<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street, and officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene, therefore the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
stringlengths 355
1.02k
|
|---|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If sally is older than john then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, thus sally is not older than john.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If sally is older than john then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Sally is not older than John
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If sally is older than john then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so it can be concluded that sally is not older than john.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If sally is older than john then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Sally is not older than John
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If sally is older than john then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so sally is not older than john.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If sally is older than john then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Sally is not older than John
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If sally is older than john then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which implies that sally is not older than john.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If sally is older than john then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Sally is not older than John
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If sally is older than john then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which shows that sally is not older than john.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If sally is older than john then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Sally is not older than John
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If sally is older than john then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which establishes that sally is not older than john.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If sally is older than john then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Sally is not older than John
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```Sally is not older than john, since if sally is older than john then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If sally is older than john then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Sally is not older than John
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```Sally is not older than john, because if sally is older than john then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If sally is older than john then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Sally is not older than John
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```Sally is not older than john, as if sally is older than john then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If sally is older than john then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Sally is not older than John
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the book is on the table then the arson occurred on elm street, and the book is on the table, therefore the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the book is on the table then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The book is on the table
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the book is on the table then the arson occurred on elm street, and the book is on the table, hence the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the book is on the table then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The book is on the table
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the book is on the table then the arson occurred on elm street, and the book is on the table, thus the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the book is on the table then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The book is on the table
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the book is on the table then the arson occurred on elm street, and the book is on the table, so it can be concluded that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the book is on the table then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The book is on the table
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the book is on the table then the arson occurred on elm street, and the book is on the table, so the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the book is on the table then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The book is on the table
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the book is on the table then the arson occurred on elm street, and the book is on the table, which implies that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the book is on the table then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The book is on the table
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the book is on the table then the arson occurred on elm street, and the book is on the table, which shows that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the book is on the table then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The book is on the table
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the book is on the table then the arson occurred on elm street, and the book is on the table, which establishes that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the book is on the table then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The book is on the table
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, since if the book is on the table then the arson occurred on elm street and the book is on the table.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the book is on the table then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The book is on the table
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, because if the book is on the table then the arson occurred on elm street and the book is on the table.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the book is on the table then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The book is on the table
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, as if the book is on the table then the arson occurred on elm street and the book is on the table.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the book is on the table then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The book is on the table
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the book is on the table then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, therefore the book is not on the table.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the book is on the table then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The book is not on the table
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the book is on the table then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, hence the book is not on the table.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the book is on the table then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The book is not on the table
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the book is on the table then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, thus the book is not on the table.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the book is on the table then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The book is not on the table
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the book is on the table then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so it can be concluded that the book is not on the table.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the book is on the table then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The book is not on the table
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the book is on the table then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so the book is not on the table.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the book is on the table then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The book is not on the table
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the book is on the table then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which implies that the book is not on the table.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the book is on the table then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The book is not on the table
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the book is on the table then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which shows that the book is not on the table.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the book is on the table then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The book is not on the table
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the book is on the table then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which establishes that the book is not on the table.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the book is on the table then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The book is not on the table
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The book is not on the table, since if the book is on the table then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the book is on the table then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The book is not on the table
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The book is not on the table, because if the book is on the table then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the book is on the table then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The book is not on the table
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The book is not on the table, as if the book is on the table then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the book is on the table then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The book is not on the table
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the car is parked on the street then the arson occurred on elm street, and the car is parked on the street, therefore the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the car is parked on the street then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The car is parked on the street
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the car is parked on the street then the arson occurred on elm street, and the car is parked on the street, hence the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the car is parked on the street then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The car is parked on the street
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the car is parked on the street then the arson occurred on elm street, and the car is parked on the street, thus the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the car is parked on the street then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The car is parked on the street
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the car is parked on the street then the arson occurred on elm street, and the car is parked on the street, so it can be concluded that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the car is parked on the street then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The car is parked on the street
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the car is parked on the street then the arson occurred on elm street, and the car is parked on the street, so the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the car is parked on the street then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The car is parked on the street
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the car is parked on the street then the arson occurred on elm street, and the car is parked on the street, which implies that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the car is parked on the street then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The car is parked on the street
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the car is parked on the street then the arson occurred on elm street, and the car is parked on the street, which shows that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the car is parked on the street then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The car is parked on the street
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the car is parked on the street then the arson occurred on elm street, and the car is parked on the street, which establishes that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the car is parked on the street then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The car is parked on the street
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, since if the car is parked on the street then the arson occurred on elm street and the car is parked on the street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the car is parked on the street then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The car is parked on the street
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, because if the car is parked on the street then the arson occurred on elm street and the car is parked on the street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the car is parked on the street then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The car is parked on the street
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, as if the car is parked on the street then the arson occurred on elm street and the car is parked on the street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the car is parked on the street then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The car is parked on the street
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the car is parked on the street then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, therefore the car is not parked on the street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the car is parked on the street then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The car is not parked on the street
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the car is parked on the street then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, hence the car is not parked on the street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the car is parked on the street then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The car is not parked on the street
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the car is parked on the street then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, thus the car is not parked on the street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the car is parked on the street then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The car is not parked on the street
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the car is parked on the street then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so it can be concluded that the car is not parked on the street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the car is parked on the street then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The car is not parked on the street
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the car is parked on the street then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so the car is not parked on the street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the car is parked on the street then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The car is not parked on the street
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the car is parked on the street then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which implies that the car is not parked on the street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the car is parked on the street then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The car is not parked on the street
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the car is parked on the street then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which shows that the car is not parked on the street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the car is parked on the street then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The car is not parked on the street
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the car is parked on the street then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which establishes that the car is not parked on the street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the car is parked on the street then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The car is not parked on the street
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The car is not parked on the street, since if the car is parked on the street then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the car is parked on the street then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The car is not parked on the street
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The car is not parked on the street, because if the car is parked on the street then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the car is parked on the street then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The car is not parked on the street
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The car is not parked on the street, as if the car is parked on the street then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the car is parked on the street then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The car is not parked on the street
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the baby is crying then the arson occurred on elm street, and the baby is crying, therefore the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is crying then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The baby is crying
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the baby is crying then the arson occurred on elm street, and the baby is crying, hence the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is crying then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The baby is crying
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the baby is crying then the arson occurred on elm street, and the baby is crying, thus the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is crying then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The baby is crying
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the baby is crying then the arson occurred on elm street, and the baby is crying, so it can be concluded that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is crying then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The baby is crying
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the baby is crying then the arson occurred on elm street, and the baby is crying, so the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is crying then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The baby is crying
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the baby is crying then the arson occurred on elm street, and the baby is crying, which implies that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is crying then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The baby is crying
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the baby is crying then the arson occurred on elm street, and the baby is crying, which shows that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is crying then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The baby is crying
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the baby is crying then the arson occurred on elm street, and the baby is crying, which establishes that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is crying then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The baby is crying
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, since if the baby is crying then the arson occurred on elm street and the baby is crying.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is crying then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The baby is crying
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, because if the baby is crying then the arson occurred on elm street and the baby is crying.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is crying then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The baby is crying
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, as if the baby is crying then the arson occurred on elm street and the baby is crying.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is crying then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The baby is crying
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the baby is crying then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, therefore the baby is not crying.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is crying then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The baby is not crying
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the baby is crying then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, hence the baby is not crying.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is crying then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The baby is not crying
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the baby is crying then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, thus the baby is not crying.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is crying then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The baby is not crying
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the baby is crying then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so it can be concluded that the baby is not crying.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is crying then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The baby is not crying
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the baby is crying then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so the baby is not crying.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is crying then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The baby is not crying
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the baby is crying then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which implies that the baby is not crying.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is crying then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The baby is not crying
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the baby is crying then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which shows that the baby is not crying.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is crying then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The baby is not crying
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the baby is crying then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which establishes that the baby is not crying.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is crying then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The baby is not crying
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The baby is not crying, since if the baby is crying then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is crying then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The baby is not crying
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The baby is not crying, because if the baby is crying then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is crying then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The baby is not crying
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The baby is not crying, as if the baby is crying then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is crying then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The baby is not crying
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the football is round then the arson occurred on elm street, and the football is round, therefore the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the football is round then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The football is round
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the football is round then the arson occurred on elm street, and the football is round, hence the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the football is round then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The football is round
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the football is round then the arson occurred on elm street, and the football is round, thus the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the football is round then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The football is round
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the football is round then the arson occurred on elm street, and the football is round, so it can be concluded that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the football is round then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The football is round
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the football is round then the arson occurred on elm street, and the football is round, so the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the football is round then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The football is round
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the football is round then the arson occurred on elm street, and the football is round, which implies that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the football is round then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The football is round
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the football is round then the arson occurred on elm street, and the football is round, which shows that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the football is round then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The football is round
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the football is round then the arson occurred on elm street, and the football is round, which establishes that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the football is round then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The football is round
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, since if the football is round then the arson occurred on elm street and the football is round.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the football is round then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The football is round
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, because if the football is round then the arson occurred on elm street and the football is round.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the football is round then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The football is round
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, as if the football is round then the arson occurred on elm street and the football is round.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the football is round then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The football is round
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the football is round then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, therefore the football is not round.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the football is round then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The football is not round
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the football is round then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, hence the football is not round.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the football is round then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The football is not round
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the football is round then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, thus the football is not round.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the football is round then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The football is not round
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the football is round then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so it can be concluded that the football is not round.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the football is round then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The football is not round
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the football is round then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so the football is not round.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the football is round then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The football is not round
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the football is round then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which implies that the football is not round.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the football is round then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The football is not round
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the football is round then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which shows that the football is not round.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the football is round then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The football is not round
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the football is round then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which establishes that the football is not round.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the football is round then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The football is not round
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The football is not round, since if the football is round then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the football is round then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The football is not round
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The football is not round, because if the football is round then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the football is round then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The football is not round
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The football is not round, as if the football is round then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the football is round then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The football is not round
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the apple is red then the arson occurred on elm street, and the apple is red, therefore the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the apple is red then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The apple is red
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the apple is red then the arson occurred on elm street, and the apple is red, hence the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the apple is red then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The apple is red
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the apple is red then the arson occurred on elm street, and the apple is red, thus the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the apple is red then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The apple is red
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.