<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street, and officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene, therefore the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
stringlengths 355
1.02k
|
|---|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The baby is not playing with toys, since if the baby is playing with toys then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is playing with toys then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The baby is not playing with toys
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The baby is not playing with toys, because if the baby is playing with toys then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is playing with toys then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The baby is not playing with toys
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The baby is not playing with toys, as if the baby is playing with toys then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is playing with toys then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The baby is not playing with toys
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the dog is barking loudly then the arson occurred on elm street, and the dog is barking loudly, therefore the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the dog is barking loudly then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The dog is barking loudly
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the dog is barking loudly then the arson occurred on elm street, and the dog is barking loudly, hence the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the dog is barking loudly then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The dog is barking loudly
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the dog is barking loudly then the arson occurred on elm street, and the dog is barking loudly, thus the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the dog is barking loudly then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The dog is barking loudly
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the dog is barking loudly then the arson occurred on elm street, and the dog is barking loudly, so it can be concluded that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the dog is barking loudly then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The dog is barking loudly
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the dog is barking loudly then the arson occurred on elm street, and the dog is barking loudly, so the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the dog is barking loudly then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The dog is barking loudly
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the dog is barking loudly then the arson occurred on elm street, and the dog is barking loudly, which implies that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the dog is barking loudly then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The dog is barking loudly
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the dog is barking loudly then the arson occurred on elm street, and the dog is barking loudly, which shows that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the dog is barking loudly then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The dog is barking loudly
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the dog is barking loudly then the arson occurred on elm street, and the dog is barking loudly, which establishes that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the dog is barking loudly then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The dog is barking loudly
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, since if the dog is barking loudly then the arson occurred on elm street and the dog is barking loudly.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the dog is barking loudly then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The dog is barking loudly
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, because if the dog is barking loudly then the arson occurred on elm street and the dog is barking loudly.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the dog is barking loudly then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The dog is barking loudly
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, as if the dog is barking loudly then the arson occurred on elm street and the dog is barking loudly.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the dog is barking loudly then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The dog is barking loudly
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the dog is barking loudly then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, therefore the dog is not barking loudly.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the dog is barking loudly then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The dog is not barking loudly
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the dog is barking loudly then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, hence the dog is not barking loudly.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the dog is barking loudly then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The dog is not barking loudly
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the dog is barking loudly then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, thus the dog is not barking loudly.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the dog is barking loudly then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The dog is not barking loudly
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the dog is barking loudly then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so it can be concluded that the dog is not barking loudly.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the dog is barking loudly then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The dog is not barking loudly
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the dog is barking loudly then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so the dog is not barking loudly.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the dog is barking loudly then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The dog is not barking loudly
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the dog is barking loudly then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which implies that the dog is not barking loudly.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the dog is barking loudly then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The dog is not barking loudly
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the dog is barking loudly then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which shows that the dog is not barking loudly.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the dog is barking loudly then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The dog is not barking loudly
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the dog is barking loudly then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which establishes that the dog is not barking loudly.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the dog is barking loudly then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The dog is not barking loudly
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The dog is not barking loudly, since if the dog is barking loudly then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the dog is barking loudly then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The dog is not barking loudly
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The dog is not barking loudly, because if the dog is barking loudly then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the dog is barking loudly then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The dog is not barking loudly
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The dog is not barking loudly, as if the dog is barking loudly then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the dog is barking loudly then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The dog is not barking loudly
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the cat is sleeping soundly then the arson occurred on elm street, and the cat is sleeping soundly, therefore the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the cat is sleeping soundly then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The cat is sleeping soundly
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the cat is sleeping soundly then the arson occurred on elm street, and the cat is sleeping soundly, hence the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the cat is sleeping soundly then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The cat is sleeping soundly
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the cat is sleeping soundly then the arson occurred on elm street, and the cat is sleeping soundly, thus the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the cat is sleeping soundly then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The cat is sleeping soundly
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the cat is sleeping soundly then the arson occurred on elm street, and the cat is sleeping soundly, so it can be concluded that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the cat is sleeping soundly then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The cat is sleeping soundly
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the cat is sleeping soundly then the arson occurred on elm street, and the cat is sleeping soundly, so the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the cat is sleeping soundly then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The cat is sleeping soundly
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the cat is sleeping soundly then the arson occurred on elm street, and the cat is sleeping soundly, which implies that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the cat is sleeping soundly then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The cat is sleeping soundly
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the cat is sleeping soundly then the arson occurred on elm street, and the cat is sleeping soundly, which shows that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the cat is sleeping soundly then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The cat is sleeping soundly
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the cat is sleeping soundly then the arson occurred on elm street, and the cat is sleeping soundly, which establishes that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the cat is sleeping soundly then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The cat is sleeping soundly
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, since if the cat is sleeping soundly then the arson occurred on elm street and the cat is sleeping soundly.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the cat is sleeping soundly then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The cat is sleeping soundly
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, because if the cat is sleeping soundly then the arson occurred on elm street and the cat is sleeping soundly.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the cat is sleeping soundly then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The cat is sleeping soundly
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, as if the cat is sleeping soundly then the arson occurred on elm street and the cat is sleeping soundly.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the cat is sleeping soundly then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The cat is sleeping soundly
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the cat is sleeping soundly then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, therefore the cat is not sleeping soundly.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the cat is sleeping soundly then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The cat is not sleeping soundly
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the cat is sleeping soundly then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, hence the cat is not sleeping soundly.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the cat is sleeping soundly then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The cat is not sleeping soundly
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the cat is sleeping soundly then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, thus the cat is not sleeping soundly.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the cat is sleeping soundly then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The cat is not sleeping soundly
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the cat is sleeping soundly then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so it can be concluded that the cat is not sleeping soundly.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the cat is sleeping soundly then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The cat is not sleeping soundly
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the cat is sleeping soundly then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so the cat is not sleeping soundly.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the cat is sleeping soundly then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The cat is not sleeping soundly
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the cat is sleeping soundly then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which implies that the cat is not sleeping soundly.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the cat is sleeping soundly then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The cat is not sleeping soundly
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the cat is sleeping soundly then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which shows that the cat is not sleeping soundly.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the cat is sleeping soundly then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The cat is not sleeping soundly
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the cat is sleeping soundly then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which establishes that the cat is not sleeping soundly.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the cat is sleeping soundly then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The cat is not sleeping soundly
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is not sleeping soundly, since if the cat is sleeping soundly then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the cat is sleeping soundly then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The cat is not sleeping soundly
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is not sleeping soundly, because if the cat is sleeping soundly then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the cat is sleeping soundly then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The cat is not sleeping soundly
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is not sleeping soundly, as if the cat is sleeping soundly then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the cat is sleeping soundly then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The cat is not sleeping soundly
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the book is a bestseller then the arson occurred on elm street, and the book is a bestseller, therefore the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the book is a bestseller then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The book is a bestseller
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the book is a bestseller then the arson occurred on elm street, and the book is a bestseller, hence the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the book is a bestseller then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The book is a bestseller
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the book is a bestseller then the arson occurred on elm street, and the book is a bestseller, thus the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the book is a bestseller then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The book is a bestseller
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the book is a bestseller then the arson occurred on elm street, and the book is a bestseller, so it can be concluded that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the book is a bestseller then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The book is a bestseller
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the book is a bestseller then the arson occurred on elm street, and the book is a bestseller, so the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the book is a bestseller then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The book is a bestseller
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the book is a bestseller then the arson occurred on elm street, and the book is a bestseller, which implies that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the book is a bestseller then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The book is a bestseller
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the book is a bestseller then the arson occurred on elm street, and the book is a bestseller, which shows that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the book is a bestseller then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The book is a bestseller
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the book is a bestseller then the arson occurred on elm street, and the book is a bestseller, which establishes that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the book is a bestseller then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The book is a bestseller
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, since if the book is a bestseller then the arson occurred on elm street and the book is a bestseller.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the book is a bestseller then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The book is a bestseller
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, because if the book is a bestseller then the arson occurred on elm street and the book is a bestseller.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the book is a bestseller then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The book is a bestseller
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, as if the book is a bestseller then the arson occurred on elm street and the book is a bestseller.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the book is a bestseller then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The book is a bestseller
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the book is a bestseller then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, therefore the book is not a bestseller.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the book is a bestseller then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The book is not a bestseller
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the book is a bestseller then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, hence the book is not a bestseller.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the book is a bestseller then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The book is not a bestseller
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the book is a bestseller then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, thus the book is not a bestseller.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the book is a bestseller then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The book is not a bestseller
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the book is a bestseller then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so it can be concluded that the book is not a bestseller.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the book is a bestseller then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The book is not a bestseller
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the book is a bestseller then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so the book is not a bestseller.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the book is a bestseller then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The book is not a bestseller
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the book is a bestseller then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which implies that the book is not a bestseller.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the book is a bestseller then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The book is not a bestseller
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the book is a bestseller then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which shows that the book is not a bestseller.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the book is a bestseller then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The book is not a bestseller
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the book is a bestseller then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which establishes that the book is not a bestseller.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the book is a bestseller then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The book is not a bestseller
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The book is not a bestseller, since if the book is a bestseller then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the book is a bestseller then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The book is not a bestseller
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The book is not a bestseller, because if the book is a bestseller then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the book is a bestseller then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The book is not a bestseller
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The book is not a bestseller, as if the book is a bestseller then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the book is a bestseller then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The book is not a bestseller
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the movie is a comedy then the arson occurred on elm street, and the movie is a comedy, therefore the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the movie is a comedy then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The movie is a comedy
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the movie is a comedy then the arson occurred on elm street, and the movie is a comedy, hence the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the movie is a comedy then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The movie is a comedy
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the movie is a comedy then the arson occurred on elm street, and the movie is a comedy, thus the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the movie is a comedy then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The movie is a comedy
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the movie is a comedy then the arson occurred on elm street, and the movie is a comedy, so it can be concluded that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the movie is a comedy then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The movie is a comedy
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the movie is a comedy then the arson occurred on elm street, and the movie is a comedy, so the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the movie is a comedy then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The movie is a comedy
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the movie is a comedy then the arson occurred on elm street, and the movie is a comedy, which implies that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the movie is a comedy then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The movie is a comedy
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the movie is a comedy then the arson occurred on elm street, and the movie is a comedy, which shows that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the movie is a comedy then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The movie is a comedy
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the movie is a comedy then the arson occurred on elm street, and the movie is a comedy, which establishes that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the movie is a comedy then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The movie is a comedy
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, since if the movie is a comedy then the arson occurred on elm street and the movie is a comedy.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the movie is a comedy then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The movie is a comedy
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, because if the movie is a comedy then the arson occurred on elm street and the movie is a comedy.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the movie is a comedy then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The movie is a comedy
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, as if the movie is a comedy then the arson occurred on elm street and the movie is a comedy.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the movie is a comedy then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The movie is a comedy
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the movie is a comedy then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, therefore the movie is not a comedy.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the movie is a comedy then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The movie is not a comedy
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the movie is a comedy then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, hence the movie is not a comedy.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the movie is a comedy then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The movie is not a comedy
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the movie is a comedy then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, thus the movie is not a comedy.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the movie is a comedy then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The movie is not a comedy
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the movie is a comedy then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so it can be concluded that the movie is not a comedy.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the movie is a comedy then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The movie is not a comedy
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the movie is a comedy then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so the movie is not a comedy.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the movie is a comedy then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The movie is not a comedy
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the movie is a comedy then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which implies that the movie is not a comedy.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the movie is a comedy then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The movie is not a comedy
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the movie is a comedy then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which shows that the movie is not a comedy.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the movie is a comedy then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The movie is not a comedy
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the movie is a comedy then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which establishes that the movie is not a comedy.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the movie is a comedy then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The movie is not a comedy
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The movie is not a comedy, since if the movie is a comedy then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the movie is a comedy then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The movie is not a comedy
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The movie is not a comedy, because if the movie is a comedy then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the movie is a comedy then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The movie is not a comedy
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The movie is not a comedy, as if the movie is a comedy then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the movie is a comedy then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The movie is not a comedy
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the weather is cold and rainy then the arson occurred on elm street, and the weather is cold and rainy, therefore the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the weather is cold and rainy then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The weather is cold and rainy
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the weather is cold and rainy then the arson occurred on elm street, and the weather is cold and rainy, hence the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the weather is cold and rainy then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The weather is cold and rainy
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the weather is cold and rainy then the arson occurred on elm street, and the weather is cold and rainy, thus the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the weather is cold and rainy then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The weather is cold and rainy
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the weather is cold and rainy then the arson occurred on elm street, and the weather is cold and rainy, so it can be concluded that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the weather is cold and rainy then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The weather is cold and rainy
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the weather is cold and rainy then the arson occurred on elm street, and the weather is cold and rainy, so the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the weather is cold and rainy then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The weather is cold and rainy
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the weather is cold and rainy then the arson occurred on elm street, and the weather is cold and rainy, which implies that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the weather is cold and rainy then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The weather is cold and rainy
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the weather is cold and rainy then the arson occurred on elm street, and the weather is cold and rainy, which shows that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the weather is cold and rainy then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The weather is cold and rainy
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the weather is cold and rainy then the arson occurred on elm street, and the weather is cold and rainy, which establishes that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the weather is cold and rainy then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The weather is cold and rainy
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, since if the weather is cold and rainy then the arson occurred on elm street and the weather is cold and rainy.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the weather is cold and rainy then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The weather is cold and rainy
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.