<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street, and officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene, therefore the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
stringlengths 355
1.02k
|
|---|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's neighbors reported seeing strange symbols painted on her door then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, so laura's neighbors did not report seeing strange symbols painted on her door.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's neighbors reported seeing strange symbols painted on her door then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Laura's neighbors did not report seeing strange symbols painted on her door
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's neighbors reported seeing strange symbols painted on her door then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which implies that laura's neighbors did not report seeing strange symbols painted on her door.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's neighbors reported seeing strange symbols painted on her door then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Laura's neighbors did not report seeing strange symbols painted on her door
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's neighbors reported seeing strange symbols painted on her door then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which shows that laura's neighbors did not report seeing strange symbols painted on her door.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's neighbors reported seeing strange symbols painted on her door then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Laura's neighbors did not report seeing strange symbols painted on her door
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's neighbors reported seeing strange symbols painted on her door then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which establishes that laura's neighbors did not report seeing strange symbols painted on her door.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's neighbors reported seeing strange symbols painted on her door then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Laura's neighbors did not report seeing strange symbols painted on her door
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```Laura's neighbors did not report seeing strange symbols painted on her door, since if laura's neighbors reported seeing strange symbols painted on her door then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's neighbors reported seeing strange symbols painted on her door then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Laura's neighbors did not report seeing strange symbols painted on her door
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```Laura's neighbors did not report seeing strange symbols painted on her door, because if laura's neighbors reported seeing strange symbols painted on her door then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's neighbors reported seeing strange symbols painted on her door then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Laura's neighbors did not report seeing strange symbols painted on her door
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```Laura's neighbors did not report seeing strange symbols painted on her door, as if laura's neighbors reported seeing strange symbols painted on her door then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's neighbors reported seeing strange symbols painted on her door then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Laura's neighbors did not report seeing strange symbols painted on her door
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a suspicious package was left on laura's doorstep then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a suspicious package was left on laura's doorstep, therefore the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a suspicious package was left on laura's doorstep then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A suspicious package was left on laura's doorstep
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a suspicious package was left on laura's doorstep then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a suspicious package was left on laura's doorstep, hence the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a suspicious package was left on laura's doorstep then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A suspicious package was left on laura's doorstep
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a suspicious package was left on laura's doorstep then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a suspicious package was left on laura's doorstep, thus the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a suspicious package was left on laura's doorstep then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A suspicious package was left on laura's doorstep
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a suspicious package was left on laura's doorstep then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a suspicious package was left on laura's doorstep, so it can be concluded that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a suspicious package was left on laura's doorstep then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A suspicious package was left on laura's doorstep
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a suspicious package was left on laura's doorstep then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a suspicious package was left on laura's doorstep, so the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a suspicious package was left on laura's doorstep then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A suspicious package was left on laura's doorstep
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a suspicious package was left on laura's doorstep then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a suspicious package was left on laura's doorstep, which implies that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a suspicious package was left on laura's doorstep then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A suspicious package was left on laura's doorstep
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a suspicious package was left on laura's doorstep then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a suspicious package was left on laura's doorstep, which shows that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a suspicious package was left on laura's doorstep then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A suspicious package was left on laura's doorstep
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a suspicious package was left on laura's doorstep then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a suspicious package was left on laura's doorstep, which establishes that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a suspicious package was left on laura's doorstep then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A suspicious package was left on laura's doorstep
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, since if a suspicious package was left on laura's doorstep then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and a suspicious package was left on laura's doorstep.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a suspicious package was left on laura's doorstep then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A suspicious package was left on laura's doorstep
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, because if a suspicious package was left on laura's doorstep then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and a suspicious package was left on laura's doorstep.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a suspicious package was left on laura's doorstep then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A suspicious package was left on laura's doorstep
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, as if a suspicious package was left on laura's doorstep then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and a suspicious package was left on laura's doorstep.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a suspicious package was left on laura's doorstep then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A suspicious package was left on laura's doorstep
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a suspicious package was left on laura's doorstep then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, therefore no suspicious package was left on laura's doorstep.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a suspicious package was left on laura's doorstep then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: No suspicious package was left on Laura's doorstep
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a suspicious package was left on laura's doorstep then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, hence no suspicious package was left on laura's doorstep.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a suspicious package was left on laura's doorstep then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: No suspicious package was left on Laura's doorstep
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a suspicious package was left on laura's doorstep then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, thus no suspicious package was left on laura's doorstep.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a suspicious package was left on laura's doorstep then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: No suspicious package was left on Laura's doorstep
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a suspicious package was left on laura's doorstep then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, so it can be concluded that no suspicious package was left on laura's doorstep.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a suspicious package was left on laura's doorstep then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: No suspicious package was left on Laura's doorstep
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a suspicious package was left on laura's doorstep then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, so no suspicious package was left on laura's doorstep.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a suspicious package was left on laura's doorstep then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: No suspicious package was left on Laura's doorstep
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a suspicious package was left on laura's doorstep then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which implies that no suspicious package was left on laura's doorstep.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a suspicious package was left on laura's doorstep then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: No suspicious package was left on Laura's doorstep
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a suspicious package was left on laura's doorstep then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which shows that no suspicious package was left on laura's doorstep.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a suspicious package was left on laura's doorstep then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: No suspicious package was left on Laura's doorstep
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a suspicious package was left on laura's doorstep then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which establishes that no suspicious package was left on laura's doorstep.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a suspicious package was left on laura's doorstep then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: No suspicious package was left on Laura's doorstep
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```No suspicious package was left on laura's doorstep, since if a suspicious package was left on laura's doorstep then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a suspicious package was left on laura's doorstep then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: No suspicious package was left on Laura's doorstep
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```No suspicious package was left on laura's doorstep, because if a suspicious package was left on laura's doorstep then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a suspicious package was left on laura's doorstep then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: No suspicious package was left on Laura's doorstep
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```No suspicious package was left on laura's doorstep, as if a suspicious package was left on laura's doorstep then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a suspicious package was left on laura's doorstep then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: No suspicious package was left on Laura's doorstep
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If john davis had a history of violating restraining orders then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and john davis had a history of violating restraining orders, therefore the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had a history of violating restraining orders then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: John davis had a history of violating restraining orders
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If john davis had a history of violating restraining orders then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and john davis had a history of violating restraining orders, hence the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had a history of violating restraining orders then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: John davis had a history of violating restraining orders
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If john davis had a history of violating restraining orders then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and john davis had a history of violating restraining orders, thus the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had a history of violating restraining orders then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: John davis had a history of violating restraining orders
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If john davis had a history of violating restraining orders then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and john davis had a history of violating restraining orders, so it can be concluded that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had a history of violating restraining orders then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: John davis had a history of violating restraining orders
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If john davis had a history of violating restraining orders then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and john davis had a history of violating restraining orders, so the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had a history of violating restraining orders then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: John davis had a history of violating restraining orders
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If john davis had a history of violating restraining orders then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and john davis had a history of violating restraining orders, which implies that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had a history of violating restraining orders then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: John davis had a history of violating restraining orders
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If john davis had a history of violating restraining orders then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and john davis had a history of violating restraining orders, which shows that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had a history of violating restraining orders then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: John davis had a history of violating restraining orders
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If john davis had a history of violating restraining orders then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and john davis had a history of violating restraining orders, which establishes that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had a history of violating restraining orders then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: John davis had a history of violating restraining orders
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, since if john davis had a history of violating restraining orders then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and john davis had a history of violating restraining orders.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had a history of violating restraining orders then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: John davis had a history of violating restraining orders
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, because if john davis had a history of violating restraining orders then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and john davis had a history of violating restraining orders.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had a history of violating restraining orders then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: John davis had a history of violating restraining orders
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, as if john davis had a history of violating restraining orders then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and john davis had a history of violating restraining orders.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had a history of violating restraining orders then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: John davis had a history of violating restraining orders
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If john davis had a history of violating restraining orders then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, therefore john davis did not have a history of violating restraining orders.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had a history of violating restraining orders then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: John Davis did not have a history of violating restraining orders
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If john davis had a history of violating restraining orders then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, hence john davis did not have a history of violating restraining orders.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had a history of violating restraining orders then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: John Davis did not have a history of violating restraining orders
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If john davis had a history of violating restraining orders then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, thus john davis did not have a history of violating restraining orders.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had a history of violating restraining orders then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: John Davis did not have a history of violating restraining orders
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If john davis had a history of violating restraining orders then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, so it can be concluded that john davis did not have a history of violating restraining orders.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had a history of violating restraining orders then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: John Davis did not have a history of violating restraining orders
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If john davis had a history of violating restraining orders then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, so john davis did not have a history of violating restraining orders.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had a history of violating restraining orders then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: John Davis did not have a history of violating restraining orders
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If john davis had a history of violating restraining orders then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which implies that john davis did not have a history of violating restraining orders.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had a history of violating restraining orders then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: John Davis did not have a history of violating restraining orders
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If john davis had a history of violating restraining orders then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which shows that john davis did not have a history of violating restraining orders.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had a history of violating restraining orders then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: John Davis did not have a history of violating restraining orders
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If john davis had a history of violating restraining orders then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which establishes that john davis did not have a history of violating restraining orders.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had a history of violating restraining orders then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: John Davis did not have a history of violating restraining orders
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```John davis did not have a history of violating restraining orders, since if john davis had a history of violating restraining orders then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had a history of violating restraining orders then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: John Davis did not have a history of violating restraining orders
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```John davis did not have a history of violating restraining orders, because if john davis had a history of violating restraining orders then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had a history of violating restraining orders then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: John Davis did not have a history of violating restraining orders
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```John davis did not have a history of violating restraining orders, as if john davis had a history of violating restraining orders then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had a history of violating restraining orders then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: John Davis did not have a history of violating restraining orders
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the stolen car was discovered abandoned in a remote forest then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the stolen car was discovered abandoned in a remote forest, therefore the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the stolen car was discovered abandoned in a remote forest then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The stolen car was discovered abandoned in a remote forest
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the stolen car was discovered abandoned in a remote forest then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the stolen car was discovered abandoned in a remote forest, hence the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the stolen car was discovered abandoned in a remote forest then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The stolen car was discovered abandoned in a remote forest
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the stolen car was discovered abandoned in a remote forest then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the stolen car was discovered abandoned in a remote forest, thus the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the stolen car was discovered abandoned in a remote forest then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The stolen car was discovered abandoned in a remote forest
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the stolen car was discovered abandoned in a remote forest then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the stolen car was discovered abandoned in a remote forest, so it can be concluded that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the stolen car was discovered abandoned in a remote forest then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The stolen car was discovered abandoned in a remote forest
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the stolen car was discovered abandoned in a remote forest then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the stolen car was discovered abandoned in a remote forest, so the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the stolen car was discovered abandoned in a remote forest then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The stolen car was discovered abandoned in a remote forest
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the stolen car was discovered abandoned in a remote forest then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the stolen car was discovered abandoned in a remote forest, which implies that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the stolen car was discovered abandoned in a remote forest then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The stolen car was discovered abandoned in a remote forest
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the stolen car was discovered abandoned in a remote forest then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the stolen car was discovered abandoned in a remote forest, which shows that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the stolen car was discovered abandoned in a remote forest then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The stolen car was discovered abandoned in a remote forest
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the stolen car was discovered abandoned in a remote forest then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the stolen car was discovered abandoned in a remote forest, which establishes that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the stolen car was discovered abandoned in a remote forest then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The stolen car was discovered abandoned in a remote forest
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, since if the stolen car was discovered abandoned in a remote forest then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the stolen car was discovered abandoned in a remote forest.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the stolen car was discovered abandoned in a remote forest then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The stolen car was discovered abandoned in a remote forest
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, because if the stolen car was discovered abandoned in a remote forest then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the stolen car was discovered abandoned in a remote forest.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the stolen car was discovered abandoned in a remote forest then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The stolen car was discovered abandoned in a remote forest
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, as if the stolen car was discovered abandoned in a remote forest then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the stolen car was discovered abandoned in a remote forest.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the stolen car was discovered abandoned in a remote forest then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The stolen car was discovered abandoned in a remote forest
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the stolen car was discovered abandoned in a remote forest then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, therefore the stolen car was not discovered abandoned in a remote forest.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the stolen car was discovered abandoned in a remote forest then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The stolen car was not discovered abandoned in a remote forest
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the stolen car was discovered abandoned in a remote forest then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, hence the stolen car was not discovered abandoned in a remote forest.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the stolen car was discovered abandoned in a remote forest then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The stolen car was not discovered abandoned in a remote forest
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the stolen car was discovered abandoned in a remote forest then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, thus the stolen car was not discovered abandoned in a remote forest.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the stolen car was discovered abandoned in a remote forest then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The stolen car was not discovered abandoned in a remote forest
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the stolen car was discovered abandoned in a remote forest then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, so it can be concluded that the stolen car was not discovered abandoned in a remote forest.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the stolen car was discovered abandoned in a remote forest then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The stolen car was not discovered abandoned in a remote forest
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the stolen car was discovered abandoned in a remote forest then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, so the stolen car was not discovered abandoned in a remote forest.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the stolen car was discovered abandoned in a remote forest then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The stolen car was not discovered abandoned in a remote forest
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the stolen car was discovered abandoned in a remote forest then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which implies that the stolen car was not discovered abandoned in a remote forest.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the stolen car was discovered abandoned in a remote forest then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The stolen car was not discovered abandoned in a remote forest
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the stolen car was discovered abandoned in a remote forest then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which shows that the stolen car was not discovered abandoned in a remote forest.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the stolen car was discovered abandoned in a remote forest then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The stolen car was not discovered abandoned in a remote forest
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the stolen car was discovered abandoned in a remote forest then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which establishes that the stolen car was not discovered abandoned in a remote forest.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the stolen car was discovered abandoned in a remote forest then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The stolen car was not discovered abandoned in a remote forest
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The stolen car was not discovered abandoned in a remote forest, since if the stolen car was discovered abandoned in a remote forest then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the stolen car was discovered abandoned in a remote forest then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The stolen car was not discovered abandoned in a remote forest
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The stolen car was not discovered abandoned in a remote forest, because if the stolen car was discovered abandoned in a remote forest then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the stolen car was discovered abandoned in a remote forest then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The stolen car was not discovered abandoned in a remote forest
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The stolen car was not discovered abandoned in a remote forest, as if the stolen car was discovered abandoned in a remote forest then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the stolen car was discovered abandoned in a remote forest then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The stolen car was not discovered abandoned in a remote forest
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a witness reported seeing a suspicious figure near the crime scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a witness reported seeing a suspicious figure near the crime scene, therefore the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a witness reported seeing a suspicious figure near the crime scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A witness reported seeing a suspicious figure near the crime scene
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a witness reported seeing a suspicious figure near the crime scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a witness reported seeing a suspicious figure near the crime scene, hence the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a witness reported seeing a suspicious figure near the crime scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A witness reported seeing a suspicious figure near the crime scene
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a witness reported seeing a suspicious figure near the crime scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a witness reported seeing a suspicious figure near the crime scene, thus the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a witness reported seeing a suspicious figure near the crime scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A witness reported seeing a suspicious figure near the crime scene
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a witness reported seeing a suspicious figure near the crime scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a witness reported seeing a suspicious figure near the crime scene, so it can be concluded that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a witness reported seeing a suspicious figure near the crime scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A witness reported seeing a suspicious figure near the crime scene
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a witness reported seeing a suspicious figure near the crime scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a witness reported seeing a suspicious figure near the crime scene, so the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a witness reported seeing a suspicious figure near the crime scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A witness reported seeing a suspicious figure near the crime scene
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a witness reported seeing a suspicious figure near the crime scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a witness reported seeing a suspicious figure near the crime scene, which implies that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a witness reported seeing a suspicious figure near the crime scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A witness reported seeing a suspicious figure near the crime scene
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a witness reported seeing a suspicious figure near the crime scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a witness reported seeing a suspicious figure near the crime scene, which shows that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a witness reported seeing a suspicious figure near the crime scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A witness reported seeing a suspicious figure near the crime scene
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a witness reported seeing a suspicious figure near the crime scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a witness reported seeing a suspicious figure near the crime scene, which establishes that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a witness reported seeing a suspicious figure near the crime scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A witness reported seeing a suspicious figure near the crime scene
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, since if a witness reported seeing a suspicious figure near the crime scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and a witness reported seeing a suspicious figure near the crime scene.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a witness reported seeing a suspicious figure near the crime scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A witness reported seeing a suspicious figure near the crime scene
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, because if a witness reported seeing a suspicious figure near the crime scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and a witness reported seeing a suspicious figure near the crime scene.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a witness reported seeing a suspicious figure near the crime scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A witness reported seeing a suspicious figure near the crime scene
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, as if a witness reported seeing a suspicious figure near the crime scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and a witness reported seeing a suspicious figure near the crime scene.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a witness reported seeing a suspicious figure near the crime scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A witness reported seeing a suspicious figure near the crime scene
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a witness reported seeing a suspicious figure near the crime scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, therefore no witness reported seeing a suspicious figure near the crime scene.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a witness reported seeing a suspicious figure near the crime scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: No witness reported seeing a suspicious figure near the crime scene
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a witness reported seeing a suspicious figure near the crime scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, hence no witness reported seeing a suspicious figure near the crime scene.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a witness reported seeing a suspicious figure near the crime scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: No witness reported seeing a suspicious figure near the crime scene
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a witness reported seeing a suspicious figure near the crime scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, thus no witness reported seeing a suspicious figure near the crime scene.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a witness reported seeing a suspicious figure near the crime scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: No witness reported seeing a suspicious figure near the crime scene
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a witness reported seeing a suspicious figure near the crime scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, so it can be concluded that no witness reported seeing a suspicious figure near the crime scene.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a witness reported seeing a suspicious figure near the crime scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: No witness reported seeing a suspicious figure near the crime scene
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a witness reported seeing a suspicious figure near the crime scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, so no witness reported seeing a suspicious figure near the crime scene.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a witness reported seeing a suspicious figure near the crime scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: No witness reported seeing a suspicious figure near the crime scene
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a witness reported seeing a suspicious figure near the crime scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which implies that no witness reported seeing a suspicious figure near the crime scene.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a witness reported seeing a suspicious figure near the crime scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: No witness reported seeing a suspicious figure near the crime scene
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a witness reported seeing a suspicious figure near the crime scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which shows that no witness reported seeing a suspicious figure near the crime scene.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a witness reported seeing a suspicious figure near the crime scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: No witness reported seeing a suspicious figure near the crime scene
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a witness reported seeing a suspicious figure near the crime scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which establishes that no witness reported seeing a suspicious figure near the crime scene.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a witness reported seeing a suspicious figure near the crime scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: No witness reported seeing a suspicious figure near the crime scene
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```No witness reported seeing a suspicious figure near the crime scene, since if a witness reported seeing a suspicious figure near the crime scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a witness reported seeing a suspicious figure near the crime scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: No witness reported seeing a suspicious figure near the crime scene
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```No witness reported seeing a suspicious figure near the crime scene, because if a witness reported seeing a suspicious figure near the crime scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a witness reported seeing a suspicious figure near the crime scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: No witness reported seeing a suspicious figure near the crime scene
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```No witness reported seeing a suspicious figure near the crime scene, as if a witness reported seeing a suspicious figure near the crime scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a witness reported seeing a suspicious figure near the crime scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: No witness reported seeing a suspicious figure near the crime scene
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim's cellphone was found in a nearby dumpster then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the victim's cellphone was found in a nearby dumpster, therefore the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's cellphone was found in a nearby dumpster then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The victim's cellphone was found in a nearby dumpster
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim's cellphone was found in a nearby dumpster then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the victim's cellphone was found in a nearby dumpster, hence the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's cellphone was found in a nearby dumpster then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The victim's cellphone was found in a nearby dumpster
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim's cellphone was found in a nearby dumpster then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the victim's cellphone was found in a nearby dumpster, thus the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's cellphone was found in a nearby dumpster then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The victim's cellphone was found in a nearby dumpster
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim's cellphone was found in a nearby dumpster then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the victim's cellphone was found in a nearby dumpster, so it can be concluded that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's cellphone was found in a nearby dumpster then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The victim's cellphone was found in a nearby dumpster
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim's cellphone was found in a nearby dumpster then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the victim's cellphone was found in a nearby dumpster, so the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's cellphone was found in a nearby dumpster then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The victim's cellphone was found in a nearby dumpster
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.