answers
dict | title
stringlengths 16
40
| context
stringlengths 13
1.96k
| question
stringclasses 124
values | id
stringlengths 1
5
|
---|---|---|---|---|
{
"text": [
"23.14mAcm−2"
],
"answer_start": [
125
]
} | 10.1016/j.apsusc.2019.04.226 | In contrast, by replacing the undoped Li(Gd,Y)F4 NCs with doped Li(Gd,Y)F4 UCNCs, the mean JSC increased from 22.37mAcm−2 to 23.14mAcm−2 and FF from 68.77% to 72.07%. | What is the value of JSC? | 2814 |
{
"text": [
"6.02%"
],
"answer_start": [
215
]
} | 10.1016/j.jpcs.2019.01.008 | The PSCs with the CZTS layer of 97nm in thickness (i.e., n=1) show a peak photovoltaic performance, from which we get the best device with Jsc=9.70mA/cm2, Voc=0.82V, FF=76.10% and power conversion efficiency (η) of 6.02% (). | What is the value of η? | 805 |
{
"text": [
"5.11%"
],
"answer_start": [
58
]
} | 10.1016/j.solener.2017.08.009 | The PSCs made on the co-modified HTL has a maximum PCE of 5.11%, which shows 293%, 152%, and 38% improvements in contrast to the values of the devices based on the pristine PEDOT:PSS (1.30%), DMSO-PEDOT:PSS (2.03%), and CB-PEDOT:PSS (3.69%) HTL, respectively. | What is the value of PCE? | 1234 |
{
"text": [
"13.94%"
],
"answer_start": [
49
]
} | 10.1016/j.jallcom.2018.02.136 | The best PCEs, achieved when Ln=2, are 13.35 and 13.94% for forward and reverse scans, respectively. | What is the value of PCE? | 7702 |
{
"text": [
"triiodide/iodide"
],
"answer_start": [
415
]
} | 10.1039/C1CC10638D | With EIS results, the change tendency of J0 on WO2, WO3 and Pt electrodes surfaces is generally in accordance with those obtained in Tafel-curve plots.WhereR is the gas constant, T is the temperature, F is Faraday's constant, n is the number of electrons involved in the reduction of triiodide at the electrode, and Rct is the charge transfer resistance.The Jlim is determined by the diffusion of the redox couple (triiodide/iodide) in the electrolyte. | What is redox couple? | 75200 |
{
"text": [
"0.71 V"
],
"answer_start": [
294
]
} | 10.1039/C7SE00192D | It is found that the device without graphene exhibited an η value of 5.45% (with Jsc = 12.63 mA cm−2, Voc = 0.69 V, and FF = 0.62), and the GR-1 and GR-2 devices based on the constructed TiO2 films with a gradient graphene content exhibited an η value of 6.82% (with Jsc = 15.54 mA cm−2, Voc = 0.71 V, and FF = 0.62) and 7.71% (with Jsc = 17.11 mA cm−2, Voc = 0.72 V, and FF = 0.63), respectively. | What is the value of Voc? | 74080 |
{
"text": [
"TiO2"
],
"answer_start": [
339
]
} | 10.1039/C8EE01101J | The C60 layer was deposited from a C60 solution (10 mg ml−1) in 1,2-dichlorobenzene by spin-coating at 3000 rpm, followed by thermal annealing at 100 °C for 10 min.For the MAPbI3 film, a 1.4 M solution of PbI2 and MAI (1:1 molar ratio) in dimethylformamide (DMF) and dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) at a volume ratio of 9:1 was deposited on the TiO2/FTO substrate by spin-coating, and then 0.1 ml of toluene was dropped on the rotating substrate. | What is FTO? | 13159 |
{
"text": [
"6.77%"
],
"answer_start": [
188
]
} | 10.1016/j.materresbull.2017.12.031 | It could be seen that the Pt CE based DSSCs had a PCE of 7.56%, where Jsc was 14.90 mAcm−2, Voc was 779mV, and FF was 0.65; while the PCE of the synthesized PEDOT CE based device was only 6.77%, where Jsc was 13.79mAcm−2, Voc was 775 mV, FF was 0.63. | What is the value of PCE? | 38742 |
{
"text": [
"35.7 A/m2"
],
"answer_start": [
162
]
} | 10.1016/j.physb.2010.03.041 | The short circuit current density (JSC) and open circuit voltage (VOC) of the DSSCs composed of annealed ZnO nanorods in N2/H2 were 47.9 A/m2 and 0.47 V, whereas 35.7 A/m2 and 0.41 V were obtained when the nanorods and seed layer were not annealed. | What is the value of JSC? | 51708 |
{
"text": [
"16.57%"
],
"answer_start": [
106
]
} | 10.1039/C7TC02954C | We found performance of the CH3NH3PbI3−xClx-based device with 0.3 mg mL−1 of PVP achieved a summit PCE of 16.57%, which demonstrated a 23.9% increase compared with a PCE of 13.37% of the control device. | What is the value of PCE? | 13873 |
{
"text": [
"100 mW/cm2"
],
"answer_start": [
81
]
} | 10.1016/j.electacta.2016.07.092 | The performance of the fabricated cells was evaluated under AM 1.5 illumination (100 mW/cm2) with an active area of 0.25 cm2.(a) and S3 show the surface morphologies of the TiO2 NTs obtained through two-step anodization. | What is the value of illumination? | 46457 |
{
"text": [
"100mWcm-2"
],
"answer_start": [
46
]
} | 10.1016/j.solmat.2006.02.012 | It was possible to achieve an illumination of 100mWcm-2±5% over the entire solar cell module area. | What is the value of illumination? | 59433 |
{
"text": [
"5.5 ± 0.3%"
],
"answer_start": [
170
]
} | 10.1016/j.solener.2014.07.020 | By using a multi-layered photoelectrode (η= 7.0 ± 0.3%), a 27% enhancement in conversion efficiency is realized in DSSC as compared with pristine P25-TiO2 photoanode (η= 5.5 ± 0.3%) of identical thickness.To confirm the role of the TiO2 blocking layer, the dark J–V characteristics of the above cells were compared in . | What is the value of η? | 47975 |
{
"text": [
"9.3%"
],
"answer_start": [
67
]
} | 10.1039/C8TA02281J | Surprisingly, compared with the reported porphyrin dye XW11 (PCE = 9.3%), only XW28 achieved a high efficiency of 10.14%, and XW26 and XW27 showed moderate efficiencies of 5.57% and 7.17%, respectively. | What is the value of PCE? | 67082 |
{
"text": [
"0.36%"
],
"answer_start": [
90
]
} | 10.1016/j.poly.2014.11.008 | It was observed that the sensitizers S1 and S2 exhibit power conversion efficiency (η) of 0.36% and 0.42% respectively, whereas N719 exhibits η of 3.6% under similar conditions. | What is the value of η? | 44668 |
{
"text": [
"6.97%"
],
"answer_start": [
132
]
} | 10.1016/j.electacta.2016.05.175 | The Co-1 co-sensitized device yielded the best PCE of 8.12%, which was 16.50% greater than that of the device containing only N719 (6.97%). | What is the value of PCE? | 40910 |
{
"text": [
"0.982 V"
],
"answer_start": [
77
]
} | 10.1039/C7RA10677G | The devices with PTZ-TPA showed a slightly lower open circuit voltage (Voc = 0.982 V) than the devices employing Spiro-MeOTAD (Voc = 1.03 V). | What is the value of Voc? | 21983 |
{
"text": [
"7.59%"
],
"answer_start": [
46
]
} | 10.1039/C7CC09671B | As expected, XW8 exhibited the highest PCE of 7.59% among these dyes.Since the breakthrough of YD2-o-C8, three years later in 2014, a record PCE of ca. | What is the value of PCE? | 72375 |
{
"text": [
"6.73%"
],
"answer_start": [
111
]
} | 10.1016/j.solener.2018.12.037 | Therefore, the PCE of the DSC based on Co-Ni-Se-1:1 CE is up to 7.38%, higher than that of the DSC with Pt CE (6.73%). | What is the value of PCE? | 53095 |
{
"text": [
"FTO"
],
"answer_start": [
76
]
} | 10.1016/j.dyepig.2019.01.027 | The Pt counter electrode was obtained by casting platinum paste solution on FTO substrate []. | What is substrate? | 31618 |
{
"text": [
"0.701V"
],
"answer_start": [
134
]
} | 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2017.02.026 | In case of RC-36, with the moderate electron-donating N,N-dibenzyl-aniline group, the device gave a high JSC of 18.84mAcm−2, a VOC of 0.701V, and yielding a PCE value of 9.77%. | What is the value of VOC? | 27187 |
{
"text": [
"5.60%"
],
"answer_start": [
173
]
} | 10.1039/C5TA05522A | When used as a CE in DSSCs, PANI-CND CEs exhibit a superior power conversion efficiency (η = 7.45%) to those of conventional platinum (η = 7.37%) and pristine PANI CEs (η = 5.60%).In dye-sensitized solar cell (DSSC) systems, the platinum (Pt)-based counter electrode (CE) is one of the major hurdles for large-scale production of DSSCs owing to the high cost and scarce resources of Pt. | What is the value of η? | 73460 |
{
"text": [
"8.19%"
],
"answer_start": [
140
]
} | 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2019.227121 | In detail, the PCEs of these cells are in the order of MoS2/Ni-CoSx (1/1) (9.80%)>MoS2/Ni-CoSx (2/1) (8.78%)>MoS2/Ni-CoSx (1/2) (8.51%)>Pt (8.19%)>Ni-CoSx (7.12%)>MoS2 (6.39%). | What is the value of PCE? | 49637 |
{
"text": [
"Au"
],
"answer_start": [
383
]
} | 10.1016/j.solmat.2016.05.004 | That is to say, the interface connection between the perovskite layer and the mesoporous TiO2 can be effectively improved by surface modification, which should be attributed to the high structural and chemical affinity among the CH3NH3PbI3/SrTiO3/TiO2 system.The perovskite solar cells with the structure of FTO/ compact TiO2/modified or bare mesoporous TiO2/CH3NH3PbI3/spiro-OMeTAD/Au were fabricated and their photovoltaic properties have been studied. | What is FTO? | 7742 |
{
"text": [
"6.52%"
],
"answer_start": [
123
]
} | 10.1016/j.ceramint.2019.05.068 | The PCE of DSSCs with Bi/Mo2C/MC CEs reached 8.06%, which was much higher than those of DSSCs with Mo2C/MC (7.29%) and MC (6.52%) CEs, and increased by 13.8% versus Pt CE (7.08%). | What is the value of PCE? | 26561 |
{
"text": [
"7.15%"
],
"answer_start": [
133
]
} | 10.1039/C6CS00752J | The PANI CE exhibited higher electrocatalytic performance for the I3−/I− redox reaction than the Pt electrode, and achieved a PCE of 7.15%, over 0.25% higher than the PCE value of the Pt-based CE.One-dimensional PANI nanostructures with different morphologies, like nanofibers, nanobelts, and nanotubes, have been synthesized. | What is the value of PCE? | 66625 |
{
"text": [
"ZnO"
],
"answer_start": [
52
]
} | 10.1016/j.jallcom.2019.07.169 | So this method is simple and low cost to synthesize ZnO/TiO2 multipod nanostructures with high yield to meet the widespread demand of these type nanostructures, such as the anodes of DSSCs, photocatalyst and other applications. | What is ? | 50876 |
{
"text": [
"100mW/cm2"
],
"answer_start": [
126
]
} | 10.1016/j.poly.2019.03.058 | The current–voltage (J–V) characteristics for the prepared DSSCs were measured using a Keithley 2400 source meter and a 1.5G (100mW/cm2) IV-5 solar simulator (Sr.# 83, PV measurements Incorporation).Sodium diisobutyldithiocarbamate (500mg, 2.20mmol) was reacted with platinum(II) chloride (300mg, 1.10mmol) in acetone as the solvent (30mL) in a two-neck flask. | What is the value of solar? | 38920 |
{
"text": [
"939.4mV"
],
"answer_start": [
118
]
} | 10.1016/j.jallcom.2017.11.081 | The optimized PSCs delivered a short-circuit photocurrent density (JSC) of 20.61mA/cm3, open-circuit voltage (Voc) of 939.4mV, fill factor of (FF) of 0.661 and overall conversion efficiency (η) of 12.80% when the thickness of BL-TiO2 was about 31nm(R=2.4). | What is the value of Voc? | 7426 |
{
"text": [
"11.17%"
],
"answer_start": [
139
]
} | 10.1016/j.solmat.2017.12.015 | By the method of adding water additives, significant improvements in JSC and VOC were achieved, which resulted in the increase of PCE from 11.17% to 14.02%. | What is the value of PCE? | 11440 |
{
"text": [
"6.10 ± 0.01%"
],
"answer_start": [
691
]
} | 10.1016/j.electacta.2014.06.075 | Similar to the dye adsorption on the TiO2 particles, these groups work as the linkers to enable the anchoring of GQDs onto TiO2 nanoparticles The UV-vis spectra of GQDs solutions in the inset of (b) shows a strong and narrow absorbance peak at the wavelength of about 320 nm, which is a commonly observed feature of GQDs The current density-voltage (J-V) characteristics curves of the DSSCs are shown in , with the increase of the contents of GQDs, the short-circuit current density(Jsc) and open-circuit voltage(Voc) of these DSSCs increased first and then decreased and obtained the optimal values in the GTP-2 DSSC with an Jsc of 14.07 ± 0.02 mA cm−2, an Voc of 0.66 ± 0.01 V and an η of 6.10 ± 0.01%, higher than those of the TP DSSC by 30.9%, 6.5% and 19.6%, respectively.Furthermore, the performance parameters of all the DSSCs were normalized and their change trends were shown in that with the increase of the GQDs content, the Jsc, Voc and η of the DSSCs increased firstly and then reduced; whereas the change trend of dye-loading A of the photoelectrodes were opposite, reduced firstly and then increased.The improvements of the properties of the DSSCs by introducing GQDs can be attributed to the hot electron injection from GQDs into TiO2 conduction band. | What is the value of η? | 30655 |
{
"text": [
"7.10%"
],
"answer_start": [
60
]
} | 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2013.05.052 | The DSCs assembled with the NiS CE achieve a maximum PCE of 7.10%, comparable to that of FTO-Pt CE (7.35%). | What is the value of PCE? | 26131 |
{
"text": [
"13.31%"
],
"answer_start": [
309
]
} | 10.1039/C8TA01617H | It can be found that Spiro PeSCs possess obviously better performance than P3HT PeSCs, with increases in short circuit density (JSC) from 20.61 mA cm−2 to 21.88 mA cm−2, open circuit voltage (VOC) from 0.99 to 1.05 V, and fill factor (FF) from 65.23% to 74.62%, leading to an overall 28% increase in PCE from 13.31% (P3HT device) to 17.08% (Spiro device). | What is the value of PCE? | 21367 |
{
"text": [
"13.85%"
],
"answer_start": [
246
]
} | 10.1039/C5TA06870C | The power conversion efficiency (PCE) of devices fabricated from DMF solution increases from 0.55% to 6.95% as the spin-coating time is decreased from 30 s to 3 s, and the PCE of devices fabricated from DMSO solution also increases from 0.22% to 13.85% as the spin-coating time is decreased from 90 s to 15 s, indicating that the device performance becomes better as the spin-coating time is decreased. | What is the value of PCE? | 17394 |
{
"text": [
"0.6 V"
],
"answer_start": [
176
]
} | 10.1016/j.poly.2014.06.004 | In particular, although the long chain hexadecyl-(triethoxy)-silane (C16) efficiently screened the TiO2 surface against electron recapture, yielding an open circuit voltage of 0.6 V, the best performances were obtained with the comparatively shorter chain APTS and TMAS co-adsorbates, resulting in photocurrents in the range of 9–10 mA/cm2 and in Voc > 0.6 V. | What is the value of Voc? | 23510 |
{
"text": [
"12.8%"
],
"answer_start": [
100
]
} | 10.1039/C5TA09661H | exploited a hole-conductor-free fully printable mesoscopic perovskite solar cell with a peak PCE of 12.8% (Table 3, AA = 7 mm2) based on the carbon counter electrode (Fig. | What is the value of PCE? | 16949 |
{
"text": [
"0.97 V"
],
"answer_start": [
28
]
} | 10.1039/C4TA05309E | The improvement of VOC from 0.97 V to 1.07 V can be explained by the better coverage of PCBM films and the resulting enhanced hole blocking ability and decreased leakage current at the interfaces between the perovskite, PCBM layer and the top electrode. | What is the value of VOC? | 21460 |
{
"text": [
"0.64V"
],
"answer_start": [
389
]
} | 10.1016/j.mseb.2017.10.008 | Concerning the influence of reaction time on the performance of counter electrodes, a series of time-dependent J-V curves are shown in and the photovoltaic parameters of tested DSSCs are listed in , both short circuit current density (Jsc) and open circuit voltage (Voc) increase quickly with increasing the reaction time from 10min to 1h, reaching the maximum values of 13.366mAcm−2 and 0.64V at 1h’s reaction time, yielding the highest photovoltaic conversion efficiency (η) of 3.34%. | What is the value of Voc? | 57038 |
{
"text": [
"1.04"
],
"answer_start": [
138
]
} | 10.1016/j.nanoen.2017.02.025 | Moreover, this buffer layer retarded the charge recombination leading to significant enhancement in VOC and FF from ~0.93 V and ~0.64 to ~1.04 V and 0.73, respectively. | What is ? | 2419 |
{
"text": [
"600 mV"
],
"answer_start": [
81
]
} | 10.1039/C3TA10587C | All samples possessed the same or similar open-circuit voltages of approximately 600 mV, by considering that the VOC was generally determined by the difference between the Fermi level of the oxide semiconductor and the redox potential of the electrolyte. | What is the value of VOC? | 60937 |
{
"text": [
"3.4%"
],
"answer_start": [
262
]
} | 10.1016/j.matchemphys.2017.09.030 | The differences in physico-chemical properties among the various materials reflects in their performances as photoanodes in DSSCs: their optical properties, porosity and defectivity deeply affect the efficiency of the devices, with η values ranging from 1.76 to 3.4%.Supplementary data related to this chapter can be found at | What is the value of η? | 42309 |
{
"text": [
"SnO2"
],
"answer_start": [
34
]
} | 10.1016/j.renene.2013.03.018 | The conductive layer of a F-doped SnO2 glass substrate (FTO) was partially removed by chemical etching with zinc powder and HCl (4N) to prevent short-circuiting when contacting the counter electrode. | What is ? | 30485 |
{
"text": [
"6.13mAcm−2"
],
"answer_start": [
66
]
} | 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2013.06.103 | For FDSSC based on sample B, its Jsc increases from 5.20mAcm−2 to 6.13mAcm−2, but its FF remains the same. | What is the value of Jsc? | 51291 |
{
"text": [
"7.3%"
],
"answer_start": [
60
]
} | 10.1016/j.dyepig.2013.10.032 | This corresponds to an overall conversion efficiency (η) of 7.3%. | What is the value of η? | 30373 |
{
"text": [
"25 mm2"
],
"answer_start": [
140
]
} | 10.1016/j.solener.2014.09.019 | The electrolyte was introduced into the cells through one of the two small holes drilled on the counter electrodes to give the DSSCs with a 25 mm2 active area. | What is the value of active area? | 37938 |
{
"text": [
"8.75%"
],
"answer_start": [
137
]
} | 10.1039/C4NR06240J | In contrast, the device with the TIPD layer shows enhanced Voc, Jsc, FF, and the overall PCE, which is 0.85 V, 15.10 mA cm−2, 68.2%, and 8.75%, respectively. | What is the value of PCE? | 12348 |
{
"text": [
"7.73 mA"
],
"answer_start": [
137
]
} | 10.1039/B417465H | When the film thickness is increased from 1.0 to about 2.5 µm, the photocurrent Isc increases from 1.63 mA cm−2 to 3.76 mA cm−2 and from 7.73 mA cm−2 to 13.30 mA cm−2 for the samples S1 and S2, respectively. | What is the value of Isc? | 67691 |
{
"text": [
"100 mWcm−2"
],
"answer_start": [
132
]
} | 10.1016/j.nanoen.2019.02.075 | Current density-voltage (J-V) curves of cells were measured with a Keithley 4200-SCS system under a simulated AM 1.5G illumination (100 mWcm−2) generated by a solar simulator (Newport, Oriel Sol3A 94023A). | What is the value of illumination? | 1634 |
{
"text": [
"2.03"
],
"answer_start": [
537
]
} | 10.1016/j.orgel.2014.10.018 | TiO2 nanotube arrays were grown by anodic oxidation of thin Ti foil, while the organic dye was prepared following a simple, easy and not expensive 3-steps synthesis according to the classical procedure for hemi-squaraine sensitizers.The photoconversion efficiency obtained with traditional liquid electrolyte reached a maximum value of 0.97% for a sensitization time of only 30 min, confirming the fast linkage of squaric acid moiety anchoring group to the anatase surface also with quasi-1-D nanostructures.A higher efficiency value of 2.03% was achieved when the commercial Iodolyte AN-50 was replaced by a iodine-free liquid electrolyte, thanks to its greater transparency in the visible region which allows capturing a larger number of photons responsible for the electric charge generation.The employment of a highly bendable working electrode based on TiO2 nanotube arrays grown up on a thin Ti sheet can be regarded as a first step toward the fabrication of a flexible DSSC. | What is liquid? | 34065 |
{
"text": [
"10.90%"
],
"answer_start": [
120
]
} | 10.1039/C5TA02507A | The thiophene based HTM 33 showed better photovoltaic performance (η = 12.51%) compared to the phenyl based HTM 34 (η = 10.90%) due to a high photocurrent and fill factor. | What is the value of η? | 18166 |
{
"text": [
"c-TiO2"
],
"answer_start": [
33
]
} | 10.1039/C7NR09657G | Such a device is composed of FTO/c-TiO2/m-TiO2/m-Al2O3/CsPbI3/carbon. | What is FTO? | 13779 |
{
"text": [
"785mV"
],
"answer_start": [
239
]
} | 10.1016/j.dyepig.2019.107776 | To further develop efficient DSSCs, two additional bulky dihexyloxyphenyl groups and a BTD unit were simultaneously introduced into XW56, and thus the highest efficiency of 7.03% was achieved, with the Jsc and Voc values of 12.5mAcm−2 and 785mV, respectively. | What is the value of Voc? | 50290 |
{
"text": [
"Pb(Ac)2·3H2O"
],
"answer_start": [
86
]
} | 10.1039/C8TC01570H | The lead acetate perovskite precursor solution was prepared by dissolving CH3NH3I and Pb(Ac)2·3H2O (3:1 molar ratio) at 40 wt% in anhydrous DMF without (0.0%) and with different volume ratios of DMSO (2.5%, 5.0%, or 7.5%). | What is perovskite? | 20093 |
{
"text": [
"0.25cm2"
],
"answer_start": [
133
]
} | 10.1016/j.electacta.2019.134858 | Electrodeposition was conducted in a three electrode system (porous TiO2 photoelectrode as the working electrode which controlled to 0.25cm2 active area, Ag/Ag+ electrode which filled with 0.01M AgNO3 aqueous solution as the reference electrode, and platinum sheet as the counter electrode). | What is the value of active area? | 42028 |
{
"text": [
"89 mV"
],
"answer_start": [
202
]
} | 10.1039/C4RA09727K | It is noteworthy that the Ni0.9Mg0.1O based DSC possesses 85% higher efficiency than the NiO reference, ascribed to much higher Jsc (5.16 mA cm−2versus 3.84 mA cm−2), decently higher Voc (109 mV versus 89 mV) and FF (0.34 versus 0.30) of the former. | What is the value of Voc? | 75859 |
{
"text": [
"4.90%"
],
"answer_start": [
190
]
} | 10.1039/C7TA02474F | In iodide-based electrolyte, the DSSC with the TiO1.1Se0.9/CC exhibits a power conversion efficiency (η) of 9.47%, which is higher than cells with CEs of Pt/CC (7.75%) and pristine TiO2/CC (4.90%). | What is the value of η? | 63224 |
{
"text": [
"7.88%"
],
"answer_start": [
93
]
} | 10.1016/j.jtice.2015.12.004 | As can be seen all photovoltaic performance of the cell was successfully improved; being PCE=7.88%, JSC=17.66mA/cm2FF=0.63 and VOC=0.72. | What is the value of PCE? | 54735 |
{
"text": [
"0.46%"
],
"answer_start": [
280
]
} | 10.1039/C8TC03542C | The other organic dye, D21 L6, was slightly less performing with a VOC of 645 mV, JSC of 7.92 mA cm−2, FF of 0.59 and PCE of 3.05%; while the Ru-based dye proved to be poorly compatible with PEDOP yielding a device with a VOC of 440 mV, JSC of 1.97 mA cm−2, FF of 0.53 and PCE of 0.46%.Zhang et al. | What is the value of PCE? | 70974 |
{
"text": [
"1.40%"
],
"answer_start": [
125
]
} | 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2013.04.003 | Further enhancement in the PCE was achieved by introducing TiO2 coating layer on ZnO NS, with more than 82% enhancement from 1.40% to 2.56%. | What is the value of PCE? | 59356 |
{
"text": [
"64.5%"
],
"answer_start": [
382
]
} | 10.1016/j.jphotochem.2010.08.023 | These results reveal the stability of the DSSC based on solid-state electrolyte is much better than that of acetonitrile liquid electrolyte.In summary, dye-sensitized solar cell based on all-solid-state electrolytes consisting of PMII ionic liquid and carbon black showed a highly efficient power conversion efficiency of 6.37%, with a Jsc of 15.33 mA cm−2, Voc of 644 mV and FF of 64.5%. | What is the value of FF? | 44327 |
{
"text": [
"10.67 mA/cm2"
],
"answer_start": [
70
]
} | 10.1016/j.jphotochem.2008.02.015 | Compression of non-sintered electrodes at 800 kg/cm2 increased Jsc to 10.67 mA/cm2 and the conversion efficiency up to 4.5%. | What is the value of Jsc? | 30354 |
{
"text": [
"12.65mAcm−2"
],
"answer_start": [
29
]
} | 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2012.10.052 | LC1 has Voc of 0.68V, Jsc of 12.65mAcm−2, FF of 0.73, and η of 6.28%. | What is the value of Jsc? | 42263 |
{
"text": [
"Pt"
],
"answer_start": [
175
]
} | 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2015.07.006 | Differences of merely 0.62% for graphene/PEDOT and 0.79% for graphene/PANI have therefore shown the effectiveness and feasibility of using graphene/polymer-based materials as Pt CE substitutes. | What is CE? | 49855 |
{
"text": [
"67.94%"
],
"answer_start": [
191
]
} | 10.1039/C9CP01032G | The co-sensitized devices with DTP, i.e.N3 + DTP (η = 5.44% JSC = 14.25 mA cm−2, VOC = 0.62 V, and FF = 61.21%), and DTB, i.e.N3 + DTB (η = 5.43%, JSC = 13.13 mA cm−2, VOC = 0.61 V, and FF = 67.94%), showed a slightly higher PCE than the N3 dye alone (η = 5.39%, JSC = 14.39 mA cm−2, VOC = 0.60 V, and FF = 61.98%) whereas with DTNi.e., N3 + DTN (η = 5.32%, JSC = 14.63 mA cm−2, VOC = 0.66 V, and FF = 54.80%), it showed a lower PCE. | What is the value of FF? | 69956 |
{
"text": [
"22.52mAcm−2"
],
"answer_start": [
157
]
} | 10.1016/j.apsusc.2018.09.146 | The champion device with a TiO2-SnO2 bilayered ETL achieved a PCE of 18.85%, with an open circuit voltages (Voc) of 1.100V, a short current density (Jsc) of 22.52mAcm−2 and a fill factor (FF) of 0.761. | What is the value of Jsc? | 1730 |
{
"text": [
"0.83 V"
],
"answer_start": [
224
]
} | 10.1016/j.materresbull.2015.11.020 | The device made from TiO2 photoelectrode delivered conversion efficiency (η) of 3.06% with Jsc of 8.70 mA/cm2, Voc of 0.69 V and FF of 50.47 whereas the N and F doped TiO2 achieved η of 3.91% with Jsc of 7.21 mA/cm2, Voc of 0.83 V and FF of 64.67. | What is the value of Voc? | 41814 |
{
"text": [
"3.4%"
],
"answer_start": [
63
]
} | 10.1039/C5NR04179A | The stabilized PCE of the device made at 1% RH was found to be 3.4%, whereas it was measured to be 7.1% from the fast scan J–V curve (Fig. | What is the value of PCE? | 19785 |
{
"text": [
"8.04%"
],
"answer_start": [
101
]
} | 10.1016/j.tet.2015.04.018 | As a result, the JH03 cell with a FF of0.735 exhibits the highest power conversion efficiency (η) of 8.04%.In order to understand the Voc difference for JH-DSCs, we measured the relative conduction band position (ECB) of TiO2 by means of charge extraction method (CEM). | What is the value of η? | 54231 |
{
"text": [
"7.19%"
],
"answer_start": [
122
]
} | 10.1016/j.ceramint.2018.11.091 | The AP-HC-based DSSC exhibited marginally lower PCE (6.92%) and Jsc (14.15 mA cm−2) than that of the Pt-based DSSC (PCE = 7.19% and Jsc = 15.77 mA cm−2); moreover, it exhibited a significantly higher FF (0.68) than Pt (0.65). | What is the value of PCE? | 42620 |
{
"text": [
"1.02"
],
"answer_start": [
118
]
} | 10.1016/j.nanoen.2019.103964 | The device C with 2at% Cu doping and spin-coating of SnO2 solution at 4000rpm resulted in a best performance with Voc=1.02V, Jsc=23.20mA/cm2, FF=72.41% and PCE=17.14% (see ). | What is ? | 8018 |
{
"text": [
"15.58%"
],
"answer_start": [
42
]
} | 10.1039/C6CP06486H | In particular, a prominent PCE as high as 15.58% is also achieved for the device with a 120 nm thick PC61BM layer, which represents the highest efficiency ever reported for PeSCs with a PC61BM film thickness more than 100 nm. | What is the value of PCE? | 15414 |
{
"text": [
"19.03%"
],
"answer_start": [
31
]
} | 10.1039/C8TA10170A | The highest PCE in our work of 19.03% was achieved for TiO2-based planar PSCs prepared at 35 °C. | What is the value of PCE? | 14856 |
{
"text": [
"18.44%"
],
"answer_start": [
133
]
} | 10.1016/j.mtener.2017.10.002 | As a result, the optimized SrCl2-derived perovskite film enabled the device to show an improved power conversion efficiency (PCE) of 18.44% with good reproducibility, which outperforms that of the control device (PCE: 15.94%) without SrCl2.Herein, we adopted the sequential 2-step deposition route to fabricate perovskite films, which has been proven to provide good morphological control of the prepared film The X-ray diffraction (XRD) pattern of these prepared films were shown in a, where the main diffraction peaks for the pristine PbI2 thin film located at 12.58°, 25.35° and 38.01° which are in good agreement with the existing literature ). | What is the value of PCE? | 5061 |
{
"text": [
"0.836 V"
],
"answer_start": [
358
]
} | 10.1039/C5RA07720F | Extending the π-conjugation of the dyes broaden and red-shift the bands and improves the light-harvesting ability, however, a device made with triphenylamine maximizer-based dye TPAM-1 without a π-conjugated spacer exhibited the best photovoltaic performance with a short-circuit photocurrent density (Jsc) of 11.37 mA cm−2, an open-circuit voltage (Voc) of 0.836 V, and a fill factor (FF) of 0.603, corresponding to an overall power conversion efficiency of 5.67% under AM 1.5 irradiation (100 mW cm−2).Since the first paper by O'regan and Grätzel, dye-sensitized solar cells (DSSCs) have attracted much attention because they present a highly promising alternative to conventional photovoltaic devices. | What is the value of Voc? | 69017 |
{
"text": [
"8.17%"
],
"answer_start": [
184
]
} | 10.1039/C8RA02765J | It is found that the DSSC fabricated with the 5% Ag-doped CoS CE achieved an impressive power-conversion efficiency (PCE) of 8.35% which was higher than that of the DSSC with a Pt CE (8.17%) by 2.2%, while the DSSC consisting of undoped CoS only exhibited a PCE of 6.93%. | What is the value of PCE? | 71794 |
{
"text": [
"1.06%"
],
"answer_start": [
404
]
} | 10.1016/j.molstruc.2012.12.003 | The detailed parameters (Jsc, Voc, ff, and η) are summarized in COOH dye shows a better comprehensive properties with an open-circuit voltage (Voc) of 0.49 V, a short-circuit photocurrent density (Jsc) of 5.5 mA cm−2, and a fill factor (ff) of 0.65, corresponding to a solar-to-electricity conversion efficiency (η) of 1.75% under AM 1.5 irradiation (100 mW cm−2), while PZnCOOH sensitized one yields η= 1.06% with Voc= 0.40 V, Jsc= 4.0 mA cm−2, and ff= 0.66. | What is the value of η? | 28411 |
{
"text": [
"3.8%"
],
"answer_start": [
235
]
} | 10.1039/C5NR02433A | 5 for the Co2+/Co3+ redox shuttle electrolyte solution, it can be seen that the PCE of the SWCNT plastic CE was 3.6%, which is close to the PCE of DSSCs with sputtered Pt on indium tin oxide-plain polyethylene terephthalate (ITO/PET) (3.8%).The graphene nanoplatelet (GNP) is a very promising alternative CE material. | What is the value of PCE? | 74218 |
{
"text": [
"0.712"
],
"answer_start": [
221
]
} | 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2011.10.111 | The DSSC which comprised of the composite P90–Tnr TiO2 electrode with a m-SBA-15 scattering layer achieved the highest conversion efficiency of approximately 6.94% with Jsc of 15.63 mA cm−2, with an open-circuit (Voc) of 0.712 V and a filler factor of 0.62 under illumination of 100 mW cm−2. | What is electrode? | 30735 |
{
"text": [
"62%"
],
"answer_start": [
155
]
} | 10.1016/j.optmat.2019.05.039 | The PSSC-1 made with CH3NH3GeI3 sensitized Er3+@TNPs photoanode shows the lowest PCE and its photovoltaic parameters as follows: Voc=920mV, Jsc=6.26mA, FF=62% and η=3.57%. | What is the value of FF? | 11069 |
{
"text": [
"17.50mA/cm2"
],
"answer_start": [
87
]
} | 10.1016/j.jallcom.2016.10.145 | The highest value of PCE can be achieved in the DSSCs based on NP-15mL, Voc=719mV, Jsc=17.50mA/cm2, FF=0.669, PCE=8.42%, which was higher than that of NP-P25 (6.10%).To further reveal the charge transfer and recombination dynamics in these devices, the electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) was carried out in the dark under forward bias of−0.8V shows the nyquist plots of DSSCs based on different kinds of TiO2 nanoparticles. | What is the value of Jsc? | 36072 |
{
"text": [
"TiO2"
],
"answer_start": [
42
]
} | 10.1016/j.electacta.2016.02.073 | The counter electrode and dye-adsorbed nc-TiO2 photoanode on FTO glass were prepared as described in Sections . | What is photoanode? | 27258 |
{
"text": [
"100mWcm−2"
],
"answer_start": [
46
]
} | 10.1016/j.dyepig.2015.07.026 | The illumination intensity was measured to be 100mWcm−2 with a calibrated silicon photodiode. | What is the value of illumination? | 27654 |
{
"text": [
"Pt"
],
"answer_start": [
172
]
} | 10.1016/j.electacta.2019.03.232 | Furthermore, when utilized for BQDSSCs, Co0.85Se also presented the highest front and rear power conversion efficiencies of 8.33% and 4.79% in comparison with Ni0.85Se and Pt CEs. | What is CEs? | 33348 |
{
"text": [
"16.56%"
],
"answer_start": [
347
]
} | 10.1039/C5CC04405G | The enhanced quenching indicates effective charge extraction, which is in good agreement with the remarkable performance displayed by both HTMs.In summary, spiro-arranged acridine and fluorene based HTMs were synthesized and applied in the fabrication of CH3NH3PbI3 based perovskite solar cells, among which the host CW4 showed the highest PCE of 16.56% in the absence of a cobalt dopant. | What is the value of PCE? | 21338 |
{
"text": [
"11.96mA/cm2"
],
"answer_start": [
110
]
} | 10.1016/j.solener.2019.04.049 | The rise in efficacy has been observed till 3% loading of CeO2 NC which furnished highest PCE ∼4.36% with Jsc∼11.96mA/cm2, a Voc∼647mV, a FF∼56.5% (See ). | What is the value of Jsc? | 53442 |
{
"text": [
"25"
],
"answer_start": [
73
]
} | 10.1016/j.solener.2010.07.009 | The TiO2 nanoparticles thus produced have a mean particle size of around 25 nm. | What is TiO2? | 29205 |
{
"text": [
"3.3%"
],
"answer_start": [
16
]
} | 10.1016/j.orgel.2016.07.022 | This η value of 3.3% is apparently low, but it is comparable to 3.4% for the DSSC prepared by ourselves using MK-2, which is well-known as an excellent organic dye (). | What is the value of η? | 28826 |
{
"text": [
"6%"
],
"answer_start": [
102
]
} | 10.1039/C4TA06425A | With the optimized doping oxygen flow ratio of 10% and thickness of mesoporous NiO layer, a PCE of 11.6% was obtained. | What is the value of PCE? | 19040 |
{
"text": [
"5.565mA/cm2"
],
"answer_start": [
38
]
} | 10.1016/j.dyepig.2015.09.008 | T3H exhibits η of 0.226%, with Jsc of 5.565mA/cm2 and Voc of 0.133mV. | What is the value of Jsc? | 23247 |
{
"text": [
"7.21%"
],
"answer_start": [
490
]
} | 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.09.083 | Under these intense local fields, the generation rate of photo-excited electrons in dye would increase significantly, and thereby enhance the photocurrent ), which would obviously impede the transport of electrons and increase the possibility of charge carrier recombination ) shows no obvious regularity changes for different amounts of AuNRSs, the η of the DSSCs varying with different amounts of AuNRSs shows a similar tendency to that of Jsc and Voc, which reaches the highest value of 7.21% in the Au2.0-DSSC, giving a 23.0% enhancement compared with that of the conventional Au0.0-DSSC (5.86%). | What is the value of η? | 48395 |
{
"text": [
"IA"
],
"answer_start": [
180
]
} | 10.1039/C7NR00718C | Consistent with our results, the typical mass loading of 24 ± 3 mg cm−2 for ICA as the CE shows the highest PCE than that of the other CEs (the mass loading of bare In2S3, IC, and IA are 26 ± 2 mg cm−2, 23 ± 2 mg cm−2, and 30 ± 3 mg cm−2, respectively). | What is CEs? | 66051 |
{
"text": [
"72.2%"
],
"answer_start": [
85
]
} | 10.1039/C3EE44174A | The device prepared with P3HT yielded a JSC = 14.0 mA cm−2, a VOC = 620.1 mV, a FF = 72.2%, and a PCE = 6.3%, the lowest performances obtained from the devices prepared with other HTMs. | What is the value of FF? | 15452 |
{
"text": [
"1.25%"
],
"answer_start": [
47
]
} | 10.1016/j.synthmet.2012.11.001 | CA1, CF1 and CK1 dyes give a η value of 2.05%, 1.25% and 2.01%, respectively. | What is the value of η? | 32672 |
{
"text": [
"0.75V"
],
"answer_start": [
134
]
} | 10.1016/j.solener.2019.02.016 | The best performance is observed for the device based on ZTO double-shell microspheres, which exhibited a Jsc of 8.45mAcm−2, a Voc of 0.75V and a FF of 0.74. | What is the value of Voc? | 24413 |
{
"text": [
"19.51%"
],
"answer_start": [
114
]
} | 10.1016/j.solmat.2019.110197 | Under the optimum volume of EA (40μl) at RH of 20% and x=0.048, the devices exhibit impressive PCEs of 20.93% and 19.51% with suppressed hysteresis for active areas of 0.12cm2 and 0.7cm2, respectively. | What is the value of PCE? | 6136 |
{
"text": [
"3.78 cm2"
],
"answer_start": [
42
]
} | 10.1016/j.solener.2016.02.004 | The active area of the fabricated cell is 3.78 cm2. | What is the value of active area? | 30310 |
{
"text": [
"Ag"
],
"answer_start": [
100
]
} | 10.1016/j.cplett.2017.07.069 | The electrons are transported to TiO2 and collected at FTO electrode whereas holes are collected at Ag electrode. | What is FTO? | 11453 |
{
"text": [
"63.76%"
],
"answer_start": [
150
]
} | 10.1016/j.orgel.2017.08.027 | The p-PSCs based on bare c-TiO2 (Al-0%) exhibited a short-circuit density (Jsc)=20.76mA/cm2, open-circuit voltage (Voc)=0.97V, and a fill factor (FF)=63.76%, yielding an overall PCE=12.84%. | What is the value of FF? | 12027 |
{
"text": [
"5.6%"
],
"answer_start": [
160
]
} | 10.1039/B709911H | In methods 4 and 5 (heat treatment before and after applying pressure) little change in efficiency was observed: The performance of the solar cells was η = 5.3–5.6%. | What is the value of η? | 64116 |
{
"text": [
"16.58%"
],
"answer_start": [
131
]
} | 10.1039/C8NR06095A | However, the use of a 15 nm thick MoOx interlayer degrades the PCE of the spiro-OMeTAD based perovskite solar cells from 18.10% to 16.58%. | What is the value of PCE? | 19891 |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.