP_ID.
M
---------------------- Forwarded by Mark Dilworth/LON/ECT on 04/27/2000 12:30
PM ---------------------------
From: Jennifer deBoisblanc Denny on 04/27/2000 01:38 AM
To: Mark Dilworth/LON/ECT@ECT, Michael Belmont/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Dale Neuner/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sheri Thomas/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: 24x5 Nat Gas Product calculations
Mark & Michael,
Remember we had discussed this when you were here.
The question is ......................in EOL Reports there is a Position
Summary Report and in Stack Manager there is the Transaction Summary.
will these calculate properly on the 24x5 product? The start date & end date
will imply every day but the product excludes weekends.
---------------------- Forwarded by Jennifer deBoisblanc Denny/HOU/ECT on
04/26/2000 06:21 PM ---------------------------
Dale Neuner 04/26/2000 03:44 PM
To: Mark Dilworth/LON/ECT@ECT
cc: Jennifer deBoisblanc Denny/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: 24x5 Nat Gas Product calculations
We have finsihed creating and testing a the new 24x5 Nat Gas Product (a month
long transaction which only moves gas Mon-Fri). A final question has come up
- how will these be calculated. Jennifer is under the impression that
something was being built in the EOL Position Summary Report that would be
able to calculate these kinds of trades. Is that the case? Has that been done?
Dale | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
We need to have a meeting regarding version 3.
Let me know when you have time?
I dont want a 10 person meeting. Just you and myself.
geof | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Commencing with an NHK (Japanese public TV) report and quickly spreading to
media inquiries and wire reports, earlier today a story spread through Japan
that the Enron affiliate E Power has immediate plans to build at least one
large (1000 MW) power plant. In fact, appears that E Power has been
pursuing this prospect, but nothing has progressed to high level management
or board approval
We are in the process of providing interviews and responding to inquiries
from major Japanese media and others. These inquiries have been in
anticipation of the March 21 partial liberalization of the Japanese power
sector. These discussions also are being utilized to confirm that Enron will
be opening a merchant office in Japan. This is in addition to the EnCom/E
Power affiliate, which is focused on industrial power generation. Attached
are the Q&As we are using in response to media inquiries. | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Good job, Jane and team. mcs
---------------------- Forwarded by Mark Schroeder/LON/ECT on 06/02/2001
09:14 ---------------------------
Neil McGregor@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
06/02/2001 08:50
To: Jane Wilson/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc: Wade Cline/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Mohan
Gurunath/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Paul
Kraske/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Rajesh
Sivaraman/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Jimmy
Mogal/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Mukesh
Tyagi/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Sanjeev
Khandekar/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Mark Schroeder@ECT, Steven J
Kean/NA/Enron@Enron, Ban Sharma/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Akshay
Singh/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Amr
Ibrahim/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Heidi
Hellmann/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Ashok
Mehta/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, K
Seethayya/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
Subject: Re: MSEB tariffs. The final Cost-of-Service model for 1999-2000
This is brilliant Jane and team. I would like to build a database in DPC to
keep this rate filing type info in. Can you in the meantime put in other
columns of info such as number of consumers and the amount of billing for
each group. This would give us another angle. Jane lets discuss with IT the
set up of a database to house this and other info. Can you arrange with
Sevina and Raghulan.
Neil
Jane Wilson
02/06/2001 01:32 PM
To: Wade Cline/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Neil
McGregor/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Mohan
Gurunath/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Paul
Kraske/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Rajesh
Sivaraman/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Jimmy
Mogal/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Mukesh
Tyagi/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Sanjeev
Khandekar/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Mark Schroeder@ECT, Steven J
Kean/NA/Enron@Enron
cc: Ban Sharma/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Akshay
Singh/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Amr
Ibrahim/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Heidi
Hellmann/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Ashok
Mehta/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, K
Seethayya/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
Subject: MSEB tariffs. The final Cost-of-Service model for 1999-2000
An additional complementary tariff study was developed by Amr Ibrahim and
B.A.N. Sharma with assistance from Akshay Singh regarding the MSEB tariffs --
a traditional cost of service study. This study is for 1999-2000 and
allocates MSEB's revenue requirements to the various customer classes based
on their cost of service. In this case, you can see the difference between
the allocated average cost and the actual average realisations from the
tariffs as they are today, which gives you an idea of the basic tariff
rationalisation that must occur to remove the unreasonable cross subsidies.
(Note: because of the paucity of data from MSEB, the team used the same load
factor assumptions used in the Andhra Pradesh cost of service study.) | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Thome, Sole - hey, that rhymes...
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 03/07/2001 04:20
PM ---------------------------
Dale Rasmussen@ECT
03/06/2001 12:05 PM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: FW: ENRON - Meeting - Training Scope
---------------------- Forwarded by Dale Rasmussen/HOU/ECT on 03/06/2001
10:02 AM ---------------------------
Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp.
From: "Thompson, Peter J." <[email protected]>
02/28/2001 09:15 AM
To: "Dale Rasmussen (E-mail)" <[email protected]>
cc: "Kay Mann (E-mail)" <[email protected]>, "Pipitone, Paul"
<[email protected]>, "Cobb, Chris" <[email protected]>
Subject: FW: ENRON - Meeting - Training Scope
Attached is Exhibit H-2.
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Thursday, December 21, 2000 7:07 PM
To: Thompson, Peter J.
Subject: FW: ENRON - Meeting - Training Scope
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 12/21/2000
06:06
PM ---------------------------
[email protected] on 12/21/2000 04:25:08 PM
To: [email protected]
cc: [email protected]
Subject: FW: ENRON - Meeting - Training Scope
I'm forwarding this per my conversion with John Ayres as the Training
insert
H-2
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Johnson, Lee L (PS, SSEP)
> Sent: Friday, March 17, 2000 3:50 PM
> To: '[email protected]'; '[email protected]'
> Cc: Davis, David F (PS, SSEP); Kuo, Kathy (PS, SSEP);
> '[email protected]'
> Subject: FW: ENRON - Meeting - Training Scope
>
>
> Kathy/Mike-
>
> Attached is our latest Training Course agenda. Since our Engine and
> Packaging businesses are now organized as one, we've combined the
Engine
> Familiarization and Generator Set Operator Training Courses into a
single
> Training Course. We would envision providing this training at each
> Facility Site.
>
> This outline should be used to replace the language in Exhibit H-2 to
> accurately describe the current course agenda. We'll discuss the
content
> in detail on Tuesday with Mike, to be sure that nothing is dropped
from
> the Training content.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Lee
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Kuo, Kathy (PS, SSEP)
> Sent: Thursday, March 16, 2000 11:12 AM
> To: Roy Allice (E-mail)
> Cc: Johnson, Lee L (PS, SSEP)
> Subject: ENRON - Meeting - Training Scope
>
> Roy,
>
> 1. MEETING INFORMATION:
> Who: Enron, Lee Johnson, Kathy Kuo, Roy Allice
> Where: Downtown Houston. 3 Allen Center, 333 Clay St., Suite
400
> (sign in).
> When: 1:30 PM - ? (Lee Johnson to confirm)
>
>
> 2. Attached is the file David Davis sent to Lee for Enron Training
Scope.
> Note that it is the 5-day Basic Op.
>
> <<Training LM6000.pdf>>
>
> 3. Please confirm (per our discussion this morning) that you will be
able
> to attend this meeting. If not, please let me know if there is
someone
> that can attend in your place.
>
>
> Thanks!
> Kathy
(See attached file: Training LM6000.pdf)
- Training LM6000.pdf | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Start Date: 1/6/02; HourAhead hour: 14; No ancillary schedules awarded. Variances detected.
Variances detected in Load schedule.
LOG MESSAGES:
PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final Schedules\2002010614.txt
---- Load Schedule ----
$$$ Variance found in table tblLoads.
Details: (Hour: 14 / Preferred: 401.05 / Final: 401.02)
TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
LOAD_ID: SCE1
MKT_TYPE: 2
TRANS_DATE: 1/6/02
SC_ID: ENRJ | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Good morning,
Hope you had a great holiday!
Bill | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
David Lin
Management Center
Formosa Plastics Corporation, USA
9 Peach Tree Hill Road
Livingston, NJ 07039 | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Steve passed them over to me -- thanks! MSA
-----Original Message-----
From: Williamson, Joannie
Sent: Monday, July 30, 2001 2:35 PM
To: Allen, Margaret
Subject: Energy Forum
I have faxed the following decline letters to Steve Kean and will forward originals to you.
John A. DeFrancisco The Senate of New York
E. Leon Jacobs, Jr. State of Florida - Public Service Commission
Alan Noia Allegheny Energy, Inc.
Thanks,
Joannie | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 03/06/2001
05:23 PM ---------------------------
[email protected] on 03/06/2001 05:22:34 PM
To: [email protected], [email protected]
cc:
Subject: bilety
Wicku,
najtansze bilety $450 on internet do/z ?SJ:
IAH 2:35pm ??SJC 4:49pm Cont.#593 ??Sat. March 24
SJC 3:05pm ??IAH 8:56 pm Cont. # 1574 ?Wed. March 28
Wiec chyba to musisz zamowic, albo wykorzystac punkty i przyleciec do SFO,
wiecej lotow | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Sorry, Jan this file will not open. Please fax me the agreement. My fax
number is 713-646-3490.
Thanks!
Debra Perlingiere
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3885
Houston, Texas 77002
[email protected]
Phone 713-853-7658
Fax 713-646-3490 | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Dana,
Yes, 4 tickets should be included in the card.
Can you and Rufino take care of sorting and handing out the mail daily? I
would greatly appreciate it!
Have a great weekend!
N | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Ken, See attached. If Universal can provide the document online, I can
insert the appropriate language for all these comments. Please review and
let me know if you have any questions. | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
As a matter of convenience, John simply sent to Matt his working version of
the contract. This particular draft included some of his suggested changes
to those sections dealing with default as well as some of the cleanup that we
discussed re performance guarantees, LD's, ect. but should not impact the tax
analysis. By the way, John has run his comments re the default sections by
me and has also sent them to you for comment before we launch to GE. Do you
have any additional comments re his rewrite on the default provisions?
Agree that there should only be one draft (controlled by Peter) and in fact,
John is in the process of sending Peter an Email today, if time permits, re
his suggested changes so that they can be incorporated into the PT contract
draft.
Also, was there any consensus on the time for the weekly call tomorrow?
Kay Mann@ENRON
05/15/2001 09:17 AM
To: John G Rigby/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc: Sheila Tweed/HOU/ECT@ECT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Scott
Dieball/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Roseann
Engeldorf/Enron@EnronXGate
Subject: Re: GE- World Hunger
John,
I noticed a different file name on this draft than the version Pete Thompson
sent out. How is this version different from Pete's? I sure hate to have
more than one version of this monster being vetted at the same time.
Thanks,
kay | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Hi All,
Below are the EIM group links that were created in GCP. Please make sure these group links are added when creating new cp's or address roles.
EIM - Financial
EIM - Physical
EIM Brokers
EIM Products Exchange
Bernice C. Rodriguez
ENW GCP - Houston Operations
713-853-7972 | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
and none of them are good :-)
To: Eric Bass/HOU/ECT@ECT, Chad Landry/HOU/ECT@ECT, Matthew
Lenhart/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bryan Hull/HOU/ECT@ECT, Phillip M Love/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Brian Hoskins/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Luis
Mena/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: FYI
With all of the HYPE surrounding the Big 12 this season....
Nine SEC teams are going to bowls, an unprecedented number of bowl-bound
teams from a single conference in NCAA history. | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Tana:
TXU Loan Star Pipeline is NOT authorized to trade US power -- restricted by
credit.
**************
Virginia Electric Power Company -- no changes to profile
Leslie | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Kori,
Please make all adjustments that are needed for the Prepay books, in the
January DPR. These variances are causing a problem for Faith Killen's flash
to actual process and Arthur Anderson has been questioning the variance from
the total value in Schedule B versus the controls group schedule. AA loves to
dissect the prepay books!
Please let me know if any of you have any questions.
Thanks! | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Attached are the St. Mary's letter agreement incorporating some revisions
relating to the VPP transaction and a marked copy showing changes from the
last draft distributed. Please let me know if you have any questions or
comments or advise Joan if these revisions are OK. Thanks.
Teresa G. Bushman
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3835A
Houston, TX 77002
(713) 853-7895
fax (713) 646-3393
[email protected] | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Please find supporting documents.
Thank you.
Jane Chen
Assistant to Gary S. Fergus
(415) 979-2944
Notice of Motion 4 TRO.PDF
MPA 4 TRO.PDF
<<Notice of Motion 4 TRO.PDF>> <<MPA 4 TRO.PDF>>
=======================================================
This email message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may
contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review,
use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended
recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of
the original message.
To reply to our email administrator directly, send an email to
[email protected]
BROBECK PHLEGER & HARRISON LLP
http://www.brobeck.com
- Notice of Motion 4 TRO.PDF
- MPA 4 TRO.PDF | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.