answers
dict | title
stringlengths 16
40
| context
stringlengths 13
1.96k
| question
stringclasses 124
values | id
stringlengths 1
5
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
{
"text": [
"0.98 V"
],
"answer_start": [
106
]
} | 10.1016/j.solmat.2015.10.008 | Devices employing PDPP3T as HTL showed a high PCE of 12.3%, with a very high Jsc of 20.5 mA/cm2, a Voc of 0.98 V and a FF of 61.2%. | What is the value of Voc? | 9155 |
{
"text": [
"0.64V"
],
"answer_start": [
304
]
} | 10.1016/j.electacta.2019.02.077 | The relatively larger VOC observed in DM1 (0.70V) and DM2 (0.67V) when compared to their corresponding isomers suggests that the methyl unit substitution near donor has possibly reduced the charge recombination by retarding the approach of triiodide (I3−) at the TiO2 surface than dyes MA1 (0.57V), MA2 (0.64V) which has shown lower VOC.To elucidate further the effect of methyl group in DM and MA dyes on the performance of DSSC, electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) were conducted. | What is the value of VOC? | 36280 |
{
"text": [
"20.0%"
],
"answer_start": [
245
]
} | 10.1016/j.joule.2018.08.012 | Although the FTO-based device has a slightly higher FF than the ITO-based device, the JSC of the FTO device is 0.7 mA/cm2 lower than the ITO device, due to the poorer transmittance in FTO substrate, resulting in a PCE of 19.2% compared with the 20.0% achieved on the ITO substrate. | What is the value of PCE? | 7795 |
{
"text": [
"0.90V"
],
"answer_start": [
262
]
} | 10.1016/j.electacta.2018.06.112 | The PCE of champion NH4F-PSC with forward scan slightly decreases to 14.48% with a isc of 21.30mAcm−2, a Voc of 1.02V, and a FF of 66.65%, by contrast, the forward PCE for the device with pristine TiO2 drops sharply to 10.85% with a isc of 18.95mAcm−2, a Voc of 0.90V, and a FF of 63.61%. | What is the value of Voc? | 1167 |
{
"text": [
"ITO"
],
"answer_start": [
4
]
} | 10.1039/C8NR06095A | The ITO/MoOx/CT based perovskite solar modules exhibited a stable photovoltaic performance under a wet environment, which indicates that the hydrophobic ITO/MoOx/CT trilayer can effectively minimize the moisture and oxygen induced degradation of the CH3NH3PbI3 perovskite thin film.Financial support for this work provided by the Ministry of Science and Technology (MOST) (MOST 106-2731-M-033-002, 106-2218-E-182-005-MY2 and 107-2122-M-033-001-MY3) and the Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou, Taiwan (CMEPD2G0303 and BMRPC074) is gratefully acknowledged. | What is ITO? | 19912 |
{
"text": [
"715 mV"
],
"answer_start": [
160
]
} | 10.1016/j.orgel.2013.07.007 | Under standard global AM 1.5 G solar conditions, the dye PTDA with A–π–D–π–A framework gave better results of photovoltaic parameters (Jsc= 14.37 mA cm−2, Voc= 715 mV and FF = 0.66), corresponding to an overall power conversion efficiency of 6.82%. | What is the value of Voc? | 51670 |
{
"text": [
"9.27%"
],
"answer_start": [
141
]
} | 10.1016/j.mtener.2017.10.004 | The η of the DSSCs with the CEs having CoSe2/CoSeO3-NP-20μL, CoSe2/CoSeO3-NP-40μL, CoSe2/CoSeO3-NP-60μL, and CoSe2/CoSeO3-NP-80μL are 8.08%, 9.27%, 8.59%, and 8.19%, respectively. | What is the value of η? | 27549 |
{
"text": [
"4.62%"
],
"answer_start": [
97
]
} | 10.1016/j.matlet.2018.11.049 | DSSCs prepared with TiO2 commercial paste (C-TiO2) alone showed power conversion efficiency of η=4.62%. | What is the value of η? | 48343 |
{
"text": [
"2.3"
],
"answer_start": [
80
]
} | 10.1039/C5TA00801H | Fluorine-doped tin oxide (FTO) conducting glass substrates (TEC8, 8 ohms sq.−1, 2.3 mm thick) were purchased from Pilkington, France. | What is tin oxide? | 77146 |
{
"text": [
"330"
],
"answer_start": [
205
]
} | 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.09.021 | Due to the effective charge transport in the SnO2 HNS film resulted from interconnections between the SnO2 HNSs, the SnO2 HNS–TiO2 based DSSCs exhibited a high PCE of 6.54%, which shows a 53.8%, 21.5% and 330% improvement compared with the commercial SnO2–TiO2, commercial P25 and SnO2 HNS based DSSCs, respectively. | What is SnO2? | 57648 |
{
"text": [
"TiO2"
],
"answer_start": [
349
]
} | 10.1039/C4TA00199K | In contrast, the FeS2 nanochain network thin film only shows a slight resistance variation (around 15 kΩ) even when it is bent by up to 140°.As a preliminary demonstration of its use in flexible DSSCs, the FeS2 nanochain network thin film was deposited on a PET-ITO substrate and assembled into a DSSC device with a photoanode of an N719-sensitized TiO2 thin film on FTO glass, and the corresponding cell performance is presented in Fig. | What is photoanode? | 67496 |
{
"text": [
"8.80%"
],
"answer_start": [
44
]
} | 10.1016/j.nanoen.2016.02.010 | The cell with TiS2–G CE shows a high PCE of 8.80%, outperforming Pt (8.00%). | What is the value of PCE? | 23836 |
{
"text": [
"16.68mA/cm2"
],
"answer_start": [
164
]
} | 10.1016/j.carbon.2016.05.018 | For the DSSC with Pt/FTO electrode, the short-circuit current density (Jsc), open-circuit voltage (Voc), fill factor (FF), and power conversion efficiency (η) were 16.68mA/cm2, 0.78V, 0.70%, and 9.07%, respectively. | What is the value of Jsc? | 52515 |
{
"text": [
"TiO2"
],
"answer_start": [
114
]
} | 10.1016/j.mseb.2011.09.024 | This fact could be associated with the 1D tubular nanostructure of the TiNP and TiNT-NP samples.We synthesized 1D TiO2 nanostructures and applied them in DSCs. | What is ? | 39090 |
{
"text": [
"Au"
],
"answer_start": [
9
]
} | 10.1016/j.apsusc.2017.11.161 | Finally, Au electrode was deposited on HTM layer via thermal evaporation method to form planar PSCs. | What is electrode? | 10270 |
{
"text": [
"76.826%"
],
"answer_start": [
96
]
} | 10.1016/j.jcis.2018.12.050 | The I-V characteristics of the corresponding DSSCs are summarized in , It is confirmed that FF (76.826%) and VOC (0.712V) of Organic NC based electrodes significantly improved with the presence of acidic activator. | What is the value of FF? | 45401 |
{
"text": [
"7.10%"
],
"answer_start": [
55
]
} | 10.1016/j.mtcomm.2018.10.018 | The PCE was much lower than that of Pt CE based DSSCs (7.10%). | What is the value of PCE? | 49489 |
{
"text": [
"16.08mAcm−2"
],
"answer_start": [
52
]
} | 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.05.022 | In the DSC-24, the values of Jsc and IPCE are about 16.08mAcm−2 and 76.31%, respectively, higher than the other DSCs. | What is the value of Jsc? | 45868 |
{
"text": [
"12.2 Ω"
],
"answer_start": [
119
]
} | 10.1016/j.apsusc.2015.12.036 | Charge transfer process slowed down when further increasing Co/Zn molar ratio to 4: 6, producing a higher Rct value of 12.2 Ω. | What is the value of Rct? | 34571 |
{
"text": [
"723 mV"
],
"answer_start": [
103
]
} | 10.1016/j.electacta.2012.11.133 | VOC of the M-N electrolyte based cell increased from 675 mV in liquid electrolyte without TBP (L-N) to 723 mV approaching almost that of L-T electrolyte based cell. | What is the value of VOC? | 36494 |
{
"text": [
"100 mW/cm2"
],
"answer_start": [
183
]
} | 10.1016/j.ceramint.2010.05.027 | The photovoltaic activities of the TiO2 samples were measured by a Gamry Potentiostat Series G-300 under a xenon lamp, simulated solar illumination with Air Mass 1.5G filter (AM 1.5, 100 mW/cm2)., it was shown that the crystalline phase of the TiO2 nanocrystals formed is anatase phase. | What is the value of illumination? | 35366 |
{
"text": [
"100mW/cm2"
],
"answer_start": [
296
]
} | 10.1016/j.solener.2019.10.088 | The whole fabrication process was completed after the thermal evaporation of 10nm BCP and 100nm Ag on top of the PCBM layer under the high vacuum of 4×10−4 Pa.The characteristic curves of current density vs voltage (J-V) of the perovskite solar cells were tested under the illumination of 1 sun (100mW/cm2) on a solar cell testing system consisting of a computer-programmed sourcemeter (Keithley 2400) and a solar simulator (AM 1.5G, Newport), with the light density of 100mW/cm2 calibrated by a standard Si photodiode. | What is the value of illumination? | 5352 |
{
"text": [
"ITO"
],
"answer_start": [
64
]
} | 10.1016/j.jallcom.2015.01.295 | Aluminum doped zinc oxide (AZO) seed layer was sputtered on the ITO glass substrate by radio frequency sputtering. | What is substrate? | 58581 |
{
"text": [
"3.3%"
],
"answer_start": [
193
]
} | 10.1039/C2TA00418F | Our ss-DSSC-NSs showed far superior PCE (7.6%), open circuit voltage (VOC, 765 mV), short-circuit current (JSC, 13.9 mA cm−2), and fill factor (FF, 71.6%) compared to conventional ss-DSSC-NPs (3.3%) and ss-DSSC-P25 (6.8%) under AM 1.5 G one sun illumination. | What is the value of PCE? | 71439 |
{
"text": [
"I−/I3−"
],
"answer_start": [
196
]
} | 10.1039/C5NR08319B | S3 and S4).According to the energy levels of the excited states (5S2, 5F4), which are higher than the level of the TiO2 conduction band and its ground state energy level is lower than that of the I−/I3− redox couple (See Fig. | What is redox couple? | 75414 |
{
"text": [
"glass"
],
"answer_start": [
40
]
} | 10.1016/j.electacta.2009.11.067 | The poor contact between film layer and glass substrate might lead to the high resistance and low conversion efficiency c. | What is substrate? | 40861 |
{
"text": [
"0.606V"
],
"answer_start": [
86
]
} | 10.1016/j.dyepig.2013.10.032 | Under the same conditions, DSSCs based on PRSCN2 exhibited Jsc of 15.86mAcm−2, Voc of 0.606V, and ff of 62.87%, corresponding to η of 6.04%. | What is the value of Voc? | 30360 |
{
"text": [
"8.72%"
],
"answer_start": [
57
]
} | 10.1039/C1EE01071A | Excellent DSSC performance has been obtained with up to ∼8.72% power conversion efficiency (PCE), and important parameters that influence cell performance have been identified.All solvents and reagents, unless otherwise stated, were of analytically pure quality and used as received. | What is the value of PCE? | 61877 |
{
"text": [
"7.01%"
],
"answer_start": [
82
]
} | 10.1039/C8RA02668H | The PPG4 CE-based DSSCs exhibited Jsc, Voc, and FF of 13.64 mA cm−2, 0.92 V, and 67.01%, respectively, with PCE of 8.33%, whereas the Pt CE-based DSSCs exhibited Jsc, Voc, and FF of 13.27 mA cm−2, 0.92 V, and 65.52%, respectively, with PCE of 7.99%. | What is the value of PCE? | 69642 |
{
"text": [
"FTO"
],
"answer_start": [
173
]
} | 10.1016/j.synthmet.2016.04.009 | This also suggests that the multi-anchored dyes retarded backward electron transfer from TiO2 to the electrolyte and facilitated forward electron transport from TiO2 to the FTO substrate.The open-circuit photo voltage decay (OCVD) curves were also measured to confirm the electron lifetimes of the samples . | What is substrate? | 28312 |
{
"text": [
"0.632V"
],
"answer_start": [
369
]
} | 10.1016/j.solener.2018.07.048 | Therefore, the larger Rct suggests that an efficient hindrance of electron recombination between injected electrons and electron acceptors in the redox electrolyte, I3−, and higher photovoltage (a, the order of Rct values is FBV (87.3Ω)<RBV (132.6Ω)<FPA (208.1Ω)<SPA (269.3Ω), which is consistent well with the VOC values of FBV (0.574V)<RBV (0.583V)<FPA (0.608V)<SPA (0.632V). | What is the value of VOC? | 28253 |
{
"text": [
"0.036%"
],
"answer_start": [
29
]
} | 10.1016/j.dyepig.2019.02.044 | The next best performance (η=0.036%) comes from the other phenyl pyridyl, bis-acceptor structure 5, which has both lower Jsc and lower Voc than 2, and weaker IPCE across the spectrum from 400 to 700nm. | What is the value of η? | 24915 |
{
"text": [
"7.5%"
],
"answer_start": [
212
]
} | 10.1039/C4TA03451A | However, when the two rigid D–π–A branches are connected, the DSSC device incorporating a double branched dye isomer gives a dramatically improved η of 8.1% for D1 (Jsc = 14.83 mA cm−2, Voc = 755 mV, FF = 0.72), 7.5% for D2 (Jsc = 13.21 mA cm−2, Voc = 756 mV, FF = 0.75), and 6.6% for D3 (Jsc = 12.00 mA cm−2, Voc = 752 mV, FF = 0.73). | What is the value of η? | 68999 |
{
"text": [
"0.60V"
],
"answer_start": [
124
]
} | 10.1016/j.dyepig.2017.01.026 | After replacing BT with DPP as the auxiliary acceptor, D3 exhibited higher PCE of 4.69% with a Jsc of 12.07mAcm−2, a Voc of 0.60V, and a FF of 0.64. | What is the value of Voc? | 49992 |
{
"text": [
"0.93 V"
],
"answer_start": [
182
]
} | 10.1039/C9NJ02074H | The incorporation of bare CNT components into the CH3NH3PbI3 layers decreased the photovoltaic features and therefore the system efficacy, i.e., Jsc = 15.66 mA cm−2, FF = 64%, Voc = 0.93 V and PCE = 9.32%. | What is the value of Voc? | 14802 |
{
"text": [
"0.05%"
],
"answer_start": [
90
]
} | 10.1016/j.jpcs.2010.08.020 | A large improvement in η was obtained, as compared to the undoped ZnO nanorod-based DSSC (0.05%). | What is the value of η? | 55167 |
{
"text": [
"6.34%"
],
"answer_start": [
40
]
} | 10.1016/j.orgel.2012.05.013 | The PCE has been further improved up to 6.34% for DSSC based on TDPP1 when DCA is incorporation in the dye solution.Supplementary data associated with this article can be found, in the online version, at | What is the value of PCE? | 43611 |
{
"text": [
"100 mW/cm2"
],
"answer_start": [
232
]
} | 10.1016/j.electacta.2015.05.115 | Specimens for TEM observation were prepared by dispersing the material powder into alcohol by an ultrasonic treatment.A 350 W xenon light source (ShangHai) was used to provide the J-V curves under an incident irradiance of AM 1.5G (100 mW/cm2) for solar cells. | What is the value of irradiance? | 44641 |
{
"text": [
"19.42 mA/cm2"
],
"answer_start": [
77
]
} | 10.1016/j.solmat.2016.08.024 | On contrast, the device with a 20 nm PbPc HTL has a JSC, VOC, FF, and PCE of 19.42 mA/cm2, 0.79 V, 0.63, and 9.66%, respectively. | What is the value of JSC? | 8656 |
{
"text": [
"5"
],
"answer_start": [
58
]
} | 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2012.06.004 | Upon the subsequent pyrolysis of the Zn(OH)F precursor at 500°C for 2h, ultralong nanoporous ZnO NB arrays were successfully obtained with every NB composed of a large amount of nanocrystals and nanopores processing preferential orientation. | What is ZnO? | 24529 |
{
"text": [
"77.90%"
],
"answer_start": [
317
]
} | 10.1016/j.jiec.2019.08.004 | The reference device exhibited an open-circuit voltage (VOC) of 0.94 V, a short-circuit current density (JSC) of 18.56 mA/cm2, a fill factor (FF) of 78.95%, and a PCE of 13.74% under the reverse scan direction, whereas under the forward scan direction, the values were as follows: VOC= 0.94 V, JSC= 18.46 mA/cm2, FF= 77.90% and PCE = 13.47%, with slight J-V curve hysteresis under both the forward and reverse scan directions. | What is the value of FF? | 11498 |
{
"text": [
"22.28mA/cm2"
],
"answer_start": [
101
]
} | 10.1016/j.arabjc.2018.04.017 | The DSSC with ESD(20)-TiO2/FTO showed an increase in Jsc and Voc, resulting in a PCE of 10.97% (Jsc =22.28mA/cm2, Voc =716mV and FF=68.79%), compared to that of the reference device with bare TiO2/FTO (PCE=9.89%, Jsc =20.36mA/cm2, Voc =698mV and FF=68.59%). | What is the value of Jsc? | 52867 |
{
"text": [
"10"
],
"answer_start": [
89
]
} | 10.1016/j.jphotochem.2011.05.021 | Concisely, this communication provides a broad insight of use of organic based indoline D102 dye as an efficient sensitizer for obtaining nearly 17.7 mA/cm2 current density with power conversion efficiency close to 5.4%, one of the competitive results than previously tested ruthenium-based sensitizers for ZnO nanoparticles-based dye cells which is attributed to increased absorption of light as a result of higher extinction coefficient of the dye. | What is ZnO? | 32831 |
{
"text": [
"639.48 mV"
],
"answer_start": [
207
]
} | 10.1039/C5NJ00569H | Under standard global air mass 1.5 solar conditions, WH-C4- and WH-C1-sensitized cells gave a short circuit photocurrent density (Jsc) of 10.07 and 12.18 mA cm−2, an open circuit voltage (Voc) of 609.81 and 639.48 mV, and a fill factor (FF) of 0.72 and 0.72, corresponding to an overall conversion efficiency (η) of 4.40% and 5.58%, respectively. | What is the value of Voc? | 72766 |
{
"text": [
"Pt"
],
"answer_start": [
174
]
} | 10.1016/j.solmat.2015.07.011 | The results of similar cells irradiated from both sides at presence of CoPC dye molecules showed low efficiencies of 0.27%, 0.22% and 0.29%, when the DSSCs were comprised of Pt, cross-linked, and PANI NFs-based CEs, respectively. | What is CE? | 41001 |
{
"text": [
"0.62 V"
],
"answer_start": [
87
]
} | 10.1039/C9CP01032G | The co-sensitized devices with DTP, i.e.N3 + DTP (η = 5.44% JSC = 14.25 mA cm−2, VOC = 0.62 V, and FF = 61.21%), and DTB, i.e.N3 + DTB (η = 5.43%, JSC = 13.13 mA cm−2, VOC = 0.61 V, and FF = 67.94%), showed a slightly higher PCE than the N3 dye alone (η = 5.39%, JSC = 14.39 mA cm−2, VOC = 0.60 V, and FF = 61.98%) whereas with DTNi.e., N3 + DTN (η = 5.32%, JSC = 14.63 mA cm−2, VOC = 0.66 V, and FF = 54.80%), it showed a lower PCE. | What is the value of VOC? | 69946 |
{
"text": [
"50%"
],
"answer_start": [
215
]
} | 10.1039/C7NR09657G | With 4% Sb3+ doping, the performance is considerably improved, with a Voc of 0.73 V, a Jsc of 14.64 mA cm−2, a FF of 48% and a PCE of 5.18% for the forward scan, and a Voc of 0.73 V, a Jsc of 14.65 mA cm−2, a FF of 50% and a PCE of 5.31% for the reverse scan. | What is the value of FF? | 13789 |
{
"text": [
"16.38%"
],
"answer_start": [
14
]
} | 10.1039/C8NR06095A | A high PCE of 16.38% can be realized in the CT based bifacial perovskite solar cells when illuminated from the FTO side. | What is the value of PCE? | 19904 |
{
"text": [
"5 mm2"
],
"answer_start": [
20
]
} | 10.1039/C5CP07921G | A black mask of 5 × 5 mm2 was used during the IV-measurements to avoid additional contribution from light hitting outside of the active area of the solar cell.Electron lifetime measurements were conducted in a darkened cabinet, the “tool-box”, using a white LED (Luxeon Star 1 W) as a light source. | What is the value of active area? | 61818 |
{
"text": [
"8.82%"
],
"answer_start": [
79
]
} | 10.1016/S1872-2067(19)63361-9 | Photoelectrical measurements revealed that Pod(N)-FeNi exhibited a higher PCE (8.82%) than Pod-Fe (6.12%) and CNTs (4.87%), and even outperformed platinum (8.02% PCE). | What is the value of PCE? | 36847 |
{
"text": [
"0.17 V"
],
"answer_start": [
131
]
} | 10.1039/C8NR07554A | Bae and co-workers reported a DSSC with ZnO NWs-graphene sheet with Jsc, Voc, FF and energy conversion efficiency of 0.35 mA cm−2, 0.17 V, 0.39 and 0.02%, respectively. | What is the value of Voc? | 76705 |
{
"text": [
"FTO"
],
"answer_start": [
150
]
} | 10.1016/j.renene.2012.11.017 | This was because of the fact that larger agglomerates in the opaque TiO2 film scattered the incident light too much within first few layers (near the FTO substrate) of the film and did not allow much light to reach the layers away from substrate. | What is substrate? | 30052 |
{
"text": [
"6.72%"
],
"answer_start": [
186
]
} | 10.1039/C1JM10201J | Although both DPTP and OMeDPTPcells possess Jsc similar to (or even slightly higher than) that of the OHexDPTPcell, yet with relatively lower Voc, they both exhibit inferior η values of 6.72% and 7.05%, respectively. | What is the value of η? | 76027 |
{
"text": [
"0.2 Sun"
],
"answer_start": [
98
]
} | 10.1039/C4TA00563E | 4(a) shows representative current–voltage characteristics of the devices measured under 1 Sun and 0.2 Sun illumination, and the average values of photovoltaic parameters are summarized in Table 2. | What is the value of illumination? | 68844 |
{
"text": [
"12.42%"
],
"answer_start": [
56
]
} | 10.1039/C6TA10588B | The PCE of our flexible device was 22% lower than that (12.42%) of the rigid device. | What is the value of PCE? | 15535 |
{
"text": [
"4.1%"
],
"answer_start": [
263
]
} | 10.1016/j.solmat.2007.04.030 | Corresponding photovoltaic parameters are summarized in , which shows the maximum solar energy conversion efficiency (η) of 4.5%, Jsc of 11.65 mA cm−2, Voc of 0.65 V and fill factor of 0.60 for 20% of APS in the hybrid gel; this conversion efficiency exceeds the 4.1% efficiency of the reference cell. | What is the value of η? | 45708 |
{
"text": [
"16.35mAcm−2"
],
"answer_start": [
83
]
} | 10.1016/j.solmat.2018.03.026 | The DSSC consisting of NiS/rGO nanohybrid CE gives a PCE of 9.5% (Voc =0.75V, Jsc =16.35mAcm−2, FF=0.78). | What is the value of Jsc? | 55836 |
{
"text": [
"7.95%"
],
"answer_start": [
174
]
} | 10.1039/C8TC00611C | The QSDSSC device based on the Ni0.12Co0.80Se CE yields a remarkable PCE of 8.61%, which is higher than those obtained for the devices based on binary CoSe (8.01%) and NiSe (7.95%) CE and that of the Pt control (7.82%). | What is the value of PCE? | 64823 |
{
"text": [
"20 days"
],
"answer_start": [
21
]
} | 10.1039/B927336K | S6 for the sample at 20 days of reaction time), and the powder XRD pattern is consistent with that of β-CuSCN (See Fig. | What is the value of time? | 64610 |
{
"text": [
"FTO"
],
"answer_start": [
51
]
} | 10.1016/j.solmat.2008.09.038 | The counter-electrode was made of the Pt-sputtered FTO glass substrate. | What is substrate? | 48633 |
{
"text": [
"TiO2"
],
"answer_start": [
95
]
} | 10.1039/C4EE03773A | The optimized device can be seen to be clearly composed of a 450 nm thick dense and mesoporous TiO2 layer infiltrated with perovskite on FTO, a 210 nm PST1 layer, and an 80 nm thermally evaporated Au layer as the back contact.For comparison, the photovoltaic measurement of perovskite solar cells fabricated with the commercial spiro-OMeTAD as HTM was also performed under similar conditions. | What is FTO? | 12612 |
{
"text": [
"0.69 V"
],
"answer_start": [
109
]
} | 10.1016/j.cej.2017.04.066 | The corresponding photovoltaic parameters (Voc, Jsc, FF, and η) of the DSC based on Pt counter electrode are 0.69 V, 16.33 mA cm−2, 0.66, and 7.43%, respectively. | What is the value of Voc? | 52736 |
{
"text": [
"0.74V"
],
"answer_start": [
82
]
} | 10.1016/j.apsusc.2018.01.264 | The cell with bare Ag CE exhibits a η of 3.89%, with a JSC of 10.77mAcm−2, VOC of 0.74V, and FF of 48.81%. | What is the value of VOC? | 47516 |
{
"text": [
"8.04%"
],
"answer_start": [
107
]
} | 10.1016/j.tet.2011.09.008 | And the corresponding overall conversion efficiency (η) is 5.56%, which reaches ∼70% of a N719-based DSSC (8.04%) fabricated and measured under the same conditions. | What is the value of η? | 42821 |
{
"text": [
"41.4%"
],
"answer_start": [
141
]
} | 10.1039/C4RA06823H | In terms of η, the best performing DSCs after 7 days are those with iodo-dye [Cu(1)(5)]+ which show power conversion efficiencies of 40.2 or 41.4% with respect to N719 set at 100%. | What is the value of η? | 75601 |
{
"text": [
"CH3NH3PbI3"
],
"answer_start": [
0
]
} | 10.1016/j.rser.2017.09.095 | CH3NH3PbI3, CH3NH3SnI3, CH3NH3Pb1−xSnxI3, CH3NH3PbCl1−xIx) have unique properties such as low bandgap, high absorption coefficient, good carrier mobility and low defect density Eventually, degradation of perovskite in the liquid electrolyte was overcome by all-solid-state-PSC, which used spiroOMeTAD as hole transport material (HTM) layer Apart from energy conversion efficiencies, stability and economic processing of the PSCs play vital roles. | What is perovskite? | 389 |
{
"text": [
"I−/I3−"
],
"answer_start": [
182
]
} | 10.1016/j.photonics.2015.08.003 | Then, DSSCs were fabricated employing the sensitized hybrid anode, platinum deposited counter electrode (Plasticol T, Solaronix), 60 μm sealing spacer (Meltonix 1170, Solaronix) and I−/I3− redox couple electrolyte prepared in methoxypropionitrile with a 50 mM redox concentration (Iodolyte Z-50, Solaronix).The visible spectra of Z907 in methanol and adsorbed on TiO2 films at glass substrates were recorded with JASCO-670 UV/VIS spectrophotometer. | What is redox couple? | 44091 |
{
"text": [
"790 mV"
],
"answer_start": [
165
]
} | 10.1016/j.synthmet.2015.12.015 | Most importantly, the impressive performance of the GVNBs based cell was observed with the power conversion efficiency (PCE) of 6.17%, open circuit voltage (Voc) of 790 mV, short circuit current density (Jsc) of 14.2 mA cm−2, and fill factor (FF) of 0.69. | What is the value of Voc? | 29614 |
{
"text": [
"TiO2"
],
"answer_start": [
59
]
} | 10.1016/j.solener.2017.06.062 | We hope that this integrative method can be applied in the TiO2 photoanodes and to prepare non-cFTO DSCs. | What is photoanodes? | 36250 |
{
"text": [
"6.81%"
],
"answer_start": [
42
]
} | 10.1016/j.dyepig.2017.01.014 | The Z887 sensitized cell exhibited PCE of 6.81% (Jsc=13.84mAcm−2, Voc=726.79mV, and FF=0.68). | What is the value of PCE? | 27351 |
{
"text": [
"12.9mA/cm2"
],
"answer_start": [
75
]
} | 10.1016/j.solener.2017.11.070 | CL-OMe showed a greater power conversion efficiency of 5.50% with a Jsc of 12.9mA/cm2, Voc of 0.73V and FF of 57.99%. | What is the value of Jsc? | 38727 |
{
"text": [
"12.40%"
],
"answer_start": [
64
]
} | 10.1039/C8TA10975C | The OSC based on PM6 and IDT6CN-TM achieved a high PCE of up to 12.40% along with a VOC of 0.953 V, a JSC of 17.40 mA cm−2 and a FF of 74.7%. | What is the value of PCE? | 18050 |
{
"text": [
"TiO2"
],
"answer_start": [
184
]
} | 10.1039/C3TA11485F | After treatment in the UV-O3 system for 18 min, a drop of 5 × 10−3 M solution of H2PtCl6 in EtOH was added and the thermal treatment at 400 °C for 15 min was repeated.The dye adsorbed TiO2electrode and Pt-counter electrode were assembled into a sealed sandwich-type cell by heating with a hot-melt ionomer-class resin (Surlyn 25 μm thickness) as a spacer between the electrodes. | What is ? | 74305 |
{
"text": [
"100mW/cm2"
],
"answer_start": [
81
]
} | 10.1016/j.apsusc.2018.09.080 | shows the J-V curve of the PSC based on ZnO@TiO2 NRs prepared under RH 40% under 100mW/cm2 of AM 1.5 illumination. | What is the value of illumination? | 1524 |
{
"text": [
"18.26mAcm−2"
],
"answer_start": [
101
]
} | 10.1016/j.apsusc.2018.08.078 | In comparison, the maximum PCE of hybrid carbon based PSCs was 11.28% with a VOC of 0.98V and JSC of 18.26mAcm−2, that the photovoltaic performance was slightly improved. | What is the value of JSC? | 9254 |
{
"text": [
"12.59%"
],
"answer_start": [
204
]
} | 10.1039/C6TA06152D | The control device based on pristine CH3NH3PbIxCl3−x has a short-circuit current density (Jsc) of 18.67 mA cm−2, an open-circuit voltage (Voc) of 0.95 V, a fill factor (FF) of 71%, and a resulting PCE of 12.59%, which are comparable with previously reported values. | What is the value of PCE? | 14434 |
{
"text": [
"13.5%"
],
"answer_start": [
53
]
} | 10.1039/C6TA06987H | However, devices with doped HTM 43 achieved a PCE of 13.5%, which was lower than devices with doped HTM Sp01 (PCE = 15.2%). | What is the value of PCE? | 12943 |
{
"text": [
"1.78%"
],
"answer_start": [
40
]
} | 10.1016/j.solener.2017.03.059 | As shown in b, compare to the rear η of 1.78% for the DSSC based pure PANi CE and 2.44% from a pristine Pt-based cell, a higher rear η of 3.40% is recorded for the DSSC with PANi-6 wt‰ MoS2 complex CE. | What is the value of η? | 56850 |
{
"text": [
"I3−/I−"
],
"answer_start": [
115
]
} | 10.1016/j.ssi.2019.01.006 | This suggest that the DSSC assembled with the polymeric electrolyte with Fe2O3 as filler has well encapsulation of I3−/I− redox couple in the polymer matrix which promote significant interfacial contact between the Pt counter electrode and dye adsorbed TiO2 photo-anode. | What is redox couple? | 56501 |
{
"text": [
"716 mV"
],
"answer_start": [
197
]
} | 10.1039/C8TC00610E | 5 and the photovoltaic parameters are summarized in Table 2.It is obvious that XW29 and XW31 featuring the ethynylbenzoic acid acceptor afforded high efficiencies exceeding 10%, with Voc values of 716 mV and 720 mV, and Jsc values of 21.26 mA cm−2 and 22.06 mA cm−2, respectively. | What is the value of Voc? | 69958 |
{
"text": [
"18.11%"
],
"answer_start": [
159
]
} | 10.1016/j.spmi.2018.03.051 | When the Y/Ti molar ratios in the hydrothermal grown solutions increased from 3% to 5%, the Jsc, Voc, FF and PCE decreased from 22.50mAcm−2, 1.06V, 76.16% and 18.11% to 22.32mAcm−2, 1.05V, 73.40% and 17.09%. | What is the value of PCE? | 1565 |
{
"text": [
"0.53V"
],
"answer_start": [
94
]
} | 10.1016/j.electacta.2018.09.063 | The Jsc, Voc, and FF of the QDSC fabricated with NSGPCS/Ti counter electrode are 16.58mAcm−2, 0.53V, and 0.60, respectively, yielding a η of 5.27%, which is comparable to the efficiency of the QDSC fabricated with PbS counter electrode. | What is the value of Voc? | 54340 |
{
"text": [
"9.47 Ωcm2"
],
"answer_start": [
85
]
} | 10.1016/j.jiec.2018.04.043 | The Rct value of the L-Pt/rGO-550 (3.86 Ωcm2) is lower than that of the rGO-550 CEs (9.47 Ωcm2) because the large Pt NPs, as a synergetic effect of the nanocomposite responsible for the improved electrochemical property, act as not only a point of connection in the L-Pt/rGO for reducing the sheet resistance but also superior active sites for I3− reduction . | What is the value of Rct? | 59651 |
{
"text": [
"17.04%"
],
"answer_start": [
66
]
} | 10.1039/C9DT00930B | S1 and Table 1 demonstrate that the control device shows a PCE of 17.04%, with Jsc = 21.59 mA cm−2, Voc = 1.07 V and FF = 73.62% in forward scanning. | What is the value of PCE? | 18685 |
{
"text": [
"1.01 V"
],
"answer_start": [
115
]
} | 10.1039/C7NR03963H | A further increase in the cycles of the FrGOs began to lower the PCE of the PeSC with the PEDOT + FrGO5: an VOC of 1.01 V, a JSC of 18.2 mA cm−2, a FF of 70.7%, and a PCE of 13.0%. | What is the value of VOC? | 17444 |
{
"text": [
"TiO2"
],
"answer_start": [
26
]
} | 10.1016/j.solener.2016.10.003 | Moreover, the low cost Zr/TiO2 ink is also presented as a feasible alternative ETL candidate for planar PSCs, which possesses high potential for the printing compatible PSC fabrication.Supplementary data associated with this article can be found, in the online version, at | What is ETL? | 10953 |
{
"text": [
"64.8%"
],
"answer_start": [
159
]
} | 10.1039/C4CP05398B | For comparison, for the control photo-anode (electrode 1, TiO2) fabricated using only TiO2, the values of Jsc (13.8 mA cm−2), Voc (0.691 V), η (6.19%) and FF (64.8%) were obtained. | What is the value of FF? | 66808 |
{
"text": [
"7.57%"
],
"answer_start": [
287
]
} | 10.1039/C1CC10638D | The DSC using WO2 as a CE shows photovoltaic parameters of open-circuit voltage at (Voc) = 808 mV, short-circuit current density at (Jsc) = 14.02 mA cm−2, fill factor (FF) = 0.64 and an energy conversion efficiency (η) = 7.25%, reaching 95% of the level that the DSC using Pt CE yields (7.57%). | What is the value of η? | 75198 |
{
"text": [
"TiO2"
],
"answer_start": [
108
]
} | 10.1039/C5RA10702D | These results supports that the addition of proper content of GO could enhances the charge transport at the TiO2/electrolyte interface, as well as the enhancement of transport of I−/I3− ions in the electrolyte.Intensity-modulated photocurrent spectroscopy (IMPS) and photovoltage spectroscopy (IMVS) measurements were conducted to further investigate the GO content effect on the electron transport and charge recombination in the DSSCs, and the IMPS (Fig. | What is ? | 71266 |
{
"text": [
"6.84%"
],
"answer_start": [
27
]
} | 10.1016/j.solener.2017.02.025 | The PCE value of NCO NR is 6.84%, which up to 84% of the Pt. | What is the value of PCE? | 49772 |
{
"text": [
"6.02%"
],
"answer_start": [
307
]
} | 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.12.143 | Under the same condition, the quasi-solid-state DSSCs based on sensitizer FNE58 provided a Jsc of 9.08mAcm−2, a Voc of 628mV, and an FF of 0.70, corresponding to a PCE of 3.99%, while FNE59 based quasi-solid-state DSSC gave a Jsc of 12.06mAcm−2, a Voc of 703mV, and an FF of 0.71, corresponding to a PCE of 6.02%. | What is the value of PCE? | 54576 |
{
"text": [
"61.9%"
],
"answer_start": [
130
]
} | 10.1039/C8RA01532E | In the control device incorporating pristine PC61BM, the mean values of Voc and Jsc and the FF and PCE were 0.99 V, 17.2 mA cm−2, 61.9%, and 10.2%, respectively (PCEmax = 10.6%). | What is the value of FF? | 17494 |
{
"text": [
"0.25 cm2"
],
"answer_start": [
48
]
} | 10.1016/j.jphotochem.2016.07.021 | The active area of the solar cells was fixed at 0.25 cm2.Complete DSC devices were tested under a solar simulator (SUN 2000, Abet Technologies, USA) at 1000 W m−2 (1 sun) AM 1.5 G illumination (calibrated with a standard silicon cell), the same test was performed at 400 W m−2 (0.4 sun) illumination, further reduction of the incident light intensity did not promote any performance improvement. | What is the value of active area? | 55094 |
{
"text": [
"21.59mA/cm2"
],
"answer_start": [
169
]
} | 10.1016/j.orgel.2018.03.042 | An excellent PCE of 18.14% is achieved in CH3NH3PbI3-xClx-ICBA-based solar cells, with an open-circuit voltage (VOC) of 1088mV, a short-circuit current density (JSC) of 21.59mA/cm2, and fill factor (FF) of 0.77. | What is the value of JSC? | 3347 |
{
"text": [
"1000 W/m2"
],
"answer_start": [
32
]
} | 10.1016/j.solmat.2010.03.011 | Light intensity was adjusted at 1000 W/m2 with a bolometric Zipp & Konen CM-4 pyranometer. | What is the value of Light intensity? | 25239 |
{
"text": [
"6.90%"
],
"answer_start": [
118
]
} | 10.1016/j.electacta.2017.05.124 | Without optimizing the photoanode, the Pt-based DSSC exhibits Voc of 0.76 V,Jsc of 14.17 mA cm−2, FF of 63%, and η of 6.90%. | What is the value of η? | 43118 |
{
"text": [
"89mW/cm2"
],
"answer_start": [
73
]
} | 10.1016/j.solener.2018.02.061 | (a) shows the J-V curve of the fabricated DSSCs under AM 1.5 spectra and 89mW/cm2 illumination. | What is the value of illumination? | 57212 |
{
"text": [
"3.00%"
],
"answer_start": [
95
]
} | 10.1039/C0DT01043J | The power conversion efficiency (η) of 1-, 2-, 3- and 4-sensitized solar cells are moderate at 3.00%, 2.51%, 2.00% and 2.03%, respectively (vs. | What is the value of η? | 60491 |
{
"text": [
"1.030±0.020V"
],
"answer_start": [
49
]
} | 10.1016/j.orgel.2018.02.027 | The HMe2Pc-based devices exhibited higher VOC of 1.030±0.020V, higher JSC of 20.90±0.32mA/cm2, slightly lower FF of 68.0±2.6%, and higher PCE of 14.53±0.69%, compared with those of ZnMe2Pc with a VOC of 0.985±0.014V, JSC of 20.81±0.28mA/cm2, FF of 68.5±1.3%, and PCE of 14.06±0.40%. | What is the value of VOC? | 11865 |
{
"text": [
"7.72%"
],
"answer_start": [
226
]
} | 10.1016/j.electacta.2015.01.214 | The different deposition times make CoS counter electrodes have different thicknesses and different JSC and PCE values for DSSCs, and the DSSC based on CoS-4AB counter electrode has the highest JSC of 16.50 mA cm−2 and PCE of 7.72% (The acid or/and base treatment of the counter electrode has large significant effect on photovoltaic performance of the DSSCs. | What is the value of PCE? | 26490 |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.