<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street, and officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene, therefore the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
stringlengths 355
1.02k
|
|---|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim's computer had been wiped clean of all data then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which shows that the victim's computer had not been wiped clean of all data.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's computer had been wiped clean of all data then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The victim's computer had not been wiped clean of all data
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim's computer had been wiped clean of all data then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which establishes that the victim's computer had not been wiped clean of all data.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's computer had been wiped clean of all data then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The victim's computer had not been wiped clean of all data
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The victim's computer had not been wiped clean of all data, since if the victim's computer had been wiped clean of all data then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's computer had been wiped clean of all data then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The victim's computer had not been wiped clean of all data
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The victim's computer had not been wiped clean of all data, because if the victim's computer had been wiped clean of all data then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's computer had been wiped clean of all data then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The victim's computer had not been wiped clean of all data
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The victim's computer had not been wiped clean of all data, as if the victim's computer had been wiped clean of all data then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's computer had been wiped clean of all data then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The victim's computer had not been wiped clean of all data
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the suspect had recently purchased a shovel and other digging tools then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the suspect had recently purchased a shovel and other digging tools, therefore the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect had recently purchased a shovel and other digging tools then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The suspect had recently purchased a shovel and other digging tools
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the suspect had recently purchased a shovel and other digging tools then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the suspect had recently purchased a shovel and other digging tools, hence the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect had recently purchased a shovel and other digging tools then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The suspect had recently purchased a shovel and other digging tools
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the suspect had recently purchased a shovel and other digging tools then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the suspect had recently purchased a shovel and other digging tools, thus the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect had recently purchased a shovel and other digging tools then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The suspect had recently purchased a shovel and other digging tools
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the suspect had recently purchased a shovel and other digging tools then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the suspect had recently purchased a shovel and other digging tools, so it can be concluded that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect had recently purchased a shovel and other digging tools then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The suspect had recently purchased a shovel and other digging tools
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the suspect had recently purchased a shovel and other digging tools then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the suspect had recently purchased a shovel and other digging tools, so the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect had recently purchased a shovel and other digging tools then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The suspect had recently purchased a shovel and other digging tools
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the suspect had recently purchased a shovel and other digging tools then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the suspect had recently purchased a shovel and other digging tools, which implies that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect had recently purchased a shovel and other digging tools then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The suspect had recently purchased a shovel and other digging tools
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the suspect had recently purchased a shovel and other digging tools then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the suspect had recently purchased a shovel and other digging tools, which shows that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect had recently purchased a shovel and other digging tools then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The suspect had recently purchased a shovel and other digging tools
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the suspect had recently purchased a shovel and other digging tools then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the suspect had recently purchased a shovel and other digging tools, which establishes that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect had recently purchased a shovel and other digging tools then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The suspect had recently purchased a shovel and other digging tools
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, since if the suspect had recently purchased a shovel and other digging tools then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the suspect had recently purchased a shovel and other digging tools.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect had recently purchased a shovel and other digging tools then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The suspect had recently purchased a shovel and other digging tools
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, because if the suspect had recently purchased a shovel and other digging tools then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the suspect had recently purchased a shovel and other digging tools.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect had recently purchased a shovel and other digging tools then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The suspect had recently purchased a shovel and other digging tools
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, as if the suspect had recently purchased a shovel and other digging tools then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the suspect had recently purchased a shovel and other digging tools.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect had recently purchased a shovel and other digging tools then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The suspect had recently purchased a shovel and other digging tools
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the suspect had recently purchased a shovel and other digging tools then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, therefore the suspect had not recently purchased a shovel and other digging tools.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect had recently purchased a shovel and other digging tools then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The suspect had not recently purchased a shovel and other digging tools
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the suspect had recently purchased a shovel and other digging tools then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, hence the suspect had not recently purchased a shovel and other digging tools.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect had recently purchased a shovel and other digging tools then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The suspect had not recently purchased a shovel and other digging tools
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the suspect had recently purchased a shovel and other digging tools then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, thus the suspect had not recently purchased a shovel and other digging tools.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect had recently purchased a shovel and other digging tools then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The suspect had not recently purchased a shovel and other digging tools
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the suspect had recently purchased a shovel and other digging tools then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, so it can be concluded that the suspect had not recently purchased a shovel and other digging tools.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect had recently purchased a shovel and other digging tools then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The suspect had not recently purchased a shovel and other digging tools
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the suspect had recently purchased a shovel and other digging tools then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, so the suspect had not recently purchased a shovel and other digging tools.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect had recently purchased a shovel and other digging tools then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The suspect had not recently purchased a shovel and other digging tools
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the suspect had recently purchased a shovel and other digging tools then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which implies that the suspect had not recently purchased a shovel and other digging tools.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect had recently purchased a shovel and other digging tools then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The suspect had not recently purchased a shovel and other digging tools
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the suspect had recently purchased a shovel and other digging tools then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which shows that the suspect had not recently purchased a shovel and other digging tools.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect had recently purchased a shovel and other digging tools then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The suspect had not recently purchased a shovel and other digging tools
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the suspect had recently purchased a shovel and other digging tools then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which establishes that the suspect had not recently purchased a shovel and other digging tools.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect had recently purchased a shovel and other digging tools then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The suspect had not recently purchased a shovel and other digging tools
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The suspect had not recently purchased a shovel and other digging tools, since if the suspect had recently purchased a shovel and other digging tools then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect had recently purchased a shovel and other digging tools then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The suspect had not recently purchased a shovel and other digging tools
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The suspect had not recently purchased a shovel and other digging tools, because if the suspect had recently purchased a shovel and other digging tools then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect had recently purchased a shovel and other digging tools then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The suspect had not recently purchased a shovel and other digging tools
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The suspect had not recently purchased a shovel and other digging tools, as if the suspect had recently purchased a shovel and other digging tools then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect had recently purchased a shovel and other digging tools then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The suspect had not recently purchased a shovel and other digging tools
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a neighbor reported a strong odor coming from the suspect's backyard then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a neighbor reported a strong odor coming from the suspect's backyard, therefore the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a neighbor reported a strong odor coming from the suspect's backyard then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A neighbor reported a strong odor coming from the suspect's backyard
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a neighbor reported a strong odor coming from the suspect's backyard then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a neighbor reported a strong odor coming from the suspect's backyard, hence the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a neighbor reported a strong odor coming from the suspect's backyard then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A neighbor reported a strong odor coming from the suspect's backyard
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a neighbor reported a strong odor coming from the suspect's backyard then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a neighbor reported a strong odor coming from the suspect's backyard, thus the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a neighbor reported a strong odor coming from the suspect's backyard then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A neighbor reported a strong odor coming from the suspect's backyard
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a neighbor reported a strong odor coming from the suspect's backyard then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a neighbor reported a strong odor coming from the suspect's backyard, so it can be concluded that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a neighbor reported a strong odor coming from the suspect's backyard then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A neighbor reported a strong odor coming from the suspect's backyard
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a neighbor reported a strong odor coming from the suspect's backyard then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a neighbor reported a strong odor coming from the suspect's backyard, so the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a neighbor reported a strong odor coming from the suspect's backyard then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A neighbor reported a strong odor coming from the suspect's backyard
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a neighbor reported a strong odor coming from the suspect's backyard then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a neighbor reported a strong odor coming from the suspect's backyard, which implies that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a neighbor reported a strong odor coming from the suspect's backyard then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A neighbor reported a strong odor coming from the suspect's backyard
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a neighbor reported a strong odor coming from the suspect's backyard then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a neighbor reported a strong odor coming from the suspect's backyard, which shows that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a neighbor reported a strong odor coming from the suspect's backyard then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A neighbor reported a strong odor coming from the suspect's backyard
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a neighbor reported a strong odor coming from the suspect's backyard then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a neighbor reported a strong odor coming from the suspect's backyard, which establishes that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a neighbor reported a strong odor coming from the suspect's backyard then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A neighbor reported a strong odor coming from the suspect's backyard
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, since if a neighbor reported a strong odor coming from the suspect's backyard then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and a neighbor reported a strong odor coming from the suspect's backyard.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a neighbor reported a strong odor coming from the suspect's backyard then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A neighbor reported a strong odor coming from the suspect's backyard
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, because if a neighbor reported a strong odor coming from the suspect's backyard then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and a neighbor reported a strong odor coming from the suspect's backyard.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a neighbor reported a strong odor coming from the suspect's backyard then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A neighbor reported a strong odor coming from the suspect's backyard
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, as if a neighbor reported a strong odor coming from the suspect's backyard then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and a neighbor reported a strong odor coming from the suspect's backyard.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a neighbor reported a strong odor coming from the suspect's backyard then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A neighbor reported a strong odor coming from the suspect's backyard
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a neighbor reported a strong odor coming from the suspect's backyard then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, therefore a neighbor did not report a strong odor coming from the suspect's backyard.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a neighbor reported a strong odor coming from the suspect's backyard then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: A neighbor did not report a strong odor coming from the suspect's backyard
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a neighbor reported a strong odor coming from the suspect's backyard then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, hence a neighbor did not report a strong odor coming from the suspect's backyard.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a neighbor reported a strong odor coming from the suspect's backyard then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: A neighbor did not report a strong odor coming from the suspect's backyard
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a neighbor reported a strong odor coming from the suspect's backyard then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, thus a neighbor did not report a strong odor coming from the suspect's backyard.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a neighbor reported a strong odor coming from the suspect's backyard then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: A neighbor did not report a strong odor coming from the suspect's backyard
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a neighbor reported a strong odor coming from the suspect's backyard then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, so it can be concluded that a neighbor did not report a strong odor coming from the suspect's backyard.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a neighbor reported a strong odor coming from the suspect's backyard then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: A neighbor did not report a strong odor coming from the suspect's backyard
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a neighbor reported a strong odor coming from the suspect's backyard then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, so a neighbor did not report a strong odor coming from the suspect's backyard.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a neighbor reported a strong odor coming from the suspect's backyard then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: A neighbor did not report a strong odor coming from the suspect's backyard
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a neighbor reported a strong odor coming from the suspect's backyard then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which implies that a neighbor did not report a strong odor coming from the suspect's backyard.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a neighbor reported a strong odor coming from the suspect's backyard then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: A neighbor did not report a strong odor coming from the suspect's backyard
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a neighbor reported a strong odor coming from the suspect's backyard then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which shows that a neighbor did not report a strong odor coming from the suspect's backyard.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a neighbor reported a strong odor coming from the suspect's backyard then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: A neighbor did not report a strong odor coming from the suspect's backyard
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a neighbor reported a strong odor coming from the suspect's backyard then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which establishes that a neighbor did not report a strong odor coming from the suspect's backyard.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a neighbor reported a strong odor coming from the suspect's backyard then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: A neighbor did not report a strong odor coming from the suspect's backyard
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```A neighbor did not report a strong odor coming from the suspect's backyard, since if a neighbor reported a strong odor coming from the suspect's backyard then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a neighbor reported a strong odor coming from the suspect's backyard then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: A neighbor did not report a strong odor coming from the suspect's backyard
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```A neighbor did not report a strong odor coming from the suspect's backyard, because if a neighbor reported a strong odor coming from the suspect's backyard then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a neighbor reported a strong odor coming from the suspect's backyard then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: A neighbor did not report a strong odor coming from the suspect's backyard
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```A neighbor did not report a strong odor coming from the suspect's backyard, as if a neighbor reported a strong odor coming from the suspect's backyard then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a neighbor reported a strong odor coming from the suspect's backyard then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: A neighbor did not report a strong odor coming from the suspect's backyard
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim's life insurance policy had a double indemnity clause then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the victim's life insurance policy had a double indemnity clause, therefore the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's life insurance policy had a double indemnity clause then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The victim's life insurance policy had a double indemnity clause
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim's life insurance policy had a double indemnity clause then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the victim's life insurance policy had a double indemnity clause, hence the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's life insurance policy had a double indemnity clause then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The victim's life insurance policy had a double indemnity clause
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim's life insurance policy had a double indemnity clause then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the victim's life insurance policy had a double indemnity clause, thus the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's life insurance policy had a double indemnity clause then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The victim's life insurance policy had a double indemnity clause
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim's life insurance policy had a double indemnity clause then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the victim's life insurance policy had a double indemnity clause, so it can be concluded that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's life insurance policy had a double indemnity clause then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The victim's life insurance policy had a double indemnity clause
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim's life insurance policy had a double indemnity clause then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the victim's life insurance policy had a double indemnity clause, so the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's life insurance policy had a double indemnity clause then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The victim's life insurance policy had a double indemnity clause
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim's life insurance policy had a double indemnity clause then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the victim's life insurance policy had a double indemnity clause, which implies that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's life insurance policy had a double indemnity clause then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The victim's life insurance policy had a double indemnity clause
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim's life insurance policy had a double indemnity clause then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the victim's life insurance policy had a double indemnity clause, which shows that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's life insurance policy had a double indemnity clause then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The victim's life insurance policy had a double indemnity clause
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim's life insurance policy had a double indemnity clause then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the victim's life insurance policy had a double indemnity clause, which establishes that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's life insurance policy had a double indemnity clause then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The victim's life insurance policy had a double indemnity clause
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, since if the victim's life insurance policy had a double indemnity clause then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the victim's life insurance policy had a double indemnity clause.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's life insurance policy had a double indemnity clause then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The victim's life insurance policy had a double indemnity clause
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, because if the victim's life insurance policy had a double indemnity clause then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the victim's life insurance policy had a double indemnity clause.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's life insurance policy had a double indemnity clause then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The victim's life insurance policy had a double indemnity clause
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, as if the victim's life insurance policy had a double indemnity clause then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the victim's life insurance policy had a double indemnity clause.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's life insurance policy had a double indemnity clause then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The victim's life insurance policy had a double indemnity clause
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim's life insurance policy had a double indemnity clause then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, therefore the victim's life insurance policy did not have a double indemnity clause.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's life insurance policy had a double indemnity clause then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The victim's life insurance policy did not have a double indemnity clause
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim's life insurance policy had a double indemnity clause then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, hence the victim's life insurance policy did not have a double indemnity clause.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's life insurance policy had a double indemnity clause then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The victim's life insurance policy did not have a double indemnity clause
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim's life insurance policy had a double indemnity clause then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, thus the victim's life insurance policy did not have a double indemnity clause.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's life insurance policy had a double indemnity clause then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The victim's life insurance policy did not have a double indemnity clause
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim's life insurance policy had a double indemnity clause then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, so it can be concluded that the victim's life insurance policy did not have a double indemnity clause.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's life insurance policy had a double indemnity clause then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The victim's life insurance policy did not have a double indemnity clause
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim's life insurance policy had a double indemnity clause then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, so the victim's life insurance policy did not have a double indemnity clause.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's life insurance policy had a double indemnity clause then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The victim's life insurance policy did not have a double indemnity clause
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim's life insurance policy had a double indemnity clause then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which implies that the victim's life insurance policy did not have a double indemnity clause.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's life insurance policy had a double indemnity clause then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The victim's life insurance policy did not have a double indemnity clause
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim's life insurance policy had a double indemnity clause then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which shows that the victim's life insurance policy did not have a double indemnity clause.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's life insurance policy had a double indemnity clause then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The victim's life insurance policy did not have a double indemnity clause
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim's life insurance policy had a double indemnity clause then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which establishes that the victim's life insurance policy did not have a double indemnity clause.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's life insurance policy had a double indemnity clause then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The victim's life insurance policy did not have a double indemnity clause
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The victim's life insurance policy did not have a double indemnity clause, since if the victim's life insurance policy had a double indemnity clause then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's life insurance policy had a double indemnity clause then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The victim's life insurance policy did not have a double indemnity clause
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The victim's life insurance policy did not have a double indemnity clause, because if the victim's life insurance policy had a double indemnity clause then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's life insurance policy had a double indemnity clause then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The victim's life insurance policy did not have a double indemnity clause
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The victim's life insurance policy did not have a double indemnity clause, as if the victim's life insurance policy had a double indemnity clause then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's life insurance policy had a double indemnity clause then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The victim's life insurance policy did not have a double indemnity clause
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the suspect had a history of using aliases and false identities then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the suspect had a history of using aliases and false identities, therefore the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect had a history of using aliases and false identities then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The suspect had a history of using aliases and false identities
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the suspect had a history of using aliases and false identities then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the suspect had a history of using aliases and false identities, hence the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect had a history of using aliases and false identities then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The suspect had a history of using aliases and false identities
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the suspect had a history of using aliases and false identities then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the suspect had a history of using aliases and false identities, thus the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect had a history of using aliases and false identities then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The suspect had a history of using aliases and false identities
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the suspect had a history of using aliases and false identities then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the suspect had a history of using aliases and false identities, so it can be concluded that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect had a history of using aliases and false identities then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The suspect had a history of using aliases and false identities
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the suspect had a history of using aliases and false identities then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the suspect had a history of using aliases and false identities, so the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect had a history of using aliases and false identities then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The suspect had a history of using aliases and false identities
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the suspect had a history of using aliases and false identities then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the suspect had a history of using aliases and false identities, which implies that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect had a history of using aliases and false identities then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The suspect had a history of using aliases and false identities
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the suspect had a history of using aliases and false identities then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the suspect had a history of using aliases and false identities, which shows that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect had a history of using aliases and false identities then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The suspect had a history of using aliases and false identities
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the suspect had a history of using aliases and false identities then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the suspect had a history of using aliases and false identities, which establishes that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect had a history of using aliases and false identities then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The suspect had a history of using aliases and false identities
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, since if the suspect had a history of using aliases and false identities then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the suspect had a history of using aliases and false identities.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect had a history of using aliases and false identities then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The suspect had a history of using aliases and false identities
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, because if the suspect had a history of using aliases and false identities then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the suspect had a history of using aliases and false identities.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect had a history of using aliases and false identities then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The suspect had a history of using aliases and false identities
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, as if the suspect had a history of using aliases and false identities then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the suspect had a history of using aliases and false identities.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect had a history of using aliases and false identities then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The suspect had a history of using aliases and false identities
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the suspect had a history of using aliases and false identities then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, therefore the suspect had no history of using aliases and false identities.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect had a history of using aliases and false identities then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The suspect had no history of using aliases and false identities
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the suspect had a history of using aliases and false identities then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, hence the suspect had no history of using aliases and false identities.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect had a history of using aliases and false identities then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The suspect had no history of using aliases and false identities
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the suspect had a history of using aliases and false identities then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, thus the suspect had no history of using aliases and false identities.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect had a history of using aliases and false identities then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The suspect had no history of using aliases and false identities
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the suspect had a history of using aliases and false identities then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, so it can be concluded that the suspect had no history of using aliases and false identities.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect had a history of using aliases and false identities then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The suspect had no history of using aliases and false identities
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the suspect had a history of using aliases and false identities then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, so the suspect had no history of using aliases and false identities.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect had a history of using aliases and false identities then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The suspect had no history of using aliases and false identities
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the suspect had a history of using aliases and false identities then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which implies that the suspect had no history of using aliases and false identities.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect had a history of using aliases and false identities then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The suspect had no history of using aliases and false identities
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the suspect had a history of using aliases and false identities then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which shows that the suspect had no history of using aliases and false identities.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect had a history of using aliases and false identities then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The suspect had no history of using aliases and false identities
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the suspect had a history of using aliases and false identities then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which establishes that the suspect had no history of using aliases and false identities.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect had a history of using aliases and false identities then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The suspect had no history of using aliases and false identities
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The suspect had no history of using aliases and false identities, since if the suspect had a history of using aliases and false identities then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect had a history of using aliases and false identities then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The suspect had no history of using aliases and false identities
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The suspect had no history of using aliases and false identities, because if the suspect had a history of using aliases and false identities then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect had a history of using aliases and false identities then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The suspect had no history of using aliases and false identities
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The suspect had no history of using aliases and false identities, as if the suspect had a history of using aliases and false identities then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect had a history of using aliases and false identities then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The suspect had no history of using aliases and false identities
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a witness claimed to have seen the suspect arguing with the victim on the day of the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a witness claimed to have seen the suspect arguing with the victim on the day of the murder, therefore the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a witness claimed to have seen the suspect arguing with the victim on the day of the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A witness claimed to have seen the suspect arguing with the victim on the day of the murder
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a witness claimed to have seen the suspect arguing with the victim on the day of the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a witness claimed to have seen the suspect arguing with the victim on the day of the murder, hence the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a witness claimed to have seen the suspect arguing with the victim on the day of the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A witness claimed to have seen the suspect arguing with the victim on the day of the murder
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a witness claimed to have seen the suspect arguing with the victim on the day of the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a witness claimed to have seen the suspect arguing with the victim on the day of the murder, thus the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a witness claimed to have seen the suspect arguing with the victim on the day of the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A witness claimed to have seen the suspect arguing with the victim on the day of the murder
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a witness claimed to have seen the suspect arguing with the victim on the day of the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a witness claimed to have seen the suspect arguing with the victim on the day of the murder, so it can be concluded that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a witness claimed to have seen the suspect arguing with the victim on the day of the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A witness claimed to have seen the suspect arguing with the victim on the day of the murder
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a witness claimed to have seen the suspect arguing with the victim on the day of the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a witness claimed to have seen the suspect arguing with the victim on the day of the murder, so the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a witness claimed to have seen the suspect arguing with the victim on the day of the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A witness claimed to have seen the suspect arguing with the victim on the day of the murder
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a witness claimed to have seen the suspect arguing with the victim on the day of the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a witness claimed to have seen the suspect arguing with the victim on the day of the murder, which implies that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a witness claimed to have seen the suspect arguing with the victim on the day of the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A witness claimed to have seen the suspect arguing with the victim on the day of the murder
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a witness claimed to have seen the suspect arguing with the victim on the day of the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a witness claimed to have seen the suspect arguing with the victim on the day of the murder, which shows that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a witness claimed to have seen the suspect arguing with the victim on the day of the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A witness claimed to have seen the suspect arguing with the victim on the day of the murder
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.