<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street, and officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene, therefore the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
stringlengths 355
1.02k
|
|---|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, because if a map with the jewelry store's layout was found in emily's home then the arson occurred on elm street and a map with the jewelry store's layout was found in emily's home.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a map with the jewelry store's layout was found in emily's home then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: A map with the jewelry store's layout was found in emily's home
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, as if a map with the jewelry store's layout was found in emily's home then the arson occurred on elm street and a map with the jewelry store's layout was found in emily's home.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a map with the jewelry store's layout was found in emily's home then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: A map with the jewelry store's layout was found in emily's home
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a map with the jewelry store's layout was found in emily's home then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, therefore a map with the jewelry store's layout was not found in emily's home.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a map with the jewelry store's layout was found in emily's home then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: A map with the jewelry store's layout was not found in Emily's home
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a map with the jewelry store's layout was found in emily's home then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, hence a map with the jewelry store's layout was not found in emily's home.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a map with the jewelry store's layout was found in emily's home then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: A map with the jewelry store's layout was not found in Emily's home
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a map with the jewelry store's layout was found in emily's home then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, thus a map with the jewelry store's layout was not found in emily's home.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a map with the jewelry store's layout was found in emily's home then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: A map with the jewelry store's layout was not found in Emily's home
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a map with the jewelry store's layout was found in emily's home then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so it can be concluded that a map with the jewelry store's layout was not found in emily's home.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a map with the jewelry store's layout was found in emily's home then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: A map with the jewelry store's layout was not found in Emily's home
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a map with the jewelry store's layout was found in emily's home then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so a map with the jewelry store's layout was not found in emily's home.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a map with the jewelry store's layout was found in emily's home then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: A map with the jewelry store's layout was not found in Emily's home
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a map with the jewelry store's layout was found in emily's home then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which implies that a map with the jewelry store's layout was not found in emily's home.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a map with the jewelry store's layout was found in emily's home then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: A map with the jewelry store's layout was not found in Emily's home
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a map with the jewelry store's layout was found in emily's home then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which shows that a map with the jewelry store's layout was not found in emily's home.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a map with the jewelry store's layout was found in emily's home then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: A map with the jewelry store's layout was not found in Emily's home
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a map with the jewelry store's layout was found in emily's home then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which establishes that a map with the jewelry store's layout was not found in emily's home.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a map with the jewelry store's layout was found in emily's home then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: A map with the jewelry store's layout was not found in Emily's home
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```A map with the jewelry store's layout was not found in emily's home, since if a map with the jewelry store's layout was found in emily's home then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a map with the jewelry store's layout was found in emily's home then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: A map with the jewelry store's layout was not found in Emily's home
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```A map with the jewelry store's layout was not found in emily's home, because if a map with the jewelry store's layout was found in emily's home then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a map with the jewelry store's layout was found in emily's home then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: A map with the jewelry store's layout was not found in Emily's home
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```A map with the jewelry store's layout was not found in emily's home, as if a map with the jewelry store's layout was found in emily's home then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a map with the jewelry store's layout was found in emily's home then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: A map with the jewelry store's layout was not found in Emily's home
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If richard anderson had a secret offshore bank account then the arson occurred on elm street, and richard anderson had a secret offshore bank account, therefore the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If richard anderson had a secret offshore bank account then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Richard anderson had a secret offshore bank account
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If richard anderson had a secret offshore bank account then the arson occurred on elm street, and richard anderson had a secret offshore bank account, hence the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If richard anderson had a secret offshore bank account then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Richard anderson had a secret offshore bank account
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If richard anderson had a secret offshore bank account then the arson occurred on elm street, and richard anderson had a secret offshore bank account, thus the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If richard anderson had a secret offshore bank account then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Richard anderson had a secret offshore bank account
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If richard anderson had a secret offshore bank account then the arson occurred on elm street, and richard anderson had a secret offshore bank account, so it can be concluded that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If richard anderson had a secret offshore bank account then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Richard anderson had a secret offshore bank account
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If richard anderson had a secret offshore bank account then the arson occurred on elm street, and richard anderson had a secret offshore bank account, so the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If richard anderson had a secret offshore bank account then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Richard anderson had a secret offshore bank account
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If richard anderson had a secret offshore bank account then the arson occurred on elm street, and richard anderson had a secret offshore bank account, which implies that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If richard anderson had a secret offshore bank account then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Richard anderson had a secret offshore bank account
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If richard anderson had a secret offshore bank account then the arson occurred on elm street, and richard anderson had a secret offshore bank account, which shows that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If richard anderson had a secret offshore bank account then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Richard anderson had a secret offshore bank account
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If richard anderson had a secret offshore bank account then the arson occurred on elm street, and richard anderson had a secret offshore bank account, which establishes that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If richard anderson had a secret offshore bank account then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Richard anderson had a secret offshore bank account
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, since if richard anderson had a secret offshore bank account then the arson occurred on elm street and richard anderson had a secret offshore bank account.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If richard anderson had a secret offshore bank account then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Richard anderson had a secret offshore bank account
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, because if richard anderson had a secret offshore bank account then the arson occurred on elm street and richard anderson had a secret offshore bank account.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If richard anderson had a secret offshore bank account then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Richard anderson had a secret offshore bank account
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, as if richard anderson had a secret offshore bank account then the arson occurred on elm street and richard anderson had a secret offshore bank account.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If richard anderson had a secret offshore bank account then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Richard anderson had a secret offshore bank account
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If richard anderson had a secret offshore bank account then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, therefore richard anderson did not have a secret offshore bank account.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If richard anderson had a secret offshore bank account then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Richard Anderson did not have a secret offshore bank account
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If richard anderson had a secret offshore bank account then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, hence richard anderson did not have a secret offshore bank account.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If richard anderson had a secret offshore bank account then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Richard Anderson did not have a secret offshore bank account
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If richard anderson had a secret offshore bank account then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, thus richard anderson did not have a secret offshore bank account.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If richard anderson had a secret offshore bank account then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Richard Anderson did not have a secret offshore bank account
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If richard anderson had a secret offshore bank account then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so it can be concluded that richard anderson did not have a secret offshore bank account.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If richard anderson had a secret offshore bank account then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Richard Anderson did not have a secret offshore bank account
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If richard anderson had a secret offshore bank account then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so richard anderson did not have a secret offshore bank account.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If richard anderson had a secret offshore bank account then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Richard Anderson did not have a secret offshore bank account
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If richard anderson had a secret offshore bank account then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which implies that richard anderson did not have a secret offshore bank account.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If richard anderson had a secret offshore bank account then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Richard Anderson did not have a secret offshore bank account
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If richard anderson had a secret offshore bank account then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which shows that richard anderson did not have a secret offshore bank account.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If richard anderson had a secret offshore bank account then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Richard Anderson did not have a secret offshore bank account
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If richard anderson had a secret offshore bank account then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which establishes that richard anderson did not have a secret offshore bank account.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If richard anderson had a secret offshore bank account then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Richard Anderson did not have a secret offshore bank account
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```Richard anderson did not have a secret offshore bank account, since if richard anderson had a secret offshore bank account then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If richard anderson had a secret offshore bank account then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Richard Anderson did not have a secret offshore bank account
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```Richard anderson did not have a secret offshore bank account, because if richard anderson had a secret offshore bank account then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If richard anderson had a secret offshore bank account then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Richard Anderson did not have a secret offshore bank account
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```Richard anderson did not have a secret offshore bank account, as if richard anderson had a secret offshore bank account then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If richard anderson had a secret offshore bank account then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Richard Anderson did not have a secret offshore bank account
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If emily had a history of confrontations with her co-workers then the arson occurred on elm street, and emily had a history of confrontations with her co-workers, therefore the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If emily had a history of confrontations with her co-workers then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Emily had a history of confrontations with her co-workers
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If emily had a history of confrontations with her co-workers then the arson occurred on elm street, and emily had a history of confrontations with her co-workers, hence the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If emily had a history of confrontations with her co-workers then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Emily had a history of confrontations with her co-workers
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If emily had a history of confrontations with her co-workers then the arson occurred on elm street, and emily had a history of confrontations with her co-workers, thus the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If emily had a history of confrontations with her co-workers then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Emily had a history of confrontations with her co-workers
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If emily had a history of confrontations with her co-workers then the arson occurred on elm street, and emily had a history of confrontations with her co-workers, so it can be concluded that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If emily had a history of confrontations with her co-workers then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Emily had a history of confrontations with her co-workers
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If emily had a history of confrontations with her co-workers then the arson occurred on elm street, and emily had a history of confrontations with her co-workers, so the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If emily had a history of confrontations with her co-workers then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Emily had a history of confrontations with her co-workers
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If emily had a history of confrontations with her co-workers then the arson occurred on elm street, and emily had a history of confrontations with her co-workers, which implies that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If emily had a history of confrontations with her co-workers then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Emily had a history of confrontations with her co-workers
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If emily had a history of confrontations with her co-workers then the arson occurred on elm street, and emily had a history of confrontations with her co-workers, which shows that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If emily had a history of confrontations with her co-workers then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Emily had a history of confrontations with her co-workers
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If emily had a history of confrontations with her co-workers then the arson occurred on elm street, and emily had a history of confrontations with her co-workers, which establishes that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If emily had a history of confrontations with her co-workers then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Emily had a history of confrontations with her co-workers
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, since if emily had a history of confrontations with her co-workers then the arson occurred on elm street and emily had a history of confrontations with her co-workers.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If emily had a history of confrontations with her co-workers then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Emily had a history of confrontations with her co-workers
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, because if emily had a history of confrontations with her co-workers then the arson occurred on elm street and emily had a history of confrontations with her co-workers.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If emily had a history of confrontations with her co-workers then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Emily had a history of confrontations with her co-workers
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, as if emily had a history of confrontations with her co-workers then the arson occurred on elm street and emily had a history of confrontations with her co-workers.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If emily had a history of confrontations with her co-workers then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Emily had a history of confrontations with her co-workers
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If emily had a history of confrontations with her co-workers then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, therefore emily did not have a history of confrontations with her co-workers.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If emily had a history of confrontations with her co-workers then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Emily did not have a history of confrontations with her co-workers
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If emily had a history of confrontations with her co-workers then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, hence emily did not have a history of confrontations with her co-workers.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If emily had a history of confrontations with her co-workers then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Emily did not have a history of confrontations with her co-workers
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If emily had a history of confrontations with her co-workers then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, thus emily did not have a history of confrontations with her co-workers.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If emily had a history of confrontations with her co-workers then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Emily did not have a history of confrontations with her co-workers
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If emily had a history of confrontations with her co-workers then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so it can be concluded that emily did not have a history of confrontations with her co-workers.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If emily had a history of confrontations with her co-workers then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Emily did not have a history of confrontations with her co-workers
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If emily had a history of confrontations with her co-workers then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so emily did not have a history of confrontations with her co-workers.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If emily had a history of confrontations with her co-workers then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Emily did not have a history of confrontations with her co-workers
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If emily had a history of confrontations with her co-workers then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which implies that emily did not have a history of confrontations with her co-workers.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If emily had a history of confrontations with her co-workers then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Emily did not have a history of confrontations with her co-workers
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If emily had a history of confrontations with her co-workers then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which shows that emily did not have a history of confrontations with her co-workers.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If emily had a history of confrontations with her co-workers then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Emily did not have a history of confrontations with her co-workers
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If emily had a history of confrontations with her co-workers then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which establishes that emily did not have a history of confrontations with her co-workers.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If emily had a history of confrontations with her co-workers then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Emily did not have a history of confrontations with her co-workers
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```Emily did not have a history of confrontations with her co-workers, since if emily had a history of confrontations with her co-workers then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If emily had a history of confrontations with her co-workers then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Emily did not have a history of confrontations with her co-workers
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```Emily did not have a history of confrontations with her co-workers, because if emily had a history of confrontations with her co-workers then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If emily had a history of confrontations with her co-workers then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Emily did not have a history of confrontations with her co-workers
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```Emily did not have a history of confrontations with her co-workers, as if emily had a history of confrontations with her co-workers then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If emily had a history of confrontations with her co-workers then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Emily did not have a history of confrontations with her co-workers
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If sarah's cat was found abandoned outside her house then the arson occurred on elm street, and sarah's cat was found abandoned outside her house, therefore the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If sarah's cat was found abandoned outside her house then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Sarah's cat was found abandoned outside her house
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If sarah's cat was found abandoned outside her house then the arson occurred on elm street, and sarah's cat was found abandoned outside her house, hence the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If sarah's cat was found abandoned outside her house then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Sarah's cat was found abandoned outside her house
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If sarah's cat was found abandoned outside her house then the arson occurred on elm street, and sarah's cat was found abandoned outside her house, thus the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If sarah's cat was found abandoned outside her house then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Sarah's cat was found abandoned outside her house
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If sarah's cat was found abandoned outside her house then the arson occurred on elm street, and sarah's cat was found abandoned outside her house, so it can be concluded that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If sarah's cat was found abandoned outside her house then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Sarah's cat was found abandoned outside her house
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If sarah's cat was found abandoned outside her house then the arson occurred on elm street, and sarah's cat was found abandoned outside her house, so the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If sarah's cat was found abandoned outside her house then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Sarah's cat was found abandoned outside her house
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If sarah's cat was found abandoned outside her house then the arson occurred on elm street, and sarah's cat was found abandoned outside her house, which implies that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If sarah's cat was found abandoned outside her house then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Sarah's cat was found abandoned outside her house
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If sarah's cat was found abandoned outside her house then the arson occurred on elm street, and sarah's cat was found abandoned outside her house, which shows that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If sarah's cat was found abandoned outside her house then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Sarah's cat was found abandoned outside her house
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If sarah's cat was found abandoned outside her house then the arson occurred on elm street, and sarah's cat was found abandoned outside her house, which establishes that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If sarah's cat was found abandoned outside her house then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Sarah's cat was found abandoned outside her house
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, since if sarah's cat was found abandoned outside her house then the arson occurred on elm street and sarah's cat was found abandoned outside her house.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If sarah's cat was found abandoned outside her house then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Sarah's cat was found abandoned outside her house
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, because if sarah's cat was found abandoned outside her house then the arson occurred on elm street and sarah's cat was found abandoned outside her house.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If sarah's cat was found abandoned outside her house then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Sarah's cat was found abandoned outside her house
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, as if sarah's cat was found abandoned outside her house then the arson occurred on elm street and sarah's cat was found abandoned outside her house.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If sarah's cat was found abandoned outside her house then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Sarah's cat was found abandoned outside her house
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If sarah's cat was found abandoned outside her house then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, therefore sarah's cat was not found abandoned outside her house.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If sarah's cat was found abandoned outside her house then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Sarah's cat was not found abandoned outside her house
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If sarah's cat was found abandoned outside her house then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, hence sarah's cat was not found abandoned outside her house.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If sarah's cat was found abandoned outside her house then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Sarah's cat was not found abandoned outside her house
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If sarah's cat was found abandoned outside her house then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, thus sarah's cat was not found abandoned outside her house.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If sarah's cat was found abandoned outside her house then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Sarah's cat was not found abandoned outside her house
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If sarah's cat was found abandoned outside her house then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so it can be concluded that sarah's cat was not found abandoned outside her house.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If sarah's cat was found abandoned outside her house then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Sarah's cat was not found abandoned outside her house
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If sarah's cat was found abandoned outside her house then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so sarah's cat was not found abandoned outside her house.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If sarah's cat was found abandoned outside her house then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Sarah's cat was not found abandoned outside her house
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If sarah's cat was found abandoned outside her house then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which implies that sarah's cat was not found abandoned outside her house.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If sarah's cat was found abandoned outside her house then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Sarah's cat was not found abandoned outside her house
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If sarah's cat was found abandoned outside her house then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which shows that sarah's cat was not found abandoned outside her house.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If sarah's cat was found abandoned outside her house then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Sarah's cat was not found abandoned outside her house
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If sarah's cat was found abandoned outside her house then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which establishes that sarah's cat was not found abandoned outside her house.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If sarah's cat was found abandoned outside her house then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Sarah's cat was not found abandoned outside her house
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```Sarah's cat was not found abandoned outside her house, since if sarah's cat was found abandoned outside her house then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If sarah's cat was found abandoned outside her house then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Sarah's cat was not found abandoned outside her house
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```Sarah's cat was not found abandoned outside her house, because if sarah's cat was found abandoned outside her house then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If sarah's cat was found abandoned outside her house then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Sarah's cat was not found abandoned outside her house
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```Sarah's cat was not found abandoned outside her house, as if sarah's cat was found abandoned outside her house then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If sarah's cat was found abandoned outside her house then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Sarah's cat was not found abandoned outside her house
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If detective martin discovered a stash of stolen jewelry in charlie's makeshift shelter then the arson occurred on elm street, and detective martin discovered a stash of stolen jewelry in charlie's makeshift shelter, therefore the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If detective martin discovered a stash of stolen jewelry in charlie's makeshift shelter then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Detective martin discovered a stash of stolen jewelry in charlie's makeshift shelter
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If detective martin discovered a stash of stolen jewelry in charlie's makeshift shelter then the arson occurred on elm street, and detective martin discovered a stash of stolen jewelry in charlie's makeshift shelter, hence the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If detective martin discovered a stash of stolen jewelry in charlie's makeshift shelter then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Detective martin discovered a stash of stolen jewelry in charlie's makeshift shelter
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If detective martin discovered a stash of stolen jewelry in charlie's makeshift shelter then the arson occurred on elm street, and detective martin discovered a stash of stolen jewelry in charlie's makeshift shelter, thus the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If detective martin discovered a stash of stolen jewelry in charlie's makeshift shelter then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Detective martin discovered a stash of stolen jewelry in charlie's makeshift shelter
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If detective martin discovered a stash of stolen jewelry in charlie's makeshift shelter then the arson occurred on elm street, and detective martin discovered a stash of stolen jewelry in charlie's makeshift shelter, so it can be concluded that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If detective martin discovered a stash of stolen jewelry in charlie's makeshift shelter then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Detective martin discovered a stash of stolen jewelry in charlie's makeshift shelter
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If detective martin discovered a stash of stolen jewelry in charlie's makeshift shelter then the arson occurred on elm street, and detective martin discovered a stash of stolen jewelry in charlie's makeshift shelter, so the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If detective martin discovered a stash of stolen jewelry in charlie's makeshift shelter then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Detective martin discovered a stash of stolen jewelry in charlie's makeshift shelter
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If detective martin discovered a stash of stolen jewelry in charlie's makeshift shelter then the arson occurred on elm street, and detective martin discovered a stash of stolen jewelry in charlie's makeshift shelter, which implies that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If detective martin discovered a stash of stolen jewelry in charlie's makeshift shelter then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Detective martin discovered a stash of stolen jewelry in charlie's makeshift shelter
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If detective martin discovered a stash of stolen jewelry in charlie's makeshift shelter then the arson occurred on elm street, and detective martin discovered a stash of stolen jewelry in charlie's makeshift shelter, which shows that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If detective martin discovered a stash of stolen jewelry in charlie's makeshift shelter then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Detective martin discovered a stash of stolen jewelry in charlie's makeshift shelter
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If detective martin discovered a stash of stolen jewelry in charlie's makeshift shelter then the arson occurred on elm street, and detective martin discovered a stash of stolen jewelry in charlie's makeshift shelter, which establishes that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If detective martin discovered a stash of stolen jewelry in charlie's makeshift shelter then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Detective martin discovered a stash of stolen jewelry in charlie's makeshift shelter
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, since if detective martin discovered a stash of stolen jewelry in charlie's makeshift shelter then the arson occurred on elm street and detective martin discovered a stash of stolen jewelry in charlie's makeshift shelter.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If detective martin discovered a stash of stolen jewelry in charlie's makeshift shelter then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Detective martin discovered a stash of stolen jewelry in charlie's makeshift shelter
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, because if detective martin discovered a stash of stolen jewelry in charlie's makeshift shelter then the arson occurred on elm street and detective martin discovered a stash of stolen jewelry in charlie's makeshift shelter.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If detective martin discovered a stash of stolen jewelry in charlie's makeshift shelter then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Detective martin discovered a stash of stolen jewelry in charlie's makeshift shelter
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, as if detective martin discovered a stash of stolen jewelry in charlie's makeshift shelter then the arson occurred on elm street and detective martin discovered a stash of stolen jewelry in charlie's makeshift shelter.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If detective martin discovered a stash of stolen jewelry in charlie's makeshift shelter then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Detective martin discovered a stash of stolen jewelry in charlie's makeshift shelter
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If detective martin discovered a stash of stolen jewelry in charlie's makeshift shelter then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, therefore detective martin did not discover a stash of stolen jewelry in charlie's makeshift shelter.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If detective martin discovered a stash of stolen jewelry in charlie's makeshift shelter then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Detective Martin did not discover a stash of stolen jewelry in Charlie's makeshift shelter
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If detective martin discovered a stash of stolen jewelry in charlie's makeshift shelter then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, hence detective martin did not discover a stash of stolen jewelry in charlie's makeshift shelter.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If detective martin discovered a stash of stolen jewelry in charlie's makeshift shelter then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Detective Martin did not discover a stash of stolen jewelry in Charlie's makeshift shelter
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If detective martin discovered a stash of stolen jewelry in charlie's makeshift shelter then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, thus detective martin did not discover a stash of stolen jewelry in charlie's makeshift shelter.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If detective martin discovered a stash of stolen jewelry in charlie's makeshift shelter then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Detective Martin did not discover a stash of stolen jewelry in Charlie's makeshift shelter
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If detective martin discovered a stash of stolen jewelry in charlie's makeshift shelter then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so it can be concluded that detective martin did not discover a stash of stolen jewelry in charlie's makeshift shelter.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If detective martin discovered a stash of stolen jewelry in charlie's makeshift shelter then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Detective Martin did not discover a stash of stolen jewelry in Charlie's makeshift shelter
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If detective martin discovered a stash of stolen jewelry in charlie's makeshift shelter then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so detective martin did not discover a stash of stolen jewelry in charlie's makeshift shelter.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If detective martin discovered a stash of stolen jewelry in charlie's makeshift shelter then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Detective Martin did not discover a stash of stolen jewelry in Charlie's makeshift shelter
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If detective martin discovered a stash of stolen jewelry in charlie's makeshift shelter then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which implies that detective martin did not discover a stash of stolen jewelry in charlie's makeshift shelter.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If detective martin discovered a stash of stolen jewelry in charlie's makeshift shelter then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Detective Martin did not discover a stash of stolen jewelry in Charlie's makeshift shelter
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If detective martin discovered a stash of stolen jewelry in charlie's makeshift shelter then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which shows that detective martin did not discover a stash of stolen jewelry in charlie's makeshift shelter.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If detective martin discovered a stash of stolen jewelry in charlie's makeshift shelter then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Detective Martin did not discover a stash of stolen jewelry in Charlie's makeshift shelter
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If detective martin discovered a stash of stolen jewelry in charlie's makeshift shelter then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which establishes that detective martin did not discover a stash of stolen jewelry in charlie's makeshift shelter.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If detective martin discovered a stash of stolen jewelry in charlie's makeshift shelter then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Detective Martin did not discover a stash of stolen jewelry in Charlie's makeshift shelter
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```Detective martin did not discover a stash of stolen jewelry in charlie's makeshift shelter, since if detective martin discovered a stash of stolen jewelry in charlie's makeshift shelter then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If detective martin discovered a stash of stolen jewelry in charlie's makeshift shelter then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Detective Martin did not discover a stash of stolen jewelry in Charlie's makeshift shelter
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```Detective martin did not discover a stash of stolen jewelry in charlie's makeshift shelter, because if detective martin discovered a stash of stolen jewelry in charlie's makeshift shelter then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If detective martin discovered a stash of stolen jewelry in charlie's makeshift shelter then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Detective Martin did not discover a stash of stolen jewelry in Charlie's makeshift shelter
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.