<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street, and officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene, therefore the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
stringlengths 355
1.02k
|
|---|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If emily's fingerprints were found on the stolen jewels recovered from the pawn shop then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, therefore emily's fingerprints were not found on the stolen jewels recovered from the pawn shop.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If emily's fingerprints were found on the stolen jewels recovered from the pawn shop then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Emily's fingerprints were not found on the stolen jewels recovered from the pawn shop
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If emily's fingerprints were found on the stolen jewels recovered from the pawn shop then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, hence emily's fingerprints were not found on the stolen jewels recovered from the pawn shop.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If emily's fingerprints were found on the stolen jewels recovered from the pawn shop then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Emily's fingerprints were not found on the stolen jewels recovered from the pawn shop
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If emily's fingerprints were found on the stolen jewels recovered from the pawn shop then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, thus emily's fingerprints were not found on the stolen jewels recovered from the pawn shop.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If emily's fingerprints were found on the stolen jewels recovered from the pawn shop then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Emily's fingerprints were not found on the stolen jewels recovered from the pawn shop
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If emily's fingerprints were found on the stolen jewels recovered from the pawn shop then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so it can be concluded that emily's fingerprints were not found on the stolen jewels recovered from the pawn shop.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If emily's fingerprints were found on the stolen jewels recovered from the pawn shop then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Emily's fingerprints were not found on the stolen jewels recovered from the pawn shop
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If emily's fingerprints were found on the stolen jewels recovered from the pawn shop then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so emily's fingerprints were not found on the stolen jewels recovered from the pawn shop.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If emily's fingerprints were found on the stolen jewels recovered from the pawn shop then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Emily's fingerprints were not found on the stolen jewels recovered from the pawn shop
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If emily's fingerprints were found on the stolen jewels recovered from the pawn shop then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which implies that emily's fingerprints were not found on the stolen jewels recovered from the pawn shop.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If emily's fingerprints were found on the stolen jewels recovered from the pawn shop then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Emily's fingerprints were not found on the stolen jewels recovered from the pawn shop
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If emily's fingerprints were found on the stolen jewels recovered from the pawn shop then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which shows that emily's fingerprints were not found on the stolen jewels recovered from the pawn shop.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If emily's fingerprints were found on the stolen jewels recovered from the pawn shop then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Emily's fingerprints were not found on the stolen jewels recovered from the pawn shop
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If emily's fingerprints were found on the stolen jewels recovered from the pawn shop then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which establishes that emily's fingerprints were not found on the stolen jewels recovered from the pawn shop.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If emily's fingerprints were found on the stolen jewels recovered from the pawn shop then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Emily's fingerprints were not found on the stolen jewels recovered from the pawn shop
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```Emily's fingerprints were not found on the stolen jewels recovered from the pawn shop, since if emily's fingerprints were found on the stolen jewels recovered from the pawn shop then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If emily's fingerprints were found on the stolen jewels recovered from the pawn shop then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Emily's fingerprints were not found on the stolen jewels recovered from the pawn shop
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```Emily's fingerprints were not found on the stolen jewels recovered from the pawn shop, because if emily's fingerprints were found on the stolen jewels recovered from the pawn shop then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If emily's fingerprints were found on the stolen jewels recovered from the pawn shop then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Emily's fingerprints were not found on the stolen jewels recovered from the pawn shop
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```Emily's fingerprints were not found on the stolen jewels recovered from the pawn shop, as if emily's fingerprints were found on the stolen jewels recovered from the pawn shop then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If emily's fingerprints were found on the stolen jewels recovered from the pawn shop then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Emily's fingerprints were not found on the stolen jewels recovered from the pawn shop
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If it is raining today then the arson occurred on elm street, and it is raining today, therefore the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If it is raining today then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: It is raining today
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If it is raining today then the arson occurred on elm street, and it is raining today, hence the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If it is raining today then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: It is raining today
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If it is raining today then the arson occurred on elm street, and it is raining today, thus the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If it is raining today then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: It is raining today
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If it is raining today then the arson occurred on elm street, and it is raining today, so it can be concluded that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If it is raining today then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: It is raining today
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If it is raining today then the arson occurred on elm street, and it is raining today, so the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If it is raining today then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: It is raining today
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If it is raining today then the arson occurred on elm street, and it is raining today, which implies that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If it is raining today then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: It is raining today
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If it is raining today then the arson occurred on elm street, and it is raining today, which shows that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If it is raining today then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: It is raining today
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If it is raining today then the arson occurred on elm street, and it is raining today, which establishes that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If it is raining today then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: It is raining today
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, since if it is raining today then the arson occurred on elm street and it is raining today.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If it is raining today then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: It is raining today
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, because if it is raining today then the arson occurred on elm street and it is raining today.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If it is raining today then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: It is raining today
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, as if it is raining today then the arson occurred on elm street and it is raining today.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If it is raining today then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: It is raining today
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If it is raining today then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, therefore it is not raining today.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If it is raining today then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: It is not raining today
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If it is raining today then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, hence it is not raining today.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If it is raining today then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: It is not raining today
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If it is raining today then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, thus it is not raining today.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If it is raining today then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: It is not raining today
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If it is raining today then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so it can be concluded that it is not raining today.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If it is raining today then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: It is not raining today
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If it is raining today then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so it is not raining today.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If it is raining today then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: It is not raining today
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If it is raining today then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which implies that it is not raining today.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If it is raining today then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: It is not raining today
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If it is raining today then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which shows that it is not raining today.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If it is raining today then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: It is not raining today
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If it is raining today then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which establishes that it is not raining today.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If it is raining today then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: It is not raining today
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```It is not raining today, since if it is raining today then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If it is raining today then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: It is not raining today
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```It is not raining today, because if it is raining today then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If it is raining today then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: It is not raining today
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```It is not raining today, as if it is raining today then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If it is raining today then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: It is not raining today
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the sky is blue then the arson occurred on elm street, and the sky is blue, therefore the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the sky is blue then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The sky is blue
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the sky is blue then the arson occurred on elm street, and the sky is blue, hence the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the sky is blue then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The sky is blue
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the sky is blue then the arson occurred on elm street, and the sky is blue, thus the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the sky is blue then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The sky is blue
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the sky is blue then the arson occurred on elm street, and the sky is blue, so it can be concluded that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the sky is blue then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The sky is blue
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the sky is blue then the arson occurred on elm street, and the sky is blue, so the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the sky is blue then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The sky is blue
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the sky is blue then the arson occurred on elm street, and the sky is blue, which implies that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the sky is blue then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The sky is blue
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the sky is blue then the arson occurred on elm street, and the sky is blue, which shows that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the sky is blue then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The sky is blue
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the sky is blue then the arson occurred on elm street, and the sky is blue, which establishes that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the sky is blue then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The sky is blue
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, since if the sky is blue then the arson occurred on elm street and the sky is blue.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the sky is blue then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The sky is blue
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, because if the sky is blue then the arson occurred on elm street and the sky is blue.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the sky is blue then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The sky is blue
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, as if the sky is blue then the arson occurred on elm street and the sky is blue.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the sky is blue then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The sky is blue
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the sky is blue then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, therefore the sky is not blue.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the sky is blue then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The sky is not blue
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the sky is blue then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, hence the sky is not blue.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the sky is blue then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The sky is not blue
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the sky is blue then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, thus the sky is not blue.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the sky is blue then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The sky is not blue
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the sky is blue then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so it can be concluded that the sky is not blue.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the sky is blue then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The sky is not blue
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the sky is blue then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so the sky is not blue.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the sky is blue then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The sky is not blue
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the sky is blue then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which implies that the sky is not blue.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the sky is blue then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The sky is not blue
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the sky is blue then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which shows that the sky is not blue.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the sky is blue then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The sky is not blue
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the sky is blue then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which establishes that the sky is not blue.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the sky is blue then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The sky is not blue
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The sky is not blue, since if the sky is blue then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the sky is blue then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The sky is not blue
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The sky is not blue, because if the sky is blue then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the sky is blue then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The sky is not blue
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The sky is not blue, as if the sky is blue then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the sky is blue then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The sky is not blue
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the sun is shining then the arson occurred on elm street, and the sun is shining, therefore the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the sun is shining then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The sun is shining
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the sun is shining then the arson occurred on elm street, and the sun is shining, hence the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the sun is shining then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The sun is shining
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the sun is shining then the arson occurred on elm street, and the sun is shining, thus the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the sun is shining then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The sun is shining
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the sun is shining then the arson occurred on elm street, and the sun is shining, so it can be concluded that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the sun is shining then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The sun is shining
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the sun is shining then the arson occurred on elm street, and the sun is shining, so the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the sun is shining then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The sun is shining
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the sun is shining then the arson occurred on elm street, and the sun is shining, which implies that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the sun is shining then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The sun is shining
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the sun is shining then the arson occurred on elm street, and the sun is shining, which shows that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the sun is shining then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The sun is shining
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the sun is shining then the arson occurred on elm street, and the sun is shining, which establishes that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the sun is shining then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The sun is shining
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, since if the sun is shining then the arson occurred on elm street and the sun is shining.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the sun is shining then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The sun is shining
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, because if the sun is shining then the arson occurred on elm street and the sun is shining.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the sun is shining then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The sun is shining
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, as if the sun is shining then the arson occurred on elm street and the sun is shining.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the sun is shining then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The sun is shining
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the sun is shining then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, therefore the sun is not shining.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the sun is shining then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The sun is not shining
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the sun is shining then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, hence the sun is not shining.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the sun is shining then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The sun is not shining
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the sun is shining then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, thus the sun is not shining.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the sun is shining then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The sun is not shining
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the sun is shining then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so it can be concluded that the sun is not shining.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the sun is shining then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The sun is not shining
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the sun is shining then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so the sun is not shining.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the sun is shining then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The sun is not shining
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the sun is shining then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which implies that the sun is not shining.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the sun is shining then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The sun is not shining
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the sun is shining then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which shows that the sun is not shining.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the sun is shining then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The sun is not shining
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the sun is shining then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which establishes that the sun is not shining.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the sun is shining then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The sun is not shining
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The sun is not shining, since if the sun is shining then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the sun is shining then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The sun is not shining
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The sun is not shining, because if the sun is shining then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the sun is shining then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The sun is not shining
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The sun is not shining, as if the sun is shining then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the sun is shining then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The sun is not shining
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If water is h2o then the arson occurred on elm street, and water is h2o, therefore the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If water is h2o then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Water is h2o
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If water is h2o then the arson occurred on elm street, and water is h2o, hence the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If water is h2o then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Water is h2o
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If water is h2o then the arson occurred on elm street, and water is h2o, thus the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If water is h2o then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Water is h2o
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If water is h2o then the arson occurred on elm street, and water is h2o, so it can be concluded that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If water is h2o then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Water is h2o
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If water is h2o then the arson occurred on elm street, and water is h2o, so the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If water is h2o then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Water is h2o
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If water is h2o then the arson occurred on elm street, and water is h2o, which implies that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If water is h2o then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Water is h2o
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If water is h2o then the arson occurred on elm street, and water is h2o, which shows that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If water is h2o then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Water is h2o
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If water is h2o then the arson occurred on elm street, and water is h2o, which establishes that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If water is h2o then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Water is h2o
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, since if water is h2o then the arson occurred on elm street and water is h2o.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If water is h2o then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Water is h2o
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, because if water is h2o then the arson occurred on elm street and water is h2o.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If water is h2o then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Water is h2o
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, as if water is h2o then the arson occurred on elm street and water is h2o.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If water is h2o then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Water is h2o
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If water is h2o then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, therefore water is not h2o.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If water is h2o then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Water is not H2O
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If water is h2o then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, hence water is not h2o.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If water is h2o then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Water is not H2O
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If water is h2o then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, thus water is not h2o.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If water is h2o then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Water is not H2O
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If water is h2o then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so it can be concluded that water is not h2o.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If water is h2o then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Water is not H2O
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If water is h2o then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so water is not h2o.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If water is h2o then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Water is not H2O
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If water is h2o then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which implies that water is not h2o.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If water is h2o then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Water is not H2O
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If water is h2o then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which shows that water is not h2o.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If water is h2o then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Water is not H2O
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If water is h2o then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which establishes that water is not h2o.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If water is h2o then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Water is not H2O
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```Water is not h2o, since if water is h2o then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If water is h2o then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Water is not H2O
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```Water is not h2o, because if water is h2o then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If water is h2o then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Water is not H2O
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```Water is not h2o, as if water is h2o then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If water is h2o then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Water is not H2O
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If cats are mammals then the arson occurred on elm street, and cats are mammals, therefore the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If cats are mammals then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Cats are mammals
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.