<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street, and officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene, therefore the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
stringlengths 355
1.02k
|
|---|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, because if the weather is cold and rainy then the arson occurred on elm street and the weather is cold and rainy.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the weather is cold and rainy then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The weather is cold and rainy
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, as if the weather is cold and rainy then the arson occurred on elm street and the weather is cold and rainy.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the weather is cold and rainy then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The weather is cold and rainy
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the weather is cold and rainy then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, therefore the weather is not cold and rainy.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the weather is cold and rainy then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The weather is not cold and rainy
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the weather is cold and rainy then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, hence the weather is not cold and rainy.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the weather is cold and rainy then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The weather is not cold and rainy
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the weather is cold and rainy then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, thus the weather is not cold and rainy.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the weather is cold and rainy then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The weather is not cold and rainy
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the weather is cold and rainy then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so it can be concluded that the weather is not cold and rainy.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the weather is cold and rainy then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The weather is not cold and rainy
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the weather is cold and rainy then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so the weather is not cold and rainy.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the weather is cold and rainy then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The weather is not cold and rainy
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the weather is cold and rainy then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which implies that the weather is not cold and rainy.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the weather is cold and rainy then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The weather is not cold and rainy
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the weather is cold and rainy then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which shows that the weather is not cold and rainy.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the weather is cold and rainy then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The weather is not cold and rainy
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the weather is cold and rainy then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which establishes that the weather is not cold and rainy.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the weather is cold and rainy then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The weather is not cold and rainy
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The weather is not cold and rainy, since if the weather is cold and rainy then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the weather is cold and rainy then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The weather is not cold and rainy
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The weather is not cold and rainy, because if the weather is cold and rainy then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the weather is cold and rainy then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The weather is not cold and rainy
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The weather is not cold and rainy, as if the weather is cold and rainy then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the weather is cold and rainy then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The weather is not cold and rainy
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the baby is teething then the arson occurred on elm street, and the baby is teething, therefore the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is teething then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The baby is teething
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the baby is teething then the arson occurred on elm street, and the baby is teething, hence the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is teething then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The baby is teething
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the baby is teething then the arson occurred on elm street, and the baby is teething, thus the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is teething then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The baby is teething
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the baby is teething then the arson occurred on elm street, and the baby is teething, so it can be concluded that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is teething then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The baby is teething
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the baby is teething then the arson occurred on elm street, and the baby is teething, so the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is teething then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The baby is teething
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the baby is teething then the arson occurred on elm street, and the baby is teething, which implies that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is teething then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The baby is teething
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the baby is teething then the arson occurred on elm street, and the baby is teething, which shows that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is teething then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The baby is teething
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the baby is teething then the arson occurred on elm street, and the baby is teething, which establishes that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is teething then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The baby is teething
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, since if the baby is teething then the arson occurred on elm street and the baby is teething.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is teething then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The baby is teething
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, because if the baby is teething then the arson occurred on elm street and the baby is teething.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is teething then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The baby is teething
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, as if the baby is teething then the arson occurred on elm street and the baby is teething.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is teething then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The baby is teething
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the baby is teething then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, therefore the baby is not teething.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is teething then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The baby is not teething
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the baby is teething then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, hence the baby is not teething.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is teething then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The baby is not teething
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the baby is teething then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, thus the baby is not teething.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is teething then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The baby is not teething
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the baby is teething then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so it can be concluded that the baby is not teething.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is teething then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The baby is not teething
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the baby is teething then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so the baby is not teething.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is teething then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The baby is not teething
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the baby is teething then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which implies that the baby is not teething.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is teething then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The baby is not teething
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the baby is teething then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which shows that the baby is not teething.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is teething then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The baby is not teething
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the baby is teething then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which establishes that the baby is not teething.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is teething then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The baby is not teething
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The baby is not teething, since if the baby is teething then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is teething then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The baby is not teething
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The baby is not teething, because if the baby is teething then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is teething then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The baby is not teething
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The baby is not teething, as if the baby is teething then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is teething then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The baby is not teething
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the car is a sedan then the arson occurred on elm street, and the car is a sedan, therefore the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the car is a sedan then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The car is a sedan
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the car is a sedan then the arson occurred on elm street, and the car is a sedan, hence the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the car is a sedan then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The car is a sedan
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the car is a sedan then the arson occurred on elm street, and the car is a sedan, thus the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the car is a sedan then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The car is a sedan
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the car is a sedan then the arson occurred on elm street, and the car is a sedan, so it can be concluded that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the car is a sedan then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The car is a sedan
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the car is a sedan then the arson occurred on elm street, and the car is a sedan, so the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the car is a sedan then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The car is a sedan
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the car is a sedan then the arson occurred on elm street, and the car is a sedan, which implies that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the car is a sedan then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The car is a sedan
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the car is a sedan then the arson occurred on elm street, and the car is a sedan, which shows that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the car is a sedan then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The car is a sedan
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the car is a sedan then the arson occurred on elm street, and the car is a sedan, which establishes that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the car is a sedan then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The car is a sedan
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, since if the car is a sedan then the arson occurred on elm street and the car is a sedan.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the car is a sedan then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The car is a sedan
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, because if the car is a sedan then the arson occurred on elm street and the car is a sedan.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the car is a sedan then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The car is a sedan
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, as if the car is a sedan then the arson occurred on elm street and the car is a sedan.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the car is a sedan then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The car is a sedan
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the car is a sedan then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, therefore the car is not a sedan.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the car is a sedan then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The car is not a sedan
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the car is a sedan then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, hence the car is not a sedan.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the car is a sedan then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The car is not a sedan
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the car is a sedan then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, thus the car is not a sedan.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the car is a sedan then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The car is not a sedan
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the car is a sedan then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so it can be concluded that the car is not a sedan.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the car is a sedan then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The car is not a sedan
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the car is a sedan then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so the car is not a sedan.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the car is a sedan then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The car is not a sedan
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the car is a sedan then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which implies that the car is not a sedan.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the car is a sedan then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The car is not a sedan
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the car is a sedan then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which shows that the car is not a sedan.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the car is a sedan then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The car is not a sedan
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the car is a sedan then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which establishes that the car is not a sedan.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the car is a sedan then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The car is not a sedan
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The car is not a sedan, since if the car is a sedan then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the car is a sedan then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The car is not a sedan
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The car is not a sedan, because if the car is a sedan then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the car is a sedan then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The car is not a sedan
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The car is not a sedan, as if the car is a sedan then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the car is a sedan then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The car is not a sedan
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the sun is setting slowly then the arson occurred on elm street, and the sun is setting slowly, therefore the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the sun is setting slowly then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The sun is setting slowly
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the sun is setting slowly then the arson occurred on elm street, and the sun is setting slowly, hence the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the sun is setting slowly then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The sun is setting slowly
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the sun is setting slowly then the arson occurred on elm street, and the sun is setting slowly, thus the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the sun is setting slowly then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The sun is setting slowly
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the sun is setting slowly then the arson occurred on elm street, and the sun is setting slowly, so it can be concluded that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the sun is setting slowly then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The sun is setting slowly
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the sun is setting slowly then the arson occurred on elm street, and the sun is setting slowly, so the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the sun is setting slowly then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The sun is setting slowly
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the sun is setting slowly then the arson occurred on elm street, and the sun is setting slowly, which implies that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the sun is setting slowly then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The sun is setting slowly
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the sun is setting slowly then the arson occurred on elm street, and the sun is setting slowly, which shows that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the sun is setting slowly then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The sun is setting slowly
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the sun is setting slowly then the arson occurred on elm street, and the sun is setting slowly, which establishes that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the sun is setting slowly then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The sun is setting slowly
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, since if the sun is setting slowly then the arson occurred on elm street and the sun is setting slowly.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the sun is setting slowly then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The sun is setting slowly
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, because if the sun is setting slowly then the arson occurred on elm street and the sun is setting slowly.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the sun is setting slowly then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The sun is setting slowly
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, as if the sun is setting slowly then the arson occurred on elm street and the sun is setting slowly.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the sun is setting slowly then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The sun is setting slowly
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the sun is setting slowly then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, therefore the sun is not setting slowly.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the sun is setting slowly then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The sun is not setting slowly
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the sun is setting slowly then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, hence the sun is not setting slowly.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the sun is setting slowly then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The sun is not setting slowly
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the sun is setting slowly then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, thus the sun is not setting slowly.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the sun is setting slowly then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The sun is not setting slowly
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the sun is setting slowly then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so it can be concluded that the sun is not setting slowly.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the sun is setting slowly then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The sun is not setting slowly
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the sun is setting slowly then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so the sun is not setting slowly.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the sun is setting slowly then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The sun is not setting slowly
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the sun is setting slowly then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which implies that the sun is not setting slowly.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the sun is setting slowly then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The sun is not setting slowly
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the sun is setting slowly then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which shows that the sun is not setting slowly.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the sun is setting slowly then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The sun is not setting slowly
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the sun is setting slowly then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which establishes that the sun is not setting slowly.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the sun is setting slowly then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The sun is not setting slowly
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The sun is not setting slowly, since if the sun is setting slowly then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the sun is setting slowly then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The sun is not setting slowly
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The sun is not setting slowly, because if the sun is setting slowly then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the sun is setting slowly then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The sun is not setting slowly
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The sun is not setting slowly, as if the sun is setting slowly then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the sun is setting slowly then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The sun is not setting slowly
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the cat is eating food then the arson occurred on elm street, and the cat is eating food, therefore the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the cat is eating food then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The cat is eating food
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the cat is eating food then the arson occurred on elm street, and the cat is eating food, hence the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the cat is eating food then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The cat is eating food
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the cat is eating food then the arson occurred on elm street, and the cat is eating food, thus the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the cat is eating food then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The cat is eating food
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the cat is eating food then the arson occurred on elm street, and the cat is eating food, so it can be concluded that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the cat is eating food then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The cat is eating food
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the cat is eating food then the arson occurred on elm street, and the cat is eating food, so the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the cat is eating food then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The cat is eating food
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the cat is eating food then the arson occurred on elm street, and the cat is eating food, which implies that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the cat is eating food then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The cat is eating food
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the cat is eating food then the arson occurred on elm street, and the cat is eating food, which shows that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the cat is eating food then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The cat is eating food
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the cat is eating food then the arson occurred on elm street, and the cat is eating food, which establishes that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the cat is eating food then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The cat is eating food
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, since if the cat is eating food then the arson occurred on elm street and the cat is eating food.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the cat is eating food then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The cat is eating food
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, because if the cat is eating food then the arson occurred on elm street and the cat is eating food.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the cat is eating food then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The cat is eating food
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, as if the cat is eating food then the arson occurred on elm street and the cat is eating food.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the cat is eating food then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The cat is eating food
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the cat is eating food then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, therefore the cat is not eating food.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the cat is eating food then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The cat is not eating food
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the cat is eating food then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, hence the cat is not eating food.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the cat is eating food then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The cat is not eating food
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the cat is eating food then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, thus the cat is not eating food.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the cat is eating food then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The cat is not eating food
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the cat is eating food then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so it can be concluded that the cat is not eating food.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the cat is eating food then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The cat is not eating food
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the cat is eating food then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so the cat is not eating food.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the cat is eating food then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The cat is not eating food
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the cat is eating food then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which implies that the cat is not eating food.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the cat is eating food then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The cat is not eating food
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the cat is eating food then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which shows that the cat is not eating food.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the cat is eating food then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The cat is not eating food
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the cat is eating food then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which establishes that the cat is not eating food.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the cat is eating food then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The cat is not eating food
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is not eating food, since if the cat is eating food then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the cat is eating food then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The cat is not eating food
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is not eating food, because if the cat is eating food then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the cat is eating food then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The cat is not eating food
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.