<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street, and officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene, therefore the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
stringlengths 355
1.02k
|
|---|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the movie is a comedy-drama then the arson occurred on elm street, and the movie is a comedy-drama, which implies that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the movie is a comedy-drama then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The movie is a comedy-drama
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the movie is a comedy-drama then the arson occurred on elm street, and the movie is a comedy-drama, which shows that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the movie is a comedy-drama then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The movie is a comedy-drama
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the movie is a comedy-drama then the arson occurred on elm street, and the movie is a comedy-drama, which establishes that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the movie is a comedy-drama then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The movie is a comedy-drama
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, since if the movie is a comedy-drama then the arson occurred on elm street and the movie is a comedy-drama.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the movie is a comedy-drama then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The movie is a comedy-drama
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, because if the movie is a comedy-drama then the arson occurred on elm street and the movie is a comedy-drama.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the movie is a comedy-drama then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The movie is a comedy-drama
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, as if the movie is a comedy-drama then the arson occurred on elm street and the movie is a comedy-drama.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the movie is a comedy-drama then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The movie is a comedy-drama
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the movie is a comedy-drama then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, therefore the movie is not a comedy-drama.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the movie is a comedy-drama then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The movie is not a comedy-drama
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the movie is a comedy-drama then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, hence the movie is not a comedy-drama.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the movie is a comedy-drama then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The movie is not a comedy-drama
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the movie is a comedy-drama then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, thus the movie is not a comedy-drama.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the movie is a comedy-drama then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The movie is not a comedy-drama
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the movie is a comedy-drama then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so it can be concluded that the movie is not a comedy-drama.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the movie is a comedy-drama then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The movie is not a comedy-drama
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the movie is a comedy-drama then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so the movie is not a comedy-drama.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the movie is a comedy-drama then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The movie is not a comedy-drama
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the movie is a comedy-drama then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which implies that the movie is not a comedy-drama.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the movie is a comedy-drama then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The movie is not a comedy-drama
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the movie is a comedy-drama then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which shows that the movie is not a comedy-drama.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the movie is a comedy-drama then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The movie is not a comedy-drama
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the movie is a comedy-drama then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which establishes that the movie is not a comedy-drama.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the movie is a comedy-drama then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The movie is not a comedy-drama
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The movie is not a comedy-drama, since if the movie is a comedy-drama then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the movie is a comedy-drama then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The movie is not a comedy-drama
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The movie is not a comedy-drama, because if the movie is a comedy-drama then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the movie is a comedy-drama then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The movie is not a comedy-drama
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The movie is not a comedy-drama, as if the movie is a comedy-drama then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the movie is a comedy-drama then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The movie is not a comedy-drama
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the sun is shining brightly overhead then the arson occurred on elm street, and the sun is shining brightly overhead, therefore the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the sun is shining brightly overhead then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The sun is shining brightly overhead
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the sun is shining brightly overhead then the arson occurred on elm street, and the sun is shining brightly overhead, hence the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the sun is shining brightly overhead then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The sun is shining brightly overhead
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the sun is shining brightly overhead then the arson occurred on elm street, and the sun is shining brightly overhead, thus the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the sun is shining brightly overhead then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The sun is shining brightly overhead
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the sun is shining brightly overhead then the arson occurred on elm street, and the sun is shining brightly overhead, so it can be concluded that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the sun is shining brightly overhead then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The sun is shining brightly overhead
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the sun is shining brightly overhead then the arson occurred on elm street, and the sun is shining brightly overhead, so the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the sun is shining brightly overhead then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The sun is shining brightly overhead
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the sun is shining brightly overhead then the arson occurred on elm street, and the sun is shining brightly overhead, which implies that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the sun is shining brightly overhead then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The sun is shining brightly overhead
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the sun is shining brightly overhead then the arson occurred on elm street, and the sun is shining brightly overhead, which shows that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the sun is shining brightly overhead then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The sun is shining brightly overhead
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the sun is shining brightly overhead then the arson occurred on elm street, and the sun is shining brightly overhead, which establishes that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the sun is shining brightly overhead then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The sun is shining brightly overhead
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, since if the sun is shining brightly overhead then the arson occurred on elm street and the sun is shining brightly overhead.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the sun is shining brightly overhead then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The sun is shining brightly overhead
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, because if the sun is shining brightly overhead then the arson occurred on elm street and the sun is shining brightly overhead.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the sun is shining brightly overhead then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The sun is shining brightly overhead
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, as if the sun is shining brightly overhead then the arson occurred on elm street and the sun is shining brightly overhead.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the sun is shining brightly overhead then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The sun is shining brightly overhead
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the sun is shining brightly overhead then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, therefore the sun is not shining brightly overhead.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the sun is shining brightly overhead then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The sun is not shining brightly overhead
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the sun is shining brightly overhead then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, hence the sun is not shining brightly overhead.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the sun is shining brightly overhead then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The sun is not shining brightly overhead
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the sun is shining brightly overhead then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, thus the sun is not shining brightly overhead.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the sun is shining brightly overhead then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The sun is not shining brightly overhead
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the sun is shining brightly overhead then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so it can be concluded that the sun is not shining brightly overhead.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the sun is shining brightly overhead then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The sun is not shining brightly overhead
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the sun is shining brightly overhead then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so the sun is not shining brightly overhead.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the sun is shining brightly overhead then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The sun is not shining brightly overhead
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the sun is shining brightly overhead then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which implies that the sun is not shining brightly overhead.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the sun is shining brightly overhead then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The sun is not shining brightly overhead
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the sun is shining brightly overhead then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which shows that the sun is not shining brightly overhead.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the sun is shining brightly overhead then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The sun is not shining brightly overhead
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the sun is shining brightly overhead then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which establishes that the sun is not shining brightly overhead.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the sun is shining brightly overhead then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The sun is not shining brightly overhead
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The sun is not shining brightly overhead, since if the sun is shining brightly overhead then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the sun is shining brightly overhead then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The sun is not shining brightly overhead
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The sun is not shining brightly overhead, because if the sun is shining brightly overhead then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the sun is shining brightly overhead then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The sun is not shining brightly overhead
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The sun is not shining brightly overhead, as if the sun is shining brightly overhead then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the sun is shining brightly overhead then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The sun is not shining brightly overhead
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the cat is purring loudly then the arson occurred on elm street, and the cat is purring loudly, therefore the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the cat is purring loudly then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The cat is purring loudly
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the cat is purring loudly then the arson occurred on elm street, and the cat is purring loudly, hence the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the cat is purring loudly then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The cat is purring loudly
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the cat is purring loudly then the arson occurred on elm street, and the cat is purring loudly, thus the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the cat is purring loudly then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The cat is purring loudly
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the cat is purring loudly then the arson occurred on elm street, and the cat is purring loudly, so it can be concluded that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the cat is purring loudly then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The cat is purring loudly
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the cat is purring loudly then the arson occurred on elm street, and the cat is purring loudly, so the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the cat is purring loudly then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The cat is purring loudly
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the cat is purring loudly then the arson occurred on elm street, and the cat is purring loudly, which implies that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the cat is purring loudly then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The cat is purring loudly
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the cat is purring loudly then the arson occurred on elm street, and the cat is purring loudly, which shows that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the cat is purring loudly then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The cat is purring loudly
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the cat is purring loudly then the arson occurred on elm street, and the cat is purring loudly, which establishes that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the cat is purring loudly then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The cat is purring loudly
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, since if the cat is purring loudly then the arson occurred on elm street and the cat is purring loudly.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the cat is purring loudly then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The cat is purring loudly
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, because if the cat is purring loudly then the arson occurred on elm street and the cat is purring loudly.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the cat is purring loudly then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The cat is purring loudly
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, as if the cat is purring loudly then the arson occurred on elm street and the cat is purring loudly.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the cat is purring loudly then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The cat is purring loudly
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the cat is purring loudly then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, therefore the cat is not purring loudly.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the cat is purring loudly then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The cat is not purring loudly
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the cat is purring loudly then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, hence the cat is not purring loudly.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the cat is purring loudly then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The cat is not purring loudly
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the cat is purring loudly then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, thus the cat is not purring loudly.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the cat is purring loudly then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The cat is not purring loudly
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the cat is purring loudly then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so it can be concluded that the cat is not purring loudly.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the cat is purring loudly then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The cat is not purring loudly
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the cat is purring loudly then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so the cat is not purring loudly.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the cat is purring loudly then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The cat is not purring loudly
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the cat is purring loudly then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which implies that the cat is not purring loudly.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the cat is purring loudly then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The cat is not purring loudly
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the cat is purring loudly then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which shows that the cat is not purring loudly.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the cat is purring loudly then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The cat is not purring loudly
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the cat is purring loudly then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which establishes that the cat is not purring loudly.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the cat is purring loudly then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The cat is not purring loudly
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is not purring loudly, since if the cat is purring loudly then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the cat is purring loudly then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The cat is not purring loudly
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is not purring loudly, because if the cat is purring loudly then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the cat is purring loudly then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The cat is not purring loudly
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is not purring loudly, as if the cat is purring loudly then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the cat is purring loudly then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The cat is not purring loudly
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the baby is crawling towards the toy then the arson occurred on elm street, and the baby is crawling towards the toy, therefore the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is crawling towards the toy then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The baby is crawling towards the toy
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the baby is crawling towards the toy then the arson occurred on elm street, and the baby is crawling towards the toy, hence the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is crawling towards the toy then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The baby is crawling towards the toy
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the baby is crawling towards the toy then the arson occurred on elm street, and the baby is crawling towards the toy, thus the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is crawling towards the toy then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The baby is crawling towards the toy
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the baby is crawling towards the toy then the arson occurred on elm street, and the baby is crawling towards the toy, so it can be concluded that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is crawling towards the toy then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The baby is crawling towards the toy
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the baby is crawling towards the toy then the arson occurred on elm street, and the baby is crawling towards the toy, so the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is crawling towards the toy then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The baby is crawling towards the toy
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the baby is crawling towards the toy then the arson occurred on elm street, and the baby is crawling towards the toy, which implies that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is crawling towards the toy then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The baby is crawling towards the toy
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the baby is crawling towards the toy then the arson occurred on elm street, and the baby is crawling towards the toy, which shows that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is crawling towards the toy then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The baby is crawling towards the toy
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the baby is crawling towards the toy then the arson occurred on elm street, and the baby is crawling towards the toy, which establishes that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is crawling towards the toy then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The baby is crawling towards the toy
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, since if the baby is crawling towards the toy then the arson occurred on elm street and the baby is crawling towards the toy.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is crawling towards the toy then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The baby is crawling towards the toy
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, because if the baby is crawling towards the toy then the arson occurred on elm street and the baby is crawling towards the toy.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is crawling towards the toy then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The baby is crawling towards the toy
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, as if the baby is crawling towards the toy then the arson occurred on elm street and the baby is crawling towards the toy.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is crawling towards the toy then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The baby is crawling towards the toy
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the baby is crawling towards the toy then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, therefore the baby is not crawling towards the toy.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is crawling towards the toy then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The baby is not crawling towards the toy
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the baby is crawling towards the toy then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, hence the baby is not crawling towards the toy.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is crawling towards the toy then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The baby is not crawling towards the toy
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the baby is crawling towards the toy then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, thus the baby is not crawling towards the toy.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is crawling towards the toy then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The baby is not crawling towards the toy
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the baby is crawling towards the toy then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so it can be concluded that the baby is not crawling towards the toy.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is crawling towards the toy then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The baby is not crawling towards the toy
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the baby is crawling towards the toy then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so the baby is not crawling towards the toy.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is crawling towards the toy then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The baby is not crawling towards the toy
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the baby is crawling towards the toy then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which implies that the baby is not crawling towards the toy.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is crawling towards the toy then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The baby is not crawling towards the toy
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the baby is crawling towards the toy then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which shows that the baby is not crawling towards the toy.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is crawling towards the toy then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The baby is not crawling towards the toy
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the baby is crawling towards the toy then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which establishes that the baby is not crawling towards the toy.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is crawling towards the toy then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The baby is not crawling towards the toy
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The baby is not crawling towards the toy, since if the baby is crawling towards the toy then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is crawling towards the toy then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The baby is not crawling towards the toy
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The baby is not crawling towards the toy, because if the baby is crawling towards the toy then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is crawling towards the toy then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The baby is not crawling towards the toy
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The baby is not crawling towards the toy, as if the baby is crawling towards the toy then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is crawling towards the toy then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The baby is not crawling towards the toy
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the dog is barking at the stranger then the arson occurred on elm street, and the dog is barking at the stranger, therefore the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the dog is barking at the stranger then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The dog is barking at the stranger
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the dog is barking at the stranger then the arson occurred on elm street, and the dog is barking at the stranger, hence the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the dog is barking at the stranger then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The dog is barking at the stranger
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the dog is barking at the stranger then the arson occurred on elm street, and the dog is barking at the stranger, thus the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the dog is barking at the stranger then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The dog is barking at the stranger
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the dog is barking at the stranger then the arson occurred on elm street, and the dog is barking at the stranger, so it can be concluded that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the dog is barking at the stranger then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The dog is barking at the stranger
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the dog is barking at the stranger then the arson occurred on elm street, and the dog is barking at the stranger, so the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the dog is barking at the stranger then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The dog is barking at the stranger
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the dog is barking at the stranger then the arson occurred on elm street, and the dog is barking at the stranger, which implies that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the dog is barking at the stranger then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The dog is barking at the stranger
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the dog is barking at the stranger then the arson occurred on elm street, and the dog is barking at the stranger, which shows that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the dog is barking at the stranger then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The dog is barking at the stranger
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the dog is barking at the stranger then the arson occurred on elm street, and the dog is barking at the stranger, which establishes that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the dog is barking at the stranger then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The dog is barking at the stranger
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, since if the dog is barking at the stranger then the arson occurred on elm street and the dog is barking at the stranger.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the dog is barking at the stranger then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The dog is barking at the stranger
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, because if the dog is barking at the stranger then the arson occurred on elm street and the dog is barking at the stranger.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the dog is barking at the stranger then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The dog is barking at the stranger
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, as if the dog is barking at the stranger then the arson occurred on elm street and the dog is barking at the stranger.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the dog is barking at the stranger then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The dog is barking at the stranger
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the dog is barking at the stranger then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, therefore the dog is not barking at the stranger.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the dog is barking at the stranger then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The dog is not barking at the stranger
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the dog is barking at the stranger then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, hence the dog is not barking at the stranger.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the dog is barking at the stranger then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The dog is not barking at the stranger
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the dog is barking at the stranger then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, thus the dog is not barking at the stranger.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the dog is barking at the stranger then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The dog is not barking at the stranger
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the dog is barking at the stranger then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so it can be concluded that the dog is not barking at the stranger.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the dog is barking at the stranger then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The dog is not barking at the stranger
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the dog is barking at the stranger then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so the dog is not barking at the stranger.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the dog is barking at the stranger then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The dog is not barking at the stranger
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the dog is barking at the stranger then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which implies that the dog is not barking at the stranger.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the dog is barking at the stranger then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The dog is not barking at the stranger
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.