<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street, and officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene, therefore the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
stringlengths 355
1.02k
|
|---|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, because if the movie is a sports film then the arson occurred on elm street and the movie is a sports film.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the movie is a sports film then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The movie is a sports film
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, as if the movie is a sports film then the arson occurred on elm street and the movie is a sports film.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the movie is a sports film then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The movie is a sports film
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the movie is a sports film then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, therefore the movie is not a sports film.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the movie is a sports film then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The movie is not a sports film
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the movie is a sports film then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, hence the movie is not a sports film.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the movie is a sports film then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The movie is not a sports film
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the movie is a sports film then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, thus the movie is not a sports film.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the movie is a sports film then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The movie is not a sports film
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the movie is a sports film then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so it can be concluded that the movie is not a sports film.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the movie is a sports film then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The movie is not a sports film
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the movie is a sports film then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so the movie is not a sports film.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the movie is a sports film then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The movie is not a sports film
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the movie is a sports film then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which implies that the movie is not a sports film.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the movie is a sports film then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The movie is not a sports film
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the movie is a sports film then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which shows that the movie is not a sports film.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the movie is a sports film then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The movie is not a sports film
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the movie is a sports film then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which establishes that the movie is not a sports film.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the movie is a sports film then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The movie is not a sports film
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The movie is not a sports film, since if the movie is a sports film then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the movie is a sports film then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The movie is not a sports film
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The movie is not a sports film, because if the movie is a sports film then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the movie is a sports film then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The movie is not a sports film
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The movie is not a sports film, as if the movie is a sports film then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the movie is a sports film then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The movie is not a sports film
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the weather is cloudy and rainy then the arson occurred on elm street, and the weather is cloudy and rainy, therefore the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the weather is cloudy and rainy then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The weather is cloudy and rainy
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the weather is cloudy and rainy then the arson occurred on elm street, and the weather is cloudy and rainy, hence the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the weather is cloudy and rainy then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The weather is cloudy and rainy
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the weather is cloudy and rainy then the arson occurred on elm street, and the weather is cloudy and rainy, thus the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the weather is cloudy and rainy then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The weather is cloudy and rainy
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the weather is cloudy and rainy then the arson occurred on elm street, and the weather is cloudy and rainy, so it can be concluded that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the weather is cloudy and rainy then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The weather is cloudy and rainy
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the weather is cloudy and rainy then the arson occurred on elm street, and the weather is cloudy and rainy, so the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the weather is cloudy and rainy then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The weather is cloudy and rainy
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the weather is cloudy and rainy then the arson occurred on elm street, and the weather is cloudy and rainy, which implies that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the weather is cloudy and rainy then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The weather is cloudy and rainy
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the weather is cloudy and rainy then the arson occurred on elm street, and the weather is cloudy and rainy, which shows that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the weather is cloudy and rainy then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The weather is cloudy and rainy
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the weather is cloudy and rainy then the arson occurred on elm street, and the weather is cloudy and rainy, which establishes that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the weather is cloudy and rainy then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The weather is cloudy and rainy
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, since if the weather is cloudy and rainy then the arson occurred on elm street and the weather is cloudy and rainy.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the weather is cloudy and rainy then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The weather is cloudy and rainy
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, because if the weather is cloudy and rainy then the arson occurred on elm street and the weather is cloudy and rainy.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the weather is cloudy and rainy then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The weather is cloudy and rainy
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, as if the weather is cloudy and rainy then the arson occurred on elm street and the weather is cloudy and rainy.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the weather is cloudy and rainy then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The weather is cloudy and rainy
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the weather is cloudy and rainy then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, therefore the weather is not cloudy and rainy.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the weather is cloudy and rainy then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The weather is not cloudy and rainy
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the weather is cloudy and rainy then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, hence the weather is not cloudy and rainy.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the weather is cloudy and rainy then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The weather is not cloudy and rainy
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the weather is cloudy and rainy then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, thus the weather is not cloudy and rainy.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the weather is cloudy and rainy then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The weather is not cloudy and rainy
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the weather is cloudy and rainy then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so it can be concluded that the weather is not cloudy and rainy.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the weather is cloudy and rainy then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The weather is not cloudy and rainy
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the weather is cloudy and rainy then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so the weather is not cloudy and rainy.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the weather is cloudy and rainy then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The weather is not cloudy and rainy
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the weather is cloudy and rainy then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which implies that the weather is not cloudy and rainy.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the weather is cloudy and rainy then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The weather is not cloudy and rainy
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the weather is cloudy and rainy then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which shows that the weather is not cloudy and rainy.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the weather is cloudy and rainy then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The weather is not cloudy and rainy
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the weather is cloudy and rainy then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which establishes that the weather is not cloudy and rainy.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the weather is cloudy and rainy then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The weather is not cloudy and rainy
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The weather is not cloudy and rainy, since if the weather is cloudy and rainy then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the weather is cloudy and rainy then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The weather is not cloudy and rainy
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The weather is not cloudy and rainy, because if the weather is cloudy and rainy then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the weather is cloudy and rainy then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The weather is not cloudy and rainy
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The weather is not cloudy and rainy, as if the weather is cloudy and rainy then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the weather is cloudy and rainy then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The weather is not cloudy and rainy
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the baby is crying in the stroller then the arson occurred on elm street, and the baby is crying in the stroller, therefore the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is crying in the stroller then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The baby is crying in the stroller
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the baby is crying in the stroller then the arson occurred on elm street, and the baby is crying in the stroller, hence the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is crying in the stroller then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The baby is crying in the stroller
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the baby is crying in the stroller then the arson occurred on elm street, and the baby is crying in the stroller, thus the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is crying in the stroller then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The baby is crying in the stroller
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the baby is crying in the stroller then the arson occurred on elm street, and the baby is crying in the stroller, so it can be concluded that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is crying in the stroller then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The baby is crying in the stroller
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the baby is crying in the stroller then the arson occurred on elm street, and the baby is crying in the stroller, so the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is crying in the stroller then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The baby is crying in the stroller
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the baby is crying in the stroller then the arson occurred on elm street, and the baby is crying in the stroller, which implies that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is crying in the stroller then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The baby is crying in the stroller
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the baby is crying in the stroller then the arson occurred on elm street, and the baby is crying in the stroller, which shows that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is crying in the stroller then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The baby is crying in the stroller
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the baby is crying in the stroller then the arson occurred on elm street, and the baby is crying in the stroller, which establishes that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is crying in the stroller then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The baby is crying in the stroller
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, since if the baby is crying in the stroller then the arson occurred on elm street and the baby is crying in the stroller.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is crying in the stroller then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The baby is crying in the stroller
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, because if the baby is crying in the stroller then the arson occurred on elm street and the baby is crying in the stroller.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is crying in the stroller then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The baby is crying in the stroller
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, as if the baby is crying in the stroller then the arson occurred on elm street and the baby is crying in the stroller.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is crying in the stroller then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The baby is crying in the stroller
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the baby is crying in the stroller then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, therefore the baby is not crying in the stroller.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is crying in the stroller then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The baby is not crying in the stroller
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the baby is crying in the stroller then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, hence the baby is not crying in the stroller.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is crying in the stroller then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The baby is not crying in the stroller
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the baby is crying in the stroller then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, thus the baby is not crying in the stroller.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is crying in the stroller then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The baby is not crying in the stroller
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the baby is crying in the stroller then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so it can be concluded that the baby is not crying in the stroller.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is crying in the stroller then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The baby is not crying in the stroller
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the baby is crying in the stroller then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so the baby is not crying in the stroller.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is crying in the stroller then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The baby is not crying in the stroller
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the baby is crying in the stroller then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which implies that the baby is not crying in the stroller.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is crying in the stroller then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The baby is not crying in the stroller
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the baby is crying in the stroller then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which shows that the baby is not crying in the stroller.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is crying in the stroller then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The baby is not crying in the stroller
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the baby is crying in the stroller then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which establishes that the baby is not crying in the stroller.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is crying in the stroller then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The baby is not crying in the stroller
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The baby is not crying in the stroller, since if the baby is crying in the stroller then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is crying in the stroller then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The baby is not crying in the stroller
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The baby is not crying in the stroller, because if the baby is crying in the stroller then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is crying in the stroller then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The baby is not crying in the stroller
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The baby is not crying in the stroller, as if the baby is crying in the stroller then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is crying in the stroller then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The baby is not crying in the stroller
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the cat is grooming itself in front of the mirror then the arson occurred on elm street, and the cat is grooming itself in front of the mirror, therefore the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the cat is grooming itself in front of the mirror then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The cat is grooming itself in front of the mirror
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the cat is grooming itself in front of the mirror then the arson occurred on elm street, and the cat is grooming itself in front of the mirror, hence the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the cat is grooming itself in front of the mirror then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The cat is grooming itself in front of the mirror
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the cat is grooming itself in front of the mirror then the arson occurred on elm street, and the cat is grooming itself in front of the mirror, thus the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the cat is grooming itself in front of the mirror then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The cat is grooming itself in front of the mirror
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the cat is grooming itself in front of the mirror then the arson occurred on elm street, and the cat is grooming itself in front of the mirror, so it can be concluded that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the cat is grooming itself in front of the mirror then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The cat is grooming itself in front of the mirror
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the cat is grooming itself in front of the mirror then the arson occurred on elm street, and the cat is grooming itself in front of the mirror, so the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the cat is grooming itself in front of the mirror then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The cat is grooming itself in front of the mirror
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the cat is grooming itself in front of the mirror then the arson occurred on elm street, and the cat is grooming itself in front of the mirror, which implies that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the cat is grooming itself in front of the mirror then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The cat is grooming itself in front of the mirror
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the cat is grooming itself in front of the mirror then the arson occurred on elm street, and the cat is grooming itself in front of the mirror, which shows that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the cat is grooming itself in front of the mirror then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The cat is grooming itself in front of the mirror
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the cat is grooming itself in front of the mirror then the arson occurred on elm street, and the cat is grooming itself in front of the mirror, which establishes that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the cat is grooming itself in front of the mirror then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The cat is grooming itself in front of the mirror
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, since if the cat is grooming itself in front of the mirror then the arson occurred on elm street and the cat is grooming itself in front of the mirror.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the cat is grooming itself in front of the mirror then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The cat is grooming itself in front of the mirror
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, because if the cat is grooming itself in front of the mirror then the arson occurred on elm street and the cat is grooming itself in front of the mirror.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the cat is grooming itself in front of the mirror then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The cat is grooming itself in front of the mirror
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, as if the cat is grooming itself in front of the mirror then the arson occurred on elm street and the cat is grooming itself in front of the mirror.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the cat is grooming itself in front of the mirror then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The cat is grooming itself in front of the mirror
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the cat is grooming itself in front of the mirror then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, therefore the cat is not grooming itself in front of the mirror.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the cat is grooming itself in front of the mirror then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The cat is not grooming itself in front of the mirror
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the cat is grooming itself in front of the mirror then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, hence the cat is not grooming itself in front of the mirror.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the cat is grooming itself in front of the mirror then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The cat is not grooming itself in front of the mirror
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the cat is grooming itself in front of the mirror then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, thus the cat is not grooming itself in front of the mirror.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the cat is grooming itself in front of the mirror then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The cat is not grooming itself in front of the mirror
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the cat is grooming itself in front of the mirror then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so it can be concluded that the cat is not grooming itself in front of the mirror.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the cat is grooming itself in front of the mirror then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The cat is not grooming itself in front of the mirror
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the cat is grooming itself in front of the mirror then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so the cat is not grooming itself in front of the mirror.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the cat is grooming itself in front of the mirror then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The cat is not grooming itself in front of the mirror
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the cat is grooming itself in front of the mirror then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which implies that the cat is not grooming itself in front of the mirror.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the cat is grooming itself in front of the mirror then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The cat is not grooming itself in front of the mirror
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the cat is grooming itself in front of the mirror then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which shows that the cat is not grooming itself in front of the mirror.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the cat is grooming itself in front of the mirror then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The cat is not grooming itself in front of the mirror
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the cat is grooming itself in front of the mirror then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which establishes that the cat is not grooming itself in front of the mirror.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the cat is grooming itself in front of the mirror then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The cat is not grooming itself in front of the mirror
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is not grooming itself in front of the mirror, since if the cat is grooming itself in front of the mirror then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the cat is grooming itself in front of the mirror then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The cat is not grooming itself in front of the mirror
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is not grooming itself in front of the mirror, because if the cat is grooming itself in front of the mirror then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the cat is grooming itself in front of the mirror then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The cat is not grooming itself in front of the mirror
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is not grooming itself in front of the mirror, as if the cat is grooming itself in front of the mirror then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the cat is grooming itself in front of the mirror then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The cat is not grooming itself in front of the mirror
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the dog is barking at the door then the arson occurred on elm street, and the dog is barking at the door, therefore the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the dog is barking at the door then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The dog is barking at the door
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the dog is barking at the door then the arson occurred on elm street, and the dog is barking at the door, hence the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the dog is barking at the door then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The dog is barking at the door
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the dog is barking at the door then the arson occurred on elm street, and the dog is barking at the door, thus the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the dog is barking at the door then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The dog is barking at the door
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the dog is barking at the door then the arson occurred on elm street, and the dog is barking at the door, so it can be concluded that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the dog is barking at the door then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The dog is barking at the door
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the dog is barking at the door then the arson occurred on elm street, and the dog is barking at the door, so the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the dog is barking at the door then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The dog is barking at the door
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the dog is barking at the door then the arson occurred on elm street, and the dog is barking at the door, which implies that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the dog is barking at the door then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The dog is barking at the door
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the dog is barking at the door then the arson occurred on elm street, and the dog is barking at the door, which shows that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the dog is barking at the door then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The dog is barking at the door
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the dog is barking at the door then the arson occurred on elm street, and the dog is barking at the door, which establishes that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the dog is barking at the door then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The dog is barking at the door
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, since if the dog is barking at the door then the arson occurred on elm street and the dog is barking at the door.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the dog is barking at the door then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The dog is barking at the door
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, because if the dog is barking at the door then the arson occurred on elm street and the dog is barking at the door.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the dog is barking at the door then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The dog is barking at the door
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, as if the dog is barking at the door then the arson occurred on elm street and the dog is barking at the door.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the dog is barking at the door then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The dog is barking at the door
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the dog is barking at the door then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, therefore the dog is not barking at the door.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the dog is barking at the door then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The dog is not barking at the door
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the dog is barking at the door then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, hence the dog is not barking at the door.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the dog is barking at the door then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The dog is not barking at the door
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the dog is barking at the door then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, thus the dog is not barking at the door.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the dog is barking at the door then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The dog is not barking at the door
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the dog is barking at the door then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so it can be concluded that the dog is not barking at the door.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the dog is barking at the door then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The dog is not barking at the door
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the dog is barking at the door then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so the dog is not barking at the door.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the dog is barking at the door then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The dog is not barking at the door
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the dog is barking at the door then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which implies that the dog is not barking at the door.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the dog is barking at the door then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The dog is not barking at the door
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the dog is barking at the door then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which shows that the dog is not barking at the door.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the dog is barking at the door then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The dog is not barking at the door
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the dog is barking at the door then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which establishes that the dog is not barking at the door.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the dog is barking at the door then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The dog is not barking at the door
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The dog is not barking at the door, since if the dog is barking at the door then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the dog is barking at the door then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The dog is not barking at the door
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The dog is not barking at the door, because if the dog is barking at the door then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the dog is barking at the door then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The dog is not barking at the door
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.