<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street, and officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene, therefore the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
stringlengths 355
1.02k
|
|---|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the dog is barking at the stranger then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which shows that the dog is not barking at the stranger.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the dog is barking at the stranger then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The dog is not barking at the stranger
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the dog is barking at the stranger then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which establishes that the dog is not barking at the stranger.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the dog is barking at the stranger then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The dog is not barking at the stranger
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The dog is not barking at the stranger, since if the dog is barking at the stranger then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the dog is barking at the stranger then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The dog is not barking at the stranger
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The dog is not barking at the stranger, because if the dog is barking at the stranger then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the dog is barking at the stranger then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The dog is not barking at the stranger
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The dog is not barking at the stranger, as if the dog is barking at the stranger then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the dog is barking at the stranger then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The dog is not barking at the stranger
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the book is a memoir then the arson occurred on elm street, and the book is a memoir, therefore the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the book is a memoir then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The book is a memoir
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the book is a memoir then the arson occurred on elm street, and the book is a memoir, hence the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the book is a memoir then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The book is a memoir
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the book is a memoir then the arson occurred on elm street, and the book is a memoir, thus the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the book is a memoir then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The book is a memoir
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the book is a memoir then the arson occurred on elm street, and the book is a memoir, so it can be concluded that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the book is a memoir then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The book is a memoir
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the book is a memoir then the arson occurred on elm street, and the book is a memoir, so the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the book is a memoir then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The book is a memoir
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the book is a memoir then the arson occurred on elm street, and the book is a memoir, which implies that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the book is a memoir then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The book is a memoir
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the book is a memoir then the arson occurred on elm street, and the book is a memoir, which shows that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the book is a memoir then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The book is a memoir
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the book is a memoir then the arson occurred on elm street, and the book is a memoir, which establishes that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the book is a memoir then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The book is a memoir
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, since if the book is a memoir then the arson occurred on elm street and the book is a memoir.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the book is a memoir then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The book is a memoir
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, because if the book is a memoir then the arson occurred on elm street and the book is a memoir.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the book is a memoir then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The book is a memoir
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, as if the book is a memoir then the arson occurred on elm street and the book is a memoir.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the book is a memoir then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The book is a memoir
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the book is a memoir then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, therefore the book is not a memoir.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the book is a memoir then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The book is not a memoir
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the book is a memoir then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, hence the book is not a memoir.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the book is a memoir then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The book is not a memoir
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the book is a memoir then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, thus the book is not a memoir.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the book is a memoir then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The book is not a memoir
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the book is a memoir then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so it can be concluded that the book is not a memoir.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the book is a memoir then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The book is not a memoir
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the book is a memoir then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so the book is not a memoir.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the book is a memoir then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The book is not a memoir
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the book is a memoir then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which implies that the book is not a memoir.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the book is a memoir then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The book is not a memoir
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the book is a memoir then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which shows that the book is not a memoir.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the book is a memoir then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The book is not a memoir
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the book is a memoir then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which establishes that the book is not a memoir.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the book is a memoir then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The book is not a memoir
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The book is not a memoir, since if the book is a memoir then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the book is a memoir then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The book is not a memoir
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The book is not a memoir, because if the book is a memoir then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the book is a memoir then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The book is not a memoir
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The book is not a memoir, as if the book is a memoir then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the book is a memoir then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The book is not a memoir
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the movie is a documentary then the arson occurred on elm street, and the movie is a documentary, therefore the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the movie is a documentary then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The movie is a documentary
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the movie is a documentary then the arson occurred on elm street, and the movie is a documentary, hence the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the movie is a documentary then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The movie is a documentary
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the movie is a documentary then the arson occurred on elm street, and the movie is a documentary, thus the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the movie is a documentary then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The movie is a documentary
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the movie is a documentary then the arson occurred on elm street, and the movie is a documentary, so it can be concluded that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the movie is a documentary then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The movie is a documentary
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the movie is a documentary then the arson occurred on elm street, and the movie is a documentary, so the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the movie is a documentary then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The movie is a documentary
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the movie is a documentary then the arson occurred on elm street, and the movie is a documentary, which implies that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the movie is a documentary then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The movie is a documentary
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the movie is a documentary then the arson occurred on elm street, and the movie is a documentary, which shows that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the movie is a documentary then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The movie is a documentary
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the movie is a documentary then the arson occurred on elm street, and the movie is a documentary, which establishes that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the movie is a documentary then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The movie is a documentary
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, since if the movie is a documentary then the arson occurred on elm street and the movie is a documentary.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the movie is a documentary then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The movie is a documentary
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, because if the movie is a documentary then the arson occurred on elm street and the movie is a documentary.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the movie is a documentary then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The movie is a documentary
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, as if the movie is a documentary then the arson occurred on elm street and the movie is a documentary.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the movie is a documentary then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The movie is a documentary
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the movie is a documentary then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, therefore the movie is not a documentary.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the movie is a documentary then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The movie is not a documentary
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the movie is a documentary then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, hence the movie is not a documentary.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the movie is a documentary then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The movie is not a documentary
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the movie is a documentary then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, thus the movie is not a documentary.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the movie is a documentary then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The movie is not a documentary
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the movie is a documentary then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so it can be concluded that the movie is not a documentary.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the movie is a documentary then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The movie is not a documentary
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the movie is a documentary then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so the movie is not a documentary.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the movie is a documentary then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The movie is not a documentary
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the movie is a documentary then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which implies that the movie is not a documentary.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the movie is a documentary then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The movie is not a documentary
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the movie is a documentary then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which shows that the movie is not a documentary.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the movie is a documentary then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The movie is not a documentary
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the movie is a documentary then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which establishes that the movie is not a documentary.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the movie is a documentary then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The movie is not a documentary
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The movie is not a documentary, since if the movie is a documentary then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the movie is a documentary then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The movie is not a documentary
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The movie is not a documentary, because if the movie is a documentary then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the movie is a documentary then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The movie is not a documentary
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The movie is not a documentary, as if the movie is a documentary then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the movie is a documentary then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The movie is not a documentary
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the weather is hot and humid then the arson occurred on elm street, and the weather is hot and humid, therefore the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the weather is hot and humid then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The weather is hot and humid
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the weather is hot and humid then the arson occurred on elm street, and the weather is hot and humid, hence the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the weather is hot and humid then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The weather is hot and humid
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the weather is hot and humid then the arson occurred on elm street, and the weather is hot and humid, thus the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the weather is hot and humid then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The weather is hot and humid
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the weather is hot and humid then the arson occurred on elm street, and the weather is hot and humid, so it can be concluded that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the weather is hot and humid then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The weather is hot and humid
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the weather is hot and humid then the arson occurred on elm street, and the weather is hot and humid, so the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the weather is hot and humid then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The weather is hot and humid
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the weather is hot and humid then the arson occurred on elm street, and the weather is hot and humid, which implies that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the weather is hot and humid then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The weather is hot and humid
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the weather is hot and humid then the arson occurred on elm street, and the weather is hot and humid, which shows that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the weather is hot and humid then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The weather is hot and humid
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the weather is hot and humid then the arson occurred on elm street, and the weather is hot and humid, which establishes that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the weather is hot and humid then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The weather is hot and humid
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, since if the weather is hot and humid then the arson occurred on elm street and the weather is hot and humid.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the weather is hot and humid then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The weather is hot and humid
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, because if the weather is hot and humid then the arson occurred on elm street and the weather is hot and humid.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the weather is hot and humid then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The weather is hot and humid
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, as if the weather is hot and humid then the arson occurred on elm street and the weather is hot and humid.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the weather is hot and humid then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The weather is hot and humid
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the weather is hot and humid then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, therefore the weather is not hot and humid.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the weather is hot and humid then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The weather is not hot and humid
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the weather is hot and humid then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, hence the weather is not hot and humid.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the weather is hot and humid then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The weather is not hot and humid
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the weather is hot and humid then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, thus the weather is not hot and humid.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the weather is hot and humid then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The weather is not hot and humid
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the weather is hot and humid then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so it can be concluded that the weather is not hot and humid.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the weather is hot and humid then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The weather is not hot and humid
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the weather is hot and humid then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so the weather is not hot and humid.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the weather is hot and humid then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The weather is not hot and humid
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the weather is hot and humid then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which implies that the weather is not hot and humid.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the weather is hot and humid then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The weather is not hot and humid
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the weather is hot and humid then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which shows that the weather is not hot and humid.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the weather is hot and humid then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The weather is not hot and humid
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the weather is hot and humid then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which establishes that the weather is not hot and humid.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the weather is hot and humid then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The weather is not hot and humid
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The weather is not hot and humid, since if the weather is hot and humid then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the weather is hot and humid then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The weather is not hot and humid
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The weather is not hot and humid, because if the weather is hot and humid then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the weather is hot and humid then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The weather is not hot and humid
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The weather is not hot and humid, as if the weather is hot and humid then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the weather is hot and humid then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The weather is not hot and humid
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the baby is drinking from a bottle then the arson occurred on elm street, and the baby is drinking from a bottle, therefore the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is drinking from a bottle then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The baby is drinking from a bottle
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the baby is drinking from a bottle then the arson occurred on elm street, and the baby is drinking from a bottle, hence the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is drinking from a bottle then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The baby is drinking from a bottle
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the baby is drinking from a bottle then the arson occurred on elm street, and the baby is drinking from a bottle, thus the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is drinking from a bottle then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The baby is drinking from a bottle
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the baby is drinking from a bottle then the arson occurred on elm street, and the baby is drinking from a bottle, so it can be concluded that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is drinking from a bottle then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The baby is drinking from a bottle
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the baby is drinking from a bottle then the arson occurred on elm street, and the baby is drinking from a bottle, so the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is drinking from a bottle then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The baby is drinking from a bottle
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the baby is drinking from a bottle then the arson occurred on elm street, and the baby is drinking from a bottle, which implies that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is drinking from a bottle then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The baby is drinking from a bottle
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the baby is drinking from a bottle then the arson occurred on elm street, and the baby is drinking from a bottle, which shows that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is drinking from a bottle then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The baby is drinking from a bottle
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the baby is drinking from a bottle then the arson occurred on elm street, and the baby is drinking from a bottle, which establishes that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is drinking from a bottle then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The baby is drinking from a bottle
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, since if the baby is drinking from a bottle then the arson occurred on elm street and the baby is drinking from a bottle.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is drinking from a bottle then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The baby is drinking from a bottle
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, because if the baby is drinking from a bottle then the arson occurred on elm street and the baby is drinking from a bottle.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is drinking from a bottle then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The baby is drinking from a bottle
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, as if the baby is drinking from a bottle then the arson occurred on elm street and the baby is drinking from a bottle.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is drinking from a bottle then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The baby is drinking from a bottle
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the baby is drinking from a bottle then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, therefore the baby is not drinking from a bottle.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is drinking from a bottle then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The baby is not drinking from a bottle
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the baby is drinking from a bottle then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, hence the baby is not drinking from a bottle.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is drinking from a bottle then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The baby is not drinking from a bottle
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the baby is drinking from a bottle then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, thus the baby is not drinking from a bottle.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is drinking from a bottle then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The baby is not drinking from a bottle
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the baby is drinking from a bottle then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so it can be concluded that the baby is not drinking from a bottle.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is drinking from a bottle then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The baby is not drinking from a bottle
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the baby is drinking from a bottle then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so the baby is not drinking from a bottle.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is drinking from a bottle then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The baby is not drinking from a bottle
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the baby is drinking from a bottle then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which implies that the baby is not drinking from a bottle.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is drinking from a bottle then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The baby is not drinking from a bottle
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the baby is drinking from a bottle then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which shows that the baby is not drinking from a bottle.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is drinking from a bottle then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The baby is not drinking from a bottle
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the baby is drinking from a bottle then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which establishes that the baby is not drinking from a bottle.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is drinking from a bottle then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The baby is not drinking from a bottle
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The baby is not drinking from a bottle, since if the baby is drinking from a bottle then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is drinking from a bottle then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The baby is not drinking from a bottle
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The baby is not drinking from a bottle, because if the baby is drinking from a bottle then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is drinking from a bottle then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The baby is not drinking from a bottle
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The baby is not drinking from a bottle, as if the baby is drinking from a bottle then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is drinking from a bottle then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The baby is not drinking from a bottle
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the cat is sleeping on the couch then the arson occurred on elm street, and the cat is sleeping on the couch, therefore the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the cat is sleeping on the couch then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The cat is sleeping on the couch
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the cat is sleeping on the couch then the arson occurred on elm street, and the cat is sleeping on the couch, hence the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the cat is sleeping on the couch then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The cat is sleeping on the couch
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the cat is sleeping on the couch then the arson occurred on elm street, and the cat is sleeping on the couch, thus the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the cat is sleeping on the couch then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The cat is sleeping on the couch
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the cat is sleeping on the couch then the arson occurred on elm street, and the cat is sleeping on the couch, so it can be concluded that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the cat is sleeping on the couch then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The cat is sleeping on the couch
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the cat is sleeping on the couch then the arson occurred on elm street, and the cat is sleeping on the couch, so the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the cat is sleeping on the couch then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The cat is sleeping on the couch
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the cat is sleeping on the couch then the arson occurred on elm street, and the cat is sleeping on the couch, which implies that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the cat is sleeping on the couch then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The cat is sleeping on the couch
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the cat is sleeping on the couch then the arson occurred on elm street, and the cat is sleeping on the couch, which shows that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the cat is sleeping on the couch then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The cat is sleeping on the couch
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.