<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street, and officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene, therefore the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
stringlengths 355
1.02k
|
|---|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the book is written by a famous author then the arson occurred on elm street, and the book is written by a famous author, hence the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the book is written by a famous author then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The book is written by a famous author
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the book is written by a famous author then the arson occurred on elm street, and the book is written by a famous author, thus the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the book is written by a famous author then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The book is written by a famous author
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the book is written by a famous author then the arson occurred on elm street, and the book is written by a famous author, so it can be concluded that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the book is written by a famous author then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The book is written by a famous author
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the book is written by a famous author then the arson occurred on elm street, and the book is written by a famous author, so the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the book is written by a famous author then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The book is written by a famous author
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the book is written by a famous author then the arson occurred on elm street, and the book is written by a famous author, which implies that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the book is written by a famous author then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The book is written by a famous author
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the book is written by a famous author then the arson occurred on elm street, and the book is written by a famous author, which shows that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the book is written by a famous author then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The book is written by a famous author
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the book is written by a famous author then the arson occurred on elm street, and the book is written by a famous author, which establishes that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the book is written by a famous author then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The book is written by a famous author
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, since if the book is written by a famous author then the arson occurred on elm street and the book is written by a famous author.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the book is written by a famous author then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The book is written by a famous author
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, because if the book is written by a famous author then the arson occurred on elm street and the book is written by a famous author.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the book is written by a famous author then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The book is written by a famous author
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, as if the book is written by a famous author then the arson occurred on elm street and the book is written by a famous author.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the book is written by a famous author then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The book is written by a famous author
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the book is written by a famous author then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, therefore the book is not written by a famous author.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the book is written by a famous author then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The book is not written by a famous author
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the book is written by a famous author then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, hence the book is not written by a famous author.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the book is written by a famous author then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The book is not written by a famous author
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the book is written by a famous author then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, thus the book is not written by a famous author.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the book is written by a famous author then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The book is not written by a famous author
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the book is written by a famous author then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so it can be concluded that the book is not written by a famous author.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the book is written by a famous author then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The book is not written by a famous author
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the book is written by a famous author then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so the book is not written by a famous author.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the book is written by a famous author then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The book is not written by a famous author
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the book is written by a famous author then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which implies that the book is not written by a famous author.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the book is written by a famous author then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The book is not written by a famous author
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the book is written by a famous author then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which shows that the book is not written by a famous author.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the book is written by a famous author then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The book is not written by a famous author
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the book is written by a famous author then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which establishes that the book is not written by a famous author.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the book is written by a famous author then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The book is not written by a famous author
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The book is not written by a famous author, since if the book is written by a famous author then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the book is written by a famous author then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The book is not written by a famous author
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The book is not written by a famous author, because if the book is written by a famous author then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the book is written by a famous author then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The book is not written by a famous author
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The book is not written by a famous author, as if the book is written by a famous author then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the book is written by a famous author then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The book is not written by a famous author
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the movie is a drama then the arson occurred on elm street, and the movie is a drama, therefore the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the movie is a drama then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The movie is a drama
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the movie is a drama then the arson occurred on elm street, and the movie is a drama, hence the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the movie is a drama then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The movie is a drama
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the movie is a drama then the arson occurred on elm street, and the movie is a drama, thus the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the movie is a drama then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The movie is a drama
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the movie is a drama then the arson occurred on elm street, and the movie is a drama, so it can be concluded that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the movie is a drama then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The movie is a drama
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the movie is a drama then the arson occurred on elm street, and the movie is a drama, so the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the movie is a drama then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The movie is a drama
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the movie is a drama then the arson occurred on elm street, and the movie is a drama, which implies that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the movie is a drama then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The movie is a drama
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the movie is a drama then the arson occurred on elm street, and the movie is a drama, which shows that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the movie is a drama then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The movie is a drama
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the movie is a drama then the arson occurred on elm street, and the movie is a drama, which establishes that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the movie is a drama then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The movie is a drama
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, since if the movie is a drama then the arson occurred on elm street and the movie is a drama.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the movie is a drama then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The movie is a drama
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, because if the movie is a drama then the arson occurred on elm street and the movie is a drama.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the movie is a drama then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The movie is a drama
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, as if the movie is a drama then the arson occurred on elm street and the movie is a drama.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the movie is a drama then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The movie is a drama
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the movie is a drama then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, therefore the movie is not a drama.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the movie is a drama then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The movie is not a drama
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the movie is a drama then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, hence the movie is not a drama.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the movie is a drama then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The movie is not a drama
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the movie is a drama then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, thus the movie is not a drama.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the movie is a drama then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The movie is not a drama
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the movie is a drama then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so it can be concluded that the movie is not a drama.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the movie is a drama then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The movie is not a drama
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the movie is a drama then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so the movie is not a drama.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the movie is a drama then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The movie is not a drama
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the movie is a drama then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which implies that the movie is not a drama.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the movie is a drama then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The movie is not a drama
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the movie is a drama then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which shows that the movie is not a drama.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the movie is a drama then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The movie is not a drama
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the movie is a drama then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which establishes that the movie is not a drama.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the movie is a drama then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The movie is not a drama
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The movie is not a drama, since if the movie is a drama then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the movie is a drama then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The movie is not a drama
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The movie is not a drama, because if the movie is a drama then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the movie is a drama then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The movie is not a drama
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The movie is not a drama, as if the movie is a drama then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the movie is a drama then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The movie is not a drama
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the weather is mild and pleasant then the arson occurred on elm street, and the weather is mild and pleasant, therefore the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the weather is mild and pleasant then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The weather is mild and pleasant
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the weather is mild and pleasant then the arson occurred on elm street, and the weather is mild and pleasant, hence the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the weather is mild and pleasant then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The weather is mild and pleasant
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the weather is mild and pleasant then the arson occurred on elm street, and the weather is mild and pleasant, thus the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the weather is mild and pleasant then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The weather is mild and pleasant
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the weather is mild and pleasant then the arson occurred on elm street, and the weather is mild and pleasant, so it can be concluded that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the weather is mild and pleasant then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The weather is mild and pleasant
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the weather is mild and pleasant then the arson occurred on elm street, and the weather is mild and pleasant, so the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the weather is mild and pleasant then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The weather is mild and pleasant
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the weather is mild and pleasant then the arson occurred on elm street, and the weather is mild and pleasant, which implies that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the weather is mild and pleasant then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The weather is mild and pleasant
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the weather is mild and pleasant then the arson occurred on elm street, and the weather is mild and pleasant, which shows that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the weather is mild and pleasant then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The weather is mild and pleasant
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the weather is mild and pleasant then the arson occurred on elm street, and the weather is mild and pleasant, which establishes that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the weather is mild and pleasant then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The weather is mild and pleasant
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, since if the weather is mild and pleasant then the arson occurred on elm street and the weather is mild and pleasant.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the weather is mild and pleasant then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The weather is mild and pleasant
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, because if the weather is mild and pleasant then the arson occurred on elm street and the weather is mild and pleasant.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the weather is mild and pleasant then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The weather is mild and pleasant
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, as if the weather is mild and pleasant then the arson occurred on elm street and the weather is mild and pleasant.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the weather is mild and pleasant then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The weather is mild and pleasant
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the weather is mild and pleasant then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, therefore the weather is not mild and pleasant.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the weather is mild and pleasant then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The weather is not mild and pleasant
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the weather is mild and pleasant then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, hence the weather is not mild and pleasant.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the weather is mild and pleasant then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The weather is not mild and pleasant
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the weather is mild and pleasant then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, thus the weather is not mild and pleasant.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the weather is mild and pleasant then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The weather is not mild and pleasant
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the weather is mild and pleasant then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so it can be concluded that the weather is not mild and pleasant.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the weather is mild and pleasant then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The weather is not mild and pleasant
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the weather is mild and pleasant then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so the weather is not mild and pleasant.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the weather is mild and pleasant then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The weather is not mild and pleasant
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the weather is mild and pleasant then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which implies that the weather is not mild and pleasant.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the weather is mild and pleasant then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The weather is not mild and pleasant
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the weather is mild and pleasant then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which shows that the weather is not mild and pleasant.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the weather is mild and pleasant then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The weather is not mild and pleasant
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the weather is mild and pleasant then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which establishes that the weather is not mild and pleasant.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the weather is mild and pleasant then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The weather is not mild and pleasant
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The weather is not mild and pleasant, since if the weather is mild and pleasant then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the weather is mild and pleasant then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The weather is not mild and pleasant
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The weather is not mild and pleasant, because if the weather is mild and pleasant then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the weather is mild and pleasant then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The weather is not mild and pleasant
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The weather is not mild and pleasant, as if the weather is mild and pleasant then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the weather is mild and pleasant then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The weather is not mild and pleasant
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the baby is crying in the car then the arson occurred on elm street, and the baby is crying in the car, therefore the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is crying in the car then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The baby is crying in the car
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the baby is crying in the car then the arson occurred on elm street, and the baby is crying in the car, hence the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is crying in the car then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The baby is crying in the car
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the baby is crying in the car then the arson occurred on elm street, and the baby is crying in the car, thus the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is crying in the car then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The baby is crying in the car
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the baby is crying in the car then the arson occurred on elm street, and the baby is crying in the car, so it can be concluded that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is crying in the car then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The baby is crying in the car
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the baby is crying in the car then the arson occurred on elm street, and the baby is crying in the car, so the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is crying in the car then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The baby is crying in the car
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the baby is crying in the car then the arson occurred on elm street, and the baby is crying in the car, which implies that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is crying in the car then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The baby is crying in the car
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the baby is crying in the car then the arson occurred on elm street, and the baby is crying in the car, which shows that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is crying in the car then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The baby is crying in the car
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the baby is crying in the car then the arson occurred on elm street, and the baby is crying in the car, which establishes that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is crying in the car then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The baby is crying in the car
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, since if the baby is crying in the car then the arson occurred on elm street and the baby is crying in the car.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is crying in the car then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The baby is crying in the car
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, because if the baby is crying in the car then the arson occurred on elm street and the baby is crying in the car.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is crying in the car then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The baby is crying in the car
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, as if the baby is crying in the car then the arson occurred on elm street and the baby is crying in the car.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is crying in the car then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The baby is crying in the car
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the baby is crying in the car then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, therefore the baby is not crying in the car.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is crying in the car then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The baby is not crying in the car
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the baby is crying in the car then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, hence the baby is not crying in the car.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is crying in the car then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The baby is not crying in the car
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the baby is crying in the car then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, thus the baby is not crying in the car.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is crying in the car then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The baby is not crying in the car
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the baby is crying in the car then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so it can be concluded that the baby is not crying in the car.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is crying in the car then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The baby is not crying in the car
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the baby is crying in the car then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so the baby is not crying in the car.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is crying in the car then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The baby is not crying in the car
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the baby is crying in the car then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which implies that the baby is not crying in the car.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is crying in the car then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The baby is not crying in the car
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the baby is crying in the car then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which shows that the baby is not crying in the car.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is crying in the car then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The baby is not crying in the car
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the baby is crying in the car then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which establishes that the baby is not crying in the car.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is crying in the car then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The baby is not crying in the car
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The baby is not crying in the car, since if the baby is crying in the car then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is crying in the car then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The baby is not crying in the car
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The baby is not crying in the car, because if the baby is crying in the car then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is crying in the car then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The baby is not crying in the car
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The baby is not crying in the car, as if the baby is crying in the car then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the baby is crying in the car then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The baby is not crying in the car
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the dog is barking at the squirrel then the arson occurred on elm street, and the dog is barking at the squirrel, therefore the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the dog is barking at the squirrel then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The dog is barking at the squirrel
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the dog is barking at the squirrel then the arson occurred on elm street, and the dog is barking at the squirrel, hence the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the dog is barking at the squirrel then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The dog is barking at the squirrel
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the dog is barking at the squirrel then the arson occurred on elm street, and the dog is barking at the squirrel, thus the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the dog is barking at the squirrel then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The dog is barking at the squirrel
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the dog is barking at the squirrel then the arson occurred on elm street, and the dog is barking at the squirrel, so it can be concluded that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the dog is barking at the squirrel then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The dog is barking at the squirrel
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the dog is barking at the squirrel then the arson occurred on elm street, and the dog is barking at the squirrel, so the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the dog is barking at the squirrel then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The dog is barking at the squirrel
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the dog is barking at the squirrel then the arson occurred on elm street, and the dog is barking at the squirrel, which implies that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the dog is barking at the squirrel then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The dog is barking at the squirrel
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the dog is barking at the squirrel then the arson occurred on elm street, and the dog is barking at the squirrel, which shows that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the dog is barking at the squirrel then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The dog is barking at the squirrel
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the dog is barking at the squirrel then the arson occurred on elm street, and the dog is barking at the squirrel, which establishes that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the dog is barking at the squirrel then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The dog is barking at the squirrel
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, since if the dog is barking at the squirrel then the arson occurred on elm street and the dog is barking at the squirrel.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the dog is barking at the squirrel then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The dog is barking at the squirrel
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, because if the dog is barking at the squirrel then the arson occurred on elm street and the dog is barking at the squirrel.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the dog is barking at the squirrel then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The dog is barking at the squirrel
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, as if the dog is barking at the squirrel then the arson occurred on elm street and the dog is barking at the squirrel.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the dog is barking at the squirrel then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The dog is barking at the squirrel
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the dog is barking at the squirrel then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, therefore the dog is not barking at the squirrel.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the dog is barking at the squirrel then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The dog is not barking at the squirrel
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the dog is barking at the squirrel then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, hence the dog is not barking at the squirrel.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the dog is barking at the squirrel then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The dog is not barking at the squirrel
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.