<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street, and officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene, therefore the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
stringlengths 355
1.02k
|
|---|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, because if the suspect had a prior conviction for a similar crime then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the suspect had a prior conviction for a similar crime.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect had a prior conviction for a similar crime then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The suspect had a prior conviction for a similar crime
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, as if the suspect had a prior conviction for a similar crime then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the suspect had a prior conviction for a similar crime.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect had a prior conviction for a similar crime then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The suspect had a prior conviction for a similar crime
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the suspect had a prior conviction for a similar crime then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, therefore the suspect did not have a prior conviction for a similar crime.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect had a prior conviction for a similar crime then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The suspect did not have a prior conviction for a similar crime
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the suspect had a prior conviction for a similar crime then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, hence the suspect did not have a prior conviction for a similar crime.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect had a prior conviction for a similar crime then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The suspect did not have a prior conviction for a similar crime
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the suspect had a prior conviction for a similar crime then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, thus the suspect did not have a prior conviction for a similar crime.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect had a prior conviction for a similar crime then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The suspect did not have a prior conviction for a similar crime
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the suspect had a prior conviction for a similar crime then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, so it can be concluded that the suspect did not have a prior conviction for a similar crime.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect had a prior conviction for a similar crime then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The suspect did not have a prior conviction for a similar crime
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the suspect had a prior conviction for a similar crime then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, so the suspect did not have a prior conviction for a similar crime.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect had a prior conviction for a similar crime then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The suspect did not have a prior conviction for a similar crime
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the suspect had a prior conviction for a similar crime then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which implies that the suspect did not have a prior conviction for a similar crime.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect had a prior conviction for a similar crime then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The suspect did not have a prior conviction for a similar crime
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the suspect had a prior conviction for a similar crime then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which shows that the suspect did not have a prior conviction for a similar crime.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect had a prior conviction for a similar crime then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The suspect did not have a prior conviction for a similar crime
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the suspect had a prior conviction for a similar crime then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which establishes that the suspect did not have a prior conviction for a similar crime.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect had a prior conviction for a similar crime then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The suspect did not have a prior conviction for a similar crime
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The suspect did not have a prior conviction for a similar crime, since if the suspect had a prior conviction for a similar crime then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect had a prior conviction for a similar crime then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The suspect did not have a prior conviction for a similar crime
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The suspect did not have a prior conviction for a similar crime, because if the suspect had a prior conviction for a similar crime then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect had a prior conviction for a similar crime then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The suspect did not have a prior conviction for a similar crime
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The suspect did not have a prior conviction for a similar crime, as if the suspect had a prior conviction for a similar crime then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect had a prior conviction for a similar crime then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The suspect did not have a prior conviction for a similar crime
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a witness remembered hearing a gunshot in the early hours of the morning then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a witness remembered hearing a gunshot in the early hours of the morning, therefore the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a witness remembered hearing a gunshot in the early hours of the morning then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A witness remembered hearing a gunshot in the early hours of the morning
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a witness remembered hearing a gunshot in the early hours of the morning then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a witness remembered hearing a gunshot in the early hours of the morning, hence the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a witness remembered hearing a gunshot in the early hours of the morning then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A witness remembered hearing a gunshot in the early hours of the morning
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a witness remembered hearing a gunshot in the early hours of the morning then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a witness remembered hearing a gunshot in the early hours of the morning, thus the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a witness remembered hearing a gunshot in the early hours of the morning then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A witness remembered hearing a gunshot in the early hours of the morning
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a witness remembered hearing a gunshot in the early hours of the morning then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a witness remembered hearing a gunshot in the early hours of the morning, so it can be concluded that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a witness remembered hearing a gunshot in the early hours of the morning then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A witness remembered hearing a gunshot in the early hours of the morning
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a witness remembered hearing a gunshot in the early hours of the morning then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a witness remembered hearing a gunshot in the early hours of the morning, so the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a witness remembered hearing a gunshot in the early hours of the morning then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A witness remembered hearing a gunshot in the early hours of the morning
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a witness remembered hearing a gunshot in the early hours of the morning then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a witness remembered hearing a gunshot in the early hours of the morning, which implies that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a witness remembered hearing a gunshot in the early hours of the morning then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A witness remembered hearing a gunshot in the early hours of the morning
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a witness remembered hearing a gunshot in the early hours of the morning then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a witness remembered hearing a gunshot in the early hours of the morning, which shows that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a witness remembered hearing a gunshot in the early hours of the morning then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A witness remembered hearing a gunshot in the early hours of the morning
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a witness remembered hearing a gunshot in the early hours of the morning then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a witness remembered hearing a gunshot in the early hours of the morning, which establishes that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a witness remembered hearing a gunshot in the early hours of the morning then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A witness remembered hearing a gunshot in the early hours of the morning
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, since if a witness remembered hearing a gunshot in the early hours of the morning then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and a witness remembered hearing a gunshot in the early hours of the morning.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a witness remembered hearing a gunshot in the early hours of the morning then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A witness remembered hearing a gunshot in the early hours of the morning
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, because if a witness remembered hearing a gunshot in the early hours of the morning then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and a witness remembered hearing a gunshot in the early hours of the morning.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a witness remembered hearing a gunshot in the early hours of the morning then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A witness remembered hearing a gunshot in the early hours of the morning
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, as if a witness remembered hearing a gunshot in the early hours of the morning then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and a witness remembered hearing a gunshot in the early hours of the morning.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a witness remembered hearing a gunshot in the early hours of the morning then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A witness remembered hearing a gunshot in the early hours of the morning
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a witness remembered hearing a gunshot in the early hours of the morning then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, therefore no witness remembered hearing a gunshot in the early hours of the morning.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a witness remembered hearing a gunshot in the early hours of the morning then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: No witness remembered hearing a gunshot in the early hours of the morning
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a witness remembered hearing a gunshot in the early hours of the morning then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, hence no witness remembered hearing a gunshot in the early hours of the morning.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a witness remembered hearing a gunshot in the early hours of the morning then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: No witness remembered hearing a gunshot in the early hours of the morning
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a witness remembered hearing a gunshot in the early hours of the morning then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, thus no witness remembered hearing a gunshot in the early hours of the morning.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a witness remembered hearing a gunshot in the early hours of the morning then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: No witness remembered hearing a gunshot in the early hours of the morning
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a witness remembered hearing a gunshot in the early hours of the morning then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, so it can be concluded that no witness remembered hearing a gunshot in the early hours of the morning.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a witness remembered hearing a gunshot in the early hours of the morning then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: No witness remembered hearing a gunshot in the early hours of the morning
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a witness remembered hearing a gunshot in the early hours of the morning then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, so no witness remembered hearing a gunshot in the early hours of the morning.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a witness remembered hearing a gunshot in the early hours of the morning then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: No witness remembered hearing a gunshot in the early hours of the morning
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a witness remembered hearing a gunshot in the early hours of the morning then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which implies that no witness remembered hearing a gunshot in the early hours of the morning.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a witness remembered hearing a gunshot in the early hours of the morning then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: No witness remembered hearing a gunshot in the early hours of the morning
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a witness remembered hearing a gunshot in the early hours of the morning then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which shows that no witness remembered hearing a gunshot in the early hours of the morning.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a witness remembered hearing a gunshot in the early hours of the morning then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: No witness remembered hearing a gunshot in the early hours of the morning
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a witness remembered hearing a gunshot in the early hours of the morning then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which establishes that no witness remembered hearing a gunshot in the early hours of the morning.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a witness remembered hearing a gunshot in the early hours of the morning then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: No witness remembered hearing a gunshot in the early hours of the morning
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```No witness remembered hearing a gunshot in the early hours of the morning, since if a witness remembered hearing a gunshot in the early hours of the morning then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a witness remembered hearing a gunshot in the early hours of the morning then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: No witness remembered hearing a gunshot in the early hours of the morning
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```No witness remembered hearing a gunshot in the early hours of the morning, because if a witness remembered hearing a gunshot in the early hours of the morning then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a witness remembered hearing a gunshot in the early hours of the morning then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: No witness remembered hearing a gunshot in the early hours of the morning
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```No witness remembered hearing a gunshot in the early hours of the morning, as if a witness remembered hearing a gunshot in the early hours of the morning then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a witness remembered hearing a gunshot in the early hours of the morning then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: No witness remembered hearing a gunshot in the early hours of the morning
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a forensic expert found gunshot residue on the suspect's clothing then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a forensic expert found gunshot residue on the suspect's clothing, therefore the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a forensic expert found gunshot residue on the suspect's clothing then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A forensic expert found gunshot residue on the suspect's clothing
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a forensic expert found gunshot residue on the suspect's clothing then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a forensic expert found gunshot residue on the suspect's clothing, hence the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a forensic expert found gunshot residue on the suspect's clothing then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A forensic expert found gunshot residue on the suspect's clothing
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a forensic expert found gunshot residue on the suspect's clothing then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a forensic expert found gunshot residue on the suspect's clothing, thus the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a forensic expert found gunshot residue on the suspect's clothing then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A forensic expert found gunshot residue on the suspect's clothing
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a forensic expert found gunshot residue on the suspect's clothing then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a forensic expert found gunshot residue on the suspect's clothing, so it can be concluded that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a forensic expert found gunshot residue on the suspect's clothing then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A forensic expert found gunshot residue on the suspect's clothing
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a forensic expert found gunshot residue on the suspect's clothing then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a forensic expert found gunshot residue on the suspect's clothing, so the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a forensic expert found gunshot residue on the suspect's clothing then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A forensic expert found gunshot residue on the suspect's clothing
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a forensic expert found gunshot residue on the suspect's clothing then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a forensic expert found gunshot residue on the suspect's clothing, which implies that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a forensic expert found gunshot residue on the suspect's clothing then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A forensic expert found gunshot residue on the suspect's clothing
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a forensic expert found gunshot residue on the suspect's clothing then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a forensic expert found gunshot residue on the suspect's clothing, which shows that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a forensic expert found gunshot residue on the suspect's clothing then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A forensic expert found gunshot residue on the suspect's clothing
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a forensic expert found gunshot residue on the suspect's clothing then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a forensic expert found gunshot residue on the suspect's clothing, which establishes that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a forensic expert found gunshot residue on the suspect's clothing then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A forensic expert found gunshot residue on the suspect's clothing
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, since if a forensic expert found gunshot residue on the suspect's clothing then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and a forensic expert found gunshot residue on the suspect's clothing.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a forensic expert found gunshot residue on the suspect's clothing then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A forensic expert found gunshot residue on the suspect's clothing
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, because if a forensic expert found gunshot residue on the suspect's clothing then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and a forensic expert found gunshot residue on the suspect's clothing.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a forensic expert found gunshot residue on the suspect's clothing then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A forensic expert found gunshot residue on the suspect's clothing
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, as if a forensic expert found gunshot residue on the suspect's clothing then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and a forensic expert found gunshot residue on the suspect's clothing.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a forensic expert found gunshot residue on the suspect's clothing then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A forensic expert found gunshot residue on the suspect's clothing
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a forensic expert found gunshot residue on the suspect's clothing then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, therefore a forensic expert did not find gunshot residue on the suspect's clothing.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a forensic expert found gunshot residue on the suspect's clothing then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: A forensic expert did not find gunshot residue on the suspect's clothing
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a forensic expert found gunshot residue on the suspect's clothing then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, hence a forensic expert did not find gunshot residue on the suspect's clothing.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a forensic expert found gunshot residue on the suspect's clothing then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: A forensic expert did not find gunshot residue on the suspect's clothing
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a forensic expert found gunshot residue on the suspect's clothing then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, thus a forensic expert did not find gunshot residue on the suspect's clothing.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a forensic expert found gunshot residue on the suspect's clothing then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: A forensic expert did not find gunshot residue on the suspect's clothing
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a forensic expert found gunshot residue on the suspect's clothing then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, so it can be concluded that a forensic expert did not find gunshot residue on the suspect's clothing.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a forensic expert found gunshot residue on the suspect's clothing then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: A forensic expert did not find gunshot residue on the suspect's clothing
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a forensic expert found gunshot residue on the suspect's clothing then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, so a forensic expert did not find gunshot residue on the suspect's clothing.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a forensic expert found gunshot residue on the suspect's clothing then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: A forensic expert did not find gunshot residue on the suspect's clothing
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a forensic expert found gunshot residue on the suspect's clothing then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which implies that a forensic expert did not find gunshot residue on the suspect's clothing.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a forensic expert found gunshot residue on the suspect's clothing then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: A forensic expert did not find gunshot residue on the suspect's clothing
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a forensic expert found gunshot residue on the suspect's clothing then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which shows that a forensic expert did not find gunshot residue on the suspect's clothing.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a forensic expert found gunshot residue on the suspect's clothing then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: A forensic expert did not find gunshot residue on the suspect's clothing
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a forensic expert found gunshot residue on the suspect's clothing then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which establishes that a forensic expert did not find gunshot residue on the suspect's clothing.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a forensic expert found gunshot residue on the suspect's clothing then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: A forensic expert did not find gunshot residue on the suspect's clothing
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```A forensic expert did not find gunshot residue on the suspect's clothing, since if a forensic expert found gunshot residue on the suspect's clothing then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a forensic expert found gunshot residue on the suspect's clothing then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: A forensic expert did not find gunshot residue on the suspect's clothing
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```A forensic expert did not find gunshot residue on the suspect's clothing, because if a forensic expert found gunshot residue on the suspect's clothing then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a forensic expert found gunshot residue on the suspect's clothing then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: A forensic expert did not find gunshot residue on the suspect's clothing
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```A forensic expert did not find gunshot residue on the suspect's clothing, as if a forensic expert found gunshot residue on the suspect's clothing then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a forensic expert found gunshot residue on the suspect's clothing then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: A forensic expert did not find gunshot residue on the suspect's clothing
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim's social media accounts contained threats from an anonymous user then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the victim's social media accounts contained threats from an anonymous user, therefore the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's social media accounts contained threats from an anonymous user then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The victim's social media accounts contained threats from an anonymous user
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim's social media accounts contained threats from an anonymous user then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the victim's social media accounts contained threats from an anonymous user, hence the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's social media accounts contained threats from an anonymous user then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The victim's social media accounts contained threats from an anonymous user
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim's social media accounts contained threats from an anonymous user then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the victim's social media accounts contained threats from an anonymous user, thus the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's social media accounts contained threats from an anonymous user then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The victim's social media accounts contained threats from an anonymous user
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim's social media accounts contained threats from an anonymous user then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the victim's social media accounts contained threats from an anonymous user, so it can be concluded that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's social media accounts contained threats from an anonymous user then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The victim's social media accounts contained threats from an anonymous user
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim's social media accounts contained threats from an anonymous user then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the victim's social media accounts contained threats from an anonymous user, so the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's social media accounts contained threats from an anonymous user then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The victim's social media accounts contained threats from an anonymous user
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim's social media accounts contained threats from an anonymous user then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the victim's social media accounts contained threats from an anonymous user, which implies that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's social media accounts contained threats from an anonymous user then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The victim's social media accounts contained threats from an anonymous user
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim's social media accounts contained threats from an anonymous user then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the victim's social media accounts contained threats from an anonymous user, which shows that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's social media accounts contained threats from an anonymous user then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The victim's social media accounts contained threats from an anonymous user
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim's social media accounts contained threats from an anonymous user then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the victim's social media accounts contained threats from an anonymous user, which establishes that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's social media accounts contained threats from an anonymous user then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The victim's social media accounts contained threats from an anonymous user
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, since if the victim's social media accounts contained threats from an anonymous user then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the victim's social media accounts contained threats from an anonymous user.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's social media accounts contained threats from an anonymous user then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The victim's social media accounts contained threats from an anonymous user
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, because if the victim's social media accounts contained threats from an anonymous user then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the victim's social media accounts contained threats from an anonymous user.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's social media accounts contained threats from an anonymous user then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The victim's social media accounts contained threats from an anonymous user
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, as if the victim's social media accounts contained threats from an anonymous user then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the victim's social media accounts contained threats from an anonymous user.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's social media accounts contained threats from an anonymous user then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The victim's social media accounts contained threats from an anonymous user
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim's social media accounts contained threats from an anonymous user then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, therefore the victim's social media accounts did not contain threats from an anonymous user.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's social media accounts contained threats from an anonymous user then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The victim's social media accounts did not contain threats from an anonymous user
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim's social media accounts contained threats from an anonymous user then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, hence the victim's social media accounts did not contain threats from an anonymous user.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's social media accounts contained threats from an anonymous user then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The victim's social media accounts did not contain threats from an anonymous user
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim's social media accounts contained threats from an anonymous user then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, thus the victim's social media accounts did not contain threats from an anonymous user.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's social media accounts contained threats from an anonymous user then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The victim's social media accounts did not contain threats from an anonymous user
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim's social media accounts contained threats from an anonymous user then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, so it can be concluded that the victim's social media accounts did not contain threats from an anonymous user.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's social media accounts contained threats from an anonymous user then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The victim's social media accounts did not contain threats from an anonymous user
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim's social media accounts contained threats from an anonymous user then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, so the victim's social media accounts did not contain threats from an anonymous user.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's social media accounts contained threats from an anonymous user then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The victim's social media accounts did not contain threats from an anonymous user
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim's social media accounts contained threats from an anonymous user then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which implies that the victim's social media accounts did not contain threats from an anonymous user.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's social media accounts contained threats from an anonymous user then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The victim's social media accounts did not contain threats from an anonymous user
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim's social media accounts contained threats from an anonymous user then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which shows that the victim's social media accounts did not contain threats from an anonymous user.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's social media accounts contained threats from an anonymous user then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The victim's social media accounts did not contain threats from an anonymous user
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim's social media accounts contained threats from an anonymous user then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which establishes that the victim's social media accounts did not contain threats from an anonymous user.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's social media accounts contained threats from an anonymous user then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The victim's social media accounts did not contain threats from an anonymous user
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The victim's social media accounts did not contain threats from an anonymous user, since if the victim's social media accounts contained threats from an anonymous user then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's social media accounts contained threats from an anonymous user then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The victim's social media accounts did not contain threats from an anonymous user
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The victim's social media accounts did not contain threats from an anonymous user, because if the victim's social media accounts contained threats from an anonymous user then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's social media accounts contained threats from an anonymous user then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The victim's social media accounts did not contain threats from an anonymous user
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The victim's social media accounts did not contain threats from an anonymous user, as if the victim's social media accounts contained threats from an anonymous user then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's social media accounts contained threats from an anonymous user then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The victim's social media accounts did not contain threats from an anonymous user
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a security guard reported seeing the suspect acting suspiciously near the crime scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a security guard reported seeing the suspect acting suspiciously near the crime scene, therefore the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a security guard reported seeing the suspect acting suspiciously near the crime scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A security guard reported seeing the suspect acting suspiciously near the crime scene
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a security guard reported seeing the suspect acting suspiciously near the crime scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a security guard reported seeing the suspect acting suspiciously near the crime scene, hence the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a security guard reported seeing the suspect acting suspiciously near the crime scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A security guard reported seeing the suspect acting suspiciously near the crime scene
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a security guard reported seeing the suspect acting suspiciously near the crime scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a security guard reported seeing the suspect acting suspiciously near the crime scene, thus the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a security guard reported seeing the suspect acting suspiciously near the crime scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A security guard reported seeing the suspect acting suspiciously near the crime scene
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a security guard reported seeing the suspect acting suspiciously near the crime scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a security guard reported seeing the suspect acting suspiciously near the crime scene, so it can be concluded that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a security guard reported seeing the suspect acting suspiciously near the crime scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A security guard reported seeing the suspect acting suspiciously near the crime scene
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a security guard reported seeing the suspect acting suspiciously near the crime scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a security guard reported seeing the suspect acting suspiciously near the crime scene, so the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a security guard reported seeing the suspect acting suspiciously near the crime scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A security guard reported seeing the suspect acting suspiciously near the crime scene
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a security guard reported seeing the suspect acting suspiciously near the crime scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a security guard reported seeing the suspect acting suspiciously near the crime scene, which implies that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a security guard reported seeing the suspect acting suspiciously near the crime scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A security guard reported seeing the suspect acting suspiciously near the crime scene
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a security guard reported seeing the suspect acting suspiciously near the crime scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a security guard reported seeing the suspect acting suspiciously near the crime scene, which shows that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a security guard reported seeing the suspect acting suspiciously near the crime scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A security guard reported seeing the suspect acting suspiciously near the crime scene
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a security guard reported seeing the suspect acting suspiciously near the crime scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a security guard reported seeing the suspect acting suspiciously near the crime scene, which establishes that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a security guard reported seeing the suspect acting suspiciously near the crime scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A security guard reported seeing the suspect acting suspiciously near the crime scene
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, since if a security guard reported seeing the suspect acting suspiciously near the crime scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and a security guard reported seeing the suspect acting suspiciously near the crime scene.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a security guard reported seeing the suspect acting suspiciously near the crime scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A security guard reported seeing the suspect acting suspiciously near the crime scene
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, because if a security guard reported seeing the suspect acting suspiciously near the crime scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and a security guard reported seeing the suspect acting suspiciously near the crime scene.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a security guard reported seeing the suspect acting suspiciously near the crime scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A security guard reported seeing the suspect acting suspiciously near the crime scene
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, as if a security guard reported seeing the suspect acting suspiciously near the crime scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and a security guard reported seeing the suspect acting suspiciously near the crime scene.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a security guard reported seeing the suspect acting suspiciously near the crime scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A security guard reported seeing the suspect acting suspiciously near the crime scene
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a security guard reported seeing the suspect acting suspiciously near the crime scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, therefore no security guard reported seeing the suspect acting suspiciously near the crime scene.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a security guard reported seeing the suspect acting suspiciously near the crime scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: No security guard reported seeing the suspect acting suspiciously near the crime scene
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a security guard reported seeing the suspect acting suspiciously near the crime scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, hence no security guard reported seeing the suspect acting suspiciously near the crime scene.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a security guard reported seeing the suspect acting suspiciously near the crime scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: No security guard reported seeing the suspect acting suspiciously near the crime scene
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a security guard reported seeing the suspect acting suspiciously near the crime scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, thus no security guard reported seeing the suspect acting suspiciously near the crime scene.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a security guard reported seeing the suspect acting suspiciously near the crime scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: No security guard reported seeing the suspect acting suspiciously near the crime scene
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a security guard reported seeing the suspect acting suspiciously near the crime scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, so it can be concluded that no security guard reported seeing the suspect acting suspiciously near the crime scene.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a security guard reported seeing the suspect acting suspiciously near the crime scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: No security guard reported seeing the suspect acting suspiciously near the crime scene
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a security guard reported seeing the suspect acting suspiciously near the crime scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, so no security guard reported seeing the suspect acting suspiciously near the crime scene.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a security guard reported seeing the suspect acting suspiciously near the crime scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: No security guard reported seeing the suspect acting suspiciously near the crime scene
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a security guard reported seeing the suspect acting suspiciously near the crime scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which implies that no security guard reported seeing the suspect acting suspiciously near the crime scene.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a security guard reported seeing the suspect acting suspiciously near the crime scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: No security guard reported seeing the suspect acting suspiciously near the crime scene
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a security guard reported seeing the suspect acting suspiciously near the crime scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which shows that no security guard reported seeing the suspect acting suspiciously near the crime scene.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a security guard reported seeing the suspect acting suspiciously near the crime scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: No security guard reported seeing the suspect acting suspiciously near the crime scene
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a security guard reported seeing the suspect acting suspiciously near the crime scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which establishes that no security guard reported seeing the suspect acting suspiciously near the crime scene.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a security guard reported seeing the suspect acting suspiciously near the crime scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: No security guard reported seeing the suspect acting suspiciously near the crime scene
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```No security guard reported seeing the suspect acting suspiciously near the crime scene, since if a security guard reported seeing the suspect acting suspiciously near the crime scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a security guard reported seeing the suspect acting suspiciously near the crime scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: No security guard reported seeing the suspect acting suspiciously near the crime scene
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```No security guard reported seeing the suspect acting suspiciously near the crime scene, because if a security guard reported seeing the suspect acting suspiciously near the crime scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a security guard reported seeing the suspect acting suspiciously near the crime scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: No security guard reported seeing the suspect acting suspiciously near the crime scene
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.