<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street, and officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene, therefore the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
stringlengths 355
1.02k
|
|---|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```No mysterious envelope containing cash was delivered to the victim's residence, since if a mysterious envelope containing cash was delivered to the victim's residence then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a mysterious envelope containing cash was delivered to the victim's residence then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: No mysterious envelope containing cash was delivered to the victim's residence
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```No mysterious envelope containing cash was delivered to the victim's residence, because if a mysterious envelope containing cash was delivered to the victim's residence then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a mysterious envelope containing cash was delivered to the victim's residence then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: No mysterious envelope containing cash was delivered to the victim's residence
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```No mysterious envelope containing cash was delivered to the victim's residence, as if a mysterious envelope containing cash was delivered to the victim's residence then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a mysterious envelope containing cash was delivered to the victim's residence then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: No mysterious envelope containing cash was delivered to the victim's residence
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a restaurant receipt placed the suspect at a different location at the time of the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a restaurant receipt placed the suspect at a different location at the time of the murder, therefore the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a restaurant receipt placed the suspect at a different location at the time of the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A restaurant receipt placed the suspect at a different location at the time of the murder
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a restaurant receipt placed the suspect at a different location at the time of the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a restaurant receipt placed the suspect at a different location at the time of the murder, hence the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a restaurant receipt placed the suspect at a different location at the time of the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A restaurant receipt placed the suspect at a different location at the time of the murder
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a restaurant receipt placed the suspect at a different location at the time of the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a restaurant receipt placed the suspect at a different location at the time of the murder, thus the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a restaurant receipt placed the suspect at a different location at the time of the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A restaurant receipt placed the suspect at a different location at the time of the murder
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a restaurant receipt placed the suspect at a different location at the time of the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a restaurant receipt placed the suspect at a different location at the time of the murder, so it can be concluded that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a restaurant receipt placed the suspect at a different location at the time of the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A restaurant receipt placed the suspect at a different location at the time of the murder
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a restaurant receipt placed the suspect at a different location at the time of the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a restaurant receipt placed the suspect at a different location at the time of the murder, so the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a restaurant receipt placed the suspect at a different location at the time of the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A restaurant receipt placed the suspect at a different location at the time of the murder
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a restaurant receipt placed the suspect at a different location at the time of the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a restaurant receipt placed the suspect at a different location at the time of the murder, which implies that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a restaurant receipt placed the suspect at a different location at the time of the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A restaurant receipt placed the suspect at a different location at the time of the murder
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a restaurant receipt placed the suspect at a different location at the time of the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a restaurant receipt placed the suspect at a different location at the time of the murder, which shows that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a restaurant receipt placed the suspect at a different location at the time of the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A restaurant receipt placed the suspect at a different location at the time of the murder
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a restaurant receipt placed the suspect at a different location at the time of the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a restaurant receipt placed the suspect at a different location at the time of the murder, which establishes that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a restaurant receipt placed the suspect at a different location at the time of the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A restaurant receipt placed the suspect at a different location at the time of the murder
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, since if a restaurant receipt placed the suspect at a different location at the time of the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and a restaurant receipt placed the suspect at a different location at the time of the murder.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a restaurant receipt placed the suspect at a different location at the time of the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A restaurant receipt placed the suspect at a different location at the time of the murder
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, because if a restaurant receipt placed the suspect at a different location at the time of the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and a restaurant receipt placed the suspect at a different location at the time of the murder.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a restaurant receipt placed the suspect at a different location at the time of the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A restaurant receipt placed the suspect at a different location at the time of the murder
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, as if a restaurant receipt placed the suspect at a different location at the time of the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and a restaurant receipt placed the suspect at a different location at the time of the murder.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a restaurant receipt placed the suspect at a different location at the time of the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A restaurant receipt placed the suspect at a different location at the time of the murder
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a restaurant receipt placed the suspect at a different location at the time of the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, therefore a restaurant receipt did not place the suspect at a different location at the time of the murder.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a restaurant receipt placed the suspect at a different location at the time of the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: A restaurant receipt did not place the suspect at a different location at the time of the murder
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a restaurant receipt placed the suspect at a different location at the time of the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, hence a restaurant receipt did not place the suspect at a different location at the time of the murder.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a restaurant receipt placed the suspect at a different location at the time of the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: A restaurant receipt did not place the suspect at a different location at the time of the murder
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a restaurant receipt placed the suspect at a different location at the time of the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, thus a restaurant receipt did not place the suspect at a different location at the time of the murder.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a restaurant receipt placed the suspect at a different location at the time of the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: A restaurant receipt did not place the suspect at a different location at the time of the murder
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a restaurant receipt placed the suspect at a different location at the time of the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, so it can be concluded that a restaurant receipt did not place the suspect at a different location at the time of the murder.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a restaurant receipt placed the suspect at a different location at the time of the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: A restaurant receipt did not place the suspect at a different location at the time of the murder
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a restaurant receipt placed the suspect at a different location at the time of the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, so a restaurant receipt did not place the suspect at a different location at the time of the murder.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a restaurant receipt placed the suspect at a different location at the time of the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: A restaurant receipt did not place the suspect at a different location at the time of the murder
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a restaurant receipt placed the suspect at a different location at the time of the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which implies that a restaurant receipt did not place the suspect at a different location at the time of the murder.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a restaurant receipt placed the suspect at a different location at the time of the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: A restaurant receipt did not place the suspect at a different location at the time of the murder
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a restaurant receipt placed the suspect at a different location at the time of the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which shows that a restaurant receipt did not place the suspect at a different location at the time of the murder.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a restaurant receipt placed the suspect at a different location at the time of the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: A restaurant receipt did not place the suspect at a different location at the time of the murder
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a restaurant receipt placed the suspect at a different location at the time of the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which establishes that a restaurant receipt did not place the suspect at a different location at the time of the murder.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a restaurant receipt placed the suspect at a different location at the time of the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: A restaurant receipt did not place the suspect at a different location at the time of the murder
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```A restaurant receipt did not place the suspect at a different location at the time of the murder, since if a restaurant receipt placed the suspect at a different location at the time of the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a restaurant receipt placed the suspect at a different location at the time of the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: A restaurant receipt did not place the suspect at a different location at the time of the murder
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```A restaurant receipt did not place the suspect at a different location at the time of the murder, because if a restaurant receipt placed the suspect at a different location at the time of the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a restaurant receipt placed the suspect at a different location at the time of the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: A restaurant receipt did not place the suspect at a different location at the time of the murder
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```A restaurant receipt did not place the suspect at a different location at the time of the murder, as if a restaurant receipt placed the suspect at a different location at the time of the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a restaurant receipt placed the suspect at a different location at the time of the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: A restaurant receipt did not place the suspect at a different location at the time of the murder
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a toxicology report revealed the victim had been drugged prior to the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a toxicology report revealed the victim had been drugged prior to the murder, therefore the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a toxicology report revealed the victim had been drugged prior to the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A toxicology report revealed the victim had been drugged prior to the murder
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a toxicology report revealed the victim had been drugged prior to the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a toxicology report revealed the victim had been drugged prior to the murder, hence the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a toxicology report revealed the victim had been drugged prior to the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A toxicology report revealed the victim had been drugged prior to the murder
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a toxicology report revealed the victim had been drugged prior to the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a toxicology report revealed the victim had been drugged prior to the murder, thus the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a toxicology report revealed the victim had been drugged prior to the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A toxicology report revealed the victim had been drugged prior to the murder
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a toxicology report revealed the victim had been drugged prior to the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a toxicology report revealed the victim had been drugged prior to the murder, so it can be concluded that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a toxicology report revealed the victim had been drugged prior to the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A toxicology report revealed the victim had been drugged prior to the murder
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a toxicology report revealed the victim had been drugged prior to the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a toxicology report revealed the victim had been drugged prior to the murder, so the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a toxicology report revealed the victim had been drugged prior to the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A toxicology report revealed the victim had been drugged prior to the murder
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a toxicology report revealed the victim had been drugged prior to the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a toxicology report revealed the victim had been drugged prior to the murder, which implies that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a toxicology report revealed the victim had been drugged prior to the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A toxicology report revealed the victim had been drugged prior to the murder
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a toxicology report revealed the victim had been drugged prior to the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a toxicology report revealed the victim had been drugged prior to the murder, which shows that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a toxicology report revealed the victim had been drugged prior to the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A toxicology report revealed the victim had been drugged prior to the murder
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a toxicology report revealed the victim had been drugged prior to the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a toxicology report revealed the victim had been drugged prior to the murder, which establishes that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a toxicology report revealed the victim had been drugged prior to the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A toxicology report revealed the victim had been drugged prior to the murder
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, since if a toxicology report revealed the victim had been drugged prior to the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and a toxicology report revealed the victim had been drugged prior to the murder.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a toxicology report revealed the victim had been drugged prior to the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A toxicology report revealed the victim had been drugged prior to the murder
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, because if a toxicology report revealed the victim had been drugged prior to the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and a toxicology report revealed the victim had been drugged prior to the murder.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a toxicology report revealed the victim had been drugged prior to the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A toxicology report revealed the victim had been drugged prior to the murder
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, as if a toxicology report revealed the victim had been drugged prior to the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and a toxicology report revealed the victim had been drugged prior to the murder.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a toxicology report revealed the victim had been drugged prior to the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A toxicology report revealed the victim had been drugged prior to the murder
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a toxicology report revealed the victim had been drugged prior to the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, therefore a toxicology report did not reveal the victim had been drugged prior to the murder.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a toxicology report revealed the victim had been drugged prior to the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: A toxicology report did not reveal the victim had been drugged prior to the murder
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a toxicology report revealed the victim had been drugged prior to the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, hence a toxicology report did not reveal the victim had been drugged prior to the murder.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a toxicology report revealed the victim had been drugged prior to the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: A toxicology report did not reveal the victim had been drugged prior to the murder
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a toxicology report revealed the victim had been drugged prior to the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, thus a toxicology report did not reveal the victim had been drugged prior to the murder.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a toxicology report revealed the victim had been drugged prior to the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: A toxicology report did not reveal the victim had been drugged prior to the murder
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a toxicology report revealed the victim had been drugged prior to the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, so it can be concluded that a toxicology report did not reveal the victim had been drugged prior to the murder.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a toxicology report revealed the victim had been drugged prior to the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: A toxicology report did not reveal the victim had been drugged prior to the murder
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a toxicology report revealed the victim had been drugged prior to the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, so a toxicology report did not reveal the victim had been drugged prior to the murder.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a toxicology report revealed the victim had been drugged prior to the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: A toxicology report did not reveal the victim had been drugged prior to the murder
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a toxicology report revealed the victim had been drugged prior to the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which implies that a toxicology report did not reveal the victim had been drugged prior to the murder.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a toxicology report revealed the victim had been drugged prior to the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: A toxicology report did not reveal the victim had been drugged prior to the murder
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a toxicology report revealed the victim had been drugged prior to the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which shows that a toxicology report did not reveal the victim had been drugged prior to the murder.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a toxicology report revealed the victim had been drugged prior to the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: A toxicology report did not reveal the victim had been drugged prior to the murder
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a toxicology report revealed the victim had been drugged prior to the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which establishes that a toxicology report did not reveal the victim had been drugged prior to the murder.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a toxicology report revealed the victim had been drugged prior to the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: A toxicology report did not reveal the victim had been drugged prior to the murder
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```A toxicology report did not reveal the victim had been drugged prior to the murder, since if a toxicology report revealed the victim had been drugged prior to the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a toxicology report revealed the victim had been drugged prior to the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: A toxicology report did not reveal the victim had been drugged prior to the murder
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```A toxicology report did not reveal the victim had been drugged prior to the murder, because if a toxicology report revealed the victim had been drugged prior to the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a toxicology report revealed the victim had been drugged prior to the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: A toxicology report did not reveal the victim had been drugged prior to the murder
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```A toxicology report did not reveal the victim had been drugged prior to the murder, as if a toxicology report revealed the victim had been drugged prior to the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a toxicology report revealed the victim had been drugged prior to the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: A toxicology report did not reveal the victim had been drugged prior to the murder
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the suspect had recently purchased a one-way plane ticket to a foreign country then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the suspect had recently purchased a one-way plane ticket to a foreign country, therefore the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect had recently purchased a one-way plane ticket to a foreign country then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The suspect had recently purchased a one-way plane ticket to a foreign country
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the suspect had recently purchased a one-way plane ticket to a foreign country then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the suspect had recently purchased a one-way plane ticket to a foreign country, hence the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect had recently purchased a one-way plane ticket to a foreign country then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The suspect had recently purchased a one-way plane ticket to a foreign country
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the suspect had recently purchased a one-way plane ticket to a foreign country then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the suspect had recently purchased a one-way plane ticket to a foreign country, thus the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect had recently purchased a one-way plane ticket to a foreign country then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The suspect had recently purchased a one-way plane ticket to a foreign country
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the suspect had recently purchased a one-way plane ticket to a foreign country then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the suspect had recently purchased a one-way plane ticket to a foreign country, so it can be concluded that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect had recently purchased a one-way plane ticket to a foreign country then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The suspect had recently purchased a one-way plane ticket to a foreign country
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the suspect had recently purchased a one-way plane ticket to a foreign country then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the suspect had recently purchased a one-way plane ticket to a foreign country, so the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect had recently purchased a one-way plane ticket to a foreign country then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The suspect had recently purchased a one-way plane ticket to a foreign country
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the suspect had recently purchased a one-way plane ticket to a foreign country then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the suspect had recently purchased a one-way plane ticket to a foreign country, which implies that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect had recently purchased a one-way plane ticket to a foreign country then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The suspect had recently purchased a one-way plane ticket to a foreign country
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the suspect had recently purchased a one-way plane ticket to a foreign country then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the suspect had recently purchased a one-way plane ticket to a foreign country, which shows that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect had recently purchased a one-way plane ticket to a foreign country then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The suspect had recently purchased a one-way plane ticket to a foreign country
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the suspect had recently purchased a one-way plane ticket to a foreign country then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the suspect had recently purchased a one-way plane ticket to a foreign country, which establishes that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect had recently purchased a one-way plane ticket to a foreign country then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The suspect had recently purchased a one-way plane ticket to a foreign country
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, since if the suspect had recently purchased a one-way plane ticket to a foreign country then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the suspect had recently purchased a one-way plane ticket to a foreign country.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect had recently purchased a one-way plane ticket to a foreign country then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The suspect had recently purchased a one-way plane ticket to a foreign country
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, because if the suspect had recently purchased a one-way plane ticket to a foreign country then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the suspect had recently purchased a one-way plane ticket to a foreign country.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect had recently purchased a one-way plane ticket to a foreign country then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The suspect had recently purchased a one-way plane ticket to a foreign country
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, as if the suspect had recently purchased a one-way plane ticket to a foreign country then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the suspect had recently purchased a one-way plane ticket to a foreign country.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect had recently purchased a one-way plane ticket to a foreign country then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The suspect had recently purchased a one-way plane ticket to a foreign country
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the suspect had recently purchased a one-way plane ticket to a foreign country then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, therefore the suspect had not recently purchased a one-way plane ticket to a foreign country.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect had recently purchased a one-way plane ticket to a foreign country then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The suspect had not recently purchased a one-way plane ticket to a foreign country
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the suspect had recently purchased a one-way plane ticket to a foreign country then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, hence the suspect had not recently purchased a one-way plane ticket to a foreign country.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect had recently purchased a one-way plane ticket to a foreign country then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The suspect had not recently purchased a one-way plane ticket to a foreign country
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the suspect had recently purchased a one-way plane ticket to a foreign country then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, thus the suspect had not recently purchased a one-way plane ticket to a foreign country.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect had recently purchased a one-way plane ticket to a foreign country then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The suspect had not recently purchased a one-way plane ticket to a foreign country
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the suspect had recently purchased a one-way plane ticket to a foreign country then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, so it can be concluded that the suspect had not recently purchased a one-way plane ticket to a foreign country.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect had recently purchased a one-way plane ticket to a foreign country then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The suspect had not recently purchased a one-way plane ticket to a foreign country
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the suspect had recently purchased a one-way plane ticket to a foreign country then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, so the suspect had not recently purchased a one-way plane ticket to a foreign country.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect had recently purchased a one-way plane ticket to a foreign country then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The suspect had not recently purchased a one-way plane ticket to a foreign country
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the suspect had recently purchased a one-way plane ticket to a foreign country then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which implies that the suspect had not recently purchased a one-way plane ticket to a foreign country.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect had recently purchased a one-way plane ticket to a foreign country then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The suspect had not recently purchased a one-way plane ticket to a foreign country
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the suspect had recently purchased a one-way plane ticket to a foreign country then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which shows that the suspect had not recently purchased a one-way plane ticket to a foreign country.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect had recently purchased a one-way plane ticket to a foreign country then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The suspect had not recently purchased a one-way plane ticket to a foreign country
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the suspect had recently purchased a one-way plane ticket to a foreign country then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which establishes that the suspect had not recently purchased a one-way plane ticket to a foreign country.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect had recently purchased a one-way plane ticket to a foreign country then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The suspect had not recently purchased a one-way plane ticket to a foreign country
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The suspect had not recently purchased a one-way plane ticket to a foreign country, since if the suspect had recently purchased a one-way plane ticket to a foreign country then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect had recently purchased a one-way plane ticket to a foreign country then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The suspect had not recently purchased a one-way plane ticket to a foreign country
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The suspect had not recently purchased a one-way plane ticket to a foreign country, because if the suspect had recently purchased a one-way plane ticket to a foreign country then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect had recently purchased a one-way plane ticket to a foreign country then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The suspect had not recently purchased a one-way plane ticket to a foreign country
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The suspect had not recently purchased a one-way plane ticket to a foreign country, as if the suspect had recently purchased a one-way plane ticket to a foreign country then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect had recently purchased a one-way plane ticket to a foreign country then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The suspect had not recently purchased a one-way plane ticket to a foreign country
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim's jewelry box was empty, suggesting a robbery motive then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the victim's jewelry box was empty, suggesting a robbery motive, therefore the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's jewelry box was empty, suggesting a robbery motive then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The victim's jewelry box was empty, suggesting a robbery motive
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim's jewelry box was empty, suggesting a robbery motive then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the victim's jewelry box was empty, suggesting a robbery motive, hence the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's jewelry box was empty, suggesting a robbery motive then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The victim's jewelry box was empty, suggesting a robbery motive
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim's jewelry box was empty, suggesting a robbery motive then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the victim's jewelry box was empty, suggesting a robbery motive, thus the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's jewelry box was empty, suggesting a robbery motive then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The victim's jewelry box was empty, suggesting a robbery motive
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim's jewelry box was empty, suggesting a robbery motive then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the victim's jewelry box was empty, suggesting a robbery motive, so it can be concluded that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's jewelry box was empty, suggesting a robbery motive then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The victim's jewelry box was empty, suggesting a robbery motive
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim's jewelry box was empty, suggesting a robbery motive then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the victim's jewelry box was empty, suggesting a robbery motive, so the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's jewelry box was empty, suggesting a robbery motive then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The victim's jewelry box was empty, suggesting a robbery motive
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim's jewelry box was empty, suggesting a robbery motive then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the victim's jewelry box was empty, suggesting a robbery motive, which implies that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's jewelry box was empty, suggesting a robbery motive then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The victim's jewelry box was empty, suggesting a robbery motive
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim's jewelry box was empty, suggesting a robbery motive then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the victim's jewelry box was empty, suggesting a robbery motive, which shows that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's jewelry box was empty, suggesting a robbery motive then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The victim's jewelry box was empty, suggesting a robbery motive
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim's jewelry box was empty, suggesting a robbery motive then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the victim's jewelry box was empty, suggesting a robbery motive, which establishes that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's jewelry box was empty, suggesting a robbery motive then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The victim's jewelry box was empty, suggesting a robbery motive
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, since if the victim's jewelry box was empty, suggesting a robbery motive then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the victim's jewelry box was empty, suggesting a robbery motive.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's jewelry box was empty, suggesting a robbery motive then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The victim's jewelry box was empty, suggesting a robbery motive
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, because if the victim's jewelry box was empty, suggesting a robbery motive then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the victim's jewelry box was empty, suggesting a robbery motive.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's jewelry box was empty, suggesting a robbery motive then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The victim's jewelry box was empty, suggesting a robbery motive
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, as if the victim's jewelry box was empty, suggesting a robbery motive then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the victim's jewelry box was empty, suggesting a robbery motive.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's jewelry box was empty, suggesting a robbery motive then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The victim's jewelry box was empty, suggesting a robbery motive
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim's jewelry box was empty, suggesting a robbery motive then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, therefore the victim's jewelry box was not empty, suggesting a robbery motive.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's jewelry box was empty, suggesting a robbery motive then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The victim's jewelry box was not empty, suggesting a robbery motive
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim's jewelry box was empty, suggesting a robbery motive then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, hence the victim's jewelry box was not empty, suggesting a robbery motive.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's jewelry box was empty, suggesting a robbery motive then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The victim's jewelry box was not empty, suggesting a robbery motive
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim's jewelry box was empty, suggesting a robbery motive then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, thus the victim's jewelry box was not empty, suggesting a robbery motive.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's jewelry box was empty, suggesting a robbery motive then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The victim's jewelry box was not empty, suggesting a robbery motive
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim's jewelry box was empty, suggesting a robbery motive then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, so it can be concluded that the victim's jewelry box was not empty, suggesting a robbery motive.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's jewelry box was empty, suggesting a robbery motive then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The victim's jewelry box was not empty, suggesting a robbery motive
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim's jewelry box was empty, suggesting a robbery motive then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, so the victim's jewelry box was not empty, suggesting a robbery motive.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's jewelry box was empty, suggesting a robbery motive then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The victim's jewelry box was not empty, suggesting a robbery motive
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim's jewelry box was empty, suggesting a robbery motive then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which implies that the victim's jewelry box was not empty, suggesting a robbery motive.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's jewelry box was empty, suggesting a robbery motive then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The victim's jewelry box was not empty, suggesting a robbery motive
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim's jewelry box was empty, suggesting a robbery motive then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which shows that the victim's jewelry box was not empty, suggesting a robbery motive.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's jewelry box was empty, suggesting a robbery motive then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The victim's jewelry box was not empty, suggesting a robbery motive
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim's jewelry box was empty, suggesting a robbery motive then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which establishes that the victim's jewelry box was not empty, suggesting a robbery motive.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's jewelry box was empty, suggesting a robbery motive then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The victim's jewelry box was not empty, suggesting a robbery motive
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The victim's jewelry box was not empty, suggesting a robbery motive, since if the victim's jewelry box was empty, suggesting a robbery motive then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's jewelry box was empty, suggesting a robbery motive then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The victim's jewelry box was not empty, suggesting a robbery motive
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The victim's jewelry box was not empty, suggesting a robbery motive, because if the victim's jewelry box was empty, suggesting a robbery motive then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's jewelry box was empty, suggesting a robbery motive then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The victim's jewelry box was not empty, suggesting a robbery motive
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The victim's jewelry box was not empty, suggesting a robbery motive, as if the victim's jewelry box was empty, suggesting a robbery motive then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's jewelry box was empty, suggesting a robbery motive then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The victim's jewelry box was not empty, suggesting a robbery motive
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the suspect had a prior conviction for a similar crime then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the suspect had a prior conviction for a similar crime, therefore the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect had a prior conviction for a similar crime then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The suspect had a prior conviction for a similar crime
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the suspect had a prior conviction for a similar crime then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the suspect had a prior conviction for a similar crime, hence the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect had a prior conviction for a similar crime then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The suspect had a prior conviction for a similar crime
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the suspect had a prior conviction for a similar crime then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the suspect had a prior conviction for a similar crime, thus the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect had a prior conviction for a similar crime then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The suspect had a prior conviction for a similar crime
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the suspect had a prior conviction for a similar crime then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the suspect had a prior conviction for a similar crime, so it can be concluded that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect had a prior conviction for a similar crime then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The suspect had a prior conviction for a similar crime
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the suspect had a prior conviction for a similar crime then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the suspect had a prior conviction for a similar crime, so the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect had a prior conviction for a similar crime then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The suspect had a prior conviction for a similar crime
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the suspect had a prior conviction for a similar crime then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the suspect had a prior conviction for a similar crime, which implies that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect had a prior conviction for a similar crime then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The suspect had a prior conviction for a similar crime
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the suspect had a prior conviction for a similar crime then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the suspect had a prior conviction for a similar crime, which shows that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect had a prior conviction for a similar crime then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The suspect had a prior conviction for a similar crime
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the suspect had a prior conviction for a similar crime then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the suspect had a prior conviction for a similar crime, which establishes that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect had a prior conviction for a similar crime then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The suspect had a prior conviction for a similar crime
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, since if the suspect had a prior conviction for a similar crime then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the suspect had a prior conviction for a similar crime.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect had a prior conviction for a similar crime then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The suspect had a prior conviction for a similar crime
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.