<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street, and officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene, therefore the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
stringlengths 355
1.02k
|
|---|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the cat is sleeping on the couch then the arson occurred on elm street, and the cat is sleeping on the couch, which establishes that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the cat is sleeping on the couch then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The cat is sleeping on the couch
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, since if the cat is sleeping on the couch then the arson occurred on elm street and the cat is sleeping on the couch.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the cat is sleeping on the couch then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The cat is sleeping on the couch
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, because if the cat is sleeping on the couch then the arson occurred on elm street and the cat is sleeping on the couch.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the cat is sleeping on the couch then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The cat is sleeping on the couch
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, as if the cat is sleeping on the couch then the arson occurred on elm street and the cat is sleeping on the couch.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the cat is sleeping on the couch then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The cat is sleeping on the couch
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the cat is sleeping on the couch then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, therefore the cat is not sleeping on the couch.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the cat is sleeping on the couch then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The cat is not sleeping on the couch
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the cat is sleeping on the couch then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, hence the cat is not sleeping on the couch.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the cat is sleeping on the couch then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The cat is not sleeping on the couch
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the cat is sleeping on the couch then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, thus the cat is not sleeping on the couch.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the cat is sleeping on the couch then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The cat is not sleeping on the couch
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the cat is sleeping on the couch then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so it can be concluded that the cat is not sleeping on the couch.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the cat is sleeping on the couch then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The cat is not sleeping on the couch
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the cat is sleeping on the couch then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so the cat is not sleeping on the couch.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the cat is sleeping on the couch then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The cat is not sleeping on the couch
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the cat is sleeping on the couch then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which implies that the cat is not sleeping on the couch.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the cat is sleeping on the couch then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The cat is not sleeping on the couch
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the cat is sleeping on the couch then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which shows that the cat is not sleeping on the couch.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the cat is sleeping on the couch then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The cat is not sleeping on the couch
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the cat is sleeping on the couch then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which establishes that the cat is not sleeping on the couch.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the cat is sleeping on the couch then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The cat is not sleeping on the couch
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is not sleeping on the couch, since if the cat is sleeping on the couch then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the cat is sleeping on the couch then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The cat is not sleeping on the couch
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is not sleeping on the couch, because if the cat is sleeping on the couch then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the cat is sleeping on the couch then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The cat is not sleeping on the couch
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is not sleeping on the couch, as if the cat is sleeping on the couch then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the cat is sleeping on the couch then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The cat is not sleeping on the couch
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the dog is barking at the television then the arson occurred on elm street, and the dog is barking at the television, therefore the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the dog is barking at the television then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The dog is barking at the television
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the dog is barking at the television then the arson occurred on elm street, and the dog is barking at the television, hence the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the dog is barking at the television then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The dog is barking at the television
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the dog is barking at the television then the arson occurred on elm street, and the dog is barking at the television, thus the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the dog is barking at the television then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The dog is barking at the television
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the dog is barking at the television then the arson occurred on elm street, and the dog is barking at the television, so it can be concluded that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the dog is barking at the television then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The dog is barking at the television
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the dog is barking at the television then the arson occurred on elm street, and the dog is barking at the television, so the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the dog is barking at the television then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The dog is barking at the television
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the dog is barking at the television then the arson occurred on elm street, and the dog is barking at the television, which implies that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the dog is barking at the television then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The dog is barking at the television
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the dog is barking at the television then the arson occurred on elm street, and the dog is barking at the television, which shows that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the dog is barking at the television then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The dog is barking at the television
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the dog is barking at the television then the arson occurred on elm street, and the dog is barking at the television, which establishes that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the dog is barking at the television then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The dog is barking at the television
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, since if the dog is barking at the television then the arson occurred on elm street and the dog is barking at the television.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the dog is barking at the television then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The dog is barking at the television
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, because if the dog is barking at the television then the arson occurred on elm street and the dog is barking at the television.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the dog is barking at the television then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The dog is barking at the television
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, as if the dog is barking at the television then the arson occurred on elm street and the dog is barking at the television.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the dog is barking at the television then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The dog is barking at the television
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the dog is barking at the television then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, therefore the dog is not barking at the television.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the dog is barking at the television then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The dog is not barking at the television
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the dog is barking at the television then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, hence the dog is not barking at the television.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the dog is barking at the television then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The dog is not barking at the television
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the dog is barking at the television then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, thus the dog is not barking at the television.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the dog is barking at the television then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The dog is not barking at the television
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the dog is barking at the television then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so it can be concluded that the dog is not barking at the television.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the dog is barking at the television then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The dog is not barking at the television
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the dog is barking at the television then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so the dog is not barking at the television.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the dog is barking at the television then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The dog is not barking at the television
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the dog is barking at the television then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which implies that the dog is not barking at the television.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the dog is barking at the television then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The dog is not barking at the television
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the dog is barking at the television then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which shows that the dog is not barking at the television.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the dog is barking at the television then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The dog is not barking at the television
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the dog is barking at the television then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which establishes that the dog is not barking at the television.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the dog is barking at the television then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The dog is not barking at the television
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The dog is not barking at the television, since if the dog is barking at the television then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the dog is barking at the television then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The dog is not barking at the television
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The dog is not barking at the television, because if the dog is barking at the television then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the dog is barking at the television then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The dog is not barking at the television
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The dog is not barking at the television, as if the dog is barking at the television then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the dog is barking at the television then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The dog is not barking at the television
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the book is a biography then the arson occurred on elm street, and the book is a biography, therefore the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the book is a biography then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The book is a biography
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the book is a biography then the arson occurred on elm street, and the book is a biography, hence the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the book is a biography then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The book is a biography
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the book is a biography then the arson occurred on elm street, and the book is a biography, thus the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the book is a biography then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The book is a biography
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the book is a biography then the arson occurred on elm street, and the book is a biography, so it can be concluded that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the book is a biography then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The book is a biography
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the book is a biography then the arson occurred on elm street, and the book is a biography, so the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the book is a biography then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The book is a biography
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the book is a biography then the arson occurred on elm street, and the book is a biography, which implies that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the book is a biography then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The book is a biography
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the book is a biography then the arson occurred on elm street, and the book is a biography, which shows that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the book is a biography then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The book is a biography
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the book is a biography then the arson occurred on elm street, and the book is a biography, which establishes that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the book is a biography then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The book is a biography
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, since if the book is a biography then the arson occurred on elm street and the book is a biography.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the book is a biography then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The book is a biography
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, because if the book is a biography then the arson occurred on elm street and the book is a biography.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the book is a biography then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The book is a biography
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, as if the book is a biography then the arson occurred on elm street and the book is a biography.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the book is a biography then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The book is a biography
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the book is a biography then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, therefore the book is not a biography.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the book is a biography then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The book is not a biography
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the book is a biography then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, hence the book is not a biography.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the book is a biography then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The book is not a biography
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the book is a biography then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, thus the book is not a biography.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the book is a biography then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The book is not a biography
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the book is a biography then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so it can be concluded that the book is not a biography.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the book is a biography then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The book is not a biography
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the book is a biography then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so the book is not a biography.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the book is a biography then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The book is not a biography
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the book is a biography then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which implies that the book is not a biography.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the book is a biography then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The book is not a biography
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the book is a biography then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which shows that the book is not a biography.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the book is a biography then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The book is not a biography
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the book is a biography then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which establishes that the book is not a biography.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the book is a biography then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The book is not a biography
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The book is not a biography, since if the book is a biography then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the book is a biography then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The book is not a biography
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The book is not a biography, because if the book is a biography then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the book is a biography then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The book is not a biography
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The book is not a biography, as if the book is a biography then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the book is a biography then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The book is not a biography
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the movie is a family film then the arson occurred on elm street, and the movie is a family film, therefore the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the movie is a family film then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The movie is a family film
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the movie is a family film then the arson occurred on elm street, and the movie is a family film, hence the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the movie is a family film then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The movie is a family film
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the movie is a family film then the arson occurred on elm street, and the movie is a family film, thus the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the movie is a family film then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The movie is a family film
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the movie is a family film then the arson occurred on elm street, and the movie is a family film, so it can be concluded that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the movie is a family film then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The movie is a family film
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the movie is a family film then the arson occurred on elm street, and the movie is a family film, so the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the movie is a family film then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The movie is a family film
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the movie is a family film then the arson occurred on elm street, and the movie is a family film, which implies that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the movie is a family film then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The movie is a family film
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the movie is a family film then the arson occurred on elm street, and the movie is a family film, which shows that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the movie is a family film then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The movie is a family film
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the movie is a family film then the arson occurred on elm street, and the movie is a family film, which establishes that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the movie is a family film then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The movie is a family film
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, since if the movie is a family film then the arson occurred on elm street and the movie is a family film.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the movie is a family film then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The movie is a family film
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, because if the movie is a family film then the arson occurred on elm street and the movie is a family film.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the movie is a family film then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The movie is a family film
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, as if the movie is a family film then the arson occurred on elm street and the movie is a family film.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the movie is a family film then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The movie is a family film
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the movie is a family film then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, therefore the movie is not a family film.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the movie is a family film then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The movie is not a family film
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the movie is a family film then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, hence the movie is not a family film.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the movie is a family film then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The movie is not a family film
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the movie is a family film then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, thus the movie is not a family film.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the movie is a family film then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The movie is not a family film
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the movie is a family film then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so it can be concluded that the movie is not a family film.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the movie is a family film then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The movie is not a family film
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the movie is a family film then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so the movie is not a family film.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the movie is a family film then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The movie is not a family film
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the movie is a family film then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which implies that the movie is not a family film.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the movie is a family film then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The movie is not a family film
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the movie is a family film then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which shows that the movie is not a family film.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the movie is a family film then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The movie is not a family film
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the movie is a family film then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which establishes that the movie is not a family film.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the movie is a family film then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The movie is not a family film
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The movie is not a family film, since if the movie is a family film then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the movie is a family film then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The movie is not a family film
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The movie is not a family film, because if the movie is a family film then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the movie is a family film then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The movie is not a family film
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The movie is not a family film, as if the movie is a family film then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the movie is a family film then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The movie is not a family film
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the sun is shining through the window then the arson occurred on elm street, and the sun is shining through the window, therefore the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the sun is shining through the window then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The sun is shining through the window
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the sun is shining through the window then the arson occurred on elm street, and the sun is shining through the window, hence the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the sun is shining through the window then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The sun is shining through the window
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the sun is shining through the window then the arson occurred on elm street, and the sun is shining through the window, thus the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the sun is shining through the window then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The sun is shining through the window
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the sun is shining through the window then the arson occurred on elm street, and the sun is shining through the window, so it can be concluded that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the sun is shining through the window then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The sun is shining through the window
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the sun is shining through the window then the arson occurred on elm street, and the sun is shining through the window, so the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the sun is shining through the window then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The sun is shining through the window
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the sun is shining through the window then the arson occurred on elm street, and the sun is shining through the window, which implies that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the sun is shining through the window then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The sun is shining through the window
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the sun is shining through the window then the arson occurred on elm street, and the sun is shining through the window, which shows that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the sun is shining through the window then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The sun is shining through the window
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the sun is shining through the window then the arson occurred on elm street, and the sun is shining through the window, which establishes that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the sun is shining through the window then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The sun is shining through the window
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, since if the sun is shining through the window then the arson occurred on elm street and the sun is shining through the window.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the sun is shining through the window then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The sun is shining through the window
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, because if the sun is shining through the window then the arson occurred on elm street and the sun is shining through the window.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the sun is shining through the window then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The sun is shining through the window
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, as if the sun is shining through the window then the arson occurred on elm street and the sun is shining through the window.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the sun is shining through the window then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The sun is shining through the window
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the sun is shining through the window then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, therefore the sun is not shining through the window.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the sun is shining through the window then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The sun is not shining through the window
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the sun is shining through the window then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, hence the sun is not shining through the window.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the sun is shining through the window then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The sun is not shining through the window
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the sun is shining through the window then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, thus the sun is not shining through the window.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the sun is shining through the window then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The sun is not shining through the window
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the sun is shining through the window then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so it can be concluded that the sun is not shining through the window.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the sun is shining through the window then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The sun is not shining through the window
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the sun is shining through the window then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so the sun is not shining through the window.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the sun is shining through the window then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The sun is not shining through the window
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the sun is shining through the window then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which implies that the sun is not shining through the window.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the sun is shining through the window then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The sun is not shining through the window
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the sun is shining through the window then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which shows that the sun is not shining through the window.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the sun is shining through the window then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The sun is not shining through the window
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the sun is shining through the window then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which establishes that the sun is not shining through the window.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the sun is shining through the window then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The sun is not shining through the window
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.