<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street, and officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene, therefore the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
stringlengths 355
1.02k
|
|---|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim had recently changed the locks on their doors then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the victim had recently changed the locks on their doors, hence the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim had recently changed the locks on their doors then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The victim had recently changed the locks on their doors
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim had recently changed the locks on their doors then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the victim had recently changed the locks on their doors, thus the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim had recently changed the locks on their doors then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The victim had recently changed the locks on their doors
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim had recently changed the locks on their doors then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the victim had recently changed the locks on their doors, so it can be concluded that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim had recently changed the locks on their doors then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The victim had recently changed the locks on their doors
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim had recently changed the locks on their doors then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the victim had recently changed the locks on their doors, so the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim had recently changed the locks on their doors then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The victim had recently changed the locks on their doors
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim had recently changed the locks on their doors then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the victim had recently changed the locks on their doors, which implies that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim had recently changed the locks on their doors then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The victim had recently changed the locks on their doors
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim had recently changed the locks on their doors then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the victim had recently changed the locks on their doors, which shows that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim had recently changed the locks on their doors then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The victim had recently changed the locks on their doors
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim had recently changed the locks on their doors then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the victim had recently changed the locks on their doors, which establishes that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim had recently changed the locks on their doors then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The victim had recently changed the locks on their doors
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, since if the victim had recently changed the locks on their doors then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the victim had recently changed the locks on their doors.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim had recently changed the locks on their doors then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The victim had recently changed the locks on their doors
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, because if the victim had recently changed the locks on their doors then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the victim had recently changed the locks on their doors.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim had recently changed the locks on their doors then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The victim had recently changed the locks on their doors
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, as if the victim had recently changed the locks on their doors then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the victim had recently changed the locks on their doors.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim had recently changed the locks on their doors then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The victim had recently changed the locks on their doors
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim had recently changed the locks on their doors then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, therefore the victim had not recently changed the locks on their doors.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim had recently changed the locks on their doors then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The victim had not recently changed the locks on their doors
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim had recently changed the locks on their doors then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, hence the victim had not recently changed the locks on their doors.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim had recently changed the locks on their doors then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The victim had not recently changed the locks on their doors
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim had recently changed the locks on their doors then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, thus the victim had not recently changed the locks on their doors.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim had recently changed the locks on their doors then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The victim had not recently changed the locks on their doors
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim had recently changed the locks on their doors then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, so it can be concluded that the victim had not recently changed the locks on their doors.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim had recently changed the locks on their doors then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The victim had not recently changed the locks on their doors
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim had recently changed the locks on their doors then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, so the victim had not recently changed the locks on their doors.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim had recently changed the locks on their doors then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The victim had not recently changed the locks on their doors
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim had recently changed the locks on their doors then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which implies that the victim had not recently changed the locks on their doors.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim had recently changed the locks on their doors then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The victim had not recently changed the locks on their doors
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim had recently changed the locks on their doors then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which shows that the victim had not recently changed the locks on their doors.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim had recently changed the locks on their doors then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The victim had not recently changed the locks on their doors
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim had recently changed the locks on their doors then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which establishes that the victim had not recently changed the locks on their doors.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim had recently changed the locks on their doors then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The victim had not recently changed the locks on their doors
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The victim had not recently changed the locks on their doors, since if the victim had recently changed the locks on their doors then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim had recently changed the locks on their doors then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The victim had not recently changed the locks on their doors
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The victim had not recently changed the locks on their doors, because if the victim had recently changed the locks on their doors then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim had recently changed the locks on their doors then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The victim had not recently changed the locks on their doors
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The victim had not recently changed the locks on their doors, as if the victim had recently changed the locks on their doors then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim had recently changed the locks on their doors then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The victim had not recently changed the locks on their doors
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a witness claimed to have seen the suspect with a bloody shirt on the night of the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a witness claimed to have seen the suspect with a bloody shirt on the night of the murder, therefore the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a witness claimed to have seen the suspect with a bloody shirt on the night of the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A witness claimed to have seen the suspect with a bloody shirt on the night of the murder
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a witness claimed to have seen the suspect with a bloody shirt on the night of the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a witness claimed to have seen the suspect with a bloody shirt on the night of the murder, hence the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a witness claimed to have seen the suspect with a bloody shirt on the night of the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A witness claimed to have seen the suspect with a bloody shirt on the night of the murder
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a witness claimed to have seen the suspect with a bloody shirt on the night of the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a witness claimed to have seen the suspect with a bloody shirt on the night of the murder, thus the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a witness claimed to have seen the suspect with a bloody shirt on the night of the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A witness claimed to have seen the suspect with a bloody shirt on the night of the murder
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a witness claimed to have seen the suspect with a bloody shirt on the night of the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a witness claimed to have seen the suspect with a bloody shirt on the night of the murder, so it can be concluded that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a witness claimed to have seen the suspect with a bloody shirt on the night of the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A witness claimed to have seen the suspect with a bloody shirt on the night of the murder
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a witness claimed to have seen the suspect with a bloody shirt on the night of the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a witness claimed to have seen the suspect with a bloody shirt on the night of the murder, so the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a witness claimed to have seen the suspect with a bloody shirt on the night of the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A witness claimed to have seen the suspect with a bloody shirt on the night of the murder
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a witness claimed to have seen the suspect with a bloody shirt on the night of the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a witness claimed to have seen the suspect with a bloody shirt on the night of the murder, which implies that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a witness claimed to have seen the suspect with a bloody shirt on the night of the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A witness claimed to have seen the suspect with a bloody shirt on the night of the murder
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a witness claimed to have seen the suspect with a bloody shirt on the night of the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a witness claimed to have seen the suspect with a bloody shirt on the night of the murder, which shows that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a witness claimed to have seen the suspect with a bloody shirt on the night of the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A witness claimed to have seen the suspect with a bloody shirt on the night of the murder
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a witness claimed to have seen the suspect with a bloody shirt on the night of the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a witness claimed to have seen the suspect with a bloody shirt on the night of the murder, which establishes that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a witness claimed to have seen the suspect with a bloody shirt on the night of the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A witness claimed to have seen the suspect with a bloody shirt on the night of the murder
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, since if a witness claimed to have seen the suspect with a bloody shirt on the night of the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and a witness claimed to have seen the suspect with a bloody shirt on the night of the murder.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a witness claimed to have seen the suspect with a bloody shirt on the night of the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A witness claimed to have seen the suspect with a bloody shirt on the night of the murder
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, because if a witness claimed to have seen the suspect with a bloody shirt on the night of the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and a witness claimed to have seen the suspect with a bloody shirt on the night of the murder.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a witness claimed to have seen the suspect with a bloody shirt on the night of the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A witness claimed to have seen the suspect with a bloody shirt on the night of the murder
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, as if a witness claimed to have seen the suspect with a bloody shirt on the night of the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and a witness claimed to have seen the suspect with a bloody shirt on the night of the murder.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a witness claimed to have seen the suspect with a bloody shirt on the night of the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A witness claimed to have seen the suspect with a bloody shirt on the night of the murder
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a witness claimed to have seen the suspect with a bloody shirt on the night of the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, therefore no witness claimed to have seen the suspect with a bloody shirt on the night of the murder.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a witness claimed to have seen the suspect with a bloody shirt on the night of the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: No witness claimed to have seen the suspect with a bloody shirt on the night of the murder
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a witness claimed to have seen the suspect with a bloody shirt on the night of the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, hence no witness claimed to have seen the suspect with a bloody shirt on the night of the murder.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a witness claimed to have seen the suspect with a bloody shirt on the night of the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: No witness claimed to have seen the suspect with a bloody shirt on the night of the murder
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a witness claimed to have seen the suspect with a bloody shirt on the night of the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, thus no witness claimed to have seen the suspect with a bloody shirt on the night of the murder.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a witness claimed to have seen the suspect with a bloody shirt on the night of the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: No witness claimed to have seen the suspect with a bloody shirt on the night of the murder
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a witness claimed to have seen the suspect with a bloody shirt on the night of the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, so it can be concluded that no witness claimed to have seen the suspect with a bloody shirt on the night of the murder.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a witness claimed to have seen the suspect with a bloody shirt on the night of the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: No witness claimed to have seen the suspect with a bloody shirt on the night of the murder
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a witness claimed to have seen the suspect with a bloody shirt on the night of the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, so no witness claimed to have seen the suspect with a bloody shirt on the night of the murder.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a witness claimed to have seen the suspect with a bloody shirt on the night of the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: No witness claimed to have seen the suspect with a bloody shirt on the night of the murder
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a witness claimed to have seen the suspect with a bloody shirt on the night of the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which implies that no witness claimed to have seen the suspect with a bloody shirt on the night of the murder.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a witness claimed to have seen the suspect with a bloody shirt on the night of the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: No witness claimed to have seen the suspect with a bloody shirt on the night of the murder
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a witness claimed to have seen the suspect with a bloody shirt on the night of the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which shows that no witness claimed to have seen the suspect with a bloody shirt on the night of the murder.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a witness claimed to have seen the suspect with a bloody shirt on the night of the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: No witness claimed to have seen the suspect with a bloody shirt on the night of the murder
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a witness claimed to have seen the suspect with a bloody shirt on the night of the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which establishes that no witness claimed to have seen the suspect with a bloody shirt on the night of the murder.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a witness claimed to have seen the suspect with a bloody shirt on the night of the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: No witness claimed to have seen the suspect with a bloody shirt on the night of the murder
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```No witness claimed to have seen the suspect with a bloody shirt on the night of the murder, since if a witness claimed to have seen the suspect with a bloody shirt on the night of the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a witness claimed to have seen the suspect with a bloody shirt on the night of the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: No witness claimed to have seen the suspect with a bloody shirt on the night of the murder
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```No witness claimed to have seen the suspect with a bloody shirt on the night of the murder, because if a witness claimed to have seen the suspect with a bloody shirt on the night of the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a witness claimed to have seen the suspect with a bloody shirt on the night of the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: No witness claimed to have seen the suspect with a bloody shirt on the night of the murder
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```No witness claimed to have seen the suspect with a bloody shirt on the night of the murder, as if a witness claimed to have seen the suspect with a bloody shirt on the night of the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a witness claimed to have seen the suspect with a bloody shirt on the night of the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: No witness claimed to have seen the suspect with a bloody shirt on the night of the murder
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a neighbor reported hearing a loud crash coming from the victim's apartment then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a neighbor reported hearing a loud crash coming from the victim's apartment, therefore the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a neighbor reported hearing a loud crash coming from the victim's apartment then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A neighbor reported hearing a loud crash coming from the victim's apartment
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a neighbor reported hearing a loud crash coming from the victim's apartment then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a neighbor reported hearing a loud crash coming from the victim's apartment, hence the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a neighbor reported hearing a loud crash coming from the victim's apartment then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A neighbor reported hearing a loud crash coming from the victim's apartment
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a neighbor reported hearing a loud crash coming from the victim's apartment then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a neighbor reported hearing a loud crash coming from the victim's apartment, thus the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a neighbor reported hearing a loud crash coming from the victim's apartment then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A neighbor reported hearing a loud crash coming from the victim's apartment
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a neighbor reported hearing a loud crash coming from the victim's apartment then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a neighbor reported hearing a loud crash coming from the victim's apartment, so it can be concluded that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a neighbor reported hearing a loud crash coming from the victim's apartment then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A neighbor reported hearing a loud crash coming from the victim's apartment
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a neighbor reported hearing a loud crash coming from the victim's apartment then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a neighbor reported hearing a loud crash coming from the victim's apartment, so the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a neighbor reported hearing a loud crash coming from the victim's apartment then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A neighbor reported hearing a loud crash coming from the victim's apartment
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a neighbor reported hearing a loud crash coming from the victim's apartment then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a neighbor reported hearing a loud crash coming from the victim's apartment, which implies that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a neighbor reported hearing a loud crash coming from the victim's apartment then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A neighbor reported hearing a loud crash coming from the victim's apartment
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a neighbor reported hearing a loud crash coming from the victim's apartment then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a neighbor reported hearing a loud crash coming from the victim's apartment, which shows that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a neighbor reported hearing a loud crash coming from the victim's apartment then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A neighbor reported hearing a loud crash coming from the victim's apartment
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a neighbor reported hearing a loud crash coming from the victim's apartment then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a neighbor reported hearing a loud crash coming from the victim's apartment, which establishes that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a neighbor reported hearing a loud crash coming from the victim's apartment then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A neighbor reported hearing a loud crash coming from the victim's apartment
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, since if a neighbor reported hearing a loud crash coming from the victim's apartment then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and a neighbor reported hearing a loud crash coming from the victim's apartment.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a neighbor reported hearing a loud crash coming from the victim's apartment then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A neighbor reported hearing a loud crash coming from the victim's apartment
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, because if a neighbor reported hearing a loud crash coming from the victim's apartment then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and a neighbor reported hearing a loud crash coming from the victim's apartment.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a neighbor reported hearing a loud crash coming from the victim's apartment then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A neighbor reported hearing a loud crash coming from the victim's apartment
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, as if a neighbor reported hearing a loud crash coming from the victim's apartment then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and a neighbor reported hearing a loud crash coming from the victim's apartment.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a neighbor reported hearing a loud crash coming from the victim's apartment then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A neighbor reported hearing a loud crash coming from the victim's apartment
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a neighbor reported hearing a loud crash coming from the victim's apartment then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, therefore no neighbor reported hearing a loud crash coming from the victim's apartment.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a neighbor reported hearing a loud crash coming from the victim's apartment then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: No neighbor reported hearing a loud crash coming from the victim's apartment
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a neighbor reported hearing a loud crash coming from the victim's apartment then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, hence no neighbor reported hearing a loud crash coming from the victim's apartment.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a neighbor reported hearing a loud crash coming from the victim's apartment then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: No neighbor reported hearing a loud crash coming from the victim's apartment
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a neighbor reported hearing a loud crash coming from the victim's apartment then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, thus no neighbor reported hearing a loud crash coming from the victim's apartment.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a neighbor reported hearing a loud crash coming from the victim's apartment then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: No neighbor reported hearing a loud crash coming from the victim's apartment
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a neighbor reported hearing a loud crash coming from the victim's apartment then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, so it can be concluded that no neighbor reported hearing a loud crash coming from the victim's apartment.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a neighbor reported hearing a loud crash coming from the victim's apartment then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: No neighbor reported hearing a loud crash coming from the victim's apartment
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a neighbor reported hearing a loud crash coming from the victim's apartment then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, so no neighbor reported hearing a loud crash coming from the victim's apartment.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a neighbor reported hearing a loud crash coming from the victim's apartment then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: No neighbor reported hearing a loud crash coming from the victim's apartment
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a neighbor reported hearing a loud crash coming from the victim's apartment then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which implies that no neighbor reported hearing a loud crash coming from the victim's apartment.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a neighbor reported hearing a loud crash coming from the victim's apartment then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: No neighbor reported hearing a loud crash coming from the victim's apartment
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a neighbor reported hearing a loud crash coming from the victim's apartment then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which shows that no neighbor reported hearing a loud crash coming from the victim's apartment.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a neighbor reported hearing a loud crash coming from the victim's apartment then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: No neighbor reported hearing a loud crash coming from the victim's apartment
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a neighbor reported hearing a loud crash coming from the victim's apartment then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which establishes that no neighbor reported hearing a loud crash coming from the victim's apartment.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a neighbor reported hearing a loud crash coming from the victim's apartment then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: No neighbor reported hearing a loud crash coming from the victim's apartment
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```No neighbor reported hearing a loud crash coming from the victim's apartment, since if a neighbor reported hearing a loud crash coming from the victim's apartment then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a neighbor reported hearing a loud crash coming from the victim's apartment then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: No neighbor reported hearing a loud crash coming from the victim's apartment
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```No neighbor reported hearing a loud crash coming from the victim's apartment, because if a neighbor reported hearing a loud crash coming from the victim's apartment then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a neighbor reported hearing a loud crash coming from the victim's apartment then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: No neighbor reported hearing a loud crash coming from the victim's apartment
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```No neighbor reported hearing a loud crash coming from the victim's apartment, as if a neighbor reported hearing a loud crash coming from the victim's apartment then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a neighbor reported hearing a loud crash coming from the victim's apartment then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: No neighbor reported hearing a loud crash coming from the victim's apartment
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the suspect's fingerprints were found on a glass in the victim's kitchen then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the suspect's fingerprints were found on a glass in the victim's kitchen, therefore the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect's fingerprints were found on a glass in the victim's kitchen then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The suspect's fingerprints were found on a glass in the victim's kitchen
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the suspect's fingerprints were found on a glass in the victim's kitchen then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the suspect's fingerprints were found on a glass in the victim's kitchen, hence the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect's fingerprints were found on a glass in the victim's kitchen then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The suspect's fingerprints were found on a glass in the victim's kitchen
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the suspect's fingerprints were found on a glass in the victim's kitchen then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the suspect's fingerprints were found on a glass in the victim's kitchen, thus the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect's fingerprints were found on a glass in the victim's kitchen then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The suspect's fingerprints were found on a glass in the victim's kitchen
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the suspect's fingerprints were found on a glass in the victim's kitchen then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the suspect's fingerprints were found on a glass in the victim's kitchen, so it can be concluded that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect's fingerprints were found on a glass in the victim's kitchen then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The suspect's fingerprints were found on a glass in the victim's kitchen
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the suspect's fingerprints were found on a glass in the victim's kitchen then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the suspect's fingerprints were found on a glass in the victim's kitchen, so the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect's fingerprints were found on a glass in the victim's kitchen then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The suspect's fingerprints were found on a glass in the victim's kitchen
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the suspect's fingerprints were found on a glass in the victim's kitchen then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the suspect's fingerprints were found on a glass in the victim's kitchen, which implies that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect's fingerprints were found on a glass in the victim's kitchen then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The suspect's fingerprints were found on a glass in the victim's kitchen
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the suspect's fingerprints were found on a glass in the victim's kitchen then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the suspect's fingerprints were found on a glass in the victim's kitchen, which shows that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect's fingerprints were found on a glass in the victim's kitchen then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The suspect's fingerprints were found on a glass in the victim's kitchen
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the suspect's fingerprints were found on a glass in the victim's kitchen then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the suspect's fingerprints were found on a glass in the victim's kitchen, which establishes that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect's fingerprints were found on a glass in the victim's kitchen then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The suspect's fingerprints were found on a glass in the victim's kitchen
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, since if the suspect's fingerprints were found on a glass in the victim's kitchen then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the suspect's fingerprints were found on a glass in the victim's kitchen.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect's fingerprints were found on a glass in the victim's kitchen then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The suspect's fingerprints were found on a glass in the victim's kitchen
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, because if the suspect's fingerprints were found on a glass in the victim's kitchen then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the suspect's fingerprints were found on a glass in the victim's kitchen.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect's fingerprints were found on a glass in the victim's kitchen then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The suspect's fingerprints were found on a glass in the victim's kitchen
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, as if the suspect's fingerprints were found on a glass in the victim's kitchen then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the suspect's fingerprints were found on a glass in the victim's kitchen.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect's fingerprints were found on a glass in the victim's kitchen then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The suspect's fingerprints were found on a glass in the victim's kitchen
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the suspect's fingerprints were found on a glass in the victim's kitchen then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, therefore the suspect's fingerprints were not found on a glass in the victim's kitchen.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect's fingerprints were found on a glass in the victim's kitchen then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The suspect's fingerprints were not found on a glass in the victim's kitchen
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the suspect's fingerprints were found on a glass in the victim's kitchen then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, hence the suspect's fingerprints were not found on a glass in the victim's kitchen.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect's fingerprints were found on a glass in the victim's kitchen then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The suspect's fingerprints were not found on a glass in the victim's kitchen
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the suspect's fingerprints were found on a glass in the victim's kitchen then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, thus the suspect's fingerprints were not found on a glass in the victim's kitchen.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect's fingerprints were found on a glass in the victim's kitchen then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The suspect's fingerprints were not found on a glass in the victim's kitchen
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the suspect's fingerprints were found on a glass in the victim's kitchen then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, so it can be concluded that the suspect's fingerprints were not found on a glass in the victim's kitchen.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect's fingerprints were found on a glass in the victim's kitchen then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The suspect's fingerprints were not found on a glass in the victim's kitchen
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the suspect's fingerprints were found on a glass in the victim's kitchen then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, so the suspect's fingerprints were not found on a glass in the victim's kitchen.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect's fingerprints were found on a glass in the victim's kitchen then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The suspect's fingerprints were not found on a glass in the victim's kitchen
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the suspect's fingerprints were found on a glass in the victim's kitchen then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which implies that the suspect's fingerprints were not found on a glass in the victim's kitchen.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect's fingerprints were found on a glass in the victim's kitchen then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The suspect's fingerprints were not found on a glass in the victim's kitchen
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the suspect's fingerprints were found on a glass in the victim's kitchen then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which shows that the suspect's fingerprints were not found on a glass in the victim's kitchen.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect's fingerprints were found on a glass in the victim's kitchen then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The suspect's fingerprints were not found on a glass in the victim's kitchen
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the suspect's fingerprints were found on a glass in the victim's kitchen then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which establishes that the suspect's fingerprints were not found on a glass in the victim's kitchen.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect's fingerprints were found on a glass in the victim's kitchen then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The suspect's fingerprints were not found on a glass in the victim's kitchen
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The suspect's fingerprints were not found on a glass in the victim's kitchen, since if the suspect's fingerprints were found on a glass in the victim's kitchen then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect's fingerprints were found on a glass in the victim's kitchen then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The suspect's fingerprints were not found on a glass in the victim's kitchen
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The suspect's fingerprints were not found on a glass in the victim's kitchen, because if the suspect's fingerprints were found on a glass in the victim's kitchen then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect's fingerprints were found on a glass in the victim's kitchen then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The suspect's fingerprints were not found on a glass in the victim's kitchen
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The suspect's fingerprints were not found on a glass in the victim's kitchen, as if the suspect's fingerprints were found on a glass in the victim's kitchen then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect's fingerprints were found on a glass in the victim's kitchen then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The suspect's fingerprints were not found on a glass in the victim's kitchen
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim's office safe had been tampered with, but its contents remained intact then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the victim's office safe had been tampered with, but its contents remained intact, therefore the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's office safe had been tampered with, but its contents remained intact then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The victim's office safe had been tampered with, but its contents remained intact
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim's office safe had been tampered with, but its contents remained intact then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the victim's office safe had been tampered with, but its contents remained intact, hence the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's office safe had been tampered with, but its contents remained intact then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The victim's office safe had been tampered with, but its contents remained intact
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim's office safe had been tampered with, but its contents remained intact then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the victim's office safe had been tampered with, but its contents remained intact, thus the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's office safe had been tampered with, but its contents remained intact then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The victim's office safe had been tampered with, but its contents remained intact
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim's office safe had been tampered with, but its contents remained intact then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the victim's office safe had been tampered with, but its contents remained intact, so it can be concluded that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's office safe had been tampered with, but its contents remained intact then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The victim's office safe had been tampered with, but its contents remained intact
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim's office safe had been tampered with, but its contents remained intact then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the victim's office safe had been tampered with, but its contents remained intact, so the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's office safe had been tampered with, but its contents remained intact then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The victim's office safe had been tampered with, but its contents remained intact
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim's office safe had been tampered with, but its contents remained intact then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the victim's office safe had been tampered with, but its contents remained intact, which implies that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's office safe had been tampered with, but its contents remained intact then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The victim's office safe had been tampered with, but its contents remained intact
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim's office safe had been tampered with, but its contents remained intact then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the victim's office safe had been tampered with, but its contents remained intact, which shows that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's office safe had been tampered with, but its contents remained intact then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The victim's office safe had been tampered with, but its contents remained intact
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim's office safe had been tampered with, but its contents remained intact then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the victim's office safe had been tampered with, but its contents remained intact, which establishes that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's office safe had been tampered with, but its contents remained intact then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The victim's office safe had been tampered with, but its contents remained intact
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, since if the victim's office safe had been tampered with, but its contents remained intact then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the victim's office safe had been tampered with, but its contents remained intact.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's office safe had been tampered with, but its contents remained intact then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The victim's office safe had been tampered with, but its contents remained intact
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, because if the victim's office safe had been tampered with, but its contents remained intact then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the victim's office safe had been tampered with, but its contents remained intact.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's office safe had been tampered with, but its contents remained intact then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The victim's office safe had been tampered with, but its contents remained intact
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, as if the victim's office safe had been tampered with, but its contents remained intact then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the victim's office safe had been tampered with, but its contents remained intact.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's office safe had been tampered with, but its contents remained intact then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The victim's office safe had been tampered with, but its contents remained intact
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim's office safe had been tampered with, but its contents remained intact then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, therefore the victim's office safe had not been tampered with, and its contents remained intact.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's office safe had been tampered with, but its contents remained intact then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The victim's office safe had not been tampered with, and its contents remained intact
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim's office safe had been tampered with, but its contents remained intact then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, hence the victim's office safe had not been tampered with, and its contents remained intact.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's office safe had been tampered with, but its contents remained intact then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The victim's office safe had not been tampered with, and its contents remained intact
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.