<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street, and officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene, therefore the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
stringlengths 355
1.02k
|
|---|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```Emily's social media posts did not hint at a desire for a luxurious lifestyle, since if emily's social media posts hinted at a desire for a luxurious lifestyle then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If emily's social media posts hinted at a desire for a luxurious lifestyle then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Emily's social media posts did not hint at a desire for a luxurious lifestyle
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```Emily's social media posts did not hint at a desire for a luxurious lifestyle, because if emily's social media posts hinted at a desire for a luxurious lifestyle then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If emily's social media posts hinted at a desire for a luxurious lifestyle then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Emily's social media posts did not hint at a desire for a luxurious lifestyle
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```Emily's social media posts did not hint at a desire for a luxurious lifestyle, as if emily's social media posts hinted at a desire for a luxurious lifestyle then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If emily's social media posts hinted at a desire for a luxurious lifestyle then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Emily's social media posts did not hint at a desire for a luxurious lifestyle
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If sarah's blood was found on emily's clothing then the arson occurred on elm street, and sarah's blood was found on emily's clothing, therefore the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If sarah's blood was found on emily's clothing then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Sarah's blood was found on emily's clothing
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If sarah's blood was found on emily's clothing then the arson occurred on elm street, and sarah's blood was found on emily's clothing, hence the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If sarah's blood was found on emily's clothing then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Sarah's blood was found on emily's clothing
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If sarah's blood was found on emily's clothing then the arson occurred on elm street, and sarah's blood was found on emily's clothing, thus the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If sarah's blood was found on emily's clothing then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Sarah's blood was found on emily's clothing
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If sarah's blood was found on emily's clothing then the arson occurred on elm street, and sarah's blood was found on emily's clothing, so it can be concluded that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If sarah's blood was found on emily's clothing then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Sarah's blood was found on emily's clothing
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If sarah's blood was found on emily's clothing then the arson occurred on elm street, and sarah's blood was found on emily's clothing, so the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If sarah's blood was found on emily's clothing then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Sarah's blood was found on emily's clothing
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If sarah's blood was found on emily's clothing then the arson occurred on elm street, and sarah's blood was found on emily's clothing, which implies that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If sarah's blood was found on emily's clothing then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Sarah's blood was found on emily's clothing
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If sarah's blood was found on emily's clothing then the arson occurred on elm street, and sarah's blood was found on emily's clothing, which shows that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If sarah's blood was found on emily's clothing then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Sarah's blood was found on emily's clothing
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If sarah's blood was found on emily's clothing then the arson occurred on elm street, and sarah's blood was found on emily's clothing, which establishes that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If sarah's blood was found on emily's clothing then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Sarah's blood was found on emily's clothing
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, since if sarah's blood was found on emily's clothing then the arson occurred on elm street and sarah's blood was found on emily's clothing.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If sarah's blood was found on emily's clothing then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Sarah's blood was found on emily's clothing
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, because if sarah's blood was found on emily's clothing then the arson occurred on elm street and sarah's blood was found on emily's clothing.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If sarah's blood was found on emily's clothing then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Sarah's blood was found on emily's clothing
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, as if sarah's blood was found on emily's clothing then the arson occurred on elm street and sarah's blood was found on emily's clothing.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If sarah's blood was found on emily's clothing then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Sarah's blood was found on emily's clothing
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If sarah's blood was found on emily's clothing then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, therefore sarah's blood was not found on emily's clothing.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If sarah's blood was found on emily's clothing then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Sarah's blood was not found on Emily's clothing
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If sarah's blood was found on emily's clothing then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, hence sarah's blood was not found on emily's clothing.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If sarah's blood was found on emily's clothing then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Sarah's blood was not found on Emily's clothing
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If sarah's blood was found on emily's clothing then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, thus sarah's blood was not found on emily's clothing.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If sarah's blood was found on emily's clothing then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Sarah's blood was not found on Emily's clothing
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If sarah's blood was found on emily's clothing then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so it can be concluded that sarah's blood was not found on emily's clothing.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If sarah's blood was found on emily's clothing then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Sarah's blood was not found on Emily's clothing
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If sarah's blood was found on emily's clothing then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so sarah's blood was not found on emily's clothing.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If sarah's blood was found on emily's clothing then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Sarah's blood was not found on Emily's clothing
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If sarah's blood was found on emily's clothing then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which implies that sarah's blood was not found on emily's clothing.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If sarah's blood was found on emily's clothing then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Sarah's blood was not found on Emily's clothing
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If sarah's blood was found on emily's clothing then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which shows that sarah's blood was not found on emily's clothing.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If sarah's blood was found on emily's clothing then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Sarah's blood was not found on Emily's clothing
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If sarah's blood was found on emily's clothing then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which establishes that sarah's blood was not found on emily's clothing.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If sarah's blood was found on emily's clothing then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Sarah's blood was not found on Emily's clothing
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```Sarah's blood was not found on emily's clothing, since if sarah's blood was found on emily's clothing then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If sarah's blood was found on emily's clothing then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Sarah's blood was not found on Emily's clothing
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```Sarah's blood was not found on emily's clothing, because if sarah's blood was found on emily's clothing then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If sarah's blood was found on emily's clothing then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Sarah's blood was not found on Emily's clothing
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```Sarah's blood was not found on emily's clothing, as if sarah's blood was found on emily's clothing then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If sarah's blood was found on emily's clothing then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Sarah's blood was not found on Emily's clothing
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a stolen bracelet was recovered from a pawn shop with emily's id then the arson occurred on elm street, and a stolen bracelet was recovered from a pawn shop with emily's id, therefore the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a stolen bracelet was recovered from a pawn shop with emily's id then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: A stolen bracelet was recovered from a pawn shop with emily's id
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a stolen bracelet was recovered from a pawn shop with emily's id then the arson occurred on elm street, and a stolen bracelet was recovered from a pawn shop with emily's id, hence the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a stolen bracelet was recovered from a pawn shop with emily's id then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: A stolen bracelet was recovered from a pawn shop with emily's id
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a stolen bracelet was recovered from a pawn shop with emily's id then the arson occurred on elm street, and a stolen bracelet was recovered from a pawn shop with emily's id, thus the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a stolen bracelet was recovered from a pawn shop with emily's id then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: A stolen bracelet was recovered from a pawn shop with emily's id
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a stolen bracelet was recovered from a pawn shop with emily's id then the arson occurred on elm street, and a stolen bracelet was recovered from a pawn shop with emily's id, so it can be concluded that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a stolen bracelet was recovered from a pawn shop with emily's id then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: A stolen bracelet was recovered from a pawn shop with emily's id
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a stolen bracelet was recovered from a pawn shop with emily's id then the arson occurred on elm street, and a stolen bracelet was recovered from a pawn shop with emily's id, so the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a stolen bracelet was recovered from a pawn shop with emily's id then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: A stolen bracelet was recovered from a pawn shop with emily's id
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a stolen bracelet was recovered from a pawn shop with emily's id then the arson occurred on elm street, and a stolen bracelet was recovered from a pawn shop with emily's id, which implies that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a stolen bracelet was recovered from a pawn shop with emily's id then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: A stolen bracelet was recovered from a pawn shop with emily's id
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a stolen bracelet was recovered from a pawn shop with emily's id then the arson occurred on elm street, and a stolen bracelet was recovered from a pawn shop with emily's id, which shows that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a stolen bracelet was recovered from a pawn shop with emily's id then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: A stolen bracelet was recovered from a pawn shop with emily's id
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a stolen bracelet was recovered from a pawn shop with emily's id then the arson occurred on elm street, and a stolen bracelet was recovered from a pawn shop with emily's id, which establishes that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a stolen bracelet was recovered from a pawn shop with emily's id then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: A stolen bracelet was recovered from a pawn shop with emily's id
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, since if a stolen bracelet was recovered from a pawn shop with emily's id then the arson occurred on elm street and a stolen bracelet was recovered from a pawn shop with emily's id.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a stolen bracelet was recovered from a pawn shop with emily's id then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: A stolen bracelet was recovered from a pawn shop with emily's id
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, because if a stolen bracelet was recovered from a pawn shop with emily's id then the arson occurred on elm street and a stolen bracelet was recovered from a pawn shop with emily's id.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a stolen bracelet was recovered from a pawn shop with emily's id then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: A stolen bracelet was recovered from a pawn shop with emily's id
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, as if a stolen bracelet was recovered from a pawn shop with emily's id then the arson occurred on elm street and a stolen bracelet was recovered from a pawn shop with emily's id.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a stolen bracelet was recovered from a pawn shop with emily's id then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: A stolen bracelet was recovered from a pawn shop with emily's id
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a stolen bracelet was recovered from a pawn shop with emily's id then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, therefore no stolen bracelet was recovered from a pawn shop with emily's id.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a stolen bracelet was recovered from a pawn shop with emily's id then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: No stolen bracelet was recovered from a pawn shop with Emily's ID
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a stolen bracelet was recovered from a pawn shop with emily's id then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, hence no stolen bracelet was recovered from a pawn shop with emily's id.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a stolen bracelet was recovered from a pawn shop with emily's id then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: No stolen bracelet was recovered from a pawn shop with Emily's ID
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a stolen bracelet was recovered from a pawn shop with emily's id then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, thus no stolen bracelet was recovered from a pawn shop with emily's id.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a stolen bracelet was recovered from a pawn shop with emily's id then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: No stolen bracelet was recovered from a pawn shop with Emily's ID
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a stolen bracelet was recovered from a pawn shop with emily's id then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so it can be concluded that no stolen bracelet was recovered from a pawn shop with emily's id.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a stolen bracelet was recovered from a pawn shop with emily's id then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: No stolen bracelet was recovered from a pawn shop with Emily's ID
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a stolen bracelet was recovered from a pawn shop with emily's id then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so no stolen bracelet was recovered from a pawn shop with emily's id.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a stolen bracelet was recovered from a pawn shop with emily's id then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: No stolen bracelet was recovered from a pawn shop with Emily's ID
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a stolen bracelet was recovered from a pawn shop with emily's id then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which implies that no stolen bracelet was recovered from a pawn shop with emily's id.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a stolen bracelet was recovered from a pawn shop with emily's id then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: No stolen bracelet was recovered from a pawn shop with Emily's ID
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a stolen bracelet was recovered from a pawn shop with emily's id then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which shows that no stolen bracelet was recovered from a pawn shop with emily's id.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a stolen bracelet was recovered from a pawn shop with emily's id then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: No stolen bracelet was recovered from a pawn shop with Emily's ID
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a stolen bracelet was recovered from a pawn shop with emily's id then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which establishes that no stolen bracelet was recovered from a pawn shop with emily's id.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a stolen bracelet was recovered from a pawn shop with emily's id then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: No stolen bracelet was recovered from a pawn shop with Emily's ID
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```No stolen bracelet was recovered from a pawn shop with emily's id, since if a stolen bracelet was recovered from a pawn shop with emily's id then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a stolen bracelet was recovered from a pawn shop with emily's id then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: No stolen bracelet was recovered from a pawn shop with Emily's ID
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```No stolen bracelet was recovered from a pawn shop with emily's id, because if a stolen bracelet was recovered from a pawn shop with emily's id then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a stolen bracelet was recovered from a pawn shop with emily's id then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: No stolen bracelet was recovered from a pawn shop with Emily's ID
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```No stolen bracelet was recovered from a pawn shop with emily's id, as if a stolen bracelet was recovered from a pawn shop with emily's id then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a stolen bracelet was recovered from a pawn shop with emily's id then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: No stolen bracelet was recovered from a pawn shop with Emily's ID
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If surveillance footage shows a figure in a clown mask disposing of evidence in a river then the arson occurred on elm street, and surveillance footage shows a figure in a clown mask disposing of evidence in a river, therefore the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If surveillance footage shows a figure in a clown mask disposing of evidence in a river then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Surveillance footage shows a figure in a clown mask disposing of evidence in a river
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If surveillance footage shows a figure in a clown mask disposing of evidence in a river then the arson occurred on elm street, and surveillance footage shows a figure in a clown mask disposing of evidence in a river, hence the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If surveillance footage shows a figure in a clown mask disposing of evidence in a river then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Surveillance footage shows a figure in a clown mask disposing of evidence in a river
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If surveillance footage shows a figure in a clown mask disposing of evidence in a river then the arson occurred on elm street, and surveillance footage shows a figure in a clown mask disposing of evidence in a river, thus the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If surveillance footage shows a figure in a clown mask disposing of evidence in a river then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Surveillance footage shows a figure in a clown mask disposing of evidence in a river
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If surveillance footage shows a figure in a clown mask disposing of evidence in a river then the arson occurred on elm street, and surveillance footage shows a figure in a clown mask disposing of evidence in a river, so it can be concluded that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If surveillance footage shows a figure in a clown mask disposing of evidence in a river then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Surveillance footage shows a figure in a clown mask disposing of evidence in a river
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If surveillance footage shows a figure in a clown mask disposing of evidence in a river then the arson occurred on elm street, and surveillance footage shows a figure in a clown mask disposing of evidence in a river, so the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If surveillance footage shows a figure in a clown mask disposing of evidence in a river then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Surveillance footage shows a figure in a clown mask disposing of evidence in a river
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If surveillance footage shows a figure in a clown mask disposing of evidence in a river then the arson occurred on elm street, and surveillance footage shows a figure in a clown mask disposing of evidence in a river, which implies that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If surveillance footage shows a figure in a clown mask disposing of evidence in a river then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Surveillance footage shows a figure in a clown mask disposing of evidence in a river
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If surveillance footage shows a figure in a clown mask disposing of evidence in a river then the arson occurred on elm street, and surveillance footage shows a figure in a clown mask disposing of evidence in a river, which shows that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If surveillance footage shows a figure in a clown mask disposing of evidence in a river then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Surveillance footage shows a figure in a clown mask disposing of evidence in a river
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If surveillance footage shows a figure in a clown mask disposing of evidence in a river then the arson occurred on elm street, and surveillance footage shows a figure in a clown mask disposing of evidence in a river, which establishes that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If surveillance footage shows a figure in a clown mask disposing of evidence in a river then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Surveillance footage shows a figure in a clown mask disposing of evidence in a river
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, since if surveillance footage shows a figure in a clown mask disposing of evidence in a river then the arson occurred on elm street and surveillance footage shows a figure in a clown mask disposing of evidence in a river.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If surveillance footage shows a figure in a clown mask disposing of evidence in a river then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Surveillance footage shows a figure in a clown mask disposing of evidence in a river
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, because if surveillance footage shows a figure in a clown mask disposing of evidence in a river then the arson occurred on elm street and surveillance footage shows a figure in a clown mask disposing of evidence in a river.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If surveillance footage shows a figure in a clown mask disposing of evidence in a river then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Surveillance footage shows a figure in a clown mask disposing of evidence in a river
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, as if surveillance footage shows a figure in a clown mask disposing of evidence in a river then the arson occurred on elm street and surveillance footage shows a figure in a clown mask disposing of evidence in a river.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If surveillance footage shows a figure in a clown mask disposing of evidence in a river then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Surveillance footage shows a figure in a clown mask disposing of evidence in a river
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If surveillance footage shows a figure in a clown mask disposing of evidence in a river then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, therefore surveillance footage does not show a figure in a clown mask disposing of evidence in a river.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If surveillance footage shows a figure in a clown mask disposing of evidence in a river then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Surveillance footage does not show a figure in a clown mask disposing of evidence in a river
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If surveillance footage shows a figure in a clown mask disposing of evidence in a river then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, hence surveillance footage does not show a figure in a clown mask disposing of evidence in a river.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If surveillance footage shows a figure in a clown mask disposing of evidence in a river then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Surveillance footage does not show a figure in a clown mask disposing of evidence in a river
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If surveillance footage shows a figure in a clown mask disposing of evidence in a river then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, thus surveillance footage does not show a figure in a clown mask disposing of evidence in a river.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If surveillance footage shows a figure in a clown mask disposing of evidence in a river then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Surveillance footage does not show a figure in a clown mask disposing of evidence in a river
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If surveillance footage shows a figure in a clown mask disposing of evidence in a river then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so it can be concluded that surveillance footage does not show a figure in a clown mask disposing of evidence in a river.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If surveillance footage shows a figure in a clown mask disposing of evidence in a river then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Surveillance footage does not show a figure in a clown mask disposing of evidence in a river
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If surveillance footage shows a figure in a clown mask disposing of evidence in a river then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so surveillance footage does not show a figure in a clown mask disposing of evidence in a river.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If surveillance footage shows a figure in a clown mask disposing of evidence in a river then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Surveillance footage does not show a figure in a clown mask disposing of evidence in a river
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If surveillance footage shows a figure in a clown mask disposing of evidence in a river then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which implies that surveillance footage does not show a figure in a clown mask disposing of evidence in a river.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If surveillance footage shows a figure in a clown mask disposing of evidence in a river then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Surveillance footage does not show a figure in a clown mask disposing of evidence in a river
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If surveillance footage shows a figure in a clown mask disposing of evidence in a river then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which shows that surveillance footage does not show a figure in a clown mask disposing of evidence in a river.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If surveillance footage shows a figure in a clown mask disposing of evidence in a river then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Surveillance footage does not show a figure in a clown mask disposing of evidence in a river
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If surveillance footage shows a figure in a clown mask disposing of evidence in a river then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which establishes that surveillance footage does not show a figure in a clown mask disposing of evidence in a river.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If surveillance footage shows a figure in a clown mask disposing of evidence in a river then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Surveillance footage does not show a figure in a clown mask disposing of evidence in a river
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```Surveillance footage does not show a figure in a clown mask disposing of evidence in a river, since if surveillance footage shows a figure in a clown mask disposing of evidence in a river then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If surveillance footage shows a figure in a clown mask disposing of evidence in a river then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Surveillance footage does not show a figure in a clown mask disposing of evidence in a river
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```Surveillance footage does not show a figure in a clown mask disposing of evidence in a river, because if surveillance footage shows a figure in a clown mask disposing of evidence in a river then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If surveillance footage shows a figure in a clown mask disposing of evidence in a river then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Surveillance footage does not show a figure in a clown mask disposing of evidence in a river
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```Surveillance footage does not show a figure in a clown mask disposing of evidence in a river, as if surveillance footage shows a figure in a clown mask disposing of evidence in a river then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If surveillance footage shows a figure in a clown mask disposing of evidence in a river then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Surveillance footage does not show a figure in a clown mask disposing of evidence in a river
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If emily's neighbor reported hearing a loud argument on the night of the murder then the arson occurred on elm street, and emily's neighbor reported hearing a loud argument on the night of the murder, therefore the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If emily's neighbor reported hearing a loud argument on the night of the murder then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Emily's neighbor reported hearing a loud argument on the night of the murder
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If emily's neighbor reported hearing a loud argument on the night of the murder then the arson occurred on elm street, and emily's neighbor reported hearing a loud argument on the night of the murder, hence the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If emily's neighbor reported hearing a loud argument on the night of the murder then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Emily's neighbor reported hearing a loud argument on the night of the murder
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If emily's neighbor reported hearing a loud argument on the night of the murder then the arson occurred on elm street, and emily's neighbor reported hearing a loud argument on the night of the murder, thus the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If emily's neighbor reported hearing a loud argument on the night of the murder then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Emily's neighbor reported hearing a loud argument on the night of the murder
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If emily's neighbor reported hearing a loud argument on the night of the murder then the arson occurred on elm street, and emily's neighbor reported hearing a loud argument on the night of the murder, so it can be concluded that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If emily's neighbor reported hearing a loud argument on the night of the murder then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Emily's neighbor reported hearing a loud argument on the night of the murder
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If emily's neighbor reported hearing a loud argument on the night of the murder then the arson occurred on elm street, and emily's neighbor reported hearing a loud argument on the night of the murder, so the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If emily's neighbor reported hearing a loud argument on the night of the murder then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Emily's neighbor reported hearing a loud argument on the night of the murder
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If emily's neighbor reported hearing a loud argument on the night of the murder then the arson occurred on elm street, and emily's neighbor reported hearing a loud argument on the night of the murder, which implies that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If emily's neighbor reported hearing a loud argument on the night of the murder then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Emily's neighbor reported hearing a loud argument on the night of the murder
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If emily's neighbor reported hearing a loud argument on the night of the murder then the arson occurred on elm street, and emily's neighbor reported hearing a loud argument on the night of the murder, which shows that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If emily's neighbor reported hearing a loud argument on the night of the murder then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Emily's neighbor reported hearing a loud argument on the night of the murder
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If emily's neighbor reported hearing a loud argument on the night of the murder then the arson occurred on elm street, and emily's neighbor reported hearing a loud argument on the night of the murder, which establishes that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If emily's neighbor reported hearing a loud argument on the night of the murder then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Emily's neighbor reported hearing a loud argument on the night of the murder
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, since if emily's neighbor reported hearing a loud argument on the night of the murder then the arson occurred on elm street and emily's neighbor reported hearing a loud argument on the night of the murder.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If emily's neighbor reported hearing a loud argument on the night of the murder then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Emily's neighbor reported hearing a loud argument on the night of the murder
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, because if emily's neighbor reported hearing a loud argument on the night of the murder then the arson occurred on elm street and emily's neighbor reported hearing a loud argument on the night of the murder.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If emily's neighbor reported hearing a loud argument on the night of the murder then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Emily's neighbor reported hearing a loud argument on the night of the murder
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, as if emily's neighbor reported hearing a loud argument on the night of the murder then the arson occurred on elm street and emily's neighbor reported hearing a loud argument on the night of the murder.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If emily's neighbor reported hearing a loud argument on the night of the murder then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Emily's neighbor reported hearing a loud argument on the night of the murder
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If emily's neighbor reported hearing a loud argument on the night of the murder then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, therefore emily's neighbor did not report hearing a loud argument on the night of the murder.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If emily's neighbor reported hearing a loud argument on the night of the murder then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Emily's neighbor did not report hearing a loud argument on the night of the murder
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If emily's neighbor reported hearing a loud argument on the night of the murder then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, hence emily's neighbor did not report hearing a loud argument on the night of the murder.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If emily's neighbor reported hearing a loud argument on the night of the murder then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Emily's neighbor did not report hearing a loud argument on the night of the murder
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If emily's neighbor reported hearing a loud argument on the night of the murder then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, thus emily's neighbor did not report hearing a loud argument on the night of the murder.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If emily's neighbor reported hearing a loud argument on the night of the murder then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Emily's neighbor did not report hearing a loud argument on the night of the murder
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If emily's neighbor reported hearing a loud argument on the night of the murder then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so it can be concluded that emily's neighbor did not report hearing a loud argument on the night of the murder.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If emily's neighbor reported hearing a loud argument on the night of the murder then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Emily's neighbor did not report hearing a loud argument on the night of the murder
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If emily's neighbor reported hearing a loud argument on the night of the murder then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so emily's neighbor did not report hearing a loud argument on the night of the murder.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If emily's neighbor reported hearing a loud argument on the night of the murder then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Emily's neighbor did not report hearing a loud argument on the night of the murder
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If emily's neighbor reported hearing a loud argument on the night of the murder then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which implies that emily's neighbor did not report hearing a loud argument on the night of the murder.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If emily's neighbor reported hearing a loud argument on the night of the murder then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Emily's neighbor did not report hearing a loud argument on the night of the murder
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If emily's neighbor reported hearing a loud argument on the night of the murder then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which shows that emily's neighbor did not report hearing a loud argument on the night of the murder.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If emily's neighbor reported hearing a loud argument on the night of the murder then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Emily's neighbor did not report hearing a loud argument on the night of the murder
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If emily's neighbor reported hearing a loud argument on the night of the murder then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which establishes that emily's neighbor did not report hearing a loud argument on the night of the murder.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If emily's neighbor reported hearing a loud argument on the night of the murder then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Emily's neighbor did not report hearing a loud argument on the night of the murder
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```Emily's neighbor did not report hearing a loud argument on the night of the murder, since if emily's neighbor reported hearing a loud argument on the night of the murder then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If emily's neighbor reported hearing a loud argument on the night of the murder then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Emily's neighbor did not report hearing a loud argument on the night of the murder
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```Emily's neighbor did not report hearing a loud argument on the night of the murder, because if emily's neighbor reported hearing a loud argument on the night of the murder then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If emily's neighbor reported hearing a loud argument on the night of the murder then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Emily's neighbor did not report hearing a loud argument on the night of the murder
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```Emily's neighbor did not report hearing a loud argument on the night of the murder, as if emily's neighbor reported hearing a loud argument on the night of the murder then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If emily's neighbor reported hearing a loud argument on the night of the murder then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Emily's neighbor did not report hearing a loud argument on the night of the murder
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a map with the jewelry store's layout was found in emily's home then the arson occurred on elm street, and a map with the jewelry store's layout was found in emily's home, therefore the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a map with the jewelry store's layout was found in emily's home then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: A map with the jewelry store's layout was found in emily's home
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a map with the jewelry store's layout was found in emily's home then the arson occurred on elm street, and a map with the jewelry store's layout was found in emily's home, hence the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a map with the jewelry store's layout was found in emily's home then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: A map with the jewelry store's layout was found in emily's home
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a map with the jewelry store's layout was found in emily's home then the arson occurred on elm street, and a map with the jewelry store's layout was found in emily's home, thus the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a map with the jewelry store's layout was found in emily's home then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: A map with the jewelry store's layout was found in emily's home
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a map with the jewelry store's layout was found in emily's home then the arson occurred on elm street, and a map with the jewelry store's layout was found in emily's home, so it can be concluded that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a map with the jewelry store's layout was found in emily's home then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: A map with the jewelry store's layout was found in emily's home
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a map with the jewelry store's layout was found in emily's home then the arson occurred on elm street, and a map with the jewelry store's layout was found in emily's home, so the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a map with the jewelry store's layout was found in emily's home then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: A map with the jewelry store's layout was found in emily's home
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a map with the jewelry store's layout was found in emily's home then the arson occurred on elm street, and a map with the jewelry store's layout was found in emily's home, which implies that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a map with the jewelry store's layout was found in emily's home then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: A map with the jewelry store's layout was found in emily's home
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a map with the jewelry store's layout was found in emily's home then the arson occurred on elm street, and a map with the jewelry store's layout was found in emily's home, which shows that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a map with the jewelry store's layout was found in emily's home then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: A map with the jewelry store's layout was found in emily's home
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a map with the jewelry store's layout was found in emily's home then the arson occurred on elm street, and a map with the jewelry store's layout was found in emily's home, which establishes that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a map with the jewelry store's layout was found in emily's home then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: A map with the jewelry store's layout was found in emily's home
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, since if a map with the jewelry store's layout was found in emily's home then the arson occurred on elm street and a map with the jewelry store's layout was found in emily's home.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a map with the jewelry store's layout was found in emily's home then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: A map with the jewelry store's layout was found in emily's home
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.