<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street, and officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene, therefore the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
stringlengths 355
1.02k
|
|---|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the baby is playing with blocks then the arson occurred on elm street, and the baby is playing with blocks, so it can be concluded that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is playing with blocks then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The baby is playing with blocks
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the baby is playing with blocks then the arson occurred on elm street, and the baby is playing with blocks, so the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is playing with blocks then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The baby is playing with blocks
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the baby is playing with blocks then the arson occurred on elm street, and the baby is playing with blocks, which implies that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is playing with blocks then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The baby is playing with blocks
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the baby is playing with blocks then the arson occurred on elm street, and the baby is playing with blocks, which shows that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is playing with blocks then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The baby is playing with blocks
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the baby is playing with blocks then the arson occurred on elm street, and the baby is playing with blocks, which establishes that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is playing with blocks then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The baby is playing with blocks
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, since if the baby is playing with blocks then the arson occurred on elm street and the baby is playing with blocks.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is playing with blocks then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The baby is playing with blocks
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, because if the baby is playing with blocks then the arson occurred on elm street and the baby is playing with blocks.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is playing with blocks then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The baby is playing with blocks
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, as if the baby is playing with blocks then the arson occurred on elm street and the baby is playing with blocks.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is playing with blocks then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The baby is playing with blocks
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the baby is playing with blocks then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, therefore the baby is not playing with blocks.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is playing with blocks then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The baby is not playing with blocks
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the baby is playing with blocks then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, hence the baby is not playing with blocks.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is playing with blocks then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The baby is not playing with blocks
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the baby is playing with blocks then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, thus the baby is not playing with blocks.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is playing with blocks then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The baby is not playing with blocks
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the baby is playing with blocks then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so it can be concluded that the baby is not playing with blocks.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is playing with blocks then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The baby is not playing with blocks
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the baby is playing with blocks then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so the baby is not playing with blocks.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is playing with blocks then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The baby is not playing with blocks
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the baby is playing with blocks then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which implies that the baby is not playing with blocks.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is playing with blocks then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The baby is not playing with blocks
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the baby is playing with blocks then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which shows that the baby is not playing with blocks.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is playing with blocks then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The baby is not playing with blocks
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the baby is playing with blocks then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which establishes that the baby is not playing with blocks.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is playing with blocks then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The baby is not playing with blocks
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The baby is not playing with blocks, since if the baby is playing with blocks then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is playing with blocks then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The baby is not playing with blocks
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The baby is not playing with blocks, because if the baby is playing with blocks then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is playing with blocks then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The baby is not playing with blocks
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The baby is not playing with blocks, as if the baby is playing with blocks then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is playing with blocks then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The baby is not playing with blocks
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the dog is barking at the mailman then the arson occurred on elm street, and the dog is barking at the mailman, therefore the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the dog is barking at the mailman then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The dog is barking at the mailman
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the dog is barking at the mailman then the arson occurred on elm street, and the dog is barking at the mailman, hence the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the dog is barking at the mailman then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The dog is barking at the mailman
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the dog is barking at the mailman then the arson occurred on elm street, and the dog is barking at the mailman, thus the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the dog is barking at the mailman then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The dog is barking at the mailman
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the dog is barking at the mailman then the arson occurred on elm street, and the dog is barking at the mailman, so it can be concluded that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the dog is barking at the mailman then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The dog is barking at the mailman
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the dog is barking at the mailman then the arson occurred on elm street, and the dog is barking at the mailman, so the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the dog is barking at the mailman then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The dog is barking at the mailman
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the dog is barking at the mailman then the arson occurred on elm street, and the dog is barking at the mailman, which implies that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the dog is barking at the mailman then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The dog is barking at the mailman
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the dog is barking at the mailman then the arson occurred on elm street, and the dog is barking at the mailman, which shows that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the dog is barking at the mailman then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The dog is barking at the mailman
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the dog is barking at the mailman then the arson occurred on elm street, and the dog is barking at the mailman, which establishes that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the dog is barking at the mailman then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The dog is barking at the mailman
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, since if the dog is barking at the mailman then the arson occurred on elm street and the dog is barking at the mailman.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the dog is barking at the mailman then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The dog is barking at the mailman
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, because if the dog is barking at the mailman then the arson occurred on elm street and the dog is barking at the mailman.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the dog is barking at the mailman then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The dog is barking at the mailman
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, as if the dog is barking at the mailman then the arson occurred on elm street and the dog is barking at the mailman.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the dog is barking at the mailman then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The dog is barking at the mailman
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the dog is barking at the mailman then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, therefore the dog is not barking at the mailman.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the dog is barking at the mailman then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The dog is not barking at the mailman
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the dog is barking at the mailman then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, hence the dog is not barking at the mailman.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the dog is barking at the mailman then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The dog is not barking at the mailman
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the dog is barking at the mailman then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, thus the dog is not barking at the mailman.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the dog is barking at the mailman then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The dog is not barking at the mailman
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the dog is barking at the mailman then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so it can be concluded that the dog is not barking at the mailman.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the dog is barking at the mailman then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The dog is not barking at the mailman
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the dog is barking at the mailman then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so the dog is not barking at the mailman.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the dog is barking at the mailman then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The dog is not barking at the mailman
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the dog is barking at the mailman then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which implies that the dog is not barking at the mailman.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the dog is barking at the mailman then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The dog is not barking at the mailman
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the dog is barking at the mailman then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which shows that the dog is not barking at the mailman.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the dog is barking at the mailman then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The dog is not barking at the mailman
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the dog is barking at the mailman then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which establishes that the dog is not barking at the mailman.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the dog is barking at the mailman then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The dog is not barking at the mailman
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The dog is not barking at the mailman, since if the dog is barking at the mailman then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the dog is barking at the mailman then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The dog is not barking at the mailman
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The dog is not barking at the mailman, because if the dog is barking at the mailman then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the dog is barking at the mailman then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The dog is not barking at the mailman
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The dog is not barking at the mailman, as if the dog is barking at the mailman then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the dog is barking at the mailman then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The dog is not barking at the mailman
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the book is on the nightstand then the arson occurred on elm street, and the book is on the nightstand, therefore the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the book is on the nightstand then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The book is on the nightstand
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the book is on the nightstand then the arson occurred on elm street, and the book is on the nightstand, hence the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the book is on the nightstand then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The book is on the nightstand
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the book is on the nightstand then the arson occurred on elm street, and the book is on the nightstand, thus the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the book is on the nightstand then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The book is on the nightstand
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the book is on the nightstand then the arson occurred on elm street, and the book is on the nightstand, so it can be concluded that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the book is on the nightstand then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The book is on the nightstand
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the book is on the nightstand then the arson occurred on elm street, and the book is on the nightstand, so the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the book is on the nightstand then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The book is on the nightstand
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the book is on the nightstand then the arson occurred on elm street, and the book is on the nightstand, which implies that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the book is on the nightstand then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The book is on the nightstand
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the book is on the nightstand then the arson occurred on elm street, and the book is on the nightstand, which shows that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the book is on the nightstand then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The book is on the nightstand
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the book is on the nightstand then the arson occurred on elm street, and the book is on the nightstand, which establishes that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the book is on the nightstand then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The book is on the nightstand
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, since if the book is on the nightstand then the arson occurred on elm street and the book is on the nightstand.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the book is on the nightstand then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The book is on the nightstand
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, because if the book is on the nightstand then the arson occurred on elm street and the book is on the nightstand.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the book is on the nightstand then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The book is on the nightstand
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, as if the book is on the nightstand then the arson occurred on elm street and the book is on the nightstand.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the book is on the nightstand then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The book is on the nightstand
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the book is on the nightstand then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, therefore the book is not on the nightstand.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the book is on the nightstand then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The book is not on the nightstand
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the book is on the nightstand then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, hence the book is not on the nightstand.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the book is on the nightstand then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The book is not on the nightstand
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the book is on the nightstand then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, thus the book is not on the nightstand.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the book is on the nightstand then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The book is not on the nightstand
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the book is on the nightstand then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so it can be concluded that the book is not on the nightstand.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the book is on the nightstand then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The book is not on the nightstand
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the book is on the nightstand then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so the book is not on the nightstand.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the book is on the nightstand then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The book is not on the nightstand
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the book is on the nightstand then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which implies that the book is not on the nightstand.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the book is on the nightstand then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The book is not on the nightstand
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the book is on the nightstand then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which shows that the book is not on the nightstand.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the book is on the nightstand then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The book is not on the nightstand
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the book is on the nightstand then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which establishes that the book is not on the nightstand.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the book is on the nightstand then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The book is not on the nightstand
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The book is not on the nightstand, since if the book is on the nightstand then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the book is on the nightstand then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The book is not on the nightstand
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The book is not on the nightstand, because if the book is on the nightstand then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the book is on the nightstand then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The book is not on the nightstand
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The book is not on the nightstand, as if the book is on the nightstand then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the book is on the nightstand then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The book is not on the nightstand
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the movie is a thriller then the arson occurred on elm street, and the movie is a thriller, therefore the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the movie is a thriller then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The movie is a thriller
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the movie is a thriller then the arson occurred on elm street, and the movie is a thriller, hence the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the movie is a thriller then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The movie is a thriller
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the movie is a thriller then the arson occurred on elm street, and the movie is a thriller, thus the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the movie is a thriller then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The movie is a thriller
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the movie is a thriller then the arson occurred on elm street, and the movie is a thriller, so it can be concluded that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the movie is a thriller then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The movie is a thriller
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the movie is a thriller then the arson occurred on elm street, and the movie is a thriller, so the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the movie is a thriller then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The movie is a thriller
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the movie is a thriller then the arson occurred on elm street, and the movie is a thriller, which implies that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the movie is a thriller then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The movie is a thriller
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the movie is a thriller then the arson occurred on elm street, and the movie is a thriller, which shows that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the movie is a thriller then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The movie is a thriller
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the movie is a thriller then the arson occurred on elm street, and the movie is a thriller, which establishes that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the movie is a thriller then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The movie is a thriller
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, since if the movie is a thriller then the arson occurred on elm street and the movie is a thriller.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the movie is a thriller then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The movie is a thriller
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, because if the movie is a thriller then the arson occurred on elm street and the movie is a thriller.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the movie is a thriller then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The movie is a thriller
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, as if the movie is a thriller then the arson occurred on elm street and the movie is a thriller.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the movie is a thriller then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The movie is a thriller
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the movie is a thriller then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, therefore the movie is not a thriller.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the movie is a thriller then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The movie is not a thriller
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the movie is a thriller then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, hence the movie is not a thriller.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the movie is a thriller then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The movie is not a thriller
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the movie is a thriller then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, thus the movie is not a thriller.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the movie is a thriller then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The movie is not a thriller
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the movie is a thriller then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so it can be concluded that the movie is not a thriller.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the movie is a thriller then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The movie is not a thriller
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the movie is a thriller then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so the movie is not a thriller.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the movie is a thriller then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The movie is not a thriller
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the movie is a thriller then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which implies that the movie is not a thriller.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the movie is a thriller then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The movie is not a thriller
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the movie is a thriller then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which shows that the movie is not a thriller.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the movie is a thriller then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The movie is not a thriller
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the movie is a thriller then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which establishes that the movie is not a thriller.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the movie is a thriller then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The movie is not a thriller
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The movie is not a thriller, since if the movie is a thriller then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the movie is a thriller then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The movie is not a thriller
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The movie is not a thriller, because if the movie is a thriller then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the movie is a thriller then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The movie is not a thriller
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The movie is not a thriller, as if the movie is a thriller then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the movie is a thriller then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The movie is not a thriller
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the weather is cold and snowy then the arson occurred on elm street, and the weather is cold and snowy, therefore the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the weather is cold and snowy then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The weather is cold and snowy
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the weather is cold and snowy then the arson occurred on elm street, and the weather is cold and snowy, hence the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the weather is cold and snowy then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The weather is cold and snowy
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the weather is cold and snowy then the arson occurred on elm street, and the weather is cold and snowy, thus the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the weather is cold and snowy then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The weather is cold and snowy
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the weather is cold and snowy then the arson occurred on elm street, and the weather is cold and snowy, so it can be concluded that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the weather is cold and snowy then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The weather is cold and snowy
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the weather is cold and snowy then the arson occurred on elm street, and the weather is cold and snowy, so the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the weather is cold and snowy then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The weather is cold and snowy
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the weather is cold and snowy then the arson occurred on elm street, and the weather is cold and snowy, which implies that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the weather is cold and snowy then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The weather is cold and snowy
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the weather is cold and snowy then the arson occurred on elm street, and the weather is cold and snowy, which shows that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the weather is cold and snowy then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The weather is cold and snowy
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the weather is cold and snowy then the arson occurred on elm street, and the weather is cold and snowy, which establishes that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the weather is cold and snowy then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The weather is cold and snowy
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, since if the weather is cold and snowy then the arson occurred on elm street and the weather is cold and snowy.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the weather is cold and snowy then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The weather is cold and snowy
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, because if the weather is cold and snowy then the arson occurred on elm street and the weather is cold and snowy.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the weather is cold and snowy then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The weather is cold and snowy
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, as if the weather is cold and snowy then the arson occurred on elm street and the weather is cold and snowy.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the weather is cold and snowy then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The weather is cold and snowy
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the weather is cold and snowy then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, therefore the weather is not cold and snowy.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the weather is cold and snowy then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The weather is not cold and snowy
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the weather is cold and snowy then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, hence the weather is not cold and snowy.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the weather is cold and snowy then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The weather is not cold and snowy
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the weather is cold and snowy then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, thus the weather is not cold and snowy.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the weather is cold and snowy then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The weather is not cold and snowy
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the weather is cold and snowy then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so it can be concluded that the weather is not cold and snowy.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the weather is cold and snowy then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The weather is not cold and snowy
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.