<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street, and officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene, therefore the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
stringlengths 355
1.02k
|
|---|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the baby is crying loudly then the arson occurred on elm street, and the baby is crying loudly, which establishes that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is crying loudly then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The baby is crying loudly
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, since if the baby is crying loudly then the arson occurred on elm street and the baby is crying loudly.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is crying loudly then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The baby is crying loudly
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, because if the baby is crying loudly then the arson occurred on elm street and the baby is crying loudly.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is crying loudly then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The baby is crying loudly
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, as if the baby is crying loudly then the arson occurred on elm street and the baby is crying loudly.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is crying loudly then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The baby is crying loudly
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the baby is crying loudly then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, therefore the baby is not crying loudly.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is crying loudly then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The baby is not crying loudly
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the baby is crying loudly then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, hence the baby is not crying loudly.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is crying loudly then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The baby is not crying loudly
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the baby is crying loudly then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, thus the baby is not crying loudly.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is crying loudly then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The baby is not crying loudly
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the baby is crying loudly then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so it can be concluded that the baby is not crying loudly.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is crying loudly then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The baby is not crying loudly
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the baby is crying loudly then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so the baby is not crying loudly.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is crying loudly then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The baby is not crying loudly
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the baby is crying loudly then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which implies that the baby is not crying loudly.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is crying loudly then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The baby is not crying loudly
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the baby is crying loudly then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which shows that the baby is not crying loudly.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is crying loudly then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The baby is not crying loudly
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the baby is crying loudly then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which establishes that the baby is not crying loudly.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is crying loudly then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The baby is not crying loudly
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The baby is not crying loudly, since if the baby is crying loudly then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is crying loudly then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The baby is not crying loudly
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The baby is not crying loudly, because if the baby is crying loudly then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is crying loudly then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The baby is not crying loudly
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The baby is not crying loudly, as if the baby is crying loudly then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is crying loudly then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The baby is not crying loudly
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the sun is shining brightly then the arson occurred on elm street, and the sun is shining brightly, therefore the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the sun is shining brightly then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The sun is shining brightly
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the sun is shining brightly then the arson occurred on elm street, and the sun is shining brightly, hence the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the sun is shining brightly then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The sun is shining brightly
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the sun is shining brightly then the arson occurred on elm street, and the sun is shining brightly, thus the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the sun is shining brightly then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The sun is shining brightly
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the sun is shining brightly then the arson occurred on elm street, and the sun is shining brightly, so it can be concluded that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the sun is shining brightly then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The sun is shining brightly
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the sun is shining brightly then the arson occurred on elm street, and the sun is shining brightly, so the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the sun is shining brightly then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The sun is shining brightly
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the sun is shining brightly then the arson occurred on elm street, and the sun is shining brightly, which implies that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the sun is shining brightly then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The sun is shining brightly
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the sun is shining brightly then the arson occurred on elm street, and the sun is shining brightly, which shows that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the sun is shining brightly then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The sun is shining brightly
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the sun is shining brightly then the arson occurred on elm street, and the sun is shining brightly, which establishes that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the sun is shining brightly then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The sun is shining brightly
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, since if the sun is shining brightly then the arson occurred on elm street and the sun is shining brightly.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the sun is shining brightly then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The sun is shining brightly
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, because if the sun is shining brightly then the arson occurred on elm street and the sun is shining brightly.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the sun is shining brightly then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The sun is shining brightly
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, as if the sun is shining brightly then the arson occurred on elm street and the sun is shining brightly.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the sun is shining brightly then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The sun is shining brightly
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the sun is shining brightly then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, therefore the sun is not shining brightly.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the sun is shining brightly then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The sun is not shining brightly
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the sun is shining brightly then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, hence the sun is not shining brightly.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the sun is shining brightly then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The sun is not shining brightly
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the sun is shining brightly then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, thus the sun is not shining brightly.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the sun is shining brightly then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The sun is not shining brightly
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the sun is shining brightly then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so it can be concluded that the sun is not shining brightly.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the sun is shining brightly then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The sun is not shining brightly
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the sun is shining brightly then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so the sun is not shining brightly.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the sun is shining brightly then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The sun is not shining brightly
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the sun is shining brightly then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which implies that the sun is not shining brightly.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the sun is shining brightly then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The sun is not shining brightly
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the sun is shining brightly then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which shows that the sun is not shining brightly.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the sun is shining brightly then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The sun is not shining brightly
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the sun is shining brightly then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which establishes that the sun is not shining brightly.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the sun is shining brightly then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The sun is not shining brightly
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The sun is not shining brightly, since if the sun is shining brightly then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the sun is shining brightly then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The sun is not shining brightly
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The sun is not shining brightly, because if the sun is shining brightly then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the sun is shining brightly then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The sun is not shining brightly
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The sun is not shining brightly, as if the sun is shining brightly then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the sun is shining brightly then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The sun is not shining brightly
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the tree is shedding leaves then the arson occurred on elm street, and the tree is shedding leaves, therefore the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the tree is shedding leaves then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The tree is shedding leaves
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the tree is shedding leaves then the arson occurred on elm street, and the tree is shedding leaves, hence the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the tree is shedding leaves then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The tree is shedding leaves
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the tree is shedding leaves then the arson occurred on elm street, and the tree is shedding leaves, thus the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the tree is shedding leaves then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The tree is shedding leaves
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the tree is shedding leaves then the arson occurred on elm street, and the tree is shedding leaves, so it can be concluded that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the tree is shedding leaves then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The tree is shedding leaves
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the tree is shedding leaves then the arson occurred on elm street, and the tree is shedding leaves, so the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the tree is shedding leaves then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The tree is shedding leaves
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the tree is shedding leaves then the arson occurred on elm street, and the tree is shedding leaves, which implies that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the tree is shedding leaves then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The tree is shedding leaves
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the tree is shedding leaves then the arson occurred on elm street, and the tree is shedding leaves, which shows that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the tree is shedding leaves then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The tree is shedding leaves
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the tree is shedding leaves then the arson occurred on elm street, and the tree is shedding leaves, which establishes that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the tree is shedding leaves then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The tree is shedding leaves
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, since if the tree is shedding leaves then the arson occurred on elm street and the tree is shedding leaves.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the tree is shedding leaves then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The tree is shedding leaves
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, because if the tree is shedding leaves then the arson occurred on elm street and the tree is shedding leaves.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the tree is shedding leaves then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The tree is shedding leaves
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, as if the tree is shedding leaves then the arson occurred on elm street and the tree is shedding leaves.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the tree is shedding leaves then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The tree is shedding leaves
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the tree is shedding leaves then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, therefore the tree is not shedding leaves.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the tree is shedding leaves then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The tree is not shedding leaves
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the tree is shedding leaves then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, hence the tree is not shedding leaves.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the tree is shedding leaves then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The tree is not shedding leaves
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the tree is shedding leaves then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, thus the tree is not shedding leaves.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the tree is shedding leaves then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The tree is not shedding leaves
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the tree is shedding leaves then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so it can be concluded that the tree is not shedding leaves.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the tree is shedding leaves then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The tree is not shedding leaves
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the tree is shedding leaves then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so the tree is not shedding leaves.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the tree is shedding leaves then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The tree is not shedding leaves
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the tree is shedding leaves then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which implies that the tree is not shedding leaves.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the tree is shedding leaves then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The tree is not shedding leaves
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the tree is shedding leaves then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which shows that the tree is not shedding leaves.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the tree is shedding leaves then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The tree is not shedding leaves
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the tree is shedding leaves then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which establishes that the tree is not shedding leaves.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the tree is shedding leaves then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The tree is not shedding leaves
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The tree is not shedding leaves, since if the tree is shedding leaves then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the tree is shedding leaves then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The tree is not shedding leaves
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The tree is not shedding leaves, because if the tree is shedding leaves then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the tree is shedding leaves then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The tree is not shedding leaves
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The tree is not shedding leaves, as if the tree is shedding leaves then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the tree is shedding leaves then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The tree is not shedding leaves
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the car is parked in the garage then the arson occurred on elm street, and the car is parked in the garage, therefore the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the car is parked in the garage then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The car is parked in the garage
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the car is parked in the garage then the arson occurred on elm street, and the car is parked in the garage, hence the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the car is parked in the garage then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The car is parked in the garage
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the car is parked in the garage then the arson occurred on elm street, and the car is parked in the garage, thus the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the car is parked in the garage then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The car is parked in the garage
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the car is parked in the garage then the arson occurred on elm street, and the car is parked in the garage, so it can be concluded that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the car is parked in the garage then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The car is parked in the garage
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the car is parked in the garage then the arson occurred on elm street, and the car is parked in the garage, so the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the car is parked in the garage then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The car is parked in the garage
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the car is parked in the garage then the arson occurred on elm street, and the car is parked in the garage, which implies that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the car is parked in the garage then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The car is parked in the garage
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the car is parked in the garage then the arson occurred on elm street, and the car is parked in the garage, which shows that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the car is parked in the garage then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The car is parked in the garage
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the car is parked in the garage then the arson occurred on elm street, and the car is parked in the garage, which establishes that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the car is parked in the garage then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The car is parked in the garage
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, since if the car is parked in the garage then the arson occurred on elm street and the car is parked in the garage.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the car is parked in the garage then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The car is parked in the garage
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, because if the car is parked in the garage then the arson occurred on elm street and the car is parked in the garage.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the car is parked in the garage then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The car is parked in the garage
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, as if the car is parked in the garage then the arson occurred on elm street and the car is parked in the garage.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the car is parked in the garage then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The car is parked in the garage
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the car is parked in the garage then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, therefore the car is not parked in the garage.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the car is parked in the garage then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The car is not parked in the garage
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the car is parked in the garage then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, hence the car is not parked in the garage.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the car is parked in the garage then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The car is not parked in the garage
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the car is parked in the garage then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, thus the car is not parked in the garage.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the car is parked in the garage then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The car is not parked in the garage
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the car is parked in the garage then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so it can be concluded that the car is not parked in the garage.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the car is parked in the garage then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The car is not parked in the garage
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the car is parked in the garage then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so the car is not parked in the garage.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the car is parked in the garage then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The car is not parked in the garage
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the car is parked in the garage then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which implies that the car is not parked in the garage.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the car is parked in the garage then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The car is not parked in the garage
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the car is parked in the garage then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which shows that the car is not parked in the garage.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the car is parked in the garage then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The car is not parked in the garage
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the car is parked in the garage then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which establishes that the car is not parked in the garage.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the car is parked in the garage then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The car is not parked in the garage
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The car is not parked in the garage, since if the car is parked in the garage then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the car is parked in the garage then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The car is not parked in the garage
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The car is not parked in the garage, because if the car is parked in the garage then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the car is parked in the garage then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The car is not parked in the garage
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The car is not parked in the garage, as if the car is parked in the garage then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the car is parked in the garage then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The car is not parked in the garage
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the baby is playing with toys then the arson occurred on elm street, and the baby is playing with toys, therefore the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is playing with toys then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The baby is playing with toys
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the baby is playing with toys then the arson occurred on elm street, and the baby is playing with toys, hence the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is playing with toys then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The baby is playing with toys
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the baby is playing with toys then the arson occurred on elm street, and the baby is playing with toys, thus the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is playing with toys then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The baby is playing with toys
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the baby is playing with toys then the arson occurred on elm street, and the baby is playing with toys, so it can be concluded that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is playing with toys then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The baby is playing with toys
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the baby is playing with toys then the arson occurred on elm street, and the baby is playing with toys, so the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is playing with toys then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The baby is playing with toys
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the baby is playing with toys then the arson occurred on elm street, and the baby is playing with toys, which implies that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is playing with toys then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The baby is playing with toys
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the baby is playing with toys then the arson occurred on elm street, and the baby is playing with toys, which shows that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is playing with toys then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The baby is playing with toys
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the baby is playing with toys then the arson occurred on elm street, and the baby is playing with toys, which establishes that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is playing with toys then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The baby is playing with toys
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, since if the baby is playing with toys then the arson occurred on elm street and the baby is playing with toys.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is playing with toys then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The baby is playing with toys
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, because if the baby is playing with toys then the arson occurred on elm street and the baby is playing with toys.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is playing with toys then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The baby is playing with toys
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, as if the baby is playing with toys then the arson occurred on elm street and the baby is playing with toys.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is playing with toys then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The baby is playing with toys
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the baby is playing with toys then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, therefore the baby is not playing with toys.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is playing with toys then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The baby is not playing with toys
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the baby is playing with toys then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, hence the baby is not playing with toys.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is playing with toys then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The baby is not playing with toys
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the baby is playing with toys then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, thus the baby is not playing with toys.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is playing with toys then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The baby is not playing with toys
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the baby is playing with toys then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so it can be concluded that the baby is not playing with toys.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is playing with toys then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The baby is not playing with toys
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the baby is playing with toys then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so the baby is not playing with toys.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is playing with toys then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The baby is not playing with toys
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the baby is playing with toys then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which implies that the baby is not playing with toys.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is playing with toys then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The baby is not playing with toys
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the baby is playing with toys then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which shows that the baby is not playing with toys.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is playing with toys then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The baby is not playing with toys
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the baby is playing with toys then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which establishes that the baby is not playing with toys.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is playing with toys then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The baby is not playing with toys
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.