<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street, and officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene, therefore the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
stringlengths 355
1.02k
|
|---|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the pizza is hot then the arson occurred on elm street, and the pizza is hot, which implies that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the pizza is hot then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The pizza is hot
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the pizza is hot then the arson occurred on elm street, and the pizza is hot, which shows that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the pizza is hot then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The pizza is hot
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the pizza is hot then the arson occurred on elm street, and the pizza is hot, which establishes that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the pizza is hot then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The pizza is hot
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, since if the pizza is hot then the arson occurred on elm street and the pizza is hot.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the pizza is hot then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The pizza is hot
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, because if the pizza is hot then the arson occurred on elm street and the pizza is hot.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the pizza is hot then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The pizza is hot
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, as if the pizza is hot then the arson occurred on elm street and the pizza is hot.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the pizza is hot then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The pizza is hot
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the pizza is hot then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, therefore the pizza is not hot.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the pizza is hot then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The pizza is not hot
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the pizza is hot then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, hence the pizza is not hot.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the pizza is hot then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The pizza is not hot
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the pizza is hot then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, thus the pizza is not hot.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the pizza is hot then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The pizza is not hot
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the pizza is hot then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so it can be concluded that the pizza is not hot.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the pizza is hot then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The pizza is not hot
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the pizza is hot then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so the pizza is not hot.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the pizza is hot then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The pizza is not hot
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the pizza is hot then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which implies that the pizza is not hot.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the pizza is hot then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The pizza is not hot
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the pizza is hot then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which shows that the pizza is not hot.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the pizza is hot then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The pizza is not hot
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the pizza is hot then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which establishes that the pizza is not hot.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the pizza is hot then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The pizza is not hot
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The pizza is not hot, since if the pizza is hot then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the pizza is hot then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The pizza is not hot
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The pizza is not hot, because if the pizza is hot then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the pizza is hot then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The pizza is not hot
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The pizza is not hot, as if the pizza is hot then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the pizza is hot then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The pizza is not hot
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the computer is on then the arson occurred on elm street, and the computer is on, therefore the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the computer is on then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The computer is on
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the computer is on then the arson occurred on elm street, and the computer is on, hence the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the computer is on then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The computer is on
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the computer is on then the arson occurred on elm street, and the computer is on, thus the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the computer is on then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The computer is on
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the computer is on then the arson occurred on elm street, and the computer is on, so it can be concluded that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the computer is on then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The computer is on
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the computer is on then the arson occurred on elm street, and the computer is on, so the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the computer is on then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The computer is on
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the computer is on then the arson occurred on elm street, and the computer is on, which implies that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the computer is on then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The computer is on
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the computer is on then the arson occurred on elm street, and the computer is on, which shows that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the computer is on then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The computer is on
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the computer is on then the arson occurred on elm street, and the computer is on, which establishes that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the computer is on then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The computer is on
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, since if the computer is on then the arson occurred on elm street and the computer is on.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the computer is on then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The computer is on
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, because if the computer is on then the arson occurred on elm street and the computer is on.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the computer is on then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The computer is on
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, as if the computer is on then the arson occurred on elm street and the computer is on.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the computer is on then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The computer is on
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the computer is on then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, therefore the computer is not on.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the computer is on then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The computer is not on
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the computer is on then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, hence the computer is not on.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the computer is on then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The computer is not on
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the computer is on then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, thus the computer is not on.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the computer is on then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The computer is not on
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the computer is on then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so it can be concluded that the computer is not on.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the computer is on then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The computer is not on
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the computer is on then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so the computer is not on.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the computer is on then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The computer is not on
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the computer is on then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which implies that the computer is not on.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the computer is on then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The computer is not on
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the computer is on then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which shows that the computer is not on.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the computer is on then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The computer is not on
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the computer is on then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which establishes that the computer is not on.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the computer is on then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The computer is not on
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The computer is not on, since if the computer is on then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the computer is on then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The computer is not on
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The computer is not on, because if the computer is on then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the computer is on then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The computer is not on
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The computer is not on, as if the computer is on then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the computer is on then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The computer is not on
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the phone is ringing then the arson occurred on elm street, and the phone is ringing, therefore the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the phone is ringing then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The phone is ringing
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the phone is ringing then the arson occurred on elm street, and the phone is ringing, hence the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the phone is ringing then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The phone is ringing
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the phone is ringing then the arson occurred on elm street, and the phone is ringing, thus the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the phone is ringing then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The phone is ringing
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the phone is ringing then the arson occurred on elm street, and the phone is ringing, so it can be concluded that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the phone is ringing then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The phone is ringing
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the phone is ringing then the arson occurred on elm street, and the phone is ringing, so the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the phone is ringing then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The phone is ringing
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the phone is ringing then the arson occurred on elm street, and the phone is ringing, which implies that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the phone is ringing then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The phone is ringing
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the phone is ringing then the arson occurred on elm street, and the phone is ringing, which shows that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the phone is ringing then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The phone is ringing
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the phone is ringing then the arson occurred on elm street, and the phone is ringing, which establishes that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the phone is ringing then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The phone is ringing
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, since if the phone is ringing then the arson occurred on elm street and the phone is ringing.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the phone is ringing then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The phone is ringing
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, because if the phone is ringing then the arson occurred on elm street and the phone is ringing.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the phone is ringing then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The phone is ringing
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, as if the phone is ringing then the arson occurred on elm street and the phone is ringing.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the phone is ringing then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The phone is ringing
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the phone is ringing then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, therefore the phone is not ringing.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the phone is ringing then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The phone is not ringing
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the phone is ringing then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, hence the phone is not ringing.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the phone is ringing then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The phone is not ringing
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the phone is ringing then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, thus the phone is not ringing.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the phone is ringing then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The phone is not ringing
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the phone is ringing then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so it can be concluded that the phone is not ringing.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the phone is ringing then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The phone is not ringing
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the phone is ringing then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so the phone is not ringing.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the phone is ringing then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The phone is not ringing
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the phone is ringing then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which implies that the phone is not ringing.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the phone is ringing then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The phone is not ringing
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the phone is ringing then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which shows that the phone is not ringing.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the phone is ringing then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The phone is not ringing
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the phone is ringing then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which establishes that the phone is not ringing.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the phone is ringing then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The phone is not ringing
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The phone is not ringing, since if the phone is ringing then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the phone is ringing then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The phone is not ringing
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The phone is not ringing, because if the phone is ringing then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the phone is ringing then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The phone is not ringing
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The phone is not ringing, as if the phone is ringing then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the phone is ringing then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The phone is not ringing
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the book is interesting then the arson occurred on elm street, and the book is interesting, therefore the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the book is interesting then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The book is interesting
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the book is interesting then the arson occurred on elm street, and the book is interesting, hence the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the book is interesting then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The book is interesting
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the book is interesting then the arson occurred on elm street, and the book is interesting, thus the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the book is interesting then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The book is interesting
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the book is interesting then the arson occurred on elm street, and the book is interesting, so it can be concluded that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the book is interesting then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The book is interesting
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the book is interesting then the arson occurred on elm street, and the book is interesting, so the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the book is interesting then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The book is interesting
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the book is interesting then the arson occurred on elm street, and the book is interesting, which implies that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the book is interesting then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The book is interesting
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the book is interesting then the arson occurred on elm street, and the book is interesting, which shows that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the book is interesting then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The book is interesting
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the book is interesting then the arson occurred on elm street, and the book is interesting, which establishes that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the book is interesting then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The book is interesting
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, since if the book is interesting then the arson occurred on elm street and the book is interesting.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the book is interesting then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The book is interesting
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, because if the book is interesting then the arson occurred on elm street and the book is interesting.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the book is interesting then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The book is interesting
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, as if the book is interesting then the arson occurred on elm street and the book is interesting.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the book is interesting then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The book is interesting
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the book is interesting then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, therefore the book is not interesting.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the book is interesting then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The book is not interesting
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the book is interesting then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, hence the book is not interesting.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the book is interesting then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The book is not interesting
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the book is interesting then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, thus the book is not interesting.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the book is interesting then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The book is not interesting
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the book is interesting then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so it can be concluded that the book is not interesting.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the book is interesting then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The book is not interesting
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the book is interesting then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so the book is not interesting.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the book is interesting then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The book is not interesting
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the book is interesting then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which implies that the book is not interesting.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the book is interesting then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The book is not interesting
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the book is interesting then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which shows that the book is not interesting.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the book is interesting then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The book is not interesting
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the book is interesting then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which establishes that the book is not interesting.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the book is interesting then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The book is not interesting
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The book is not interesting, since if the book is interesting then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the book is interesting then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The book is not interesting
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The book is not interesting, because if the book is interesting then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the book is interesting then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The book is not interesting
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The book is not interesting, as if the book is interesting then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the book is interesting then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The book is not interesting
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the movie is exciting then the arson occurred on elm street, and the movie is exciting, therefore the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the movie is exciting then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The movie is exciting
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the movie is exciting then the arson occurred on elm street, and the movie is exciting, hence the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the movie is exciting then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The movie is exciting
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the movie is exciting then the arson occurred on elm street, and the movie is exciting, thus the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the movie is exciting then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The movie is exciting
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the movie is exciting then the arson occurred on elm street, and the movie is exciting, so it can be concluded that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the movie is exciting then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The movie is exciting
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the movie is exciting then the arson occurred on elm street, and the movie is exciting, so the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the movie is exciting then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The movie is exciting
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the movie is exciting then the arson occurred on elm street, and the movie is exciting, which implies that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the movie is exciting then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The movie is exciting
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the movie is exciting then the arson occurred on elm street, and the movie is exciting, which shows that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the movie is exciting then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The movie is exciting
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the movie is exciting then the arson occurred on elm street, and the movie is exciting, which establishes that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the movie is exciting then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The movie is exciting
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, since if the movie is exciting then the arson occurred on elm street and the movie is exciting.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the movie is exciting then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The movie is exciting
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, because if the movie is exciting then the arson occurred on elm street and the movie is exciting.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the movie is exciting then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The movie is exciting
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, as if the movie is exciting then the arson occurred on elm street and the movie is exciting.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the movie is exciting then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The movie is exciting
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the movie is exciting then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, therefore the movie is not exciting.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the movie is exciting then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The movie is not exciting
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the movie is exciting then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, hence the movie is not exciting.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the movie is exciting then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The movie is not exciting
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the movie is exciting then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, thus the movie is not exciting.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the movie is exciting then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The movie is not exciting
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the movie is exciting then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so it can be concluded that the movie is not exciting.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the movie is exciting then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The movie is not exciting
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the movie is exciting then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so the movie is not exciting.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the movie is exciting then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The movie is not exciting
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the movie is exciting then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which implies that the movie is not exciting.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the movie is exciting then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The movie is not exciting
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.