<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street, and officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene, therefore the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
stringlengths 355
1.02k
|
|---|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the suspect's alibi was corroborated by several witnesses then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the suspect's alibi was corroborated by several witnesses, which establishes that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect's alibi was corroborated by several witnesses then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The suspect's alibi was corroborated by several witnesses
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, since if the suspect's alibi was corroborated by several witnesses then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the suspect's alibi was corroborated by several witnesses.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect's alibi was corroborated by several witnesses then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The suspect's alibi was corroborated by several witnesses
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, because if the suspect's alibi was corroborated by several witnesses then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the suspect's alibi was corroborated by several witnesses.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect's alibi was corroborated by several witnesses then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The suspect's alibi was corroborated by several witnesses
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, as if the suspect's alibi was corroborated by several witnesses then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the suspect's alibi was corroborated by several witnesses.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect's alibi was corroborated by several witnesses then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The suspect's alibi was corroborated by several witnesses
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the suspect's alibi was corroborated by several witnesses then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, therefore the suspect's alibi was not corroborated by several witnesses.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect's alibi was corroborated by several witnesses then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The suspect's alibi was not corroborated by several witnesses
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the suspect's alibi was corroborated by several witnesses then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, hence the suspect's alibi was not corroborated by several witnesses.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect's alibi was corroborated by several witnesses then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The suspect's alibi was not corroborated by several witnesses
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the suspect's alibi was corroborated by several witnesses then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, thus the suspect's alibi was not corroborated by several witnesses.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect's alibi was corroborated by several witnesses then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The suspect's alibi was not corroborated by several witnesses
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the suspect's alibi was corroborated by several witnesses then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, so it can be concluded that the suspect's alibi was not corroborated by several witnesses.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect's alibi was corroborated by several witnesses then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The suspect's alibi was not corroborated by several witnesses
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the suspect's alibi was corroborated by several witnesses then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, so the suspect's alibi was not corroborated by several witnesses.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect's alibi was corroborated by several witnesses then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The suspect's alibi was not corroborated by several witnesses
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the suspect's alibi was corroborated by several witnesses then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which implies that the suspect's alibi was not corroborated by several witnesses.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect's alibi was corroborated by several witnesses then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The suspect's alibi was not corroborated by several witnesses
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the suspect's alibi was corroborated by several witnesses then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which shows that the suspect's alibi was not corroborated by several witnesses.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect's alibi was corroborated by several witnesses then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The suspect's alibi was not corroborated by several witnesses
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the suspect's alibi was corroborated by several witnesses then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which establishes that the suspect's alibi was not corroborated by several witnesses.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect's alibi was corroborated by several witnesses then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The suspect's alibi was not corroborated by several witnesses
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The suspect's alibi was not corroborated by several witnesses, since if the suspect's alibi was corroborated by several witnesses then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect's alibi was corroborated by several witnesses then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The suspect's alibi was not corroborated by several witnesses
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The suspect's alibi was not corroborated by several witnesses, because if the suspect's alibi was corroborated by several witnesses then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect's alibi was corroborated by several witnesses then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The suspect's alibi was not corroborated by several witnesses
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The suspect's alibi was not corroborated by several witnesses, as if the suspect's alibi was corroborated by several witnesses then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect's alibi was corroborated by several witnesses then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The suspect's alibi was not corroborated by several witnesses
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim's pet dog was found unharmed in the backyard then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the victim's pet dog was found unharmed in the backyard, therefore the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's pet dog was found unharmed in the backyard then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The victim's pet dog was found unharmed in the backyard
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim's pet dog was found unharmed in the backyard then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the victim's pet dog was found unharmed in the backyard, hence the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's pet dog was found unharmed in the backyard then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The victim's pet dog was found unharmed in the backyard
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim's pet dog was found unharmed in the backyard then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the victim's pet dog was found unharmed in the backyard, thus the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's pet dog was found unharmed in the backyard then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The victim's pet dog was found unharmed in the backyard
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim's pet dog was found unharmed in the backyard then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the victim's pet dog was found unharmed in the backyard, so it can be concluded that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's pet dog was found unharmed in the backyard then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The victim's pet dog was found unharmed in the backyard
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim's pet dog was found unharmed in the backyard then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the victim's pet dog was found unharmed in the backyard, so the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's pet dog was found unharmed in the backyard then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The victim's pet dog was found unharmed in the backyard
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim's pet dog was found unharmed in the backyard then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the victim's pet dog was found unharmed in the backyard, which implies that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's pet dog was found unharmed in the backyard then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The victim's pet dog was found unharmed in the backyard
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim's pet dog was found unharmed in the backyard then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the victim's pet dog was found unharmed in the backyard, which shows that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's pet dog was found unharmed in the backyard then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The victim's pet dog was found unharmed in the backyard
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim's pet dog was found unharmed in the backyard then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the victim's pet dog was found unharmed in the backyard, which establishes that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's pet dog was found unharmed in the backyard then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The victim's pet dog was found unharmed in the backyard
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, since if the victim's pet dog was found unharmed in the backyard then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the victim's pet dog was found unharmed in the backyard.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's pet dog was found unharmed in the backyard then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The victim's pet dog was found unharmed in the backyard
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, because if the victim's pet dog was found unharmed in the backyard then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the victim's pet dog was found unharmed in the backyard.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's pet dog was found unharmed in the backyard then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The victim's pet dog was found unharmed in the backyard
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, as if the victim's pet dog was found unharmed in the backyard then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the victim's pet dog was found unharmed in the backyard.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's pet dog was found unharmed in the backyard then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The victim's pet dog was found unharmed in the backyard
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim's pet dog was found unharmed in the backyard then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, therefore the victim's pet dog was not found unharmed in the backyard.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's pet dog was found unharmed in the backyard then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The victim's pet dog was not found unharmed in the backyard
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim's pet dog was found unharmed in the backyard then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, hence the victim's pet dog was not found unharmed in the backyard.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's pet dog was found unharmed in the backyard then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The victim's pet dog was not found unharmed in the backyard
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim's pet dog was found unharmed in the backyard then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, thus the victim's pet dog was not found unharmed in the backyard.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's pet dog was found unharmed in the backyard then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The victim's pet dog was not found unharmed in the backyard
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim's pet dog was found unharmed in the backyard then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, so it can be concluded that the victim's pet dog was not found unharmed in the backyard.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's pet dog was found unharmed in the backyard then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The victim's pet dog was not found unharmed in the backyard
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim's pet dog was found unharmed in the backyard then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, so the victim's pet dog was not found unharmed in the backyard.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's pet dog was found unharmed in the backyard then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The victim's pet dog was not found unharmed in the backyard
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim's pet dog was found unharmed in the backyard then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which implies that the victim's pet dog was not found unharmed in the backyard.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's pet dog was found unharmed in the backyard then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The victim's pet dog was not found unharmed in the backyard
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim's pet dog was found unharmed in the backyard then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which shows that the victim's pet dog was not found unharmed in the backyard.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's pet dog was found unharmed in the backyard then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The victim's pet dog was not found unharmed in the backyard
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim's pet dog was found unharmed in the backyard then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which establishes that the victim's pet dog was not found unharmed in the backyard.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's pet dog was found unharmed in the backyard then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The victim's pet dog was not found unharmed in the backyard
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The victim's pet dog was not found unharmed in the backyard, since if the victim's pet dog was found unharmed in the backyard then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's pet dog was found unharmed in the backyard then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The victim's pet dog was not found unharmed in the backyard
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The victim's pet dog was not found unharmed in the backyard, because if the victim's pet dog was found unharmed in the backyard then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's pet dog was found unharmed in the backyard then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The victim's pet dog was not found unharmed in the backyard
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The victim's pet dog was not found unharmed in the backyard, as if the victim's pet dog was found unharmed in the backyard then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's pet dog was found unharmed in the backyard then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The victim's pet dog was not found unharmed in the backyard
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim had a life insurance policy with the suspect as the beneficiary then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the victim had a life insurance policy with the suspect as the beneficiary, therefore the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim had a life insurance policy with the suspect as the beneficiary then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The victim had a life insurance policy with the suspect as the beneficiary
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim had a life insurance policy with the suspect as the beneficiary then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the victim had a life insurance policy with the suspect as the beneficiary, hence the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim had a life insurance policy with the suspect as the beneficiary then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The victim had a life insurance policy with the suspect as the beneficiary
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim had a life insurance policy with the suspect as the beneficiary then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the victim had a life insurance policy with the suspect as the beneficiary, thus the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim had a life insurance policy with the suspect as the beneficiary then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The victim had a life insurance policy with the suspect as the beneficiary
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim had a life insurance policy with the suspect as the beneficiary then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the victim had a life insurance policy with the suspect as the beneficiary, so it can be concluded that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim had a life insurance policy with the suspect as the beneficiary then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The victim had a life insurance policy with the suspect as the beneficiary
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim had a life insurance policy with the suspect as the beneficiary then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the victim had a life insurance policy with the suspect as the beneficiary, so the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim had a life insurance policy with the suspect as the beneficiary then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The victim had a life insurance policy with the suspect as the beneficiary
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim had a life insurance policy with the suspect as the beneficiary then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the victim had a life insurance policy with the suspect as the beneficiary, which implies that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim had a life insurance policy with the suspect as the beneficiary then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The victim had a life insurance policy with the suspect as the beneficiary
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim had a life insurance policy with the suspect as the beneficiary then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the victim had a life insurance policy with the suspect as the beneficiary, which shows that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim had a life insurance policy with the suspect as the beneficiary then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The victim had a life insurance policy with the suspect as the beneficiary
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim had a life insurance policy with the suspect as the beneficiary then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the victim had a life insurance policy with the suspect as the beneficiary, which establishes that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim had a life insurance policy with the suspect as the beneficiary then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The victim had a life insurance policy with the suspect as the beneficiary
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, since if the victim had a life insurance policy with the suspect as the beneficiary then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the victim had a life insurance policy with the suspect as the beneficiary.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim had a life insurance policy with the suspect as the beneficiary then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The victim had a life insurance policy with the suspect as the beneficiary
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, because if the victim had a life insurance policy with the suspect as the beneficiary then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the victim had a life insurance policy with the suspect as the beneficiary.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim had a life insurance policy with the suspect as the beneficiary then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The victim had a life insurance policy with the suspect as the beneficiary
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, as if the victim had a life insurance policy with the suspect as the beneficiary then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the victim had a life insurance policy with the suspect as the beneficiary.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim had a life insurance policy with the suspect as the beneficiary then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The victim had a life insurance policy with the suspect as the beneficiary
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim had a life insurance policy with the suspect as the beneficiary then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, therefore the victim did not have a life insurance policy with the suspect as the beneficiary.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim had a life insurance policy with the suspect as the beneficiary then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The victim did not have a life insurance policy with the suspect as the beneficiary
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim had a life insurance policy with the suspect as the beneficiary then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, hence the victim did not have a life insurance policy with the suspect as the beneficiary.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim had a life insurance policy with the suspect as the beneficiary then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The victim did not have a life insurance policy with the suspect as the beneficiary
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim had a life insurance policy with the suspect as the beneficiary then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, thus the victim did not have a life insurance policy with the suspect as the beneficiary.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim had a life insurance policy with the suspect as the beneficiary then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The victim did not have a life insurance policy with the suspect as the beneficiary
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim had a life insurance policy with the suspect as the beneficiary then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, so it can be concluded that the victim did not have a life insurance policy with the suspect as the beneficiary.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim had a life insurance policy with the suspect as the beneficiary then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The victim did not have a life insurance policy with the suspect as the beneficiary
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim had a life insurance policy with the suspect as the beneficiary then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, so the victim did not have a life insurance policy with the suspect as the beneficiary.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim had a life insurance policy with the suspect as the beneficiary then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The victim did not have a life insurance policy with the suspect as the beneficiary
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim had a life insurance policy with the suspect as the beneficiary then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which implies that the victim did not have a life insurance policy with the suspect as the beneficiary.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim had a life insurance policy with the suspect as the beneficiary then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The victim did not have a life insurance policy with the suspect as the beneficiary
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim had a life insurance policy with the suspect as the beneficiary then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which shows that the victim did not have a life insurance policy with the suspect as the beneficiary.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim had a life insurance policy with the suspect as the beneficiary then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The victim did not have a life insurance policy with the suspect as the beneficiary
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim had a life insurance policy with the suspect as the beneficiary then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which establishes that the victim did not have a life insurance policy with the suspect as the beneficiary.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim had a life insurance policy with the suspect as the beneficiary then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The victim did not have a life insurance policy with the suspect as the beneficiary
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The victim did not have a life insurance policy with the suspect as the beneficiary, since if the victim had a life insurance policy with the suspect as the beneficiary then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim had a life insurance policy with the suspect as the beneficiary then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The victim did not have a life insurance policy with the suspect as the beneficiary
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The victim did not have a life insurance policy with the suspect as the beneficiary, because if the victim had a life insurance policy with the suspect as the beneficiary then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim had a life insurance policy with the suspect as the beneficiary then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The victim did not have a life insurance policy with the suspect as the beneficiary
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The victim did not have a life insurance policy with the suspect as the beneficiary, as if the victim had a life insurance policy with the suspect as the beneficiary then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim had a life insurance policy with the suspect as the beneficiary then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The victim did not have a life insurance policy with the suspect as the beneficiary
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If surveillance footage showed the suspect purchasing cleaning supplies before the crime then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and surveillance footage showed the suspect purchasing cleaning supplies before the crime, therefore the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If surveillance footage showed the suspect purchasing cleaning supplies before the crime then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Surveillance footage showed the suspect purchasing cleaning supplies before the crime
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If surveillance footage showed the suspect purchasing cleaning supplies before the crime then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and surveillance footage showed the suspect purchasing cleaning supplies before the crime, hence the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If surveillance footage showed the suspect purchasing cleaning supplies before the crime then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Surveillance footage showed the suspect purchasing cleaning supplies before the crime
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If surveillance footage showed the suspect purchasing cleaning supplies before the crime then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and surveillance footage showed the suspect purchasing cleaning supplies before the crime, thus the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If surveillance footage showed the suspect purchasing cleaning supplies before the crime then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Surveillance footage showed the suspect purchasing cleaning supplies before the crime
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If surveillance footage showed the suspect purchasing cleaning supplies before the crime then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and surveillance footage showed the suspect purchasing cleaning supplies before the crime, so it can be concluded that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If surveillance footage showed the suspect purchasing cleaning supplies before the crime then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Surveillance footage showed the suspect purchasing cleaning supplies before the crime
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If surveillance footage showed the suspect purchasing cleaning supplies before the crime then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and surveillance footage showed the suspect purchasing cleaning supplies before the crime, so the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If surveillance footage showed the suspect purchasing cleaning supplies before the crime then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Surveillance footage showed the suspect purchasing cleaning supplies before the crime
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If surveillance footage showed the suspect purchasing cleaning supplies before the crime then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and surveillance footage showed the suspect purchasing cleaning supplies before the crime, which implies that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If surveillance footage showed the suspect purchasing cleaning supplies before the crime then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Surveillance footage showed the suspect purchasing cleaning supplies before the crime
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If surveillance footage showed the suspect purchasing cleaning supplies before the crime then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and surveillance footage showed the suspect purchasing cleaning supplies before the crime, which shows that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If surveillance footage showed the suspect purchasing cleaning supplies before the crime then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Surveillance footage showed the suspect purchasing cleaning supplies before the crime
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If surveillance footage showed the suspect purchasing cleaning supplies before the crime then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and surveillance footage showed the suspect purchasing cleaning supplies before the crime, which establishes that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If surveillance footage showed the suspect purchasing cleaning supplies before the crime then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Surveillance footage showed the suspect purchasing cleaning supplies before the crime
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, since if surveillance footage showed the suspect purchasing cleaning supplies before the crime then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and surveillance footage showed the suspect purchasing cleaning supplies before the crime.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If surveillance footage showed the suspect purchasing cleaning supplies before the crime then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Surveillance footage showed the suspect purchasing cleaning supplies before the crime
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, because if surveillance footage showed the suspect purchasing cleaning supplies before the crime then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and surveillance footage showed the suspect purchasing cleaning supplies before the crime.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If surveillance footage showed the suspect purchasing cleaning supplies before the crime then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Surveillance footage showed the suspect purchasing cleaning supplies before the crime
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, as if surveillance footage showed the suspect purchasing cleaning supplies before the crime then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and surveillance footage showed the suspect purchasing cleaning supplies before the crime.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If surveillance footage showed the suspect purchasing cleaning supplies before the crime then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Surveillance footage showed the suspect purchasing cleaning supplies before the crime
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If surveillance footage showed the suspect purchasing cleaning supplies before the crime then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, therefore surveillance footage did not show the suspect purchasing cleaning supplies before the crime.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If surveillance footage showed the suspect purchasing cleaning supplies before the crime then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Surveillance footage did not show the suspect purchasing cleaning supplies before the crime
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If surveillance footage showed the suspect purchasing cleaning supplies before the crime then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, hence surveillance footage did not show the suspect purchasing cleaning supplies before the crime.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If surveillance footage showed the suspect purchasing cleaning supplies before the crime then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Surveillance footage did not show the suspect purchasing cleaning supplies before the crime
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If surveillance footage showed the suspect purchasing cleaning supplies before the crime then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, thus surveillance footage did not show the suspect purchasing cleaning supplies before the crime.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If surveillance footage showed the suspect purchasing cleaning supplies before the crime then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Surveillance footage did not show the suspect purchasing cleaning supplies before the crime
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If surveillance footage showed the suspect purchasing cleaning supplies before the crime then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, so it can be concluded that surveillance footage did not show the suspect purchasing cleaning supplies before the crime.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If surveillance footage showed the suspect purchasing cleaning supplies before the crime then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Surveillance footage did not show the suspect purchasing cleaning supplies before the crime
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If surveillance footage showed the suspect purchasing cleaning supplies before the crime then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, so surveillance footage did not show the suspect purchasing cleaning supplies before the crime.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If surveillance footage showed the suspect purchasing cleaning supplies before the crime then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Surveillance footage did not show the suspect purchasing cleaning supplies before the crime
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If surveillance footage showed the suspect purchasing cleaning supplies before the crime then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which implies that surveillance footage did not show the suspect purchasing cleaning supplies before the crime.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If surveillance footage showed the suspect purchasing cleaning supplies before the crime then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Surveillance footage did not show the suspect purchasing cleaning supplies before the crime
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If surveillance footage showed the suspect purchasing cleaning supplies before the crime then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which shows that surveillance footage did not show the suspect purchasing cleaning supplies before the crime.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If surveillance footage showed the suspect purchasing cleaning supplies before the crime then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Surveillance footage did not show the suspect purchasing cleaning supplies before the crime
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If surveillance footage showed the suspect purchasing cleaning supplies before the crime then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which establishes that surveillance footage did not show the suspect purchasing cleaning supplies before the crime.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If surveillance footage showed the suspect purchasing cleaning supplies before the crime then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Surveillance footage did not show the suspect purchasing cleaning supplies before the crime
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```Surveillance footage did not show the suspect purchasing cleaning supplies before the crime, since if surveillance footage showed the suspect purchasing cleaning supplies before the crime then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If surveillance footage showed the suspect purchasing cleaning supplies before the crime then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Surveillance footage did not show the suspect purchasing cleaning supplies before the crime
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```Surveillance footage did not show the suspect purchasing cleaning supplies before the crime, because if surveillance footage showed the suspect purchasing cleaning supplies before the crime then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If surveillance footage showed the suspect purchasing cleaning supplies before the crime then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Surveillance footage did not show the suspect purchasing cleaning supplies before the crime
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```Surveillance footage did not show the suspect purchasing cleaning supplies before the crime, as if surveillance footage showed the suspect purchasing cleaning supplies before the crime then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If surveillance footage showed the suspect purchasing cleaning supplies before the crime then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Surveillance footage did not show the suspect purchasing cleaning supplies before the crime
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a mysterious envelope containing cash was delivered to the victim's residence then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a mysterious envelope containing cash was delivered to the victim's residence, therefore the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a mysterious envelope containing cash was delivered to the victim's residence then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A mysterious envelope containing cash was delivered to the victim's residence
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a mysterious envelope containing cash was delivered to the victim's residence then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a mysterious envelope containing cash was delivered to the victim's residence, hence the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a mysterious envelope containing cash was delivered to the victim's residence then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A mysterious envelope containing cash was delivered to the victim's residence
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a mysterious envelope containing cash was delivered to the victim's residence then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a mysterious envelope containing cash was delivered to the victim's residence, thus the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a mysterious envelope containing cash was delivered to the victim's residence then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A mysterious envelope containing cash was delivered to the victim's residence
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a mysterious envelope containing cash was delivered to the victim's residence then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a mysterious envelope containing cash was delivered to the victim's residence, so it can be concluded that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a mysterious envelope containing cash was delivered to the victim's residence then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A mysterious envelope containing cash was delivered to the victim's residence
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a mysterious envelope containing cash was delivered to the victim's residence then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a mysterious envelope containing cash was delivered to the victim's residence, so the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a mysterious envelope containing cash was delivered to the victim's residence then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A mysterious envelope containing cash was delivered to the victim's residence
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a mysterious envelope containing cash was delivered to the victim's residence then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a mysterious envelope containing cash was delivered to the victim's residence, which implies that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a mysterious envelope containing cash was delivered to the victim's residence then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A mysterious envelope containing cash was delivered to the victim's residence
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a mysterious envelope containing cash was delivered to the victim's residence then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a mysterious envelope containing cash was delivered to the victim's residence, which shows that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a mysterious envelope containing cash was delivered to the victim's residence then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A mysterious envelope containing cash was delivered to the victim's residence
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a mysterious envelope containing cash was delivered to the victim's residence then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a mysterious envelope containing cash was delivered to the victim's residence, which establishes that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a mysterious envelope containing cash was delivered to the victim's residence then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A mysterious envelope containing cash was delivered to the victim's residence
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, since if a mysterious envelope containing cash was delivered to the victim's residence then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and a mysterious envelope containing cash was delivered to the victim's residence.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a mysterious envelope containing cash was delivered to the victim's residence then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A mysterious envelope containing cash was delivered to the victim's residence
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, because if a mysterious envelope containing cash was delivered to the victim's residence then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and a mysterious envelope containing cash was delivered to the victim's residence.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a mysterious envelope containing cash was delivered to the victim's residence then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A mysterious envelope containing cash was delivered to the victim's residence
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, as if a mysterious envelope containing cash was delivered to the victim's residence then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and a mysterious envelope containing cash was delivered to the victim's residence.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a mysterious envelope containing cash was delivered to the victim's residence then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A mysterious envelope containing cash was delivered to the victim's residence
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a mysterious envelope containing cash was delivered to the victim's residence then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, therefore no mysterious envelope containing cash was delivered to the victim's residence.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a mysterious envelope containing cash was delivered to the victim's residence then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: No mysterious envelope containing cash was delivered to the victim's residence
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a mysterious envelope containing cash was delivered to the victim's residence then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, hence no mysterious envelope containing cash was delivered to the victim's residence.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a mysterious envelope containing cash was delivered to the victim's residence then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: No mysterious envelope containing cash was delivered to the victim's residence
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a mysterious envelope containing cash was delivered to the victim's residence then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, thus no mysterious envelope containing cash was delivered to the victim's residence.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a mysterious envelope containing cash was delivered to the victim's residence then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: No mysterious envelope containing cash was delivered to the victim's residence
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a mysterious envelope containing cash was delivered to the victim's residence then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, so it can be concluded that no mysterious envelope containing cash was delivered to the victim's residence.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a mysterious envelope containing cash was delivered to the victim's residence then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: No mysterious envelope containing cash was delivered to the victim's residence
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a mysterious envelope containing cash was delivered to the victim's residence then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, so no mysterious envelope containing cash was delivered to the victim's residence.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a mysterious envelope containing cash was delivered to the victim's residence then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: No mysterious envelope containing cash was delivered to the victim's residence
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a mysterious envelope containing cash was delivered to the victim's residence then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which implies that no mysterious envelope containing cash was delivered to the victim's residence.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a mysterious envelope containing cash was delivered to the victim's residence then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: No mysterious envelope containing cash was delivered to the victim's residence
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a mysterious envelope containing cash was delivered to the victim's residence then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which shows that no mysterious envelope containing cash was delivered to the victim's residence.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a mysterious envelope containing cash was delivered to the victim's residence then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: No mysterious envelope containing cash was delivered to the victim's residence
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a mysterious envelope containing cash was delivered to the victim's residence then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which establishes that no mysterious envelope containing cash was delivered to the victim's residence.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a mysterious envelope containing cash was delivered to the victim's residence then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: No mysterious envelope containing cash was delivered to the victim's residence
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.