<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street, and officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene, therefore the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
stringlengths 355
1.02k
|
|---|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim's will had been recently updated, naming the suspect as the sole beneficiary then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the victim's will had been recently updated, naming the suspect as the sole beneficiary, which implies that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's will had been recently updated, naming the suspect as the sole beneficiary then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The victim's will had been recently updated, naming the suspect as the sole beneficiary
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim's will had been recently updated, naming the suspect as the sole beneficiary then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the victim's will had been recently updated, naming the suspect as the sole beneficiary, which shows that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's will had been recently updated, naming the suspect as the sole beneficiary then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The victim's will had been recently updated, naming the suspect as the sole beneficiary
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim's will had been recently updated, naming the suspect as the sole beneficiary then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the victim's will had been recently updated, naming the suspect as the sole beneficiary, which establishes that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's will had been recently updated, naming the suspect as the sole beneficiary then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The victim's will had been recently updated, naming the suspect as the sole beneficiary
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, since if the victim's will had been recently updated, naming the suspect as the sole beneficiary then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the victim's will had been recently updated, naming the suspect as the sole beneficiary.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's will had been recently updated, naming the suspect as the sole beneficiary then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The victim's will had been recently updated, naming the suspect as the sole beneficiary
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, because if the victim's will had been recently updated, naming the suspect as the sole beneficiary then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the victim's will had been recently updated, naming the suspect as the sole beneficiary.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's will had been recently updated, naming the suspect as the sole beneficiary then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The victim's will had been recently updated, naming the suspect as the sole beneficiary
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, as if the victim's will had been recently updated, naming the suspect as the sole beneficiary then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the victim's will had been recently updated, naming the suspect as the sole beneficiary.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's will had been recently updated, naming the suspect as the sole beneficiary then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The victim's will had been recently updated, naming the suspect as the sole beneficiary
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim's will had been recently updated, naming the suspect as the sole beneficiary then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, therefore the victim's will had not been updated, naming the suspect as the sole beneficiary.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's will had been recently updated, naming the suspect as the sole beneficiary then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The victim's will had not been updated, naming the suspect as the sole beneficiary
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim's will had been recently updated, naming the suspect as the sole beneficiary then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, hence the victim's will had not been updated, naming the suspect as the sole beneficiary.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's will had been recently updated, naming the suspect as the sole beneficiary then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The victim's will had not been updated, naming the suspect as the sole beneficiary
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim's will had been recently updated, naming the suspect as the sole beneficiary then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, thus the victim's will had not been updated, naming the suspect as the sole beneficiary.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's will had been recently updated, naming the suspect as the sole beneficiary then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The victim's will had not been updated, naming the suspect as the sole beneficiary
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim's will had been recently updated, naming the suspect as the sole beneficiary then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, so it can be concluded that the victim's will had not been updated, naming the suspect as the sole beneficiary.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's will had been recently updated, naming the suspect as the sole beneficiary then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The victim's will had not been updated, naming the suspect as the sole beneficiary
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim's will had been recently updated, naming the suspect as the sole beneficiary then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, so the victim's will had not been updated, naming the suspect as the sole beneficiary.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's will had been recently updated, naming the suspect as the sole beneficiary then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The victim's will had not been updated, naming the suspect as the sole beneficiary
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim's will had been recently updated, naming the suspect as the sole beneficiary then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which implies that the victim's will had not been updated, naming the suspect as the sole beneficiary.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's will had been recently updated, naming the suspect as the sole beneficiary then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The victim's will had not been updated, naming the suspect as the sole beneficiary
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim's will had been recently updated, naming the suspect as the sole beneficiary then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which shows that the victim's will had not been updated, naming the suspect as the sole beneficiary.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's will had been recently updated, naming the suspect as the sole beneficiary then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The victim's will had not been updated, naming the suspect as the sole beneficiary
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim's will had been recently updated, naming the suspect as the sole beneficiary then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which establishes that the victim's will had not been updated, naming the suspect as the sole beneficiary.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's will had been recently updated, naming the suspect as the sole beneficiary then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The victim's will had not been updated, naming the suspect as the sole beneficiary
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The victim's will had not been updated, naming the suspect as the sole beneficiary, since if the victim's will had been recently updated, naming the suspect as the sole beneficiary then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's will had been recently updated, naming the suspect as the sole beneficiary then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The victim's will had not been updated, naming the suspect as the sole beneficiary
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The victim's will had not been updated, naming the suspect as the sole beneficiary, because if the victim's will had been recently updated, naming the suspect as the sole beneficiary then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's will had been recently updated, naming the suspect as the sole beneficiary then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The victim's will had not been updated, naming the suspect as the sole beneficiary
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The victim's will had not been updated, naming the suspect as the sole beneficiary, as if the victim's will had been recently updated, naming the suspect as the sole beneficiary then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's will had been recently updated, naming the suspect as the sole beneficiary then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The victim's will had not been updated, naming the suspect as the sole beneficiary
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a witness reported hearing the suspect threaten the victim in public then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a witness reported hearing the suspect threaten the victim in public, therefore the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a witness reported hearing the suspect threaten the victim in public then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A witness reported hearing the suspect threaten the victim in public
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a witness reported hearing the suspect threaten the victim in public then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a witness reported hearing the suspect threaten the victim in public, hence the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a witness reported hearing the suspect threaten the victim in public then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A witness reported hearing the suspect threaten the victim in public
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a witness reported hearing the suspect threaten the victim in public then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a witness reported hearing the suspect threaten the victim in public, thus the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a witness reported hearing the suspect threaten the victim in public then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A witness reported hearing the suspect threaten the victim in public
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a witness reported hearing the suspect threaten the victim in public then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a witness reported hearing the suspect threaten the victim in public, so it can be concluded that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a witness reported hearing the suspect threaten the victim in public then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A witness reported hearing the suspect threaten the victim in public
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a witness reported hearing the suspect threaten the victim in public then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a witness reported hearing the suspect threaten the victim in public, so the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a witness reported hearing the suspect threaten the victim in public then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A witness reported hearing the suspect threaten the victim in public
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a witness reported hearing the suspect threaten the victim in public then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a witness reported hearing the suspect threaten the victim in public, which implies that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a witness reported hearing the suspect threaten the victim in public then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A witness reported hearing the suspect threaten the victim in public
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a witness reported hearing the suspect threaten the victim in public then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a witness reported hearing the suspect threaten the victim in public, which shows that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a witness reported hearing the suspect threaten the victim in public then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A witness reported hearing the suspect threaten the victim in public
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a witness reported hearing the suspect threaten the victim in public then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a witness reported hearing the suspect threaten the victim in public, which establishes that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a witness reported hearing the suspect threaten the victim in public then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A witness reported hearing the suspect threaten the victim in public
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, since if a witness reported hearing the suspect threaten the victim in public then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and a witness reported hearing the suspect threaten the victim in public.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a witness reported hearing the suspect threaten the victim in public then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A witness reported hearing the suspect threaten the victim in public
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, because if a witness reported hearing the suspect threaten the victim in public then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and a witness reported hearing the suspect threaten the victim in public.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a witness reported hearing the suspect threaten the victim in public then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A witness reported hearing the suspect threaten the victim in public
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, as if a witness reported hearing the suspect threaten the victim in public then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and a witness reported hearing the suspect threaten the victim in public.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a witness reported hearing the suspect threaten the victim in public then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A witness reported hearing the suspect threaten the victim in public
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a witness reported hearing the suspect threaten the victim in public then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, therefore no witness reported hearing the suspect threaten the victim in public.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a witness reported hearing the suspect threaten the victim in public then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: No witness reported hearing the suspect threaten the victim in public
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a witness reported hearing the suspect threaten the victim in public then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, hence no witness reported hearing the suspect threaten the victim in public.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a witness reported hearing the suspect threaten the victim in public then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: No witness reported hearing the suspect threaten the victim in public
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a witness reported hearing the suspect threaten the victim in public then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, thus no witness reported hearing the suspect threaten the victim in public.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a witness reported hearing the suspect threaten the victim in public then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: No witness reported hearing the suspect threaten the victim in public
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a witness reported hearing the suspect threaten the victim in public then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, so it can be concluded that no witness reported hearing the suspect threaten the victim in public.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a witness reported hearing the suspect threaten the victim in public then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: No witness reported hearing the suspect threaten the victim in public
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a witness reported hearing the suspect threaten the victim in public then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, so no witness reported hearing the suspect threaten the victim in public.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a witness reported hearing the suspect threaten the victim in public then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: No witness reported hearing the suspect threaten the victim in public
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a witness reported hearing the suspect threaten the victim in public then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which implies that no witness reported hearing the suspect threaten the victim in public.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a witness reported hearing the suspect threaten the victim in public then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: No witness reported hearing the suspect threaten the victim in public
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a witness reported hearing the suspect threaten the victim in public then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which shows that no witness reported hearing the suspect threaten the victim in public.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a witness reported hearing the suspect threaten the victim in public then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: No witness reported hearing the suspect threaten the victim in public
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a witness reported hearing the suspect threaten the victim in public then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which establishes that no witness reported hearing the suspect threaten the victim in public.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a witness reported hearing the suspect threaten the victim in public then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: No witness reported hearing the suspect threaten the victim in public
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```No witness reported hearing the suspect threaten the victim in public, since if a witness reported hearing the suspect threaten the victim in public then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a witness reported hearing the suspect threaten the victim in public then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: No witness reported hearing the suspect threaten the victim in public
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```No witness reported hearing the suspect threaten the victim in public, because if a witness reported hearing the suspect threaten the victim in public then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a witness reported hearing the suspect threaten the victim in public then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: No witness reported hearing the suspect threaten the victim in public
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```No witness reported hearing the suspect threaten the victim in public, as if a witness reported hearing the suspect threaten the victim in public then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a witness reported hearing the suspect threaten the victim in public then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: No witness reported hearing the suspect threaten the victim in public
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the suspect's fingerprints were found on the victim's car door handle then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the suspect's fingerprints were found on the victim's car door handle, therefore the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect's fingerprints were found on the victim's car door handle then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The suspect's fingerprints were found on the victim's car door handle
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the suspect's fingerprints were found on the victim's car door handle then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the suspect's fingerprints were found on the victim's car door handle, hence the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect's fingerprints were found on the victim's car door handle then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The suspect's fingerprints were found on the victim's car door handle
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the suspect's fingerprints were found on the victim's car door handle then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the suspect's fingerprints were found on the victim's car door handle, thus the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect's fingerprints were found on the victim's car door handle then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The suspect's fingerprints were found on the victim's car door handle
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the suspect's fingerprints were found on the victim's car door handle then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the suspect's fingerprints were found on the victim's car door handle, so it can be concluded that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect's fingerprints were found on the victim's car door handle then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The suspect's fingerprints were found on the victim's car door handle
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the suspect's fingerprints were found on the victim's car door handle then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the suspect's fingerprints were found on the victim's car door handle, so the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect's fingerprints were found on the victim's car door handle then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The suspect's fingerprints were found on the victim's car door handle
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the suspect's fingerprints were found on the victim's car door handle then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the suspect's fingerprints were found on the victim's car door handle, which implies that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect's fingerprints were found on the victim's car door handle then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The suspect's fingerprints were found on the victim's car door handle
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the suspect's fingerprints were found on the victim's car door handle then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the suspect's fingerprints were found on the victim's car door handle, which shows that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect's fingerprints were found on the victim's car door handle then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The suspect's fingerprints were found on the victim's car door handle
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the suspect's fingerprints were found on the victim's car door handle then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the suspect's fingerprints were found on the victim's car door handle, which establishes that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect's fingerprints were found on the victim's car door handle then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The suspect's fingerprints were found on the victim's car door handle
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, since if the suspect's fingerprints were found on the victim's car door handle then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the suspect's fingerprints were found on the victim's car door handle.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect's fingerprints were found on the victim's car door handle then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The suspect's fingerprints were found on the victim's car door handle
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, because if the suspect's fingerprints were found on the victim's car door handle then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the suspect's fingerprints were found on the victim's car door handle.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect's fingerprints were found on the victim's car door handle then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The suspect's fingerprints were found on the victim's car door handle
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, as if the suspect's fingerprints were found on the victim's car door handle then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the suspect's fingerprints were found on the victim's car door handle.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect's fingerprints were found on the victim's car door handle then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The suspect's fingerprints were found on the victim's car door handle
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the suspect's fingerprints were found on the victim's car door handle then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, therefore the suspect's fingerprints were not found on the victim's car door handle.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect's fingerprints were found on the victim's car door handle then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The suspect's fingerprints were not found on the victim's car door handle
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the suspect's fingerprints were found on the victim's car door handle then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, hence the suspect's fingerprints were not found on the victim's car door handle.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect's fingerprints were found on the victim's car door handle then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The suspect's fingerprints were not found on the victim's car door handle
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the suspect's fingerprints were found on the victim's car door handle then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, thus the suspect's fingerprints were not found on the victim's car door handle.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect's fingerprints were found on the victim's car door handle then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The suspect's fingerprints were not found on the victim's car door handle
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the suspect's fingerprints were found on the victim's car door handle then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, so it can be concluded that the suspect's fingerprints were not found on the victim's car door handle.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect's fingerprints were found on the victim's car door handle then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The suspect's fingerprints were not found on the victim's car door handle
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the suspect's fingerprints were found on the victim's car door handle then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, so the suspect's fingerprints were not found on the victim's car door handle.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect's fingerprints were found on the victim's car door handle then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The suspect's fingerprints were not found on the victim's car door handle
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the suspect's fingerprints were found on the victim's car door handle then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which implies that the suspect's fingerprints were not found on the victim's car door handle.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect's fingerprints were found on the victim's car door handle then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The suspect's fingerprints were not found on the victim's car door handle
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the suspect's fingerprints were found on the victim's car door handle then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which shows that the suspect's fingerprints were not found on the victim's car door handle.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect's fingerprints were found on the victim's car door handle then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The suspect's fingerprints were not found on the victim's car door handle
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the suspect's fingerprints were found on the victim's car door handle then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which establishes that the suspect's fingerprints were not found on the victim's car door handle.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect's fingerprints were found on the victim's car door handle then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The suspect's fingerprints were not found on the victim's car door handle
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The suspect's fingerprints were not found on the victim's car door handle, since if the suspect's fingerprints were found on the victim's car door handle then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect's fingerprints were found on the victim's car door handle then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The suspect's fingerprints were not found on the victim's car door handle
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The suspect's fingerprints were not found on the victim's car door handle, because if the suspect's fingerprints were found on the victim's car door handle then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect's fingerprints were found on the victim's car door handle then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The suspect's fingerprints were not found on the victim's car door handle
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The suspect's fingerprints were not found on the victim's car door handle, as if the suspect's fingerprints were found on the victim's car door handle then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect's fingerprints were found on the victim's car door handle then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The suspect's fingerprints were not found on the victim's car door handle
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a hidden camera captured the suspect disposing of evidence in a dumpster then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a hidden camera captured the suspect disposing of evidence in a dumpster, therefore the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a hidden camera captured the suspect disposing of evidence in a dumpster then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A hidden camera captured the suspect disposing of evidence in a dumpster
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a hidden camera captured the suspect disposing of evidence in a dumpster then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a hidden camera captured the suspect disposing of evidence in a dumpster, hence the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a hidden camera captured the suspect disposing of evidence in a dumpster then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A hidden camera captured the suspect disposing of evidence in a dumpster
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a hidden camera captured the suspect disposing of evidence in a dumpster then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a hidden camera captured the suspect disposing of evidence in a dumpster, thus the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a hidden camera captured the suspect disposing of evidence in a dumpster then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A hidden camera captured the suspect disposing of evidence in a dumpster
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a hidden camera captured the suspect disposing of evidence in a dumpster then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a hidden camera captured the suspect disposing of evidence in a dumpster, so it can be concluded that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a hidden camera captured the suspect disposing of evidence in a dumpster then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A hidden camera captured the suspect disposing of evidence in a dumpster
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a hidden camera captured the suspect disposing of evidence in a dumpster then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a hidden camera captured the suspect disposing of evidence in a dumpster, so the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a hidden camera captured the suspect disposing of evidence in a dumpster then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A hidden camera captured the suspect disposing of evidence in a dumpster
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a hidden camera captured the suspect disposing of evidence in a dumpster then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a hidden camera captured the suspect disposing of evidence in a dumpster, which implies that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a hidden camera captured the suspect disposing of evidence in a dumpster then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A hidden camera captured the suspect disposing of evidence in a dumpster
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a hidden camera captured the suspect disposing of evidence in a dumpster then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a hidden camera captured the suspect disposing of evidence in a dumpster, which shows that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a hidden camera captured the suspect disposing of evidence in a dumpster then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A hidden camera captured the suspect disposing of evidence in a dumpster
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a hidden camera captured the suspect disposing of evidence in a dumpster then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a hidden camera captured the suspect disposing of evidence in a dumpster, which establishes that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a hidden camera captured the suspect disposing of evidence in a dumpster then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A hidden camera captured the suspect disposing of evidence in a dumpster
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, since if a hidden camera captured the suspect disposing of evidence in a dumpster then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and a hidden camera captured the suspect disposing of evidence in a dumpster.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a hidden camera captured the suspect disposing of evidence in a dumpster then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A hidden camera captured the suspect disposing of evidence in a dumpster
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, because if a hidden camera captured the suspect disposing of evidence in a dumpster then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and a hidden camera captured the suspect disposing of evidence in a dumpster.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a hidden camera captured the suspect disposing of evidence in a dumpster then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A hidden camera captured the suspect disposing of evidence in a dumpster
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, as if a hidden camera captured the suspect disposing of evidence in a dumpster then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and a hidden camera captured the suspect disposing of evidence in a dumpster.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a hidden camera captured the suspect disposing of evidence in a dumpster then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A hidden camera captured the suspect disposing of evidence in a dumpster
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a hidden camera captured the suspect disposing of evidence in a dumpster then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, therefore no hidden camera captured the suspect disposing of evidence in a dumpster.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a hidden camera captured the suspect disposing of evidence in a dumpster then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: No hidden camera captured the suspect disposing of evidence in a dumpster
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a hidden camera captured the suspect disposing of evidence in a dumpster then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, hence no hidden camera captured the suspect disposing of evidence in a dumpster.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a hidden camera captured the suspect disposing of evidence in a dumpster then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: No hidden camera captured the suspect disposing of evidence in a dumpster
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a hidden camera captured the suspect disposing of evidence in a dumpster then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, thus no hidden camera captured the suspect disposing of evidence in a dumpster.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a hidden camera captured the suspect disposing of evidence in a dumpster then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: No hidden camera captured the suspect disposing of evidence in a dumpster
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a hidden camera captured the suspect disposing of evidence in a dumpster then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, so it can be concluded that no hidden camera captured the suspect disposing of evidence in a dumpster.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a hidden camera captured the suspect disposing of evidence in a dumpster then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: No hidden camera captured the suspect disposing of evidence in a dumpster
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a hidden camera captured the suspect disposing of evidence in a dumpster then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, so no hidden camera captured the suspect disposing of evidence in a dumpster.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a hidden camera captured the suspect disposing of evidence in a dumpster then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: No hidden camera captured the suspect disposing of evidence in a dumpster
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a hidden camera captured the suspect disposing of evidence in a dumpster then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which implies that no hidden camera captured the suspect disposing of evidence in a dumpster.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a hidden camera captured the suspect disposing of evidence in a dumpster then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: No hidden camera captured the suspect disposing of evidence in a dumpster
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a hidden camera captured the suspect disposing of evidence in a dumpster then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which shows that no hidden camera captured the suspect disposing of evidence in a dumpster.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a hidden camera captured the suspect disposing of evidence in a dumpster then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: No hidden camera captured the suspect disposing of evidence in a dumpster
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a hidden camera captured the suspect disposing of evidence in a dumpster then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which establishes that no hidden camera captured the suspect disposing of evidence in a dumpster.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a hidden camera captured the suspect disposing of evidence in a dumpster then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: No hidden camera captured the suspect disposing of evidence in a dumpster
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```No hidden camera captured the suspect disposing of evidence in a dumpster, since if a hidden camera captured the suspect disposing of evidence in a dumpster then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a hidden camera captured the suspect disposing of evidence in a dumpster then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: No hidden camera captured the suspect disposing of evidence in a dumpster
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```No hidden camera captured the suspect disposing of evidence in a dumpster, because if a hidden camera captured the suspect disposing of evidence in a dumpster then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a hidden camera captured the suspect disposing of evidence in a dumpster then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: No hidden camera captured the suspect disposing of evidence in a dumpster
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```No hidden camera captured the suspect disposing of evidence in a dumpster, as if a hidden camera captured the suspect disposing of evidence in a dumpster then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a hidden camera captured the suspect disposing of evidence in a dumpster then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: No hidden camera captured the suspect disposing of evidence in a dumpster
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim's computer had been wiped clean of all data then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the victim's computer had been wiped clean of all data, therefore the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's computer had been wiped clean of all data then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The victim's computer had been wiped clean of all data
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim's computer had been wiped clean of all data then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the victim's computer had been wiped clean of all data, hence the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's computer had been wiped clean of all data then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The victim's computer had been wiped clean of all data
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim's computer had been wiped clean of all data then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the victim's computer had been wiped clean of all data, thus the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's computer had been wiped clean of all data then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The victim's computer had been wiped clean of all data
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim's computer had been wiped clean of all data then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the victim's computer had been wiped clean of all data, so it can be concluded that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's computer had been wiped clean of all data then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The victim's computer had been wiped clean of all data
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim's computer had been wiped clean of all data then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the victim's computer had been wiped clean of all data, so the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's computer had been wiped clean of all data then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The victim's computer had been wiped clean of all data
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim's computer had been wiped clean of all data then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the victim's computer had been wiped clean of all data, which implies that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's computer had been wiped clean of all data then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The victim's computer had been wiped clean of all data
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim's computer had been wiped clean of all data then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the victim's computer had been wiped clean of all data, which shows that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's computer had been wiped clean of all data then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The victim's computer had been wiped clean of all data
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim's computer had been wiped clean of all data then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the victim's computer had been wiped clean of all data, which establishes that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's computer had been wiped clean of all data then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The victim's computer had been wiped clean of all data
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, since if the victim's computer had been wiped clean of all data then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the victim's computer had been wiped clean of all data.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's computer had been wiped clean of all data then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The victim's computer had been wiped clean of all data
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, because if the victim's computer had been wiped clean of all data then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the victim's computer had been wiped clean of all data.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's computer had been wiped clean of all data then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The victim's computer had been wiped clean of all data
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, as if the victim's computer had been wiped clean of all data then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the victim's computer had been wiped clean of all data.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's computer had been wiped clean of all data then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The victim's computer had been wiped clean of all data
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim's computer had been wiped clean of all data then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, therefore the victim's computer had not been wiped clean of all data.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's computer had been wiped clean of all data then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The victim's computer had not been wiped clean of all data
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim's computer had been wiped clean of all data then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, hence the victim's computer had not been wiped clean of all data.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's computer had been wiped clean of all data then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The victim's computer had not been wiped clean of all data
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim's computer had been wiped clean of all data then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, thus the victim's computer had not been wiped clean of all data.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's computer had been wiped clean of all data then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The victim's computer had not been wiped clean of all data
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim's computer had been wiped clean of all data then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, so it can be concluded that the victim's computer had not been wiped clean of all data.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's computer had been wiped clean of all data then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The victim's computer had not been wiped clean of all data
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim's computer had been wiped clean of all data then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, so the victim's computer had not been wiped clean of all data.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's computer had been wiped clean of all data then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The victim's computer had not been wiped clean of all data
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim's computer had been wiped clean of all data then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which implies that the victim's computer had not been wiped clean of all data.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's computer had been wiped clean of all data then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The victim's computer had not been wiped clean of all data
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.