text
stringlengths 1
1.59M
| meta
dict |
|---|---|
This is SERC's response to NERC's Task Force letter.
---------------------- Forwarded by Christi L Nicolay/HOU/ECT on 11/30/99
09:31 AM ---------------------------
Joe Hartsoe@ENRON
11/30/99 08:09 AM
To: Christi L Nicolay/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: NERC Policy Interpretation Task Force
FYI
---------------------- Forwarded by Joe Hartsoe/Corp/Enron on 11/30/99 09:13
AM ---------------------------
Dave Mangskau
11/29/99 05:39 PM
To: Joe Hartsoe/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Richard Ingersoll/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: NERC Policy Interpretation Task Force
Joe & Dick:
Perhaps you have already received a copy of
this???
---------------------- Forwarded by Dave Mangskau/Corp/Enron on 11/29/99
03:53 PM ---------------------------
"William F Reinke" <[email protected]> on 11/29/99 03:02:40 PM
To: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected], Dave Mangskau/Corp/Enron@ENRON,
[email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
cc: [email protected]
Subject: NERC Policy Interpretation Task Force
TO: Regional Chairmen
Gentlemen:
The attachment contains a letter from SERC to the NERC Chairman and the
Chairman of the Policy Interpretation Task Force, with a copy to the NERC
President, on the matter of the TVA/Enron dispute. I wanted you to be aware
of
this communication. I also want to be sure that you understand that our
concerns deal solely with reliability and due process issues. Please advise
if
you have questions concerning this matter.
Sincerely,
William F Reinke
SERC Chairman
(See attached file: Serc Ltr to Neale and Hawks Nov 29.doc)
- Serc Ltr to Neale and Hawks Nov 29.doc
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
Start Date: 1/4/02; HourAhead hour: 13; No ancillary schedules awarded. No variances detected.
LOG MESSAGES:
PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final Schedules\2002010413.txt
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
Keith:
Please coordinate with Susan Bailey who can take care of the details for you.
Mark
Keith MacIvor@ENRON
09/19/2000 10:14 AM
To: Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: John Peyton, Chris Hilgert/HOU/ECT@ect
Subject: Pride Day Rate 250IC Confirm
We received approval from Lavorato to do this transaction. Please check the
attached confirm. I have removed the language which required COO approval and
also changed the option premium to $150,000 from $140,000. Also Pride signed
the ISDA and faxed over the signature page. How do we or can we assign a
date to the ISDA for the confirm?
Thanks for you help!
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
(See attached file: HPLN0401.xls)(See attached file: HPLN0331.xls)
- HPLN0401.xls
- HPLN0331.xls
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
I wanted to be sure you had this information.
Steve
----- Original Message -----
From: <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, April 13, 2001 11:40 AM
Subject: RE: Spread Value Calc.
> Steve, Just talked with Barry. He said based on last night's curve, the
> valuation formula would result in a value of $250 mil. A detailed calc
for
> this value will have to wait til Monday.
>
>
> ----- Forwarded by Gerald Nemec/HOU/ECT on 04/13/2001 11:37 AM -----
>
> "Meier, Peter"
> <peter.meier@ne To:
"'[email protected]'" <[email protected]>,
> g.pge.com> [email protected],
"Meier, Peter" <[email protected]>,
> "'[email protected]'"
<[email protected]>
> 04/13/2001 cc:
[email protected], "'[email protected]'"
> 01:33 AM <[email protected]>,
"'[email protected]'"
> <[email protected]>,
"Barron, Bob" <[email protected]>,
> "Sarti, Daniel"
<[email protected]>, "Jones, Susan"
> <[email protected]>
> Subject: RE: Spread Value
Calc.
>
>
>
>
>
> We will review this in the morning. In the meantime, it would be
extremely
> helpful to know what the practical effect of your calculation would be.
In
> other words, using this method, what is the valuation of each of the
> packages as of today? Please e-mail your calculation to each of us on the
> PG&E team. Thanks, Peter
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Thursday, April 12, 2001 6:44 PM
> To: [email protected]; [email protected]
> Cc: [email protected]
> Subject: Spread Value Calc.
>
>
> Attached is a draft of the mark to market language per your discussion
with
> Barry. Please review and contact Barry directly to discuss.
>
> Barry's numbers
> (713) 667-9956 Home
> (713) 302-6442 Cell
>
> (See attached file: PGESpreadvaluationdefinition.doc)
>
>
> PG&E National Energy Group and any other
> company referenced herein that uses the PG&E name or
> logo are not the same company as Pacific Gas and
> Electric Company, the regulated California utility. Neither
> PG&E National Energy Group nor these other
> referenced companies are regulated by the California Public
> Utilities Commission. Customers of Pacific Gas and Electric Company
> do not have to buy products from these companies in order
> to continue to receive quality regulated services from the utility.
>
>
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
All those Houston Chronicle articles that you are sending to Tracey, will you send them to me at the address that I left on your computer?
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
Thanks, Steve. That helps clear things up enormously (at least in my little
mind).
Best,
Jeff
Steve Walton@ECT
02/28/2001 09:27 PM
To: Jeff Dasovich/Na/Enron@ENRON
cc: Alan Comnes/PDX/ECT@ECT, James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Jeff
Dasovich/NA/Enron@ENRON, Mary Hain/HOU/ECT@ECT, Paul Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT,
Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, Susan J Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON
Subject: Re: Cost of Protectionism
Jeff,
In order for California to "shut its doors" it must open its
interconnections with the rest of the west and become a Texas-like electrical
island. This they cannot do. California has a substantial investment in
units located in Nevada, Arizona, New Mexico and Utah. The lights would go
out in California if they opened the ties. In the 1970's there was a hue and
cry over loop flow, with California claiming that it was being injured by
others, particularly by the interior systems trading practices, however they
never considered opening the ties, because the benefits of interconnection
were so large that the "cost" of loop flow was far exceeded by the value of
regional trade, i.e., they are economically interdependent.
If such a foolish thing were done and California full "closed its doors" by
opening its ties, cost would go up in the Northwest, in California and all
the rest of the Western System. There are "gains for trade" which accrue to
all parties from interconnection. The trade is more complicated than just
summer/winter peaks (seasonal load diversity) there is also seasonal resource
diversity (Spring run off effects) and finally there opportunity to
capitalize on storage vs base load thermal operations. I will address the
last point first to illustrate the complexity of the trading patterns.
The interior west (Montana, Wyoming, Utah, Arizona and New Mexico) has large
amount of base load coal plants. As load drops off in those areas, the
energy flows to the coast to back off peaking plants and to back off hydro.
The reduction of hydro production allows night time reservoir refill which
can be used to meet peak load in the Northwest and California. This can be
seen in the attached file, which contains a set of plots for hourly flow on
the Pacific DC Intertie Jun97, Dec 97, Jun 98, Dec 98, Jun 99, Dec 99,
Jun00. In these plots the clear day/night exchange of energy can be seen,
especially in the Jun00 plot when sales are being made to California in the
day and to the Northwest at night. This day to night storage exchange
benefits lowers costs for everyone.
On top of this daily/weekly cycle, there is the seasonal shift in load
diversity you noted. For the Northwest, its peak load occurs when energy
production is the lowest -- during the winter. As a stand alone system, the
Pacific Northwest (i.e., the Columbia Drainage area) is energy constrained.
The hydro in that area does not produce enough energy to meet annual needs.
There is plenty of generating capacity to meet any peak, but not enough to
total water flow. Energy imports from Wyoming and Montana (e.g. Colstrip and
Bridger) are required to allow the Pacific Northwest to meet its annual
energy requirement. With these energy inputs from the coal fields, the
seasonal water budget can be arranged to get the most value out of the hydro
system, although fish, navigation, irrigation, etc. impose an increasing
number of constraints. Energy imports from in the winter from the South help
to meet this energy balance during the winter so water can be reserved until
the snow pack is better know in early Spring. Some of the sales to the
Northwest from California during the winter are a result of displacement from
Desert Southwest energy moving through California and then up the Interties
to the Northwest.
Finally, the Spring run off/fish flush when production on the river is at a
maximum and load in the Northwest is down. The sale of these surpluses paid
for the Pacific Intertie lines and remain important to the entire system.
Much system maintenance of base load units has been historically been planned
to take advantage of this factor. Again both California and the Northwest
benefit from this trade.
In all cases, the parties would be worse off if the ties were open and
everyone was on their own. The Northwest may be capacity long, but it is
typically energy short, even in flush hydro years. The winter energy imports
from the South hold Northwest costs down just as spring run off sales to the
South lower energy costs in California. California cannot craft a solo
solution that ignores the rest of the West. It is probably hard to decide
who would be worst off if California "closed its doors". It is only clear
that total cost would rise in both California and the rest of the West from
which it divorced itself.
I hope this rambling response comes at the question you raise.
Steve
Jeff Dasovich@ENRON
Sent by: Jeff Dasovich@ENRON
02/28/2001 11:35 AM
To: James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron
cc: Alan Comnes/PDX/ECT@ECT, Mary Hain/HOU/ECT@ECT, Steve
Walton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Susan J Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON, Richard
Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, Paul Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: Cost of Protectionism
To Jim's last point. I understand that the good 'ol utility system was often
operated with little regard for basic economic principles, but there's
something in this that seems very odd and difficult to assess, and it seems
to always be tied to this notion that "California is a net importer, even in
the winter." I'm going to start with the economics and then let folks
describe why it seemingly doesn't apply in Western electricity markets.
Just about every theory of economics and trade would lead to one conclusion:
If California closes it's doors the other Western states will pay higher
prices for power and/or face increased threats to reliability. I'm
struggling to try to determine why these basic principles aren't applicable
to Western power markets. I understand that the PNW is a very complex place
and that the reasons could be embedded in the arcane structure that has
developed over the years.
To keep it simple (though not necessarily accurate), I've confined the
analysis to a world in which only the PNW and California exist.
The basic situation: The PNW peaks in the winter; California peaks in the
summer.
Let's take two scenarios:
1) The West, less California, is so awash in electricity that even in its
peak--the Winter--it still has power to send to California, i.e., it has so
overbuilt it's system that it has persistent surpluses to sell to California.
Irrespective, there have (to my limited knowledge) always been sales from CA
to the PNW during the winter, when the PNW is peaking.
The only conclusion that one can make, assuming that the PNW is awash in
electricity, is that the PNW takes the power in California because it makes
economic sense to do so. That is, during the winter peaking months, it must
be cheaper on the margin for the PNW to buy from California rather than
produce itself. Otherwise, it's difficult to understand why it would buy
from California during this month, particularly if they're long. As such, at
a minimum, the PNW's electric bill will necessarily increase if California
closes its doors.
2) Neither the PNW , nor California, has indigenous capacity to meet peaking
load. Therefore, the PNW must buy California's power during its peaking
summer period, and California must buy power during it's summer peaking
period. In this case, not only will the PNW's bill go up if California
closes its doors, the lights are likely to go because they'll be short power.
I realize that this is a simplistic model, and that there could be other
legitimate economic factors driving the flows out of California to the PNW
(e.g., transmission costs). And again, I also realize that economics may not
have traditionally been a driver in the industry. But I thought it might be
useful to get a common framework in place as a starting point for the
question that Jim asks.
With that, I'll pose the question (understanding the simplicity of the model
set forth above): Given that California sends power north--even if the PNW
is long---how can California closing it doors not increase the PNW's cost of
power?
Best,
Jeff
James D Steffes
02/28/2001 08:05 AM
To: Alan Comnes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc: Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Mary Hain/HOU/ECT@ECT, Steve
Walton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Susan J Mara/NA/Enron@Enron
Subject: Re: Cost of Protectionism
It seems to me that this information leads one to conclude that the value of
an open transmission network is that California does not have to build 5,000
MW of power plant (4,500 MW max input + 10%) in state. In other words, if
California were to disconnect from the grid, someone would have to build
additional power plants in-state.
The cost to California consumers is therefore the annual carrying cost of 10
500 MW plants (made even more expensive after California expropriates the
current fleet of merchant generation).
From the perspective of the remainder of the West, the question still remains
- if California does go it alone, what is the economic impact? Other than
legal arguments about Interstate Commerce, why should the Federal Government
want to continue to pursue open acess? This is the hard question that we
need to answer.
Jim
Alan Comnes@ECT
02/27/2001 09:40 PM
To: James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron
cc: Susan J Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON, Steve Walton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mary
Hain/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Cost of Protectionism
Jim, Jeff:
Jim asked me in a voice mail what would be the cost to California of moving
from the current (evolving) system of open access to a "protectionist"
environment where access to the grid would be determined by a political body
responding to populist pressures.
Here are some things to consider. We can talk more and I welcome Sue Mara or
Steve Walton's input:
California is a net importer so any restraint of trade would risk the state
being able to meet its own demand. See attached slides that show PNW-CA
trade. Even in the winter, power on a net basis flows south.
Limiting open access would primarily act to hold in-state generators hostage.
this will kill incentives for new investment
If the ISO's proposal for market power mitigation are any guide of where a
protectionist ISO would go:
in-state generators would be required to sell forward or lose their market
based rate certificates
load serving entities would be required to contract forward for load and a
reserve margin.
This is costly: it will lead to centralized planning solutions to
reliability rather than more efficient market outcomes
Artifical notions of "just and reasonable" rates (on top of unreasonable
reserve requirements) would lead to severe reliability problems. (In other
words, if Steve Peace has his way, the imports into the state will drop
off signficanly)
There is no reason the state would be more effective at expanding the grid
(e.g., Path 15) than the current system. (Although, admittedly the current
system has flaws. The CAISO was set up with little thought to transmission
expansion planning. Other RTOs are not repeating this mistake.).
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
FYI. Just got a call from Jan Smutney-Jones. Apparently, word is on the
street that Peace intends to begin targeting Enron as an example of the
"misconduct" that Peace alleges has occured in California's markets. Smutney
thinks Peace may be keying off the comments of the "unnamed" trader in the
Dow article claiming that Enron's been buying power and holding on to it.
Apparently Peace's other angle is/will be: "The same people who colluded in
the design of this market are now colluding to profit unfairly from it." No
idea of when and how Peace might launch any attacks. Two immediate thoughts:
Apart from the bad reporting in the Dow article, that article shows that
Enron got beat by, among others, two federal (Canada and the US), one state
(SRP) and one municipal (LADWP) government.
David Freeman, who now heads up LADWP, was appointed "Czar" by the State of
California and charged with the task of implementing Steve Peace's brain
child (AB 1890). Freeman set up the ISO and PX market structures. He also
set up the Governing Boards.
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
---------------------- Forwarded by Randall L Gay/HOU/ECT on 11/01/2000 01:20
PM ---------------------------
Heather Choate
11/01/2000 12:07 PM
To: Jessica White/NA/Enron@Enron, Lia Halstead/NA/Enron@ENRON, Scott
Loving/NA/Enron@ENRON, Alvin Thompson/Corp/Enron@Enron, Wes
Dempsey/NA/Enron@Enron, Teresa McOmber/NA/Enron@ENRON, Hillary
Mack/Corp/Enron@Enron, Kevin Brady/NA/Enron@Enron, Ted Evans/NA/Enron@ENRON,
Shelly Mendel/NA/Enron@ENRON, Jan Sutherland/NA/Enron@ENRON, Brandee
Jackson/NA/Enron@ENRON, Tammy Gilmore/NA/Enron@ENRON, Tammy
Carter/NA/Enron@ENRON
cc: George Smith/HOU/ECT@ECT, Edward Terry/HOU/ECT@ECT, Randall L
Gay/HOU/ECT@ECT, Patti Sullivan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Victor Lamadrid/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Alex Saldana/HOU/ECT@ECT, Hector McLoughlin/Corp/Enron@Enron, Janet De La
Paz/HR/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Robert Superty/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Performance Management Process Overview
Please plan to attend a meeting that will provide an overview of the
Performance Management Process at Enron to those new hires that arrived in
Logistics after our Mid Year Performance Process.
This meeting will be held during lunch...
Monday, November 6, 2000
from 11:30am to 1pm in EB30c2
(lunch will be provided)
Please RSVP for lunch.
Thanks! Heather Choate, x33278
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
Do you know what day it is?
I do . . . .it's the Legal Department Happy Hour TONIGHT, beginning at 5:00pm
at Ninfa's One Allen Center. BE THERE OR BE SQUARE!!!! See ya'll there.
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
Dear Shelley,
Thank you for shopping at Hallmark. Here's a recap of your order according to our records:
Order Number: WEB13665566
Order Date: 02/07/2002
Total Order Amount: $74.90
We'll send another note when the shipment goes out.
If you need more information, click here to use our self-help:
http://help.ecards.hallmark.com/cgi-bin/rightnow/
or click the Customer Service link on Hallmark.com.
***************
If you placed your order on Hallmark.com and would like to check the status, go to Hallmark.com and click the "Order Status" link.
If you are a Hallmark.com member, enter your username and password, click on "get previous orders," and then click the order number.
If you are not a member, first enter the order number and your e-mail address, then click "order status."
If you placed your order by phone, or would simply prefer to call to check your order status, you can call us at 1-800-Hallmark (1-800-425-5627). It will help if you have your order number handy. We are open Monday through Friday 8 am - 7 pm, Saturday 9 am - 7 pm and we are closed on Sunday.
***************
Don't forget to visit Hallmark.com whenever you need great gifts for everyone on your list. You'll find gourmet desserts, Hallmark collectibles, cards and more. And fresh-cut Hallmark Flowers add beauty to any occasion, in any season. Be sure to visit us often to see our newest products and special offers.
Need a great gift at the very last minute? Attach a Gift Wish Certificate to an e-card, and your recipient can redeem it for gift certificates from over 300 stores, restaurants and services. It's fast and it's easy, and it's only at Hallmark.com.
http://www.hallmark.com
Sincerely,
Jody Ellis
The Hallmark Team
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
Greg and Isabel:
I still need signed copies of the following closing documents for our
closing volumes:
1. Legal Opinion of counsel to GE;
2. GE Parent Guaranty;
3. Promissory Note of the LLC payable to PPL;
4. Security Agreement by the LLC in favor of PPL;
5. Financing Statements by the LLC;
6. Letter of Credit furnished by GE;
7. GE Acknowledgement of Receipt; and
8. Consent of Directors of the LLC electing officers (signed by Kenneth
Ross).
Also, we have signed copies, but would like original signatures of the
parties other than ENA if available, of the following documents:
1. Letter Agreement;
2. Escrow Agreement;
3. GE Letter re Forms of Agreement;
4. ENA Letter re Forms of Agreement;
5. Entitlement Letter Agreement;
6. ENA Consent and Agreement;
7. GE Consent and Agreement; and
8. Escrow Disbursement Instructions.
As to the second list, there is no need for re-execution of any documents,
but I recall that you were having a sufficient number of originals signed by
your clients to provide an original signature to ENA. Please advise of the
timing for forwarding these documents. Thank you.
Carolyn M. Campbell
King & Spalding
713-276-7307 (phone)
713-751-3280 (fax)
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
Confidentiality Notice
This message is being sent by or on behalf of a lawyer. It is intended
exclusively for the individual or entity to which it is addressed. This
communication may contain information that is proprietary, privileged or
confidential or otherwise legally exempt from disclosure. If you are not the
named addressee, you are not authorized to read, print, retain, copy or
disseminate this message or any part of it. If you have received this
message in error, please notify the sender immediately by e-mail and delete
all copies of the message.
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
713 303 5973
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
Susan:
Jorge Garcia on the interest rate and currency desk forwarded this e-mail to me requesting certain RMT masters.
Thanks!
Marie
-----Original Message-----
From: Garcia, Jorge A.
Sent: Wednesday, October 10, 2001 12:52 PM
To: Heard, Marie
Cc: Adams, Laurel
Subject: ISDA Master Agreements Required
Good Afternoon Marie,
Here is a list of inner company counterparties that require ISDA Master Agreements. I checked the Financial Trading Agreements listing in Lotus Notes to make sure an ISDA Master Agreement didn't already exist. Please double check your version in the event a counterparty was deleted as a result of the historical problem that we previously discussed regarding missing counterparty ISDA Master references.
Counterparty Name Original Trade Date
Compagnie de Papiers Stadacona Ltee 04/04/01
ECT Europe Accounting 03/29/01
ECTRIC Crude 06/15/01
ECTRIC Softs 06/15/01
ECTRIC Spain 03/12/01
ENA Merchant Assets 02/04/00
Enron Broadband Investments Corporation 08/27/01
Enron Broadband Services Marketing Ltd. 03/26/01
Enron Corporation 11/04/98
Enron Holdings 1 S.L. 08/29/01
Enron Industrial Markets LLC 07/13/01
Enron International Inc. 08/07/98
Enron Metals Commody Ltd. 03/20/01
Enron Metals Recycling GmbH & Co. KG 02/19/01 (Financial Trading Agreements states "Sent for execution")
Enron Power Holdings 12/17/99
Enron Power Operations Ltd. 01/27/99
Enron Power Marketing Inc. 12/29/97
Enron South America LLC 04/20/00
EnSerCo, LLC 09/25/98
Enron Wind Corporation 07/17/01
Please advise should you require any additional information.
Regards,
Jorge A. Garcia
Manager- Risk Management
Enron Global Markets LLC
713/853-5596
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
They are wondering if we can help them with offsets for these positions....
-----Original Message-----
From: "Conover, Curtis (EKT)" <[email protected]>@ENRON
Sent: Tuesday, October 30, 2001 1:37 PM
To: '[email protected]'
Subject: EKT Positions
Chris,
AECO:
LONG | SHORT
2001 |
Dec | 77.5 Contracts
2002 |
Jan | 93 Contracts
Feb | 84 Contracts
Mar | 93 Contracts
April 45 | Contracts
May 46.5 | Contracts
June 45 | Contracts
July 31 | Contracts
Aug 31 | Contracts
Sep 30 | Contracts
Oct 31 | Contracts
NWPL-Canadian (Sumas)
LONG | SHORT
2001 |
Dec 14.9 | Contracts
2002 |
Jan 14.9 | Contracts
Feb | 28.6 Contracts
Mar | 31.6 Contracts
April 14.4 | Contracts
May 14.9 | Contracts
June 14.4 | Contracts
July 14.9 | Contracts
Aug 14.9 | Contracts
Sep 14.4 | Contracts
Oct 14.9 | Contracts
Nov | 15.6 Contracts
Dec | 16.1 Contracts
2003 |
Jan | 16.1 Contracts
Feb | 14.6 Contracts
Mar | 16.1 Contracts
Let me know if you need any more information.
Thanks
Curt Conover
Entergy-Koch Trading, LP
713-544-5150
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
--------- Inline attachment follows ---------
From: </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=RHAYSLE>
To: Gary Smith- VP of Human Resources@ENRON <??SGary Smith- VP of Human Resources@ENRON>
Date: Monday, November 19, 2001 8:04:07 GMT
Subject:
Do you know anything?
--------------------------
Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld (www.BlackBerry.net)
-----Original Message-----
From: Becker, Melissa <[email protected]>
To: Hayslett, Rod <[email protected]>
Sent: Mon Nov 19 13:26:54 2001
Subject: other end of the spectrum
Has your group been asked (by your BU or by anyone else) to identify those possible candidates for personnel reductions? Please let me know.
Wes Colwell has been working on a "10%" list per request from his BU, and Rick is going to ask Bob Butts to start working on it tomorrow (after 10Q is filed).
If you have not been asked, you may want to start thinking about it. Rick said that there may be a request coming to complete the list this week (and to notify people as early as next week), although he has not as yet received that request.
Thanks!
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
demand charge for #444771.
PL
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
-----Original Message-----
From: Intercontinental Staffing Group [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Tuesday, October 30, 2001 2:18 PM
To: Undisclosed-Recipient:@mail3.cadvision.com;
Subject: Intercontinental Staffing Group
I would like to introduce Intercontinental Staffing Group. Our offices in Houston and London are primarily focused on serving the energy trading industry, bringing together top energy trading talent with the worlds leading energy trading companies. Our search consultants have past experience in either trading or brokering energy products. This gives us a distinct advantage with respect to our knowledge of and exposure to the energy trading industry.
We are currently working on filling several trading and marketing/origination positions throughout the US. If you have an interest or know of someone who is looking for a new career opportunity, please contact me at the phone number listed below or feel free to email me at [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>. We do offer a referral fee if we are successful in placing one of your recommendations.
Thank you for your time. I look forward to speaking with you.
Sincerely,
Gary Pitt
Director
Intercontinental Staffing Group Inc.
Phone: (713) 850-8399
Fax: (713) 850-7746
Cell Phone: (281) 467-0022
email: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
Thanks Tana,
We actually need another redraft, that now corresponds to the worksheet and a
parent guaranty.
Thanks
Russell
From: Tana Jones on 09/26/2000 06:18 PM
To: Russell Diamond/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Samantha Boyd/NA/Enron@Enron
Subject: Re: United Oil & Minerals -Amended Credit W/S
Russell,
I spoke to the cpy about this, and what it turned out he wanted was the
Local Currency ISDA form. I gave that redraft to Mary to sign off on the
same day I wrote that note, but she's been too busy to look at it, and the
file is now MIA from her office. I'll check with her tomorrow and she what
she did with it.
Russell Diamond
09/26/2000 05:53 PM
To: Samantha Boyd/NA/Enron@Enron
cc: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: United Oil & Minerals -Amended Credit W/S
Samantha,
Tana,
I have attached an amended credit worksheet for the referenced counterparty.
This amended worksheet includes a Guaranty from its parent company of $5MM,
thus increasing the collateral threshold to $5MM, and amending other credit
covenants.
Per the Legal Comment in the Master Swap Lotus Notes Database, Tana received
a call from the counterparty requesting a 'less complicated' agreement. In
the comment, Tana suggested using an Industrial Master, if this agreement is
OK from a Legal standpoint, I am OK using the Industrial from a Credit
standpoint.
Please draft this amended credit worksheet to an amended Industrial Master.
Thank you,
Russell
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
Chris:
I received a call from Mike Danielson today. He works for the West Power
Origination group under Chris Calger. He was interested in learning more
about what has been transpiring with PD. He recently met with Ariz. Elect.
Power Coop, (AEPCO) who floated the idea of Enron selling them fixed price
power at Palo Verde and AEPCO selling phyiscal to meet PD needs after the
AEPCO contract with PD expires.
We got Joe Robertson on the telephone who indicated you are meeting with PD
perhaps today.
As we have discussed, our strategy is to not call PD and allow you guys to
work your magic and let us know when you need assistance on gas or energy
pricing or physical delivery.
Can you give us an update of your efforts so far? Is there anything that we
should be doing at this time?
Thanks!
Chris
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
Dear All,
Today we have calculated and entered the annuity to account for CSU transfer from LT-SW to ST-WROCK for June 2001. Here are the specifics:
Deal # 630226.1
Amount: $2,981,238
LT-SW will be paying ST-WROCK for the position transferred. The economics will be reflected in your P&L as of 6/1/2001.
In addition to entering the annuity, I have zeroed out June 2001 strip in LT-SW deal # 573463.1 and added May strips in ST-WROCK deal # 576470.1.
Please let me know if you have any questions.
Thanks,
Fran
503.464.7973
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
Jim Derrick
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]@ENRON [NOTES:[email protected]@ENRON]
To: James Derrick Jr. <[email protected]>
Sent: Mon Nov 26 18:07:50 2001
Subject: <<Concur Expense Document>> - Return Trip from MIT Visit - Special BOD
The following expense report is ready for approval:
Employee Name: Paula H. Rieker
Status last changed by: Automated Administrator
Expense Report Name: Return Trip from MIT Visit - Special BOD
Report Total: $2,015.88
Amount Due Employee: $2,015.88
To approve this expense report, click on the following link for Concur Expense.
http://expensexms.enron.com
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
Attached is the memo that has been prepared for Enron by Frontier Economics
outlining Frontier's observations relating to why the proposed rule changes
are ill advised. I will provide this document to the 7 member committee of
industry stakeholders the Power Pool has assembled (Enmax, Atco, TransAlta,
Enron, SPPA, WattEx, and CalPX) to receive feedback on its proposed rule
changes. The first meeting of this committee is tomorrow afternoon. I will
also provide the memo to the Alberta Government.
As part of our action plan we are also in the process of working with Seabron
Adamson of Frontier Economics and my colleagues in the Government Affairs
Group to put together a document that outlines the negative and unforseen
impacts in other jurisdictions of significant changes in rules or market
design that have been made and that are similar to the changes proposed in
Alberta. This document will be provided to the Alberta Government officials
and the Power Pool at upcoming meetings that we are attempting to arrange.
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
Ross -
As we discussed, attached is both a redlined and clean version of the Deloitte letter. The redlined reflects the changes we have made to our form based upon the comments submitted by Deloitte. The clean version incorporates the changes and can be used to finalize this matter, the only thing still needing to be completed is the name and address on the letter.
Please let me know if you should need anything further.
Mark
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
Forwarding the attached in case you have not seen it.
Received: from s330.mofo.com (h-207-197-207-102.ncal.verio.net
[207.197.207.102]) by mail.qeuo.com; Thu, 22 Mar 2001 19:09:13 -0800
Received: from 150.150.1.71 by s330.mofo.com with ESMTP (Tumbleweed MMS SMTP
Relay (MMS v4.7)); Thu, 22 Mar 2001 22:07:42 -0500
X-Server-Uuid: f57e99cc-be1e-11d3-8d46-0008c7d388a4
Received: by S010.MOFO.COM with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) id
<HDR44KKT>; Thu, 22 Mar 2001 19:07:38 -0800
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
From: "Beaudoin, Kathy E." <[email protected]>
To: "Baldocchi, Jennifer" <[email protected]>, "Bird,
Kristen" <[email protected]>, "Butz, Douglas" <[email protected]>,
"Carroll, Ron" <[email protected]>, "Cregan, Nora" <[email protected]>,
"Currey, Brian" <[email protected]>, "Ebiner, Lawrence P." <[email protected]>,
"Erspamer, Gordon P." <[email protected]>, "Fergus, Gary"
<[email protected]>, "Hartman, Anne Hayes" <[email protected]>, "Lifrak,
Michael" <[email protected]>, "Mersel, H. Mark" <[email protected]>,
"Morrissey, John" <[email protected]>, "Olivar, Harry"
<[email protected]>, "Pritchard, Diane E." <[email protected]>,
"Ramfjord, Per" <[email protected]>, "Roth, Jennifer" <[email protected]>,
"Thorpe, Douglas" <[email protected]>, "Urquhart, A. William"
<[email protected]>, "Williams, Marc S." <[email protected]>, "Yudkowsky,
Alan" <[email protected]>
cc: "Erspamer, Gordon P." <[email protected]>, "Mar, Patricia S."
<[email protected]>, "Irvin, Kenneth W." <[email protected]>
Subject: PG&E Ltr to PX re $177M Iso Payment
Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2001 19:07:37 -0800
Return-Receipt-To: "Beaudoin, Kathy E." <[email protected]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21)
X-WSS-ID: 16A4627117468-01-01
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="_-==16A461E6100==-_"
============================================================================
This message contains information which may be confidential and
privileged.
Unless you are the addressee (or authorized to receive for the
addressee),
you may not use, copy or disclose to anyone the message or any
information
contained in the message. If you have received the message in error,
please
advise the sender by reply e-mail @mofo.com, and delete the message.
Thank you very much.
============================================================================
- PG&E Ltr re ISO Funds.pdf
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
----- Forwarded by Sue Nord/NA/Enron on 12/05/2000 09:42 AM -----
James D Steffes
12/04/2000 06:18 PM
To: Sue Nord/NA/Enron@Enron, Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, Harry
Kingerski/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: DSL Economics
FYI. Information from EBS on DSL Economics.
At prices under $50/month (for DSL and ISP service), the article says that
payback is only 12 months [Don't follow this necessarily because $600 first
year Capex with only $600 of fees].
Clearly if you add on installation and potentially internal wiring fixes
(moving a phone jack to the TV set) this only makes it harder to work.
Also, interesting to note that Cable Modems are at least 10x faster than ADSL
(why not go that route)?
Jim
----- Forwarded by James D Steffes/NA/Enron on 12/04/2000 06:10 PM -----
Rita Hartfield@ENRON COMMUNICATIONS
12/04/2000 11:07 AM
To: James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron
cc: Anthony Mends/Enron Communications@Enron Communications
Subject: DSL Economics
Jim, attached is a summary of the ADSL market including the required capital
expenditures required per subscriber.
If you have any additional questions, please call me at ext. 35854.
Rita Hartfield
Phone: 713-853-5854
Cell: 713-304-5428
Fax: 713-646-8861
[email protected]
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
Payout party will be this weekend.
Who: Everyone who participated in the league but I'm sure the
winners who live in Houston will really want to be there to collect
What: Watch the Wild Card game and get the winners to spend their
money on the losers
When: Sunday, Jan 13 at 12PM
Where: SRO's at the Northwest Mall at 610 and 290 (across from
Longhorn Saloon)
For those of you who won and don't live in Houston or will not be
able to attend, please email me your address at [email protected]
so I can send your money to you. Thanks and see everyone on Sunday.
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Send FREE video emails in Yahoo! Mail!
http://promo.yahoo.com/videomail/
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
Robert,
I do not see any attachments. Thanks,
Channing
-----Original Message-----
From: EL00-95 List [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Robert
Rosenberg
Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2001 3:27 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: EL00-95, public version of AEPCO's 11/6/01 filing
Attached are the items that Arizona Electric Power Cooperative, Inc.
("AEPCO"), filed today in response to Judge Birchman's 11/15 order on
confidentiality: transmittal letter, testimony summary (same as
before), AEP-2 (redacted), AEP-8 (made public in its entirety), AEP-10
(made public in its entirety), and certificate of service. Hardcopy (no
CD) is also being mailed to the restricted service list.
Robert D. Rosenberg
Slover & Loftus
1224 Seventeenth Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20036
(202) 347-7170
(202) 347-3619 (fax)
[email protected]
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
The requirement that all three arbitrators have 10 years of experience in
unrealistic. We will be hard pressed to find one. Most arbitrators are
lawyers.
With respect to the second change, it is not a change we should make. This
changes the arbitration from a party designate arbitration where one of the
arbitrators is our advocate, to a totally nuetral panel.
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
No further Board approval is required. I'm told that new products on EOL
require the lawyers to get involved but that will happen when you request to
put the product online. Rick
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
Ken wanted to make sure you saw this speech.
---------------------- Forwarded by Rosalee Fleming/Corp/Enron on 09/21/2000
01:40 PM ---------------------------
Joe Hillings
09/21/2000 12:41 PM
To: Rosalee Fleming/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Tori L Wells/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Sen. Hagel's ESI speech
Rosalee: I understand that Ken Lay and Senator Hagel will be together this
evening at the Horatio Alger event I believe in Williamsburg. The attachment
is the speech Chuck gave this week before ESI and Ken may find it helpful in
some discussion tonight. Joe
---------------------- Forwarded by Joe Hillings/Corp/Enron on 09/21/2000
12:47 PM ---------------------------
[email protected] (Ken Peel) on 09/20/2000 06:34:56 PM
To: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected]
cc:
Subject: Sen. Hagel's ESI speech
I thought you might be interested in seeing a copy of a speech on
international energy policy that Sen. Hagel gave today at the Economic
Strategy Institute in Washington, D.C.
- hagelesi.rtf
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
David:
Yes, the UCC (Article 2) would be the basis for not requiring a signed
confirmation from the counterparty receiving the confirmation if the physical
product is a "good" under the UCC. This I think answers your second question
also.
Regards, Alan
[email protected]
07/20/2000 10:38 PM
To: [email protected], [email protected]
cc: [email protected]
Subject: Electronic Signatures
Thanks for sending the chart. I will send you the list of questions we
discussed tomorrow. In the interim, I had a couple of questions on the
chart: On the first line (physical, no master), is the basis for not
requriing the confirm to be signed the UCC? Also, what is meant by "unless
commodity not 'good'"?
Thanks.
----------------------------------
This e-mail is sent by a law firm and contains information
that may be privileged and confidential. If you are not the
intended recipient, please delete the e-mail and notify us
immediately.
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
Tax Foundation's 63rd National Conference
Thursday, November 16, 2000
Four Seasons Hotel, Washington, DC
Corporate Tax Shelters
I would like to invite you and any interested parties to attend the Tax
Foundation's 63rd National Conference, "Corporate Tax Shelters."
The goal of the conference is to give a balanced view of the issue from the
perspective of the Administration, Capitol Hill, the Judiciary, and tax
practitioners. It will also examine corporate tax shelters and distinguish
the line that defines them as either legitimate business transactions or tax
shelters. Speakers include:
Secretary Lawrence H. Summer, Department of the Treasury
Judge David Laro, U.S. Tax Court
Professor Ronald Pearlman, Georgetown University
Kenneth Kies, PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Mark Prater, Majority Chief Tax Counsel, Senate Committee on Finance
Russ Sullivan, Minority Chief Tax Counsel, Senate Committee on Finance
Timothy Hanford, Majority Tax Counsel, House Committee on Ways and Means.
If you are interested in attending this year's conference please open,
print, and complete the registration form below and return it using the
information provided.
<<Conference registration.DOC>>
****************************************************************************
************************************************************************
Tax Foundation's 63rd Annual Dinner
Thursday, November 16, 2000, Four Seasons Hotel, Washington, DC
Black Tie Event
6:00 p.m. Reception, 7:00 p.m. Dinner and Presentation of Distinguished
Service Awards to:
Public Sector: Congresswoman Jennifer Dunn (R-WA)
Private Sector: Charles G. Koch, Koch Industries, Inc.
For more information on the 63rd Annual Dinner contact Ren,e Nowland by
phone 202/661-4223 or by e-mail [email protected]
****************************************************************************
************************************************************************
- Conference registration.DOC
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
I have 3 tickets available for the Beavers game tonight, these are in the
Enron Pavilion Suite, game starts at 6:30 PM.
I also have a parking pass available.
First person to express interest is the winner!
Thanks.
Mollie
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
John,
Sorry to have missed you--I didn't get to my e-mail in time.
Dutch filled me in on exactly what I was looking for--thanks very much.
Jeff
-----Original Message-----
From: Arnold, John
Sent: Thursday, October 04, 2001 3:17 PM
To: Andrews, Jeff
Subject: RE: morning gas views
can we meet at 4:00 instead?
-----Original Message-----
From: Andrews, Jeff
Sent: Thursday, October 04, 2001 7:35 AM
To: Arnold, John
Subject: RE: morning gas views
John,
Thanks very much.
Would 4:45ish be alright with you?
-----Original Message-----
From: Arnold, John
Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2001 5:46 PM
To: Andrews, Jeff
Subject: RE: morning gas views
come on up tomorrow afternoon.
-----Original Message-----
From: Andrews, Jeff
Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 8:35 AM
To: Arnold, John
Cc: Fraser, Jennifer
Subject: morning gas views
John,
We have developed a "morning briefing" for Gary Hickerson that includes primarily views on the crude and products markets. Recently, Gary has asked that we include a brief overview on Nat Gas in this packet. We have worked with Chris Gaskill to get the morning briefing that he puts together for you and your traders and find it very helpful.
However, I am interested in going a step further and would like to talk with you or one of your traders on a regular basis in order to get a more trading-centric view on this morning packet. Specifically, I want to ask the question, "What do you view as most important in this information" so we can develop our own "value added" information for Gary's group.
Is there one of your traders who I might be able to meet with (after market close, of course) to discuss?
Thanks, John.
Jeff
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
Please send the CNG stuff to
Jeffrey Keister
Dominion Transmission, Inc.
445 West Main Street.
Clarksburg, WV 26301
---------------------- Forwarded by Chris Germany/HOU/ECT on 08/25/2000 11:46
AM ---------------------------
Chris Germany
08/25/2000 11:46 AM
To: [email protected]
cc: Angie Zeman/Corp/Enron@ENRON
Subject: Goodies
Jeff, welcome to the club. We are going to send you, Ora Ash, Jeff Davis,
and Cindy McGinnis some goodies. You, Ora, and Jeff will get Enron shirts.
Cindy gets a jacket. Don't try selling this stuff on the street, OK? I will
be checking to make sure you pass the "goodies" on.
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
I would like to take 1/2 day of vacation Friday.
Debra Perlingiere
Enron North America Corp.
Legal Department
1400 Smith Street, EB 3885
Houston, Texas 77002
[email protected]
Phone 713-853-7658
Fax 713-646-3490
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
Tami,
Thank you so much for your invitation. I think it is a wonderful idea. I,
however, will be unable to attend. Thank you againn and I am sure that you
will have a wonderful time.
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
Here's the list. Comments?
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
Regarding BC Utility, I have discussed a GISB with Mr. Wong and we have
been unable to come to agreement due to their choice of law restriction.
Because they are a utility they are by statute required to bind agreements
subject to British Columbia. Conversely as this would be an agreement
subject to state laws of Texas as well as the United States, it will not
work to agree to British Columbia as jurisdiction for this contract.
Please let me know if you have any questions, or I can be of further
assistance.
Debra Perlingiere
Enron North America Corp.
Legal Department
1400 Smith Street, EB 3885
Houston, Texas 77002
[email protected]
Phone 713-853-7658
Fax 713-646-3490
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
Enron in Action can be accessed through the new Community Relations web site at http://cr.enron.com/eia.html . In this week's issue you will find out information regarding:
Enron Happenings
Enron's Operation Hope: Reclaiming Our Future One Step at a Time
Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation "Walk to Cure Diabetes"
Quality of Life Coalition - Houston
American Heart Association "Heart Walk"
Museum of Fine Arts 2001 - 2002 Membership Drive
Enron Volunteer Opportunities
Assemble Care Packages for New York Firefighters
Sunshine Kids at Astroworld!
Justice for Children
Assist PSI HomeSavers with Home Repair
MD Anderson Cancer Center - Children's Art Project
Enron Wellness
2001 - 2002 Flu Immunization Program
Help us help others. Call and schedule a massage today!
Join The Downtown Club at The Met
Involved Employees
Rice University Young Alumni Halloween Monster Bash
Par "Fore" Pets Golf Tournament
In addition, Enron in Action is available through a channel on my.home.enron.com. To add this channel to your set-up click on the channels link at the top of the screen and under announcements check the Enron in Action box.
If you wish to add an announcement to Enron in Action, please fill out the attached form below and submit it to mailto:[email protected] no later than 12 PM Thursday each week.
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 12/22/2000
05:29 PM ---------------------------
Shirley Crenshaw
12/20/2000 10:51 AM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT, [email protected]
cc:
Subject: Lance's telephone
Hi Vince:
Lance's telephone # is: (512) 280-5052.
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
My suggestions:
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
Dear Evening MBAs -
WELCOME TO HAAS or WELCOME BACK, whatever the case may be....
I work closely with your Evening MBAA VPs of Alumni Affairs, Tom Schneberger and Bharath Rangarajan, to make sure you know about all the alumni activities and programs. If, for some reason, you would like to meet with me to discuss other alumni services and connections, please email me to arrange a meeting.
Just a reminder that we encourage you to incorporate alumni networking into your business school experience from day one. Alumni will be an essential resource to you for class projects, career advice, internships, and long-term professional opportunities. My overall recommendation is that you tap into the online resources that the Haas Alumni Network provides and attend as many student - alumni events as you can!
A few things I want to emphasize to you:
# 1 INFORMATION YOU NEED TO KNOW ABOUT REGISTERING WITH THE
HAAS ALUMNI NETWORK ONLINE COMMUNITY
A) YOUR STUDENT ID = YOUR FIRST TIME SECURITY ID for this password
protected community
B) WHEN REGISTERING, SELECT A USER ID that you LIKE (select it as
carefully as you would a tattoo... because this is also your prefix for
your lifelong Haas alumni email address). For example, if your
haas/uclink account is mthompson@haas. you should choose mthompson as
your USER ID and it will automatically become the first part of your
email forwarding address - [email protected]. Since your
friends will come to memorize your school email address, get them in the
habit early of knowing what your lifelong email forwarding address will
be.
C) REGISTER NOW SO that you can
....ACTIVATE YOUR HAAS LIFELONG EMAIL FORWARDING ADDRESS (and START
PUTTING IT ON YOUR STUDENT BUSINESS CARDS/RESUME)
....UPDATE YOUR ONLINE DIRECTORY PROFILE
as a student you automatically have a profile in the directory and we
ENCOURAGE you to put in any relevant work or industry experience so that
other alumni and students can network with you in your specific field or
industry. For example, if you are doing working at HP *and*
attending school part-time, you might be a really good resource to
another student considering that type of work at that specific company. You can enhance the
network by showcasing your skills, connections, and expertise in your
online directory profile. Please make sure your address and
business info is current.
#2: MARK YOUR CALENDARS TO COME TO THE FOLLOWING STUDENT - ALUMNI FOOTBALL TAILGATES IN THE COURTYARD (two hours before kickoff):
- Oct. 13
- Nov. 3
- Nov. 10
sponsored by the MBAA and the Haas Alumni Network.
#3: BOOKMARK THE ALUMNI WEBSITE ON YOUR COMPUTER: <http://www.haas.berkeley.edu/alumni/>
Enjoy your experience at Haas.... and please let me know if you have any questions.
Thanks,
Tenny Frost
Director, Alumni Relations
Tenny H. Frost
Director of Alumni Relations | Haas School of Business | University of California, Berkeley
S520 Student Services Building, #1904 | Berkeley, CA | USA 94720-1904
510/642.7790 (Alumni Relations Office) | 510/643.5340 (direct line)
510/643.0531 (fax) | [email protected]
explore our site --- <http://haas.berkeley.edu/alumni>
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
at Bank of America at 10:42 am. Thanks for paying it!!
Keoni Almeida
California Independent System Operator
phone: 916/608-7053
pager: 916/814-7352
alpha page: [email protected]
e-mail: <mailto:[email protected]>
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
I am, in fact, at the office as we speak. I am NOT in?Yet.
-----Original Message-----
From: Fenner, Chet [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Friday, March 29, 2002 10:12 AM
To: 'chad knipe'; Fenner, Chet; Brad Corrier; Joe Parks; EriK Wollam; Brian Constantine; Brian & Terry Constantine
Subject: RE: G.F.
Yes. Save the welcome back for Sunday. Today is when HE split (right, Father?).
-----Original Message-----
From: chad knipe [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Friday, March 29, 2002 7:54 AM
To: Chet Fenner; Brad Corrier; Joe Parks; EriK Wollam; Brian Constantine; Brian & Terry Constantine
Subject: G.F.
Any of you swines fortunate enough to work today? I have some minor boning to do later but will get IN eventually. Hope ya'll have a so-so, OK, decent, better than average, or just plain Good Friday.
Welcome back jesus.
C.
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
The information contained herein is based on sources that we believe to be
reliable, but we do not represent that it is accurate or complete. Nothing
contained herein should be considered as an offer to sell or a solicitation
of an offer to buy any financial instruments discussed herein. Any
opinions expressed herein are solely those of the author. As such, they
may differ in material respects from those of, or expressed or published by
on behalf of Carr Futures or its officers, directors, employees or
affiliates. ? 2001 Carr Futures
The charts are now available on the web by clicking on the hot link(s)
contained in this email. If for any reason you are unable to receive the
charts via the web, please contact me via email and I will email the charts
to you as attachments.
Crude http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/crude28.pdf
Natural Gas http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/ngas28.pdf
Distillate http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/hoil28.pdf
Unleaded http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/unlded28.pdf
Feb. WTI/Brent Spread
http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/clg-qog.pdf
Feb Heat Crack http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/heatcrack.pdf
Feb Gas Crack http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/gascrack.pdf
Feb Gas/Heat Spread http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/hug-hog.pdf
June Gas/Heat Spread
http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/HUM-HOM.pdf
March Gas/Heat Spread
http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/HUH-HOH.pdf
Feb/May Unlead Spread
http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/HUG-HUK.pdf
Feb/July Crude oil Spread
http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/CLG-CLN.pdf
Nat Gas Strip Matrix
http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/StripmatrixNG28.pdf
Nat Gas Spread Matrix
http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/SpreadmatrixNG28.pdf
Crude and Products Spread Matrix
http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/SpreadmatrixCL28.pdf
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
Sara Shackleton
Enron Wholesale Services
1400 Smith Street, EB3801a
Houston, TX 77002
Ph: (713) 853-5620
Fax: (713) 646-3490
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
ANYTIME. I 'm here to serve you. Remeber me during review time.
Darla Saucier@ENRON
03/15/2001 03:05 PM
To: Chris Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: New Power
THANKS MAN!!!!!
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
Start Date: 3/8/01; HourAhead hour: 9; No ancillary schedules awarded. No
variances detected.
LOG MESSAGES:
PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001030809.txt
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
Does any of this impact the Central Desk?
---------------------- Forwarded by Chris Germany/HOU/ECT on 02/22/2000 07:17
AM ---------------------------
[email protected] on 02/21/2000 04:21:43 PM
To: " - *[email protected]" <[email protected]>
cc: " - *[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Subject: market exits
Chris,
As I indicated on our call about a week ago, CES Retail is attempting to exit
a
number of current markets for Major Accounts business only. The list that
we're contemplating includes CKY, CG&E, DP&L, East Ohio, Indiana Gas, Western
Kentucky, CVA, COH, and BGE. Again, for those LDCs where we participate in
Choice programs, we will continue to serve those customers.
We are trying to have this accomplished prior to March flow so that we can
take
March 2000 forward out of our physical requirements from Enron.
I'll keep you apprised as additional information becomes available.
Thanks,
Melissa
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
Matt says this trade is definitely Q3-02. Let me know if Prebon still
disputes.
Thanks,
Kate
Evelyn Metoyer@ENRON
01/11/2001 08:05 AM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: deal 494014
Hi Kate,
For deal 494014 traded by Matt. Prebon shows term as Q3'03 and we show
Q3'02.
Can you check with Matt.
Thanks!
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
Poor Bobby! What a way to go out. I actually do feel sorry for the guy. He
should have gone out on better terms, but now some people will think of him
only in this context.
Ben
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
---------------------- Forwarded by Robert Badeer/HOU/ECT on 06/26/2000 06:23
AM ---------------------------
Susan J Mara@EES
06/23/2000 01:08 PM
To: Tim Belden/HOU/ECT@ECT, Chris H Foster/HOU/ECT@ECT, John M
Forney/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert Badeer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stewart Rosman/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Mary Hain/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeff Dasovich/SFO/EES@EES, Paul Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT,
Mona L Petrochko/SFO/EES@EES, Sandra McCubbin/SFO/EES@EES, Bruno
Gaillard/SFO/EES@EES, Roger Yang/SFO/EES@EES, Dennis Benevides/HOU/EES@EES
cc: [email protected], Elsa Piekielniak/Corp/Enron@Enron
Subject: Restructuring Today, Friday June 23, 2000
Article on California "gaming", high prices, possible litigation, and Avista
problems
---------------------- Forwarded by Susan J Mara/SFO/EES on 06/23/2000 02:55
PM ---------------------------
Restructuring Today <[email protected]> on 06/23/2000 12:56:25 PM
Please respond to [email protected]
To: 031601Mara <[email protected]>
cc:
Subject: Restructuring Today, Friday June 23, 2000
(see attached file: rt000623.pdf)
Thank you,
Season Hawksley
Marketing Manager
Restructuring Today
U.S. Publishing Company
[email protected]
www.restructuringtoday.com
1-800-486-8201
- rt000623.pdf
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
PG&E pretty much lays it on the line in its recent 8K filing. Obviously, no
one should be throwing the customers to the wolves in this time of high
prices (especially when POG&E duped them into believing that the rolloff
could be no earlier than next year) PG&E seems to be ready to negotiate. I
hope we can work together to get some real changes in the retail market to
make dergulation work.
"Mr. Glynn noted that before the high wholesale power prices began to be
experienced in June 2000, revenues from frozen rates were sufficient to
recover transition costs because revenues at frozen rates exceeded costs,
including wholesale power purchase costs. Reacting to some media
commentary that the Utility could waive the recovery of a material amount
of transition costs, with an associated material write-off of the foregone
transition costs, such that transition costs would have been recovered as
of a date when there were no deferred wholesale power purchase costs, Mr.
Glynn indicated that was one of several possible approaches for the Utility
to assess. Mr. Glynn indicated that, if the value of the Utility's
hydroelectric generating assets, as reflected in the settlement agreement
filed by the Utility and other parties on August 9, 2000, were to be
credited to the transition costs, then such costs would have been fully
recovered during August 2000. Mr. Glynn based his statement on the
following facts: Without considering the value of the Utility's
hydroelectric assets, at August 31, 2000, the Utility's estimated remaining
uncollected transition costs that must be collected during the transition
period were approximately $1.6 billion. As previously disclosed, the
settlement agreement filed by the Utility and others on August 9, 2000,
regarding the valuation and disposition of the Utility's hydroelectric
assets, specifies that the value of those assets for purpose of transition
cost calculation is $2.8 billion, which would be reduced by its book value
of approximately $700 million. Testimony taken to date in the CPUC
proceeding where valuation is to be established put the range of market
values from $2.4 billion to in excess of $3 billion under operating and
market conditions prior to June 2000. Under the electric industry
restructuring law, when the Utility completes recovery of its uneconomic
utility generation-related assets and obligations it will satisfy the
conditions that permit the CPUC to determine that the rate freeze and
transition period are over."
8K attached
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
Craig,
I'm sorry, I didn't redline this...Please take a look, call me so we can discuss then we can send it back to Tony P. for another review.
Many thanks, Kim.
PS. We don't want to tender this until they send in a request. I'm working on that now.
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
Melissa,
I have a question in regards to the handling of Harbor's ISO numbers with the recent payments made to them. Were the ISO numbers included in the payment, netting against any revenues and charges in the system through Enpower? Or were these handled in a different manner? I just want to make sure that I have an understanding of how they were handled.
Thank you,
Kourtney
503-464-8280
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
Today's Washington Post contains a favorable comment on negawatts attributed
to House Energy & Commerce Committee Chairman Tauzin, following efforts we
made yesterday with the Chairman and his staff, both directly and via our
consultants. The Post article reads, "In the coming months, Tauzin said,
Congress will take steps to allow consumers to sell power back to their local
energy grids." We, of course, will continue to push for a version of this
concept that keeps this process open to multiple buyers and sellers, not just
the local utility. The article dovetails with information directly from
Chairman Tauzin and Chairman Barton that they will continue to push our
demand buydown proposal, although we are working with them to shore up
support on the committee in the face of opposition from the usual suspects.
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
We can have you sit down with John Disturnal, Chris Lambie and Mike Cowan in informal interviews.
-----Original Message-----
From: Leung, Victor
Sent: Friday, August 24, 2001 12:38 PM
To: Zufferli, John
Subject: Recruiting
John
I am interested in joining the gas trading team next summer as I will be graduating from the U of C in April. I don't know if I should try going through the fall recruiting or try a different route. I have not talked to neither my superior (Peggy) nor Kathy yet.
I've been with Enron since October, but I was (will be again this fall) doing support work for Ryan Watt, and sometimes for Mike Cowan during the weekends. I work with their supply and demand models, calculate their positions, schedule gas on the Nova pipelines, and work with the Suncor and PetroCanada accounts together with the outsourcing team. Over the summer, I had the opportunity to work with Kathy's group to get some experience on the slightly more complex deal types that Enron offers.
I had an interview with McKay back in early June. However, I guess back then I was doing summer classes, the interview did not go as well as I hoped. Now with summer classes over, I was just wondering if I could try again.
Please let me know what you think and I look forward to your reply.
Kind regards,
Victor Leung
------------------
Enron Canada Corp.
3500 Canterra Tower
400 - 3rd Avenue SW
Calgary, Alberta
Canada T2P 4H2
Main: 403.974.6700
Direct: 403.974.6947
Fax: 403.974.6706
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
Dear Bill,
Thanks for your offer to help us out in our modeling efforts. I hope that we can share our analysis with you in return. Below are some questions that we would like to understand in order to better model the ammonia industry.
In our model we divided the industry to production, consumption, and storage. The storage, especially, is a concern to us because we have almost no understanding how much storage there is. How much storage is in the fields and how much is with the dealers. Also the consumption is very tricky. We are not quite sure how to understand the logistics of what really drive the consumption. I am aware that corn requires the most nitrogen out of all plants. However what else drive the decision of using ammonia as fertilizer I am not sure. How price elastic is the consumption, etc.
In order to ask the questions in order, I would like to summarize them as follow:
How much storage for ammonia is in the US?
How is the storage distributed among producers, dealers, and farmers?
From farmers view, what are the most important decision factors for using ammonia and at what amount?
From the manufacturer perspective, what are the factors that are considered when starting the production and what are the factors considered when shutting the production down. I assume it is not only the differential price between ammonia and natural gas.
Bill, I believe it may be easier just to talk about these questions, as there may not be a simple answer to any of the questions. I will call you in the afternoon, but feel free to call me at 713-345-1763.
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
Jeff,
The information below is for 1959 graduates. I think that you mentioned that
we were looking for a male, which would make Bill's maiden name question
irrelevant. Let me know if you find the person. Like I mentioned earlier, I
have another idea worth considering if this doesn't work.
Take care,
Billy
-----Original Message-----
From: "Krumm, Bill" <[email protected]>@ENRON
Sent: Tue 5/15/2001 12:22 PM
To: Lemmons Jr., Billy
Cc:
Subject: More data
Billy,
Attached is the additional data.
The names are the current names. If he is looking for a woman, I would have
to also ask for "original" name as well but this may not be necessary. Let
me know if you can determine the sex.
I look forward to meeting you when you come to town and no you really don't
have to buy me lunch. This is really a fun place to work.........
Bill
<<Krumm4.xls>> <<Krumm5.xls>>
- Krumm4.xls <<Krumm4.xls>>
- Krumm5.xls <<Krumm5.xls>>
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
yes
Britt Davis@ENRON
11/21/2000 09:07 AM
To: Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Becky Zikes/Corp/Enron@ENRON
Subject: Interfert
Richard,
I have not heard from you re this bill. May I have your authority to pay
it? Casabonne has already called me about its status. Thanks.
Britt
----- Forwarded by Britt Davis/Corp/Enron on 11/21/2000 09:06 AM -----
Britt Davis
11/10/2000 04:22 PM
To: Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Becky Zikes/Corp/Enron@ENRON
Subject: Interfert
Richard,
I have just received an invoice from Christophe Casabonne, the former EGLI
trader who is our star witness/consultant in this matter, in the amount of
15,600 FF. This represents 19 hours and 30 minutes at the agreed-upon rate
of 800 FF. Although I have not checked today, the USD/FF conversion ratio
was about 1/7 a few weeks ago. If something like this still holds, the bill
is for about $2,230.00.
I have reviewed the bill, find it in order, and ask for your authority to pay
it.
I await your instructions.
Britt
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
Start Date: 2/27/01; HourAhead hour: 7; HourAhead schedule download failed.
Manual intervention required.
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
Interesting information floating up from some detailed review work by Tim -
says a lot about the way MG do business I think.
RE NY we should ask the same questions - what prepayments exist ( Philip
Bacon seemed uncomfortable with the need for a DASH for each prepayment on a
contract ) add to this the absence of credit people in NY and we may have
some issues - although Marcelo and others stressed the fact that Concentrates
appeared to move no product without a letter of credit, which was then often
discounted to realise cash!!
Shona we should also discuss the legal contract issue - another comment
yesterday from Philip was that each of his concentrates contracts were
'unique' - whilst I can accept that each may be tailored to customer
preferences - they still need to be CACSed - we should look at the
enforceability/legal risk here.
Whilst information prepayment risk for Metals should come from London -
accessing any relevent inofrmation from NY may be helpful
Will call later !
---------------------- Forwarded by Mike Jordan/LON/ECT on 27/07/2000 09:33
---------------------------
Tim Poullain-Patterson
26/07/2000 21:53
To: Eric Gadd/LON/ECT@ECT, Goran Novakovic/LON/ECT@ECT, Robert
Quick/LON/ECT@ECT, David Hardy/LON/ECT@ECT, Mike Jordan/LON/ECT@ECT, Justin
Boyd/LON/ECT@ECT, Howard Carter/The Metal & Commodity Co Ltd/MGLTD@MGLTD
cc: Richard Sage/LON/ECT@ECT, Diana Higgins/LON/ECT@ECT, Fernley
Dyson/LON/ECT@ECT, Steve W Young/LON/ECT@ECT, Bjorn Hagelmann/HOU/ECT@ECT,
David P Tregar/MGLTD_London/MGLTD@MGLTD
Subject: MG : Russian Prepayment Exposure
The situation at present is as follows:
MG have nine open contracts with four counterparties sourcing mainly copper
from the Russian Federation on a prepayment basis
all contracts are on a floating price basis (LME less discount)
notional value of each contract is circa $0.5-3mm
prepayment is on a unsecured trade finance basis, for between 90-95% value
with balance on exchange of title evidenced by documents
The issues break down into three broad areas:
1) Commercial
At present Enron does not engage in prepayment activities with Russian
Federation counterparties.
No further prepayments are permitted until RAC have performed a DASH for this
activity. As this is likely to take several weeks Howard will liase with
Commercial to manage issues with existing prepayment counterparties arising
from this suspension. Howard and David Hardy will also take immediate steps
to manage down existing prepayment exposures.
2) Legal
Based on a cursory review of the confirmations by Robert, if we are to
continue this activity Legal need to instructed to perform a full review for
several reasons, including:
the confirmations contain ambiguous language concerning basic economic terms,
e.g. pricing date
they are light on the mechanics of the prepayments, and are generally not
constructed in an appropriate way for this type of activity.
"Conditions of Purchase" are attached to the confirmations which refer to
English Law, but as they are not always countersigned, under conflict rules
the closest or real connection may be deemed to be Russian law which, in the
absence of a properly executed agreement raises concerns about enforceability.
there are several "open" contracts with volumetric shortfalls where we are
beyond the delivery period, and which could be considered to have been
discharged by breach. Again the confirmation does not contain adequate
language.
3) Credit/Operational
There are no formal counterparty limits. Nor are prepayment and volumetric
exposures tracked on a contract by contract basis. This information is
necessarily to ensure transparency over contract performance, and needs to be
factored into the overall credit monitoring process.
David has requested this information from MG, and will follow up this one off
exercise by introducing a spreadsheet workaround to enable us to track
exposures based on the methodology developed for Helsinki.
Further work is required to quantify our exposures and to demonstrate that,
despite the issues identified with contractual terms, there is performance
against the contracts. David is pursuing this from a Credit perspective and
will report back to his group his findings by Friday latest.
The issues raised regarding contractual language suggest that we need to
accelerate a planned review of contract language for all MG's activities in
all jurisdictions. Mike and I will discuss bringing this review forward with
Justin.
Any questions, please call.
Regards,
Tim
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
Attached is a referral and resume on an HR professional that I thought might
interest you. The referral comes from James Scribner, a guy that has just
accepted a job offer from me. James and I worked together previously at a
bank, and he is very discerning in his evaluation of talent. When I asked if
he knew of any other talented people at Fleming (his current employer) that
we should know, he immediately suggested Tana. His read is that she is very
bright, creative, and innovative. She has worked on many special projects at
Fleming, but James believes that she would certainly consider a generalist
role as she learned Enron and would then "earn" her way into managing special
projects. I thought that I would give ENA a first look at this candidate.
If you are not interested or do not have a need, please pass this referral
along to other HR groups.
FYI - James will start work here on April 3.
---------------------- Forwarded by Sally Beck/HOU/ECT on 03/09/2000 12:43 PM
---------------------------
"James Scribner" <[email protected]> on 03/08/2000 11:18:40 AM
To: <[email protected]>
cc:
Subject: Resume for Tana Cashion
Sally,
Attached is the resume for Tana Cashion. Thank you for your help.
James Scribner
405/841-8607
[email protected]
- Tana Cashion_1.doc
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
CALENDAR ENTRY: APPOINTMENT
Description:
Terry K. - Oncall
Date: 9/30/2001
Time: 7:00 AM - 8:00 AM (Central Standard Time)
Chairperson: Outlook Migration Team
Detailed Description:
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
Greetings,
The set of files sent last week covered the following dates (times):
0652:
01/02/02 (14:00) to 03/01/02 (10:00)
0653:
01/02/02 (17:00) to 03/01/02 (13:00)
The attached December files also cover the first couple of days in January:
0652:
12/02/01 (08:00) to 01/02/02 (13:00)
0653:
12/02/01 (09:00) to 01/02/02 (16:00)
Matt Meyers
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
8910 Bace Dr, Houston, TX 77055
713-827-2271 hm
713-851-0372 cell
085-62-2348
7/29/68
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
Any thoughts on this request?
-----Original Message-----
From: Buerkle, Jim
Sent: Wednesday, November 07, 2001 10:46 AM
To: Belden, Tim
Subject: FW:
Tim,
Ted Noble works on the weather desk. Is there any sensitivity in providing him with this information?
Jim
-----Original Message-----
From: Noble, Ted
Sent: Monday, November 05, 2001 9:03 AM
To: Buerkle, Jim
Subject:
Jim,
How the mighty bruins have fallen. Too bad because I thought the National Championship game was within reach. Oh well.
The weather desk gas gone through a fundamental transformation and has attempted to align itself with the gas and power desks. Dave Kistler (origination) and I (mid-markets) are getting ourselves organized and we need your help. We would like to get a West Power org chart and if possible a list of your desk's counterparties (we do not want to interfere with your relationships and weather derivatives may be an additional product to sell to your customers). If you could help us out with this, that would be great. Thanks and hopefully I will get out there soon to meet the people and provide a little more clarity to what we are doing and how we can add value to you.
Ted
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
Good morning Sally.
Please find attached the executive summary for Project Green Light. Please let me know if you have any questions/changes. Thanks.
- Tom
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
Again , I should have also sent the following mail yesterday.
...I guess now I should also apologise for filling up your mail box!
Have a good weekend,
Kirstee
---------------------- Forwarded by Kirstee Hewitt/LON/ECT on 28/07/2000
20:22 ---------------------------
Enron Europe
From: Kirstee Hewitt 27/07/2000 18:10
To: Cantekin Dincerler/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Grant Masson/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject:
Hi - I have run the model for the 26th and have the following results :
I have also updated the correlations to include silver and the gold.
The TC delta (treatment charges) are positions only for copper conentrate and
do not
contain any positions due to zinc or lead.
Could you take a look at the figues as this is the first time I have done a
full run and
would like to make sure that I have done things correctly.
I will definitely call to discuss the prices for gold and cocoa beans - the
TC price curve is
another issue however, at the moment we do not have anything other than a
spot price and
a 1 year price so I think we will probably have to set it as a constant.
I have to talk to Andreas soon as he is awaiting my comments on point (2) of
his email that
I forwarded in my last mail.
Also, you will can see that I have subtracted any positions that are from R
Wolf in the Mercur download -
this was point (1) of his note.
As a quick question?
Do you think it is worth including Zinc concentrate (18400 dmt) and lead
concentrate (920 dmt) ?
I think we may need to check the TC price for these and the conversion for
the one given in the model for copper as
I think that the original historical price file (TChistory) is quoted in c/lb
- I guess this is cents/pound? rather
than $/dmt which is the units that position is quoted in .
Speak to you soon
Kirstee
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
fuck you
[email protected] on 04/14/2001 05:42:02 AM
Please respond to [email protected]
To: [email protected]
cc:
Subject: I need your phone # to help your debt problem. [h7gmu]
How would you like to take all of your debt, reduce
or eliminate the interest, pay less per month,and
pay them off sooner?
We have helped over 20,000 people do just that.
If you are interested, we invite you request our free
information by provide the following information.
Full Name:
Address:
City:
State:
Zip Code:
Home Phone:
Work Phone:
Best Time to Call:
E-Mail Address:
Estimated Debt Size:
(All information is kept securely and never
provided to any third party sources)
This request is totally risk free.
No obligation or costs are incurred.
To unsubscribe please hit reply and send a message with
remove in the subject.
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
Wicku,
Oczywiscie, ze sie spotkam z radoscia i przyjemnoscia.
Sporo czasu minelo od czsu, gdy sie ostatni raz widzielismy.
W gre wchodzi praktycznie czwartek wieczorem. W srode sie przeprowadzam,
a w piatek lece do NJ o 21:30.
Moj telefon: 408-855-0263.
Na razie,
Grzegorz
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Monday, February 05, 2001 10:29 AM
To: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]
Subject: Czesc
Grzegorz,
Ludmila doniosla mi, ze pracujesz w Kalifornii.
Bede w Berkeley w srode i w Palo Alto w czwartek i piatek.
Czy masz czas, by spotakc sie na obiad/lunch/kawe?
Pozdrowienia
Wicek
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
Mike,
His comment on the vintage of our transport agreement causes me to think that we'd better look pretty hard at any penalties that do come back to us that might be administered under a broader policy. I recall seeing margin notes on a term sheet that was received by Tenaska when they asked TXU for quotes on a second unit which indicated to me that they were surprised by the proposed hourly imbalance provisions (which would be the case if the existing unit weren't subject to similar penalties). I don't think this changes our communication with Brazos, as they need to know that if penalties are incurred, they eat 'em. However, let's make a mental note to reveiw the Feb-Mar LS invoices to make sure they're being issued in accordance with our contract.
-----Original Message-----
From: Mazowita, Mike
Sent: Friday, March 01, 2002 12:03 PM
To: Parks, Joe; Hill, Garrick; Ken Riesz (E-mail)
Subject: FW: PPEP Spreadsheet
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Friday, March 01, 2002 12:02 PM
To: Mazowita, Mike
Subject: RE: PPEP Spreadsheet
I understand your pain. We are just stating what has been told to us by
the Gas Control group.
The answers to your questions are as follows:
1) The OFO will probably be in effect until sometime on Monday.
2) The Tenaska IV Texas Partners contract is very old and was written
before TXU LSP put hourly swing imbalance penalty provisions in the
Electric Generation contracts. The main remedy for TXU LSP in the
contract is to physically resrict flow to the power plant to stay even with
gas receipt volumes or to demand that the power plant bring in receipt gas
to meet its burn.
I hope this helps.
"Mazowita, Mike" <[email protected]> on 03/01/2002 11:29:34 AM
To: <[email protected]>
cc:
Subject: RE: PPEP Spreadsheet
Jeff:
The problem with all of the power plants is that somebody has to swing on
load to follow the electric profile. This may be us.
Also, how long is this OFO going to be in place??
Secondly, namely because I haven't thoroughly read the contract, what are
the imbalance penalties??
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Friday, March 01, 2002 10:52 AM
To: Mazowita, Mike
Subject: Re: PPEP Spreadsheet
Thanks for the load profile. The official word is still that TXU LSP is
requesting that all power plants stay as even as possible on their hourly
pulls with respect to their nominations.
"Mazowita, Mike" <[email protected]> on 03/01/2002 09:48:26 AM
To: <[email protected]>
cc:
Subject: PPEP Spreadsheet
Jeff,
See attached, ready to print.
<<HourlyRate_3_02.xls>>
Michael Mazowita
Director of Asset Management
White Pine Energy, LLC
6073 Riverton
Troy, MI 48098-1899
Phone: (248) 813-1063
Fax: (248) 813-1064
Cell: (248) 345-4002
Email: [email protected]
**********************************************************************
This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate
and may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of
the intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by
others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or
authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or
reply to Enron Corp. at [email protected] and delete
all copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not
intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a
binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its
affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not be
relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise.
Thank you.
**********************************************************************
(See attached file: HourlyRate_3_02.xls)
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
CALENDAR ENTRY: INVITATION
Description:
Gas and Power Commerical Associate and Analyst PRC Meeting
Date: 7/9/2001
Time: 8:00 AM - 12:00 PM (Central Standard Time)
Chairperson: Stacey W White
Detailed Description:
This is an invitation only meeting. No substitutions or additions are permitted without the permission of John Lavorato.
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
Start Date: 12/19/01; HourAhead hour: 21; No ancillary schedules awarded. No variances detected.
LOG MESSAGES:
PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final Schedules\2001121921.txt
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
Georgeanne told Eugenio about another Enron stock swap. This one is very
large, with an exposure to 12 million shares (though it is a little hedged by
the Phantom swap). As a result, the VaR for non-trading securities increased
from an average $6 to $39 million.
We also recalculated Merchant Asset VaR.
Regards,
Adarsh and Eugenio
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
what is his email?
From: Jeff Dasovich@ENRON on 01/04/2001 04:22 PM
Sent by: Jeff Dasovich@ENRON
To: Vicki Sharp/HOU/EES@EES
cc:
Subject: Re: Brief Summary of Today's Activities in California (at Least Thus
Far)
Yes, I'll get to Mike Day.
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
Have not heard of any problems for switching Lyons to Bushton recompress, so it is planned to make the switch. But the Bushton Treater inlet filters have developed high differential and are being changed today. So the plan is to make the switch tomorrow, Tuesday, 01/15/02.
Thanks,
John
---------------------- Forwarded by John Sturn/ET&S/Enron on 01/14/2002 11:41 AM ---------------------------
From: John Sturn on 01/11/2002 02:34 PM
To: Team Bushton-Operations/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Team Lyons/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Jesse Alvarado/Enron@EnronXGate, Roy Armitage/Enron@EnronXGate, Rodney Barnes/Enron@EnronXGate, Richard Barry/Enron@EnronXGate, Keith Braswell/Enron@EnronXGate, Rory Calhoun/Enron@EnronXGate, Steve Coash/Enron@EnronXGate, Jeffrey Cochran/Enron@EnronXGate, Helen Cummings/Enron@EnronXGate, Jerry Graves/Enron@EnronXGate, Margaret Hall/ENRON@enronXgate, Crandal Hardy/Enron@EnronXGate, Gaynel Henley/Enron@EnronXGate, Bart Monden/Enron@EnronXGate, Jeff Moore/Enron@EnronXGate, Robert Munson/Enron@EnronXGate, Alan Muntz/ENRON@enronxgate, Ron Spain/Enron@EnronXGate, Edward Welsh/Enron@EnronXGate, Steven January/Enron@EnronXGate, Dale Ratliff/Enron@EnronXGate, Darrell Schoolcraft/Enron@EnronXGate, Gary Spraggins/Enron@EnronXGate
cc: Team Bushton-Maintenance/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, David Gaines/Enron@EnronXGate, Dean Hallowell/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Mike Peschka/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Dan Dobbins/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
Subject: Lyons Withdrawal Switch to Recompress Suction
Please let me know if you see any problems with switching the Lyons withdrawal volumes to the Bushton recompress suction on Monday, 01/14/02.
Lyons has been free flowing into the Bushton C north, but there is desire to lower the pressure on the field. Switching to the recompress suction should lower the Lyons pressure to the 550 PSIG or less range.
The people I've talked to so far see it as a good deal. If I don't hear of any problems I will talk to Gas Control on Monday and make the change.
Thanks,
John
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
I discussed this w/Frank, and wanted to make the other two of you aware,
since this is a Bermuda corporation, they are only allowed to trade the US
segment of bandwidth. Since this is the only segment we are trading online
yet, this isn't an issue. But as we move forward and add more segments we
are going to have to keep in mind that although a counterparty may have been
open for US, we need to consider if they can trade other country based
segments as we add them in the future.
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
who is this
---------------------- Forwarded by Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT on 01/10/2001
03:04 PM ---------------------------
ARSystem <[email protected]> on 01/10/2001 01:47:30 PM
To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
cc:
Subject: Request Submitted: Access Request for [email protected]
You have received this email because the requester specified you as their VP.
Please click
http://itcapps.corp.enron.com/srrs/auth/emailLink.asp?ID=000000000011525&Page=
Approval to review and act upon this request.
Request ID : 000000000011525
Request Create Date : 12/28/00 5:38:21 PM
Requested For : [email protected]
Resource Name : VPN
Resource Type : Applications
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
Stacey,
Let me know if this is what you are looking for.
Approximately every one to two weeks or as requested by the options traders an option sensitivity report is run using PortCalc. Three parameters are tested: Price (increments from -5 to +5), monthly Volatility (increments from -25% to +25%), and Time (increments up to 90 days. The data is imported from PortCalc into an Excel pivot table. The pivot table is then used to show how the various Greeks (delta, gamma, theta and Vega) change for each trader's book, generally with a 3 month look ahead. The data can also be sorted by and grouped by other criteria, if requested, such as by region and delivery date.
Michael Mattox
x34317
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
As we just discussed, Hess would like to conclude five (5) ISDA Master
Agreements with Enron companies as follows:
1. Amerada Hess Corporation and Enron North America Corp.
2. Hess Energy Services Company, LLC and Enron North America Corp.
3. Hess Energy Trading Company, LLC and
a. Enron Liquid Fuels, Inc
b. Enron Capital & Trading Resources Singapore Pte. Ltd.
c. Enron Capital & Trade Resources International Corp.
I am told that trading with Amerada Hess Corporation and Hess Energy
Services Company, LLC via Enron On-line is restricted by Enron due to the
lack of an ISDA Master Agreement. Therefore, an expeditious conclusion of
agreement would be most appreciated.
To expedite the negotiations, perhaps we can use the ISDA Master Agreement
between Hess Energy Trading Company, LLC and Enron Capital & Trade Resources
Corp. dated January 29, 1998 as the starting point.
As with January 29, 1998 agreement, Amerada Hess Corporation will be the
Credit Support Provider for Hess Energy Services Company, LLC and Hess
Energy Trading Company, LLC. Attached is the most recent standard form of
guaranty.
<<STANDARD GUARANTY (HESS).doc>>
Please revert at your earliest convenience.
Thank you.
Charles F. Cerria, Esq.,
Manager of Compliance
Telephone (212-536-8531)
Facsimile (917-342-8810)
- STANDARD GUARANTY (HESS).doc
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
can you check with bob again, because i got confirms on the deals. the
broker told me yesterday he forgot to tell bob.
Kate Symes @ ECT 11/30/2000 06:05 PM
To: Kerri Thompson/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:
Subject: Re: tfs checkout
Bob does not recognize these deals, and tried to check with the broker. He'll
talk to TFS in the morning to verify these and I'll let you know ASAP.
Thanks,
Kate
Kerri Thompson@ENRON
11/30/2000 02:32 PM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: tfs checkout
missing 2 deals for bob:
buy el paso
cal 01
141.00
25 mw
pv
on peak
sell ees
cal 01
141.05
25 mw
pv
on peak
thanks
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
Tana,
The Forcenergy amendment should be like the HS Resources document we just
executed. The changes are as follows:
New Collateral Threshold: $7,500,000
We are reducing the strike price on all oil hedges (all oil deals) by $.17.
All oil and gas deals are now "Exempt Transactions" (Yes, all deals are
exempt, but we are just changing the strike price on the oil pieces).
We need to back-date the contract to be effective July 1, so we can capture
the August settlements. ( I think this will do.)
If you need anything else, please let me know.
JS
From: Tana Jones on 08/04/2000 09:26 AM
To: John Suttle/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Force Energy
All's I need now is your email w/instructions.
----- Forwarded by Tana Jones/HOU/ECT on 08/04/2000 09:25 AM -----
Larry Joe Hunter
08/04/2000 09:16 AM
To: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: John Suttle/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Force Energy
Tana,
See attached for all Live Forcenergy deals.
Thanks,
Joe
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
Hello all!
Just a reminder that Jeff Richter is patiently waiting in Mt. Hood to inform
all interested candidates about the Day Ahead Scheduling position. Stop by to
find out more information! (He will begin his presentation in just a few
moments.)
--------------------- Forwarded by Grace Rodriguez/PDX/ECT on 04/24/2001
10:57 AM ---------------------------
Amy FitzPatrick
04/23/2001 09:04 AM
To: Portland West Desk
cc:
Subject: Day Ahead Scheduling Opportunity!
A position has recently become available on the California desk reporting to
Jeff Richter. Jeff will be holding an information session on Tuesday, April
24, 2001 at 11:00 am in Mt. Hood for anyone who would like to learn more
about this opportunity. Interested candidates should let Amy FitzPatrick
know by close of business on Friday, April 27, 2001.
Day Ahead Scheduling/Analyst
This individual is responsible for the physical and financial integrity of
Day-Ahead scheduled energy transactions. This includes managing schedules
and preserving Enron,s financial rights with non-performing trading
counterparties.
In addition, the Day Ahead scheduler is responsible for some trading of
energy in the California ISO and bilateral markets both on Enron Online and
through the broker market. Traders are expected to initiate profitable
trades while maintaining an acceptable amount of risk exposure to the
company. The individual is expected to know all settlements requirements and
charges related to each type of trade. The trading role requires interfacing
with internal and external customers and other desks within West Power
Trading.
The Day Ahead scheduler is required to administer terms of Service Desk
contracts, which may include the selling of excess generation and purchasing
energy for customer,s load requirement. Also, the individual is responsible
for gathering and reporting information on unit outages, transmission line
derations and other information that is useful for all West Desk Trading
activity.
Job Duties
? Confirm purchases and sale of power for Enron Power Marketing
? Create and manage daily position spreadsheet
? Involves some weekends
? Work closely with volume, risk management, and dispute settlement groups
? Assist in the resolution of volume discrepancies within an ISO market
? Interface with service and middle marketing customers to resolve Day-Ahead
questions and concerns
? Assist in testing and implementation of the scheduling applications
? Work closely with information technology and fundamentals group to maintain
and develop Day-Ahead tools and systems
? Learn SQL programming to enhance data analysis
Qualifications
? Bachelors in Finance, Business, Accounting or related field
? 1 to 2 years of previous power industry experience in WSCC is preferred.
? Excellent problem solving and communication skills
? Working knowledge of Excel, Access is required. Knowledge of Visual Basic
and SQL is preferred.
? Self motivated
? Detail oriented
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
Sara, below is the "floating price" definition we discussed. FYI, I talked
to Joe on two other issues: (1) He agreed that longer-term it would be
desirable to come up with a form-generating technology such that a definition
of "Delivery Date" is inserted only when relevant (i.e., triggered by the
particular reference price mentioned), so we will keep that in mind, and (2)
He is aware of the errors in the "Cash Settlement Amount" definition
("Multiplied" is capitalized; "price" in "Strike Price Differential" is not;
a couple of spaces don't belong, etc.). I didn't completely understand his
explanation, but it was something to the effect that this had snuck in from
an ERMS form and he is already talking to the right person about getting it
fixed.
Robert E. Bruce
Senior Counsel
Enron North America Corp.
T (713) 345-7780
F (713) 646-3393
[email protected]
----- Forwarded by Robert Bruce/NA/Enron on 10/26/2000 11:48 AM -----
Robert Bruce
Sent by: Robert Bruce
10/26/2000 11:48 AM
To: Larry Joe Hunter/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject:
As we discussed, here is the language for the "Floating Price" definition:
The arithmetic average of the daily prices for all calendar days during the
Calculation Period, the price for each such calendar day being the "Flow
date: Midpoint: Citygates: Chicago - LDCs, large e-us" price as published
under the heading "Daily Price Survey" in Gas Daily
Robert E. Bruce
Senior Counsel
Enron North America Corp.
T (713) 345-7780
F (713) 646-3393
[email protected]
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
I can't make the call on Thursday. I'm not sure that Sheila can either.
I'll leave the go/no go Enron vote to Sheila.
Kay
From: Suzanne Adams@ECT on 06/05/2001 03:16 PM
To: Sheila Tweed/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ben Jacoby/Enron@EnronXGate, Lisa
Bills/Enron@EnronXGate, Roseann Engeldorf/Enron@EnronXGate, Scott
Dieball/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENt, [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], Bill Williams/ENRON@enronXgate, Ed B Hearn
III/HOU/ECT@ECT, John G Rigby/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc:
Subject: WEEKLY CONFERENCE CALL - DATE CHANGE
The weekly GE conference call will be held on Thursday, June 7, 2001, at 1:30
p.m. CDT.
Dial In: 1-888-285-4585
Participant: 536220
Host: 121970 (Sheila)
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
fyi
----- Forwarded by Mark E Haedicke/HOU/ECT on 02/20/2001 03:05 PM -----
Michael Guerriero@ENRON
02/20/2001 02:56 PM
To: Mark E Haedicke/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Arcor Executed Dash
Here are the three approved Documents. They have all been executed.
MFG
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
What are we doing to cover scheduling over the holiday weekend?
-----Original Message-----
From: Sarnowski, Julie
Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2002 1:17 PM
To: O'Neil, Murray P.; Sheppard, Kathryn; Gang, Lisa; Cavanaugh, Darren
Subject: I will be out of the office July 3rd
Happy 4th!
-Julie
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
Daren the stuff outlined in bold execpt for the Helmerich and Payne will be
spot tickets per Vance due to no flow till after the 1st.. All the engage
stuff in Vances file will be spot deals as they were last month that totals
1904. Also in Vances file is the EEX Corporation stuff that will also be
spot tickets that totals 12945. Every thing else is a go. Let lme know if
you need anything else I am to please.
---------------------- Forwarded by Tom Acton/Corp/Enron on 05/25/2000 08:21
AM ---------------------------
Vance L Taylor@ECT
05/24/2000 05:57 PM
To: Tom Acton/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:
Subject: May Nom
Tom,
Here's the latest and greatest.
vlt
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
Claudette, Dana & Carolyn,
Sending this e-mail to remind you of the revival at Shaw Tabernacle UMC
on Friday at 7:30 pm. The directions are 45S or 59S to 610E. 601E to
Wayside. Exit Wayside and turn left under 610. Take Wayside to Birmingham
and turn right on Birmingham. Birmingham dead ends into the church. Try
and be there on time, because the church fills up pretty quickly.
Also remember the Seeds of Praise workshop on Saturday from 9:00 am to
2:00 pm at Mt. Corinth UMC in Humble. Take 1960 towards Humble. Take the
"Y" in the road when going into Humble onto Old Humble Road. The church is
about 1 to 1 1/2 miles down on the right. If you pass Super K-Mart on the
left, turn around you have gone to far. Breakfast will be served promptly
at 9:00 am. I have already paid for all members going from Veterans, so we
can settle up later.
Don't forget the picnic is on Sunday after service. If you haven't
signed up to bring anything contact Danise Johnson to see what is still
needed.
If you need any other info, please contact me: (281)872-1197 Home
(713)696-6878 Work
(832)567-8674 Cell
(713)605-2405 Pager
Be Blessed,
Denise
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
-----Original Message-----
From: Baughman Jr., Don
Sent: Tuesday, July 31, 2001 5:10 PM
To: Will, Lloyd
Subject: RE: Traffic Report outage and new product enhancements
Hey, what is the login for Fried Wire?
Thanks,
Don
-----Original Message-----
From: Will, Lloyd
Sent: Tuesday, July 31, 2001 8:07 AM
To: Hernandez, Juan; Baughman Jr., Don; Bentley, Corry
Subject: FW: Traffic Report outage and new product enhancements
Note the new ATC features below.
-----Original Message-----
From: "Stuart Wright" <[email protected]>@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22Stuart+20Wright+22+20+3Cstuart+40friedwire+2Ecom+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent: Monday, July 30, 2001 2:58 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Traffic Report outage and new product enhancements
To Our Valued Traffic Report Clients,
Today, FriedWire's Traffic Report experienced a disruption in service as a result of network and general connectivity problems caused by third parties. We apologize for this inconvenience and are working with all of our partners to insure that this does not happen again. As always, we remain committed to providing you power markets information around-the-clock.
Product Update
FriedWire has just added significant new content and capability to the Traffic Report, which areoutlined below. Please contact us for brief, online tutorials on how to use the new features.
NOAA Climate Prediction Center (CPC) Weather Forecasts
3-7 day Maximum Temperatures
6-10 day Outlook and Temperature Probability
8-14 day Prognostic Temperature Anomaly
Excessive Heat Outlooks (for the same time periods listed above)
Precipitation Outlooks and Anomalies
***You may also be able to set up e-mail notification services to alert you when the new forecasts become available so that you don't have to continually check to see if the new data have been posted.
Available Transmission Capacity
FriedWire has developed a new interface that will allow you to search for available transmission by path. The new geographic interface will allow you to choose a path and then view the detailed ATC offerings and then navigate to easily see reverse-path information, thru-path offerings, offerings from non-path providers and more.
***E-mail and wireless text-paging notification services are now available along with the new ATC interface. Now, you can be automatically notified when new ATCs are posted by providers or on paths that you track ongoingly. You can custom define your alerts according to the provider, path, service increment, time period, class, etc.that you're interested in, as well as define when you want to be contacted (days of the week, time of day, times per day, etc.).
The following additional product upgrades have been deployed:
All hourly offerings are now reflected in military time designations.
Hourly ATC selection reflected now as a range (i.e.; 13:00 - 14:00) instead of hour-beginning 1:00 PM.
Eight new flowgates have been added for Sierra-Pacific Power and 74 for MidAmerican Energy. They all have Intertie Profiles and can be located by selecting "View All Interties". All will be located and plotted on the power flow maps in the next couple of weeks.
You can now add one (or multiple) e-mail and text-page addresses easily in order to get Alerts from the Traffic Report. Simply click on the link that says "My Account" at the top right-hand corner of any Traffic Report screen and look for the link just to the right of the E-mail * input field that says Enter additional e-mails. Go to the Add an E-mail Contact link at the bottom of the next screen.
We hope you enjoy and find useful the new version of the Traffic Report. Please stay tuned for more exciting additions in the near future.
Sincerely,
Bill Townsend
President
FriedWire Inc.
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
DJ Texas Power Export Capacity Returns To Normal
HOUSTON (Dow Jones)--Southwestern Electric Power Co. confirmed Monday that a
breaker problem near the 600-megawatt eastern direct-current tie has been
repaired, allowing exports from Texas to return to normal.
The breaker problem, which began last month at the coal-fired Welsh plant
in
Cason, Texas, could have lasted all summer, the utility had warned the
Independent System Operator for the Electric Reliability Council of Texas.
The breaker problem had limited exports by 100 MW from Ercot into the
adjacent
Southwest Power Pool.
SWEPCO is a unit of American Electric Power (AEP).
The east DC tie connects the transmission network of TXU Electric and
SWEPCO.
The east DC tie is the larger of two devices in the state, which allow a
combined 800 MW of power to be imported or exported from Ercot to SPP.
Ercot's northern DC tie, which connects the West Texas Utilities Co.
system to
Public Service Co. of Oklahoma, is rated at 220 MW.
-By Eileen O'Grady, Dow Jones Newswires; 713-547-9213;
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
(END) Dow Jones Newswires 07-05-01
2058GMT
(AP-DJ-05-07-01 2058GMT)
:TICKER: AEP
:SUBJECT: EUTL DI1 DI4 STMG OH TX
Copyright (c) 2001 Dow Jones and Company, Inc.
Received by NewsEDGE/LAN: 5/7/01 4:04 PM
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
This path just looks like it will be cut........... please take a moment to
look at it.
Also,
It is very important that you document when you cannot Reach Morgan Stanley's
real time. An e-mail will do, send it to me.
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
Sheung,
We will be opening an account at Morgan Stanley for Enron India LLC (a
Delaware Company). They expect to participate in an IPO on June 13th for
Nasdaq shares.
Sara will be forwarding the documentation to you.
Sheila
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
Attached is the hot list update for Monday's meeting. It has been a few weeks since we have reviewed it, so please take a good look at it and roll over any remaining Q2 deals to Q3.
E-mail your changes back to me.
Thanks.
Phil
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
Do you have a distribution list to send this to all the traders.
Phillip
---------------------- Forwarded by Phillip K Allen/HOU/ECT on 04/04/2001
07:11 AM ---------------------------
To: Fred Lagrasta/HOU/ECT@ECT, Phillip K Allen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott
Neal/HOU/ECT@ECT, James W Lewis/HOU/EES@EES
cc:
Subject: EES Gas Desk Happy Hour
Fred/Phillip/Scott: We are having a happy hour at Sambuca this Thursday,
please be our guests and invite anyone on your desks that would be interested
in meeting some of the new gas desk team.
http://www.americangreetings.com/pickup.pd?i=172082367&m=1891
Thank you,
Jess
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
----- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 06/21/2000 08:39 AM -----
Sara Shackleton
06/21/2000 08:39 AM
To: [email protected]
cc:
Subject: Differences
Jason: Please stay in touch with Sarah. We really do need to finalize with
Bank One by Friday!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
----- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 06/21/2000 08:38 AM -----
Sarah Wesner@ENRON
06/20/2000 07:24 PM
To: Joseph Deffner/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Differences
Joe - attached is a first shot at getting a handle on all the differences
between the proposed and existing margin lines. I plan to do more analysis
with respect to covenants and warranties but this hits the main points. The
analysis between rates will be very complex and may be something best left to
the research Group. We can go through why this is such a complex issue to
model. What I do plan to do is update historical info. so that based on the
past we can make general statements such as over time Fed Funds + X bp <,>,=
to LIBOR + X bp.
A quick synapses of difficult items:
Commissions vs. Margin lines - will trading desk use facility for many trades
or less frequent trades for smaller amounts
Short on Financial gas vs. Long on physical gas - cash flow differentials and
how we can model the cost of cash to fund the working capital (as you
explained to me today)
What positions the trader take and how our equity position is at that exact
time. Will we trade in a similar fashion in the future?
From what I understand the trading desks do not have ready access to the
above information in a format which lends itself to modelling of reasonable
complexity or do not wish to share it with us (understandable considering the
sensitive nature of the business.) The ideal situation would be for the
desks to decide themselves whether a line makes sense for them based on the
pricing provided. As mentioned above, I believe that we should be able to
explain why a certain base rate would be attractive but am not sure how to
estimate the value of a line to the traders without detailed information.
Perhaps the best division of labour would be for the desks to decide what
loan would be most valuable based on the desk's trading patterns while we
could focus on getting the line in place as quickly as possible. If you
disagree, please let me know and I will try to rethink how to model this
appropriately.
Sarah
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
Hi Vince!
Yes, meeting for dinner Tuesday night is great!
I'll be coming in on Tuesday from D.C. and I'll be taking the Train to New
York on Wednesday morning.
See you and Ken Tuesday at 5:30 at the Inn at Penn Lobby.
Hope you both have a great weekend!!
Thanks!
--Christie.
----- Forwarded by Christie Patrick/HOU/ECT on 02/16/2001 11:23 AM -----
Vince J Kaminski
02/16/2001 11:04 AM
To: Christie Patrick/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Kenneth Parkhill/NA/Enron@ENRON, Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: change-video to teleconferences-Enron
Christie,
Meeting at 5:30 is fine with me. The presentation is at 6:30.
I sent you a message regarding a dinner on Tuesday.
Can you join me and Ken Parkhill?
Vince
From: Christie Patrick on 02/16/2001 10:19 AM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: change-video to teleconferences-Enron
Hi Vince!
Thanks for the information below!
I spoke with Tom Piazze today. I'll be meeting with him at 3:30 on the 20th
to discuss the WeBI contract. I'll also be meeting with Wharton's broadband
(technical people) before our meeting with the students. Further, I hope to
meet with the people in charge of the Business Plan Competition.
Tom suggested you might want to call Howard Kurnreuther (sp?) and possibly
stop in to see him while we are at Wharton.
I'll be getting to Wharton sometime Tuesday; I'll try to get a reservation at
the Inn at Penn. I'll then be leaving early Wednesday morning by train to
New York.
Shall we meet in tha Lobby at the Inn at Penn before going to meet the
students (I think the meeting with the students is at 6pm-ish)--say, 5:30?
Please let me know!
Also, we still need to give Wharton an answer as to whether we're interested
in another $50,000 investment in eFellows.
Thanks Vince!
Have a great wekend!
--Christie.
----- Forwarded by Christie Patrick/HOU/ECT on 02/16/2001 10:13 AM -----
Vince J Kaminski
02/16/2001 10:06 AM
To: Christie Patrick/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kenneth Parkhill/NA/Enron@ENRON
Subject: change-video to teleconferences-Enron
FYI
Vince
---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 02/16/2001
10:06 AM ---------------------------
FAP <[email protected]> on 02/16/2001 08:35:22 AM
To: Clay DeGiacinto <[email protected]>, Deepa Mallik
<[email protected]>, dennis Feerick
<[email protected]>, Heather Thorne
<[email protected]>, Jack Rejtman
<[email protected]>, Jason Cummins
<[email protected]>, Kim Whitsel
<[email protected]>, Nicholas Levitt
<[email protected]>, Omar Bassel
<[email protected]>, Ram Vittal <[email protected]>, Steve
Lessar <[email protected]>, Thomas
<[email protected]>, Tulika Bhalla <[email protected]>,
Vincent Chen <[email protected]>
cc: FAP <[email protected]>, "'[email protected]'"
<[email protected]>, "'[email protected]'"
<[email protected]>
Subject: change-video to teleconferences-Enron
3/1 SHDH 215
3/22 SHDH 215
3/29 SHDH 215
Please note that the remaining videoconferences scheduled with Enron have
been changed to teleconferences due to the difficulties we have experienced.
The host has agreed and we will, therefore, continue with teleconferences in
the same locations/dates as noted above.
Any questions, please contact the FAP office.
Thanks,
Donna
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.