<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street, and officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene, therefore the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
stringlengths 355
1.02k
|
|---|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the suspect had recently purchased a firearm matching the murder weapon then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, so the suspect had not recently purchased a firearm matching the murder weapon.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect had recently purchased a firearm matching the murder weapon then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The suspect had not recently purchased a firearm matching the murder weapon
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the suspect had recently purchased a firearm matching the murder weapon then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which implies that the suspect had not recently purchased a firearm matching the murder weapon.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect had recently purchased a firearm matching the murder weapon then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The suspect had not recently purchased a firearm matching the murder weapon
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the suspect had recently purchased a firearm matching the murder weapon then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which shows that the suspect had not recently purchased a firearm matching the murder weapon.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect had recently purchased a firearm matching the murder weapon then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The suspect had not recently purchased a firearm matching the murder weapon
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the suspect had recently purchased a firearm matching the murder weapon then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which establishes that the suspect had not recently purchased a firearm matching the murder weapon.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect had recently purchased a firearm matching the murder weapon then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The suspect had not recently purchased a firearm matching the murder weapon
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The suspect had not recently purchased a firearm matching the murder weapon, since if the suspect had recently purchased a firearm matching the murder weapon then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect had recently purchased a firearm matching the murder weapon then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The suspect had not recently purchased a firearm matching the murder weapon
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The suspect had not recently purchased a firearm matching the murder weapon, because if the suspect had recently purchased a firearm matching the murder weapon then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect had recently purchased a firearm matching the murder weapon then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The suspect had not recently purchased a firearm matching the murder weapon
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The suspect had not recently purchased a firearm matching the murder weapon, as if the suspect had recently purchased a firearm matching the murder weapon then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect had recently purchased a firearm matching the murder weapon then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The suspect had not recently purchased a firearm matching the murder weapon
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a handwritten note with the victim's name was found in the suspect's wallet then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a handwritten note with the victim's name was found in the suspect's wallet, therefore the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a handwritten note with the victim's name was found in the suspect's wallet then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A handwritten note with the victim's name was found in the suspect's wallet
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a handwritten note with the victim's name was found in the suspect's wallet then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a handwritten note with the victim's name was found in the suspect's wallet, hence the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a handwritten note with the victim's name was found in the suspect's wallet then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A handwritten note with the victim's name was found in the suspect's wallet
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a handwritten note with the victim's name was found in the suspect's wallet then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a handwritten note with the victim's name was found in the suspect's wallet, thus the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a handwritten note with the victim's name was found in the suspect's wallet then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A handwritten note with the victim's name was found in the suspect's wallet
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a handwritten note with the victim's name was found in the suspect's wallet then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a handwritten note with the victim's name was found in the suspect's wallet, so it can be concluded that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a handwritten note with the victim's name was found in the suspect's wallet then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A handwritten note with the victim's name was found in the suspect's wallet
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a handwritten note with the victim's name was found in the suspect's wallet then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a handwritten note with the victim's name was found in the suspect's wallet, so the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a handwritten note with the victim's name was found in the suspect's wallet then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A handwritten note with the victim's name was found in the suspect's wallet
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a handwritten note with the victim's name was found in the suspect's wallet then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a handwritten note with the victim's name was found in the suspect's wallet, which implies that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a handwritten note with the victim's name was found in the suspect's wallet then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A handwritten note with the victim's name was found in the suspect's wallet
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a handwritten note with the victim's name was found in the suspect's wallet then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a handwritten note with the victim's name was found in the suspect's wallet, which shows that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a handwritten note with the victim's name was found in the suspect's wallet then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A handwritten note with the victim's name was found in the suspect's wallet
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a handwritten note with the victim's name was found in the suspect's wallet then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a handwritten note with the victim's name was found in the suspect's wallet, which establishes that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a handwritten note with the victim's name was found in the suspect's wallet then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A handwritten note with the victim's name was found in the suspect's wallet
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, since if a handwritten note with the victim's name was found in the suspect's wallet then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and a handwritten note with the victim's name was found in the suspect's wallet.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a handwritten note with the victim's name was found in the suspect's wallet then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A handwritten note with the victim's name was found in the suspect's wallet
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, because if a handwritten note with the victim's name was found in the suspect's wallet then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and a handwritten note with the victim's name was found in the suspect's wallet.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a handwritten note with the victim's name was found in the suspect's wallet then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A handwritten note with the victim's name was found in the suspect's wallet
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, as if a handwritten note with the victim's name was found in the suspect's wallet then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and a handwritten note with the victim's name was found in the suspect's wallet.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a handwritten note with the victim's name was found in the suspect's wallet then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A handwritten note with the victim's name was found in the suspect's wallet
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a handwritten note with the victim's name was found in the suspect's wallet then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, therefore no handwritten note with the victim's name was found in the suspect's wallet.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a handwritten note with the victim's name was found in the suspect's wallet then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: No handwritten note with the victim's name was found in the suspect's wallet
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a handwritten note with the victim's name was found in the suspect's wallet then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, hence no handwritten note with the victim's name was found in the suspect's wallet.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a handwritten note with the victim's name was found in the suspect's wallet then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: No handwritten note with the victim's name was found in the suspect's wallet
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a handwritten note with the victim's name was found in the suspect's wallet then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, thus no handwritten note with the victim's name was found in the suspect's wallet.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a handwritten note with the victim's name was found in the suspect's wallet then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: No handwritten note with the victim's name was found in the suspect's wallet
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a handwritten note with the victim's name was found in the suspect's wallet then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, so it can be concluded that no handwritten note with the victim's name was found in the suspect's wallet.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a handwritten note with the victim's name was found in the suspect's wallet then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: No handwritten note with the victim's name was found in the suspect's wallet
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a handwritten note with the victim's name was found in the suspect's wallet then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, so no handwritten note with the victim's name was found in the suspect's wallet.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a handwritten note with the victim's name was found in the suspect's wallet then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: No handwritten note with the victim's name was found in the suspect's wallet
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a handwritten note with the victim's name was found in the suspect's wallet then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which implies that no handwritten note with the victim's name was found in the suspect's wallet.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a handwritten note with the victim's name was found in the suspect's wallet then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: No handwritten note with the victim's name was found in the suspect's wallet
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a handwritten note with the victim's name was found in the suspect's wallet then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which shows that no handwritten note with the victim's name was found in the suspect's wallet.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a handwritten note with the victim's name was found in the suspect's wallet then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: No handwritten note with the victim's name was found in the suspect's wallet
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a handwritten note with the victim's name was found in the suspect's wallet then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which establishes that no handwritten note with the victim's name was found in the suspect's wallet.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a handwritten note with the victim's name was found in the suspect's wallet then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: No handwritten note with the victim's name was found in the suspect's wallet
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```No handwritten note with the victim's name was found in the suspect's wallet, since if a handwritten note with the victim's name was found in the suspect's wallet then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a handwritten note with the victim's name was found in the suspect's wallet then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: No handwritten note with the victim's name was found in the suspect's wallet
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```No handwritten note with the victim's name was found in the suspect's wallet, because if a handwritten note with the victim's name was found in the suspect's wallet then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a handwritten note with the victim's name was found in the suspect's wallet then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: No handwritten note with the victim's name was found in the suspect's wallet
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```No handwritten note with the victim's name was found in the suspect's wallet, as if a handwritten note with the victim's name was found in the suspect's wallet then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a handwritten note with the victim's name was found in the suspect's wallet then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: No handwritten note with the victim's name was found in the suspect's wallet
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim's car keys were missing from their apartment then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the victim's car keys were missing from their apartment, therefore the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's car keys were missing from their apartment then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The victim's car keys were missing from their apartment
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim's car keys were missing from their apartment then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the victim's car keys were missing from their apartment, hence the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's car keys were missing from their apartment then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The victim's car keys were missing from their apartment
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim's car keys were missing from their apartment then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the victim's car keys were missing from their apartment, thus the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's car keys were missing from their apartment then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The victim's car keys were missing from their apartment
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim's car keys were missing from their apartment then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the victim's car keys were missing from their apartment, so it can be concluded that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's car keys were missing from their apartment then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The victim's car keys were missing from their apartment
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim's car keys were missing from their apartment then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the victim's car keys were missing from their apartment, so the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's car keys were missing from their apartment then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The victim's car keys were missing from their apartment
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim's car keys were missing from their apartment then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the victim's car keys were missing from their apartment, which implies that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's car keys were missing from their apartment then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The victim's car keys were missing from their apartment
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim's car keys were missing from their apartment then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the victim's car keys were missing from their apartment, which shows that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's car keys were missing from their apartment then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The victim's car keys were missing from their apartment
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim's car keys were missing from their apartment then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the victim's car keys were missing from their apartment, which establishes that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's car keys were missing from their apartment then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The victim's car keys were missing from their apartment
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, since if the victim's car keys were missing from their apartment then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the victim's car keys were missing from their apartment.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's car keys were missing from their apartment then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The victim's car keys were missing from their apartment
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, because if the victim's car keys were missing from their apartment then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the victim's car keys were missing from their apartment.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's car keys were missing from their apartment then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The victim's car keys were missing from their apartment
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, as if the victim's car keys were missing from their apartment then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the victim's car keys were missing from their apartment.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's car keys were missing from their apartment then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The victim's car keys were missing from their apartment
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim's car keys were missing from their apartment then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, therefore the victim's car keys were not missing from their apartment.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's car keys were missing from their apartment then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The victim's car keys were not missing from their apartment
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim's car keys were missing from their apartment then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, hence the victim's car keys were not missing from their apartment.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's car keys were missing from their apartment then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The victim's car keys were not missing from their apartment
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim's car keys were missing from their apartment then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, thus the victim's car keys were not missing from their apartment.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's car keys were missing from their apartment then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The victim's car keys were not missing from their apartment
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim's car keys were missing from their apartment then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, so it can be concluded that the victim's car keys were not missing from their apartment.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's car keys were missing from their apartment then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The victim's car keys were not missing from their apartment
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim's car keys were missing from their apartment then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, so the victim's car keys were not missing from their apartment.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's car keys were missing from their apartment then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The victim's car keys were not missing from their apartment
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim's car keys were missing from their apartment then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which implies that the victim's car keys were not missing from their apartment.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's car keys were missing from their apartment then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The victim's car keys were not missing from their apartment
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim's car keys were missing from their apartment then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which shows that the victim's car keys were not missing from their apartment.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's car keys were missing from their apartment then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The victim's car keys were not missing from their apartment
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim's car keys were missing from their apartment then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which establishes that the victim's car keys were not missing from their apartment.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's car keys were missing from their apartment then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The victim's car keys were not missing from their apartment
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The victim's car keys were not missing from their apartment, since if the victim's car keys were missing from their apartment then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's car keys were missing from their apartment then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The victim's car keys were not missing from their apartment
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The victim's car keys were not missing from their apartment, because if the victim's car keys were missing from their apartment then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's car keys were missing from their apartment then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The victim's car keys were not missing from their apartment
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The victim's car keys were not missing from their apartment, as if the victim's car keys were missing from their apartment then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's car keys were missing from their apartment then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The victim's car keys were not missing from their apartment
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the suspect had a history of mental health issues then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the suspect had a history of mental health issues, therefore the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect had a history of mental health issues then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The suspect had a history of mental health issues
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the suspect had a history of mental health issues then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the suspect had a history of mental health issues, hence the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect had a history of mental health issues then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The suspect had a history of mental health issues
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the suspect had a history of mental health issues then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the suspect had a history of mental health issues, thus the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect had a history of mental health issues then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The suspect had a history of mental health issues
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the suspect had a history of mental health issues then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the suspect had a history of mental health issues, so it can be concluded that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect had a history of mental health issues then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The suspect had a history of mental health issues
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the suspect had a history of mental health issues then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the suspect had a history of mental health issues, so the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect had a history of mental health issues then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The suspect had a history of mental health issues
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the suspect had a history of mental health issues then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the suspect had a history of mental health issues, which implies that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect had a history of mental health issues then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The suspect had a history of mental health issues
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the suspect had a history of mental health issues then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the suspect had a history of mental health issues, which shows that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect had a history of mental health issues then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The suspect had a history of mental health issues
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the suspect had a history of mental health issues then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the suspect had a history of mental health issues, which establishes that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect had a history of mental health issues then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The suspect had a history of mental health issues
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, since if the suspect had a history of mental health issues then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the suspect had a history of mental health issues.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect had a history of mental health issues then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The suspect had a history of mental health issues
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, because if the suspect had a history of mental health issues then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the suspect had a history of mental health issues.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect had a history of mental health issues then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The suspect had a history of mental health issues
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, as if the suspect had a history of mental health issues then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the suspect had a history of mental health issues.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect had a history of mental health issues then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The suspect had a history of mental health issues
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the suspect had a history of mental health issues then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, therefore the suspect had no history of mental health issues.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect had a history of mental health issues then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The suspect had no history of mental health issues
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the suspect had a history of mental health issues then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, hence the suspect had no history of mental health issues.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect had a history of mental health issues then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The suspect had no history of mental health issues
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the suspect had a history of mental health issues then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, thus the suspect had no history of mental health issues.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect had a history of mental health issues then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The suspect had no history of mental health issues
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the suspect had a history of mental health issues then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, so it can be concluded that the suspect had no history of mental health issues.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect had a history of mental health issues then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The suspect had no history of mental health issues
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the suspect had a history of mental health issues then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, so the suspect had no history of mental health issues.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect had a history of mental health issues then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The suspect had no history of mental health issues
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the suspect had a history of mental health issues then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which implies that the suspect had no history of mental health issues.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect had a history of mental health issues then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The suspect had no history of mental health issues
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the suspect had a history of mental health issues then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which shows that the suspect had no history of mental health issues.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect had a history of mental health issues then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The suspect had no history of mental health issues
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the suspect had a history of mental health issues then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which establishes that the suspect had no history of mental health issues.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect had a history of mental health issues then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The suspect had no history of mental health issues
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The suspect had no history of mental health issues, since if the suspect had a history of mental health issues then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect had a history of mental health issues then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The suspect had no history of mental health issues
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The suspect had no history of mental health issues, because if the suspect had a history of mental health issues then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect had a history of mental health issues then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The suspect had no history of mental health issues
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The suspect had no history of mental health issues, as if the suspect had a history of mental health issues then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect had a history of mental health issues then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The suspect had no history of mental health issues
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a forensic expert identified the suspect's hair at the crime scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a forensic expert identified the suspect's hair at the crime scene, therefore the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a forensic expert identified the suspect's hair at the crime scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A forensic expert identified the suspect's hair at the crime scene
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a forensic expert identified the suspect's hair at the crime scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a forensic expert identified the suspect's hair at the crime scene, hence the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a forensic expert identified the suspect's hair at the crime scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A forensic expert identified the suspect's hair at the crime scene
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a forensic expert identified the suspect's hair at the crime scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a forensic expert identified the suspect's hair at the crime scene, thus the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a forensic expert identified the suspect's hair at the crime scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A forensic expert identified the suspect's hair at the crime scene
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a forensic expert identified the suspect's hair at the crime scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a forensic expert identified the suspect's hair at the crime scene, so it can be concluded that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a forensic expert identified the suspect's hair at the crime scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A forensic expert identified the suspect's hair at the crime scene
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a forensic expert identified the suspect's hair at the crime scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a forensic expert identified the suspect's hair at the crime scene, so the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a forensic expert identified the suspect's hair at the crime scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A forensic expert identified the suspect's hair at the crime scene
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a forensic expert identified the suspect's hair at the crime scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a forensic expert identified the suspect's hair at the crime scene, which implies that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a forensic expert identified the suspect's hair at the crime scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A forensic expert identified the suspect's hair at the crime scene
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a forensic expert identified the suspect's hair at the crime scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a forensic expert identified the suspect's hair at the crime scene, which shows that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a forensic expert identified the suspect's hair at the crime scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A forensic expert identified the suspect's hair at the crime scene
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a forensic expert identified the suspect's hair at the crime scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a forensic expert identified the suspect's hair at the crime scene, which establishes that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a forensic expert identified the suspect's hair at the crime scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A forensic expert identified the suspect's hair at the crime scene
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, since if a forensic expert identified the suspect's hair at the crime scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and a forensic expert identified the suspect's hair at the crime scene.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a forensic expert identified the suspect's hair at the crime scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A forensic expert identified the suspect's hair at the crime scene
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, because if a forensic expert identified the suspect's hair at the crime scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and a forensic expert identified the suspect's hair at the crime scene.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a forensic expert identified the suspect's hair at the crime scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A forensic expert identified the suspect's hair at the crime scene
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, as if a forensic expert identified the suspect's hair at the crime scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and a forensic expert identified the suspect's hair at the crime scene.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a forensic expert identified the suspect's hair at the crime scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A forensic expert identified the suspect's hair at the crime scene
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a forensic expert identified the suspect's hair at the crime scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, therefore a forensic expert did not identify the suspect's hair at the crime scene.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a forensic expert identified the suspect's hair at the crime scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: A forensic expert did not identify the suspect's hair at the crime scene
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a forensic expert identified the suspect's hair at the crime scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, hence a forensic expert did not identify the suspect's hair at the crime scene.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a forensic expert identified the suspect's hair at the crime scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: A forensic expert did not identify the suspect's hair at the crime scene
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a forensic expert identified the suspect's hair at the crime scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, thus a forensic expert did not identify the suspect's hair at the crime scene.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a forensic expert identified the suspect's hair at the crime scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: A forensic expert did not identify the suspect's hair at the crime scene
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a forensic expert identified the suspect's hair at the crime scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, so it can be concluded that a forensic expert did not identify the suspect's hair at the crime scene.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a forensic expert identified the suspect's hair at the crime scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: A forensic expert did not identify the suspect's hair at the crime scene
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a forensic expert identified the suspect's hair at the crime scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, so a forensic expert did not identify the suspect's hair at the crime scene.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a forensic expert identified the suspect's hair at the crime scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: A forensic expert did not identify the suspect's hair at the crime scene
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a forensic expert identified the suspect's hair at the crime scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which implies that a forensic expert did not identify the suspect's hair at the crime scene.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a forensic expert identified the suspect's hair at the crime scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: A forensic expert did not identify the suspect's hair at the crime scene
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a forensic expert identified the suspect's hair at the crime scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which shows that a forensic expert did not identify the suspect's hair at the crime scene.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a forensic expert identified the suspect's hair at the crime scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: A forensic expert did not identify the suspect's hair at the crime scene
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a forensic expert identified the suspect's hair at the crime scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which establishes that a forensic expert did not identify the suspect's hair at the crime scene.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a forensic expert identified the suspect's hair at the crime scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: A forensic expert did not identify the suspect's hair at the crime scene
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```A forensic expert did not identify the suspect's hair at the crime scene, since if a forensic expert identified the suspect's hair at the crime scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a forensic expert identified the suspect's hair at the crime scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: A forensic expert did not identify the suspect's hair at the crime scene
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```A forensic expert did not identify the suspect's hair at the crime scene, because if a forensic expert identified the suspect's hair at the crime scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a forensic expert identified the suspect's hair at the crime scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: A forensic expert did not identify the suspect's hair at the crime scene
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```A forensic expert did not identify the suspect's hair at the crime scene, as if a forensic expert identified the suspect's hair at the crime scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a forensic expert identified the suspect's hair at the crime scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: A forensic expert did not identify the suspect's hair at the crime scene
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim's will had been recently updated, naming the suspect as the sole beneficiary then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the victim's will had been recently updated, naming the suspect as the sole beneficiary, therefore the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's will had been recently updated, naming the suspect as the sole beneficiary then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The victim's will had been recently updated, naming the suspect as the sole beneficiary
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim's will had been recently updated, naming the suspect as the sole beneficiary then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the victim's will had been recently updated, naming the suspect as the sole beneficiary, hence the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's will had been recently updated, naming the suspect as the sole beneficiary then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The victim's will had been recently updated, naming the suspect as the sole beneficiary
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim's will had been recently updated, naming the suspect as the sole beneficiary then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the victim's will had been recently updated, naming the suspect as the sole beneficiary, thus the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's will had been recently updated, naming the suspect as the sole beneficiary then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The victim's will had been recently updated, naming the suspect as the sole beneficiary
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim's will had been recently updated, naming the suspect as the sole beneficiary then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the victim's will had been recently updated, naming the suspect as the sole beneficiary, so it can be concluded that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's will had been recently updated, naming the suspect as the sole beneficiary then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The victim's will had been recently updated, naming the suspect as the sole beneficiary
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim's will had been recently updated, naming the suspect as the sole beneficiary then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the victim's will had been recently updated, naming the suspect as the sole beneficiary, so the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's will had been recently updated, naming the suspect as the sole beneficiary then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The victim's will had been recently updated, naming the suspect as the sole beneficiary
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.