<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street, and officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene, therefore the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
stringlengths 355
1.02k
|
|---|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the dog is barking at the squirrel then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, thus the dog is not barking at the squirrel.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the dog is barking at the squirrel then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The dog is not barking at the squirrel
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the dog is barking at the squirrel then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so it can be concluded that the dog is not barking at the squirrel.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the dog is barking at the squirrel then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The dog is not barking at the squirrel
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the dog is barking at the squirrel then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so the dog is not barking at the squirrel.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the dog is barking at the squirrel then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The dog is not barking at the squirrel
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the dog is barking at the squirrel then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which implies that the dog is not barking at the squirrel.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the dog is barking at the squirrel then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The dog is not barking at the squirrel
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the dog is barking at the squirrel then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which shows that the dog is not barking at the squirrel.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the dog is barking at the squirrel then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The dog is not barking at the squirrel
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the dog is barking at the squirrel then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which establishes that the dog is not barking at the squirrel.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the dog is barking at the squirrel then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The dog is not barking at the squirrel
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The dog is not barking at the squirrel, since if the dog is barking at the squirrel then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the dog is barking at the squirrel then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The dog is not barking at the squirrel
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The dog is not barking at the squirrel, because if the dog is barking at the squirrel then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the dog is barking at the squirrel then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The dog is not barking at the squirrel
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The dog is not barking at the squirrel, as if the dog is barking at the squirrel then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the dog is barking at the squirrel then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The dog is not barking at the squirrel
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the book is a romance novel then the arson occurred on elm street, and the book is a romance novel, therefore the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the book is a romance novel then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The book is a romance novel
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the book is a romance novel then the arson occurred on elm street, and the book is a romance novel, hence the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the book is a romance novel then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The book is a romance novel
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the book is a romance novel then the arson occurred on elm street, and the book is a romance novel, thus the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the book is a romance novel then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The book is a romance novel
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the book is a romance novel then the arson occurred on elm street, and the book is a romance novel, so it can be concluded that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the book is a romance novel then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The book is a romance novel
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the book is a romance novel then the arson occurred on elm street, and the book is a romance novel, so the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the book is a romance novel then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The book is a romance novel
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the book is a romance novel then the arson occurred on elm street, and the book is a romance novel, which implies that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the book is a romance novel then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The book is a romance novel
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the book is a romance novel then the arson occurred on elm street, and the book is a romance novel, which shows that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the book is a romance novel then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The book is a romance novel
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the book is a romance novel then the arson occurred on elm street, and the book is a romance novel, which establishes that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the book is a romance novel then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The book is a romance novel
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, since if the book is a romance novel then the arson occurred on elm street and the book is a romance novel.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the book is a romance novel then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The book is a romance novel
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, because if the book is a romance novel then the arson occurred on elm street and the book is a romance novel.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the book is a romance novel then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The book is a romance novel
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, as if the book is a romance novel then the arson occurred on elm street and the book is a romance novel.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the book is a romance novel then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The book is a romance novel
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the book is a romance novel then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, therefore the book is not a romance novel.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the book is a romance novel then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The book is not a romance novel
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the book is a romance novel then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, hence the book is not a romance novel.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the book is a romance novel then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The book is not a romance novel
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the book is a romance novel then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, thus the book is not a romance novel.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the book is a romance novel then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The book is not a romance novel
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the book is a romance novel then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so it can be concluded that the book is not a romance novel.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the book is a romance novel then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The book is not a romance novel
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the book is a romance novel then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so the book is not a romance novel.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the book is a romance novel then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The book is not a romance novel
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the book is a romance novel then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which implies that the book is not a romance novel.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the book is a romance novel then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The book is not a romance novel
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the book is a romance novel then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which shows that the book is not a romance novel.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the book is a romance novel then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The book is not a romance novel
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the book is a romance novel then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which establishes that the book is not a romance novel.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the book is a romance novel then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The book is not a romance novel
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The book is not a romance novel, since if the book is a romance novel then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the book is a romance novel then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The book is not a romance novel
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The book is not a romance novel, because if the book is a romance novel then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the book is a romance novel then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The book is not a romance novel
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The book is not a romance novel, as if the book is a romance novel then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the book is a romance novel then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The book is not a romance novel
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the movie is a science fiction film then the arson occurred on elm street, and the movie is a science fiction film, therefore the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the movie is a science fiction film then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The movie is a science fiction film
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the movie is a science fiction film then the arson occurred on elm street, and the movie is a science fiction film, hence the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the movie is a science fiction film then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The movie is a science fiction film
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the movie is a science fiction film then the arson occurred on elm street, and the movie is a science fiction film, thus the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the movie is a science fiction film then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The movie is a science fiction film
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the movie is a science fiction film then the arson occurred on elm street, and the movie is a science fiction film, so it can be concluded that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the movie is a science fiction film then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The movie is a science fiction film
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the movie is a science fiction film then the arson occurred on elm street, and the movie is a science fiction film, so the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the movie is a science fiction film then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The movie is a science fiction film
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the movie is a science fiction film then the arson occurred on elm street, and the movie is a science fiction film, which implies that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the movie is a science fiction film then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The movie is a science fiction film
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the movie is a science fiction film then the arson occurred on elm street, and the movie is a science fiction film, which shows that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the movie is a science fiction film then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The movie is a science fiction film
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the movie is a science fiction film then the arson occurred on elm street, and the movie is a science fiction film, which establishes that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the movie is a science fiction film then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The movie is a science fiction film
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, since if the movie is a science fiction film then the arson occurred on elm street and the movie is a science fiction film.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the movie is a science fiction film then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The movie is a science fiction film
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, because if the movie is a science fiction film then the arson occurred on elm street and the movie is a science fiction film.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the movie is a science fiction film then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The movie is a science fiction film
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, as if the movie is a science fiction film then the arson occurred on elm street and the movie is a science fiction film.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the movie is a science fiction film then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The movie is a science fiction film
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the movie is a science fiction film then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, therefore the movie is not a science fiction film.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the movie is a science fiction film then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The movie is not a science fiction film
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the movie is a science fiction film then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, hence the movie is not a science fiction film.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the movie is a science fiction film then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The movie is not a science fiction film
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the movie is a science fiction film then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, thus the movie is not a science fiction film.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the movie is a science fiction film then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The movie is not a science fiction film
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the movie is a science fiction film then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so it can be concluded that the movie is not a science fiction film.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the movie is a science fiction film then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The movie is not a science fiction film
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the movie is a science fiction film then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so the movie is not a science fiction film.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the movie is a science fiction film then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The movie is not a science fiction film
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the movie is a science fiction film then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which implies that the movie is not a science fiction film.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the movie is a science fiction film then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The movie is not a science fiction film
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the movie is a science fiction film then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which shows that the movie is not a science fiction film.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the movie is a science fiction film then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The movie is not a science fiction film
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the movie is a science fiction film then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which establishes that the movie is not a science fiction film.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the movie is a science fiction film then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The movie is not a science fiction film
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The movie is not a science fiction film, since if the movie is a science fiction film then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the movie is a science fiction film then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The movie is not a science fiction film
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The movie is not a science fiction film, because if the movie is a science fiction film then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the movie is a science fiction film then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The movie is not a science fiction film
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The movie is not a science fiction film, as if the movie is a science fiction film then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the movie is a science fiction film then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The movie is not a science fiction film
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the sun is setting slowly in the sky then the arson occurred on elm street, and the sun is setting slowly in the sky, therefore the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the sun is setting slowly in the sky then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The sun is setting slowly in the sky
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the sun is setting slowly in the sky then the arson occurred on elm street, and the sun is setting slowly in the sky, hence the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the sun is setting slowly in the sky then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The sun is setting slowly in the sky
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the sun is setting slowly in the sky then the arson occurred on elm street, and the sun is setting slowly in the sky, thus the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the sun is setting slowly in the sky then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The sun is setting slowly in the sky
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the sun is setting slowly in the sky then the arson occurred on elm street, and the sun is setting slowly in the sky, so it can be concluded that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the sun is setting slowly in the sky then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The sun is setting slowly in the sky
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the sun is setting slowly in the sky then the arson occurred on elm street, and the sun is setting slowly in the sky, so the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the sun is setting slowly in the sky then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The sun is setting slowly in the sky
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the sun is setting slowly in the sky then the arson occurred on elm street, and the sun is setting slowly in the sky, which implies that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the sun is setting slowly in the sky then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The sun is setting slowly in the sky
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the sun is setting slowly in the sky then the arson occurred on elm street, and the sun is setting slowly in the sky, which shows that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the sun is setting slowly in the sky then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The sun is setting slowly in the sky
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the sun is setting slowly in the sky then the arson occurred on elm street, and the sun is setting slowly in the sky, which establishes that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the sun is setting slowly in the sky then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The sun is setting slowly in the sky
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, since if the sun is setting slowly in the sky then the arson occurred on elm street and the sun is setting slowly in the sky.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the sun is setting slowly in the sky then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The sun is setting slowly in the sky
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, because if the sun is setting slowly in the sky then the arson occurred on elm street and the sun is setting slowly in the sky.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the sun is setting slowly in the sky then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The sun is setting slowly in the sky
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, as if the sun is setting slowly in the sky then the arson occurred on elm street and the sun is setting slowly in the sky.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the sun is setting slowly in the sky then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The sun is setting slowly in the sky
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the sun is setting slowly in the sky then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, therefore the sun is not setting slowly in the sky.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the sun is setting slowly in the sky then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The sun is not setting slowly in the sky
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the sun is setting slowly in the sky then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, hence the sun is not setting slowly in the sky.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the sun is setting slowly in the sky then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The sun is not setting slowly in the sky
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the sun is setting slowly in the sky then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, thus the sun is not setting slowly in the sky.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the sun is setting slowly in the sky then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The sun is not setting slowly in the sky
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the sun is setting slowly in the sky then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so it can be concluded that the sun is not setting slowly in the sky.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the sun is setting slowly in the sky then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The sun is not setting slowly in the sky
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the sun is setting slowly in the sky then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so the sun is not setting slowly in the sky.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the sun is setting slowly in the sky then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The sun is not setting slowly in the sky
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the sun is setting slowly in the sky then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which implies that the sun is not setting slowly in the sky.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the sun is setting slowly in the sky then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The sun is not setting slowly in the sky
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the sun is setting slowly in the sky then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which shows that the sun is not setting slowly in the sky.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the sun is setting slowly in the sky then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The sun is not setting slowly in the sky
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the sun is setting slowly in the sky then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which establishes that the sun is not setting slowly in the sky.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the sun is setting slowly in the sky then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The sun is not setting slowly in the sky
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The sun is not setting slowly in the sky, since if the sun is setting slowly in the sky then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the sun is setting slowly in the sky then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The sun is not setting slowly in the sky
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The sun is not setting slowly in the sky, because if the sun is setting slowly in the sky then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the sun is setting slowly in the sky then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The sun is not setting slowly in the sky
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The sun is not setting slowly in the sky, as if the sun is setting slowly in the sky then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the sun is setting slowly in the sky then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The sun is not setting slowly in the sky
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the cat is grooming itself then the arson occurred on elm street, and the cat is grooming itself, therefore the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the cat is grooming itself then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The cat is grooming itself
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the cat is grooming itself then the arson occurred on elm street, and the cat is grooming itself, hence the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the cat is grooming itself then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The cat is grooming itself
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the cat is grooming itself then the arson occurred on elm street, and the cat is grooming itself, thus the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the cat is grooming itself then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The cat is grooming itself
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the cat is grooming itself then the arson occurred on elm street, and the cat is grooming itself, so it can be concluded that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the cat is grooming itself then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The cat is grooming itself
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the cat is grooming itself then the arson occurred on elm street, and the cat is grooming itself, so the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the cat is grooming itself then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The cat is grooming itself
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the cat is grooming itself then the arson occurred on elm street, and the cat is grooming itself, which implies that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the cat is grooming itself then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The cat is grooming itself
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the cat is grooming itself then the arson occurred on elm street, and the cat is grooming itself, which shows that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the cat is grooming itself then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The cat is grooming itself
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the cat is grooming itself then the arson occurred on elm street, and the cat is grooming itself, which establishes that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the cat is grooming itself then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The cat is grooming itself
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, since if the cat is grooming itself then the arson occurred on elm street and the cat is grooming itself.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the cat is grooming itself then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The cat is grooming itself
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, because if the cat is grooming itself then the arson occurred on elm street and the cat is grooming itself.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the cat is grooming itself then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The cat is grooming itself
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, as if the cat is grooming itself then the arson occurred on elm street and the cat is grooming itself.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the cat is grooming itself then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The cat is grooming itself
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the cat is grooming itself then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, therefore the cat is not grooming itself.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the cat is grooming itself then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The cat is not grooming itself
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the cat is grooming itself then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, hence the cat is not grooming itself.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the cat is grooming itself then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The cat is not grooming itself
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the cat is grooming itself then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, thus the cat is not grooming itself.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the cat is grooming itself then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The cat is not grooming itself
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the cat is grooming itself then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so it can be concluded that the cat is not grooming itself.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the cat is grooming itself then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The cat is not grooming itself
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the cat is grooming itself then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so the cat is not grooming itself.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the cat is grooming itself then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The cat is not grooming itself
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the cat is grooming itself then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which implies that the cat is not grooming itself.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the cat is grooming itself then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The cat is not grooming itself
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the cat is grooming itself then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which shows that the cat is not grooming itself.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the cat is grooming itself then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The cat is not grooming itself
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the cat is grooming itself then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which establishes that the cat is not grooming itself.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the cat is grooming itself then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The cat is not grooming itself
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is not grooming itself, since if the cat is grooming itself then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the cat is grooming itself then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The cat is not grooming itself
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is not grooming itself, because if the cat is grooming itself then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the cat is grooming itself then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The cat is not grooming itself
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is not grooming itself, as if the cat is grooming itself then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the cat is grooming itself then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The cat is not grooming itself
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the baby is playing with blocks then the arson occurred on elm street, and the baby is playing with blocks, therefore the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is playing with blocks then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The baby is playing with blocks
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the baby is playing with blocks then the arson occurred on elm street, and the baby is playing with blocks, hence the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is playing with blocks then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The baby is playing with blocks
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the baby is playing with blocks then the arson occurred on elm street, and the baby is playing with blocks, thus the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is playing with blocks then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The baby is playing with blocks
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.