<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street, and officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene, therefore the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
stringlengths 355
1.02k
|
---|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The sun is not shining through the window, since if the sun is shining through the window then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the sun is shining through the window then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The sun is not shining through the window
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The sun is not shining through the window, because if the sun is shining through the window then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the sun is shining through the window then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The sun is not shining through the window
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The sun is not shining through the window, as if the sun is shining through the window then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the sun is shining through the window then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The sun is not shining through the window
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the cat is purring contentedly on my lap then the arson occurred on elm street, and the cat is purring contentedly on my lap, therefore the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the cat is purring contentedly on my lap then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The cat is purring contentedly on my lap
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the cat is purring contentedly on my lap then the arson occurred on elm street, and the cat is purring contentedly on my lap, hence the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the cat is purring contentedly on my lap then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The cat is purring contentedly on my lap
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the cat is purring contentedly on my lap then the arson occurred on elm street, and the cat is purring contentedly on my lap, thus the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the cat is purring contentedly on my lap then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The cat is purring contentedly on my lap
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the cat is purring contentedly on my lap then the arson occurred on elm street, and the cat is purring contentedly on my lap, so it can be concluded that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the cat is purring contentedly on my lap then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The cat is purring contentedly on my lap
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the cat is purring contentedly on my lap then the arson occurred on elm street, and the cat is purring contentedly on my lap, so the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the cat is purring contentedly on my lap then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The cat is purring contentedly on my lap
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the cat is purring contentedly on my lap then the arson occurred on elm street, and the cat is purring contentedly on my lap, which implies that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the cat is purring contentedly on my lap then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The cat is purring contentedly on my lap
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the cat is purring contentedly on my lap then the arson occurred on elm street, and the cat is purring contentedly on my lap, which shows that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the cat is purring contentedly on my lap then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The cat is purring contentedly on my lap
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the cat is purring contentedly on my lap then the arson occurred on elm street, and the cat is purring contentedly on my lap, which establishes that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the cat is purring contentedly on my lap then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The cat is purring contentedly on my lap
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, since if the cat is purring contentedly on my lap then the arson occurred on elm street and the cat is purring contentedly on my lap.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the cat is purring contentedly on my lap then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The cat is purring contentedly on my lap
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, because if the cat is purring contentedly on my lap then the arson occurred on elm street and the cat is purring contentedly on my lap.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the cat is purring contentedly on my lap then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The cat is purring contentedly on my lap
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, as if the cat is purring contentedly on my lap then the arson occurred on elm street and the cat is purring contentedly on my lap.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the cat is purring contentedly on my lap then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The cat is purring contentedly on my lap
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the cat is purring contentedly on my lap then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, therefore the cat is not purring contentedly on my lap.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the cat is purring contentedly on my lap then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The cat is not purring contentedly on my lap
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the cat is purring contentedly on my lap then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, hence the cat is not purring contentedly on my lap.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the cat is purring contentedly on my lap then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The cat is not purring contentedly on my lap
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the cat is purring contentedly on my lap then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, thus the cat is not purring contentedly on my lap.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the cat is purring contentedly on my lap then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The cat is not purring contentedly on my lap
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the cat is purring contentedly on my lap then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so it can be concluded that the cat is not purring contentedly on my lap.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the cat is purring contentedly on my lap then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The cat is not purring contentedly on my lap
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the cat is purring contentedly on my lap then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so the cat is not purring contentedly on my lap.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the cat is purring contentedly on my lap then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The cat is not purring contentedly on my lap
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the cat is purring contentedly on my lap then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which implies that the cat is not purring contentedly on my lap.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the cat is purring contentedly on my lap then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The cat is not purring contentedly on my lap
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the cat is purring contentedly on my lap then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which shows that the cat is not purring contentedly on my lap.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the cat is purring contentedly on my lap then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The cat is not purring contentedly on my lap
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the cat is purring contentedly on my lap then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which establishes that the cat is not purring contentedly on my lap.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the cat is purring contentedly on my lap then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The cat is not purring contentedly on my lap
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is not purring contentedly on my lap, since if the cat is purring contentedly on my lap then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the cat is purring contentedly on my lap then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The cat is not purring contentedly on my lap
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is not purring contentedly on my lap, because if the cat is purring contentedly on my lap then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the cat is purring contentedly on my lap then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The cat is not purring contentedly on my lap
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is not purring contentedly on my lap, as if the cat is purring contentedly on my lap then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the cat is purring contentedly on my lap then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The cat is not purring contentedly on my lap
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the baby is playing with a toy car then the arson occurred on elm street, and the baby is playing with a toy car, therefore the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is playing with a toy car then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The baby is playing with a toy car
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the baby is playing with a toy car then the arson occurred on elm street, and the baby is playing with a toy car, hence the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is playing with a toy car then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The baby is playing with a toy car
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the baby is playing with a toy car then the arson occurred on elm street, and the baby is playing with a toy car, thus the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is playing with a toy car then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The baby is playing with a toy car
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the baby is playing with a toy car then the arson occurred on elm street, and the baby is playing with a toy car, so it can be concluded that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is playing with a toy car then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The baby is playing with a toy car
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the baby is playing with a toy car then the arson occurred on elm street, and the baby is playing with a toy car, so the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is playing with a toy car then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The baby is playing with a toy car
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the baby is playing with a toy car then the arson occurred on elm street, and the baby is playing with a toy car, which implies that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is playing with a toy car then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The baby is playing with a toy car
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the baby is playing with a toy car then the arson occurred on elm street, and the baby is playing with a toy car, which shows that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is playing with a toy car then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The baby is playing with a toy car
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the baby is playing with a toy car then the arson occurred on elm street, and the baby is playing with a toy car, which establishes that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is playing with a toy car then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The baby is playing with a toy car
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, since if the baby is playing with a toy car then the arson occurred on elm street and the baby is playing with a toy car.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is playing with a toy car then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The baby is playing with a toy car
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, because if the baby is playing with a toy car then the arson occurred on elm street and the baby is playing with a toy car.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is playing with a toy car then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The baby is playing with a toy car
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, as if the baby is playing with a toy car then the arson occurred on elm street and the baby is playing with a toy car.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is playing with a toy car then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The baby is playing with a toy car
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the baby is playing with a toy car then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, therefore the baby is not playing with a toy car.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is playing with a toy car then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The baby is not playing with a toy car
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the baby is playing with a toy car then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, hence the baby is not playing with a toy car.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is playing with a toy car then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The baby is not playing with a toy car
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the baby is playing with a toy car then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, thus the baby is not playing with a toy car.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is playing with a toy car then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The baby is not playing with a toy car
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the baby is playing with a toy car then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so it can be concluded that the baby is not playing with a toy car.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is playing with a toy car then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The baby is not playing with a toy car
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the baby is playing with a toy car then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so the baby is not playing with a toy car.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is playing with a toy car then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The baby is not playing with a toy car
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the baby is playing with a toy car then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which implies that the baby is not playing with a toy car.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is playing with a toy car then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The baby is not playing with a toy car
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the baby is playing with a toy car then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which shows that the baby is not playing with a toy car.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is playing with a toy car then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The baby is not playing with a toy car
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the baby is playing with a toy car then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which establishes that the baby is not playing with a toy car.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is playing with a toy car then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The baby is not playing with a toy car
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The baby is not playing with a toy car, since if the baby is playing with a toy car then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is playing with a toy car then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The baby is not playing with a toy car
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The baby is not playing with a toy car, because if the baby is playing with a toy car then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is playing with a toy car then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The baby is not playing with a toy car
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The baby is not playing with a toy car, as if the baby is playing with a toy car then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is playing with a toy car then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The baby is not playing with a toy car
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the dog is barking at the mail truck then the arson occurred on elm street, and the dog is barking at the mail truck, therefore the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the dog is barking at the mail truck then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The dog is barking at the mail truck
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the dog is barking at the mail truck then the arson occurred on elm street, and the dog is barking at the mail truck, hence the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the dog is barking at the mail truck then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The dog is barking at the mail truck
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the dog is barking at the mail truck then the arson occurred on elm street, and the dog is barking at the mail truck, thus the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the dog is barking at the mail truck then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The dog is barking at the mail truck
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the dog is barking at the mail truck then the arson occurred on elm street, and the dog is barking at the mail truck, so it can be concluded that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the dog is barking at the mail truck then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The dog is barking at the mail truck
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the dog is barking at the mail truck then the arson occurred on elm street, and the dog is barking at the mail truck, so the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the dog is barking at the mail truck then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The dog is barking at the mail truck
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the dog is barking at the mail truck then the arson occurred on elm street, and the dog is barking at the mail truck, which implies that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the dog is barking at the mail truck then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The dog is barking at the mail truck
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the dog is barking at the mail truck then the arson occurred on elm street, and the dog is barking at the mail truck, which shows that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the dog is barking at the mail truck then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The dog is barking at the mail truck
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the dog is barking at the mail truck then the arson occurred on elm street, and the dog is barking at the mail truck, which establishes that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the dog is barking at the mail truck then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The dog is barking at the mail truck
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, since if the dog is barking at the mail truck then the arson occurred on elm street and the dog is barking at the mail truck.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the dog is barking at the mail truck then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The dog is barking at the mail truck
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, because if the dog is barking at the mail truck then the arson occurred on elm street and the dog is barking at the mail truck.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the dog is barking at the mail truck then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The dog is barking at the mail truck
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, as if the dog is barking at the mail truck then the arson occurred on elm street and the dog is barking at the mail truck.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the dog is barking at the mail truck then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The dog is barking at the mail truck
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the dog is barking at the mail truck then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, therefore the dog is not barking at the mail truck.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the dog is barking at the mail truck then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The dog is not barking at the mail truck
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the dog is barking at the mail truck then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, hence the dog is not barking at the mail truck.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the dog is barking at the mail truck then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The dog is not barking at the mail truck
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the dog is barking at the mail truck then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, thus the dog is not barking at the mail truck.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the dog is barking at the mail truck then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The dog is not barking at the mail truck
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the dog is barking at the mail truck then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so it can be concluded that the dog is not barking at the mail truck.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the dog is barking at the mail truck then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The dog is not barking at the mail truck
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the dog is barking at the mail truck then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so the dog is not barking at the mail truck.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the dog is barking at the mail truck then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The dog is not barking at the mail truck
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the dog is barking at the mail truck then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which implies that the dog is not barking at the mail truck.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the dog is barking at the mail truck then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The dog is not barking at the mail truck
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the dog is barking at the mail truck then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which shows that the dog is not barking at the mail truck.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the dog is barking at the mail truck then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The dog is not barking at the mail truck
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the dog is barking at the mail truck then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which establishes that the dog is not barking at the mail truck.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the dog is barking at the mail truck then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The dog is not barking at the mail truck
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The dog is not barking at the mail truck, since if the dog is barking at the mail truck then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the dog is barking at the mail truck then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The dog is not barking at the mail truck
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The dog is not barking at the mail truck, because if the dog is barking at the mail truck then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the dog is barking at the mail truck then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The dog is not barking at the mail truck
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The dog is not barking at the mail truck, as if the dog is barking at the mail truck then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the dog is barking at the mail truck then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The dog is not barking at the mail truck
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the book is a collection of short stories then the arson occurred on elm street, and the book is a collection of short stories, therefore the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the book is a collection of short stories then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The book is a collection of short stories
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the book is a collection of short stories then the arson occurred on elm street, and the book is a collection of short stories, hence the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the book is a collection of short stories then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The book is a collection of short stories
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the book is a collection of short stories then the arson occurred on elm street, and the book is a collection of short stories, thus the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the book is a collection of short stories then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The book is a collection of short stories
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the book is a collection of short stories then the arson occurred on elm street, and the book is a collection of short stories, so it can be concluded that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the book is a collection of short stories then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The book is a collection of short stories
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the book is a collection of short stories then the arson occurred on elm street, and the book is a collection of short stories, so the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the book is a collection of short stories then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The book is a collection of short stories
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the book is a collection of short stories then the arson occurred on elm street, and the book is a collection of short stories, which implies that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the book is a collection of short stories then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The book is a collection of short stories
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the book is a collection of short stories then the arson occurred on elm street, and the book is a collection of short stories, which shows that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the book is a collection of short stories then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The book is a collection of short stories
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the book is a collection of short stories then the arson occurred on elm street, and the book is a collection of short stories, which establishes that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the book is a collection of short stories then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The book is a collection of short stories
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, since if the book is a collection of short stories then the arson occurred on elm street and the book is a collection of short stories.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the book is a collection of short stories then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The book is a collection of short stories
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, because if the book is a collection of short stories then the arson occurred on elm street and the book is a collection of short stories.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the book is a collection of short stories then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The book is a collection of short stories
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, as if the book is a collection of short stories then the arson occurred on elm street and the book is a collection of short stories.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the book is a collection of short stories then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The book is a collection of short stories
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the book is a collection of short stories then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, therefore the book is not a collection of short stories.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the book is a collection of short stories then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The book is not a collection of short stories
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the book is a collection of short stories then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, hence the book is not a collection of short stories.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the book is a collection of short stories then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The book is not a collection of short stories
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the book is a collection of short stories then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, thus the book is not a collection of short stories.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the book is a collection of short stories then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The book is not a collection of short stories
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the book is a collection of short stories then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so it can be concluded that the book is not a collection of short stories.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the book is a collection of short stories then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The book is not a collection of short stories
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the book is a collection of short stories then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so the book is not a collection of short stories.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the book is a collection of short stories then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The book is not a collection of short stories
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the book is a collection of short stories then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which implies that the book is not a collection of short stories.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the book is a collection of short stories then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The book is not a collection of short stories
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the book is a collection of short stories then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which shows that the book is not a collection of short stories.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the book is a collection of short stories then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The book is not a collection of short stories
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the book is a collection of short stories then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which establishes that the book is not a collection of short stories.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the book is a collection of short stories then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The book is not a collection of short stories
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The book is not a collection of short stories, since if the book is a collection of short stories then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the book is a collection of short stories then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The book is not a collection of short stories
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The book is not a collection of short stories, because if the book is a collection of short stories then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the book is a collection of short stories then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The book is not a collection of short stories
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The book is not a collection of short stories, as if the book is a collection of short stories then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the book is a collection of short stories then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The book is not a collection of short stories
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the movie is a sports film then the arson occurred on elm street, and the movie is a sports film, therefore the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the movie is a sports film then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The movie is a sports film
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the movie is a sports film then the arson occurred on elm street, and the movie is a sports film, hence the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the movie is a sports film then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The movie is a sports film
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the movie is a sports film then the arson occurred on elm street, and the movie is a sports film, thus the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the movie is a sports film then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The movie is a sports film
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the movie is a sports film then the arson occurred on elm street, and the movie is a sports film, so it can be concluded that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the movie is a sports film then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The movie is a sports film
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the movie is a sports film then the arson occurred on elm street, and the movie is a sports film, so the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the movie is a sports film then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The movie is a sports film
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the movie is a sports film then the arson occurred on elm street, and the movie is a sports film, which implies that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the movie is a sports film then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The movie is a sports film
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the movie is a sports film then the arson occurred on elm street, and the movie is a sports film, which shows that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the movie is a sports film then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The movie is a sports film
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the movie is a sports film then the arson occurred on elm street, and the movie is a sports film, which establishes that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the movie is a sports film then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The movie is a sports film
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, since if the movie is a sports film then the arson occurred on elm street and the movie is a sports film.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the movie is a sports film then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The movie is a sports film
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.