<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street, and officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene, therefore the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
stringlengths 355
1.02k
|
|---|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The suspect's dna was not found on a cigarette butt at the crime scene, as if the suspect's dna was found on a cigarette butt at the crime scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect's dna was found on a cigarette butt at the crime scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The suspect's DNA was not found on a cigarette butt at the crime scene
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim had recently hired a private investigator to look into the suspect then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the victim had recently hired a private investigator to look into the suspect, therefore the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim had recently hired a private investigator to look into the suspect then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The victim had recently hired a private investigator to look into the suspect
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim had recently hired a private investigator to look into the suspect then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the victim had recently hired a private investigator to look into the suspect, hence the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim had recently hired a private investigator to look into the suspect then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The victim had recently hired a private investigator to look into the suspect
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim had recently hired a private investigator to look into the suspect then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the victim had recently hired a private investigator to look into the suspect, thus the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim had recently hired a private investigator to look into the suspect then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The victim had recently hired a private investigator to look into the suspect
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim had recently hired a private investigator to look into the suspect then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the victim had recently hired a private investigator to look into the suspect, so it can be concluded that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim had recently hired a private investigator to look into the suspect then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The victim had recently hired a private investigator to look into the suspect
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim had recently hired a private investigator to look into the suspect then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the victim had recently hired a private investigator to look into the suspect, so the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim had recently hired a private investigator to look into the suspect then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The victim had recently hired a private investigator to look into the suspect
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim had recently hired a private investigator to look into the suspect then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the victim had recently hired a private investigator to look into the suspect, which implies that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim had recently hired a private investigator to look into the suspect then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The victim had recently hired a private investigator to look into the suspect
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim had recently hired a private investigator to look into the suspect then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the victim had recently hired a private investigator to look into the suspect, which shows that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim had recently hired a private investigator to look into the suspect then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The victim had recently hired a private investigator to look into the suspect
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim had recently hired a private investigator to look into the suspect then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the victim had recently hired a private investigator to look into the suspect, which establishes that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim had recently hired a private investigator to look into the suspect then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The victim had recently hired a private investigator to look into the suspect
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, since if the victim had recently hired a private investigator to look into the suspect then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the victim had recently hired a private investigator to look into the suspect.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim had recently hired a private investigator to look into the suspect then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The victim had recently hired a private investigator to look into the suspect
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, because if the victim had recently hired a private investigator to look into the suspect then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the victim had recently hired a private investigator to look into the suspect.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim had recently hired a private investigator to look into the suspect then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The victim had recently hired a private investigator to look into the suspect
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, as if the victim had recently hired a private investigator to look into the suspect then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the victim had recently hired a private investigator to look into the suspect.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim had recently hired a private investigator to look into the suspect then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The victim had recently hired a private investigator to look into the suspect
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim had recently hired a private investigator to look into the suspect then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, therefore the victim had not recently hired a private investigator to look into the suspect.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim had recently hired a private investigator to look into the suspect then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The victim had not recently hired a private investigator to look into the suspect
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim had recently hired a private investigator to look into the suspect then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, hence the victim had not recently hired a private investigator to look into the suspect.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim had recently hired a private investigator to look into the suspect then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The victim had not recently hired a private investigator to look into the suspect
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim had recently hired a private investigator to look into the suspect then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, thus the victim had not recently hired a private investigator to look into the suspect.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim had recently hired a private investigator to look into the suspect then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The victim had not recently hired a private investigator to look into the suspect
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim had recently hired a private investigator to look into the suspect then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, so it can be concluded that the victim had not recently hired a private investigator to look into the suspect.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim had recently hired a private investigator to look into the suspect then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The victim had not recently hired a private investigator to look into the suspect
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim had recently hired a private investigator to look into the suspect then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, so the victim had not recently hired a private investigator to look into the suspect.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim had recently hired a private investigator to look into the suspect then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The victim had not recently hired a private investigator to look into the suspect
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim had recently hired a private investigator to look into the suspect then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which implies that the victim had not recently hired a private investigator to look into the suspect.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim had recently hired a private investigator to look into the suspect then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The victim had not recently hired a private investigator to look into the suspect
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim had recently hired a private investigator to look into the suspect then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which shows that the victim had not recently hired a private investigator to look into the suspect.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim had recently hired a private investigator to look into the suspect then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The victim had not recently hired a private investigator to look into the suspect
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim had recently hired a private investigator to look into the suspect then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which establishes that the victim had not recently hired a private investigator to look into the suspect.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim had recently hired a private investigator to look into the suspect then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The victim had not recently hired a private investigator to look into the suspect
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The victim had not recently hired a private investigator to look into the suspect, since if the victim had recently hired a private investigator to look into the suspect then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim had recently hired a private investigator to look into the suspect then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The victim had not recently hired a private investigator to look into the suspect
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The victim had not recently hired a private investigator to look into the suspect, because if the victim had recently hired a private investigator to look into the suspect then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim had recently hired a private investigator to look into the suspect then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The victim had not recently hired a private investigator to look into the suspect
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The victim had not recently hired a private investigator to look into the suspect, as if the victim had recently hired a private investigator to look into the suspect then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim had recently hired a private investigator to look into the suspect then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The victim had not recently hired a private investigator to look into the suspect
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a neighbor reported seeing the suspect with a bag of cement in their car then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a neighbor reported seeing the suspect with a bag of cement in their car, therefore the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a neighbor reported seeing the suspect with a bag of cement in their car then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A neighbor reported seeing the suspect with a bag of cement in their car
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a neighbor reported seeing the suspect with a bag of cement in their car then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a neighbor reported seeing the suspect with a bag of cement in their car, hence the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a neighbor reported seeing the suspect with a bag of cement in their car then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A neighbor reported seeing the suspect with a bag of cement in their car
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a neighbor reported seeing the suspect with a bag of cement in their car then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a neighbor reported seeing the suspect with a bag of cement in their car, thus the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a neighbor reported seeing the suspect with a bag of cement in their car then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A neighbor reported seeing the suspect with a bag of cement in their car
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a neighbor reported seeing the suspect with a bag of cement in their car then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a neighbor reported seeing the suspect with a bag of cement in their car, so it can be concluded that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a neighbor reported seeing the suspect with a bag of cement in their car then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A neighbor reported seeing the suspect with a bag of cement in their car
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a neighbor reported seeing the suspect with a bag of cement in their car then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a neighbor reported seeing the suspect with a bag of cement in their car, so the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a neighbor reported seeing the suspect with a bag of cement in their car then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A neighbor reported seeing the suspect with a bag of cement in their car
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a neighbor reported seeing the suspect with a bag of cement in their car then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a neighbor reported seeing the suspect with a bag of cement in their car, which implies that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a neighbor reported seeing the suspect with a bag of cement in their car then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A neighbor reported seeing the suspect with a bag of cement in their car
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a neighbor reported seeing the suspect with a bag of cement in their car then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a neighbor reported seeing the suspect with a bag of cement in their car, which shows that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a neighbor reported seeing the suspect with a bag of cement in their car then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A neighbor reported seeing the suspect with a bag of cement in their car
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a neighbor reported seeing the suspect with a bag of cement in their car then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a neighbor reported seeing the suspect with a bag of cement in their car, which establishes that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a neighbor reported seeing the suspect with a bag of cement in their car then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A neighbor reported seeing the suspect with a bag of cement in their car
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, since if a neighbor reported seeing the suspect with a bag of cement in their car then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and a neighbor reported seeing the suspect with a bag of cement in their car.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a neighbor reported seeing the suspect with a bag of cement in their car then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A neighbor reported seeing the suspect with a bag of cement in their car
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, because if a neighbor reported seeing the suspect with a bag of cement in their car then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and a neighbor reported seeing the suspect with a bag of cement in their car.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a neighbor reported seeing the suspect with a bag of cement in their car then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A neighbor reported seeing the suspect with a bag of cement in their car
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, as if a neighbor reported seeing the suspect with a bag of cement in their car then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and a neighbor reported seeing the suspect with a bag of cement in their car.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a neighbor reported seeing the suspect with a bag of cement in their car then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A neighbor reported seeing the suspect with a bag of cement in their car
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a neighbor reported seeing the suspect with a bag of cement in their car then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, therefore a neighbor did not report seeing the suspect with a bag of cement in their car.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a neighbor reported seeing the suspect with a bag of cement in their car then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: A neighbor did not report seeing the suspect with a bag of cement in their car
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a neighbor reported seeing the suspect with a bag of cement in their car then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, hence a neighbor did not report seeing the suspect with a bag of cement in their car.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a neighbor reported seeing the suspect with a bag of cement in their car then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: A neighbor did not report seeing the suspect with a bag of cement in their car
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a neighbor reported seeing the suspect with a bag of cement in their car then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, thus a neighbor did not report seeing the suspect with a bag of cement in their car.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a neighbor reported seeing the suspect with a bag of cement in their car then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: A neighbor did not report seeing the suspect with a bag of cement in their car
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a neighbor reported seeing the suspect with a bag of cement in their car then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, so it can be concluded that a neighbor did not report seeing the suspect with a bag of cement in their car.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a neighbor reported seeing the suspect with a bag of cement in their car then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: A neighbor did not report seeing the suspect with a bag of cement in their car
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a neighbor reported seeing the suspect with a bag of cement in their car then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, so a neighbor did not report seeing the suspect with a bag of cement in their car.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a neighbor reported seeing the suspect with a bag of cement in their car then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: A neighbor did not report seeing the suspect with a bag of cement in their car
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a neighbor reported seeing the suspect with a bag of cement in their car then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which implies that a neighbor did not report seeing the suspect with a bag of cement in their car.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a neighbor reported seeing the suspect with a bag of cement in their car then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: A neighbor did not report seeing the suspect with a bag of cement in their car
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a neighbor reported seeing the suspect with a bag of cement in their car then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which shows that a neighbor did not report seeing the suspect with a bag of cement in their car.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a neighbor reported seeing the suspect with a bag of cement in their car then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: A neighbor did not report seeing the suspect with a bag of cement in their car
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a neighbor reported seeing the suspect with a bag of cement in their car then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which establishes that a neighbor did not report seeing the suspect with a bag of cement in their car.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a neighbor reported seeing the suspect with a bag of cement in their car then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: A neighbor did not report seeing the suspect with a bag of cement in their car
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```A neighbor did not report seeing the suspect with a bag of cement in their car, since if a neighbor reported seeing the suspect with a bag of cement in their car then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a neighbor reported seeing the suspect with a bag of cement in their car then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: A neighbor did not report seeing the suspect with a bag of cement in their car
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```A neighbor did not report seeing the suspect with a bag of cement in their car, because if a neighbor reported seeing the suspect with a bag of cement in their car then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a neighbor reported seeing the suspect with a bag of cement in their car then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: A neighbor did not report seeing the suspect with a bag of cement in their car
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```A neighbor did not report seeing the suspect with a bag of cement in their car, as if a neighbor reported seeing the suspect with a bag of cement in their car then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a neighbor reported seeing the suspect with a bag of cement in their car then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: A neighbor did not report seeing the suspect with a bag of cement in their car
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim's life insurance policy had been increased just before the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the victim's life insurance policy had been increased just before the murder, therefore the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's life insurance policy had been increased just before the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The victim's life insurance policy had been increased just before the murder
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim's life insurance policy had been increased just before the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the victim's life insurance policy had been increased just before the murder, hence the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's life insurance policy had been increased just before the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The victim's life insurance policy had been increased just before the murder
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim's life insurance policy had been increased just before the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the victim's life insurance policy had been increased just before the murder, thus the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's life insurance policy had been increased just before the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The victim's life insurance policy had been increased just before the murder
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim's life insurance policy had been increased just before the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the victim's life insurance policy had been increased just before the murder, so it can be concluded that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's life insurance policy had been increased just before the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The victim's life insurance policy had been increased just before the murder
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim's life insurance policy had been increased just before the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the victim's life insurance policy had been increased just before the murder, so the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's life insurance policy had been increased just before the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The victim's life insurance policy had been increased just before the murder
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim's life insurance policy had been increased just before the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the victim's life insurance policy had been increased just before the murder, which implies that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's life insurance policy had been increased just before the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The victim's life insurance policy had been increased just before the murder
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim's life insurance policy had been increased just before the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the victim's life insurance policy had been increased just before the murder, which shows that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's life insurance policy had been increased just before the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The victim's life insurance policy had been increased just before the murder
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim's life insurance policy had been increased just before the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the victim's life insurance policy had been increased just before the murder, which establishes that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's life insurance policy had been increased just before the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The victim's life insurance policy had been increased just before the murder
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, since if the victim's life insurance policy had been increased just before the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the victim's life insurance policy had been increased just before the murder.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's life insurance policy had been increased just before the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The victim's life insurance policy had been increased just before the murder
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, because if the victim's life insurance policy had been increased just before the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the victim's life insurance policy had been increased just before the murder.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's life insurance policy had been increased just before the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The victim's life insurance policy had been increased just before the murder
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, as if the victim's life insurance policy had been increased just before the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the victim's life insurance policy had been increased just before the murder.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's life insurance policy had been increased just before the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The victim's life insurance policy had been increased just before the murder
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim's life insurance policy had been increased just before the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, therefore the victim's life insurance policy had not been increased just before the murder.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's life insurance policy had been increased just before the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The victim's life insurance policy had not been increased just before the murder
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim's life insurance policy had been increased just before the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, hence the victim's life insurance policy had not been increased just before the murder.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's life insurance policy had been increased just before the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The victim's life insurance policy had not been increased just before the murder
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim's life insurance policy had been increased just before the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, thus the victim's life insurance policy had not been increased just before the murder.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's life insurance policy had been increased just before the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The victim's life insurance policy had not been increased just before the murder
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim's life insurance policy had been increased just before the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, so it can be concluded that the victim's life insurance policy had not been increased just before the murder.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's life insurance policy had been increased just before the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The victim's life insurance policy had not been increased just before the murder
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim's life insurance policy had been increased just before the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, so the victim's life insurance policy had not been increased just before the murder.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's life insurance policy had been increased just before the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The victim's life insurance policy had not been increased just before the murder
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim's life insurance policy had been increased just before the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which implies that the victim's life insurance policy had not been increased just before the murder.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's life insurance policy had been increased just before the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The victim's life insurance policy had not been increased just before the murder
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim's life insurance policy had been increased just before the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which shows that the victim's life insurance policy had not been increased just before the murder.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's life insurance policy had been increased just before the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The victim's life insurance policy had not been increased just before the murder
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim's life insurance policy had been increased just before the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which establishes that the victim's life insurance policy had not been increased just before the murder.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's life insurance policy had been increased just before the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The victim's life insurance policy had not been increased just before the murder
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The victim's life insurance policy had not been increased just before the murder, since if the victim's life insurance policy had been increased just before the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's life insurance policy had been increased just before the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The victim's life insurance policy had not been increased just before the murder
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The victim's life insurance policy had not been increased just before the murder, because if the victim's life insurance policy had been increased just before the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's life insurance policy had been increased just before the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The victim's life insurance policy had not been increased just before the murder
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The victim's life insurance policy had not been increased just before the murder, as if the victim's life insurance policy had been increased just before the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's life insurance policy had been increased just before the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The victim's life insurance policy had not been increased just before the murder
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the suspect had a history of making anonymous threats to the victim then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the suspect had a history of making anonymous threats to the victim, therefore the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect had a history of making anonymous threats to the victim then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The suspect had a history of making anonymous threats to the victim
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the suspect had a history of making anonymous threats to the victim then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the suspect had a history of making anonymous threats to the victim, hence the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect had a history of making anonymous threats to the victim then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The suspect had a history of making anonymous threats to the victim
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the suspect had a history of making anonymous threats to the victim then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the suspect had a history of making anonymous threats to the victim, thus the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect had a history of making anonymous threats to the victim then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The suspect had a history of making anonymous threats to the victim
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the suspect had a history of making anonymous threats to the victim then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the suspect had a history of making anonymous threats to the victim, so it can be concluded that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect had a history of making anonymous threats to the victim then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The suspect had a history of making anonymous threats to the victim
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the suspect had a history of making anonymous threats to the victim then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the suspect had a history of making anonymous threats to the victim, so the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect had a history of making anonymous threats to the victim then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The suspect had a history of making anonymous threats to the victim
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the suspect had a history of making anonymous threats to the victim then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the suspect had a history of making anonymous threats to the victim, which implies that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect had a history of making anonymous threats to the victim then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The suspect had a history of making anonymous threats to the victim
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the suspect had a history of making anonymous threats to the victim then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the suspect had a history of making anonymous threats to the victim, which shows that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect had a history of making anonymous threats to the victim then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The suspect had a history of making anonymous threats to the victim
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the suspect had a history of making anonymous threats to the victim then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the suspect had a history of making anonymous threats to the victim, which establishes that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect had a history of making anonymous threats to the victim then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The suspect had a history of making anonymous threats to the victim
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, since if the suspect had a history of making anonymous threats to the victim then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the suspect had a history of making anonymous threats to the victim.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect had a history of making anonymous threats to the victim then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The suspect had a history of making anonymous threats to the victim
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, because if the suspect had a history of making anonymous threats to the victim then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the suspect had a history of making anonymous threats to the victim.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect had a history of making anonymous threats to the victim then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The suspect had a history of making anonymous threats to the victim
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, as if the suspect had a history of making anonymous threats to the victim then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the suspect had a history of making anonymous threats to the victim.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect had a history of making anonymous threats to the victim then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The suspect had a history of making anonymous threats to the victim
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the suspect had a history of making anonymous threats to the victim then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, therefore the suspect had no history of making anonymous threats to the victim.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect had a history of making anonymous threats to the victim then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The suspect had no history of making anonymous threats to the victim
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the suspect had a history of making anonymous threats to the victim then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, hence the suspect had no history of making anonymous threats to the victim.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect had a history of making anonymous threats to the victim then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The suspect had no history of making anonymous threats to the victim
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the suspect had a history of making anonymous threats to the victim then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, thus the suspect had no history of making anonymous threats to the victim.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect had a history of making anonymous threats to the victim then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The suspect had no history of making anonymous threats to the victim
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the suspect had a history of making anonymous threats to the victim then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, so it can be concluded that the suspect had no history of making anonymous threats to the victim.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect had a history of making anonymous threats to the victim then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The suspect had no history of making anonymous threats to the victim
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the suspect had a history of making anonymous threats to the victim then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, so the suspect had no history of making anonymous threats to the victim.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect had a history of making anonymous threats to the victim then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The suspect had no history of making anonymous threats to the victim
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the suspect had a history of making anonymous threats to the victim then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which implies that the suspect had no history of making anonymous threats to the victim.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect had a history of making anonymous threats to the victim then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The suspect had no history of making anonymous threats to the victim
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the suspect had a history of making anonymous threats to the victim then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which shows that the suspect had no history of making anonymous threats to the victim.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect had a history of making anonymous threats to the victim then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The suspect had no history of making anonymous threats to the victim
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the suspect had a history of making anonymous threats to the victim then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which establishes that the suspect had no history of making anonymous threats to the victim.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect had a history of making anonymous threats to the victim then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The suspect had no history of making anonymous threats to the victim
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The suspect had no history of making anonymous threats to the victim, since if the suspect had a history of making anonymous threats to the victim then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect had a history of making anonymous threats to the victim then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The suspect had no history of making anonymous threats to the victim
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The suspect had no history of making anonymous threats to the victim, because if the suspect had a history of making anonymous threats to the victim then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect had a history of making anonymous threats to the victim then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The suspect had no history of making anonymous threats to the victim
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The suspect had no history of making anonymous threats to the victim, as if the suspect had a history of making anonymous threats to the victim then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect had a history of making anonymous threats to the victim then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The suspect had no history of making anonymous threats to the victim
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a witness claimed to have seen the suspect near the victim's workplace then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a witness claimed to have seen the suspect near the victim's workplace, therefore the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a witness claimed to have seen the suspect near the victim's workplace then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A witness claimed to have seen the suspect near the victim's workplace
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a witness claimed to have seen the suspect near the victim's workplace then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a witness claimed to have seen the suspect near the victim's workplace, hence the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a witness claimed to have seen the suspect near the victim's workplace then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A witness claimed to have seen the suspect near the victim's workplace
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a witness claimed to have seen the suspect near the victim's workplace then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a witness claimed to have seen the suspect near the victim's workplace, thus the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a witness claimed to have seen the suspect near the victim's workplace then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A witness claimed to have seen the suspect near the victim's workplace
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a witness claimed to have seen the suspect near the victim's workplace then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a witness claimed to have seen the suspect near the victim's workplace, so it can be concluded that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a witness claimed to have seen the suspect near the victim's workplace then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A witness claimed to have seen the suspect near the victim's workplace
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a witness claimed to have seen the suspect near the victim's workplace then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a witness claimed to have seen the suspect near the victim's workplace, so the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a witness claimed to have seen the suspect near the victim's workplace then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A witness claimed to have seen the suspect near the victim's workplace
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a witness claimed to have seen the suspect near the victim's workplace then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a witness claimed to have seen the suspect near the victim's workplace, which implies that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a witness claimed to have seen the suspect near the victim's workplace then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A witness claimed to have seen the suspect near the victim's workplace
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a witness claimed to have seen the suspect near the victim's workplace then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a witness claimed to have seen the suspect near the victim's workplace, which shows that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a witness claimed to have seen the suspect near the victim's workplace then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A witness claimed to have seen the suspect near the victim's workplace
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a witness claimed to have seen the suspect near the victim's workplace then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a witness claimed to have seen the suspect near the victim's workplace, which establishes that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a witness claimed to have seen the suspect near the victim's workplace then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A witness claimed to have seen the suspect near the victim's workplace
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, since if a witness claimed to have seen the suspect near the victim's workplace then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and a witness claimed to have seen the suspect near the victim's workplace.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a witness claimed to have seen the suspect near the victim's workplace then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A witness claimed to have seen the suspect near the victim's workplace
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, because if a witness claimed to have seen the suspect near the victim's workplace then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and a witness claimed to have seen the suspect near the victim's workplace.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a witness claimed to have seen the suspect near the victim's workplace then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A witness claimed to have seen the suspect near the victim's workplace
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, as if a witness claimed to have seen the suspect near the victim's workplace then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and a witness claimed to have seen the suspect near the victim's workplace.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a witness claimed to have seen the suspect near the victim's workplace then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A witness claimed to have seen the suspect near the victim's workplace
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.