<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street, and officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene, therefore the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
stringlengths 355
1.02k
|
|---|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a mysterious note with cryptic symbols was discovered at the scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, therefore no mysterious note with cryptic symbols was discovered at the scene.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a mysterious note with cryptic symbols was discovered at the scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: No mysterious note with cryptic symbols was discovered at the scene
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a mysterious note with cryptic symbols was discovered at the scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, hence no mysterious note with cryptic symbols was discovered at the scene.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a mysterious note with cryptic symbols was discovered at the scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: No mysterious note with cryptic symbols was discovered at the scene
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a mysterious note with cryptic symbols was discovered at the scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, thus no mysterious note with cryptic symbols was discovered at the scene.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a mysterious note with cryptic symbols was discovered at the scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: No mysterious note with cryptic symbols was discovered at the scene
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a mysterious note with cryptic symbols was discovered at the scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, so it can be concluded that no mysterious note with cryptic symbols was discovered at the scene.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a mysterious note with cryptic symbols was discovered at the scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: No mysterious note with cryptic symbols was discovered at the scene
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a mysterious note with cryptic symbols was discovered at the scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, so no mysterious note with cryptic symbols was discovered at the scene.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a mysterious note with cryptic symbols was discovered at the scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: No mysterious note with cryptic symbols was discovered at the scene
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a mysterious note with cryptic symbols was discovered at the scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which implies that no mysterious note with cryptic symbols was discovered at the scene.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a mysterious note with cryptic symbols was discovered at the scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: No mysterious note with cryptic symbols was discovered at the scene
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a mysterious note with cryptic symbols was discovered at the scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which shows that no mysterious note with cryptic symbols was discovered at the scene.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a mysterious note with cryptic symbols was discovered at the scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: No mysterious note with cryptic symbols was discovered at the scene
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a mysterious note with cryptic symbols was discovered at the scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which establishes that no mysterious note with cryptic symbols was discovered at the scene.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a mysterious note with cryptic symbols was discovered at the scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: No mysterious note with cryptic symbols was discovered at the scene
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```No mysterious note with cryptic symbols was discovered at the scene, since if a mysterious note with cryptic symbols was discovered at the scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a mysterious note with cryptic symbols was discovered at the scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: No mysterious note with cryptic symbols was discovered at the scene
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```No mysterious note with cryptic symbols was discovered at the scene, because if a mysterious note with cryptic symbols was discovered at the scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a mysterious note with cryptic symbols was discovered at the scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: No mysterious note with cryptic symbols was discovered at the scene
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```No mysterious note with cryptic symbols was discovered at the scene, as if a mysterious note with cryptic symbols was discovered at the scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a mysterious note with cryptic symbols was discovered at the scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: No mysterious note with cryptic symbols was discovered at the scene
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the suspect had recently taken out a large loan under a false identity then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the suspect had recently taken out a large loan under a false identity, therefore the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect had recently taken out a large loan under a false identity then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The suspect had recently taken out a large loan under a false identity
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the suspect had recently taken out a large loan under a false identity then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the suspect had recently taken out a large loan under a false identity, hence the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect had recently taken out a large loan under a false identity then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The suspect had recently taken out a large loan under a false identity
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the suspect had recently taken out a large loan under a false identity then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the suspect had recently taken out a large loan under a false identity, thus the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect had recently taken out a large loan under a false identity then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The suspect had recently taken out a large loan under a false identity
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the suspect had recently taken out a large loan under a false identity then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the suspect had recently taken out a large loan under a false identity, so it can be concluded that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect had recently taken out a large loan under a false identity then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The suspect had recently taken out a large loan under a false identity
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the suspect had recently taken out a large loan under a false identity then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the suspect had recently taken out a large loan under a false identity, so the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect had recently taken out a large loan under a false identity then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The suspect had recently taken out a large loan under a false identity
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the suspect had recently taken out a large loan under a false identity then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the suspect had recently taken out a large loan under a false identity, which implies that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect had recently taken out a large loan under a false identity then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The suspect had recently taken out a large loan under a false identity
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the suspect had recently taken out a large loan under a false identity then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the suspect had recently taken out a large loan under a false identity, which shows that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect had recently taken out a large loan under a false identity then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The suspect had recently taken out a large loan under a false identity
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the suspect had recently taken out a large loan under a false identity then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the suspect had recently taken out a large loan under a false identity, which establishes that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect had recently taken out a large loan under a false identity then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The suspect had recently taken out a large loan under a false identity
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, since if the suspect had recently taken out a large loan under a false identity then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the suspect had recently taken out a large loan under a false identity.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect had recently taken out a large loan under a false identity then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The suspect had recently taken out a large loan under a false identity
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, because if the suspect had recently taken out a large loan under a false identity then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the suspect had recently taken out a large loan under a false identity.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect had recently taken out a large loan under a false identity then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The suspect had recently taken out a large loan under a false identity
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, as if the suspect had recently taken out a large loan under a false identity then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the suspect had recently taken out a large loan under a false identity.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect had recently taken out a large loan under a false identity then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The suspect had recently taken out a large loan under a false identity
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the suspect had recently taken out a large loan under a false identity then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, therefore the suspect had not recently taken out a large loan under a false identity.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect had recently taken out a large loan under a false identity then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The suspect had not recently taken out a large loan under a false identity
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the suspect had recently taken out a large loan under a false identity then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, hence the suspect had not recently taken out a large loan under a false identity.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect had recently taken out a large loan under a false identity then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The suspect had not recently taken out a large loan under a false identity
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the suspect had recently taken out a large loan under a false identity then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, thus the suspect had not recently taken out a large loan under a false identity.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect had recently taken out a large loan under a false identity then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The suspect had not recently taken out a large loan under a false identity
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the suspect had recently taken out a large loan under a false identity then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, so it can be concluded that the suspect had not recently taken out a large loan under a false identity.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect had recently taken out a large loan under a false identity then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The suspect had not recently taken out a large loan under a false identity
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the suspect had recently taken out a large loan under a false identity then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, so the suspect had not recently taken out a large loan under a false identity.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect had recently taken out a large loan under a false identity then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The suspect had not recently taken out a large loan under a false identity
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the suspect had recently taken out a large loan under a false identity then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which implies that the suspect had not recently taken out a large loan under a false identity.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect had recently taken out a large loan under a false identity then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The suspect had not recently taken out a large loan under a false identity
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the suspect had recently taken out a large loan under a false identity then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which shows that the suspect had not recently taken out a large loan under a false identity.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect had recently taken out a large loan under a false identity then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The suspect had not recently taken out a large loan under a false identity
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the suspect had recently taken out a large loan under a false identity then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which establishes that the suspect had not recently taken out a large loan under a false identity.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect had recently taken out a large loan under a false identity then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The suspect had not recently taken out a large loan under a false identity
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The suspect had not recently taken out a large loan under a false identity, since if the suspect had recently taken out a large loan under a false identity then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect had recently taken out a large loan under a false identity then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The suspect had not recently taken out a large loan under a false identity
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The suspect had not recently taken out a large loan under a false identity, because if the suspect had recently taken out a large loan under a false identity then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect had recently taken out a large loan under a false identity then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The suspect had not recently taken out a large loan under a false identity
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The suspect had not recently taken out a large loan under a false identity, as if the suspect had recently taken out a large loan under a false identity then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect had recently taken out a large loan under a false identity then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The suspect had not recently taken out a large loan under a false identity
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim's neighbors reported unusual activity in the days leading up to the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the victim's neighbors reported unusual activity in the days leading up to the murder, therefore the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's neighbors reported unusual activity in the days leading up to the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The victim's neighbors reported unusual activity in the days leading up to the murder
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim's neighbors reported unusual activity in the days leading up to the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the victim's neighbors reported unusual activity in the days leading up to the murder, hence the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's neighbors reported unusual activity in the days leading up to the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The victim's neighbors reported unusual activity in the days leading up to the murder
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim's neighbors reported unusual activity in the days leading up to the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the victim's neighbors reported unusual activity in the days leading up to the murder, thus the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's neighbors reported unusual activity in the days leading up to the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The victim's neighbors reported unusual activity in the days leading up to the murder
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim's neighbors reported unusual activity in the days leading up to the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the victim's neighbors reported unusual activity in the days leading up to the murder, so it can be concluded that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's neighbors reported unusual activity in the days leading up to the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The victim's neighbors reported unusual activity in the days leading up to the murder
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim's neighbors reported unusual activity in the days leading up to the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the victim's neighbors reported unusual activity in the days leading up to the murder, so the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's neighbors reported unusual activity in the days leading up to the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The victim's neighbors reported unusual activity in the days leading up to the murder
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim's neighbors reported unusual activity in the days leading up to the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the victim's neighbors reported unusual activity in the days leading up to the murder, which implies that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's neighbors reported unusual activity in the days leading up to the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The victim's neighbors reported unusual activity in the days leading up to the murder
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim's neighbors reported unusual activity in the days leading up to the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the victim's neighbors reported unusual activity in the days leading up to the murder, which shows that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's neighbors reported unusual activity in the days leading up to the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The victim's neighbors reported unusual activity in the days leading up to the murder
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim's neighbors reported unusual activity in the days leading up to the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the victim's neighbors reported unusual activity in the days leading up to the murder, which establishes that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's neighbors reported unusual activity in the days leading up to the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The victim's neighbors reported unusual activity in the days leading up to the murder
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, since if the victim's neighbors reported unusual activity in the days leading up to the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the victim's neighbors reported unusual activity in the days leading up to the murder.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's neighbors reported unusual activity in the days leading up to the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The victim's neighbors reported unusual activity in the days leading up to the murder
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, because if the victim's neighbors reported unusual activity in the days leading up to the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the victim's neighbors reported unusual activity in the days leading up to the murder.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's neighbors reported unusual activity in the days leading up to the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The victim's neighbors reported unusual activity in the days leading up to the murder
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, as if the victim's neighbors reported unusual activity in the days leading up to the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the victim's neighbors reported unusual activity in the days leading up to the murder.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's neighbors reported unusual activity in the days leading up to the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The victim's neighbors reported unusual activity in the days leading up to the murder
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim's neighbors reported unusual activity in the days leading up to the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, therefore the victim's neighbors did not report unusual activity in the days leading up to the murder.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's neighbors reported unusual activity in the days leading up to the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The victim's neighbors did not report unusual activity in the days leading up to the murder
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim's neighbors reported unusual activity in the days leading up to the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, hence the victim's neighbors did not report unusual activity in the days leading up to the murder.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's neighbors reported unusual activity in the days leading up to the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The victim's neighbors did not report unusual activity in the days leading up to the murder
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim's neighbors reported unusual activity in the days leading up to the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, thus the victim's neighbors did not report unusual activity in the days leading up to the murder.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's neighbors reported unusual activity in the days leading up to the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The victim's neighbors did not report unusual activity in the days leading up to the murder
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim's neighbors reported unusual activity in the days leading up to the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, so it can be concluded that the victim's neighbors did not report unusual activity in the days leading up to the murder.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's neighbors reported unusual activity in the days leading up to the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The victim's neighbors did not report unusual activity in the days leading up to the murder
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim's neighbors reported unusual activity in the days leading up to the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, so the victim's neighbors did not report unusual activity in the days leading up to the murder.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's neighbors reported unusual activity in the days leading up to the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The victim's neighbors did not report unusual activity in the days leading up to the murder
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim's neighbors reported unusual activity in the days leading up to the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which implies that the victim's neighbors did not report unusual activity in the days leading up to the murder.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's neighbors reported unusual activity in the days leading up to the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The victim's neighbors did not report unusual activity in the days leading up to the murder
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim's neighbors reported unusual activity in the days leading up to the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which shows that the victim's neighbors did not report unusual activity in the days leading up to the murder.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's neighbors reported unusual activity in the days leading up to the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The victim's neighbors did not report unusual activity in the days leading up to the murder
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim's neighbors reported unusual activity in the days leading up to the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which establishes that the victim's neighbors did not report unusual activity in the days leading up to the murder.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's neighbors reported unusual activity in the days leading up to the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The victim's neighbors did not report unusual activity in the days leading up to the murder
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The victim's neighbors did not report unusual activity in the days leading up to the murder, since if the victim's neighbors reported unusual activity in the days leading up to the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's neighbors reported unusual activity in the days leading up to the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The victim's neighbors did not report unusual activity in the days leading up to the murder
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The victim's neighbors did not report unusual activity in the days leading up to the murder, because if the victim's neighbors reported unusual activity in the days leading up to the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's neighbors reported unusual activity in the days leading up to the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The victim's neighbors did not report unusual activity in the days leading up to the murder
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The victim's neighbors did not report unusual activity in the days leading up to the murder, as if the victim's neighbors reported unusual activity in the days leading up to the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's neighbors reported unusual activity in the days leading up to the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The victim's neighbors did not report unusual activity in the days leading up to the murder
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a forensic expert matched the suspect's dna to evidence found at the crime scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a forensic expert matched the suspect's dna to evidence found at the crime scene, therefore the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a forensic expert matched the suspect's dna to evidence found at the crime scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A forensic expert matched the suspect's dna to evidence found at the crime scene
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a forensic expert matched the suspect's dna to evidence found at the crime scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a forensic expert matched the suspect's dna to evidence found at the crime scene, hence the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a forensic expert matched the suspect's dna to evidence found at the crime scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A forensic expert matched the suspect's dna to evidence found at the crime scene
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a forensic expert matched the suspect's dna to evidence found at the crime scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a forensic expert matched the suspect's dna to evidence found at the crime scene, thus the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a forensic expert matched the suspect's dna to evidence found at the crime scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A forensic expert matched the suspect's dna to evidence found at the crime scene
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a forensic expert matched the suspect's dna to evidence found at the crime scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a forensic expert matched the suspect's dna to evidence found at the crime scene, so it can be concluded that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a forensic expert matched the suspect's dna to evidence found at the crime scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A forensic expert matched the suspect's dna to evidence found at the crime scene
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a forensic expert matched the suspect's dna to evidence found at the crime scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a forensic expert matched the suspect's dna to evidence found at the crime scene, so the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a forensic expert matched the suspect's dna to evidence found at the crime scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A forensic expert matched the suspect's dna to evidence found at the crime scene
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a forensic expert matched the suspect's dna to evidence found at the crime scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a forensic expert matched the suspect's dna to evidence found at the crime scene, which implies that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a forensic expert matched the suspect's dna to evidence found at the crime scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A forensic expert matched the suspect's dna to evidence found at the crime scene
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a forensic expert matched the suspect's dna to evidence found at the crime scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a forensic expert matched the suspect's dna to evidence found at the crime scene, which shows that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a forensic expert matched the suspect's dna to evidence found at the crime scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A forensic expert matched the suspect's dna to evidence found at the crime scene
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a forensic expert matched the suspect's dna to evidence found at the crime scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a forensic expert matched the suspect's dna to evidence found at the crime scene, which establishes that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a forensic expert matched the suspect's dna to evidence found at the crime scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A forensic expert matched the suspect's dna to evidence found at the crime scene
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, since if a forensic expert matched the suspect's dna to evidence found at the crime scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and a forensic expert matched the suspect's dna to evidence found at the crime scene.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a forensic expert matched the suspect's dna to evidence found at the crime scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A forensic expert matched the suspect's dna to evidence found at the crime scene
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, because if a forensic expert matched the suspect's dna to evidence found at the crime scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and a forensic expert matched the suspect's dna to evidence found at the crime scene.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a forensic expert matched the suspect's dna to evidence found at the crime scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A forensic expert matched the suspect's dna to evidence found at the crime scene
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, as if a forensic expert matched the suspect's dna to evidence found at the crime scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and a forensic expert matched the suspect's dna to evidence found at the crime scene.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a forensic expert matched the suspect's dna to evidence found at the crime scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A forensic expert matched the suspect's dna to evidence found at the crime scene
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a forensic expert matched the suspect's dna to evidence found at the crime scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, therefore a forensic expert did not match the suspect's dna to evidence found at the crime scene.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a forensic expert matched the suspect's dna to evidence found at the crime scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: A forensic expert did not match the suspect's DNA to evidence found at the crime scene
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a forensic expert matched the suspect's dna to evidence found at the crime scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, hence a forensic expert did not match the suspect's dna to evidence found at the crime scene.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a forensic expert matched the suspect's dna to evidence found at the crime scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: A forensic expert did not match the suspect's DNA to evidence found at the crime scene
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a forensic expert matched the suspect's dna to evidence found at the crime scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, thus a forensic expert did not match the suspect's dna to evidence found at the crime scene.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a forensic expert matched the suspect's dna to evidence found at the crime scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: A forensic expert did not match the suspect's DNA to evidence found at the crime scene
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a forensic expert matched the suspect's dna to evidence found at the crime scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, so it can be concluded that a forensic expert did not match the suspect's dna to evidence found at the crime scene.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a forensic expert matched the suspect's dna to evidence found at the crime scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: A forensic expert did not match the suspect's DNA to evidence found at the crime scene
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a forensic expert matched the suspect's dna to evidence found at the crime scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, so a forensic expert did not match the suspect's dna to evidence found at the crime scene.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a forensic expert matched the suspect's dna to evidence found at the crime scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: A forensic expert did not match the suspect's DNA to evidence found at the crime scene
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a forensic expert matched the suspect's dna to evidence found at the crime scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which implies that a forensic expert did not match the suspect's dna to evidence found at the crime scene.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a forensic expert matched the suspect's dna to evidence found at the crime scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: A forensic expert did not match the suspect's DNA to evidence found at the crime scene
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a forensic expert matched the suspect's dna to evidence found at the crime scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which shows that a forensic expert did not match the suspect's dna to evidence found at the crime scene.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a forensic expert matched the suspect's dna to evidence found at the crime scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: A forensic expert did not match the suspect's DNA to evidence found at the crime scene
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a forensic expert matched the suspect's dna to evidence found at the crime scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which establishes that a forensic expert did not match the suspect's dna to evidence found at the crime scene.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a forensic expert matched the suspect's dna to evidence found at the crime scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: A forensic expert did not match the suspect's DNA to evidence found at the crime scene
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```A forensic expert did not match the suspect's dna to evidence found at the crime scene, since if a forensic expert matched the suspect's dna to evidence found at the crime scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a forensic expert matched the suspect's dna to evidence found at the crime scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: A forensic expert did not match the suspect's DNA to evidence found at the crime scene
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```A forensic expert did not match the suspect's dna to evidence found at the crime scene, because if a forensic expert matched the suspect's dna to evidence found at the crime scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a forensic expert matched the suspect's dna to evidence found at the crime scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: A forensic expert did not match the suspect's DNA to evidence found at the crime scene
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```A forensic expert did not match the suspect's dna to evidence found at the crime scene, as if a forensic expert matched the suspect's dna to evidence found at the crime scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a forensic expert matched the suspect's dna to evidence found at the crime scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: A forensic expert did not match the suspect's DNA to evidence found at the crime scene
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the suspect had a strong motive for wanting the victim dead then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the suspect had a strong motive for wanting the victim dead, therefore the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect had a strong motive for wanting the victim dead then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The suspect had a strong motive for wanting the victim dead
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the suspect had a strong motive for wanting the victim dead then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the suspect had a strong motive for wanting the victim dead, hence the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect had a strong motive for wanting the victim dead then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The suspect had a strong motive for wanting the victim dead
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the suspect had a strong motive for wanting the victim dead then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the suspect had a strong motive for wanting the victim dead, thus the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect had a strong motive for wanting the victim dead then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The suspect had a strong motive for wanting the victim dead
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the suspect had a strong motive for wanting the victim dead then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the suspect had a strong motive for wanting the victim dead, so it can be concluded that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect had a strong motive for wanting the victim dead then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The suspect had a strong motive for wanting the victim dead
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the suspect had a strong motive for wanting the victim dead then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the suspect had a strong motive for wanting the victim dead, so the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect had a strong motive for wanting the victim dead then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The suspect had a strong motive for wanting the victim dead
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the suspect had a strong motive for wanting the victim dead then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the suspect had a strong motive for wanting the victim dead, which implies that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect had a strong motive for wanting the victim dead then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The suspect had a strong motive for wanting the victim dead
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the suspect had a strong motive for wanting the victim dead then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the suspect had a strong motive for wanting the victim dead, which shows that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect had a strong motive for wanting the victim dead then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The suspect had a strong motive for wanting the victim dead
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the suspect had a strong motive for wanting the victim dead then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the suspect had a strong motive for wanting the victim dead, which establishes that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect had a strong motive for wanting the victim dead then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The suspect had a strong motive for wanting the victim dead
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, since if the suspect had a strong motive for wanting the victim dead then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the suspect had a strong motive for wanting the victim dead.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect had a strong motive for wanting the victim dead then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The suspect had a strong motive for wanting the victim dead
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, because if the suspect had a strong motive for wanting the victim dead then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the suspect had a strong motive for wanting the victim dead.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect had a strong motive for wanting the victim dead then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The suspect had a strong motive for wanting the victim dead
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, as if the suspect had a strong motive for wanting the victim dead then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the suspect had a strong motive for wanting the victim dead.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect had a strong motive for wanting the victim dead then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The suspect had a strong motive for wanting the victim dead
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the suspect had a strong motive for wanting the victim dead then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, therefore the suspect did not have a strong motive for wanting the victim dead.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect had a strong motive for wanting the victim dead then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The suspect did not have a strong motive for wanting the victim dead
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the suspect had a strong motive for wanting the victim dead then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, hence the suspect did not have a strong motive for wanting the victim dead.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect had a strong motive for wanting the victim dead then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The suspect did not have a strong motive for wanting the victim dead
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the suspect had a strong motive for wanting the victim dead then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, thus the suspect did not have a strong motive for wanting the victim dead.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect had a strong motive for wanting the victim dead then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The suspect did not have a strong motive for wanting the victim dead
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the suspect had a strong motive for wanting the victim dead then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, so it can be concluded that the suspect did not have a strong motive for wanting the victim dead.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect had a strong motive for wanting the victim dead then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The suspect did not have a strong motive for wanting the victim dead
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the suspect had a strong motive for wanting the victim dead then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, so the suspect did not have a strong motive for wanting the victim dead.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect had a strong motive for wanting the victim dead then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The suspect did not have a strong motive for wanting the victim dead
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the suspect had a strong motive for wanting the victim dead then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which implies that the suspect did not have a strong motive for wanting the victim dead.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect had a strong motive for wanting the victim dead then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The suspect did not have a strong motive for wanting the victim dead
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the suspect had a strong motive for wanting the victim dead then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which shows that the suspect did not have a strong motive for wanting the victim dead.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect had a strong motive for wanting the victim dead then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The suspect did not have a strong motive for wanting the victim dead
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the suspect had a strong motive for wanting the victim dead then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which establishes that the suspect did not have a strong motive for wanting the victim dead.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect had a strong motive for wanting the victim dead then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The suspect did not have a strong motive for wanting the victim dead
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The suspect did not have a strong motive for wanting the victim dead, since if the suspect had a strong motive for wanting the victim dead then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect had a strong motive for wanting the victim dead then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The suspect did not have a strong motive for wanting the victim dead
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The suspect did not have a strong motive for wanting the victim dead, because if the suspect had a strong motive for wanting the victim dead then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect had a strong motive for wanting the victim dead then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The suspect did not have a strong motive for wanting the victim dead
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The suspect did not have a strong motive for wanting the victim dead, as if the suspect had a strong motive for wanting the victim dead then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect had a strong motive for wanting the victim dead then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The suspect did not have a strong motive for wanting the victim dead
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim had recently changed the locks on their doors then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the victim had recently changed the locks on their doors, therefore the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim had recently changed the locks on their doors then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The victim had recently changed the locks on their doors
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.