<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street, and officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene, therefore the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
stringlengths 355
1.02k
|
|---|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the sun is setting then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so the sun is not setting.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the sun is setting then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The sun is not setting
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the sun is setting then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which implies that the sun is not setting.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the sun is setting then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The sun is not setting
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the sun is setting then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which shows that the sun is not setting.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the sun is setting then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The sun is not setting
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the sun is setting then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which establishes that the sun is not setting.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the sun is setting then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The sun is not setting
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The sun is not setting, since if the sun is setting then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the sun is setting then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The sun is not setting
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The sun is not setting, because if the sun is setting then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the sun is setting then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The sun is not setting
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The sun is not setting, as if the sun is setting then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the sun is setting then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The sun is not setting
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the baby is sleeping then the arson occurred on elm street, and the baby is sleeping, therefore the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is sleeping then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The baby is sleeping
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the baby is sleeping then the arson occurred on elm street, and the baby is sleeping, hence the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is sleeping then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The baby is sleeping
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the baby is sleeping then the arson occurred on elm street, and the baby is sleeping, thus the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is sleeping then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The baby is sleeping
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the baby is sleeping then the arson occurred on elm street, and the baby is sleeping, so it can be concluded that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is sleeping then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The baby is sleeping
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the baby is sleeping then the arson occurred on elm street, and the baby is sleeping, so the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is sleeping then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The baby is sleeping
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the baby is sleeping then the arson occurred on elm street, and the baby is sleeping, which implies that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is sleeping then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The baby is sleeping
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the baby is sleeping then the arson occurred on elm street, and the baby is sleeping, which shows that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is sleeping then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The baby is sleeping
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the baby is sleeping then the arson occurred on elm street, and the baby is sleeping, which establishes that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is sleeping then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The baby is sleeping
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, since if the baby is sleeping then the arson occurred on elm street and the baby is sleeping.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is sleeping then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The baby is sleeping
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, because if the baby is sleeping then the arson occurred on elm street and the baby is sleeping.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is sleeping then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The baby is sleeping
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, as if the baby is sleeping then the arson occurred on elm street and the baby is sleeping.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is sleeping then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The baby is sleeping
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the baby is sleeping then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, therefore the baby is not sleeping.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is sleeping then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The baby is not sleeping
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the baby is sleeping then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, hence the baby is not sleeping.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is sleeping then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The baby is not sleeping
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the baby is sleeping then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, thus the baby is not sleeping.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is sleeping then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The baby is not sleeping
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the baby is sleeping then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so it can be concluded that the baby is not sleeping.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is sleeping then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The baby is not sleeping
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the baby is sleeping then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so the baby is not sleeping.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is sleeping then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The baby is not sleeping
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the baby is sleeping then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which implies that the baby is not sleeping.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is sleeping then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The baby is not sleeping
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the baby is sleeping then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which shows that the baby is not sleeping.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is sleeping then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The baby is not sleeping
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the baby is sleeping then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which establishes that the baby is not sleeping.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is sleeping then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The baby is not sleeping
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The baby is not sleeping, since if the baby is sleeping then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is sleeping then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The baby is not sleeping
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The baby is not sleeping, because if the baby is sleeping then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is sleeping then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The baby is not sleeping
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The baby is not sleeping, as if the baby is sleeping then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is sleeping then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The baby is not sleeping
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the car is moving then the arson occurred on elm street, and the car is moving, therefore the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the car is moving then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The car is moving
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the car is moving then the arson occurred on elm street, and the car is moving, hence the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the car is moving then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The car is moving
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the car is moving then the arson occurred on elm street, and the car is moving, thus the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the car is moving then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The car is moving
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the car is moving then the arson occurred on elm street, and the car is moving, so it can be concluded that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the car is moving then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The car is moving
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the car is moving then the arson occurred on elm street, and the car is moving, so the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the car is moving then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The car is moving
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the car is moving then the arson occurred on elm street, and the car is moving, which implies that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the car is moving then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The car is moving
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the car is moving then the arson occurred on elm street, and the car is moving, which shows that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the car is moving then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The car is moving
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the car is moving then the arson occurred on elm street, and the car is moving, which establishes that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the car is moving then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The car is moving
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, since if the car is moving then the arson occurred on elm street and the car is moving.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the car is moving then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The car is moving
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, because if the car is moving then the arson occurred on elm street and the car is moving.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the car is moving then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The car is moving
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, as if the car is moving then the arson occurred on elm street and the car is moving.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the car is moving then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The car is moving
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the car is moving then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, therefore the car is not moving.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the car is moving then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The car is not moving
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the car is moving then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, hence the car is not moving.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the car is moving then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The car is not moving
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the car is moving then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, thus the car is not moving.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the car is moving then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The car is not moving
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the car is moving then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so it can be concluded that the car is not moving.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the car is moving then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The car is not moving
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the car is moving then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so the car is not moving.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the car is moving then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The car is not moving
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the car is moving then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which implies that the car is not moving.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the car is moving then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The car is not moving
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the car is moving then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which shows that the car is not moving.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the car is moving then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The car is not moving
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the car is moving then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which establishes that the car is not moving.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the car is moving then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The car is not moving
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The car is not moving, since if the car is moving then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the car is moving then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The car is not moving
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The car is not moving, because if the car is moving then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the car is moving then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The car is not moving
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The car is not moving, as if the car is moving then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the car is moving then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The car is not moving
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the bird is singing then the arson occurred on elm street, and the bird is singing, therefore the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the bird is singing then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The bird is singing
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the bird is singing then the arson occurred on elm street, and the bird is singing, hence the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the bird is singing then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The bird is singing
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the bird is singing then the arson occurred on elm street, and the bird is singing, thus the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the bird is singing then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The bird is singing
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the bird is singing then the arson occurred on elm street, and the bird is singing, so it can be concluded that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the bird is singing then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The bird is singing
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the bird is singing then the arson occurred on elm street, and the bird is singing, so the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the bird is singing then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The bird is singing
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the bird is singing then the arson occurred on elm street, and the bird is singing, which implies that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the bird is singing then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The bird is singing
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the bird is singing then the arson occurred on elm street, and the bird is singing, which shows that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the bird is singing then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The bird is singing
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the bird is singing then the arson occurred on elm street, and the bird is singing, which establishes that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the bird is singing then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The bird is singing
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, since if the bird is singing then the arson occurred on elm street and the bird is singing.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the bird is singing then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The bird is singing
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, because if the bird is singing then the arson occurred on elm street and the bird is singing.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the bird is singing then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The bird is singing
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, as if the bird is singing then the arson occurred on elm street and the bird is singing.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the bird is singing then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The bird is singing
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the bird is singing then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, therefore the bird is not singing.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the bird is singing then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The bird is not singing
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the bird is singing then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, hence the bird is not singing.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the bird is singing then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The bird is not singing
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the bird is singing then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, thus the bird is not singing.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the bird is singing then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The bird is not singing
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the bird is singing then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so it can be concluded that the bird is not singing.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the bird is singing then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The bird is not singing
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the bird is singing then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so the bird is not singing.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the bird is singing then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The bird is not singing
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the bird is singing then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which implies that the bird is not singing.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the bird is singing then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The bird is not singing
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the bird is singing then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which shows that the bird is not singing.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the bird is singing then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The bird is not singing
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the bird is singing then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which establishes that the bird is not singing.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the bird is singing then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The bird is not singing
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The bird is not singing, since if the bird is singing then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the bird is singing then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The bird is not singing
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The bird is not singing, because if the bird is singing then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the bird is singing then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The bird is not singing
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The bird is not singing, as if the bird is singing then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the bird is singing then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The bird is not singing
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the water is warm then the arson occurred on elm street, and the water is warm, therefore the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the water is warm then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The water is warm
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the water is warm then the arson occurred on elm street, and the water is warm, hence the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the water is warm then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The water is warm
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the water is warm then the arson occurred on elm street, and the water is warm, thus the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the water is warm then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The water is warm
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the water is warm then the arson occurred on elm street, and the water is warm, so it can be concluded that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the water is warm then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The water is warm
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the water is warm then the arson occurred on elm street, and the water is warm, so the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the water is warm then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The water is warm
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the water is warm then the arson occurred on elm street, and the water is warm, which implies that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the water is warm then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The water is warm
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the water is warm then the arson occurred on elm street, and the water is warm, which shows that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the water is warm then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The water is warm
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the water is warm then the arson occurred on elm street, and the water is warm, which establishes that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the water is warm then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The water is warm
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, since if the water is warm then the arson occurred on elm street and the water is warm.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the water is warm then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The water is warm
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, because if the water is warm then the arson occurred on elm street and the water is warm.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the water is warm then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The water is warm
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, as if the water is warm then the arson occurred on elm street and the water is warm.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the water is warm then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The water is warm
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the water is warm then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, therefore the water is not warm.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the water is warm then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The water is not warm
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the water is warm then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, hence the water is not warm.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the water is warm then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The water is not warm
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the water is warm then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, thus the water is not warm.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the water is warm then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The water is not warm
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the water is warm then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so it can be concluded that the water is not warm.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the water is warm then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The water is not warm
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the water is warm then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so the water is not warm.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the water is warm then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The water is not warm
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the water is warm then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which implies that the water is not warm.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the water is warm then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The water is not warm
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the water is warm then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which shows that the water is not warm.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the water is warm then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The water is not warm
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the water is warm then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which establishes that the water is not warm.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the water is warm then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The water is not warm
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The water is not warm, since if the water is warm then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the water is warm then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The water is not warm
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The water is not warm, because if the water is warm then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the water is warm then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The water is not warm
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The water is not warm, as if the water is warm then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the water is warm then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The water is not warm
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the pizza is hot then the arson occurred on elm street, and the pizza is hot, therefore the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the pizza is hot then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The pizza is hot
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the pizza is hot then the arson occurred on elm street, and the pizza is hot, hence the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the pizza is hot then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The pizza is hot
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the pizza is hot then the arson occurred on elm street, and the pizza is hot, thus the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the pizza is hot then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The pizza is hot
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the pizza is hot then the arson occurred on elm street, and the pizza is hot, so it can be concluded that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the pizza is hot then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The pizza is hot
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the pizza is hot then the arson occurred on elm street, and the pizza is hot, so the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the pizza is hot then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The pizza is hot
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.