<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street, and officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene, therefore the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
stringlengths 355
1.02k
|
|---|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the dog is barking at the neighbors then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, therefore the dog is not barking at the neighbors.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the dog is barking at the neighbors then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The dog is not barking at the neighbors
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the dog is barking at the neighbors then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, hence the dog is not barking at the neighbors.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the dog is barking at the neighbors then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The dog is not barking at the neighbors
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the dog is barking at the neighbors then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, thus the dog is not barking at the neighbors.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the dog is barking at the neighbors then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The dog is not barking at the neighbors
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the dog is barking at the neighbors then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so it can be concluded that the dog is not barking at the neighbors.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the dog is barking at the neighbors then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The dog is not barking at the neighbors
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the dog is barking at the neighbors then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so the dog is not barking at the neighbors.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the dog is barking at the neighbors then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The dog is not barking at the neighbors
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the dog is barking at the neighbors then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which implies that the dog is not barking at the neighbors.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the dog is barking at the neighbors then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The dog is not barking at the neighbors
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the dog is barking at the neighbors then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which shows that the dog is not barking at the neighbors.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the dog is barking at the neighbors then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The dog is not barking at the neighbors
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the dog is barking at the neighbors then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which establishes that the dog is not barking at the neighbors.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the dog is barking at the neighbors then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The dog is not barking at the neighbors
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The dog is not barking at the neighbors, since if the dog is barking at the neighbors then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the dog is barking at the neighbors then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The dog is not barking at the neighbors
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The dog is not barking at the neighbors, because if the dog is barking at the neighbors then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the dog is barking at the neighbors then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The dog is not barking at the neighbors
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The dog is not barking at the neighbors, as if the dog is barking at the neighbors then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the dog is barking at the neighbors then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The dog is not barking at the neighbors
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the sun is shining brightly in the sky then the arson occurred on elm street, and the sun is shining brightly in the sky, therefore the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the sun is shining brightly in the sky then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The sun is shining brightly in the sky
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the sun is shining brightly in the sky then the arson occurred on elm street, and the sun is shining brightly in the sky, hence the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the sun is shining brightly in the sky then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The sun is shining brightly in the sky
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the sun is shining brightly in the sky then the arson occurred on elm street, and the sun is shining brightly in the sky, thus the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the sun is shining brightly in the sky then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The sun is shining brightly in the sky
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the sun is shining brightly in the sky then the arson occurred on elm street, and the sun is shining brightly in the sky, so it can be concluded that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the sun is shining brightly in the sky then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The sun is shining brightly in the sky
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the sun is shining brightly in the sky then the arson occurred on elm street, and the sun is shining brightly in the sky, so the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the sun is shining brightly in the sky then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The sun is shining brightly in the sky
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the sun is shining brightly in the sky then the arson occurred on elm street, and the sun is shining brightly in the sky, which implies that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the sun is shining brightly in the sky then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The sun is shining brightly in the sky
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the sun is shining brightly in the sky then the arson occurred on elm street, and the sun is shining brightly in the sky, which shows that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the sun is shining brightly in the sky then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The sun is shining brightly in the sky
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the sun is shining brightly in the sky then the arson occurred on elm street, and the sun is shining brightly in the sky, which establishes that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the sun is shining brightly in the sky then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The sun is shining brightly in the sky
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, since if the sun is shining brightly in the sky then the arson occurred on elm street and the sun is shining brightly in the sky.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the sun is shining brightly in the sky then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The sun is shining brightly in the sky
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, because if the sun is shining brightly in the sky then the arson occurred on elm street and the sun is shining brightly in the sky.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the sun is shining brightly in the sky then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The sun is shining brightly in the sky
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, as if the sun is shining brightly in the sky then the arson occurred on elm street and the sun is shining brightly in the sky.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the sun is shining brightly in the sky then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The sun is shining brightly in the sky
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the sun is shining brightly in the sky then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, therefore the sun is not shining brightly in the sky.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the sun is shining brightly in the sky then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The sun is not shining brightly in the sky
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the sun is shining brightly in the sky then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, hence the sun is not shining brightly in the sky.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the sun is shining brightly in the sky then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The sun is not shining brightly in the sky
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the sun is shining brightly in the sky then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, thus the sun is not shining brightly in the sky.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the sun is shining brightly in the sky then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The sun is not shining brightly in the sky
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the sun is shining brightly in the sky then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so it can be concluded that the sun is not shining brightly in the sky.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the sun is shining brightly in the sky then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The sun is not shining brightly in the sky
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the sun is shining brightly in the sky then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so the sun is not shining brightly in the sky.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the sun is shining brightly in the sky then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The sun is not shining brightly in the sky
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the sun is shining brightly in the sky then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which implies that the sun is not shining brightly in the sky.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the sun is shining brightly in the sky then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The sun is not shining brightly in the sky
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the sun is shining brightly in the sky then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which shows that the sun is not shining brightly in the sky.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the sun is shining brightly in the sky then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The sun is not shining brightly in the sky
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the sun is shining brightly in the sky then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which establishes that the sun is not shining brightly in the sky.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the sun is shining brightly in the sky then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The sun is not shining brightly in the sky
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The sun is not shining brightly in the sky, since if the sun is shining brightly in the sky then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the sun is shining brightly in the sky then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The sun is not shining brightly in the sky
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The sun is not shining brightly in the sky, because if the sun is shining brightly in the sky then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the sun is shining brightly in the sky then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The sun is not shining brightly in the sky
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The sun is not shining brightly in the sky, as if the sun is shining brightly in the sky then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the sun is shining brightly in the sky then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The sun is not shining brightly in the sky
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the cat is purring contentedly then the arson occurred on elm street, and the cat is purring contentedly, therefore the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the cat is purring contentedly then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The cat is purring contentedly
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the cat is purring contentedly then the arson occurred on elm street, and the cat is purring contentedly, hence the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the cat is purring contentedly then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The cat is purring contentedly
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the cat is purring contentedly then the arson occurred on elm street, and the cat is purring contentedly, thus the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the cat is purring contentedly then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The cat is purring contentedly
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the cat is purring contentedly then the arson occurred on elm street, and the cat is purring contentedly, so it can be concluded that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the cat is purring contentedly then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The cat is purring contentedly
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the cat is purring contentedly then the arson occurred on elm street, and the cat is purring contentedly, so the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the cat is purring contentedly then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The cat is purring contentedly
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the cat is purring contentedly then the arson occurred on elm street, and the cat is purring contentedly, which implies that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the cat is purring contentedly then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The cat is purring contentedly
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the cat is purring contentedly then the arson occurred on elm street, and the cat is purring contentedly, which shows that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the cat is purring contentedly then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The cat is purring contentedly
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the cat is purring contentedly then the arson occurred on elm street, and the cat is purring contentedly, which establishes that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the cat is purring contentedly then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The cat is purring contentedly
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, since if the cat is purring contentedly then the arson occurred on elm street and the cat is purring contentedly.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the cat is purring contentedly then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The cat is purring contentedly
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, because if the cat is purring contentedly then the arson occurred on elm street and the cat is purring contentedly.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the cat is purring contentedly then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The cat is purring contentedly
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, as if the cat is purring contentedly then the arson occurred on elm street and the cat is purring contentedly.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the cat is purring contentedly then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The cat is purring contentedly
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the cat is purring contentedly then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, therefore the cat is not purring contentedly.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the cat is purring contentedly then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The cat is not purring contentedly
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the cat is purring contentedly then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, hence the cat is not purring contentedly.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the cat is purring contentedly then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The cat is not purring contentedly
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the cat is purring contentedly then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, thus the cat is not purring contentedly.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the cat is purring contentedly then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The cat is not purring contentedly
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the cat is purring contentedly then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so it can be concluded that the cat is not purring contentedly.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the cat is purring contentedly then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The cat is not purring contentedly
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the cat is purring contentedly then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so the cat is not purring contentedly.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the cat is purring contentedly then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The cat is not purring contentedly
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the cat is purring contentedly then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which implies that the cat is not purring contentedly.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the cat is purring contentedly then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The cat is not purring contentedly
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the cat is purring contentedly then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which shows that the cat is not purring contentedly.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the cat is purring contentedly then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The cat is not purring contentedly
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the cat is purring contentedly then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which establishes that the cat is not purring contentedly.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the cat is purring contentedly then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The cat is not purring contentedly
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is not purring contentedly, since if the cat is purring contentedly then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the cat is purring contentedly then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The cat is not purring contentedly
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is not purring contentedly, because if the cat is purring contentedly then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the cat is purring contentedly then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The cat is not purring contentedly
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is not purring contentedly, as if the cat is purring contentedly then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the cat is purring contentedly then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The cat is not purring contentedly
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the baby is laughing at the toy then the arson occurred on elm street, and the baby is laughing at the toy, therefore the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is laughing at the toy then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The baby is laughing at the toy
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the baby is laughing at the toy then the arson occurred on elm street, and the baby is laughing at the toy, hence the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is laughing at the toy then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The baby is laughing at the toy
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the baby is laughing at the toy then the arson occurred on elm street, and the baby is laughing at the toy, thus the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is laughing at the toy then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The baby is laughing at the toy
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the baby is laughing at the toy then the arson occurred on elm street, and the baby is laughing at the toy, so it can be concluded that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is laughing at the toy then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The baby is laughing at the toy
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the baby is laughing at the toy then the arson occurred on elm street, and the baby is laughing at the toy, so the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is laughing at the toy then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The baby is laughing at the toy
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the baby is laughing at the toy then the arson occurred on elm street, and the baby is laughing at the toy, which implies that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is laughing at the toy then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The baby is laughing at the toy
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the baby is laughing at the toy then the arson occurred on elm street, and the baby is laughing at the toy, which shows that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is laughing at the toy then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The baby is laughing at the toy
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the baby is laughing at the toy then the arson occurred on elm street, and the baby is laughing at the toy, which establishes that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is laughing at the toy then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The baby is laughing at the toy
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, since if the baby is laughing at the toy then the arson occurred on elm street and the baby is laughing at the toy.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is laughing at the toy then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The baby is laughing at the toy
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, because if the baby is laughing at the toy then the arson occurred on elm street and the baby is laughing at the toy.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is laughing at the toy then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The baby is laughing at the toy
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, as if the baby is laughing at the toy then the arson occurred on elm street and the baby is laughing at the toy.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is laughing at the toy then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The baby is laughing at the toy
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the baby is laughing at the toy then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, therefore the baby is not laughing at the toy.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is laughing at the toy then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The baby is not laughing at the toy
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the baby is laughing at the toy then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, hence the baby is not laughing at the toy.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is laughing at the toy then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The baby is not laughing at the toy
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the baby is laughing at the toy then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, thus the baby is not laughing at the toy.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is laughing at the toy then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The baby is not laughing at the toy
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the baby is laughing at the toy then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so it can be concluded that the baby is not laughing at the toy.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is laughing at the toy then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The baby is not laughing at the toy
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the baby is laughing at the toy then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so the baby is not laughing at the toy.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is laughing at the toy then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The baby is not laughing at the toy
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the baby is laughing at the toy then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which implies that the baby is not laughing at the toy.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is laughing at the toy then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The baby is not laughing at the toy
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the baby is laughing at the toy then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which shows that the baby is not laughing at the toy.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is laughing at the toy then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The baby is not laughing at the toy
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the baby is laughing at the toy then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which establishes that the baby is not laughing at the toy.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is laughing at the toy then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The baby is not laughing at the toy
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The baby is not laughing at the toy, since if the baby is laughing at the toy then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is laughing at the toy then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The baby is not laughing at the toy
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The baby is not laughing at the toy, because if the baby is laughing at the toy then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is laughing at the toy then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The baby is not laughing at the toy
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The baby is not laughing at the toy, as if the baby is laughing at the toy then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is laughing at the toy then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The baby is not laughing at the toy
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the car is a hybrid then the arson occurred on elm street, and the car is a hybrid, therefore the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the car is a hybrid then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The car is a hybrid
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the car is a hybrid then the arson occurred on elm street, and the car is a hybrid, hence the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the car is a hybrid then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The car is a hybrid
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the car is a hybrid then the arson occurred on elm street, and the car is a hybrid, thus the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the car is a hybrid then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The car is a hybrid
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the car is a hybrid then the arson occurred on elm street, and the car is a hybrid, so it can be concluded that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the car is a hybrid then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The car is a hybrid
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the car is a hybrid then the arson occurred on elm street, and the car is a hybrid, so the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the car is a hybrid then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The car is a hybrid
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the car is a hybrid then the arson occurred on elm street, and the car is a hybrid, which implies that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the car is a hybrid then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The car is a hybrid
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the car is a hybrid then the arson occurred on elm street, and the car is a hybrid, which shows that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the car is a hybrid then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The car is a hybrid
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the car is a hybrid then the arson occurred on elm street, and the car is a hybrid, which establishes that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the car is a hybrid then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The car is a hybrid
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, since if the car is a hybrid then the arson occurred on elm street and the car is a hybrid.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the car is a hybrid then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The car is a hybrid
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, because if the car is a hybrid then the arson occurred on elm street and the car is a hybrid.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the car is a hybrid then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The car is a hybrid
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, as if the car is a hybrid then the arson occurred on elm street and the car is a hybrid.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the car is a hybrid then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The car is a hybrid
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the car is a hybrid then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, therefore the car is not a hybrid.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the car is a hybrid then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The car is not a hybrid
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the car is a hybrid then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, hence the car is not a hybrid.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the car is a hybrid then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The car is not a hybrid
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the car is a hybrid then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, thus the car is not a hybrid.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the car is a hybrid then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The car is not a hybrid
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the car is a hybrid then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so it can be concluded that the car is not a hybrid.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the car is a hybrid then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The car is not a hybrid
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the car is a hybrid then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so the car is not a hybrid.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the car is a hybrid then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The car is not a hybrid
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the car is a hybrid then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which implies that the car is not a hybrid.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the car is a hybrid then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The car is not a hybrid
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the car is a hybrid then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which shows that the car is not a hybrid.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the car is a hybrid then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The car is not a hybrid
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the car is a hybrid then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which establishes that the car is not a hybrid.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the car is a hybrid then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The car is not a hybrid
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The car is not a hybrid, since if the car is a hybrid then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the car is a hybrid then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The car is not a hybrid
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The car is not a hybrid, because if the car is a hybrid then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the car is a hybrid then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The car is not a hybrid
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The car is not a hybrid, as if the car is a hybrid then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the car is a hybrid then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The car is not a hybrid
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the book is written by a famous author then the arson occurred on elm street, and the book is written by a famous author, therefore the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the book is written by a famous author then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The book is written by a famous author
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.