<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street, and officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene, therefore the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
stringlengths 355
1.02k
|
|---|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```Detective martin did not discover a stash of stolen jewelry in charlie's makeshift shelter, as if detective martin discovered a stash of stolen jewelry in charlie's makeshift shelter then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If detective martin discovered a stash of stolen jewelry in charlie's makeshift shelter then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Detective Martin did not discover a stash of stolen jewelry in Charlie's makeshift shelter
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If emily had recently taken a self-defense course then the arson occurred on elm street, and emily had recently taken a self-defense course, therefore the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If emily had recently taken a self-defense course then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Emily had recently taken a self-defense course
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If emily had recently taken a self-defense course then the arson occurred on elm street, and emily had recently taken a self-defense course, hence the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If emily had recently taken a self-defense course then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Emily had recently taken a self-defense course
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If emily had recently taken a self-defense course then the arson occurred on elm street, and emily had recently taken a self-defense course, thus the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If emily had recently taken a self-defense course then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Emily had recently taken a self-defense course
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If emily had recently taken a self-defense course then the arson occurred on elm street, and emily had recently taken a self-defense course, so it can be concluded that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If emily had recently taken a self-defense course then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Emily had recently taken a self-defense course
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If emily had recently taken a self-defense course then the arson occurred on elm street, and emily had recently taken a self-defense course, so the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If emily had recently taken a self-defense course then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Emily had recently taken a self-defense course
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If emily had recently taken a self-defense course then the arson occurred on elm street, and emily had recently taken a self-defense course, which implies that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If emily had recently taken a self-defense course then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Emily had recently taken a self-defense course
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If emily had recently taken a self-defense course then the arson occurred on elm street, and emily had recently taken a self-defense course, which shows that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If emily had recently taken a self-defense course then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Emily had recently taken a self-defense course
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If emily had recently taken a self-defense course then the arson occurred on elm street, and emily had recently taken a self-defense course, which establishes that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If emily had recently taken a self-defense course then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Emily had recently taken a self-defense course
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, since if emily had recently taken a self-defense course then the arson occurred on elm street and emily had recently taken a self-defense course.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If emily had recently taken a self-defense course then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Emily had recently taken a self-defense course
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, because if emily had recently taken a self-defense course then the arson occurred on elm street and emily had recently taken a self-defense course.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If emily had recently taken a self-defense course then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Emily had recently taken a self-defense course
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, as if emily had recently taken a self-defense course then the arson occurred on elm street and emily had recently taken a self-defense course.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If emily had recently taken a self-defense course then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Emily had recently taken a self-defense course
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If emily had recently taken a self-defense course then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, therefore emily had not recently taken a self-defense course.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If emily had recently taken a self-defense course then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Emily had not recently taken a self-defense course
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If emily had recently taken a self-defense course then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, hence emily had not recently taken a self-defense course.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If emily had recently taken a self-defense course then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Emily had not recently taken a self-defense course
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If emily had recently taken a self-defense course then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, thus emily had not recently taken a self-defense course.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If emily had recently taken a self-defense course then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Emily had not recently taken a self-defense course
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If emily had recently taken a self-defense course then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so it can be concluded that emily had not recently taken a self-defense course.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If emily had recently taken a self-defense course then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Emily had not recently taken a self-defense course
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If emily had recently taken a self-defense course then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so emily had not recently taken a self-defense course.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If emily had recently taken a self-defense course then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Emily had not recently taken a self-defense course
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If emily had recently taken a self-defense course then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which implies that emily had not recently taken a self-defense course.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If emily had recently taken a self-defense course then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Emily had not recently taken a self-defense course
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If emily had recently taken a self-defense course then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which shows that emily had not recently taken a self-defense course.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If emily had recently taken a self-defense course then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Emily had not recently taken a self-defense course
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If emily had recently taken a self-defense course then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which establishes that emily had not recently taken a self-defense course.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If emily had recently taken a self-defense course then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Emily had not recently taken a self-defense course
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```Emily had not recently taken a self-defense course, since if emily had recently taken a self-defense course then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If emily had recently taken a self-defense course then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Emily had not recently taken a self-defense course
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```Emily had not recently taken a self-defense course, because if emily had recently taken a self-defense course then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If emily had recently taken a self-defense course then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Emily had not recently taken a self-defense course
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```Emily had not recently taken a self-defense course, as if emily had recently taken a self-defense course then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If emily had recently taken a self-defense course then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Emily had not recently taken a self-defense course
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a note threatening sarah was found under her pillow then the arson occurred on elm street, and a note threatening sarah was found under her pillow, therefore the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a note threatening sarah was found under her pillow then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: A note threatening sarah was found under her pillow
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a note threatening sarah was found under her pillow then the arson occurred on elm street, and a note threatening sarah was found under her pillow, hence the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a note threatening sarah was found under her pillow then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: A note threatening sarah was found under her pillow
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a note threatening sarah was found under her pillow then the arson occurred on elm street, and a note threatening sarah was found under her pillow, thus the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a note threatening sarah was found under her pillow then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: A note threatening sarah was found under her pillow
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a note threatening sarah was found under her pillow then the arson occurred on elm street, and a note threatening sarah was found under her pillow, so it can be concluded that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a note threatening sarah was found under her pillow then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: A note threatening sarah was found under her pillow
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a note threatening sarah was found under her pillow then the arson occurred on elm street, and a note threatening sarah was found under her pillow, so the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a note threatening sarah was found under her pillow then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: A note threatening sarah was found under her pillow
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a note threatening sarah was found under her pillow then the arson occurred on elm street, and a note threatening sarah was found under her pillow, which implies that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a note threatening sarah was found under her pillow then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: A note threatening sarah was found under her pillow
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a note threatening sarah was found under her pillow then the arson occurred on elm street, and a note threatening sarah was found under her pillow, which shows that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a note threatening sarah was found under her pillow then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: A note threatening sarah was found under her pillow
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a note threatening sarah was found under her pillow then the arson occurred on elm street, and a note threatening sarah was found under her pillow, which establishes that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a note threatening sarah was found under her pillow then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: A note threatening sarah was found under her pillow
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, since if a note threatening sarah was found under her pillow then the arson occurred on elm street and a note threatening sarah was found under her pillow.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a note threatening sarah was found under her pillow then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: A note threatening sarah was found under her pillow
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, because if a note threatening sarah was found under her pillow then the arson occurred on elm street and a note threatening sarah was found under her pillow.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a note threatening sarah was found under her pillow then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: A note threatening sarah was found under her pillow
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, as if a note threatening sarah was found under her pillow then the arson occurred on elm street and a note threatening sarah was found under her pillow.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a note threatening sarah was found under her pillow then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: A note threatening sarah was found under her pillow
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a note threatening sarah was found under her pillow then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, therefore no note threatening sarah was found under her pillow.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a note threatening sarah was found under her pillow then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: No note threatening Sarah was found under her pillow
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a note threatening sarah was found under her pillow then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, hence no note threatening sarah was found under her pillow.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a note threatening sarah was found under her pillow then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: No note threatening Sarah was found under her pillow
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a note threatening sarah was found under her pillow then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, thus no note threatening sarah was found under her pillow.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a note threatening sarah was found under her pillow then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: No note threatening Sarah was found under her pillow
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a note threatening sarah was found under her pillow then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so it can be concluded that no note threatening sarah was found under her pillow.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a note threatening sarah was found under her pillow then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: No note threatening Sarah was found under her pillow
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a note threatening sarah was found under her pillow then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so no note threatening sarah was found under her pillow.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a note threatening sarah was found under her pillow then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: No note threatening Sarah was found under her pillow
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a note threatening sarah was found under her pillow then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which implies that no note threatening sarah was found under her pillow.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a note threatening sarah was found under her pillow then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: No note threatening Sarah was found under her pillow
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a note threatening sarah was found under her pillow then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which shows that no note threatening sarah was found under her pillow.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a note threatening sarah was found under her pillow then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: No note threatening Sarah was found under her pillow
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a note threatening sarah was found under her pillow then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which establishes that no note threatening sarah was found under her pillow.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a note threatening sarah was found under her pillow then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: No note threatening Sarah was found under her pillow
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```No note threatening sarah was found under her pillow, since if a note threatening sarah was found under her pillow then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a note threatening sarah was found under her pillow then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: No note threatening Sarah was found under her pillow
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```No note threatening sarah was found under her pillow, because if a note threatening sarah was found under her pillow then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a note threatening sarah was found under her pillow then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: No note threatening Sarah was found under her pillow
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```No note threatening sarah was found under her pillow, as if a note threatening sarah was found under her pillow then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a note threatening sarah was found under her pillow then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: No note threatening Sarah was found under her pillow
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the stolen van was registered in a fake name then the arson occurred on elm street, and the stolen van was registered in a fake name, therefore the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the stolen van was registered in a fake name then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The stolen van was registered in a fake name
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the stolen van was registered in a fake name then the arson occurred on elm street, and the stolen van was registered in a fake name, hence the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the stolen van was registered in a fake name then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The stolen van was registered in a fake name
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the stolen van was registered in a fake name then the arson occurred on elm street, and the stolen van was registered in a fake name, thus the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the stolen van was registered in a fake name then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The stolen van was registered in a fake name
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the stolen van was registered in a fake name then the arson occurred on elm street, and the stolen van was registered in a fake name, so it can be concluded that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the stolen van was registered in a fake name then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The stolen van was registered in a fake name
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the stolen van was registered in a fake name then the arson occurred on elm street, and the stolen van was registered in a fake name, so the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the stolen van was registered in a fake name then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The stolen van was registered in a fake name
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the stolen van was registered in a fake name then the arson occurred on elm street, and the stolen van was registered in a fake name, which implies that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the stolen van was registered in a fake name then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The stolen van was registered in a fake name
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the stolen van was registered in a fake name then the arson occurred on elm street, and the stolen van was registered in a fake name, which shows that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the stolen van was registered in a fake name then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The stolen van was registered in a fake name
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the stolen van was registered in a fake name then the arson occurred on elm street, and the stolen van was registered in a fake name, which establishes that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the stolen van was registered in a fake name then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The stolen van was registered in a fake name
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, since if the stolen van was registered in a fake name then the arson occurred on elm street and the stolen van was registered in a fake name.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the stolen van was registered in a fake name then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The stolen van was registered in a fake name
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, because if the stolen van was registered in a fake name then the arson occurred on elm street and the stolen van was registered in a fake name.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the stolen van was registered in a fake name then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The stolen van was registered in a fake name
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, as if the stolen van was registered in a fake name then the arson occurred on elm street and the stolen van was registered in a fake name.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the stolen van was registered in a fake name then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The stolen van was registered in a fake name
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the stolen van was registered in a fake name then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, therefore the stolen van was not registered in a fake name.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the stolen van was registered in a fake name then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The stolen van was not registered in a fake name
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the stolen van was registered in a fake name then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, hence the stolen van was not registered in a fake name.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the stolen van was registered in a fake name then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The stolen van was not registered in a fake name
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the stolen van was registered in a fake name then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, thus the stolen van was not registered in a fake name.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the stolen van was registered in a fake name then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The stolen van was not registered in a fake name
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the stolen van was registered in a fake name then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so it can be concluded that the stolen van was not registered in a fake name.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the stolen van was registered in a fake name then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The stolen van was not registered in a fake name
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the stolen van was registered in a fake name then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so the stolen van was not registered in a fake name.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the stolen van was registered in a fake name then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The stolen van was not registered in a fake name
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the stolen van was registered in a fake name then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which implies that the stolen van was not registered in a fake name.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the stolen van was registered in a fake name then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The stolen van was not registered in a fake name
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the stolen van was registered in a fake name then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which shows that the stolen van was not registered in a fake name.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the stolen van was registered in a fake name then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The stolen van was not registered in a fake name
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the stolen van was registered in a fake name then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which establishes that the stolen van was not registered in a fake name.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the stolen van was registered in a fake name then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The stolen van was not registered in a fake name
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The stolen van was not registered in a fake name, since if the stolen van was registered in a fake name then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the stolen van was registered in a fake name then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The stolen van was not registered in a fake name
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The stolen van was not registered in a fake name, because if the stolen van was registered in a fake name then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the stolen van was registered in a fake name then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The stolen van was not registered in a fake name
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The stolen van was not registered in a fake name, as if the stolen van was registered in a fake name then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the stolen van was registered in a fake name then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The stolen van was not registered in a fake name
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If surveillance footage shows emily visiting a pawn shop the day after the robbery then the arson occurred on elm street, and surveillance footage shows emily visiting a pawn shop the day after the robbery, therefore the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If surveillance footage shows emily visiting a pawn shop the day after the robbery then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Surveillance footage shows emily visiting a pawn shop the day after the robbery
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If surveillance footage shows emily visiting a pawn shop the day after the robbery then the arson occurred on elm street, and surveillance footage shows emily visiting a pawn shop the day after the robbery, hence the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If surveillance footage shows emily visiting a pawn shop the day after the robbery then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Surveillance footage shows emily visiting a pawn shop the day after the robbery
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If surveillance footage shows emily visiting a pawn shop the day after the robbery then the arson occurred on elm street, and surveillance footage shows emily visiting a pawn shop the day after the robbery, thus the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If surveillance footage shows emily visiting a pawn shop the day after the robbery then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Surveillance footage shows emily visiting a pawn shop the day after the robbery
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If surveillance footage shows emily visiting a pawn shop the day after the robbery then the arson occurred on elm street, and surveillance footage shows emily visiting a pawn shop the day after the robbery, so it can be concluded that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If surveillance footage shows emily visiting a pawn shop the day after the robbery then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Surveillance footage shows emily visiting a pawn shop the day after the robbery
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If surveillance footage shows emily visiting a pawn shop the day after the robbery then the arson occurred on elm street, and surveillance footage shows emily visiting a pawn shop the day after the robbery, so the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If surveillance footage shows emily visiting a pawn shop the day after the robbery then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Surveillance footage shows emily visiting a pawn shop the day after the robbery
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If surveillance footage shows emily visiting a pawn shop the day after the robbery then the arson occurred on elm street, and surveillance footage shows emily visiting a pawn shop the day after the robbery, which implies that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If surveillance footage shows emily visiting a pawn shop the day after the robbery then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Surveillance footage shows emily visiting a pawn shop the day after the robbery
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If surveillance footage shows emily visiting a pawn shop the day after the robbery then the arson occurred on elm street, and surveillance footage shows emily visiting a pawn shop the day after the robbery, which shows that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If surveillance footage shows emily visiting a pawn shop the day after the robbery then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Surveillance footage shows emily visiting a pawn shop the day after the robbery
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If surveillance footage shows emily visiting a pawn shop the day after the robbery then the arson occurred on elm street, and surveillance footage shows emily visiting a pawn shop the day after the robbery, which establishes that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If surveillance footage shows emily visiting a pawn shop the day after the robbery then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Surveillance footage shows emily visiting a pawn shop the day after the robbery
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, since if surveillance footage shows emily visiting a pawn shop the day after the robbery then the arson occurred on elm street and surveillance footage shows emily visiting a pawn shop the day after the robbery.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If surveillance footage shows emily visiting a pawn shop the day after the robbery then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Surveillance footage shows emily visiting a pawn shop the day after the robbery
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, because if surveillance footage shows emily visiting a pawn shop the day after the robbery then the arson occurred on elm street and surveillance footage shows emily visiting a pawn shop the day after the robbery.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If surveillance footage shows emily visiting a pawn shop the day after the robbery then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Surveillance footage shows emily visiting a pawn shop the day after the robbery
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, as if surveillance footage shows emily visiting a pawn shop the day after the robbery then the arson occurred on elm street and surveillance footage shows emily visiting a pawn shop the day after the robbery.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If surveillance footage shows emily visiting a pawn shop the day after the robbery then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Surveillance footage shows emily visiting a pawn shop the day after the robbery
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If surveillance footage shows emily visiting a pawn shop the day after the robbery then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, therefore surveillance footage does not show emily visiting a pawn shop the day after the robbery.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If surveillance footage shows emily visiting a pawn shop the day after the robbery then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Surveillance footage does not show Emily visiting a pawn shop the day after the robbery
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If surveillance footage shows emily visiting a pawn shop the day after the robbery then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, hence surveillance footage does not show emily visiting a pawn shop the day after the robbery.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If surveillance footage shows emily visiting a pawn shop the day after the robbery then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Surveillance footage does not show Emily visiting a pawn shop the day after the robbery
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If surveillance footage shows emily visiting a pawn shop the day after the robbery then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, thus surveillance footage does not show emily visiting a pawn shop the day after the robbery.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If surveillance footage shows emily visiting a pawn shop the day after the robbery then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Surveillance footage does not show Emily visiting a pawn shop the day after the robbery
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If surveillance footage shows emily visiting a pawn shop the day after the robbery then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so it can be concluded that surveillance footage does not show emily visiting a pawn shop the day after the robbery.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If surveillance footage shows emily visiting a pawn shop the day after the robbery then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Surveillance footage does not show Emily visiting a pawn shop the day after the robbery
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If surveillance footage shows emily visiting a pawn shop the day after the robbery then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so surveillance footage does not show emily visiting a pawn shop the day after the robbery.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If surveillance footage shows emily visiting a pawn shop the day after the robbery then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Surveillance footage does not show Emily visiting a pawn shop the day after the robbery
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If surveillance footage shows emily visiting a pawn shop the day after the robbery then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which implies that surveillance footage does not show emily visiting a pawn shop the day after the robbery.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If surveillance footage shows emily visiting a pawn shop the day after the robbery then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Surveillance footage does not show Emily visiting a pawn shop the day after the robbery
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If surveillance footage shows emily visiting a pawn shop the day after the robbery then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which shows that surveillance footage does not show emily visiting a pawn shop the day after the robbery.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If surveillance footage shows emily visiting a pawn shop the day after the robbery then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Surveillance footage does not show Emily visiting a pawn shop the day after the robbery
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If surveillance footage shows emily visiting a pawn shop the day after the robbery then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which establishes that surveillance footage does not show emily visiting a pawn shop the day after the robbery.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If surveillance footage shows emily visiting a pawn shop the day after the robbery then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Surveillance footage does not show Emily visiting a pawn shop the day after the robbery
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```Surveillance footage does not show emily visiting a pawn shop the day after the robbery, since if surveillance footage shows emily visiting a pawn shop the day after the robbery then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If surveillance footage shows emily visiting a pawn shop the day after the robbery then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Surveillance footage does not show Emily visiting a pawn shop the day after the robbery
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```Surveillance footage does not show emily visiting a pawn shop the day after the robbery, because if surveillance footage shows emily visiting a pawn shop the day after the robbery then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If surveillance footage shows emily visiting a pawn shop the day after the robbery then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Surveillance footage does not show Emily visiting a pawn shop the day after the robbery
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```Surveillance footage does not show emily visiting a pawn shop the day after the robbery, as if surveillance footage shows emily visiting a pawn shop the day after the robbery then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If surveillance footage shows emily visiting a pawn shop the day after the robbery then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Surveillance footage does not show Emily visiting a pawn shop the day after the robbery
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If emily's fingerprints were found on the stolen jewels recovered from the pawn shop then the arson occurred on elm street, and emily's fingerprints were found on the stolen jewels recovered from the pawn shop, therefore the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If emily's fingerprints were found on the stolen jewels recovered from the pawn shop then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Emily's fingerprints were found on the stolen jewels recovered from the pawn shop
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If emily's fingerprints were found on the stolen jewels recovered from the pawn shop then the arson occurred on elm street, and emily's fingerprints were found on the stolen jewels recovered from the pawn shop, hence the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If emily's fingerprints were found on the stolen jewels recovered from the pawn shop then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Emily's fingerprints were found on the stolen jewels recovered from the pawn shop
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If emily's fingerprints were found on the stolen jewels recovered from the pawn shop then the arson occurred on elm street, and emily's fingerprints were found on the stolen jewels recovered from the pawn shop, thus the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If emily's fingerprints were found on the stolen jewels recovered from the pawn shop then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Emily's fingerprints were found on the stolen jewels recovered from the pawn shop
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If emily's fingerprints were found on the stolen jewels recovered from the pawn shop then the arson occurred on elm street, and emily's fingerprints were found on the stolen jewels recovered from the pawn shop, so it can be concluded that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If emily's fingerprints were found on the stolen jewels recovered from the pawn shop then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Emily's fingerprints were found on the stolen jewels recovered from the pawn shop
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If emily's fingerprints were found on the stolen jewels recovered from the pawn shop then the arson occurred on elm street, and emily's fingerprints were found on the stolen jewels recovered from the pawn shop, so the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If emily's fingerprints were found on the stolen jewels recovered from the pawn shop then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Emily's fingerprints were found on the stolen jewels recovered from the pawn shop
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If emily's fingerprints were found on the stolen jewels recovered from the pawn shop then the arson occurred on elm street, and emily's fingerprints were found on the stolen jewels recovered from the pawn shop, which implies that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If emily's fingerprints were found on the stolen jewels recovered from the pawn shop then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Emily's fingerprints were found on the stolen jewels recovered from the pawn shop
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If emily's fingerprints were found on the stolen jewels recovered from the pawn shop then the arson occurred on elm street, and emily's fingerprints were found on the stolen jewels recovered from the pawn shop, which shows that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If emily's fingerprints were found on the stolen jewels recovered from the pawn shop then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Emily's fingerprints were found on the stolen jewels recovered from the pawn shop
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If emily's fingerprints were found on the stolen jewels recovered from the pawn shop then the arson occurred on elm street, and emily's fingerprints were found on the stolen jewels recovered from the pawn shop, which establishes that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If emily's fingerprints were found on the stolen jewels recovered from the pawn shop then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Emily's fingerprints were found on the stolen jewels recovered from the pawn shop
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, since if emily's fingerprints were found on the stolen jewels recovered from the pawn shop then the arson occurred on elm street and emily's fingerprints were found on the stolen jewels recovered from the pawn shop.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If emily's fingerprints were found on the stolen jewels recovered from the pawn shop then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Emily's fingerprints were found on the stolen jewels recovered from the pawn shop
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, because if emily's fingerprints were found on the stolen jewels recovered from the pawn shop then the arson occurred on elm street and emily's fingerprints were found on the stolen jewels recovered from the pawn shop.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If emily's fingerprints were found on the stolen jewels recovered from the pawn shop then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Emily's fingerprints were found on the stolen jewels recovered from the pawn shop
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, as if emily's fingerprints were found on the stolen jewels recovered from the pawn shop then the arson occurred on elm street and emily's fingerprints were found on the stolen jewels recovered from the pawn shop.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If emily's fingerprints were found on the stolen jewels recovered from the pawn shop then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Emily's fingerprints were found on the stolen jewels recovered from the pawn shop
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.