<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street, and officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene, therefore the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
stringlengths 355
1.02k
|
|---|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a neighbor reported smelling gasoline near laura's house then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, thus no neighbor reported smelling gasoline near laura's house.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a neighbor reported smelling gasoline near laura's house then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: No neighbor reported smelling gasoline near Laura's house
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a neighbor reported smelling gasoline near laura's house then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, so it can be concluded that no neighbor reported smelling gasoline near laura's house.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a neighbor reported smelling gasoline near laura's house then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: No neighbor reported smelling gasoline near Laura's house
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a neighbor reported smelling gasoline near laura's house then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, so no neighbor reported smelling gasoline near laura's house.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a neighbor reported smelling gasoline near laura's house then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: No neighbor reported smelling gasoline near Laura's house
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a neighbor reported smelling gasoline near laura's house then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which implies that no neighbor reported smelling gasoline near laura's house.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a neighbor reported smelling gasoline near laura's house then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: No neighbor reported smelling gasoline near Laura's house
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a neighbor reported smelling gasoline near laura's house then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which shows that no neighbor reported smelling gasoline near laura's house.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a neighbor reported smelling gasoline near laura's house then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: No neighbor reported smelling gasoline near Laura's house
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a neighbor reported smelling gasoline near laura's house then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which establishes that no neighbor reported smelling gasoline near laura's house.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a neighbor reported smelling gasoline near laura's house then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: No neighbor reported smelling gasoline near Laura's house
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```No neighbor reported smelling gasoline near laura's house, since if a neighbor reported smelling gasoline near laura's house then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a neighbor reported smelling gasoline near laura's house then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: No neighbor reported smelling gasoline near Laura's house
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```No neighbor reported smelling gasoline near laura's house, because if a neighbor reported smelling gasoline near laura's house then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a neighbor reported smelling gasoline near laura's house then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: No neighbor reported smelling gasoline near Laura's house
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```No neighbor reported smelling gasoline near laura's house, as if a neighbor reported smelling gasoline near laura's house then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a neighbor reported smelling gasoline near laura's house then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: No neighbor reported smelling gasoline near Laura's house
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If john davis had a cache of illegal firearms then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and john davis had a cache of illegal firearms, therefore the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had a cache of illegal firearms then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: John davis had a cache of illegal firearms
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If john davis had a cache of illegal firearms then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and john davis had a cache of illegal firearms, hence the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had a cache of illegal firearms then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: John davis had a cache of illegal firearms
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If john davis had a cache of illegal firearms then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and john davis had a cache of illegal firearms, thus the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had a cache of illegal firearms then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: John davis had a cache of illegal firearms
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If john davis had a cache of illegal firearms then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and john davis had a cache of illegal firearms, so it can be concluded that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had a cache of illegal firearms then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: John davis had a cache of illegal firearms
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If john davis had a cache of illegal firearms then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and john davis had a cache of illegal firearms, so the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had a cache of illegal firearms then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: John davis had a cache of illegal firearms
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If john davis had a cache of illegal firearms then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and john davis had a cache of illegal firearms, which implies that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had a cache of illegal firearms then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: John davis had a cache of illegal firearms
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If john davis had a cache of illegal firearms then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and john davis had a cache of illegal firearms, which shows that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had a cache of illegal firearms then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: John davis had a cache of illegal firearms
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If john davis had a cache of illegal firearms then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and john davis had a cache of illegal firearms, which establishes that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had a cache of illegal firearms then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: John davis had a cache of illegal firearms
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, since if john davis had a cache of illegal firearms then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and john davis had a cache of illegal firearms.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had a cache of illegal firearms then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: John davis had a cache of illegal firearms
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, because if john davis had a cache of illegal firearms then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and john davis had a cache of illegal firearms.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had a cache of illegal firearms then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: John davis had a cache of illegal firearms
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, as if john davis had a cache of illegal firearms then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and john davis had a cache of illegal firearms.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had a cache of illegal firearms then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: John davis had a cache of illegal firearms
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If john davis had a cache of illegal firearms then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, therefore john davis did not have a cache of illegal firearms.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had a cache of illegal firearms then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: John Davis did not have a cache of illegal firearms
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If john davis had a cache of illegal firearms then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, hence john davis did not have a cache of illegal firearms.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had a cache of illegal firearms then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: John Davis did not have a cache of illegal firearms
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If john davis had a cache of illegal firearms then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, thus john davis did not have a cache of illegal firearms.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had a cache of illegal firearms then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: John Davis did not have a cache of illegal firearms
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If john davis had a cache of illegal firearms then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, so it can be concluded that john davis did not have a cache of illegal firearms.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had a cache of illegal firearms then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: John Davis did not have a cache of illegal firearms
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If john davis had a cache of illegal firearms then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, so john davis did not have a cache of illegal firearms.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had a cache of illegal firearms then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: John Davis did not have a cache of illegal firearms
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If john davis had a cache of illegal firearms then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which implies that john davis did not have a cache of illegal firearms.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had a cache of illegal firearms then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: John Davis did not have a cache of illegal firearms
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If john davis had a cache of illegal firearms then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which shows that john davis did not have a cache of illegal firearms.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had a cache of illegal firearms then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: John Davis did not have a cache of illegal firearms
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If john davis had a cache of illegal firearms then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which establishes that john davis did not have a cache of illegal firearms.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had a cache of illegal firearms then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: John Davis did not have a cache of illegal firearms
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```John davis did not have a cache of illegal firearms, since if john davis had a cache of illegal firearms then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had a cache of illegal firearms then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: John Davis did not have a cache of illegal firearms
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```John davis did not have a cache of illegal firearms, because if john davis had a cache of illegal firearms then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had a cache of illegal firearms then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: John Davis did not have a cache of illegal firearms
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```John davis did not have a cache of illegal firearms, as if john davis had a cache of illegal firearms then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had a cache of illegal firearms then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: John Davis did not have a cache of illegal firearms
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's medical records were accessed without authorization then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and laura's medical records were accessed without authorization, therefore the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's medical records were accessed without authorization then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Laura's medical records were accessed without authorization
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's medical records were accessed without authorization then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and laura's medical records were accessed without authorization, hence the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's medical records were accessed without authorization then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Laura's medical records were accessed without authorization
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's medical records were accessed without authorization then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and laura's medical records were accessed without authorization, thus the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's medical records were accessed without authorization then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Laura's medical records were accessed without authorization
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's medical records were accessed without authorization then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and laura's medical records were accessed without authorization, so it can be concluded that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's medical records were accessed without authorization then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Laura's medical records were accessed without authorization
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's medical records were accessed without authorization then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and laura's medical records were accessed without authorization, so the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's medical records were accessed without authorization then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Laura's medical records were accessed without authorization
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's medical records were accessed without authorization then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and laura's medical records were accessed without authorization, which implies that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's medical records were accessed without authorization then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Laura's medical records were accessed without authorization
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's medical records were accessed without authorization then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and laura's medical records were accessed without authorization, which shows that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's medical records were accessed without authorization then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Laura's medical records were accessed without authorization
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's medical records were accessed without authorization then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and laura's medical records were accessed without authorization, which establishes that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's medical records were accessed without authorization then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Laura's medical records were accessed without authorization
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, since if laura's medical records were accessed without authorization then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and laura's medical records were accessed without authorization.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's medical records were accessed without authorization then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Laura's medical records were accessed without authorization
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, because if laura's medical records were accessed without authorization then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and laura's medical records were accessed without authorization.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's medical records were accessed without authorization then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Laura's medical records were accessed without authorization
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, as if laura's medical records were accessed without authorization then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and laura's medical records were accessed without authorization.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's medical records were accessed without authorization then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Laura's medical records were accessed without authorization
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's medical records were accessed without authorization then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, therefore laura's medical records were not accessed without authorization.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's medical records were accessed without authorization then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Laura's medical records were not accessed without authorization
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's medical records were accessed without authorization then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, hence laura's medical records were not accessed without authorization.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's medical records were accessed without authorization then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Laura's medical records were not accessed without authorization
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's medical records were accessed without authorization then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, thus laura's medical records were not accessed without authorization.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's medical records were accessed without authorization then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Laura's medical records were not accessed without authorization
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's medical records were accessed without authorization then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, so it can be concluded that laura's medical records were not accessed without authorization.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's medical records were accessed without authorization then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Laura's medical records were not accessed without authorization
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's medical records were accessed without authorization then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, so laura's medical records were not accessed without authorization.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's medical records were accessed without authorization then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Laura's medical records were not accessed without authorization
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's medical records were accessed without authorization then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which implies that laura's medical records were not accessed without authorization.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's medical records were accessed without authorization then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Laura's medical records were not accessed without authorization
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's medical records were accessed without authorization then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which shows that laura's medical records were not accessed without authorization.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's medical records were accessed without authorization then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Laura's medical records were not accessed without authorization
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's medical records were accessed without authorization then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which establishes that laura's medical records were not accessed without authorization.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's medical records were accessed without authorization then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Laura's medical records were not accessed without authorization
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```Laura's medical records were not accessed without authorization, since if laura's medical records were accessed without authorization then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's medical records were accessed without authorization then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Laura's medical records were not accessed without authorization
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```Laura's medical records were not accessed without authorization, because if laura's medical records were accessed without authorization then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's medical records were accessed without authorization then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Laura's medical records were not accessed without authorization
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```Laura's medical records were not accessed without authorization, as if laura's medical records were accessed without authorization then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's medical records were accessed without authorization then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Laura's medical records were not accessed without authorization
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a threatening message was written on laura's bathroom mirror then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a threatening message was written on laura's bathroom mirror, therefore the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a threatening message was written on laura's bathroom mirror then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A threatening message was written on laura's bathroom mirror
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a threatening message was written on laura's bathroom mirror then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a threatening message was written on laura's bathroom mirror, hence the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a threatening message was written on laura's bathroom mirror then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A threatening message was written on laura's bathroom mirror
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a threatening message was written on laura's bathroom mirror then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a threatening message was written on laura's bathroom mirror, thus the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a threatening message was written on laura's bathroom mirror then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A threatening message was written on laura's bathroom mirror
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a threatening message was written on laura's bathroom mirror then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a threatening message was written on laura's bathroom mirror, so it can be concluded that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a threatening message was written on laura's bathroom mirror then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A threatening message was written on laura's bathroom mirror
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a threatening message was written on laura's bathroom mirror then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a threatening message was written on laura's bathroom mirror, so the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a threatening message was written on laura's bathroom mirror then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A threatening message was written on laura's bathroom mirror
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a threatening message was written on laura's bathroom mirror then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a threatening message was written on laura's bathroom mirror, which implies that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a threatening message was written on laura's bathroom mirror then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A threatening message was written on laura's bathroom mirror
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a threatening message was written on laura's bathroom mirror then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a threatening message was written on laura's bathroom mirror, which shows that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a threatening message was written on laura's bathroom mirror then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A threatening message was written on laura's bathroom mirror
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a threatening message was written on laura's bathroom mirror then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a threatening message was written on laura's bathroom mirror, which establishes that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a threatening message was written on laura's bathroom mirror then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A threatening message was written on laura's bathroom mirror
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, since if a threatening message was written on laura's bathroom mirror then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and a threatening message was written on laura's bathroom mirror.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a threatening message was written on laura's bathroom mirror then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A threatening message was written on laura's bathroom mirror
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, because if a threatening message was written on laura's bathroom mirror then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and a threatening message was written on laura's bathroom mirror.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a threatening message was written on laura's bathroom mirror then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A threatening message was written on laura's bathroom mirror
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, as if a threatening message was written on laura's bathroom mirror then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and a threatening message was written on laura's bathroom mirror.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a threatening message was written on laura's bathroom mirror then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A threatening message was written on laura's bathroom mirror
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a threatening message was written on laura's bathroom mirror then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, therefore no threatening message was written on laura's bathroom mirror.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a threatening message was written on laura's bathroom mirror then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: No threatening message was written on Laura's bathroom mirror
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a threatening message was written on laura's bathroom mirror then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, hence no threatening message was written on laura's bathroom mirror.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a threatening message was written on laura's bathroom mirror then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: No threatening message was written on Laura's bathroom mirror
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a threatening message was written on laura's bathroom mirror then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, thus no threatening message was written on laura's bathroom mirror.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a threatening message was written on laura's bathroom mirror then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: No threatening message was written on Laura's bathroom mirror
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a threatening message was written on laura's bathroom mirror then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, so it can be concluded that no threatening message was written on laura's bathroom mirror.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a threatening message was written on laura's bathroom mirror then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: No threatening message was written on Laura's bathroom mirror
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a threatening message was written on laura's bathroom mirror then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, so no threatening message was written on laura's bathroom mirror.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a threatening message was written on laura's bathroom mirror then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: No threatening message was written on Laura's bathroom mirror
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a threatening message was written on laura's bathroom mirror then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which implies that no threatening message was written on laura's bathroom mirror.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a threatening message was written on laura's bathroom mirror then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: No threatening message was written on Laura's bathroom mirror
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a threatening message was written on laura's bathroom mirror then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which shows that no threatening message was written on laura's bathroom mirror.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a threatening message was written on laura's bathroom mirror then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: No threatening message was written on Laura's bathroom mirror
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a threatening message was written on laura's bathroom mirror then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which establishes that no threatening message was written on laura's bathroom mirror.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a threatening message was written on laura's bathroom mirror then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: No threatening message was written on Laura's bathroom mirror
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```No threatening message was written on laura's bathroom mirror, since if a threatening message was written on laura's bathroom mirror then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a threatening message was written on laura's bathroom mirror then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: No threatening message was written on Laura's bathroom mirror
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```No threatening message was written on laura's bathroom mirror, because if a threatening message was written on laura's bathroom mirror then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a threatening message was written on laura's bathroom mirror then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: No threatening message was written on Laura's bathroom mirror
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```No threatening message was written on laura's bathroom mirror, as if a threatening message was written on laura's bathroom mirror then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a threatening message was written on laura's bathroom mirror then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: No threatening message was written on Laura's bathroom mirror
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If john davis was in possession of a lock-picking kit then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and john davis was in possession of a lock-picking kit, therefore the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis was in possession of a lock-picking kit then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: John davis was in possession of a lock-picking kit
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If john davis was in possession of a lock-picking kit then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and john davis was in possession of a lock-picking kit, hence the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis was in possession of a lock-picking kit then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: John davis was in possession of a lock-picking kit
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If john davis was in possession of a lock-picking kit then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and john davis was in possession of a lock-picking kit, thus the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis was in possession of a lock-picking kit then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: John davis was in possession of a lock-picking kit
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If john davis was in possession of a lock-picking kit then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and john davis was in possession of a lock-picking kit, so it can be concluded that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis was in possession of a lock-picking kit then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: John davis was in possession of a lock-picking kit
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If john davis was in possession of a lock-picking kit then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and john davis was in possession of a lock-picking kit, so the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis was in possession of a lock-picking kit then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: John davis was in possession of a lock-picking kit
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If john davis was in possession of a lock-picking kit then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and john davis was in possession of a lock-picking kit, which implies that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis was in possession of a lock-picking kit then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: John davis was in possession of a lock-picking kit
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If john davis was in possession of a lock-picking kit then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and john davis was in possession of a lock-picking kit, which shows that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis was in possession of a lock-picking kit then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: John davis was in possession of a lock-picking kit
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If john davis was in possession of a lock-picking kit then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and john davis was in possession of a lock-picking kit, which establishes that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis was in possession of a lock-picking kit then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: John davis was in possession of a lock-picking kit
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, since if john davis was in possession of a lock-picking kit then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and john davis was in possession of a lock-picking kit.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis was in possession of a lock-picking kit then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: John davis was in possession of a lock-picking kit
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, because if john davis was in possession of a lock-picking kit then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and john davis was in possession of a lock-picking kit.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis was in possession of a lock-picking kit then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: John davis was in possession of a lock-picking kit
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, as if john davis was in possession of a lock-picking kit then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and john davis was in possession of a lock-picking kit.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis was in possession of a lock-picking kit then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: John davis was in possession of a lock-picking kit
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If john davis was in possession of a lock-picking kit then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, therefore john davis was not in possession of a lock-picking kit.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis was in possession of a lock-picking kit then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: John Davis was not in possession of a lock-picking kit
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If john davis was in possession of a lock-picking kit then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, hence john davis was not in possession of a lock-picking kit.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis was in possession of a lock-picking kit then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: John Davis was not in possession of a lock-picking kit
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If john davis was in possession of a lock-picking kit then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, thus john davis was not in possession of a lock-picking kit.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis was in possession of a lock-picking kit then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: John Davis was not in possession of a lock-picking kit
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If john davis was in possession of a lock-picking kit then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, so it can be concluded that john davis was not in possession of a lock-picking kit.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis was in possession of a lock-picking kit then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: John Davis was not in possession of a lock-picking kit
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If john davis was in possession of a lock-picking kit then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, so john davis was not in possession of a lock-picking kit.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis was in possession of a lock-picking kit then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: John Davis was not in possession of a lock-picking kit
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If john davis was in possession of a lock-picking kit then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which implies that john davis was not in possession of a lock-picking kit.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis was in possession of a lock-picking kit then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: John Davis was not in possession of a lock-picking kit
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If john davis was in possession of a lock-picking kit then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which shows that john davis was not in possession of a lock-picking kit.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis was in possession of a lock-picking kit then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: John Davis was not in possession of a lock-picking kit
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If john davis was in possession of a lock-picking kit then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which establishes that john davis was not in possession of a lock-picking kit.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis was in possession of a lock-picking kit then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: John Davis was not in possession of a lock-picking kit
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```John davis was not in possession of a lock-picking kit, since if john davis was in possession of a lock-picking kit then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis was in possession of a lock-picking kit then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: John Davis was not in possession of a lock-picking kit
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```John davis was not in possession of a lock-picking kit, because if john davis was in possession of a lock-picking kit then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis was in possession of a lock-picking kit then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: John Davis was not in possession of a lock-picking kit
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```John davis was not in possession of a lock-picking kit, as if john davis was in possession of a lock-picking kit then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis was in possession of a lock-picking kit then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: John Davis was not in possession of a lock-picking kit
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's car was found with a slashed tire then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and laura's car was found with a slashed tire, therefore the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's car was found with a slashed tire then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Laura's car was found with a slashed tire
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's car was found with a slashed tire then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and laura's car was found with a slashed tire, hence the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's car was found with a slashed tire then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Laura's car was found with a slashed tire
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's car was found with a slashed tire then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and laura's car was found with a slashed tire, thus the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's car was found with a slashed tire then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Laura's car was found with a slashed tire
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.