<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street, and officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene, therefore the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
stringlengths 355
1.02k
|
|---|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the movie is exciting then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which shows that the movie is not exciting.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the movie is exciting then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The movie is not exciting
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the movie is exciting then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which establishes that the movie is not exciting.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the movie is exciting then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The movie is not exciting
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The movie is not exciting, since if the movie is exciting then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the movie is exciting then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The movie is not exciting
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The movie is not exciting, because if the movie is exciting then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the movie is exciting then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The movie is not exciting
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The movie is not exciting, as if the movie is exciting then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the movie is exciting then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The movie is not exciting
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the weather is nice then the arson occurred on elm street, and the weather is nice, therefore the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the weather is nice then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The weather is nice
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the weather is nice then the arson occurred on elm street, and the weather is nice, hence the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the weather is nice then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The weather is nice
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the weather is nice then the arson occurred on elm street, and the weather is nice, thus the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the weather is nice then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The weather is nice
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the weather is nice then the arson occurred on elm street, and the weather is nice, so it can be concluded that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the weather is nice then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The weather is nice
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the weather is nice then the arson occurred on elm street, and the weather is nice, so the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the weather is nice then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The weather is nice
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the weather is nice then the arson occurred on elm street, and the weather is nice, which implies that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the weather is nice then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The weather is nice
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the weather is nice then the arson occurred on elm street, and the weather is nice, which shows that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the weather is nice then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The weather is nice
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the weather is nice then the arson occurred on elm street, and the weather is nice, which establishes that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the weather is nice then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The weather is nice
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, since if the weather is nice then the arson occurred on elm street and the weather is nice.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the weather is nice then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The weather is nice
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, because if the weather is nice then the arson occurred on elm street and the weather is nice.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the weather is nice then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The weather is nice
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, as if the weather is nice then the arson occurred on elm street and the weather is nice.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the weather is nice then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The weather is nice
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the weather is nice then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, therefore the weather is not nice.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the weather is nice then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The weather is not nice
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the weather is nice then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, hence the weather is not nice.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the weather is nice then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The weather is not nice
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the weather is nice then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, thus the weather is not nice.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the weather is nice then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The weather is not nice
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the weather is nice then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so it can be concluded that the weather is not nice.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the weather is nice then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The weather is not nice
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the weather is nice then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so the weather is not nice.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the weather is nice then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The weather is not nice
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the weather is nice then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which implies that the weather is not nice.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the weather is nice then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The weather is not nice
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the weather is nice then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which shows that the weather is not nice.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the weather is nice then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The weather is not nice
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the weather is nice then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which establishes that the weather is not nice.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the weather is nice then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The weather is not nice
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The weather is not nice, since if the weather is nice then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the weather is nice then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The weather is not nice
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The weather is not nice, because if the weather is nice then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the weather is nice then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The weather is not nice
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The weather is not nice, as if the weather is nice then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the weather is nice then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The weather is not nice
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the baby is crawling then the arson occurred on elm street, and the baby is crawling, therefore the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is crawling then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The baby is crawling
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the baby is crawling then the arson occurred on elm street, and the baby is crawling, hence the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is crawling then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The baby is crawling
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the baby is crawling then the arson occurred on elm street, and the baby is crawling, thus the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is crawling then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The baby is crawling
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the baby is crawling then the arson occurred on elm street, and the baby is crawling, so it can be concluded that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is crawling then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The baby is crawling
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the baby is crawling then the arson occurred on elm street, and the baby is crawling, so the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is crawling then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The baby is crawling
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the baby is crawling then the arson occurred on elm street, and the baby is crawling, which implies that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is crawling then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The baby is crawling
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the baby is crawling then the arson occurred on elm street, and the baby is crawling, which shows that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is crawling then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The baby is crawling
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the baby is crawling then the arson occurred on elm street, and the baby is crawling, which establishes that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is crawling then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The baby is crawling
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, since if the baby is crawling then the arson occurred on elm street and the baby is crawling.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is crawling then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The baby is crawling
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, because if the baby is crawling then the arson occurred on elm street and the baby is crawling.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is crawling then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The baby is crawling
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, as if the baby is crawling then the arson occurred on elm street and the baby is crawling.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is crawling then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The baby is crawling
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the baby is crawling then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, therefore the baby is not crawling.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is crawling then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The baby is not crawling
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the baby is crawling then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, hence the baby is not crawling.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is crawling then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The baby is not crawling
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the baby is crawling then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, thus the baby is not crawling.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is crawling then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The baby is not crawling
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the baby is crawling then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so it can be concluded that the baby is not crawling.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is crawling then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The baby is not crawling
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the baby is crawling then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so the baby is not crawling.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is crawling then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The baby is not crawling
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the baby is crawling then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which implies that the baby is not crawling.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is crawling then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The baby is not crawling
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the baby is crawling then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which shows that the baby is not crawling.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is crawling then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The baby is not crawling
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the baby is crawling then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which establishes that the baby is not crawling.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is crawling then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The baby is not crawling
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The baby is not crawling, since if the baby is crawling then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is crawling then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The baby is not crawling
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The baby is not crawling, because if the baby is crawling then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is crawling then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The baby is not crawling
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The baby is not crawling, as if the baby is crawling then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is crawling then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The baby is not crawling
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the dog is happy then the arson occurred on elm street, and the dog is happy, therefore the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the dog is happy then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The dog is happy
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the dog is happy then the arson occurred on elm street, and the dog is happy, hence the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the dog is happy then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The dog is happy
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the dog is happy then the arson occurred on elm street, and the dog is happy, thus the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the dog is happy then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The dog is happy
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the dog is happy then the arson occurred on elm street, and the dog is happy, so it can be concluded that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the dog is happy then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The dog is happy
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the dog is happy then the arson occurred on elm street, and the dog is happy, so the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the dog is happy then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The dog is happy
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the dog is happy then the arson occurred on elm street, and the dog is happy, which implies that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the dog is happy then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The dog is happy
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the dog is happy then the arson occurred on elm street, and the dog is happy, which shows that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the dog is happy then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The dog is happy
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the dog is happy then the arson occurred on elm street, and the dog is happy, which establishes that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the dog is happy then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The dog is happy
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, since if the dog is happy then the arson occurred on elm street and the dog is happy.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the dog is happy then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The dog is happy
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, because if the dog is happy then the arson occurred on elm street and the dog is happy.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the dog is happy then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The dog is happy
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, as if the dog is happy then the arson occurred on elm street and the dog is happy.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the dog is happy then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The dog is happy
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the dog is happy then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, therefore the dog is not happy.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the dog is happy then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The dog is not happy
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the dog is happy then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, hence the dog is not happy.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the dog is happy then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The dog is not happy
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the dog is happy then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, thus the dog is not happy.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the dog is happy then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The dog is not happy
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the dog is happy then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so it can be concluded that the dog is not happy.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the dog is happy then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The dog is not happy
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the dog is happy then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so the dog is not happy.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the dog is happy then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The dog is not happy
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the dog is happy then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which implies that the dog is not happy.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the dog is happy then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The dog is not happy
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the dog is happy then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which shows that the dog is not happy.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the dog is happy then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The dog is not happy
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the dog is happy then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which establishes that the dog is not happy.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the dog is happy then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The dog is not happy
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The dog is not happy, since if the dog is happy then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the dog is happy then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The dog is not happy
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The dog is not happy, because if the dog is happy then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the dog is happy then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The dog is not happy
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The dog is not happy, as if the dog is happy then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the dog is happy then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The dog is not happy
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the cat is purring then the arson occurred on elm street, and the cat is purring, therefore the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the cat is purring then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The cat is purring
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the cat is purring then the arson occurred on elm street, and the cat is purring, hence the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the cat is purring then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The cat is purring
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the cat is purring then the arson occurred on elm street, and the cat is purring, thus the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the cat is purring then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The cat is purring
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the cat is purring then the arson occurred on elm street, and the cat is purring, so it can be concluded that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the cat is purring then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The cat is purring
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the cat is purring then the arson occurred on elm street, and the cat is purring, so the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the cat is purring then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The cat is purring
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the cat is purring then the arson occurred on elm street, and the cat is purring, which implies that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the cat is purring then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The cat is purring
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the cat is purring then the arson occurred on elm street, and the cat is purring, which shows that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the cat is purring then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The cat is purring
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the cat is purring then the arson occurred on elm street, and the cat is purring, which establishes that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the cat is purring then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The cat is purring
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, since if the cat is purring then the arson occurred on elm street and the cat is purring.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the cat is purring then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The cat is purring
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, because if the cat is purring then the arson occurred on elm street and the cat is purring.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the cat is purring then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The cat is purring
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, as if the cat is purring then the arson occurred on elm street and the cat is purring.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the cat is purring then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The cat is purring
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the cat is purring then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, therefore the cat is not purring.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the cat is purring then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The cat is not purring
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the cat is purring then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, hence the cat is not purring.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the cat is purring then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The cat is not purring
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the cat is purring then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, thus the cat is not purring.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the cat is purring then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The cat is not purring
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the cat is purring then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so it can be concluded that the cat is not purring.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the cat is purring then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The cat is not purring
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the cat is purring then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so the cat is not purring.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the cat is purring then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The cat is not purring
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the cat is purring then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which implies that the cat is not purring.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the cat is purring then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The cat is not purring
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the cat is purring then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which shows that the cat is not purring.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the cat is purring then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The cat is not purring
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the cat is purring then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which establishes that the cat is not purring.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the cat is purring then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The cat is not purring
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is not purring, since if the cat is purring then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the cat is purring then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The cat is not purring
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is not purring, because if the cat is purring then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the cat is purring then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The cat is not purring
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is not purring, as if the cat is purring then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the cat is purring then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The cat is not purring
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the baby is crying loudly then the arson occurred on elm street, and the baby is crying loudly, therefore the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is crying loudly then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The baby is crying loudly
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the baby is crying loudly then the arson occurred on elm street, and the baby is crying loudly, hence the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is crying loudly then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The baby is crying loudly
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the baby is crying loudly then the arson occurred on elm street, and the baby is crying loudly, thus the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is crying loudly then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The baby is crying loudly
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the baby is crying loudly then the arson occurred on elm street, and the baby is crying loudly, so it can be concluded that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is crying loudly then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The baby is crying loudly
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the baby is crying loudly then the arson occurred on elm street, and the baby is crying loudly, so the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is crying loudly then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The baby is crying loudly
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the baby is crying loudly then the arson occurred on elm street, and the baby is crying loudly, which implies that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is crying loudly then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The baby is crying loudly
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the baby is crying loudly then the arson occurred on elm street, and the baby is crying loudly, which shows that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is crying loudly then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The baby is crying loudly
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.