<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street, and officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene, therefore the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
stringlengths 355
1.02k
|
|---|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If cats are mammals then the arson occurred on elm street, and cats are mammals, hence the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If cats are mammals then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Cats are mammals
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If cats are mammals then the arson occurred on elm street, and cats are mammals, thus the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If cats are mammals then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Cats are mammals
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If cats are mammals then the arson occurred on elm street, and cats are mammals, so it can be concluded that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If cats are mammals then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Cats are mammals
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If cats are mammals then the arson occurred on elm street, and cats are mammals, so the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If cats are mammals then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Cats are mammals
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If cats are mammals then the arson occurred on elm street, and cats are mammals, which implies that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If cats are mammals then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Cats are mammals
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If cats are mammals then the arson occurred on elm street, and cats are mammals, which shows that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If cats are mammals then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Cats are mammals
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If cats are mammals then the arson occurred on elm street, and cats are mammals, which establishes that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If cats are mammals then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Cats are mammals
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, since if cats are mammals then the arson occurred on elm street and cats are mammals.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If cats are mammals then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Cats are mammals
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, because if cats are mammals then the arson occurred on elm street and cats are mammals.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If cats are mammals then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Cats are mammals
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, as if cats are mammals then the arson occurred on elm street and cats are mammals.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If cats are mammals then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Cats are mammals
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If cats are mammals then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, therefore cats are not mammals.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If cats are mammals then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Cats are not mammals
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If cats are mammals then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, hence cats are not mammals.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If cats are mammals then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Cats are not mammals
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If cats are mammals then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, thus cats are not mammals.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If cats are mammals then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Cats are not mammals
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If cats are mammals then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so it can be concluded that cats are not mammals.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If cats are mammals then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Cats are not mammals
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If cats are mammals then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so cats are not mammals.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If cats are mammals then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Cats are not mammals
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If cats are mammals then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which implies that cats are not mammals.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If cats are mammals then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Cats are not mammals
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If cats are mammals then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which shows that cats are not mammals.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If cats are mammals then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Cats are not mammals
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If cats are mammals then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which establishes that cats are not mammals.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If cats are mammals then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Cats are not mammals
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```Cats are not mammals, since if cats are mammals then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If cats are mammals then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Cats are not mammals
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```Cats are not mammals, because if cats are mammals then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If cats are mammals then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Cats are not mammals
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```Cats are not mammals, as if cats are mammals then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If cats are mammals then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Cats are not mammals
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If dogs are not fish then the arson occurred on elm street, and dogs are not fish, therefore the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If dogs are not fish then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Dogs are not fish
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If dogs are not fish then the arson occurred on elm street, and dogs are not fish, hence the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If dogs are not fish then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Dogs are not fish
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If dogs are not fish then the arson occurred on elm street, and dogs are not fish, thus the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If dogs are not fish then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Dogs are not fish
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If dogs are not fish then the arson occurred on elm street, and dogs are not fish, so it can be concluded that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If dogs are not fish then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Dogs are not fish
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If dogs are not fish then the arson occurred on elm street, and dogs are not fish, so the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If dogs are not fish then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Dogs are not fish
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If dogs are not fish then the arson occurred on elm street, and dogs are not fish, which implies that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If dogs are not fish then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Dogs are not fish
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If dogs are not fish then the arson occurred on elm street, and dogs are not fish, which shows that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If dogs are not fish then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Dogs are not fish
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If dogs are not fish then the arson occurred on elm street, and dogs are not fish, which establishes that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If dogs are not fish then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Dogs are not fish
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, since if dogs are not fish then the arson occurred on elm street and dogs are not fish.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If dogs are not fish then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Dogs are not fish
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, because if dogs are not fish then the arson occurred on elm street and dogs are not fish.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If dogs are not fish then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Dogs are not fish
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, as if dogs are not fish then the arson occurred on elm street and dogs are not fish.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If dogs are not fish then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Dogs are not fish
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If dogs are not fish then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, therefore dogs are fish.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If dogs are not fish then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Dogs are fish
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If dogs are not fish then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, hence dogs are fish.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If dogs are not fish then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Dogs are fish
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If dogs are not fish then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, thus dogs are fish.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If dogs are not fish then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Dogs are fish
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If dogs are not fish then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so it can be concluded that dogs are fish.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If dogs are not fish then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Dogs are fish
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If dogs are not fish then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so dogs are fish.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If dogs are not fish then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Dogs are fish
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If dogs are not fish then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which implies that dogs are fish.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If dogs are not fish then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Dogs are fish
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If dogs are not fish then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which shows that dogs are fish.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If dogs are not fish then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Dogs are fish
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If dogs are not fish then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which establishes that dogs are fish.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If dogs are not fish then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Dogs are fish
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```Dogs are fish, since if dogs are not fish then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If dogs are not fish then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Dogs are fish
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```Dogs are fish, because if dogs are not fish then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If dogs are not fish then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Dogs are fish
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```Dogs are fish, as if dogs are not fish then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If dogs are not fish then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Dogs are fish
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If paris is in france then the arson occurred on elm street, and paris is in france, therefore the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If paris is in france then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Paris is in france
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If paris is in france then the arson occurred on elm street, and paris is in france, hence the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If paris is in france then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Paris is in france
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If paris is in france then the arson occurred on elm street, and paris is in france, thus the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If paris is in france then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Paris is in france
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If paris is in france then the arson occurred on elm street, and paris is in france, so it can be concluded that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If paris is in france then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Paris is in france
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If paris is in france then the arson occurred on elm street, and paris is in france, so the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If paris is in france then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Paris is in france
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If paris is in france then the arson occurred on elm street, and paris is in france, which implies that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If paris is in france then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Paris is in france
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If paris is in france then the arson occurred on elm street, and paris is in france, which shows that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If paris is in france then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Paris is in france
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If paris is in france then the arson occurred on elm street, and paris is in france, which establishes that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If paris is in france then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Paris is in france
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, since if paris is in france then the arson occurred on elm street and paris is in france.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If paris is in france then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Paris is in france
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, because if paris is in france then the arson occurred on elm street and paris is in france.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If paris is in france then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Paris is in france
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, as if paris is in france then the arson occurred on elm street and paris is in france.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If paris is in france then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Paris is in france
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If paris is in france then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, therefore paris is not in france.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If paris is in france then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Paris is not in France
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If paris is in france then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, hence paris is not in france.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If paris is in france then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Paris is not in France
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If paris is in france then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, thus paris is not in france.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If paris is in france then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Paris is not in France
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If paris is in france then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so it can be concluded that paris is not in france.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If paris is in france then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Paris is not in France
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If paris is in france then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so paris is not in france.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If paris is in france then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Paris is not in France
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If paris is in france then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which implies that paris is not in france.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If paris is in france then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Paris is not in France
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If paris is in france then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which shows that paris is not in france.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If paris is in france then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Paris is not in France
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If paris is in france then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which establishes that paris is not in france.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If paris is in france then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Paris is not in France
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```Paris is not in france, since if paris is in france then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If paris is in france then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Paris is not in France
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```Paris is not in france, because if paris is in france then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If paris is in france then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Paris is not in France
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```Paris is not in france, as if paris is in france then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If paris is in france then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Paris is not in France
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the eiffel tower is in paris then the arson occurred on elm street, and the eiffel tower is in paris, therefore the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the eiffel tower is in paris then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The eiffel tower is in paris
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the eiffel tower is in paris then the arson occurred on elm street, and the eiffel tower is in paris, hence the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the eiffel tower is in paris then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The eiffel tower is in paris
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the eiffel tower is in paris then the arson occurred on elm street, and the eiffel tower is in paris, thus the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the eiffel tower is in paris then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The eiffel tower is in paris
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the eiffel tower is in paris then the arson occurred on elm street, and the eiffel tower is in paris, so it can be concluded that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the eiffel tower is in paris then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The eiffel tower is in paris
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the eiffel tower is in paris then the arson occurred on elm street, and the eiffel tower is in paris, so the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the eiffel tower is in paris then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The eiffel tower is in paris
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the eiffel tower is in paris then the arson occurred on elm street, and the eiffel tower is in paris, which implies that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the eiffel tower is in paris then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The eiffel tower is in paris
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the eiffel tower is in paris then the arson occurred on elm street, and the eiffel tower is in paris, which shows that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the eiffel tower is in paris then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The eiffel tower is in paris
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the eiffel tower is in paris then the arson occurred on elm street, and the eiffel tower is in paris, which establishes that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the eiffel tower is in paris then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The eiffel tower is in paris
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, since if the eiffel tower is in paris then the arson occurred on elm street and the eiffel tower is in paris.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the eiffel tower is in paris then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The eiffel tower is in paris
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, because if the eiffel tower is in paris then the arson occurred on elm street and the eiffel tower is in paris.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the eiffel tower is in paris then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The eiffel tower is in paris
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, as if the eiffel tower is in paris then the arson occurred on elm street and the eiffel tower is in paris.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the eiffel tower is in paris then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The eiffel tower is in paris
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the eiffel tower is in paris then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, therefore the eiffel tower is not in paris.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the eiffel tower is in paris then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The Eiffel Tower is not in Paris
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the eiffel tower is in paris then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, hence the eiffel tower is not in paris.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the eiffel tower is in paris then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The Eiffel Tower is not in Paris
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the eiffel tower is in paris then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, thus the eiffel tower is not in paris.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the eiffel tower is in paris then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The Eiffel Tower is not in Paris
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the eiffel tower is in paris then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so it can be concluded that the eiffel tower is not in paris.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the eiffel tower is in paris then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The Eiffel Tower is not in Paris
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the eiffel tower is in paris then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so the eiffel tower is not in paris.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the eiffel tower is in paris then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The Eiffel Tower is not in Paris
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the eiffel tower is in paris then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which implies that the eiffel tower is not in paris.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the eiffel tower is in paris then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The Eiffel Tower is not in Paris
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the eiffel tower is in paris then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which shows that the eiffel tower is not in paris.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the eiffel tower is in paris then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The Eiffel Tower is not in Paris
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the eiffel tower is in paris then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which establishes that the eiffel tower is not in paris.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the eiffel tower is in paris then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The Eiffel Tower is not in Paris
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The eiffel tower is not in paris, since if the eiffel tower is in paris then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the eiffel tower is in paris then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The Eiffel Tower is not in Paris
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The eiffel tower is not in paris, because if the eiffel tower is in paris then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the eiffel tower is in paris then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The Eiffel Tower is not in Paris
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The eiffel tower is not in paris, as if the eiffel tower is in paris then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the eiffel tower is in paris then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The Eiffel Tower is not in Paris
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If sally is older than john then the arson occurred on elm street, and sally is older than john, therefore the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If sally is older than john then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Sally is older than john
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If sally is older than john then the arson occurred on elm street, and sally is older than john, hence the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If sally is older than john then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Sally is older than john
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If sally is older than john then the arson occurred on elm street, and sally is older than john, thus the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If sally is older than john then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Sally is older than john
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If sally is older than john then the arson occurred on elm street, and sally is older than john, so it can be concluded that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If sally is older than john then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Sally is older than john
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If sally is older than john then the arson occurred on elm street, and sally is older than john, so the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If sally is older than john then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Sally is older than john
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If sally is older than john then the arson occurred on elm street, and sally is older than john, which implies that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If sally is older than john then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Sally is older than john
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If sally is older than john then the arson occurred on elm street, and sally is older than john, which shows that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If sally is older than john then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Sally is older than john
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If sally is older than john then the arson occurred on elm street, and sally is older than john, which establishes that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If sally is older than john then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Sally is older than john
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, since if sally is older than john then the arson occurred on elm street and sally is older than john.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If sally is older than john then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Sally is older than john
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, because if sally is older than john then the arson occurred on elm street and sally is older than john.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If sally is older than john then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Sally is older than john
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, as if sally is older than john then the arson occurred on elm street and sally is older than john.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If sally is older than john then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Sally is older than john
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If sally is older than john then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, therefore sally is not older than john.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If sally is older than john then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Sally is not older than John
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If sally is older than john then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, hence sally is not older than john.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If sally is older than john then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Sally is not older than John
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.