<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street, and officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene, therefore the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
stringlengths 355
1.02k
|
|---|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is not eating food, as if the cat is eating food then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the cat is eating food then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The cat is not eating food
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the dog is barking at the mailman then the arson occurred on elm street, and the dog is barking at the mailman, therefore the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the dog is barking at the mailman then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The dog is barking at the mailman
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the dog is barking at the mailman then the arson occurred on elm street, and the dog is barking at the mailman, hence the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the dog is barking at the mailman then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The dog is barking at the mailman
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the dog is barking at the mailman then the arson occurred on elm street, and the dog is barking at the mailman, thus the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the dog is barking at the mailman then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The dog is barking at the mailman
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the dog is barking at the mailman then the arson occurred on elm street, and the dog is barking at the mailman, so it can be concluded that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the dog is barking at the mailman then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The dog is barking at the mailman
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the dog is barking at the mailman then the arson occurred on elm street, and the dog is barking at the mailman, so the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the dog is barking at the mailman then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The dog is barking at the mailman
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the dog is barking at the mailman then the arson occurred on elm street, and the dog is barking at the mailman, which implies that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the dog is barking at the mailman then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The dog is barking at the mailman
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the dog is barking at the mailman then the arson occurred on elm street, and the dog is barking at the mailman, which shows that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the dog is barking at the mailman then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The dog is barking at the mailman
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the dog is barking at the mailman then the arson occurred on elm street, and the dog is barking at the mailman, which establishes that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the dog is barking at the mailman then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The dog is barking at the mailman
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, since if the dog is barking at the mailman then the arson occurred on elm street and the dog is barking at the mailman.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the dog is barking at the mailman then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The dog is barking at the mailman
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, because if the dog is barking at the mailman then the arson occurred on elm street and the dog is barking at the mailman.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the dog is barking at the mailman then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The dog is barking at the mailman
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, as if the dog is barking at the mailman then the arson occurred on elm street and the dog is barking at the mailman.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the dog is barking at the mailman then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The dog is barking at the mailman
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the dog is barking at the mailman then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, therefore the dog is not barking at the mailman.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the dog is barking at the mailman then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The dog is not barking at the mailman
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the dog is barking at the mailman then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, hence the dog is not barking at the mailman.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the dog is barking at the mailman then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The dog is not barking at the mailman
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the dog is barking at the mailman then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, thus the dog is not barking at the mailman.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the dog is barking at the mailman then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The dog is not barking at the mailman
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the dog is barking at the mailman then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so it can be concluded that the dog is not barking at the mailman.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the dog is barking at the mailman then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The dog is not barking at the mailman
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the dog is barking at the mailman then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so the dog is not barking at the mailman.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the dog is barking at the mailman then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The dog is not barking at the mailman
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the dog is barking at the mailman then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which implies that the dog is not barking at the mailman.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the dog is barking at the mailman then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The dog is not barking at the mailman
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the dog is barking at the mailman then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which shows that the dog is not barking at the mailman.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the dog is barking at the mailman then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The dog is not barking at the mailman
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the dog is barking at the mailman then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which establishes that the dog is not barking at the mailman.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the dog is barking at the mailman then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The dog is not barking at the mailman
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The dog is not barking at the mailman, since if the dog is barking at the mailman then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the dog is barking at the mailman then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The dog is not barking at the mailman
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The dog is not barking at the mailman, because if the dog is barking at the mailman then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the dog is barking at the mailman then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The dog is not barking at the mailman
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The dog is not barking at the mailman, as if the dog is barking at the mailman then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the dog is barking at the mailman then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The dog is not barking at the mailman
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the book is on the bestseller list then the arson occurred on elm street, and the book is on the bestseller list, therefore the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the book is on the bestseller list then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The book is on the bestseller list
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the book is on the bestseller list then the arson occurred on elm street, and the book is on the bestseller list, hence the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the book is on the bestseller list then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The book is on the bestseller list
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the book is on the bestseller list then the arson occurred on elm street, and the book is on the bestseller list, thus the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the book is on the bestseller list then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The book is on the bestseller list
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the book is on the bestseller list then the arson occurred on elm street, and the book is on the bestseller list, so it can be concluded that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the book is on the bestseller list then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The book is on the bestseller list
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the book is on the bestseller list then the arson occurred on elm street, and the book is on the bestseller list, so the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the book is on the bestseller list then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The book is on the bestseller list
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the book is on the bestseller list then the arson occurred on elm street, and the book is on the bestseller list, which implies that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the book is on the bestseller list then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The book is on the bestseller list
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the book is on the bestseller list then the arson occurred on elm street, and the book is on the bestseller list, which shows that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the book is on the bestseller list then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The book is on the bestseller list
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the book is on the bestseller list then the arson occurred on elm street, and the book is on the bestseller list, which establishes that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the book is on the bestseller list then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The book is on the bestseller list
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, since if the book is on the bestseller list then the arson occurred on elm street and the book is on the bestseller list.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the book is on the bestseller list then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The book is on the bestseller list
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, because if the book is on the bestseller list then the arson occurred on elm street and the book is on the bestseller list.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the book is on the bestseller list then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The book is on the bestseller list
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, as if the book is on the bestseller list then the arson occurred on elm street and the book is on the bestseller list.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the book is on the bestseller list then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The book is on the bestseller list
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the book is on the bestseller list then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, therefore the book is not on the bestseller list.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the book is on the bestseller list then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The book is not on the bestseller list
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the book is on the bestseller list then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, hence the book is not on the bestseller list.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the book is on the bestseller list then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The book is not on the bestseller list
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the book is on the bestseller list then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, thus the book is not on the bestseller list.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the book is on the bestseller list then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The book is not on the bestseller list
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the book is on the bestseller list then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so it can be concluded that the book is not on the bestseller list.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the book is on the bestseller list then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The book is not on the bestseller list
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the book is on the bestseller list then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so the book is not on the bestseller list.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the book is on the bestseller list then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The book is not on the bestseller list
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the book is on the bestseller list then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which implies that the book is not on the bestseller list.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the book is on the bestseller list then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The book is not on the bestseller list
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the book is on the bestseller list then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which shows that the book is not on the bestseller list.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the book is on the bestseller list then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The book is not on the bestseller list
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the book is on the bestseller list then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which establishes that the book is not on the bestseller list.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the book is on the bestseller list then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The book is not on the bestseller list
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The book is not on the bestseller list, since if the book is on the bestseller list then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the book is on the bestseller list then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The book is not on the bestseller list
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The book is not on the bestseller list, because if the book is on the bestseller list then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the book is on the bestseller list then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The book is not on the bestseller list
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The book is not on the bestseller list, as if the book is on the bestseller list then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the book is on the bestseller list then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The book is not on the bestseller list
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the movie is a horror film then the arson occurred on elm street, and the movie is a horror film, therefore the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the movie is a horror film then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The movie is a horror film
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the movie is a horror film then the arson occurred on elm street, and the movie is a horror film, hence the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the movie is a horror film then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The movie is a horror film
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the movie is a horror film then the arson occurred on elm street, and the movie is a horror film, thus the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the movie is a horror film then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The movie is a horror film
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the movie is a horror film then the arson occurred on elm street, and the movie is a horror film, so it can be concluded that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the movie is a horror film then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The movie is a horror film
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the movie is a horror film then the arson occurred on elm street, and the movie is a horror film, so the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the movie is a horror film then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The movie is a horror film
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the movie is a horror film then the arson occurred on elm street, and the movie is a horror film, which implies that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the movie is a horror film then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The movie is a horror film
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the movie is a horror film then the arson occurred on elm street, and the movie is a horror film, which shows that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the movie is a horror film then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The movie is a horror film
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the movie is a horror film then the arson occurred on elm street, and the movie is a horror film, which establishes that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the movie is a horror film then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The movie is a horror film
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, since if the movie is a horror film then the arson occurred on elm street and the movie is a horror film.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the movie is a horror film then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The movie is a horror film
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, because if the movie is a horror film then the arson occurred on elm street and the movie is a horror film.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the movie is a horror film then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The movie is a horror film
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, as if the movie is a horror film then the arson occurred on elm street and the movie is a horror film.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the movie is a horror film then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The movie is a horror film
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the movie is a horror film then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, therefore the movie is not a horror film.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the movie is a horror film then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The movie is not a horror film
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the movie is a horror film then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, hence the movie is not a horror film.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the movie is a horror film then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The movie is not a horror film
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the movie is a horror film then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, thus the movie is not a horror film.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the movie is a horror film then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The movie is not a horror film
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the movie is a horror film then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so it can be concluded that the movie is not a horror film.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the movie is a horror film then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The movie is not a horror film
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the movie is a horror film then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so the movie is not a horror film.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the movie is a horror film then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The movie is not a horror film
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the movie is a horror film then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which implies that the movie is not a horror film.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the movie is a horror film then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The movie is not a horror film
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the movie is a horror film then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which shows that the movie is not a horror film.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the movie is a horror film then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The movie is not a horror film
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the movie is a horror film then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which establishes that the movie is not a horror film.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the movie is a horror film then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The movie is not a horror film
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The movie is not a horror film, since if the movie is a horror film then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the movie is a horror film then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The movie is not a horror film
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The movie is not a horror film, because if the movie is a horror film then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the movie is a horror film then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The movie is not a horror film
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The movie is not a horror film, as if the movie is a horror film then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the movie is a horror film then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The movie is not a horror film
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the baby is crawling towards the cat then the arson occurred on elm street, and the baby is crawling towards the cat, therefore the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is crawling towards the cat then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The baby is crawling towards the cat
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the baby is crawling towards the cat then the arson occurred on elm street, and the baby is crawling towards the cat, hence the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is crawling towards the cat then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The baby is crawling towards the cat
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the baby is crawling towards the cat then the arson occurred on elm street, and the baby is crawling towards the cat, thus the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is crawling towards the cat then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The baby is crawling towards the cat
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the baby is crawling towards the cat then the arson occurred on elm street, and the baby is crawling towards the cat, so it can be concluded that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is crawling towards the cat then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The baby is crawling towards the cat
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the baby is crawling towards the cat then the arson occurred on elm street, and the baby is crawling towards the cat, so the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is crawling towards the cat then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The baby is crawling towards the cat
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the baby is crawling towards the cat then the arson occurred on elm street, and the baby is crawling towards the cat, which implies that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is crawling towards the cat then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The baby is crawling towards the cat
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the baby is crawling towards the cat then the arson occurred on elm street, and the baby is crawling towards the cat, which shows that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is crawling towards the cat then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The baby is crawling towards the cat
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the baby is crawling towards the cat then the arson occurred on elm street, and the baby is crawling towards the cat, which establishes that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is crawling towards the cat then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The baby is crawling towards the cat
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, since if the baby is crawling towards the cat then the arson occurred on elm street and the baby is crawling towards the cat.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is crawling towards the cat then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The baby is crawling towards the cat
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, because if the baby is crawling towards the cat then the arson occurred on elm street and the baby is crawling towards the cat.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is crawling towards the cat then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The baby is crawling towards the cat
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, as if the baby is crawling towards the cat then the arson occurred on elm street and the baby is crawling towards the cat.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is crawling towards the cat then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The baby is crawling towards the cat
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the baby is crawling towards the cat then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, therefore the baby is not crawling towards the cat.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is crawling towards the cat then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The baby is not crawling towards the cat
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the baby is crawling towards the cat then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, hence the baby is not crawling towards the cat.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is crawling towards the cat then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The baby is not crawling towards the cat
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the baby is crawling towards the cat then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, thus the baby is not crawling towards the cat.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is crawling towards the cat then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The baby is not crawling towards the cat
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the baby is crawling towards the cat then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so it can be concluded that the baby is not crawling towards the cat.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is crawling towards the cat then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The baby is not crawling towards the cat
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the baby is crawling towards the cat then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so the baby is not crawling towards the cat.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is crawling towards the cat then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The baby is not crawling towards the cat
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the baby is crawling towards the cat then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which implies that the baby is not crawling towards the cat.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is crawling towards the cat then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The baby is not crawling towards the cat
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the baby is crawling towards the cat then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which shows that the baby is not crawling towards the cat.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is crawling towards the cat then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The baby is not crawling towards the cat
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the baby is crawling towards the cat then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which establishes that the baby is not crawling towards the cat.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is crawling towards the cat then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The baby is not crawling towards the cat
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The baby is not crawling towards the cat, since if the baby is crawling towards the cat then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is crawling towards the cat then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The baby is not crawling towards the cat
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The baby is not crawling towards the cat, because if the baby is crawling towards the cat then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is crawling towards the cat then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The baby is not crawling towards the cat
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The baby is not crawling towards the cat, as if the baby is crawling towards the cat then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is crawling towards the cat then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The baby is not crawling towards the cat
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the dog is barking at the neighbors then the arson occurred on elm street, and the dog is barking at the neighbors, therefore the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the dog is barking at the neighbors then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The dog is barking at the neighbors
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the dog is barking at the neighbors then the arson occurred on elm street, and the dog is barking at the neighbors, hence the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the dog is barking at the neighbors then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The dog is barking at the neighbors
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the dog is barking at the neighbors then the arson occurred on elm street, and the dog is barking at the neighbors, thus the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the dog is barking at the neighbors then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The dog is barking at the neighbors
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the dog is barking at the neighbors then the arson occurred on elm street, and the dog is barking at the neighbors, so it can be concluded that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the dog is barking at the neighbors then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The dog is barking at the neighbors
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the dog is barking at the neighbors then the arson occurred on elm street, and the dog is barking at the neighbors, so the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the dog is barking at the neighbors then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The dog is barking at the neighbors
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the dog is barking at the neighbors then the arson occurred on elm street, and the dog is barking at the neighbors, which implies that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the dog is barking at the neighbors then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The dog is barking at the neighbors
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the dog is barking at the neighbors then the arson occurred on elm street, and the dog is barking at the neighbors, which shows that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the dog is barking at the neighbors then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The dog is barking at the neighbors
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the dog is barking at the neighbors then the arson occurred on elm street, and the dog is barking at the neighbors, which establishes that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the dog is barking at the neighbors then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The dog is barking at the neighbors
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, since if the dog is barking at the neighbors then the arson occurred on elm street and the dog is barking at the neighbors.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the dog is barking at the neighbors then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The dog is barking at the neighbors
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, because if the dog is barking at the neighbors then the arson occurred on elm street and the dog is barking at the neighbors.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the dog is barking at the neighbors then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The dog is barking at the neighbors
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, as if the dog is barking at the neighbors then the arson occurred on elm street and the dog is barking at the neighbors.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the dog is barking at the neighbors then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The dog is barking at the neighbors
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.