<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street, and officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene, therefore the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
stringlengths 355
1.02k
|
|---|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a witness claimed to have seen the suspect arguing with the victim on the day of the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a witness claimed to have seen the suspect arguing with the victim on the day of the murder, which establishes that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a witness claimed to have seen the suspect arguing with the victim on the day of the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A witness claimed to have seen the suspect arguing with the victim on the day of the murder
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, since if a witness claimed to have seen the suspect arguing with the victim on the day of the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and a witness claimed to have seen the suspect arguing with the victim on the day of the murder.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a witness claimed to have seen the suspect arguing with the victim on the day of the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A witness claimed to have seen the suspect arguing with the victim on the day of the murder
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, because if a witness claimed to have seen the suspect arguing with the victim on the day of the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and a witness claimed to have seen the suspect arguing with the victim on the day of the murder.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a witness claimed to have seen the suspect arguing with the victim on the day of the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A witness claimed to have seen the suspect arguing with the victim on the day of the murder
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, as if a witness claimed to have seen the suspect arguing with the victim on the day of the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and a witness claimed to have seen the suspect arguing with the victim on the day of the murder.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a witness claimed to have seen the suspect arguing with the victim on the day of the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A witness claimed to have seen the suspect arguing with the victim on the day of the murder
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a witness claimed to have seen the suspect arguing with the victim on the day of the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, therefore no witness claimed to have seen the suspect arguing with the victim on the day of the murder.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a witness claimed to have seen the suspect arguing with the victim on the day of the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: No witness claimed to have seen the suspect arguing with the victim on the day of the murder
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a witness claimed to have seen the suspect arguing with the victim on the day of the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, hence no witness claimed to have seen the suspect arguing with the victim on the day of the murder.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a witness claimed to have seen the suspect arguing with the victim on the day of the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: No witness claimed to have seen the suspect arguing with the victim on the day of the murder
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a witness claimed to have seen the suspect arguing with the victim on the day of the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, thus no witness claimed to have seen the suspect arguing with the victim on the day of the murder.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a witness claimed to have seen the suspect arguing with the victim on the day of the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: No witness claimed to have seen the suspect arguing with the victim on the day of the murder
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a witness claimed to have seen the suspect arguing with the victim on the day of the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, so it can be concluded that no witness claimed to have seen the suspect arguing with the victim on the day of the murder.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a witness claimed to have seen the suspect arguing with the victim on the day of the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: No witness claimed to have seen the suspect arguing with the victim on the day of the murder
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a witness claimed to have seen the suspect arguing with the victim on the day of the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, so no witness claimed to have seen the suspect arguing with the victim on the day of the murder.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a witness claimed to have seen the suspect arguing with the victim on the day of the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: No witness claimed to have seen the suspect arguing with the victim on the day of the murder
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a witness claimed to have seen the suspect arguing with the victim on the day of the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which implies that no witness claimed to have seen the suspect arguing with the victim on the day of the murder.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a witness claimed to have seen the suspect arguing with the victim on the day of the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: No witness claimed to have seen the suspect arguing with the victim on the day of the murder
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a witness claimed to have seen the suspect arguing with the victim on the day of the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which shows that no witness claimed to have seen the suspect arguing with the victim on the day of the murder.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a witness claimed to have seen the suspect arguing with the victim on the day of the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: No witness claimed to have seen the suspect arguing with the victim on the day of the murder
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a witness claimed to have seen the suspect arguing with the victim on the day of the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which establishes that no witness claimed to have seen the suspect arguing with the victim on the day of the murder.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a witness claimed to have seen the suspect arguing with the victim on the day of the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: No witness claimed to have seen the suspect arguing with the victim on the day of the murder
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```No witness claimed to have seen the suspect arguing with the victim on the day of the murder, since if a witness claimed to have seen the suspect arguing with the victim on the day of the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a witness claimed to have seen the suspect arguing with the victim on the day of the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: No witness claimed to have seen the suspect arguing with the victim on the day of the murder
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```No witness claimed to have seen the suspect arguing with the victim on the day of the murder, because if a witness claimed to have seen the suspect arguing with the victim on the day of the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a witness claimed to have seen the suspect arguing with the victim on the day of the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: No witness claimed to have seen the suspect arguing with the victim on the day of the murder
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```No witness claimed to have seen the suspect arguing with the victim on the day of the murder, as if a witness claimed to have seen the suspect arguing with the victim on the day of the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a witness claimed to have seen the suspect arguing with the victim on the day of the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: No witness claimed to have seen the suspect arguing with the victim on the day of the murder
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim's security system recorded the suspect entering their home then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the victim's security system recorded the suspect entering their home, therefore the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's security system recorded the suspect entering their home then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The victim's security system recorded the suspect entering their home
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim's security system recorded the suspect entering their home then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the victim's security system recorded the suspect entering their home, hence the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's security system recorded the suspect entering their home then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The victim's security system recorded the suspect entering their home
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim's security system recorded the suspect entering their home then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the victim's security system recorded the suspect entering their home, thus the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's security system recorded the suspect entering their home then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The victim's security system recorded the suspect entering their home
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim's security system recorded the suspect entering their home then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the victim's security system recorded the suspect entering their home, so it can be concluded that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's security system recorded the suspect entering their home then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The victim's security system recorded the suspect entering their home
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim's security system recorded the suspect entering their home then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the victim's security system recorded the suspect entering their home, so the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's security system recorded the suspect entering their home then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The victim's security system recorded the suspect entering their home
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim's security system recorded the suspect entering their home then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the victim's security system recorded the suspect entering their home, which implies that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's security system recorded the suspect entering their home then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The victim's security system recorded the suspect entering their home
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim's security system recorded the suspect entering their home then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the victim's security system recorded the suspect entering their home, which shows that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's security system recorded the suspect entering their home then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The victim's security system recorded the suspect entering their home
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim's security system recorded the suspect entering their home then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the victim's security system recorded the suspect entering their home, which establishes that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's security system recorded the suspect entering their home then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The victim's security system recorded the suspect entering their home
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, since if the victim's security system recorded the suspect entering their home then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the victim's security system recorded the suspect entering their home.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's security system recorded the suspect entering their home then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The victim's security system recorded the suspect entering their home
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, because if the victim's security system recorded the suspect entering their home then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the victim's security system recorded the suspect entering their home.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's security system recorded the suspect entering their home then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The victim's security system recorded the suspect entering their home
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, as if the victim's security system recorded the suspect entering their home then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the victim's security system recorded the suspect entering their home.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's security system recorded the suspect entering their home then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The victim's security system recorded the suspect entering their home
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim's security system recorded the suspect entering their home then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, therefore the victim's security system did not record the suspect entering their home.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's security system recorded the suspect entering their home then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The victim's security system did not record the suspect entering their home
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim's security system recorded the suspect entering their home then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, hence the victim's security system did not record the suspect entering their home.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's security system recorded the suspect entering their home then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The victim's security system did not record the suspect entering their home
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim's security system recorded the suspect entering their home then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, thus the victim's security system did not record the suspect entering their home.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's security system recorded the suspect entering their home then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The victim's security system did not record the suspect entering their home
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim's security system recorded the suspect entering their home then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, so it can be concluded that the victim's security system did not record the suspect entering their home.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's security system recorded the suspect entering their home then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The victim's security system did not record the suspect entering their home
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim's security system recorded the suspect entering their home then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, so the victim's security system did not record the suspect entering their home.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's security system recorded the suspect entering their home then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The victim's security system did not record the suspect entering their home
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim's security system recorded the suspect entering their home then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which implies that the victim's security system did not record the suspect entering their home.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's security system recorded the suspect entering their home then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The victim's security system did not record the suspect entering their home
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim's security system recorded the suspect entering their home then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which shows that the victim's security system did not record the suspect entering their home.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's security system recorded the suspect entering their home then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The victim's security system did not record the suspect entering their home
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim's security system recorded the suspect entering their home then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which establishes that the victim's security system did not record the suspect entering their home.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's security system recorded the suspect entering their home then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The victim's security system did not record the suspect entering their home
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The victim's security system did not record the suspect entering their home, since if the victim's security system recorded the suspect entering their home then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's security system recorded the suspect entering their home then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The victim's security system did not record the suspect entering their home
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The victim's security system did not record the suspect entering their home, because if the victim's security system recorded the suspect entering their home then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's security system recorded the suspect entering their home then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The victim's security system did not record the suspect entering their home
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The victim's security system did not record the suspect entering their home, as if the victim's security system recorded the suspect entering their home then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's security system recorded the suspect entering their home then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The victim's security system did not record the suspect entering their home
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a forensic expert found traces of the victim's blood in the suspect's car then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a forensic expert found traces of the victim's blood in the suspect's car, therefore the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a forensic expert found traces of the victim's blood in the suspect's car then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A forensic expert found traces of the victim's blood in the suspect's car
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a forensic expert found traces of the victim's blood in the suspect's car then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a forensic expert found traces of the victim's blood in the suspect's car, hence the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a forensic expert found traces of the victim's blood in the suspect's car then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A forensic expert found traces of the victim's blood in the suspect's car
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a forensic expert found traces of the victim's blood in the suspect's car then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a forensic expert found traces of the victim's blood in the suspect's car, thus the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a forensic expert found traces of the victim's blood in the suspect's car then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A forensic expert found traces of the victim's blood in the suspect's car
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a forensic expert found traces of the victim's blood in the suspect's car then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a forensic expert found traces of the victim's blood in the suspect's car, so it can be concluded that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a forensic expert found traces of the victim's blood in the suspect's car then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A forensic expert found traces of the victim's blood in the suspect's car
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a forensic expert found traces of the victim's blood in the suspect's car then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a forensic expert found traces of the victim's blood in the suspect's car, so the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a forensic expert found traces of the victim's blood in the suspect's car then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A forensic expert found traces of the victim's blood in the suspect's car
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a forensic expert found traces of the victim's blood in the suspect's car then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a forensic expert found traces of the victim's blood in the suspect's car, which implies that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a forensic expert found traces of the victim's blood in the suspect's car then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A forensic expert found traces of the victim's blood in the suspect's car
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a forensic expert found traces of the victim's blood in the suspect's car then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a forensic expert found traces of the victim's blood in the suspect's car, which shows that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a forensic expert found traces of the victim's blood in the suspect's car then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A forensic expert found traces of the victim's blood in the suspect's car
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a forensic expert found traces of the victim's blood in the suspect's car then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a forensic expert found traces of the victim's blood in the suspect's car, which establishes that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a forensic expert found traces of the victim's blood in the suspect's car then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A forensic expert found traces of the victim's blood in the suspect's car
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, since if a forensic expert found traces of the victim's blood in the suspect's car then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and a forensic expert found traces of the victim's blood in the suspect's car.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a forensic expert found traces of the victim's blood in the suspect's car then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A forensic expert found traces of the victim's blood in the suspect's car
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, because if a forensic expert found traces of the victim's blood in the suspect's car then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and a forensic expert found traces of the victim's blood in the suspect's car.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a forensic expert found traces of the victim's blood in the suspect's car then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A forensic expert found traces of the victim's blood in the suspect's car
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, as if a forensic expert found traces of the victim's blood in the suspect's car then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and a forensic expert found traces of the victim's blood in the suspect's car.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a forensic expert found traces of the victim's blood in the suspect's car then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A forensic expert found traces of the victim's blood in the suspect's car
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a forensic expert found traces of the victim's blood in the suspect's car then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, therefore a forensic expert did not find traces of the victim's blood in the suspect's car.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a forensic expert found traces of the victim's blood in the suspect's car then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: A forensic expert did not find traces of the victim's blood in the suspect's car
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a forensic expert found traces of the victim's blood in the suspect's car then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, hence a forensic expert did not find traces of the victim's blood in the suspect's car.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a forensic expert found traces of the victim's blood in the suspect's car then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: A forensic expert did not find traces of the victim's blood in the suspect's car
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a forensic expert found traces of the victim's blood in the suspect's car then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, thus a forensic expert did not find traces of the victim's blood in the suspect's car.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a forensic expert found traces of the victim's blood in the suspect's car then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: A forensic expert did not find traces of the victim's blood in the suspect's car
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a forensic expert found traces of the victim's blood in the suspect's car then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, so it can be concluded that a forensic expert did not find traces of the victim's blood in the suspect's car.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a forensic expert found traces of the victim's blood in the suspect's car then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: A forensic expert did not find traces of the victim's blood in the suspect's car
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a forensic expert found traces of the victim's blood in the suspect's car then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, so a forensic expert did not find traces of the victim's blood in the suspect's car.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a forensic expert found traces of the victim's blood in the suspect's car then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: A forensic expert did not find traces of the victim's blood in the suspect's car
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a forensic expert found traces of the victim's blood in the suspect's car then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which implies that a forensic expert did not find traces of the victim's blood in the suspect's car.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a forensic expert found traces of the victim's blood in the suspect's car then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: A forensic expert did not find traces of the victim's blood in the suspect's car
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a forensic expert found traces of the victim's blood in the suspect's car then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which shows that a forensic expert did not find traces of the victim's blood in the suspect's car.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a forensic expert found traces of the victim's blood in the suspect's car then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: A forensic expert did not find traces of the victim's blood in the suspect's car
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a forensic expert found traces of the victim's blood in the suspect's car then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which establishes that a forensic expert did not find traces of the victim's blood in the suspect's car.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a forensic expert found traces of the victim's blood in the suspect's car then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: A forensic expert did not find traces of the victim's blood in the suspect's car
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```A forensic expert did not find traces of the victim's blood in the suspect's car, since if a forensic expert found traces of the victim's blood in the suspect's car then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a forensic expert found traces of the victim's blood in the suspect's car then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: A forensic expert did not find traces of the victim's blood in the suspect's car
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```A forensic expert did not find traces of the victim's blood in the suspect's car, because if a forensic expert found traces of the victim's blood in the suspect's car then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a forensic expert found traces of the victim's blood in the suspect's car then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: A forensic expert did not find traces of the victim's blood in the suspect's car
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```A forensic expert did not find traces of the victim's blood in the suspect's car, as if a forensic expert found traces of the victim's blood in the suspect's car then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a forensic expert found traces of the victim's blood in the suspect's car then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: A forensic expert did not find traces of the victim's blood in the suspect's car
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the suspect's social media posts hinted at a grudge against the victim then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the suspect's social media posts hinted at a grudge against the victim, therefore the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect's social media posts hinted at a grudge against the victim then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The suspect's social media posts hinted at a grudge against the victim
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the suspect's social media posts hinted at a grudge against the victim then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the suspect's social media posts hinted at a grudge against the victim, hence the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect's social media posts hinted at a grudge against the victim then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The suspect's social media posts hinted at a grudge against the victim
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the suspect's social media posts hinted at a grudge against the victim then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the suspect's social media posts hinted at a grudge against the victim, thus the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect's social media posts hinted at a grudge against the victim then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The suspect's social media posts hinted at a grudge against the victim
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the suspect's social media posts hinted at a grudge against the victim then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the suspect's social media posts hinted at a grudge against the victim, so it can be concluded that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect's social media posts hinted at a grudge against the victim then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The suspect's social media posts hinted at a grudge against the victim
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the suspect's social media posts hinted at a grudge against the victim then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the suspect's social media posts hinted at a grudge against the victim, so the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect's social media posts hinted at a grudge against the victim then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The suspect's social media posts hinted at a grudge against the victim
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the suspect's social media posts hinted at a grudge against the victim then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the suspect's social media posts hinted at a grudge against the victim, which implies that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect's social media posts hinted at a grudge against the victim then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The suspect's social media posts hinted at a grudge against the victim
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the suspect's social media posts hinted at a grudge against the victim then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the suspect's social media posts hinted at a grudge against the victim, which shows that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect's social media posts hinted at a grudge against the victim then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The suspect's social media posts hinted at a grudge against the victim
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the suspect's social media posts hinted at a grudge against the victim then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the suspect's social media posts hinted at a grudge against the victim, which establishes that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect's social media posts hinted at a grudge against the victim then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The suspect's social media posts hinted at a grudge against the victim
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, since if the suspect's social media posts hinted at a grudge against the victim then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the suspect's social media posts hinted at a grudge against the victim.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect's social media posts hinted at a grudge against the victim then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The suspect's social media posts hinted at a grudge against the victim
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, because if the suspect's social media posts hinted at a grudge against the victim then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the suspect's social media posts hinted at a grudge against the victim.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect's social media posts hinted at a grudge against the victim then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The suspect's social media posts hinted at a grudge against the victim
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, as if the suspect's social media posts hinted at a grudge against the victim then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the suspect's social media posts hinted at a grudge against the victim.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect's social media posts hinted at a grudge against the victim then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The suspect's social media posts hinted at a grudge against the victim
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the suspect's social media posts hinted at a grudge against the victim then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, therefore the suspect's social media posts did not hint at a grudge against the victim.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect's social media posts hinted at a grudge against the victim then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The suspect's social media posts did not hint at a grudge against the victim
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the suspect's social media posts hinted at a grudge against the victim then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, hence the suspect's social media posts did not hint at a grudge against the victim.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect's social media posts hinted at a grudge against the victim then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The suspect's social media posts did not hint at a grudge against the victim
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the suspect's social media posts hinted at a grudge against the victim then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, thus the suspect's social media posts did not hint at a grudge against the victim.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect's social media posts hinted at a grudge against the victim then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The suspect's social media posts did not hint at a grudge against the victim
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the suspect's social media posts hinted at a grudge against the victim then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, so it can be concluded that the suspect's social media posts did not hint at a grudge against the victim.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect's social media posts hinted at a grudge against the victim then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The suspect's social media posts did not hint at a grudge against the victim
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the suspect's social media posts hinted at a grudge against the victim then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, so the suspect's social media posts did not hint at a grudge against the victim.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect's social media posts hinted at a grudge against the victim then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The suspect's social media posts did not hint at a grudge against the victim
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the suspect's social media posts hinted at a grudge against the victim then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which implies that the suspect's social media posts did not hint at a grudge against the victim.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect's social media posts hinted at a grudge against the victim then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The suspect's social media posts did not hint at a grudge against the victim
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the suspect's social media posts hinted at a grudge against the victim then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which shows that the suspect's social media posts did not hint at a grudge against the victim.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect's social media posts hinted at a grudge against the victim then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The suspect's social media posts did not hint at a grudge against the victim
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the suspect's social media posts hinted at a grudge against the victim then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which establishes that the suspect's social media posts did not hint at a grudge against the victim.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect's social media posts hinted at a grudge against the victim then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The suspect's social media posts did not hint at a grudge against the victim
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The suspect's social media posts did not hint at a grudge against the victim, since if the suspect's social media posts hinted at a grudge against the victim then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect's social media posts hinted at a grudge against the victim then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The suspect's social media posts did not hint at a grudge against the victim
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The suspect's social media posts did not hint at a grudge against the victim, because if the suspect's social media posts hinted at a grudge against the victim then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect's social media posts hinted at a grudge against the victim then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The suspect's social media posts did not hint at a grudge against the victim
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The suspect's social media posts did not hint at a grudge against the victim, as if the suspect's social media posts hinted at a grudge against the victim then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect's social media posts hinted at a grudge against the victim then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The suspect's social media posts did not hint at a grudge against the victim
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim had recently received threatening letters in the mail then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the victim had recently received threatening letters in the mail, therefore the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim had recently received threatening letters in the mail then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The victim had recently received threatening letters in the mail
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim had recently received threatening letters in the mail then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the victim had recently received threatening letters in the mail, hence the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim had recently received threatening letters in the mail then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The victim had recently received threatening letters in the mail
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim had recently received threatening letters in the mail then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the victim had recently received threatening letters in the mail, thus the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim had recently received threatening letters in the mail then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The victim had recently received threatening letters in the mail
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim had recently received threatening letters in the mail then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the victim had recently received threatening letters in the mail, so it can be concluded that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim had recently received threatening letters in the mail then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The victim had recently received threatening letters in the mail
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim had recently received threatening letters in the mail then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the victim had recently received threatening letters in the mail, so the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim had recently received threatening letters in the mail then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The victim had recently received threatening letters in the mail
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim had recently received threatening letters in the mail then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the victim had recently received threatening letters in the mail, which implies that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim had recently received threatening letters in the mail then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The victim had recently received threatening letters in the mail
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim had recently received threatening letters in the mail then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the victim had recently received threatening letters in the mail, which shows that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim had recently received threatening letters in the mail then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The victim had recently received threatening letters in the mail
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim had recently received threatening letters in the mail then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the victim had recently received threatening letters in the mail, which establishes that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim had recently received threatening letters in the mail then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The victim had recently received threatening letters in the mail
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, since if the victim had recently received threatening letters in the mail then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the victim had recently received threatening letters in the mail.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim had recently received threatening letters in the mail then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The victim had recently received threatening letters in the mail
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, because if the victim had recently received threatening letters in the mail then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the victim had recently received threatening letters in the mail.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim had recently received threatening letters in the mail then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The victim had recently received threatening letters in the mail
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, as if the victim had recently received threatening letters in the mail then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the victim had recently received threatening letters in the mail.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim had recently received threatening letters in the mail then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The victim had recently received threatening letters in the mail
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim had recently received threatening letters in the mail then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, therefore the victim had not recently received threatening letters in the mail.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim had recently received threatening letters in the mail then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The victim had not recently received threatening letters in the mail
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim had recently received threatening letters in the mail then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, hence the victim had not recently received threatening letters in the mail.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim had recently received threatening letters in the mail then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The victim had not recently received threatening letters in the mail
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim had recently received threatening letters in the mail then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, thus the victim had not recently received threatening letters in the mail.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim had recently received threatening letters in the mail then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The victim had not recently received threatening letters in the mail
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim had recently received threatening letters in the mail then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, so it can be concluded that the victim had not recently received threatening letters in the mail.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim had recently received threatening letters in the mail then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The victim had not recently received threatening letters in the mail
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim had recently received threatening letters in the mail then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, so the victim had not recently received threatening letters in the mail.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim had recently received threatening letters in the mail then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The victim had not recently received threatening letters in the mail
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim had recently received threatening letters in the mail then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which implies that the victim had not recently received threatening letters in the mail.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim had recently received threatening letters in the mail then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The victim had not recently received threatening letters in the mail
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim had recently received threatening letters in the mail then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which shows that the victim had not recently received threatening letters in the mail.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim had recently received threatening letters in the mail then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The victim had not recently received threatening letters in the mail
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim had recently received threatening letters in the mail then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which establishes that the victim had not recently received threatening letters in the mail.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim had recently received threatening letters in the mail then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The victim had not recently received threatening letters in the mail
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.