<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street, and officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene, therefore the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
stringlengths 355
1.02k
|
|---|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```No security guard reported seeing the suspect acting suspiciously near the crime scene, as if a security guard reported seeing the suspect acting suspiciously near the crime scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a security guard reported seeing the suspect acting suspiciously near the crime scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: No security guard reported seeing the suspect acting suspiciously near the crime scene
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a hidden camera captured the suspect searching the victim's office then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a hidden camera captured the suspect searching the victim's office, therefore the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a hidden camera captured the suspect searching the victim's office then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A hidden camera captured the suspect searching the victim's office
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a hidden camera captured the suspect searching the victim's office then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a hidden camera captured the suspect searching the victim's office, hence the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a hidden camera captured the suspect searching the victim's office then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A hidden camera captured the suspect searching the victim's office
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a hidden camera captured the suspect searching the victim's office then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a hidden camera captured the suspect searching the victim's office, thus the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a hidden camera captured the suspect searching the victim's office then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A hidden camera captured the suspect searching the victim's office
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a hidden camera captured the suspect searching the victim's office then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a hidden camera captured the suspect searching the victim's office, so it can be concluded that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a hidden camera captured the suspect searching the victim's office then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A hidden camera captured the suspect searching the victim's office
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a hidden camera captured the suspect searching the victim's office then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a hidden camera captured the suspect searching the victim's office, so the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a hidden camera captured the suspect searching the victim's office then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A hidden camera captured the suspect searching the victim's office
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a hidden camera captured the suspect searching the victim's office then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a hidden camera captured the suspect searching the victim's office, which implies that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a hidden camera captured the suspect searching the victim's office then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A hidden camera captured the suspect searching the victim's office
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a hidden camera captured the suspect searching the victim's office then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a hidden camera captured the suspect searching the victim's office, which shows that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a hidden camera captured the suspect searching the victim's office then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A hidden camera captured the suspect searching the victim's office
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a hidden camera captured the suspect searching the victim's office then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a hidden camera captured the suspect searching the victim's office, which establishes that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a hidden camera captured the suspect searching the victim's office then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A hidden camera captured the suspect searching the victim's office
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, since if a hidden camera captured the suspect searching the victim's office then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and a hidden camera captured the suspect searching the victim's office.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a hidden camera captured the suspect searching the victim's office then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A hidden camera captured the suspect searching the victim's office
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, because if a hidden camera captured the suspect searching the victim's office then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and a hidden camera captured the suspect searching the victim's office.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a hidden camera captured the suspect searching the victim's office then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A hidden camera captured the suspect searching the victim's office
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, as if a hidden camera captured the suspect searching the victim's office then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and a hidden camera captured the suspect searching the victim's office.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a hidden camera captured the suspect searching the victim's office then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A hidden camera captured the suspect searching the victim's office
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a hidden camera captured the suspect searching the victim's office then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, therefore no hidden camera captured the suspect searching the victim's office.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a hidden camera captured the suspect searching the victim's office then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: No hidden camera captured the suspect searching the victim's office
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a hidden camera captured the suspect searching the victim's office then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, hence no hidden camera captured the suspect searching the victim's office.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a hidden camera captured the suspect searching the victim's office then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: No hidden camera captured the suspect searching the victim's office
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a hidden camera captured the suspect searching the victim's office then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, thus no hidden camera captured the suspect searching the victim's office.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a hidden camera captured the suspect searching the victim's office then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: No hidden camera captured the suspect searching the victim's office
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a hidden camera captured the suspect searching the victim's office then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, so it can be concluded that no hidden camera captured the suspect searching the victim's office.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a hidden camera captured the suspect searching the victim's office then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: No hidden camera captured the suspect searching the victim's office
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a hidden camera captured the suspect searching the victim's office then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, so no hidden camera captured the suspect searching the victim's office.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a hidden camera captured the suspect searching the victim's office then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: No hidden camera captured the suspect searching the victim's office
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a hidden camera captured the suspect searching the victim's office then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which implies that no hidden camera captured the suspect searching the victim's office.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a hidden camera captured the suspect searching the victim's office then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: No hidden camera captured the suspect searching the victim's office
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a hidden camera captured the suspect searching the victim's office then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which shows that no hidden camera captured the suspect searching the victim's office.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a hidden camera captured the suspect searching the victim's office then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: No hidden camera captured the suspect searching the victim's office
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a hidden camera captured the suspect searching the victim's office then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which establishes that no hidden camera captured the suspect searching the victim's office.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a hidden camera captured the suspect searching the victim's office then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: No hidden camera captured the suspect searching the victim's office
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```No hidden camera captured the suspect searching the victim's office, since if a hidden camera captured the suspect searching the victim's office then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a hidden camera captured the suspect searching the victim's office then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: No hidden camera captured the suspect searching the victim's office
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```No hidden camera captured the suspect searching the victim's office, because if a hidden camera captured the suspect searching the victim's office then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a hidden camera captured the suspect searching the victim's office then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: No hidden camera captured the suspect searching the victim's office
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```No hidden camera captured the suspect searching the victim's office, as if a hidden camera captured the suspect searching the victim's office then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a hidden camera captured the suspect searching the victim's office then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: No hidden camera captured the suspect searching the victim's office
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a diary entry in the victim's handwriting hinted at a secret affair then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a diary entry in the victim's handwriting hinted at a secret affair, therefore the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a diary entry in the victim's handwriting hinted at a secret affair then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A diary entry in the victim's handwriting hinted at a secret affair
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a diary entry in the victim's handwriting hinted at a secret affair then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a diary entry in the victim's handwriting hinted at a secret affair, hence the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a diary entry in the victim's handwriting hinted at a secret affair then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A diary entry in the victim's handwriting hinted at a secret affair
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a diary entry in the victim's handwriting hinted at a secret affair then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a diary entry in the victim's handwriting hinted at a secret affair, thus the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a diary entry in the victim's handwriting hinted at a secret affair then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A diary entry in the victim's handwriting hinted at a secret affair
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a diary entry in the victim's handwriting hinted at a secret affair then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a diary entry in the victim's handwriting hinted at a secret affair, so it can be concluded that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a diary entry in the victim's handwriting hinted at a secret affair then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A diary entry in the victim's handwriting hinted at a secret affair
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a diary entry in the victim's handwriting hinted at a secret affair then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a diary entry in the victim's handwriting hinted at a secret affair, so the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a diary entry in the victim's handwriting hinted at a secret affair then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A diary entry in the victim's handwriting hinted at a secret affair
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a diary entry in the victim's handwriting hinted at a secret affair then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a diary entry in the victim's handwriting hinted at a secret affair, which implies that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a diary entry in the victim's handwriting hinted at a secret affair then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A diary entry in the victim's handwriting hinted at a secret affair
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a diary entry in the victim's handwriting hinted at a secret affair then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a diary entry in the victim's handwriting hinted at a secret affair, which shows that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a diary entry in the victim's handwriting hinted at a secret affair then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A diary entry in the victim's handwriting hinted at a secret affair
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a diary entry in the victim's handwriting hinted at a secret affair then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a diary entry in the victim's handwriting hinted at a secret affair, which establishes that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a diary entry in the victim's handwriting hinted at a secret affair then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A diary entry in the victim's handwriting hinted at a secret affair
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, since if a diary entry in the victim's handwriting hinted at a secret affair then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and a diary entry in the victim's handwriting hinted at a secret affair.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a diary entry in the victim's handwriting hinted at a secret affair then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A diary entry in the victim's handwriting hinted at a secret affair
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, because if a diary entry in the victim's handwriting hinted at a secret affair then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and a diary entry in the victim's handwriting hinted at a secret affair.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a diary entry in the victim's handwriting hinted at a secret affair then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A diary entry in the victim's handwriting hinted at a secret affair
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, as if a diary entry in the victim's handwriting hinted at a secret affair then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and a diary entry in the victim's handwriting hinted at a secret affair.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a diary entry in the victim's handwriting hinted at a secret affair then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A diary entry in the victim's handwriting hinted at a secret affair
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a diary entry in the victim's handwriting hinted at a secret affair then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, therefore a diary entry in the victim's handwriting did not hint at a secret affair.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a diary entry in the victim's handwriting hinted at a secret affair then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: A diary entry in the victim's handwriting did not hint at a secret affair
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a diary entry in the victim's handwriting hinted at a secret affair then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, hence a diary entry in the victim's handwriting did not hint at a secret affair.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a diary entry in the victim's handwriting hinted at a secret affair then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: A diary entry in the victim's handwriting did not hint at a secret affair
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a diary entry in the victim's handwriting hinted at a secret affair then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, thus a diary entry in the victim's handwriting did not hint at a secret affair.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a diary entry in the victim's handwriting hinted at a secret affair then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: A diary entry in the victim's handwriting did not hint at a secret affair
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a diary entry in the victim's handwriting hinted at a secret affair then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, so it can be concluded that a diary entry in the victim's handwriting did not hint at a secret affair.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a diary entry in the victim's handwriting hinted at a secret affair then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: A diary entry in the victim's handwriting did not hint at a secret affair
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a diary entry in the victim's handwriting hinted at a secret affair then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, so a diary entry in the victim's handwriting did not hint at a secret affair.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a diary entry in the victim's handwriting hinted at a secret affair then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: A diary entry in the victim's handwriting did not hint at a secret affair
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a diary entry in the victim's handwriting hinted at a secret affair then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which implies that a diary entry in the victim's handwriting did not hint at a secret affair.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a diary entry in the victim's handwriting hinted at a secret affair then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: A diary entry in the victim's handwriting did not hint at a secret affair
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a diary entry in the victim's handwriting hinted at a secret affair then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which shows that a diary entry in the victim's handwriting did not hint at a secret affair.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a diary entry in the victim's handwriting hinted at a secret affair then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: A diary entry in the victim's handwriting did not hint at a secret affair
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a diary entry in the victim's handwriting hinted at a secret affair then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which establishes that a diary entry in the victim's handwriting did not hint at a secret affair.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a diary entry in the victim's handwriting hinted at a secret affair then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: A diary entry in the victim's handwriting did not hint at a secret affair
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```A diary entry in the victim's handwriting did not hint at a secret affair, since if a diary entry in the victim's handwriting hinted at a secret affair then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a diary entry in the victim's handwriting hinted at a secret affair then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: A diary entry in the victim's handwriting did not hint at a secret affair
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```A diary entry in the victim's handwriting did not hint at a secret affair, because if a diary entry in the victim's handwriting hinted at a secret affair then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a diary entry in the victim's handwriting hinted at a secret affair then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: A diary entry in the victim's handwriting did not hint at a secret affair
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```A diary entry in the victim's handwriting did not hint at a secret affair, as if a diary entry in the victim's handwriting hinted at a secret affair then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a diary entry in the victim's handwriting hinted at a secret affair then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: A diary entry in the victim's handwriting did not hint at a secret affair
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the suspect had a documented history of stalking the victim then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the suspect had a documented history of stalking the victim, therefore the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect had a documented history of stalking the victim then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The suspect had a documented history of stalking the victim
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the suspect had a documented history of stalking the victim then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the suspect had a documented history of stalking the victim, hence the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect had a documented history of stalking the victim then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The suspect had a documented history of stalking the victim
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the suspect had a documented history of stalking the victim then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the suspect had a documented history of stalking the victim, thus the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect had a documented history of stalking the victim then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The suspect had a documented history of stalking the victim
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the suspect had a documented history of stalking the victim then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the suspect had a documented history of stalking the victim, so it can be concluded that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect had a documented history of stalking the victim then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The suspect had a documented history of stalking the victim
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the suspect had a documented history of stalking the victim then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the suspect had a documented history of stalking the victim, so the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect had a documented history of stalking the victim then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The suspect had a documented history of stalking the victim
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the suspect had a documented history of stalking the victim then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the suspect had a documented history of stalking the victim, which implies that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect had a documented history of stalking the victim then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The suspect had a documented history of stalking the victim
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the suspect had a documented history of stalking the victim then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the suspect had a documented history of stalking the victim, which shows that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect had a documented history of stalking the victim then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The suspect had a documented history of stalking the victim
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the suspect had a documented history of stalking the victim then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the suspect had a documented history of stalking the victim, which establishes that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect had a documented history of stalking the victim then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The suspect had a documented history of stalking the victim
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, since if the suspect had a documented history of stalking the victim then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the suspect had a documented history of stalking the victim.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect had a documented history of stalking the victim then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The suspect had a documented history of stalking the victim
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, because if the suspect had a documented history of stalking the victim then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the suspect had a documented history of stalking the victim.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect had a documented history of stalking the victim then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The suspect had a documented history of stalking the victim
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, as if the suspect had a documented history of stalking the victim then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the suspect had a documented history of stalking the victim.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect had a documented history of stalking the victim then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The suspect had a documented history of stalking the victim
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the suspect had a documented history of stalking the victim then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, therefore the suspect did not have a documented history of stalking the victim.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect had a documented history of stalking the victim then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The suspect did not have a documented history of stalking the victim
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the suspect had a documented history of stalking the victim then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, hence the suspect did not have a documented history of stalking the victim.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect had a documented history of stalking the victim then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The suspect did not have a documented history of stalking the victim
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the suspect had a documented history of stalking the victim then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, thus the suspect did not have a documented history of stalking the victim.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect had a documented history of stalking the victim then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The suspect did not have a documented history of stalking the victim
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the suspect had a documented history of stalking the victim then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, so it can be concluded that the suspect did not have a documented history of stalking the victim.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect had a documented history of stalking the victim then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The suspect did not have a documented history of stalking the victim
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the suspect had a documented history of stalking the victim then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, so the suspect did not have a documented history of stalking the victim.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect had a documented history of stalking the victim then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The suspect did not have a documented history of stalking the victim
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the suspect had a documented history of stalking the victim then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which implies that the suspect did not have a documented history of stalking the victim.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect had a documented history of stalking the victim then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The suspect did not have a documented history of stalking the victim
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the suspect had a documented history of stalking the victim then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which shows that the suspect did not have a documented history of stalking the victim.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect had a documented history of stalking the victim then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The suspect did not have a documented history of stalking the victim
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the suspect had a documented history of stalking the victim then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which establishes that the suspect did not have a documented history of stalking the victim.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect had a documented history of stalking the victim then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The suspect did not have a documented history of stalking the victim
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The suspect did not have a documented history of stalking the victim, since if the suspect had a documented history of stalking the victim then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect had a documented history of stalking the victim then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The suspect did not have a documented history of stalking the victim
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The suspect did not have a documented history of stalking the victim, because if the suspect had a documented history of stalking the victim then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect had a documented history of stalking the victim then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The suspect did not have a documented history of stalking the victim
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The suspect did not have a documented history of stalking the victim, as if the suspect had a documented history of stalking the victim then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect had a documented history of stalking the victim then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The suspect did not have a documented history of stalking the victim
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim's missing laptop contained sensitive financial information then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the victim's missing laptop contained sensitive financial information, therefore the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's missing laptop contained sensitive financial information then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The victim's missing laptop contained sensitive financial information
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim's missing laptop contained sensitive financial information then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the victim's missing laptop contained sensitive financial information, hence the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's missing laptop contained sensitive financial information then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The victim's missing laptop contained sensitive financial information
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim's missing laptop contained sensitive financial information then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the victim's missing laptop contained sensitive financial information, thus the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's missing laptop contained sensitive financial information then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The victim's missing laptop contained sensitive financial information
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim's missing laptop contained sensitive financial information then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the victim's missing laptop contained sensitive financial information, so it can be concluded that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's missing laptop contained sensitive financial information then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The victim's missing laptop contained sensitive financial information
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim's missing laptop contained sensitive financial information then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the victim's missing laptop contained sensitive financial information, so the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's missing laptop contained sensitive financial information then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The victim's missing laptop contained sensitive financial information
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim's missing laptop contained sensitive financial information then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the victim's missing laptop contained sensitive financial information, which implies that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's missing laptop contained sensitive financial information then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The victim's missing laptop contained sensitive financial information
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim's missing laptop contained sensitive financial information then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the victim's missing laptop contained sensitive financial information, which shows that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's missing laptop contained sensitive financial information then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The victim's missing laptop contained sensitive financial information
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim's missing laptop contained sensitive financial information then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the victim's missing laptop contained sensitive financial information, which establishes that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's missing laptop contained sensitive financial information then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The victim's missing laptop contained sensitive financial information
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, since if the victim's missing laptop contained sensitive financial information then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the victim's missing laptop contained sensitive financial information.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's missing laptop contained sensitive financial information then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The victim's missing laptop contained sensitive financial information
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, because if the victim's missing laptop contained sensitive financial information then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the victim's missing laptop contained sensitive financial information.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's missing laptop contained sensitive financial information then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The victim's missing laptop contained sensitive financial information
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, as if the victim's missing laptop contained sensitive financial information then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the victim's missing laptop contained sensitive financial information.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's missing laptop contained sensitive financial information then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The victim's missing laptop contained sensitive financial information
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim's missing laptop contained sensitive financial information then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, therefore the victim's missing laptop did not contain sensitive financial information.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's missing laptop contained sensitive financial information then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The victim's missing laptop did not contain sensitive financial information
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim's missing laptop contained sensitive financial information then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, hence the victim's missing laptop did not contain sensitive financial information.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's missing laptop contained sensitive financial information then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The victim's missing laptop did not contain sensitive financial information
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim's missing laptop contained sensitive financial information then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, thus the victim's missing laptop did not contain sensitive financial information.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's missing laptop contained sensitive financial information then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The victim's missing laptop did not contain sensitive financial information
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim's missing laptop contained sensitive financial information then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, so it can be concluded that the victim's missing laptop did not contain sensitive financial information.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's missing laptop contained sensitive financial information then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The victim's missing laptop did not contain sensitive financial information
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim's missing laptop contained sensitive financial information then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, so the victim's missing laptop did not contain sensitive financial information.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's missing laptop contained sensitive financial information then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The victim's missing laptop did not contain sensitive financial information
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim's missing laptop contained sensitive financial information then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which implies that the victim's missing laptop did not contain sensitive financial information.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's missing laptop contained sensitive financial information then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The victim's missing laptop did not contain sensitive financial information
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim's missing laptop contained sensitive financial information then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which shows that the victim's missing laptop did not contain sensitive financial information.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's missing laptop contained sensitive financial information then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The victim's missing laptop did not contain sensitive financial information
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim's missing laptop contained sensitive financial information then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which establishes that the victim's missing laptop did not contain sensitive financial information.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's missing laptop contained sensitive financial information then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The victim's missing laptop did not contain sensitive financial information
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The victim's missing laptop did not contain sensitive financial information, since if the victim's missing laptop contained sensitive financial information then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's missing laptop contained sensitive financial information then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The victim's missing laptop did not contain sensitive financial information
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The victim's missing laptop did not contain sensitive financial information, because if the victim's missing laptop contained sensitive financial information then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's missing laptop contained sensitive financial information then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The victim's missing laptop did not contain sensitive financial information
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The victim's missing laptop did not contain sensitive financial information, as if the victim's missing laptop contained sensitive financial information then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's missing laptop contained sensitive financial information then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The victim's missing laptop did not contain sensitive financial information
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a mysterious note with cryptic symbols was discovered at the scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a mysterious note with cryptic symbols was discovered at the scene, therefore the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a mysterious note with cryptic symbols was discovered at the scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A mysterious note with cryptic symbols was discovered at the scene
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a mysterious note with cryptic symbols was discovered at the scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a mysterious note with cryptic symbols was discovered at the scene, hence the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a mysterious note with cryptic symbols was discovered at the scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A mysterious note with cryptic symbols was discovered at the scene
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a mysterious note with cryptic symbols was discovered at the scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a mysterious note with cryptic symbols was discovered at the scene, thus the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a mysterious note with cryptic symbols was discovered at the scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A mysterious note with cryptic symbols was discovered at the scene
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a mysterious note with cryptic symbols was discovered at the scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a mysterious note with cryptic symbols was discovered at the scene, so it can be concluded that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a mysterious note with cryptic symbols was discovered at the scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A mysterious note with cryptic symbols was discovered at the scene
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a mysterious note with cryptic symbols was discovered at the scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a mysterious note with cryptic symbols was discovered at the scene, so the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a mysterious note with cryptic symbols was discovered at the scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A mysterious note with cryptic symbols was discovered at the scene
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a mysterious note with cryptic symbols was discovered at the scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a mysterious note with cryptic symbols was discovered at the scene, which implies that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a mysterious note with cryptic symbols was discovered at the scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A mysterious note with cryptic symbols was discovered at the scene
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a mysterious note with cryptic symbols was discovered at the scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a mysterious note with cryptic symbols was discovered at the scene, which shows that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a mysterious note with cryptic symbols was discovered at the scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A mysterious note with cryptic symbols was discovered at the scene
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a mysterious note with cryptic symbols was discovered at the scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a mysterious note with cryptic symbols was discovered at the scene, which establishes that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a mysterious note with cryptic symbols was discovered at the scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A mysterious note with cryptic symbols was discovered at the scene
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, since if a mysterious note with cryptic symbols was discovered at the scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and a mysterious note with cryptic symbols was discovered at the scene.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a mysterious note with cryptic symbols was discovered at the scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A mysterious note with cryptic symbols was discovered at the scene
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, because if a mysterious note with cryptic symbols was discovered at the scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and a mysterious note with cryptic symbols was discovered at the scene.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a mysterious note with cryptic symbols was discovered at the scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A mysterious note with cryptic symbols was discovered at the scene
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, as if a mysterious note with cryptic symbols was discovered at the scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and a mysterious note with cryptic symbols was discovered at the scene.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a mysterious note with cryptic symbols was discovered at the scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A mysterious note with cryptic symbols was discovered at the scene
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.