<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street, and officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene, therefore the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
stringlengths 355
1.02k
|
|---|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim's office safe had been tampered with, but its contents remained intact then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, thus the victim's office safe had not been tampered with, and its contents remained intact.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's office safe had been tampered with, but its contents remained intact then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The victim's office safe had not been tampered with, and its contents remained intact
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim's office safe had been tampered with, but its contents remained intact then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, so it can be concluded that the victim's office safe had not been tampered with, and its contents remained intact.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's office safe had been tampered with, but its contents remained intact then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The victim's office safe had not been tampered with, and its contents remained intact
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim's office safe had been tampered with, but its contents remained intact then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, so the victim's office safe had not been tampered with, and its contents remained intact.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's office safe had been tampered with, but its contents remained intact then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The victim's office safe had not been tampered with, and its contents remained intact
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim's office safe had been tampered with, but its contents remained intact then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which implies that the victim's office safe had not been tampered with, and its contents remained intact.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's office safe had been tampered with, but its contents remained intact then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The victim's office safe had not been tampered with, and its contents remained intact
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim's office safe had been tampered with, but its contents remained intact then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which shows that the victim's office safe had not been tampered with, and its contents remained intact.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's office safe had been tampered with, but its contents remained intact then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The victim's office safe had not been tampered with, and its contents remained intact
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim's office safe had been tampered with, but its contents remained intact then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which establishes that the victim's office safe had not been tampered with, and its contents remained intact.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's office safe had been tampered with, but its contents remained intact then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The victim's office safe had not been tampered with, and its contents remained intact
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The victim's office safe had not been tampered with, and its contents remained intact, since if the victim's office safe had been tampered with, but its contents remained intact then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's office safe had been tampered with, but its contents remained intact then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The victim's office safe had not been tampered with, and its contents remained intact
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The victim's office safe had not been tampered with, and its contents remained intact, because if the victim's office safe had been tampered with, but its contents remained intact then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's office safe had been tampered with, but its contents remained intact then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The victim's office safe had not been tampered with, and its contents remained intact
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The victim's office safe had not been tampered with, and its contents remained intact, as if the victim's office safe had been tampered with, but its contents remained intact then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's office safe had been tampered with, but its contents remained intact then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The victim's office safe had not been tampered with, and its contents remained intact
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the suspect had a history of gambling debts and financial problems then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the suspect had a history of gambling debts and financial problems, therefore the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect had a history of gambling debts and financial problems then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The suspect had a history of gambling debts and financial problems
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the suspect had a history of gambling debts and financial problems then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the suspect had a history of gambling debts and financial problems, hence the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect had a history of gambling debts and financial problems then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The suspect had a history of gambling debts and financial problems
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the suspect had a history of gambling debts and financial problems then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the suspect had a history of gambling debts and financial problems, thus the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect had a history of gambling debts and financial problems then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The suspect had a history of gambling debts and financial problems
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the suspect had a history of gambling debts and financial problems then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the suspect had a history of gambling debts and financial problems, so it can be concluded that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect had a history of gambling debts and financial problems then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The suspect had a history of gambling debts and financial problems
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the suspect had a history of gambling debts and financial problems then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the suspect had a history of gambling debts and financial problems, so the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect had a history of gambling debts and financial problems then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The suspect had a history of gambling debts and financial problems
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the suspect had a history of gambling debts and financial problems then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the suspect had a history of gambling debts and financial problems, which implies that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect had a history of gambling debts and financial problems then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The suspect had a history of gambling debts and financial problems
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the suspect had a history of gambling debts and financial problems then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the suspect had a history of gambling debts and financial problems, which shows that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect had a history of gambling debts and financial problems then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The suspect had a history of gambling debts and financial problems
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the suspect had a history of gambling debts and financial problems then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the suspect had a history of gambling debts and financial problems, which establishes that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect had a history of gambling debts and financial problems then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The suspect had a history of gambling debts and financial problems
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, since if the suspect had a history of gambling debts and financial problems then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the suspect had a history of gambling debts and financial problems.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect had a history of gambling debts and financial problems then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The suspect had a history of gambling debts and financial problems
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, because if the suspect had a history of gambling debts and financial problems then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the suspect had a history of gambling debts and financial problems.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect had a history of gambling debts and financial problems then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The suspect had a history of gambling debts and financial problems
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, as if the suspect had a history of gambling debts and financial problems then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the suspect had a history of gambling debts and financial problems.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect had a history of gambling debts and financial problems then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The suspect had a history of gambling debts and financial problems
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the suspect had a history of gambling debts and financial problems then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, therefore the suspect did not have a history of gambling debts and financial problems.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect had a history of gambling debts and financial problems then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The suspect did not have a history of gambling debts and financial problems
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the suspect had a history of gambling debts and financial problems then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, hence the suspect did not have a history of gambling debts and financial problems.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect had a history of gambling debts and financial problems then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The suspect did not have a history of gambling debts and financial problems
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the suspect had a history of gambling debts and financial problems then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, thus the suspect did not have a history of gambling debts and financial problems.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect had a history of gambling debts and financial problems then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The suspect did not have a history of gambling debts and financial problems
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the suspect had a history of gambling debts and financial problems then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, so it can be concluded that the suspect did not have a history of gambling debts and financial problems.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect had a history of gambling debts and financial problems then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The suspect did not have a history of gambling debts and financial problems
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the suspect had a history of gambling debts and financial problems then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, so the suspect did not have a history of gambling debts and financial problems.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect had a history of gambling debts and financial problems then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The suspect did not have a history of gambling debts and financial problems
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the suspect had a history of gambling debts and financial problems then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which implies that the suspect did not have a history of gambling debts and financial problems.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect had a history of gambling debts and financial problems then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The suspect did not have a history of gambling debts and financial problems
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the suspect had a history of gambling debts and financial problems then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which shows that the suspect did not have a history of gambling debts and financial problems.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect had a history of gambling debts and financial problems then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The suspect did not have a history of gambling debts and financial problems
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the suspect had a history of gambling debts and financial problems then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which establishes that the suspect did not have a history of gambling debts and financial problems.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect had a history of gambling debts and financial problems then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The suspect did not have a history of gambling debts and financial problems
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The suspect did not have a history of gambling debts and financial problems, since if the suspect had a history of gambling debts and financial problems then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect had a history of gambling debts and financial problems then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The suspect did not have a history of gambling debts and financial problems
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The suspect did not have a history of gambling debts and financial problems, because if the suspect had a history of gambling debts and financial problems then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect had a history of gambling debts and financial problems then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The suspect did not have a history of gambling debts and financial problems
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The suspect did not have a history of gambling debts and financial problems, as if the suspect had a history of gambling debts and financial problems then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect had a history of gambling debts and financial problems then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The suspect did not have a history of gambling debts and financial problems
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a hidden camera caught the suspect planting evidence at the crime scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a hidden camera caught the suspect planting evidence at the crime scene, therefore the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a hidden camera caught the suspect planting evidence at the crime scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A hidden camera caught the suspect planting evidence at the crime scene
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a hidden camera caught the suspect planting evidence at the crime scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a hidden camera caught the suspect planting evidence at the crime scene, hence the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a hidden camera caught the suspect planting evidence at the crime scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A hidden camera caught the suspect planting evidence at the crime scene
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a hidden camera caught the suspect planting evidence at the crime scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a hidden camera caught the suspect planting evidence at the crime scene, thus the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a hidden camera caught the suspect planting evidence at the crime scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A hidden camera caught the suspect planting evidence at the crime scene
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a hidden camera caught the suspect planting evidence at the crime scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a hidden camera caught the suspect planting evidence at the crime scene, so it can be concluded that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a hidden camera caught the suspect planting evidence at the crime scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A hidden camera caught the suspect planting evidence at the crime scene
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a hidden camera caught the suspect planting evidence at the crime scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a hidden camera caught the suspect planting evidence at the crime scene, so the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a hidden camera caught the suspect planting evidence at the crime scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A hidden camera caught the suspect planting evidence at the crime scene
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a hidden camera caught the suspect planting evidence at the crime scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a hidden camera caught the suspect planting evidence at the crime scene, which implies that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a hidden camera caught the suspect planting evidence at the crime scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A hidden camera caught the suspect planting evidence at the crime scene
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a hidden camera caught the suspect planting evidence at the crime scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a hidden camera caught the suspect planting evidence at the crime scene, which shows that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a hidden camera caught the suspect planting evidence at the crime scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A hidden camera caught the suspect planting evidence at the crime scene
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a hidden camera caught the suspect planting evidence at the crime scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a hidden camera caught the suspect planting evidence at the crime scene, which establishes that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a hidden camera caught the suspect planting evidence at the crime scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A hidden camera caught the suspect planting evidence at the crime scene
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, since if a hidden camera caught the suspect planting evidence at the crime scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and a hidden camera caught the suspect planting evidence at the crime scene.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a hidden camera caught the suspect planting evidence at the crime scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A hidden camera caught the suspect planting evidence at the crime scene
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, because if a hidden camera caught the suspect planting evidence at the crime scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and a hidden camera caught the suspect planting evidence at the crime scene.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a hidden camera caught the suspect planting evidence at the crime scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A hidden camera caught the suspect planting evidence at the crime scene
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, as if a hidden camera caught the suspect planting evidence at the crime scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and a hidden camera caught the suspect planting evidence at the crime scene.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a hidden camera caught the suspect planting evidence at the crime scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A hidden camera caught the suspect planting evidence at the crime scene
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a hidden camera caught the suspect planting evidence at the crime scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, therefore no hidden camera caught the suspect planting evidence at the crime scene.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a hidden camera caught the suspect planting evidence at the crime scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: No hidden camera caught the suspect planting evidence at the crime scene
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a hidden camera caught the suspect planting evidence at the crime scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, hence no hidden camera caught the suspect planting evidence at the crime scene.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a hidden camera caught the suspect planting evidence at the crime scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: No hidden camera caught the suspect planting evidence at the crime scene
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a hidden camera caught the suspect planting evidence at the crime scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, thus no hidden camera caught the suspect planting evidence at the crime scene.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a hidden camera caught the suspect planting evidence at the crime scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: No hidden camera caught the suspect planting evidence at the crime scene
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a hidden camera caught the suspect planting evidence at the crime scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, so it can be concluded that no hidden camera caught the suspect planting evidence at the crime scene.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a hidden camera caught the suspect planting evidence at the crime scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: No hidden camera caught the suspect planting evidence at the crime scene
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a hidden camera caught the suspect planting evidence at the crime scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, so no hidden camera caught the suspect planting evidence at the crime scene.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a hidden camera caught the suspect planting evidence at the crime scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: No hidden camera caught the suspect planting evidence at the crime scene
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a hidden camera caught the suspect planting evidence at the crime scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which implies that no hidden camera caught the suspect planting evidence at the crime scene.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a hidden camera caught the suspect planting evidence at the crime scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: No hidden camera caught the suspect planting evidence at the crime scene
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a hidden camera caught the suspect planting evidence at the crime scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which shows that no hidden camera caught the suspect planting evidence at the crime scene.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a hidden camera caught the suspect planting evidence at the crime scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: No hidden camera caught the suspect planting evidence at the crime scene
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a hidden camera caught the suspect planting evidence at the crime scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which establishes that no hidden camera caught the suspect planting evidence at the crime scene.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a hidden camera caught the suspect planting evidence at the crime scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: No hidden camera caught the suspect planting evidence at the crime scene
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```No hidden camera caught the suspect planting evidence at the crime scene, since if a hidden camera caught the suspect planting evidence at the crime scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a hidden camera caught the suspect planting evidence at the crime scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: No hidden camera caught the suspect planting evidence at the crime scene
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```No hidden camera caught the suspect planting evidence at the crime scene, because if a hidden camera caught the suspect planting evidence at the crime scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a hidden camera caught the suspect planting evidence at the crime scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: No hidden camera caught the suspect planting evidence at the crime scene
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```No hidden camera caught the suspect planting evidence at the crime scene, as if a hidden camera caught the suspect planting evidence at the crime scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a hidden camera caught the suspect planting evidence at the crime scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: No hidden camera caught the suspect planting evidence at the crime scene
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim's laptop contained encrypted files with sensitive information then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the victim's laptop contained encrypted files with sensitive information, therefore the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's laptop contained encrypted files with sensitive information then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The victim's laptop contained encrypted files with sensitive information
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim's laptop contained encrypted files with sensitive information then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the victim's laptop contained encrypted files with sensitive information, hence the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's laptop contained encrypted files with sensitive information then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The victim's laptop contained encrypted files with sensitive information
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim's laptop contained encrypted files with sensitive information then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the victim's laptop contained encrypted files with sensitive information, thus the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's laptop contained encrypted files with sensitive information then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The victim's laptop contained encrypted files with sensitive information
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim's laptop contained encrypted files with sensitive information then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the victim's laptop contained encrypted files with sensitive information, so it can be concluded that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's laptop contained encrypted files with sensitive information then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The victim's laptop contained encrypted files with sensitive information
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim's laptop contained encrypted files with sensitive information then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the victim's laptop contained encrypted files with sensitive information, so the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's laptop contained encrypted files with sensitive information then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The victim's laptop contained encrypted files with sensitive information
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim's laptop contained encrypted files with sensitive information then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the victim's laptop contained encrypted files with sensitive information, which implies that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's laptop contained encrypted files with sensitive information then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The victim's laptop contained encrypted files with sensitive information
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim's laptop contained encrypted files with sensitive information then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the victim's laptop contained encrypted files with sensitive information, which shows that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's laptop contained encrypted files with sensitive information then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The victim's laptop contained encrypted files with sensitive information
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim's laptop contained encrypted files with sensitive information then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the victim's laptop contained encrypted files with sensitive information, which establishes that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's laptop contained encrypted files with sensitive information then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The victim's laptop contained encrypted files with sensitive information
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, since if the victim's laptop contained encrypted files with sensitive information then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the victim's laptop contained encrypted files with sensitive information.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's laptop contained encrypted files with sensitive information then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The victim's laptop contained encrypted files with sensitive information
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, because if the victim's laptop contained encrypted files with sensitive information then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the victim's laptop contained encrypted files with sensitive information.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's laptop contained encrypted files with sensitive information then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The victim's laptop contained encrypted files with sensitive information
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, as if the victim's laptop contained encrypted files with sensitive information then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the victim's laptop contained encrypted files with sensitive information.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's laptop contained encrypted files with sensitive information then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The victim's laptop contained encrypted files with sensitive information
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim's laptop contained encrypted files with sensitive information then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, therefore the victim's laptop did not contain encrypted files with sensitive information.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's laptop contained encrypted files with sensitive information then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The victim's laptop did not contain encrypted files with sensitive information
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim's laptop contained encrypted files with sensitive information then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, hence the victim's laptop did not contain encrypted files with sensitive information.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's laptop contained encrypted files with sensitive information then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The victim's laptop did not contain encrypted files with sensitive information
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim's laptop contained encrypted files with sensitive information then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, thus the victim's laptop did not contain encrypted files with sensitive information.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's laptop contained encrypted files with sensitive information then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The victim's laptop did not contain encrypted files with sensitive information
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim's laptop contained encrypted files with sensitive information then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, so it can be concluded that the victim's laptop did not contain encrypted files with sensitive information.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's laptop contained encrypted files with sensitive information then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The victim's laptop did not contain encrypted files with sensitive information
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim's laptop contained encrypted files with sensitive information then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, so the victim's laptop did not contain encrypted files with sensitive information.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's laptop contained encrypted files with sensitive information then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The victim's laptop did not contain encrypted files with sensitive information
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim's laptop contained encrypted files with sensitive information then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which implies that the victim's laptop did not contain encrypted files with sensitive information.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's laptop contained encrypted files with sensitive information then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The victim's laptop did not contain encrypted files with sensitive information
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim's laptop contained encrypted files with sensitive information then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which shows that the victim's laptop did not contain encrypted files with sensitive information.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's laptop contained encrypted files with sensitive information then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The victim's laptop did not contain encrypted files with sensitive information
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim's laptop contained encrypted files with sensitive information then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which establishes that the victim's laptop did not contain encrypted files with sensitive information.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's laptop contained encrypted files with sensitive information then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The victim's laptop did not contain encrypted files with sensitive information
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The victim's laptop did not contain encrypted files with sensitive information, since if the victim's laptop contained encrypted files with sensitive information then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's laptop contained encrypted files with sensitive information then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The victim's laptop did not contain encrypted files with sensitive information
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The victim's laptop did not contain encrypted files with sensitive information, because if the victim's laptop contained encrypted files with sensitive information then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's laptop contained encrypted files with sensitive information then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The victim's laptop did not contain encrypted files with sensitive information
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The victim's laptop did not contain encrypted files with sensitive information, as if the victim's laptop contained encrypted files with sensitive information then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's laptop contained encrypted files with sensitive information then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The victim's laptop did not contain encrypted files with sensitive information
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the suspect's phone records placed them near the crime scene at the time of the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the suspect's phone records placed them near the crime scene at the time of the murder, therefore the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect's phone records placed them near the crime scene at the time of the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The suspect's phone records placed them near the crime scene at the time of the murder
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the suspect's phone records placed them near the crime scene at the time of the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the suspect's phone records placed them near the crime scene at the time of the murder, hence the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect's phone records placed them near the crime scene at the time of the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The suspect's phone records placed them near the crime scene at the time of the murder
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the suspect's phone records placed them near the crime scene at the time of the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the suspect's phone records placed them near the crime scene at the time of the murder, thus the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect's phone records placed them near the crime scene at the time of the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The suspect's phone records placed them near the crime scene at the time of the murder
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the suspect's phone records placed them near the crime scene at the time of the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the suspect's phone records placed them near the crime scene at the time of the murder, so it can be concluded that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect's phone records placed them near the crime scene at the time of the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The suspect's phone records placed them near the crime scene at the time of the murder
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the suspect's phone records placed them near the crime scene at the time of the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the suspect's phone records placed them near the crime scene at the time of the murder, so the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect's phone records placed them near the crime scene at the time of the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The suspect's phone records placed them near the crime scene at the time of the murder
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the suspect's phone records placed them near the crime scene at the time of the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the suspect's phone records placed them near the crime scene at the time of the murder, which implies that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect's phone records placed them near the crime scene at the time of the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The suspect's phone records placed them near the crime scene at the time of the murder
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the suspect's phone records placed them near the crime scene at the time of the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the suspect's phone records placed them near the crime scene at the time of the murder, which shows that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect's phone records placed them near the crime scene at the time of the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The suspect's phone records placed them near the crime scene at the time of the murder
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the suspect's phone records placed them near the crime scene at the time of the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the suspect's phone records placed them near the crime scene at the time of the murder, which establishes that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect's phone records placed them near the crime scene at the time of the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The suspect's phone records placed them near the crime scene at the time of the murder
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, since if the suspect's phone records placed them near the crime scene at the time of the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the suspect's phone records placed them near the crime scene at the time of the murder.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect's phone records placed them near the crime scene at the time of the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The suspect's phone records placed them near the crime scene at the time of the murder
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, because if the suspect's phone records placed them near the crime scene at the time of the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the suspect's phone records placed them near the crime scene at the time of the murder.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect's phone records placed them near the crime scene at the time of the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The suspect's phone records placed them near the crime scene at the time of the murder
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, as if the suspect's phone records placed them near the crime scene at the time of the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the suspect's phone records placed them near the crime scene at the time of the murder.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect's phone records placed them near the crime scene at the time of the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The suspect's phone records placed them near the crime scene at the time of the murder
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the suspect's phone records placed them near the crime scene at the time of the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, therefore the suspect's phone records did not place them near the crime scene at the time of the murder.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect's phone records placed them near the crime scene at the time of the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The suspect's phone records did not place them near the crime scene at the time of the murder
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the suspect's phone records placed them near the crime scene at the time of the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, hence the suspect's phone records did not place them near the crime scene at the time of the murder.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect's phone records placed them near the crime scene at the time of the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The suspect's phone records did not place them near the crime scene at the time of the murder
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the suspect's phone records placed them near the crime scene at the time of the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, thus the suspect's phone records did not place them near the crime scene at the time of the murder.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect's phone records placed them near the crime scene at the time of the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The suspect's phone records did not place them near the crime scene at the time of the murder
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the suspect's phone records placed them near the crime scene at the time of the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, so it can be concluded that the suspect's phone records did not place them near the crime scene at the time of the murder.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect's phone records placed them near the crime scene at the time of the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The suspect's phone records did not place them near the crime scene at the time of the murder
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the suspect's phone records placed them near the crime scene at the time of the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, so the suspect's phone records did not place them near the crime scene at the time of the murder.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect's phone records placed them near the crime scene at the time of the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The suspect's phone records did not place them near the crime scene at the time of the murder
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the suspect's phone records placed them near the crime scene at the time of the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which implies that the suspect's phone records did not place them near the crime scene at the time of the murder.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect's phone records placed them near the crime scene at the time of the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The suspect's phone records did not place them near the crime scene at the time of the murder
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the suspect's phone records placed them near the crime scene at the time of the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which shows that the suspect's phone records did not place them near the crime scene at the time of the murder.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect's phone records placed them near the crime scene at the time of the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The suspect's phone records did not place them near the crime scene at the time of the murder
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the suspect's phone records placed them near the crime scene at the time of the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which establishes that the suspect's phone records did not place them near the crime scene at the time of the murder.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect's phone records placed them near the crime scene at the time of the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The suspect's phone records did not place them near the crime scene at the time of the murder
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The suspect's phone records did not place them near the crime scene at the time of the murder, since if the suspect's phone records placed them near the crime scene at the time of the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect's phone records placed them near the crime scene at the time of the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The suspect's phone records did not place them near the crime scene at the time of the murder
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The suspect's phone records did not place them near the crime scene at the time of the murder, because if the suspect's phone records placed them near the crime scene at the time of the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect's phone records placed them near the crime scene at the time of the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The suspect's phone records did not place them near the crime scene at the time of the murder
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The suspect's phone records did not place them near the crime scene at the time of the murder, as if the suspect's phone records placed them near the crime scene at the time of the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect's phone records placed them near the crime scene at the time of the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The suspect's phone records did not place them near the crime scene at the time of the murder
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim's diary contained entries detailing their fear of an unknown stalker then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the victim's diary contained entries detailing their fear of an unknown stalker, therefore the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's diary contained entries detailing their fear of an unknown stalker then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The victim's diary contained entries detailing their fear of an unknown stalker
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim's diary contained entries detailing their fear of an unknown stalker then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the victim's diary contained entries detailing their fear of an unknown stalker, hence the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's diary contained entries detailing their fear of an unknown stalker then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The victim's diary contained entries detailing their fear of an unknown stalker
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim's diary contained entries detailing their fear of an unknown stalker then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the victim's diary contained entries detailing their fear of an unknown stalker, thus the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's diary contained entries detailing their fear of an unknown stalker then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The victim's diary contained entries detailing their fear of an unknown stalker
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.