<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street, and officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene, therefore the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
stringlengths 355
1.02k
|
|---|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, because if a handwritten letter from the suspect was found at the victim's workplace then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and a handwritten letter from the suspect was found at the victim's workplace.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a handwritten letter from the suspect was found at the victim's workplace then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A handwritten letter from the suspect was found at the victim's workplace
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, as if a handwritten letter from the suspect was found at the victim's workplace then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and a handwritten letter from the suspect was found at the victim's workplace.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a handwritten letter from the suspect was found at the victim's workplace then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A handwritten letter from the suspect was found at the victim's workplace
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a handwritten letter from the suspect was found at the victim's workplace then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, therefore a handwritten letter from the suspect was not found at the victim's workplace.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a handwritten letter from the suspect was found at the victim's workplace then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: A handwritten letter from the suspect was not found at the victim's workplace
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a handwritten letter from the suspect was found at the victim's workplace then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, hence a handwritten letter from the suspect was not found at the victim's workplace.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a handwritten letter from the suspect was found at the victim's workplace then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: A handwritten letter from the suspect was not found at the victim's workplace
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a handwritten letter from the suspect was found at the victim's workplace then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, thus a handwritten letter from the suspect was not found at the victim's workplace.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a handwritten letter from the suspect was found at the victim's workplace then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: A handwritten letter from the suspect was not found at the victim's workplace
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a handwritten letter from the suspect was found at the victim's workplace then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, so it can be concluded that a handwritten letter from the suspect was not found at the victim's workplace.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a handwritten letter from the suspect was found at the victim's workplace then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: A handwritten letter from the suspect was not found at the victim's workplace
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a handwritten letter from the suspect was found at the victim's workplace then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, so a handwritten letter from the suspect was not found at the victim's workplace.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a handwritten letter from the suspect was found at the victim's workplace then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: A handwritten letter from the suspect was not found at the victim's workplace
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a handwritten letter from the suspect was found at the victim's workplace then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which implies that a handwritten letter from the suspect was not found at the victim's workplace.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a handwritten letter from the suspect was found at the victim's workplace then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: A handwritten letter from the suspect was not found at the victim's workplace
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a handwritten letter from the suspect was found at the victim's workplace then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which shows that a handwritten letter from the suspect was not found at the victim's workplace.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a handwritten letter from the suspect was found at the victim's workplace then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: A handwritten letter from the suspect was not found at the victim's workplace
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a handwritten letter from the suspect was found at the victim's workplace then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which establishes that a handwritten letter from the suspect was not found at the victim's workplace.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a handwritten letter from the suspect was found at the victim's workplace then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: A handwritten letter from the suspect was not found at the victim's workplace
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```A handwritten letter from the suspect was not found at the victim's workplace, since if a handwritten letter from the suspect was found at the victim's workplace then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a handwritten letter from the suspect was found at the victim's workplace then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: A handwritten letter from the suspect was not found at the victim's workplace
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```A handwritten letter from the suspect was not found at the victim's workplace, because if a handwritten letter from the suspect was found at the victim's workplace then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a handwritten letter from the suspect was found at the victim's workplace then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: A handwritten letter from the suspect was not found at the victim's workplace
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```A handwritten letter from the suspect was not found at the victim's workplace, as if a handwritten letter from the suspect was found at the victim's workplace then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a handwritten letter from the suspect was found at the victim's workplace then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: A handwritten letter from the suspect was not found at the victim's workplace
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the suspect had a history of violence against other individuals then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the suspect had a history of violence against other individuals, therefore the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect had a history of violence against other individuals then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The suspect had a history of violence against other individuals
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the suspect had a history of violence against other individuals then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the suspect had a history of violence against other individuals, hence the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect had a history of violence against other individuals then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The suspect had a history of violence against other individuals
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the suspect had a history of violence against other individuals then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the suspect had a history of violence against other individuals, thus the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect had a history of violence against other individuals then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The suspect had a history of violence against other individuals
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the suspect had a history of violence against other individuals then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the suspect had a history of violence against other individuals, so it can be concluded that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect had a history of violence against other individuals then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The suspect had a history of violence against other individuals
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the suspect had a history of violence against other individuals then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the suspect had a history of violence against other individuals, so the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect had a history of violence against other individuals then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The suspect had a history of violence against other individuals
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the suspect had a history of violence against other individuals then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the suspect had a history of violence against other individuals, which implies that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect had a history of violence against other individuals then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The suspect had a history of violence against other individuals
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the suspect had a history of violence against other individuals then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the suspect had a history of violence against other individuals, which shows that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect had a history of violence against other individuals then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The suspect had a history of violence against other individuals
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the suspect had a history of violence against other individuals then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the suspect had a history of violence against other individuals, which establishes that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect had a history of violence against other individuals then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The suspect had a history of violence against other individuals
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, since if the suspect had a history of violence against other individuals then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the suspect had a history of violence against other individuals.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect had a history of violence against other individuals then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The suspect had a history of violence against other individuals
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, because if the suspect had a history of violence against other individuals then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the suspect had a history of violence against other individuals.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect had a history of violence against other individuals then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The suspect had a history of violence against other individuals
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, as if the suspect had a history of violence against other individuals then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the suspect had a history of violence against other individuals.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect had a history of violence against other individuals then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The suspect had a history of violence against other individuals
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the suspect had a history of violence against other individuals then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, therefore the suspect had no history of violence against other individuals.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect had a history of violence against other individuals then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The suspect had no history of violence against other individuals
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the suspect had a history of violence against other individuals then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, hence the suspect had no history of violence against other individuals.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect had a history of violence against other individuals then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The suspect had no history of violence against other individuals
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the suspect had a history of violence against other individuals then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, thus the suspect had no history of violence against other individuals.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect had a history of violence against other individuals then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The suspect had no history of violence against other individuals
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the suspect had a history of violence against other individuals then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, so it can be concluded that the suspect had no history of violence against other individuals.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect had a history of violence against other individuals then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The suspect had no history of violence against other individuals
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the suspect had a history of violence against other individuals then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, so the suspect had no history of violence against other individuals.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect had a history of violence against other individuals then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The suspect had no history of violence against other individuals
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the suspect had a history of violence against other individuals then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which implies that the suspect had no history of violence against other individuals.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect had a history of violence against other individuals then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The suspect had no history of violence against other individuals
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the suspect had a history of violence against other individuals then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which shows that the suspect had no history of violence against other individuals.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect had a history of violence against other individuals then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The suspect had no history of violence against other individuals
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the suspect had a history of violence against other individuals then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which establishes that the suspect had no history of violence against other individuals.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect had a history of violence against other individuals then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The suspect had no history of violence against other individuals
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The suspect had no history of violence against other individuals, since if the suspect had a history of violence against other individuals then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect had a history of violence against other individuals then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The suspect had no history of violence against other individuals
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The suspect had no history of violence against other individuals, because if the suspect had a history of violence against other individuals then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect had a history of violence against other individuals then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The suspect had no history of violence against other individuals
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The suspect had no history of violence against other individuals, as if the suspect had a history of violence against other individuals then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect had a history of violence against other individuals then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The suspect had no history of violence against other individuals
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a surveillance camera captured the suspect following the victim then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a surveillance camera captured the suspect following the victim, therefore the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a surveillance camera captured the suspect following the victim then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A surveillance camera captured the suspect following the victim
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a surveillance camera captured the suspect following the victim then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a surveillance camera captured the suspect following the victim, hence the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a surveillance camera captured the suspect following the victim then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A surveillance camera captured the suspect following the victim
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a surveillance camera captured the suspect following the victim then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a surveillance camera captured the suspect following the victim, thus the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a surveillance camera captured the suspect following the victim then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A surveillance camera captured the suspect following the victim
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a surveillance camera captured the suspect following the victim then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a surveillance camera captured the suspect following the victim, so it can be concluded that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a surveillance camera captured the suspect following the victim then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A surveillance camera captured the suspect following the victim
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a surveillance camera captured the suspect following the victim then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a surveillance camera captured the suspect following the victim, so the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a surveillance camera captured the suspect following the victim then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A surveillance camera captured the suspect following the victim
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a surveillance camera captured the suspect following the victim then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a surveillance camera captured the suspect following the victim, which implies that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a surveillance camera captured the suspect following the victim then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A surveillance camera captured the suspect following the victim
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a surveillance camera captured the suspect following the victim then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a surveillance camera captured the suspect following the victim, which shows that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a surveillance camera captured the suspect following the victim then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A surveillance camera captured the suspect following the victim
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a surveillance camera captured the suspect following the victim then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a surveillance camera captured the suspect following the victim, which establishes that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a surveillance camera captured the suspect following the victim then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A surveillance camera captured the suspect following the victim
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, since if a surveillance camera captured the suspect following the victim then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and a surveillance camera captured the suspect following the victim.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a surveillance camera captured the suspect following the victim then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A surveillance camera captured the suspect following the victim
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, because if a surveillance camera captured the suspect following the victim then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and a surveillance camera captured the suspect following the victim.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a surveillance camera captured the suspect following the victim then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A surveillance camera captured the suspect following the victim
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, as if a surveillance camera captured the suspect following the victim then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and a surveillance camera captured the suspect following the victim.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a surveillance camera captured the suspect following the victim then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A surveillance camera captured the suspect following the victim
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a surveillance camera captured the suspect following the victim then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, therefore no surveillance camera captured the suspect following the victim.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a surveillance camera captured the suspect following the victim then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: No surveillance camera captured the suspect following the victim
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a surveillance camera captured the suspect following the victim then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, hence no surveillance camera captured the suspect following the victim.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a surveillance camera captured the suspect following the victim then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: No surveillance camera captured the suspect following the victim
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a surveillance camera captured the suspect following the victim then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, thus no surveillance camera captured the suspect following the victim.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a surveillance camera captured the suspect following the victim then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: No surveillance camera captured the suspect following the victim
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a surveillance camera captured the suspect following the victim then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, so it can be concluded that no surveillance camera captured the suspect following the victim.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a surveillance camera captured the suspect following the victim then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: No surveillance camera captured the suspect following the victim
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a surveillance camera captured the suspect following the victim then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, so no surveillance camera captured the suspect following the victim.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a surveillance camera captured the suspect following the victim then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: No surveillance camera captured the suspect following the victim
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a surveillance camera captured the suspect following the victim then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which implies that no surveillance camera captured the suspect following the victim.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a surveillance camera captured the suspect following the victim then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: No surveillance camera captured the suspect following the victim
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a surveillance camera captured the suspect following the victim then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which shows that no surveillance camera captured the suspect following the victim.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a surveillance camera captured the suspect following the victim then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: No surveillance camera captured the suspect following the victim
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a surveillance camera captured the suspect following the victim then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which establishes that no surveillance camera captured the suspect following the victim.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a surveillance camera captured the suspect following the victim then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: No surveillance camera captured the suspect following the victim
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```No surveillance camera captured the suspect following the victim, since if a surveillance camera captured the suspect following the victim then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a surveillance camera captured the suspect following the victim then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: No surveillance camera captured the suspect following the victim
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```No surveillance camera captured the suspect following the victim, because if a surveillance camera captured the suspect following the victim then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a surveillance camera captured the suspect following the victim then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: No surveillance camera captured the suspect following the victim
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```No surveillance camera captured the suspect following the victim, as if a surveillance camera captured the suspect following the victim then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a surveillance camera captured the suspect following the victim then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: No surveillance camera captured the suspect following the victim
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim's laptop contained evidence of financial embezzlement then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the victim's laptop contained evidence of financial embezzlement, therefore the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's laptop contained evidence of financial embezzlement then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The victim's laptop contained evidence of financial embezzlement
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim's laptop contained evidence of financial embezzlement then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the victim's laptop contained evidence of financial embezzlement, hence the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's laptop contained evidence of financial embezzlement then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The victim's laptop contained evidence of financial embezzlement
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim's laptop contained evidence of financial embezzlement then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the victim's laptop contained evidence of financial embezzlement, thus the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's laptop contained evidence of financial embezzlement then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The victim's laptop contained evidence of financial embezzlement
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim's laptop contained evidence of financial embezzlement then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the victim's laptop contained evidence of financial embezzlement, so it can be concluded that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's laptop contained evidence of financial embezzlement then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The victim's laptop contained evidence of financial embezzlement
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim's laptop contained evidence of financial embezzlement then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the victim's laptop contained evidence of financial embezzlement, so the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's laptop contained evidence of financial embezzlement then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The victim's laptop contained evidence of financial embezzlement
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim's laptop contained evidence of financial embezzlement then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the victim's laptop contained evidence of financial embezzlement, which implies that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's laptop contained evidence of financial embezzlement then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The victim's laptop contained evidence of financial embezzlement
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim's laptop contained evidence of financial embezzlement then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the victim's laptop contained evidence of financial embezzlement, which shows that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's laptop contained evidence of financial embezzlement then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The victim's laptop contained evidence of financial embezzlement
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim's laptop contained evidence of financial embezzlement then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the victim's laptop contained evidence of financial embezzlement, which establishes that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's laptop contained evidence of financial embezzlement then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The victim's laptop contained evidence of financial embezzlement
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, since if the victim's laptop contained evidence of financial embezzlement then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the victim's laptop contained evidence of financial embezzlement.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's laptop contained evidence of financial embezzlement then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The victim's laptop contained evidence of financial embezzlement
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, because if the victim's laptop contained evidence of financial embezzlement then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the victim's laptop contained evidence of financial embezzlement.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's laptop contained evidence of financial embezzlement then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The victim's laptop contained evidence of financial embezzlement
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, as if the victim's laptop contained evidence of financial embezzlement then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the victim's laptop contained evidence of financial embezzlement.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's laptop contained evidence of financial embezzlement then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The victim's laptop contained evidence of financial embezzlement
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim's laptop contained evidence of financial embezzlement then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, therefore the victim's laptop did not contain evidence of financial embezzlement.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's laptop contained evidence of financial embezzlement then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The victim's laptop did not contain evidence of financial embezzlement
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim's laptop contained evidence of financial embezzlement then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, hence the victim's laptop did not contain evidence of financial embezzlement.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's laptop contained evidence of financial embezzlement then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The victim's laptop did not contain evidence of financial embezzlement
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim's laptop contained evidence of financial embezzlement then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, thus the victim's laptop did not contain evidence of financial embezzlement.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's laptop contained evidence of financial embezzlement then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The victim's laptop did not contain evidence of financial embezzlement
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim's laptop contained evidence of financial embezzlement then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, so it can be concluded that the victim's laptop did not contain evidence of financial embezzlement.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's laptop contained evidence of financial embezzlement then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The victim's laptop did not contain evidence of financial embezzlement
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim's laptop contained evidence of financial embezzlement then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, so the victim's laptop did not contain evidence of financial embezzlement.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's laptop contained evidence of financial embezzlement then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The victim's laptop did not contain evidence of financial embezzlement
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim's laptop contained evidence of financial embezzlement then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which implies that the victim's laptop did not contain evidence of financial embezzlement.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's laptop contained evidence of financial embezzlement then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The victim's laptop did not contain evidence of financial embezzlement
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim's laptop contained evidence of financial embezzlement then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which shows that the victim's laptop did not contain evidence of financial embezzlement.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's laptop contained evidence of financial embezzlement then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The victim's laptop did not contain evidence of financial embezzlement
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim's laptop contained evidence of financial embezzlement then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which establishes that the victim's laptop did not contain evidence of financial embezzlement.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's laptop contained evidence of financial embezzlement then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The victim's laptop did not contain evidence of financial embezzlement
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The victim's laptop did not contain evidence of financial embezzlement, since if the victim's laptop contained evidence of financial embezzlement then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's laptop contained evidence of financial embezzlement then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The victim's laptop did not contain evidence of financial embezzlement
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The victim's laptop did not contain evidence of financial embezzlement, because if the victim's laptop contained evidence of financial embezzlement then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's laptop contained evidence of financial embezzlement then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The victim's laptop did not contain evidence of financial embezzlement
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The victim's laptop did not contain evidence of financial embezzlement, as if the victim's laptop contained evidence of financial embezzlement then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's laptop contained evidence of financial embezzlement then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The victim's laptop did not contain evidence of financial embezzlement
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the suspect's dna was found on a cigarette butt at the crime scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the suspect's dna was found on a cigarette butt at the crime scene, therefore the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect's dna was found on a cigarette butt at the crime scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The suspect's dna was found on a cigarette butt at the crime scene
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the suspect's dna was found on a cigarette butt at the crime scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the suspect's dna was found on a cigarette butt at the crime scene, hence the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect's dna was found on a cigarette butt at the crime scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The suspect's dna was found on a cigarette butt at the crime scene
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the suspect's dna was found on a cigarette butt at the crime scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the suspect's dna was found on a cigarette butt at the crime scene, thus the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect's dna was found on a cigarette butt at the crime scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The suspect's dna was found on a cigarette butt at the crime scene
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the suspect's dna was found on a cigarette butt at the crime scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the suspect's dna was found on a cigarette butt at the crime scene, so it can be concluded that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect's dna was found on a cigarette butt at the crime scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The suspect's dna was found on a cigarette butt at the crime scene
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the suspect's dna was found on a cigarette butt at the crime scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the suspect's dna was found on a cigarette butt at the crime scene, so the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect's dna was found on a cigarette butt at the crime scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The suspect's dna was found on a cigarette butt at the crime scene
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the suspect's dna was found on a cigarette butt at the crime scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the suspect's dna was found on a cigarette butt at the crime scene, which implies that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect's dna was found on a cigarette butt at the crime scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The suspect's dna was found on a cigarette butt at the crime scene
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the suspect's dna was found on a cigarette butt at the crime scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the suspect's dna was found on a cigarette butt at the crime scene, which shows that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect's dna was found on a cigarette butt at the crime scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The suspect's dna was found on a cigarette butt at the crime scene
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the suspect's dna was found on a cigarette butt at the crime scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the suspect's dna was found on a cigarette butt at the crime scene, which establishes that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect's dna was found on a cigarette butt at the crime scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The suspect's dna was found on a cigarette butt at the crime scene
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, since if the suspect's dna was found on a cigarette butt at the crime scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the suspect's dna was found on a cigarette butt at the crime scene.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect's dna was found on a cigarette butt at the crime scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The suspect's dna was found on a cigarette butt at the crime scene
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, because if the suspect's dna was found on a cigarette butt at the crime scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the suspect's dna was found on a cigarette butt at the crime scene.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect's dna was found on a cigarette butt at the crime scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The suspect's dna was found on a cigarette butt at the crime scene
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, as if the suspect's dna was found on a cigarette butt at the crime scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the suspect's dna was found on a cigarette butt at the crime scene.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect's dna was found on a cigarette butt at the crime scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The suspect's dna was found on a cigarette butt at the crime scene
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the suspect's dna was found on a cigarette butt at the crime scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, therefore the suspect's dna was not found on a cigarette butt at the crime scene.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect's dna was found on a cigarette butt at the crime scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The suspect's DNA was not found on a cigarette butt at the crime scene
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the suspect's dna was found on a cigarette butt at the crime scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, hence the suspect's dna was not found on a cigarette butt at the crime scene.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect's dna was found on a cigarette butt at the crime scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The suspect's DNA was not found on a cigarette butt at the crime scene
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the suspect's dna was found on a cigarette butt at the crime scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, thus the suspect's dna was not found on a cigarette butt at the crime scene.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect's dna was found on a cigarette butt at the crime scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The suspect's DNA was not found on a cigarette butt at the crime scene
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the suspect's dna was found on a cigarette butt at the crime scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, so it can be concluded that the suspect's dna was not found on a cigarette butt at the crime scene.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect's dna was found on a cigarette butt at the crime scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The suspect's DNA was not found on a cigarette butt at the crime scene
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the suspect's dna was found on a cigarette butt at the crime scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, so the suspect's dna was not found on a cigarette butt at the crime scene.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect's dna was found on a cigarette butt at the crime scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The suspect's DNA was not found on a cigarette butt at the crime scene
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the suspect's dna was found on a cigarette butt at the crime scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which implies that the suspect's dna was not found on a cigarette butt at the crime scene.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect's dna was found on a cigarette butt at the crime scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The suspect's DNA was not found on a cigarette butt at the crime scene
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the suspect's dna was found on a cigarette butt at the crime scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which shows that the suspect's dna was not found on a cigarette butt at the crime scene.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect's dna was found on a cigarette butt at the crime scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The suspect's DNA was not found on a cigarette butt at the crime scene
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the suspect's dna was found on a cigarette butt at the crime scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which establishes that the suspect's dna was not found on a cigarette butt at the crime scene.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect's dna was found on a cigarette butt at the crime scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The suspect's DNA was not found on a cigarette butt at the crime scene
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The suspect's dna was not found on a cigarette butt at the crime scene, since if the suspect's dna was found on a cigarette butt at the crime scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect's dna was found on a cigarette butt at the crime scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The suspect's DNA was not found on a cigarette butt at the crime scene
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The suspect's dna was not found on a cigarette butt at the crime scene, because if the suspect's dna was found on a cigarette butt at the crime scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect's dna was found on a cigarette butt at the crime scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The suspect's DNA was not found on a cigarette butt at the crime scene
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.