<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street, and officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene, therefore the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
stringlengths 355
1.02k
|
|---|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the weather is cold and snowy then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so the weather is not cold and snowy.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the weather is cold and snowy then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The weather is not cold and snowy
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the weather is cold and snowy then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which implies that the weather is not cold and snowy.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the weather is cold and snowy then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The weather is not cold and snowy
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the weather is cold and snowy then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which shows that the weather is not cold and snowy.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the weather is cold and snowy then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The weather is not cold and snowy
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the weather is cold and snowy then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which establishes that the weather is not cold and snowy.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the weather is cold and snowy then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The weather is not cold and snowy
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The weather is not cold and snowy, since if the weather is cold and snowy then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the weather is cold and snowy then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The weather is not cold and snowy
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The weather is not cold and snowy, because if the weather is cold and snowy then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the weather is cold and snowy then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The weather is not cold and snowy
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The weather is not cold and snowy, as if the weather is cold and snowy then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the weather is cold and snowy then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The weather is not cold and snowy
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the baby is teething on a toy then the arson occurred on elm street, and the baby is teething on a toy, therefore the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is teething on a toy then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The baby is teething on a toy
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the baby is teething on a toy then the arson occurred on elm street, and the baby is teething on a toy, hence the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is teething on a toy then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The baby is teething on a toy
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the baby is teething on a toy then the arson occurred on elm street, and the baby is teething on a toy, thus the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is teething on a toy then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The baby is teething on a toy
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the baby is teething on a toy then the arson occurred on elm street, and the baby is teething on a toy, so it can be concluded that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is teething on a toy then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The baby is teething on a toy
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the baby is teething on a toy then the arson occurred on elm street, and the baby is teething on a toy, so the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is teething on a toy then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The baby is teething on a toy
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the baby is teething on a toy then the arson occurred on elm street, and the baby is teething on a toy, which implies that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is teething on a toy then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The baby is teething on a toy
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the baby is teething on a toy then the arson occurred on elm street, and the baby is teething on a toy, which shows that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is teething on a toy then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The baby is teething on a toy
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the baby is teething on a toy then the arson occurred on elm street, and the baby is teething on a toy, which establishes that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is teething on a toy then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The baby is teething on a toy
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, since if the baby is teething on a toy then the arson occurred on elm street and the baby is teething on a toy.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is teething on a toy then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The baby is teething on a toy
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, because if the baby is teething on a toy then the arson occurred on elm street and the baby is teething on a toy.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is teething on a toy then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The baby is teething on a toy
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, as if the baby is teething on a toy then the arson occurred on elm street and the baby is teething on a toy.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is teething on a toy then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The baby is teething on a toy
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the baby is teething on a toy then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, therefore the baby is not teething on a toy.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is teething on a toy then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The baby is not teething on a toy
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the baby is teething on a toy then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, hence the baby is not teething on a toy.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is teething on a toy then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The baby is not teething on a toy
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the baby is teething on a toy then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, thus the baby is not teething on a toy.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is teething on a toy then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The baby is not teething on a toy
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the baby is teething on a toy then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so it can be concluded that the baby is not teething on a toy.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is teething on a toy then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The baby is not teething on a toy
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the baby is teething on a toy then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so the baby is not teething on a toy.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is teething on a toy then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The baby is not teething on a toy
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the baby is teething on a toy then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which implies that the baby is not teething on a toy.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is teething on a toy then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The baby is not teething on a toy
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the baby is teething on a toy then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which shows that the baby is not teething on a toy.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is teething on a toy then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The baby is not teething on a toy
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the baby is teething on a toy then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which establishes that the baby is not teething on a toy.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is teething on a toy then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The baby is not teething on a toy
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The baby is not teething on a toy, since if the baby is teething on a toy then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is teething on a toy then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The baby is not teething on a toy
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The baby is not teething on a toy, because if the baby is teething on a toy then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is teething on a toy then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The baby is not teething on a toy
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The baby is not teething on a toy, as if the baby is teething on a toy then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is teething on a toy then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The baby is not teething on a toy
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the cat is sleeping in the sun then the arson occurred on elm street, and the cat is sleeping in the sun, therefore the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the cat is sleeping in the sun then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The cat is sleeping in the sun
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the cat is sleeping in the sun then the arson occurred on elm street, and the cat is sleeping in the sun, hence the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the cat is sleeping in the sun then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The cat is sleeping in the sun
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the cat is sleeping in the sun then the arson occurred on elm street, and the cat is sleeping in the sun, thus the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the cat is sleeping in the sun then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The cat is sleeping in the sun
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the cat is sleeping in the sun then the arson occurred on elm street, and the cat is sleeping in the sun, so it can be concluded that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the cat is sleeping in the sun then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The cat is sleeping in the sun
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the cat is sleeping in the sun then the arson occurred on elm street, and the cat is sleeping in the sun, so the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the cat is sleeping in the sun then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The cat is sleeping in the sun
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the cat is sleeping in the sun then the arson occurred on elm street, and the cat is sleeping in the sun, which implies that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the cat is sleeping in the sun then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The cat is sleeping in the sun
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the cat is sleeping in the sun then the arson occurred on elm street, and the cat is sleeping in the sun, which shows that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the cat is sleeping in the sun then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The cat is sleeping in the sun
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the cat is sleeping in the sun then the arson occurred on elm street, and the cat is sleeping in the sun, which establishes that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the cat is sleeping in the sun then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The cat is sleeping in the sun
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, since if the cat is sleeping in the sun then the arson occurred on elm street and the cat is sleeping in the sun.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the cat is sleeping in the sun then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The cat is sleeping in the sun
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, because if the cat is sleeping in the sun then the arson occurred on elm street and the cat is sleeping in the sun.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the cat is sleeping in the sun then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The cat is sleeping in the sun
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, as if the cat is sleeping in the sun then the arson occurred on elm street and the cat is sleeping in the sun.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the cat is sleeping in the sun then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The cat is sleeping in the sun
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the cat is sleeping in the sun then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, therefore the cat is not sleeping in the sun.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the cat is sleeping in the sun then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The cat is not sleeping in the sun
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the cat is sleeping in the sun then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, hence the cat is not sleeping in the sun.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the cat is sleeping in the sun then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The cat is not sleeping in the sun
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the cat is sleeping in the sun then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, thus the cat is not sleeping in the sun.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the cat is sleeping in the sun then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The cat is not sleeping in the sun
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the cat is sleeping in the sun then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so it can be concluded that the cat is not sleeping in the sun.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the cat is sleeping in the sun then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The cat is not sleeping in the sun
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the cat is sleeping in the sun then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so the cat is not sleeping in the sun.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the cat is sleeping in the sun then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The cat is not sleeping in the sun
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the cat is sleeping in the sun then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which implies that the cat is not sleeping in the sun.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the cat is sleeping in the sun then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The cat is not sleeping in the sun
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the cat is sleeping in the sun then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which shows that the cat is not sleeping in the sun.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the cat is sleeping in the sun then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The cat is not sleeping in the sun
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the cat is sleeping in the sun then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which establishes that the cat is not sleeping in the sun.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the cat is sleeping in the sun then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The cat is not sleeping in the sun
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is not sleeping in the sun, since if the cat is sleeping in the sun then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the cat is sleeping in the sun then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The cat is not sleeping in the sun
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is not sleeping in the sun, because if the cat is sleeping in the sun then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the cat is sleeping in the sun then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The cat is not sleeping in the sun
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is not sleeping in the sun, as if the cat is sleeping in the sun then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the cat is sleeping in the sun then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The cat is not sleeping in the sun
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the dog is barking at the dog next door then the arson occurred on elm street, and the dog is barking at the dog next door, therefore the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the dog is barking at the dog next door then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The dog is barking at the dog next door
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the dog is barking at the dog next door then the arson occurred on elm street, and the dog is barking at the dog next door, hence the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the dog is barking at the dog next door then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The dog is barking at the dog next door
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the dog is barking at the dog next door then the arson occurred on elm street, and the dog is barking at the dog next door, thus the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the dog is barking at the dog next door then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The dog is barking at the dog next door
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the dog is barking at the dog next door then the arson occurred on elm street, and the dog is barking at the dog next door, so it can be concluded that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the dog is barking at the dog next door then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The dog is barking at the dog next door
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the dog is barking at the dog next door then the arson occurred on elm street, and the dog is barking at the dog next door, so the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the dog is barking at the dog next door then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The dog is barking at the dog next door
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the dog is barking at the dog next door then the arson occurred on elm street, and the dog is barking at the dog next door, which implies that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the dog is barking at the dog next door then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The dog is barking at the dog next door
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the dog is barking at the dog next door then the arson occurred on elm street, and the dog is barking at the dog next door, which shows that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the dog is barking at the dog next door then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The dog is barking at the dog next door
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the dog is barking at the dog next door then the arson occurred on elm street, and the dog is barking at the dog next door, which establishes that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the dog is barking at the dog next door then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The dog is barking at the dog next door
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, since if the dog is barking at the dog next door then the arson occurred on elm street and the dog is barking at the dog next door.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the dog is barking at the dog next door then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The dog is barking at the dog next door
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, because if the dog is barking at the dog next door then the arson occurred on elm street and the dog is barking at the dog next door.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the dog is barking at the dog next door then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The dog is barking at the dog next door
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, as if the dog is barking at the dog next door then the arson occurred on elm street and the dog is barking at the dog next door.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the dog is barking at the dog next door then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The dog is barking at the dog next door
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the dog is barking at the dog next door then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, therefore the dog is not barking at the dog next door.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the dog is barking at the dog next door then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The dog is not barking at the dog next door
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the dog is barking at the dog next door then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, hence the dog is not barking at the dog next door.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the dog is barking at the dog next door then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The dog is not barking at the dog next door
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the dog is barking at the dog next door then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, thus the dog is not barking at the dog next door.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the dog is barking at the dog next door then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The dog is not barking at the dog next door
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the dog is barking at the dog next door then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so it can be concluded that the dog is not barking at the dog next door.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the dog is barking at the dog next door then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The dog is not barking at the dog next door
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the dog is barking at the dog next door then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so the dog is not barking at the dog next door.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the dog is barking at the dog next door then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The dog is not barking at the dog next door
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the dog is barking at the dog next door then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which implies that the dog is not barking at the dog next door.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the dog is barking at the dog next door then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The dog is not barking at the dog next door
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the dog is barking at the dog next door then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which shows that the dog is not barking at the dog next door.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the dog is barking at the dog next door then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The dog is not barking at the dog next door
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the dog is barking at the dog next door then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which establishes that the dog is not barking at the dog next door.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the dog is barking at the dog next door then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The dog is not barking at the dog next door
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The dog is not barking at the dog next door, since if the dog is barking at the dog next door then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the dog is barking at the dog next door then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The dog is not barking at the dog next door
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The dog is not barking at the dog next door, because if the dog is barking at the dog next door then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the dog is barking at the dog next door then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The dog is not barking at the dog next door
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The dog is not barking at the dog next door, as if the dog is barking at the dog next door then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the dog is barking at the dog next door then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The dog is not barking at the dog next door
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the book is a mystery novel then the arson occurred on elm street, and the book is a mystery novel, therefore the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the book is a mystery novel then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The book is a mystery novel
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the book is a mystery novel then the arson occurred on elm street, and the book is a mystery novel, hence the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the book is a mystery novel then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The book is a mystery novel
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the book is a mystery novel then the arson occurred on elm street, and the book is a mystery novel, thus the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the book is a mystery novel then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The book is a mystery novel
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the book is a mystery novel then the arson occurred on elm street, and the book is a mystery novel, so it can be concluded that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the book is a mystery novel then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The book is a mystery novel
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the book is a mystery novel then the arson occurred on elm street, and the book is a mystery novel, so the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the book is a mystery novel then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The book is a mystery novel
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the book is a mystery novel then the arson occurred on elm street, and the book is a mystery novel, which implies that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the book is a mystery novel then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The book is a mystery novel
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the book is a mystery novel then the arson occurred on elm street, and the book is a mystery novel, which shows that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the book is a mystery novel then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The book is a mystery novel
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the book is a mystery novel then the arson occurred on elm street, and the book is a mystery novel, which establishes that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the book is a mystery novel then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The book is a mystery novel
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, since if the book is a mystery novel then the arson occurred on elm street and the book is a mystery novel.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the book is a mystery novel then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The book is a mystery novel
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, because if the book is a mystery novel then the arson occurred on elm street and the book is a mystery novel.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the book is a mystery novel then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The book is a mystery novel
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, as if the book is a mystery novel then the arson occurred on elm street and the book is a mystery novel.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the book is a mystery novel then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The book is a mystery novel
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the book is a mystery novel then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, therefore the book is not a mystery novel.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the book is a mystery novel then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The book is not a mystery novel
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the book is a mystery novel then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, hence the book is not a mystery novel.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the book is a mystery novel then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The book is not a mystery novel
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the book is a mystery novel then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, thus the book is not a mystery novel.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the book is a mystery novel then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The book is not a mystery novel
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the book is a mystery novel then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so it can be concluded that the book is not a mystery novel.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the book is a mystery novel then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The book is not a mystery novel
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the book is a mystery novel then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so the book is not a mystery novel.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the book is a mystery novel then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The book is not a mystery novel
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the book is a mystery novel then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which implies that the book is not a mystery novel.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the book is a mystery novel then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The book is not a mystery novel
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the book is a mystery novel then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which shows that the book is not a mystery novel.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the book is a mystery novel then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The book is not a mystery novel
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the book is a mystery novel then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which establishes that the book is not a mystery novel.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the book is a mystery novel then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The book is not a mystery novel
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The book is not a mystery novel, since if the book is a mystery novel then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the book is a mystery novel then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The book is not a mystery novel
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The book is not a mystery novel, because if the book is a mystery novel then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the book is a mystery novel then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The book is not a mystery novel
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The book is not a mystery novel, as if the book is a mystery novel then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the book is a mystery novel then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The book is not a mystery novel
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the movie is a comedy-drama then the arson occurred on elm street, and the movie is a comedy-drama, therefore the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the movie is a comedy-drama then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The movie is a comedy-drama
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the movie is a comedy-drama then the arson occurred on elm street, and the movie is a comedy-drama, hence the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the movie is a comedy-drama then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The movie is a comedy-drama
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the movie is a comedy-drama then the arson occurred on elm street, and the movie is a comedy-drama, thus the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the movie is a comedy-drama then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The movie is a comedy-drama
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the movie is a comedy-drama then the arson occurred on elm street, and the movie is a comedy-drama, so it can be concluded that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the movie is a comedy-drama then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The movie is a comedy-drama
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the movie is a comedy-drama then the arson occurred on elm street, and the movie is a comedy-drama, so the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the movie is a comedy-drama then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The movie is a comedy-drama
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.