<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street, and officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene, therefore the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
stringlengths 355
1.02k
|
|---|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim's bank account showed unusual activity on the day of the crime then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which shows that the victim's bank account did not show unusual activity on the day of the crime.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's bank account showed unusual activity on the day of the crime then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The victim's bank account did not show unusual activity on the day of the crime
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim's bank account showed unusual activity on the day of the crime then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which establishes that the victim's bank account did not show unusual activity on the day of the crime.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's bank account showed unusual activity on the day of the crime then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The victim's bank account did not show unusual activity on the day of the crime
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The victim's bank account did not show unusual activity on the day of the crime, since if the victim's bank account showed unusual activity on the day of the crime then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's bank account showed unusual activity on the day of the crime then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The victim's bank account did not show unusual activity on the day of the crime
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The victim's bank account did not show unusual activity on the day of the crime, because if the victim's bank account showed unusual activity on the day of the crime then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's bank account showed unusual activity on the day of the crime then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The victim's bank account did not show unusual activity on the day of the crime
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The victim's bank account did not show unusual activity on the day of the crime, as if the victim's bank account showed unusual activity on the day of the crime then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's bank account showed unusual activity on the day of the crime then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The victim's bank account did not show unusual activity on the day of the crime
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If fingerprints belonging to an unknown individual were found on the victim's laptop then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and fingerprints belonging to an unknown individual were found on the victim's laptop, therefore the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If fingerprints belonging to an unknown individual were found on the victim's laptop then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Fingerprints belonging to an unknown individual were found on the victim's laptop
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If fingerprints belonging to an unknown individual were found on the victim's laptop then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and fingerprints belonging to an unknown individual were found on the victim's laptop, hence the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If fingerprints belonging to an unknown individual were found on the victim's laptop then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Fingerprints belonging to an unknown individual were found on the victim's laptop
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If fingerprints belonging to an unknown individual were found on the victim's laptop then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and fingerprints belonging to an unknown individual were found on the victim's laptop, thus the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If fingerprints belonging to an unknown individual were found on the victim's laptop then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Fingerprints belonging to an unknown individual were found on the victim's laptop
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If fingerprints belonging to an unknown individual were found on the victim's laptop then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and fingerprints belonging to an unknown individual were found on the victim's laptop, so it can be concluded that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If fingerprints belonging to an unknown individual were found on the victim's laptop then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Fingerprints belonging to an unknown individual were found on the victim's laptop
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If fingerprints belonging to an unknown individual were found on the victim's laptop then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and fingerprints belonging to an unknown individual were found on the victim's laptop, so the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If fingerprints belonging to an unknown individual were found on the victim's laptop then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Fingerprints belonging to an unknown individual were found on the victim's laptop
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If fingerprints belonging to an unknown individual were found on the victim's laptop then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and fingerprints belonging to an unknown individual were found on the victim's laptop, which implies that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If fingerprints belonging to an unknown individual were found on the victim's laptop then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Fingerprints belonging to an unknown individual were found on the victim's laptop
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If fingerprints belonging to an unknown individual were found on the victim's laptop then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and fingerprints belonging to an unknown individual were found on the victim's laptop, which shows that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If fingerprints belonging to an unknown individual were found on the victim's laptop then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Fingerprints belonging to an unknown individual were found on the victim's laptop
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If fingerprints belonging to an unknown individual were found on the victim's laptop then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and fingerprints belonging to an unknown individual were found on the victim's laptop, which establishes that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If fingerprints belonging to an unknown individual were found on the victim's laptop then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Fingerprints belonging to an unknown individual were found on the victim's laptop
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, since if fingerprints belonging to an unknown individual were found on the victim's laptop then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and fingerprints belonging to an unknown individual were found on the victim's laptop.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If fingerprints belonging to an unknown individual were found on the victim's laptop then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Fingerprints belonging to an unknown individual were found on the victim's laptop
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, because if fingerprints belonging to an unknown individual were found on the victim's laptop then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and fingerprints belonging to an unknown individual were found on the victim's laptop.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If fingerprints belonging to an unknown individual were found on the victim's laptop then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Fingerprints belonging to an unknown individual were found on the victim's laptop
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, as if fingerprints belonging to an unknown individual were found on the victim's laptop then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and fingerprints belonging to an unknown individual were found on the victim's laptop.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If fingerprints belonging to an unknown individual were found on the victim's laptop then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Fingerprints belonging to an unknown individual were found on the victim's laptop
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If fingerprints belonging to an unknown individual were found on the victim's laptop then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, therefore no fingerprints belonging to an unknown individual were found on the victim's laptop.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If fingerprints belonging to an unknown individual were found on the victim's laptop then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: No fingerprints belonging to an unknown individual were found on the victim's laptop
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If fingerprints belonging to an unknown individual were found on the victim's laptop then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, hence no fingerprints belonging to an unknown individual were found on the victim's laptop.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If fingerprints belonging to an unknown individual were found on the victim's laptop then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: No fingerprints belonging to an unknown individual were found on the victim's laptop
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If fingerprints belonging to an unknown individual were found on the victim's laptop then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, thus no fingerprints belonging to an unknown individual were found on the victim's laptop.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If fingerprints belonging to an unknown individual were found on the victim's laptop then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: No fingerprints belonging to an unknown individual were found on the victim's laptop
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If fingerprints belonging to an unknown individual were found on the victim's laptop then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, so it can be concluded that no fingerprints belonging to an unknown individual were found on the victim's laptop.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If fingerprints belonging to an unknown individual were found on the victim's laptop then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: No fingerprints belonging to an unknown individual were found on the victim's laptop
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If fingerprints belonging to an unknown individual were found on the victim's laptop then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, so no fingerprints belonging to an unknown individual were found on the victim's laptop.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If fingerprints belonging to an unknown individual were found on the victim's laptop then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: No fingerprints belonging to an unknown individual were found on the victim's laptop
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If fingerprints belonging to an unknown individual were found on the victim's laptop then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which implies that no fingerprints belonging to an unknown individual were found on the victim's laptop.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If fingerprints belonging to an unknown individual were found on the victim's laptop then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: No fingerprints belonging to an unknown individual were found on the victim's laptop
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If fingerprints belonging to an unknown individual were found on the victim's laptop then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which shows that no fingerprints belonging to an unknown individual were found on the victim's laptop.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If fingerprints belonging to an unknown individual were found on the victim's laptop then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: No fingerprints belonging to an unknown individual were found on the victim's laptop
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If fingerprints belonging to an unknown individual were found on the victim's laptop then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which establishes that no fingerprints belonging to an unknown individual were found on the victim's laptop.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If fingerprints belonging to an unknown individual were found on the victim's laptop then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: No fingerprints belonging to an unknown individual were found on the victim's laptop
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```No fingerprints belonging to an unknown individual were found on the victim's laptop, since if fingerprints belonging to an unknown individual were found on the victim's laptop then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If fingerprints belonging to an unknown individual were found on the victim's laptop then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: No fingerprints belonging to an unknown individual were found on the victim's laptop
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```No fingerprints belonging to an unknown individual were found on the victim's laptop, because if fingerprints belonging to an unknown individual were found on the victim's laptop then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If fingerprints belonging to an unknown individual were found on the victim's laptop then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: No fingerprints belonging to an unknown individual were found on the victim's laptop
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```No fingerprints belonging to an unknown individual were found on the victim's laptop, as if fingerprints belonging to an unknown individual were found on the victim's laptop then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If fingerprints belonging to an unknown individual were found on the victim's laptop then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: No fingerprints belonging to an unknown individual were found on the victim's laptop
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the suspect had a history of violence against the victim then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the suspect had a history of violence against the victim, therefore the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect had a history of violence against the victim then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The suspect had a history of violence against the victim
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the suspect had a history of violence against the victim then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the suspect had a history of violence against the victim, hence the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect had a history of violence against the victim then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The suspect had a history of violence against the victim
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the suspect had a history of violence against the victim then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the suspect had a history of violence against the victim, thus the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect had a history of violence against the victim then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The suspect had a history of violence against the victim
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the suspect had a history of violence against the victim then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the suspect had a history of violence against the victim, so it can be concluded that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect had a history of violence against the victim then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The suspect had a history of violence against the victim
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the suspect had a history of violence against the victim then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the suspect had a history of violence against the victim, so the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect had a history of violence against the victim then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The suspect had a history of violence against the victim
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the suspect had a history of violence against the victim then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the suspect had a history of violence against the victim, which implies that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect had a history of violence against the victim then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The suspect had a history of violence against the victim
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the suspect had a history of violence against the victim then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the suspect had a history of violence against the victim, which shows that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect had a history of violence against the victim then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The suspect had a history of violence against the victim
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the suspect had a history of violence against the victim then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the suspect had a history of violence against the victim, which establishes that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect had a history of violence against the victim then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The suspect had a history of violence against the victim
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, since if the suspect had a history of violence against the victim then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the suspect had a history of violence against the victim.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect had a history of violence against the victim then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The suspect had a history of violence against the victim
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, because if the suspect had a history of violence against the victim then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the suspect had a history of violence against the victim.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect had a history of violence against the victim then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The suspect had a history of violence against the victim
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, as if the suspect had a history of violence against the victim then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the suspect had a history of violence against the victim.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect had a history of violence against the victim then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The suspect had a history of violence against the victim
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the suspect had a history of violence against the victim then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, therefore the suspect did not have a history of violence against the victim.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect had a history of violence against the victim then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The suspect did not have a history of violence against the victim
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the suspect had a history of violence against the victim then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, hence the suspect did not have a history of violence against the victim.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect had a history of violence against the victim then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The suspect did not have a history of violence against the victim
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the suspect had a history of violence against the victim then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, thus the suspect did not have a history of violence against the victim.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect had a history of violence against the victim then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The suspect did not have a history of violence against the victim
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the suspect had a history of violence against the victim then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, so it can be concluded that the suspect did not have a history of violence against the victim.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect had a history of violence against the victim then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The suspect did not have a history of violence against the victim
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the suspect had a history of violence against the victim then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, so the suspect did not have a history of violence against the victim.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect had a history of violence against the victim then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The suspect did not have a history of violence against the victim
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the suspect had a history of violence against the victim then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which implies that the suspect did not have a history of violence against the victim.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect had a history of violence against the victim then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The suspect did not have a history of violence against the victim
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the suspect had a history of violence against the victim then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which shows that the suspect did not have a history of violence against the victim.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect had a history of violence against the victim then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The suspect did not have a history of violence against the victim
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the suspect had a history of violence against the victim then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which establishes that the suspect did not have a history of violence against the victim.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect had a history of violence against the victim then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The suspect did not have a history of violence against the victim
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The suspect did not have a history of violence against the victim, since if the suspect had a history of violence against the victim then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect had a history of violence against the victim then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The suspect did not have a history of violence against the victim
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The suspect did not have a history of violence against the victim, because if the suspect had a history of violence against the victim then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect had a history of violence against the victim then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The suspect did not have a history of violence against the victim
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The suspect did not have a history of violence against the victim, as if the suspect had a history of violence against the victim then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect had a history of violence against the victim then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The suspect did not have a history of violence against the victim
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a handwritten letter containing threats was discovered in the suspect's home then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a handwritten letter containing threats was discovered in the suspect's home, therefore the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a handwritten letter containing threats was discovered in the suspect's home then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A handwritten letter containing threats was discovered in the suspect's home
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a handwritten letter containing threats was discovered in the suspect's home then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a handwritten letter containing threats was discovered in the suspect's home, hence the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a handwritten letter containing threats was discovered in the suspect's home then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A handwritten letter containing threats was discovered in the suspect's home
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a handwritten letter containing threats was discovered in the suspect's home then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a handwritten letter containing threats was discovered in the suspect's home, thus the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a handwritten letter containing threats was discovered in the suspect's home then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A handwritten letter containing threats was discovered in the suspect's home
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a handwritten letter containing threats was discovered in the suspect's home then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a handwritten letter containing threats was discovered in the suspect's home, so it can be concluded that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a handwritten letter containing threats was discovered in the suspect's home then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A handwritten letter containing threats was discovered in the suspect's home
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a handwritten letter containing threats was discovered in the suspect's home then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a handwritten letter containing threats was discovered in the suspect's home, so the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a handwritten letter containing threats was discovered in the suspect's home then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A handwritten letter containing threats was discovered in the suspect's home
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a handwritten letter containing threats was discovered in the suspect's home then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a handwritten letter containing threats was discovered in the suspect's home, which implies that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a handwritten letter containing threats was discovered in the suspect's home then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A handwritten letter containing threats was discovered in the suspect's home
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a handwritten letter containing threats was discovered in the suspect's home then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a handwritten letter containing threats was discovered in the suspect's home, which shows that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a handwritten letter containing threats was discovered in the suspect's home then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A handwritten letter containing threats was discovered in the suspect's home
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a handwritten letter containing threats was discovered in the suspect's home then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a handwritten letter containing threats was discovered in the suspect's home, which establishes that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a handwritten letter containing threats was discovered in the suspect's home then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A handwritten letter containing threats was discovered in the suspect's home
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, since if a handwritten letter containing threats was discovered in the suspect's home then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and a handwritten letter containing threats was discovered in the suspect's home.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a handwritten letter containing threats was discovered in the suspect's home then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A handwritten letter containing threats was discovered in the suspect's home
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, because if a handwritten letter containing threats was discovered in the suspect's home then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and a handwritten letter containing threats was discovered in the suspect's home.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a handwritten letter containing threats was discovered in the suspect's home then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A handwritten letter containing threats was discovered in the suspect's home
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, as if a handwritten letter containing threats was discovered in the suspect's home then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and a handwritten letter containing threats was discovered in the suspect's home.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a handwritten letter containing threats was discovered in the suspect's home then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A handwritten letter containing threats was discovered in the suspect's home
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a handwritten letter containing threats was discovered in the suspect's home then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, therefore no handwritten letter containing threats was discovered in the suspect's home.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a handwritten letter containing threats was discovered in the suspect's home then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: No handwritten letter containing threats was discovered in the suspect's home
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a handwritten letter containing threats was discovered in the suspect's home then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, hence no handwritten letter containing threats was discovered in the suspect's home.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a handwritten letter containing threats was discovered in the suspect's home then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: No handwritten letter containing threats was discovered in the suspect's home
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a handwritten letter containing threats was discovered in the suspect's home then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, thus no handwritten letter containing threats was discovered in the suspect's home.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a handwritten letter containing threats was discovered in the suspect's home then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: No handwritten letter containing threats was discovered in the suspect's home
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a handwritten letter containing threats was discovered in the suspect's home then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, so it can be concluded that no handwritten letter containing threats was discovered in the suspect's home.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a handwritten letter containing threats was discovered in the suspect's home then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: No handwritten letter containing threats was discovered in the suspect's home
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a handwritten letter containing threats was discovered in the suspect's home then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, so no handwritten letter containing threats was discovered in the suspect's home.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a handwritten letter containing threats was discovered in the suspect's home then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: No handwritten letter containing threats was discovered in the suspect's home
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a handwritten letter containing threats was discovered in the suspect's home then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which implies that no handwritten letter containing threats was discovered in the suspect's home.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a handwritten letter containing threats was discovered in the suspect's home then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: No handwritten letter containing threats was discovered in the suspect's home
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a handwritten letter containing threats was discovered in the suspect's home then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which shows that no handwritten letter containing threats was discovered in the suspect's home.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a handwritten letter containing threats was discovered in the suspect's home then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: No handwritten letter containing threats was discovered in the suspect's home
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a handwritten letter containing threats was discovered in the suspect's home then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which establishes that no handwritten letter containing threats was discovered in the suspect's home.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a handwritten letter containing threats was discovered in the suspect's home then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: No handwritten letter containing threats was discovered in the suspect's home
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```No handwritten letter containing threats was discovered in the suspect's home, since if a handwritten letter containing threats was discovered in the suspect's home then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a handwritten letter containing threats was discovered in the suspect's home then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: No handwritten letter containing threats was discovered in the suspect's home
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```No handwritten letter containing threats was discovered in the suspect's home, because if a handwritten letter containing threats was discovered in the suspect's home then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a handwritten letter containing threats was discovered in the suspect's home then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: No handwritten letter containing threats was discovered in the suspect's home
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```No handwritten letter containing threats was discovered in the suspect's home, as if a handwritten letter containing threats was discovered in the suspect's home then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a handwritten letter containing threats was discovered in the suspect's home then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: No handwritten letter containing threats was discovered in the suspect's home
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a neighbor reported hearing a heated argument coming from the victim's apartment then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a neighbor reported hearing a heated argument coming from the victim's apartment, therefore the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a neighbor reported hearing a heated argument coming from the victim's apartment then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A neighbor reported hearing a heated argument coming from the victim's apartment
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a neighbor reported hearing a heated argument coming from the victim's apartment then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a neighbor reported hearing a heated argument coming from the victim's apartment, hence the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a neighbor reported hearing a heated argument coming from the victim's apartment then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A neighbor reported hearing a heated argument coming from the victim's apartment
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a neighbor reported hearing a heated argument coming from the victim's apartment then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a neighbor reported hearing a heated argument coming from the victim's apartment, thus the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a neighbor reported hearing a heated argument coming from the victim's apartment then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A neighbor reported hearing a heated argument coming from the victim's apartment
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a neighbor reported hearing a heated argument coming from the victim's apartment then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a neighbor reported hearing a heated argument coming from the victim's apartment, so it can be concluded that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a neighbor reported hearing a heated argument coming from the victim's apartment then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A neighbor reported hearing a heated argument coming from the victim's apartment
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a neighbor reported hearing a heated argument coming from the victim's apartment then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a neighbor reported hearing a heated argument coming from the victim's apartment, so the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a neighbor reported hearing a heated argument coming from the victim's apartment then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A neighbor reported hearing a heated argument coming from the victim's apartment
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a neighbor reported hearing a heated argument coming from the victim's apartment then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a neighbor reported hearing a heated argument coming from the victim's apartment, which implies that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a neighbor reported hearing a heated argument coming from the victim's apartment then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A neighbor reported hearing a heated argument coming from the victim's apartment
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a neighbor reported hearing a heated argument coming from the victim's apartment then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a neighbor reported hearing a heated argument coming from the victim's apartment, which shows that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a neighbor reported hearing a heated argument coming from the victim's apartment then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A neighbor reported hearing a heated argument coming from the victim's apartment
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a neighbor reported hearing a heated argument coming from the victim's apartment then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a neighbor reported hearing a heated argument coming from the victim's apartment, which establishes that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a neighbor reported hearing a heated argument coming from the victim's apartment then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A neighbor reported hearing a heated argument coming from the victim's apartment
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, since if a neighbor reported hearing a heated argument coming from the victim's apartment then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and a neighbor reported hearing a heated argument coming from the victim's apartment.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a neighbor reported hearing a heated argument coming from the victim's apartment then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A neighbor reported hearing a heated argument coming from the victim's apartment
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, because if a neighbor reported hearing a heated argument coming from the victim's apartment then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and a neighbor reported hearing a heated argument coming from the victim's apartment.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a neighbor reported hearing a heated argument coming from the victim's apartment then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A neighbor reported hearing a heated argument coming from the victim's apartment
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, as if a neighbor reported hearing a heated argument coming from the victim's apartment then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and a neighbor reported hearing a heated argument coming from the victim's apartment.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a neighbor reported hearing a heated argument coming from the victim's apartment then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A neighbor reported hearing a heated argument coming from the victim's apartment
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a neighbor reported hearing a heated argument coming from the victim's apartment then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, therefore no neighbor reported hearing a heated argument coming from the victim's apartment.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a neighbor reported hearing a heated argument coming from the victim's apartment then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: No neighbor reported hearing a heated argument coming from the victim's apartment
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a neighbor reported hearing a heated argument coming from the victim's apartment then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, hence no neighbor reported hearing a heated argument coming from the victim's apartment.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a neighbor reported hearing a heated argument coming from the victim's apartment then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: No neighbor reported hearing a heated argument coming from the victim's apartment
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a neighbor reported hearing a heated argument coming from the victim's apartment then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, thus no neighbor reported hearing a heated argument coming from the victim's apartment.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a neighbor reported hearing a heated argument coming from the victim's apartment then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: No neighbor reported hearing a heated argument coming from the victim's apartment
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a neighbor reported hearing a heated argument coming from the victim's apartment then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, so it can be concluded that no neighbor reported hearing a heated argument coming from the victim's apartment.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a neighbor reported hearing a heated argument coming from the victim's apartment then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: No neighbor reported hearing a heated argument coming from the victim's apartment
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a neighbor reported hearing a heated argument coming from the victim's apartment then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, so no neighbor reported hearing a heated argument coming from the victim's apartment.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a neighbor reported hearing a heated argument coming from the victim's apartment then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: No neighbor reported hearing a heated argument coming from the victim's apartment
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a neighbor reported hearing a heated argument coming from the victim's apartment then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which implies that no neighbor reported hearing a heated argument coming from the victim's apartment.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a neighbor reported hearing a heated argument coming from the victim's apartment then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: No neighbor reported hearing a heated argument coming from the victim's apartment
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a neighbor reported hearing a heated argument coming from the victim's apartment then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which shows that no neighbor reported hearing a heated argument coming from the victim's apartment.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a neighbor reported hearing a heated argument coming from the victim's apartment then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: No neighbor reported hearing a heated argument coming from the victim's apartment
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a neighbor reported hearing a heated argument coming from the victim's apartment then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which establishes that no neighbor reported hearing a heated argument coming from the victim's apartment.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a neighbor reported hearing a heated argument coming from the victim's apartment then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: No neighbor reported hearing a heated argument coming from the victim's apartment
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```No neighbor reported hearing a heated argument coming from the victim's apartment, since if a neighbor reported hearing a heated argument coming from the victim's apartment then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a neighbor reported hearing a heated argument coming from the victim's apartment then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: No neighbor reported hearing a heated argument coming from the victim's apartment
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```No neighbor reported hearing a heated argument coming from the victim's apartment, because if a neighbor reported hearing a heated argument coming from the victim's apartment then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a neighbor reported hearing a heated argument coming from the victim's apartment then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: No neighbor reported hearing a heated argument coming from the victim's apartment
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```No neighbor reported hearing a heated argument coming from the victim's apartment, as if a neighbor reported hearing a heated argument coming from the victim's apartment then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a neighbor reported hearing a heated argument coming from the victim's apartment then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: No neighbor reported hearing a heated argument coming from the victim's apartment
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the suspect's alibi was corroborated by several witnesses then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the suspect's alibi was corroborated by several witnesses, therefore the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect's alibi was corroborated by several witnesses then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The suspect's alibi was corroborated by several witnesses
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the suspect's alibi was corroborated by several witnesses then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the suspect's alibi was corroborated by several witnesses, hence the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect's alibi was corroborated by several witnesses then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The suspect's alibi was corroborated by several witnesses
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the suspect's alibi was corroborated by several witnesses then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the suspect's alibi was corroborated by several witnesses, thus the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect's alibi was corroborated by several witnesses then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The suspect's alibi was corroborated by several witnesses
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the suspect's alibi was corroborated by several witnesses then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the suspect's alibi was corroborated by several witnesses, so it can be concluded that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect's alibi was corroborated by several witnesses then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The suspect's alibi was corroborated by several witnesses
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the suspect's alibi was corroborated by several witnesses then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the suspect's alibi was corroborated by several witnesses, so the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect's alibi was corroborated by several witnesses then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The suspect's alibi was corroborated by several witnesses
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the suspect's alibi was corroborated by several witnesses then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the suspect's alibi was corroborated by several witnesses, which implies that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect's alibi was corroborated by several witnesses then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The suspect's alibi was corroborated by several witnesses
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the suspect's alibi was corroborated by several witnesses then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the suspect's alibi was corroborated by several witnesses, which shows that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect's alibi was corroborated by several witnesses then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The suspect's alibi was corroborated by several witnesses
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.