text
stringlengths 1
1.59M
| meta
dict |
|---|---|
Start Date: 12/15/01; DayAhead market; No ancillary schedules awarded. Variances detected.
Variances detected in Energy Import/Export schedule.
Variances detected in Load schedule.
LOG MESSAGES:
PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final Schedules\2001121516.txt
---- Energy Import/Export Schedule ----
$$$ Variance found in table tblINTCHG_IMPEXP.
Details: (Hour: 4 / Preferred: 50.00 / Final: 49.99)
TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
SC_ID: ECTstCA
MKT_TYPE: 1
TRANS_DATE: 12/15/01
TIE_POINT: MALIN_5_RNDMTN
INTERCHG_ID: ENRJ_CISO_3001
ENGY_TYPE: FIRM
---- Load Schedule ----
$$$ Variance found in table tblLoads.
Details: (Hour: 11 / Preferred: 2.95 / Final: 2.94)
TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
LOAD_ID: PGE1
MKT_TYPE: 1
TRANS_DATE: 12/15/01
SC_ID: ENRJ
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
Please follow up with this. Jeff
---------------------- Forwarded by Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT on 10/02/2000
02:18 PM ---------------------------
Rick Bergsieker@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
09/25/2000 11:50 AM
To: Jeffrey A Shankman@ECT, Mike McConnell/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Doug Arnell
At our LNG coordination meeting in London last Friday, I asked Doug Arnell to
be the point person tocoordinate the assembly of a quick data base of all of
our LNG sources and uses and ship availability over the next several years.
He will work with Merritt Thomas, Brad Hitch and Eric Groves and will
coordinate all of his work with Eric Gonzales.
The purpose of this exercise is to give us, in light of the fact that we do
not have an operational LNG book, a quick picture of the overall situation
so that we can make some quick calls on Hoegh Galleon, Abu Dhabi etc.
I have noted that Doug has since started copying the two of you on lots of
emails. I will ask him to take the two of you out of the details on this for
now so that we don't overload your email inboxes, unless you want to see all
of the details.
I will screen the emails and forward you info to keep you in the loop but at
a higher altitude without all of the gory details.
Please advise
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
W E E K E N D S Y S T E M S A V A I L A B I L I T Y
F O R
June 8, 2001 5:00pm through June 11, 2001 12:00am
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ECS to ECN Network Interconnection, June 9th 2001 POSTPONED
This is a notification that the Enron Corp. I/T Networks team will be connecting the new building network infrastructure located in Enron Center South (ECS) to the existing Enron Center North (ECN) backbone network. While this activity is not expected to produce a disruption to network services, this notice is designed to alert the organization to our activities. No network hardware or systems are anticipated to be shutdown. The actual physical interconnection of the networks will be performed in the EB 34th floor Data Center.
Interconnection activities are scheduled to occur the evening of June 9th 2001 starting from 7:00 p.m.(CT) and completing around 11:00 p.m. (CT). Application testing activities will begin at 11:00 p.m. (CT) once all network testing has completed.
If you have any further questions, please contact Pete Castrejana at 713-410-0642 for more information.
SCHEDULED SYSTEM OUTAGES:
ARDMORE DATA CENTER - FACILITY OPERATIONS: No Scheduled Outages.
AZURIX: No Scheduled Outages.
EB34 DATA CENTER - FACILITY OPERATIONS: No Scheduled Outages.
EDI SERVER: No Scheduled Outages.
ENRON CENTER SOUTH DATA CENTER - FACILITY OPERATIONS: No Scheduled Outages
ENRON NORTH AMERICAN LANS:
Impact: ENS
Time: Fri 6/8/2001 at 10:30:00 PM CT thru Fri 6/8/2001 at 11:30:00 PM CT
Fri 6/8/2001 at 8:30:00 PM PT thru Fri 6/8/2001 at 9:30:00 PM PT
Sat 6/9/2001 at 4:30:00 AM London thru Sat 6/9/2001 at 5:30:00 AM London
Outage: Upgrade code on Ardmore routers
Environments Impacted: Ardmore
Purpose: There is a bug with the version of code that we are using that causes the switches to crash.
Backout:
Contact(s): Scott Shishido 713-853-9780
Impact: CORP
Time: Fri 6/8/2001 at 5:30:00 PM CT thru Fri 6/8/2001 at 8:30:00 PM CT
Fri 6/8/2001 at 3:30:00 PM PT thru Fri 6/8/2001 at 6:30:00 PM PT
Fri 6/8/2001 at 11:30:00 PM London thru Sat 6/9/2001 at 2:30:00 AM London
Outage: Split VLAN 468 into a /27 network
Environments Impacted: Corp
Purpose: Separate the load and traffic between AEXT, AEIN, & AX environments
Backout:
Contact(s): Morgan Gothard 713-345-7387
Impact: CORP
Time: Fri 6/8/2001 at 5:30:00 PM CT thru Fri 6/8/2001 at 6:30:00 PM CT
Fri 6/8/2001 at 3:30:00 PM PT thru Fri 6/8/2001 at 4:30:00 PM PT
Fri 6/8/2001 at 11:30:00 PM London thru Sat 6/9/2001 at 12:30:00 AM London
Outage: AEINFW swap
Environments Impacted: Corp
Purpose: Eminent growth and related stability issues.
Backout: Reinstall original units
Contact(s): Morgan Gothard 713-345-7387
FIELD SERVICES: No Scheduled Outages.
INTERNET: No Scheduled Outages.
MESSAGING:
Impact: Exchange
Time: Sat 6/9/2001 at 12:00:00 PM CT thru Sat 6/9/2001 at 2:00:00 PM CT
Sat 6/9/2001 at 10:00:00 AM PT thru Sat 6/9/2001 at 12:00:00 PM PT
Sat 6/9/2001 at 6:00:00 PM London thru Sat 6/9/2001 at 8:00:00 PM London
Outage: Apply latest hotfixes to Nahou-msmbx03v & Nahou-msmbx05v
Environments Impacted: Exchange Users on Nahou-msmbx03v & 05v
Purpose: Ensure backups and data integrity
Backout: Uninstall Hotfixes
Contact(s): Scott Albright 713-345-9381
Tim Hudson 713-853-9289
MARKET DATA:
Impact: CORP
Time: Fri 6/8/2001 at 5:00:00 PM CT thru Fri 6/8/2001 at 7:00:00 PM CT
Fri 6/8/2001 at 3:00:00 PM PT thru Fri 6/8/2001 at 5:00:00 PM PT
Fri 6/8/2001 at 11:00:00 PM London thru Sat 6/9/2001 at 1:00:00 AM London
Outage: Market Data TV systems upgrades
Environments Impacted: Trading Floors
Purpose: Increase system reliability and systems management, also allow presentation of new infrastructure content to the trading floor plasma screens
Backout: re-install original systems
Contact(s): John Sieckman 713-345-7862
NT: No Scheduled Outages.
OS/2: No Scheduled Outages.
OTHER SYSTEMS: ALSO SEE ORIGINAL REPORT
Impact: CORP
Time: Fri 6/8/2001 at 7:30:00 PM CT thru Fri 6/8/2001 at 9:30:00 PM CT
Fri 6/8/2001 at 5:30:00 PM PT thru Fri 6/8/2001 at 7:30:00 PM PT
Sat 6/9/2001 at 1:30:00 AM London thru Sat 6/9/2001 at 3:30:00 AM London
Outage: NAMEX-LN1 and NAMTY-LN1- Needs Rebooting
Environments Impacted: Local Office
Purpose: Need to reload NETIQ Agents for NAMTY-LN1 and NAMEX-LN1
Backout:
Contact(s): Wilma Bleshman 713-853-1562
Impact:
Time: Sat 6/9/2001 at 10:00:00 PM CT thru Sun 6/10/2001 at 1:30:00 AM CT
Sat 6/9/2001 at 8:00:00 PM PT thru Sat 6/9/2001 at 11:30:00 PM PT
Sun 6/10/2001 at 4:00:00 AM London thru Sun 6/10/2001 at 7:30:00 AM London
Outage: Upgrade for E10K SSP tremor requires downtime on server moe.
Environments Impacted: Global
Purpose: An SSP is the controlling server for an E10K platform. Moe is a domain on the E10K platform named aftershock. In order to complete the upgrade of moe, we must first upgrade the SSP. The first phase will entail upgrading the SSP to Solaris 8 and the SSP software.
Backout: The SSP is really a new server that needs to be configured. The old SSP will be there if we need to back out.
Contact(s): Malcolm Wells 713-345-3716
SITARA: No Scheduled Outages.
SUN/OSS SYSTEM: No Scheduled Outages.
TELEPHONY: SEE ORIGINAL REPORT
TERMINAL SERVER: No Scheduled Outages.
UNIFY: SEE ORIGINAL REPORT
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FOR ASSISTANCE
(713) 853-1411 Enron Resolution Center
Specific Help:
Information Risk Management (713) 853-5536
SAP/ISC (713) 345-4727
Unify On-Call (713) 284-3757 [Pager]
Sitara On-Call (713) 288-0101 [Pager]
RUS/GOPS/GeoTools/APRS (713) 639-9726 [Pager]
OSS/UA4/TARP (713) 285-3165 [Pager]
CPR (713) 284-4175 [Pager]
EDI Support (713) 327-3893 [Pager]
EES Help Desk (713)853-9797 OR (888)853-9797
TDS -Trader Decision Support On-Call (713) 327-6032 [Pager]
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
Tanya:
Is there a way to identify outstanding financial/physical positions with respect to these products?
I'd like to cross check to see which counterparties have sent termination notices.
I've already spoken to Bob who will compile his list for me to track.
Sara Shackleton
Enron Wholesale Services
1400 Smith Street, EB3801a
Houston, TX 77002
Ph: (713) 853-5620
Fax: (713) 646-3490
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
---------------------- Forwarded by Sally Beck/HOU/ECT on 11/27/2000 05:32 PM
---------------------------
Enron North America Corp.
From: Sally Beck 11/27/2000 05:34 PM
To: Sally Beck/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: PreRank Sheets
Ignore this first reply. I am scheduled for too many PRC meetings, so I had
my dates confused. I will get you pre-rankings before the 29th. You have
left Brent Price off of the list, a VP who reports to me. Is Rick Causey
planning to pre-rank Brent, or does he want me to handle that? Do your
records not show that Brent reports to me? I approved his reviewers in the
PEP system. --Sally
Enron North America Corp.
From: Sally Beck 11/27/2000 04:38 PM
To: Kimberly Rizzi/HOU/ECT@ENRON
cc:
Subject: Re: PreRank Sheets
The Energy Operations PRC meeting will be held on December 8th. At that
time, I will have information for you to load for Rick's PRC meeting on the
12th. I would prefer to give you that information on the 8th, rather than
guessing at a ranking now or taking the time of my direct reports to go
through this process before our meeting on December 8th. They are all busy
with the details of reviewing over 400 people in preparation for our December
8th meeting. Please let me know if you can make this schedule work for you.
Thanks.
From: Kimberly Rizzi @ ENRON 11/27/2000 02:04 PM
Sent by: Jennifer Jordan@ENRON
To: Sally Beck/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Jennifer Jordan/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Donald Miller/Corp/Enron@Enron, Sheila
Walton/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: PreRank Sheets
Sally,
Attached is a spreadsheet with pull down boxes allowing you to assign
preliminary rankings of your people. If you have any questions please let me
know.
Please assign preliminary ratings and return the spreadsheet to me by close
of business Wednesday, November 29th.
Thanks,
Kim
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
I'm sorry. Eric and I aren't speaking at the moment due to creative
differences. I want only the orange M&M's removed from our dressing room and
he wants only the brown ones removed.
[email protected] on 02/18/2000 09:05:55 AM
To: [email protected]
cc:
Subject: EMERGENCY BAND NOTICE
Date: February 18, 2000
From: Ruppert, Ryan F. R9RUPPE - AMERICAS
To: EXT-GERALD.NEMEC(A)ENRON.COM, GERALDNE - FPEXMAIL
Subject: EMERGENCY BAND NOTICE
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The word on the street is that the Gillaspie Drum Fund is being converted
into the Gillaspie Home Improvement Fund. THIS IS SERIOUS. We all need to
do our part in brainwashing Eric into the "band is bigger than the house"
mentality. Please do your part.
Thanks,
Ryan Ruppert
Rhythm Guitarist
The Band With No Name
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
Dear Acquiring Shippers,
The attached memo discusses the impact of the Topock allocation on your
rights as acquiring shippers.? Please read the memo and give me a call (213
244-3832) if I can be of further assistance.? Have a Great Thanksgiving.
??????? ??????? ??????? ??????? ??????? ??????? ??????? ??????? Thanks,? Bob
Betonte
<<AcqShipper.doc>>
- AcqShipper.doc
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
HTTP/1.1 200
Server: Netscape-Enterprise/3.6 SP2
Date: Sat, 07 Apr 2001 06:21:05 GMT
Content-type: text/x-oasis-csv
Connection: close
REQUEST_STATUS=200
ERROR_MESSAGE=
TIME_STAMP=20010407012106PD
VERSION=1.4
TEMPLATE=transstatus
OUTPUT_FORMAT=DATA
PRIMARY_PROVIDER_CODE=SPP
PRIMARY_PROVIDER_DUNS=959415852
RETURN_TZ=PD
DATA_ROWS=1
COLUMN_HEADERS=CONTINUATION_FLAG,ASSIGNMENT_REF,SELLER_CODE,SELLER_DUNS,CUSTOM
ER_CODE,CUSTOMER_DUNS,AFFILIATE_FLAG,PATH_NAME,POINT_OF_RECEIPT,POINT_OF_DELIV
ERY,SOURCE,SINK,CAPACITY_REQUESTED,CAPACITY_GRANTED,SERVICE_INCREMENT,TS_CLASS
,TS_TYPE,TS_PERIOD,TS_WINDOW,TS_SUBCLASS,NERC_CURTAILMENT_PRIORITY,OTHER_CURTA
ILMENT_PRIORITY,START_TIME,STOP_TIME,CEILING_PRICE,OFFER_PRICE,BID_PRICE,PRICE
_UNITS,PRECONFIRMED,ANC_SVC_LINK,ANC_SVC_REQ,POSTING_REF,SALE_REF,REQUEST_REF,
DEAL_REF,IMPACTED,COMPETING_REQUEST_FLAG,REQ
UEST_TYPE,RELATED_REF,NEGOTIATED_PRICE_FLAG,STATUS,STATUS_NOTIFICATION,STATUS_
COMMENTS,TIME_QUEUED,RESPONSE_TIME_LIMIT,TIME_OF_LAST_UPDATE,PRIMARY_PROVIDER_
COMMENTS,SELLER_REF,SELLER_COMMENTS,CUSTOMER_COMMENTS,SELLER_NAME,SELLER_PHONE
,SELLER_FAX,SELLER_EMAIL,CUSTOMER_NAME,CUSTOMER_PHONE,CUSTOMER_FAX,CUSTOMER_EM
AIL,REASSIGNED_REF,REASSIGNED_CAPACITY,REASSIGNED_START_TIME,REASSIGNED_STOP_T
IME
N,SPP
01007292,SPP,959415852,EPMI,848921276,N,CONTROL/HILLTOP,SVR55,HIL345,"CISO","P
ACE",12,12,HOURLY,NON-FIRM,POINT_TO_POINT,PEAK,FIXED,W/O ANCILLARY
SRVCS,1,,20010407060000PD,20010407100000PD,6.9000,6.9000,6.9000,MW-HR,Y,SC:(SP
P:RQ);,SC:M;,,,,,0,N,ORIGINAL,,,QUEUED,MAILTO:[email protected];,,20010406
232050PD,20010406235100PD,20010406232050PD,,,,,Carolyn
Bonari,(775)834-4180,(775)834-4296,[email protected],Don
Norman,,(503)464-3740,[email protected],,,,
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
Hi Steve,
Here's what NJR received.
Kay
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 02/14/2001 09:29
AM ---------------------------
Kay Mann
02/09/2001 03:58 PM
To: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected]
cc: Steve Montovano/NA/Enron@Enron, Jeffery Ader/HOU/ECT@ECT, Heather
Kroll/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Letter of Intent
Gentlemen,
Attached for your review is a draft of the letter of intent.
Please let me know if you have any difficulty opening this document.
Kay
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
There is a potential that counterparties will allow us to promote a small group of individuals simultaneous to deal closure. To facilitate that process, please provide a list of those individuals you would like to promote along with a brief explanation to your HR generalist no later than 12:00 pm on Thursday, January 10, 2002.
Please keep in mind that the nominee should have been in his or her current role for at least a year and received a 3 or better rating during the mid-year PRC process.
Listed below are your HR contacts.
Gas Trading and Gas Origination Jeanie Slone
Power Trading and Origination/EOL Amy FitzPatrick
Tax/Accounting/Legal/Credit/Treasury/IT Infrastructure Sarah Zarkowsky
IT Development Mandy Curless
GRA/Weather Anne Labbe
Settlements/Risk/Volume Management/Document/Energy Ops Tana Cashion
Your HR representative will be contacting you in the next day to review your employee lists as well as discuss any promotions.
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
Dear Judge Biren:
Transwestern Pipeline Company will be offering the following exhibits:
1. Prepared Direct Testimony of Jeffery C. Fawcett on Behalf of
Transwestern Pipeline Company in Support of the Comprehensive Settlement
Agreement (Exhibit 12, incorporating Exhibit JCF-1) and
2. Prepared Rebuttal Testimony of Jeffery C. Fawcett on Behalf of
Transwestern Pipeline Company in Support of the Comprehensive Settlement
Agreement (Exhibit 17).
Transwestern estimates it will need less than 10 minutes for direct
testimony. Transwestern does not at this time intend to cross-examine any
witnesses; however, it reserves the right to request a reasonable amount of
time to examine witnesses on issues affecting Transwestern to the extent that
any party's live testimony differs from or conflicts with its prepared
testimony.
Susan Scott
Transwestern Pipeline Company
(713) 853-0596
[email protected]
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
I have talked with the San Juan team and all are aware of the upcoming meeting. The team leader is Tracy Kuehl but Chris Gaston, Jeff Grieder, Tom Murphy, Blackie Foutz who are on the team can all help with this project. I will be out of the office until Feb. 5, 2001 but I can be reached by pager, 877-726-7034, or cell phone, 713-304-1021. My pager has the capability of accepting alpha messages. You can send them through Lotus Notes with the address of [email protected]. Do not enter a subject. Just type in the message area. Please include you name at the end so I will know who it's from. If you can set up a meeting after Feb. 5 (preferably Feb. 8 or 9) I would appreciate it so I can attend.
Ron M.
Jeffery Fawcett
01/24/2001 05:39 PM
To: Ronald Matthews/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc: Eric Faucheaux/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Rich Jolly/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Rick Smith/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Team San-Juan/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Steven Harris/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Kevin Hyatt/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Mary Kay Miller/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Susan Scott/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
Subject: Ameramex Project- Bloomfield
Rick Moore with Ameramex called and said their project is moving forward- on a fairly expedited basis. They've recently obtained a City of Farmington pledge of public funds (a precursor to a formal bond issue) to underpin the financing.
To refresh your memory, this project is another "trigeneration" project. Ameramex will use the waste steam from the electric generation turbines to heat a hydroponic lettuce farm, as well as use the combustion carbon dioxide. We've previously provided a route map and estimate (0.75 mi. of 4" pipe, $486K direct/indirect cost) to Ameramex.
Ameramex's financing deal is now dependent upon completion of the interconnect and commencement of service in approx. 7 months. To this end, Ameramax has requested a walk through of the potential route and a revised (if necessary) estimate of the cost to interconnect. There are several other issues to be dealt with here, including what is the final deal structure; including whether TW may possibly providing interim financing until the issuance of the muni bonds.
Rick Moore would like to get together with myself and representatives of operations and/or engineering to survey the route and decide on the ultimate design/configuration of facilities. Depending on the outcome of the survey, he'd like a formal proposal for TW for financing the construction of the lateral and interconnect facilities.
Ron, since you provided all the prior facility planning support, I'd like for you to continue providing the liason support to TW Commercial on this project. I'll also be calling on the San Juan Team to work with you and engineering to optimize the design/routing of this interconnect/lateral pipeline. I'll work with the customer to set-up a site meeting when you return to work after 2/5/01.
To bring you and others up to speed, I've included a couple of the original email(s) giving a little more detail on the estimate and a map of the route:
Ronald Matthews
06/16/2000 03:32 PM
To: Jeffery Fawcett/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc: Terry Galassini/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Rich Jolly/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, David Roensch/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Team San-Juan/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
Subject: Amerimex Energy Farms Project
Jeff,
I talked with the San Juan team and came up with a pipeline route to the proposed Energy Farms site located in S1/2 SE1/4 Sec. 13, T29N, R11W, and the NE1/2 NE1/4 Sec. 24, T29N, R11W all in San Juan County, NM. Per the correspondence, Energy Farms is looking at a delivery around 15 MMcf/d. The best approach to serving this load would be to take gas from the suction side of Bloomfield CS. The 4" pipeline would start there a travel about 0.75 miles to the northwest section of the proposed site (see attached map). A metering facility would be located at the beginning of the pipeline still inside of TW's property along with the other meter facilities. Below is a breakdown of the facility cost. Estimated costs are + 30% and would have to be refined.
0.75 miles of 4" pipeline & side valve $286,500
4" orifice meter run w/ gallagher flow $199,900
conditioner, & flow control
$486,400
There is a possibility that the meter facility costs could be lower by using an existing metering header system but a more detailed review would be required. Please feel free to call if you have any questions. I will send you a copy of the estimated costs for both the pipeline and measurement since they can't be attached.
Jeffery Fawcett
04/18/2000 11:37 AM
To: Steven Harris/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Kevin Hyatt/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Susan Scott/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Lorraine Lindberg/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, TK Lohman/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Christine Stokes/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc: Ronald Matthews/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Terry Galassini/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
Subject: Amerimex Bloomfield Project
Attached see a note I sent to Rick Moore. Rick works for a company called Amerimex. Rick and I worked together in gas supply at EPNG ("the early years"). Amerimex is a developer of "trigeneration" projects. In addition to the subject project for Bloomfield, another one is being considered for Santa Theresa, N.M. If you recall, we were introduced to trigeneration when we were discussing an electric generation plant on the site of a hydroponic tomato greenhouse near Gallup.
Trigeneration is an environmentally friendly technology that utilizes the "byproducts" of electric generation. "Cogeneration" refers to the process where waste heat/steam generated during the combustion of gas turbines is sold commercially (usually to manufacturing facilities) for plant purposes. "Trigeneration," on the other hand, refers the process where not only is the waste heat/steam utilized, but also the carbon dioxide. Therefore, trigeneration is a perfect fit for a greenhouse that requires both heat and carbon dioxide for the plants.
Amerimex has proposed a hydroponic lettuce greenhouse in the Bloomfield, N.M. area. The facility, to be constructed turnkey by United Technologies, would have a nominal rating of 70 MW, resulting in a gas burn of about 15 MMcf/d. The plant would require gas deliveries at approx. 500 psig. The outtake power would be sold both locally and on the grid using a TriStates 69kv transmission line that is proximate to the site. Given the "politically correct" nature of these facilities, the City of Farmington has agreed to fund construction with a $70MM bond.
As you can see, we're in the very earliest stages of conversation. We'll keep the group posted on progress.
---------------------- Forwarded by Jeffery Fawcett/ET&S/Enron on 04/18/2000 10:38 AM ---------------------------
Jeffery Fawcett
04/18/2000 10:38 AM
To: [email protected]
cc: Ronald Matthews/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
Subject: Amerimex Bloomfield Project
Rick,
It was really great visiting with you the other day. It never ceases to amaze me how small a world this is. I hope this project moves forward and we get the opportunity to work together again.
Attached for your use is the schematic you spoke with Ron Matthews about. It's not too terribly detailed, so I don't know if it will be useful or not. We have much more detailed images of the Bloomfield area on our alignments, but without a legal description, we're a little blind.
I don't know if you've had a chance to get the legal description for the proposed plant site yet or not, but if you have it, would you forward that on to me? We could then get started at not only putting together a rough cost estimate for the tap and meter, but we could begin looking for the best route for a lateral line between the facilities.
Look forward to hearing from you soon.
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
Hey guys,
Further to our meeting, here (courtesy of John T) are the addresses to view
the peaker data for our upcoming testing:
a. O:\_Dropbox\PeakerData\Peakers1999.htm
b. O:\_Dropbox\PeakerData\Peakers2000.htm
At the present time, these pages display on Microsoft Internet Explorer only.
Type in the above URLs in the address area of your IE. The pages refresh
automatically once every minute.
Cheers, --Scott
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
Usually Paul Garcia works with Susan Ralph
-----Original Message-----
From: Hayslett, Rod
Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2001 10:00 AM
To: Geaccone, Tracy
Subject: Fw: Five Day Rolling Forecast
How do we get eott requests into the system? Primariy for LC's?
--------------------------
Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld (www.BlackBerry.net)
-----Original Message-----
From: Garcia, Paul <[email protected]>
To: Grajewski, Joseph T. <[email protected]>; Williams, David <[email protected]>; Reeves, Leslie <[email protected]>; Sweeney, Kevin <[email protected]>; Price, Brent A. <[email protected]>; Bruce, Michelle <[email protected]>; Smith, Jeff E. <[email protected]>; Hall, Bob M <[email protected]>; Scott, Laura <[email protected]>; Apollo, Beth <[email protected]>; Whiting, Greg <[email protected]>; Brackett, Debbie R. <[email protected]>; Hodges, Georgeanne <[email protected]>; Nelson, Kimberley <[email protected]>; Choyce, Karen <[email protected]>; Sommers, Jeffrey E. <[email protected]>; Hayslett, Rod <[email protected]>; Patel, Trushar <[email protected]>
CC: DeSpain, Tim <[email protected]>; Freeland, Clint <[email protected]>; Perkins, Mary <[email protected]>
Sent: Wed Nov 28 09:44:29 2001
Subject: Five Day Rolling Forecast
I would like to quickly recap the result of yesterday's meeting. Your five day forecast should be input into the Treasury Forecasting Intranet Website by 3PM daily. The website address is egf.enron.com. It is imperitive that we use the website so that all of the information is compiled in one location.
Every payment is being scrunitized by senior management. Please understand that if your disbursements are not forecasted there is a good chance they may not be paid.
In order to get the ball rolling, I ask that you input your five day forecast by 12 noon today. If you have any question or concerns do not hesitate to call me. Your cooperation is greatly appreciated.
Paul Garcia
713-853-6502 FAX 713-646-2375
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
East is complete
-----Original Message-----
From: Winfree, O'Neal D.
Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 12:36 PM
To: Severson, Russ; Keiser, Kam; Love, Phillip M.; Palmer, B. Scott
Subject: RE: Updating Curve Files to New Environment
tejas is complete... O
-----Original Message-----
From: Severson, Russ
Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 10:49 AM
To: Keiser, Kam; Love, Phillip M.; Winfree, O'Neal D.; Palmer, B. Scott
Subject: FW: Updating Curve Files to New Environment
The IT group would like to turn off the replication of curves tomorrow. Have all the ESTATE curve files been converted per the
instructions below. Any file that has not been updated will not be able to load curves effective Thursday.
If there is any problem with this timing, please contact me.
Thanks
Russ
x37386
-----Original Message-----
From: Severson, Russ
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 5:31 PM
To: Keiser, Kam; Love, Phillip M.; Winfree, O'Neal D.; Palmer, B. Scott
Cc: Gossett, Jeffrey C.
Subject: Updating Curve Files to New Environment
Currently the curves are being published into the old production database and are being replicated to the new Estate environment.
Here are the steps to migrate the Curve files to the new env.
1) Load new ODBC driver utilizing script provided
A) Go to ( Start\Programs\System Utility Applic \ Installation&Diskette Creation)
Double click on "ODBC DSN Entries for ERMT & ESTERMTP"
This will load the correct ODBC on your machine
2) On the Publish tab in the Curve File sheet.
Change the environment name on the 5th row to estermtp
Change the service name on the 5th row to 7550
3) Then hit the << OLE Object: Picture (Metafile) >> button on the publish sheet and save the new file.
If the sheet does not have the button, just save the file, close it, and bring it back up.
4) Save your curves as normal
5) Any questions or problems, please give me a call
Russ
X37386
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
http://rcommerce.us.dell.com/rcomm/config.asp?order_code=rcRC968773-52962
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
-----Original Message-----
From: Sera, Sherri
Sent: Thursday, August 09, 2001 4:22 PM
To: Kean, Steven J.
Subject: FW: FAO Jeffery K Skilling.doc
Steve, is this anything Enron would be interested in doing? I seriously doubt it, but these people are relentless in wanting to schedule a meeting with Jeff (even though the dates they wanted to do it passed two weeks ago). I received another call today. If it wasn't E&Y, I'd just say no, but wanted to run it by you before telling them "absolutely not and please don't call here anymore!" Thanks, SRS
-----Original Message-----
From: "gillian hurst" <[email protected]>@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22gillian+20hurst+22+20+3Cgillian+40consensus-research+2Ecom+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent: Thursday, July 26, 2001 9:30 AM
To: Skilling, Jeff
Cc: Sera, Sherri
Subject: FW: FAO Jeffery K Skilling.doc
-----Original Message-----
From: gillian hurst [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: 26 July 2001 12:34
To: '[email protected]'
Cc: '[email protected]'
Subject: FAO Jeffery K Skilling.doc
If you have any queries regarding this email please do not hesitate to
contact Ann Straker, Field Director on +44 (0) 20 7592 1714 or email:
[email protected].
Many thanks.
Mike Hannah
Managing Director
Tel: 020 7592 1714
- 9510 - posst.pdf
- Jeffery K Skilling.doc
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
This guy has called multiple people over and over again today with the below question. We have communicated to him that the non-competes are still valid at this time and he would be contacted when and if that changes. Any further word on this?
Thanks,
Sarah
-----Original Message-----
From: juan hernandez [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Monday, December 10, 2001 2:20 PM
To: Zarkowsky, Sarah
Subject:
Sarah, could you respond on the status of my 90 day
non-compete clause. With the unforeseen changes to
Enron's business and the subsequent firing of
employees under employment contracts, I would assume
that the 90 day non-compete is no longer valid. At a
minimum could you please call me at 281-829-1292 or
respond via e-mail.
Thanks,
Juan Hernandez
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Send your FREE holiday greetings online!
http://greetings.yahoo.com
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
It's been changed.
Evelyn Metoyer@ENRON
02/16/2001 02:12 PM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject:
deal 523883
Please ch term to 2/17 only.
Thanks!
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
FYI, see below.
---------------------- Forwarded by Ben Jacoby/HOU/ECT on 09/20/2000 06:43 PM
---------------------------
Matthew Tezyk@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
09/20/2000 06:13 PM
To: Ben F Jacoby@ECT
cc: Dan Shultz/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Mike
Coleman/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Dick
Westfahl/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
Subject: LM6000 Title Transfer Question
Ben,
Does ENA wish to accept Title of 14 LM6000's on September 26, 2000, or accept
Title of these Units after each has been issued an Inspection Acceptance
Certificate from EECC QA/QC department?
The following is a summary of the LM6000 Title Transfer Question:
Mike Storm, GE/SSEP Project Manager, requested from me, on 9/19/00, to accept
title of 14 LM6000's no later 9/26/00. I informed him I was not authorized
to make this decision and that I would contact the Owner to make the
decision. I further informed Mike Storm that our Owner would not accept
those terms and a compromise must be worked out.
Contract Reference 15.2.1 of contract 24-LM6K-2-99 states: title transfers
when equipment is ready to ship to the delivery point and seller notifies
purchaser of such event.
Delivery Point is defined as the SSEP storage yard.
SSEP has notified us that Units #1-14 are "Ready to Ship".
Contract Reference 10.2.3 of contract 24-LM6K-2-99 states: purchaser has the
right to inspect the equipment for "completeness prior to loading on
transport to delivery point".
We have inspected the first eleven Units and have informed SSEP that Units
#1-14 ARE NOT COMPLETE and therefore are NOT at the Delivery Point.
FACT: Units # 1-11 are at the delivery point. #12-14 are at SSEP.
FACT: If we sent a truck to SSEP tomorrow, NONE of the UNITS would be "Ready
to Ship" to a project site.
FACT: SSEP QA/QC has 15 Non Conformance Reports on these 14 turbines which
need to be corrected before they are "Ready to Ship".
It is in the best interests for both companies to correct the Non
Conformance's prior to shipment to the delivery point or project site.
RECOMMENDATION: I recommend that we DO NOT accept Title until the Units are
actually ready to be shipped to a project site. The problem is that NONE OF
THE UNITS ARE READY TO SHIP! SSEP has to work off punchlist items which
their QA/QC department has listed on Non Conformance Reports. At this
juncture, no money can be withheld from SSEP. To ensure they will be fixed,
Title should transfer after our QA/QC inspectors give written notice that
each Unit is complete and ready to ship. This will protect ENA on the
quality of the machines, as well as, ensure that little or no "re-work" is
performed in the field.
If you require further information or any assistance in this matter, please
feel free to contact me at 713-646-8258.
Matthew Tezyk
Project Manager
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
-----Original Message-----
From: Will, Lloyd
Sent: Monday, December 10, 2001 2:02 PM
To: Presto, Kevin M.
Subject: RE: Org. Chart
This is the first cut for your comments.
I still need to find out who is clean up co.
Thanks.
A copy is on your desk.
-----Original Message-----
From: Presto, Kevin M.
Sent: Monday, December 10, 2001 1:44 PM
To: Will, Lloyd
Subject: Org. Chart
Could you please create an org chart by function (retained employees) and org chart by function (severed employees) so we can reconcile to make sure we have not missed anyone.
Once we have done this, we can create a seating plan that is optimal. Please e-mail me the org. charts so I have an electronic version.
Thanks.
Kevin Presto
Vice President, East Power Trading
Phone: 713-853-5035
Cell: 713-854-3923
Fax: 713-646-8272
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
Mark and Mark,
I sent out a blacklined document with the additional changes on Friday and we received this today. Kim is following up to find out what they mean by significant problems with the integrity of the data. How do we respond to the warranty issues they raise?
Brent
-----Original Message-----
From: Theriot, Kim S.
Sent: Monday, October 22, 2001 9:15 AM
To: Hendry, Brent; Moore, Janet H.
Subject: Williams New Comments-EOL Amendment
Importance: High
Well....we thought we were close but look at Williams latest comments....How do we proceed from here??
Kim
-----Original Message-----
From: "Jones, Gayla" <[email protected]>@ENRON
Sent: Monday, October 22, 2001 8:28 AM
To: Theriot, Kim S.
Cc: Poole, Tracy; Crew, Jerry
Subject: Problem
We just thought we were going to get this signed. The Confirmations supervisor has some problems as outlined below. Can we fix this in the amendment? Do you want us to send language?
I would like to hold off executing this amendment until we can include a warranty provision (including remedies) regarding the accuracy of the "electronic records of the EOL transactions" . This is a result of:
? the current EOL service agreement disclaims all warranties as to the accuracy of the website information (Sec 4.b of the service agreement)
? the amendment in its current form does not warrant the accuracy of the electronic information, yet it will replace the confirmation, and
? we are currently experiencing significant problems with the integrity of the data obtained from the website, which I would have to assume would be the same data that would replace the confirmations.
Gayla Jones (Gayla.Jones@Williams. com)
Contract Administrator
Williams Energy Marketing & Trading Company
One Williams Center MD18-5
Tulsa OK 74172
918-573-5716
918-573-1935 (fax)
918-632-4923 (pager)
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
Bryan,
I have spoken with Steve Norris of Tembec about the above assignment. From
the beginning, Credit has been perfectly willing to go along with this
assignment as financial information and public debt ratings are available for
the proposed assignee. Credit remains amenable. However, we have been
waiting for documentation from Tembec effecting this assignment.
On speaking with Steve, he suggested that Enron provide the documentation.
After making some inquiries, it is my understanding that Enron does not
provide these legal services for its counterparties. I have left a voice
mail with Steve conveying this message.
Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions.
Paul Radous
X58356
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
When: Monday, September 17, 2001 10:00 AM-11:00 AM (GMT-06:00) Central Time (US & Canada).
Where: EB3530
*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
Hi Kate,
This deal needs to be researched. Can you help looking into its origin?
Thanks,
Carla
---------------------- Forwarded by Carla Hoffman/PDX/ECT on 12/06/2000 11:38
AM ---------------------------
Niclas Egmar@EES
12/04/2000 09:39 AM
To: Carla Hoffman/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: 11_11 correction VIP
---------------------- Forwarded by Niclas Egmar/HOU/EES on 12/04/2000 11:39
AM ---------------------------
Niclas Egmar
12/01/2000 03:30 PM
To: Phillip Platter/HOU/ECT@ECT, Chris Mallory/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc: Daniel Kang/HOU/EES@EES, Jennifer Johnson/HOU/EES@EES, Wayne
Kimball/HOU/EES@EES, Jubran Whalan/HOU/EES@EES, Neil Bresnan/HOU/EES@EES
Subject: 11_11 correction
I talked to Phil about a trade on 11/11/00 regarding 640 MW deal number
456233.1 could you please send me and Jennifer Johnson some more detail
about this deal.
Is this an hour a head deal?
What hours are involved?
Thanks alot
Niclas
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
After our very useful meeting with you yesterday, Sophie, and your HR
colleague (Georgina? - I didn't get her surname), I have received from
Viviana this follow up e-mail to a short conversation I had with her last
week. You will recall that Paul stated his expectations at our meeting about
the outcome of Viviana's next performance review. She has effectively started
explaining her grievances to me. Your advice would be welcome.
---------------------- Forwarded by Peter Styles/LON/ECT on 15/05/2001 10:30
---------------------------
From: Viviana Florio/Enron@EUEnronXgate on 15/05/2001 07:58 GDT
To: Peter Styles/LON/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Follow up last week meeting
Hello Peter,
hope you're fine.
I'm wondering whether it would be possible for you to call me today, because
I would like to continue with you the discussion we started last week when I
was in London.
I have to admit that I'm quite worried and I do not know what to expect.
Thank you very much in advance.
Viviana
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
OK
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
Christian asked me to work with Dan Watkiss to prepare a FERC filing to
terminate EPMI's participation in the PX. I have asked Dan to get started as
Christian said we may decide to file as soon as today. See attached
explanation. Does EES also have a participation agreement? And if so do we
also need to file a termination for EES?
---------------------- Forwarded by Mary Hain/HOU/ECT on 02/01/2001 09:04 AM
---------------------------
Christian Yoder
02/01/2001 08:12 AM
To: Mary Hain/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Letters to terminate EPMI's CalPX Participation Agreement
---------------------- Forwarded by Christian Yoder/HOU/ECT on 02/01/2001
07:53 AM ---------------------------
Christian Yoder
02/01/2001 07:47 AM
To: [email protected]
cc: Elizabeth Sager/HOU/ECT@ECT, Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT@ECT,
[email protected], [email protected], Steve C Hall/PDX/ECT@ECT
Subject: Letters to terminate EPMI's CalPX Participation Agreement
Dan,
At some point in the incremental meltdown of the PX process, perhaps when we
default on payment of the large chargeback bill we will receive today or
tomorrow and the PX takes our remaining collateral, the question will
suddenly be: how does one make sure one is not the last man standing? It
would seem that if it is possible to ever become a "former" participant in
the PX and not a "current" one, ("current" being the word used in the tariff
to describe who the chargebacks go to) that we would have had, at a minimum,
to have given notice of termination of our participation in both the Core and
CTS markets. Please review this documentation and help us prepare for a
possible extradited extraction from the PX. Thanks.----cgy
---------------------- Forwarded by Christian Yoder/HOU/ECT on 02/01/2001
07:19 AM ---------------------------
Steve C Hall
01/31/2001 05:57 PM
To: Elizabeth Sager/HOU/ECT@ECT, Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT@ECT,
[email protected], Christian Yoder/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Letters to terminate EPMI's CalPX Participation Agreement
I have attached ready-to-file drafts of the letters necessary to terminate
EPMI's Participation Agreement with the CalPX. In addition to the letter to
the CalPX, I am reasonably certain that a FERC filing is required to
terminate the Participation Agreement because it is a power purchase/sale
agreement, the form of which is on file with FERC. Just to be safe I
prepared the transmittal letter, notice of termination, and notice of filing
necessary to file with FERC. Among other things, I requested waiver of the
60-day notice period.
I'll wait for further instruction before doing anything else on this matter.
Steve
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
Gerald: There is your agreement of 12/7/98 that expires 12/7/2000 re ECT
supplying NGPL info in order to develop natural gas interconnect off of NGPL
with power plants in Chicago area - But other than that no agreements with or
pertaining to Natural Gas Pipeline or the proposed transaction.
Kay
Gerald Nemec
04/25/2000 04:03 PM
To: Kay Young/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: CA Data Sheet
Kay, Please review the attached. Thanks for your help.
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
November 22, 2000
Teco Tap 30.000 / Enron ; 76.250 / HPL Gas Daily
November 23, 2000
Teco Tap 0
November 24, 2000
Teco Tap 30.000 / Enron ; 63.750 / HPL Gas Daily
November 25, 2000
Teco Tap 30.000 / Enron ; 76.250 / HPL Gas Daily
November 26, 2000
Teco Tap 30.000 / Enron ; 95.000 / HPL Gas Daily
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
I left Bruce a message offering my assistance.
From: Ed B Hearn III@ECT on 07/11/2000 01:49 PM
To: Bruce Sukaly/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
Subject: Re: "Turbine CA"
Bruce:
I'm unfamiliar with the documents you've requested (turbine/site
guarantee). I think you'll have a much faster turn around time if you
contact Kay Mann. Kay is our resident turbine expert, so you should benefit
greatly from her assistance.
Thanks,
Ed
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
Don,
Hey, how's it going? Gone fishing lately? I talked to Kayne earlier today
about a posting this guy is interested. Kayne tells me you are the man with
the opening. I just wanted to forward this to you so you could take a look
at. Jay schedules gas for EES and is interested in your position. I
explained to him generally what the position is about, but things have
changed. He says he talked to Larry Campbell also. In fact, Larry might have
talked to you about him already. I haven't worked with him before, so I
can't specifically vouch for his work ability (Larry can fill you in better
in that area), but he does have good communications skills and is easy to get
along with...(team player). Also, he is an internal employee. Attached
below is his resume.
John
---------------------- Forwarded by John Zurita/HOU/EES on 04/30/2001 03:29
PM ---------------------------
Jay Blaine
04/24/2001 03:23 PM
To: John Zurita/HOU/EES@EES
cc:
Subject: Job Posting 0000108727 Trader
John, I am interested in the ENA East Power Service DE Trader position
currently being posted under Kayne Coulter. I was hoping you could speak
with him about my interest and forward my resume. Let me know what you
think. Thanks, Jay
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
I am leaving early to get William to the Dr. Mary
Enron North America Corp.
Mary Cook
1400 Smith, 38th Floor, Legal
Houston, Texas 77002-7361
(713) 345-7732 (phone)
(713) 646-3490 (fax)
[email protected]
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
---------------------- Forwarded by Kate Symes/PDX/ECT on 04/11/2001 09:56 AM
---------------------------
Anna Symes <[email protected]> on 04/11/2001 09:54:14 AM
To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
cc:
Subject: I thought you might be interested...
To: [email protected]
From: Anna Symes
I thought you might be interested in this job. It's just one of the
more than 250,000 great jobs on Headhunter.net:
http://www.headhunter.net/share/det.asp?d=J26K66D0YJBB4DWPWJ
Comments:
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
Jim: Are these basis offers or efp offers?
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
Here is another competitor for online clearing we will be watching.
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
Daily-Blessing
http://www.daily-blessings.com/bless145.htm
Lord's prayer
http://www.daily-blessings.com/humor53.htm
check out thanksgiving pages...send them on to friends and family to let them
know you are thankful for them!
http://www.debsfunpages.com/thanksgiving.htm
win a digital camera, $4500.00 or MORE
http://www.daily-blessings.com/4500.htm
FORGET PC PHONE. GET REAL LONG DISTANCE AT NO COST bigredwire is the first
and only company to offer REAL long distance at no cost
Switch your long distance to bigredwire and get REAL long distance at zero
cost to you. Up to 100 complimentary minutes everyday when you zap your
online bill. If you don't zap, pay only 5 cents a minute without fees. Switch
now!
find out how at http://www.daily-blessings.com/cjbigredwire.htm
Mr Inkman-for all your ink needs
http://www.daily-blessings.com/inkman.htm
<<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>>
* To remove yourself from this mailing list, point your browser to:
http://inbound.postmastergeneral.com/remove?dailyblessings:10
* Enter your email address ([email protected]) in the field
provided and click "Unsubscribe". The mailing list ID is "dailyblessings:10".
OR...
* Reply to this message with the word "remove" in the subject line.
This message was sent to address [email protected]
X-PMG-Recipient: [email protected]
<<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>>
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
soon b/c I'm losing info
Sara Shackleton
Enron Wholesale Services
1400 Smith Street, EB3801a
Houston, TX 77002
Ph: (713) 853-5620
Fax: (713) 646-3490
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
Margo, Elizabeth Sager has approved a total of 64 hours of vacation to carry-over to 2002 for Genia FitzGerald. The breakdown is as follows.
40 hours - Supervisor approval not needed
24 hours - Approved by Elizabeth Sager (11/15/01)
Please make sure Genia's file reflects this change. Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me. Thanks.
Alice Wright
Assistant to Elizabeth Sager
1400 Smith St., EB3809A
Houston, Texas 77002
Tel: 713-853-5438
Fax: 713-646-3491
[email protected]
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
As we discussed in DC
---------------------- Forwarded by Steve Montovano/DUB/EES on 07/13/2000
05:11 PM ---------------------------
Daniel Allegretti
07/10/2000 03:57 PM
To: Steve Montovano/DUB/EES@EES
cc:
Subject: Draft Mid-Market Business Plan for NEPOOL
---------------------- Forwarded by Daniel Allegretti/HOU/EES on 07/10/2000
04:57 PM ---------------------------
John Llodra@ENRON
07/10/2000 02:28 PM
To: Mark Dana Davis/HOU/ECT@ECT, John D Suarez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kevin M
Presto/HOU/ECT@ECT, Alonzo Williams/HOU/ECT@ECT, Gerald Gilbert/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Tom Dutta/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey Miller/NA/Enron@Enron, George
Hopley/HOU/ECT@ect, Daniel Allegretti/HOU/EES@EES, Janelle Scheuer/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Edward D Baughman/HOU/ECT@ECT, George Wood/Corp/Enron@Enron
Subject: Draft Mid-Market Business Plan for NEPOOL
All:
Please find attached a draft mid-market business plan for NEPOOL prepared by
Woody and I. Our hope was to get your feedback/input/suggestions on this by
no later than 3 PM CST tomorrow, Tuesday 7/11 as we need to submit this to
Ed on Wednesday. If there are any questions or you would like to discuss,
please don't hesitate to call us. Thanks for your help...
John
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
As mentioned in our report last week, AB1X is expected to pass the Senate
later this week. Lawmakers were busy over the weekend and yesterday marking
up the bill. One change includes the Department of Water Resources will use
a "weighted average" price of 5.5 cents per kilowatt hour instead of the 5.5
cents per kilowatt hour price cap.
Another bill is currently being drafted by Assemblyman Keeley and Sen. Battin
allowing QFs to sell electricity at 8 cents per kilowatt hour (down from 18
cents) to Socal. The bill stemmed from a series of negotiations that have
been taking place with CA government officials. However, a source close to
the negotiations confirms that PG&E was not involved in the meetings.
Per Friday's update, negotiations continue on a bond issuance plan but sides
remain divided on amount and if it would include the internal debt of the
parent companies or just debt due to external creditors.
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
Looks ok overall but here are a couple of suggestions:
Make price/mgw an optional field in the deal entry section of eterra.
2B should be a higher priority. Also, an alternative to 2B is to have a drop-down box within eTerra to display the corresponding name of the counterparty.
[Phillips, George]
-----Original Message-----
From: Capasso, Joe
Sent: Tuesday, November 20, 2001 3:10 AM
To: Forney, John M.
Subject: FW: Eterra
Madup,
In reference to Eterra, I have prioritized some enhancements to the system that will improve its usage and accuracy. When using Eterra, some tasks are difficult to complete and can result in mismatches in the Ercot Portal. I will identify some of the difficult tasks and I will make some suggestions on enhancements.
In addition, I realize that we are working with time constraints and limited personnel.
I will categorize the list based on Priority 1, 2 & 3.
Priority 1 - Very important and needs to be completed immediately
Priority 2 - Important and needs to be completed within the next 30 days
Priority 3 - Moderate importance, easy tasks can be completed at programmers convenience.
Priority 1A:
Allow the Deal Entry screen to accept single entry trades, such as a simultaneous Buy from Counterparty A in the South Zone and a Sell to Counterparty B in the North Zone. Currently, this has to be done by entering two trades, a purchase from Counterparty A (South Zone) to the Hourly Ercot Book and a second trade, a sell from the Hourly Ercot Book to Counterparty B. I realize that we have a problem with the transmission between the North and South Zones and that is what makes this a difficult enhancement.
Priority1B:
Change the process of increasing the Frontera generation. The current process is to input a buy from Frontera and a sell to Frontera. This is not very intuitive and causes some confusion. Why can't we input a buy from Frontera just as we would with any other trade? It could be as simple as clicking a box to indicate that Frontera (i.e. - EPMI) should be adjusted on the resource side and not EPMI on the obligation side.
Priority1C:
Eterra should not write over any trades that were input manually into the Ercot Portal.
Is there any way that we can make it identify a trade that was input manually into the portal?
When it finds one then it should not overwrite this trade.
Priority2A:
Undo Button - On various occasions, we have sent Bal Day trades to the QSE MOS/Ercot Portal and
it was not the result that we had expected. Therefore, the trader has to manually change each of the trades. This can be a very time consuming process.
Is there a way to have an UNDO button (similar to the Excel UNDO key) to retract the trade information from the QSE MOS or Portal?
Priority2B:
Change the short name in <internal counterparty> & <external counterparty> to the actual long name, (i.e. - elpasomeren to El Paso Merchant Energy)
Reason: It is just difficult to read. I brought this up with Sasha and he said it would be a quick fix, but it is still not done.
Proirity3A:
Please give us a list of the Counterparties and their appropriate QSE names, (i.e. - El Paso Merchant is actually APX)
This helps us identify what it will effect in the QSE MOS and Portal (for example, elpasomeren is converted into APX).
But does ELP or ELPASELECOM convert to APX also?
Priority3B:
Match Flow Period to automatically update the Contract Date. This is one less step that we need to worry about.
The above mentioned enhancements will allow us to quickly and accurately update the QSE MOS & Ercot Portal.
In addition, it will allow us to quickly correct the portal if a mistake occurs.
If you need additional clarification on any of these topics, I would be happy to meet with you to discuss this further.
I will be working days on Monday, Nov. 26th - Thursday, Nov 29th.
Thanks,
Joe Capasso
PS - Below is an email that outlines my conversation with Sasha on November 3rd. Unfortunately, none of the "quick fixes" have been completed yet.
-----Original Message-----
From: Capasso, Joe
Sent: Saturday, November 03, 2001 4:55 PM
To: Forney, John M.
Cc: '[email protected],'; McElreath, Alexander; Olinde Jr., Steve; Phillips, George; Oh, Seung-Taek
Subject: Eterra
John,
I met with Sasha today for approx. 3 hours.
We reviewed the exact process for inputting data into Eterra and verifying the trades prior to being sent to the QSE MOS.
Here are some suggestions that I made to Sasha for improving Eterra (the top of the list is the highest priority):
- Allow the Deal Entry screen to accept single entry trades, such as a simultaneous Buy from Calpine (South Zone) and a Sell to FPL (North Zone).
Currently, this has to be done by entering two trades, a purchase from Calpine (South Zone) to the Hourly Ercot book and a second entry of Hourly Ercot book
to FPL (North Zone). Sasha said he is working on this, but problems are occurring due to the transmission between South and North.
- Change the process of increasing the Frontera generation. The current process is to input a buy from Frontera into the Frontera book.
This is not very intuitive and we are still trying to work out an easier process. (Possibly even having a button that we can click to indicate that
it is a purchase from Frontera. Essentially, this would increase the EPMI mw's in the Ercot Portal.)
- Change the short name in <internal counterpary> & <external counterparty> to the actual long name, (i.e. - elpasomeren to El Paso Merchant Energy)
- Give us a list of Counterparties and the appropriate QSE, (i.e. - El Paso Merchant is actually APX)
So that we know what it will affect in the Ercot Portal.
- Match flow date to automatically update the Contract date. One less step that we need to worry about.
I tried to impress upon Sasha that in trading "time is of the essence" and that we don't have much time to input data.
Therefore, we need to streamline the deal entry process and to make it more user friendly.
I realize that the first two items will take some time, but the last 3 items should be quick fixes.
I hope this helps.
Joe Capasso
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
Way c ool.
From: Reagan Rorschach/ENRON@enronXgate on 04/13/2001 11:36 AM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc: "David Fairley (E-mail 2)"
<[email protected]>@SMTP@enronXgate, "David Fairley (E-mail 3)"
<[email protected]>@SMTP@enronXgate
Subject: MDEA Comments
Kay -
I just spoke with Marvin, he seems pretty happy--just a few comments so far:
? the arbitration/dispute resolution clause needs to reflect what is in the
LOI
? weekends are not included in the definition of off-peak hours
Marvin, David and Robert are still reviewing and look to have additional
comments by early next week.
Reagan
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
Mike and I have already seen his resume. I know him from the gas market, and
am going to take a pass on David.
Thanks. Jeff
Shanna Funkhouser@ENRON
01/01/2001 09:24 PM
To: Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: David Pruner Resume
Jeff,
Attached below is a resume for David Pruner who is currently a Sr. VP with
Azurix. I wanted to run his resume past you before sending to any of the EGM
execs. David's resume was forwarded by Frevert.
Shanna
---------------------- Forwarded by Shanna Funkhouser/Corp/Enron on
01/01/2001 09:15 PM ---------------------------
David Oxley@ECT
12/28/2000 06:43 PM
To: Ted C Bland/HOU/ECT@ECT, Neil Davies/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Cindy
Skinner/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kim Melodick/HOU/ECT@ECT, Fran L Mayes/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Shanna Funkhouser/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Robert Jones/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Jeanie
Slone/HOU/ECT@ECT, Gary Buck/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: My Resume
Ted, please take lead in making sure we follow through on this and get back
to David with interest and updates.
---------------------- Forwarded by David Oxley/HOU/ECT on 12/28/2000 06:33
PM ---------------------------
Mark Frevert@ENRON
12/27/2000 08:53 AM
To: David Oxley/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: My Resume
Could you please circulate across the wholesale team . Thanks . Mark
---------------------- Forwarded by Mark Frevert/NA/Enron on 12/27/2000 07:33
AM ---------------------------
From: John L Garrison@AZURIX on 12/26/2000 06:47 PM
To: Mark Frevert/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: My Resume
Mark,
Attached is a resume for David Pruner. David is very interested in finding
an executive position in your organization. I will give you a call after
the holidays. Is there any one else I should contact?
Have a great Holiday Season.
John L. Garrison
President and Chief Executive Officer
Azurix Corp.
713-646-6421 Office
713-646-9577 Fax
[email protected]
----- Forwarded by John L Garrison/HOU/AZURIX on 12/26/00 06:43 PM -----
David Pruner
12/20/00 03:53 PM
To: John L Garrison/HOU/AZURIX@AZURIX
cc:
Subject: My Resume
John I would like to take you up on your offer to call Mark Frevert on my
behalf so I have attached my resume. Within his Enron Wholesale group I am
looking at talking to John Sherriff's Enron Europe and Mike McConnell's
Global Markets.Thanks for doing this and if you need any additional
information let me know.
Dave Pruner 713-646-8329
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
you getting out early? you going out tonight?
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
Ted,
I'm happy to sign off on the basis discussed with Bryan at the end of last
week and outlined in the attached memo.
Regards
Fernley
From: Ted Murphy 08/02/2000 22:16
To: Steve W Young/LON/ECT@ECT, Fernley Dyson/LON/ECT@ECT, Michael R
Brown/LON/ECT@ECT, William S Bradford/HOU/ECT@ECT, John Sherriff/LON/ECT@ECT,
Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Rick Buy
Subject: Credit Trading brought to you by Bryan Seyfried
My understanding is that Bryan will be in Houston to present his strategy
regarding credit trading for approval under an interim trading policy -
signed off by Jeff and Rick. Before making any recommendation to Jeff, Rick
wants to be sure that the people on the list above are comfortable with the
activity and will be willing to signoff on the approval. Given that Bryan
will be physically here, I am requesting that you E-mail your concurrence to
me no later than tommorrow. Otherwise RAC will not present to Jeff for
approval.
Thank you for your help in puttting this together and making it a success!
Ted
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
Kyle Anthony Barroso
January 16,2002
6lbs. 15oz.
18.5 inches long
- MVC-001S.JPG
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
Attached is list for Bush's transition advisory teams- notably, we're absent
from all but Commerce(Sandherr) and Energy(Lay).
From: Lara Leibman on 01/02/2001 10:57 AM
To: Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: [aaiadvisoryboard] aai- Transition Teams
In case you'd like the electronic version, here it is . . .
----- Forwarded by Lara Leibman/NA/Enron on 01/02/2001 10:57 AM -----
[email protected]
01/02/2001 10:32 AM
To: [email protected]
cc:
Subject: [aaiadvisoryboard] aai- Transition Teams
I am attaching in pdf the membership of the Bush transition teams. With
respect to the Justice Dept, the only friendly faces seem to be Jamie
Gorelick and James Rill. There is no listing for FTC. Let me know if I am
missing anyone who might be friendly. BERT
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[email protected]
- aai- Bush Ad- Transition teams.pdf
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
ohhhhh goody, I can leave then???
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
---------------------- Forwarded by Judy Hernandez/HOU/ECT on 05/11/2000
12:05 PM ---------------------------
"SOCORRO HERNANDEZ" <[email protected]> on 05/11/2000 10:31:50 AM
To: <[email protected]>, <[email protected]>, "A. SUE
GONZALES-GUEVARA" <[email protected]>, "CATHERINE BROWN" <[email protected]>,
"KATHY MARIE MOORE" <[email protected]>, "MARIA SOLIZ" <[email protected]>,
"MARIA THOMPSON" <[email protected]>, "VIVIAN FARRELL" <[email protected]>
cc:
Subject: Fwd: FW: click on the roses!!
Good morning my friends. I probably sent this to some of you before, but I
ran into it again, and made me feel so good, that I felt like sharing it with
all of you again. Hope you can open it and enjoy it, as much as I did.
Love you all.
Coco
- friendship_1.pps
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
Stinson,
I will present "Market Risk Management in Petroleum Industry" for
2000 International Chinese Petroleum & Petrochemical Technology
Conference, Houston, Dec. 1-4, 2000.
There will be 200 plus delegates from US, China and Taiwan to participate
the conference. It is a free advertizing opportunity for Enron.
If you have time, could you take a look at the presentation to see if any
errors.
Thanks,
Zimin
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
We were allocated a total of 7591 mmbtu at the receipt point for November. I
think our contract for November is at the average of the Inside FERC
postings for the three pipes plus a penny. Those prices are as follows:
Transco Zone 3 $4.51
Florida Zone 3 $4.45
Sonat $4.47
Avg $4.4767 + 0.01 = $4.4867
The same transport fee and fuel percentage as last month should be deducted
from this price. I think the allocated fuel was 23 mmbtu.
Also, keep in mind that we scheduled 31,112 mmbtu per Rebel's directions.
ENA will have to cash out the difference with Destin (at higher prices!).
Thanks,
Susan Pereira
[email protected] on 12/07/2000 02:05:57 PM
To: [email protected]
cc: [email protected]
Subject: Prices and volumes
Susan,
Do you have any idea when we will receive volumes and pricing for the Bazor
Ridge Gas Plant for November? If I need to contact someone else concerning
these issues please let me know.
Thanks,
Stevens
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
According to our system records, you have not yet logged into the Enron
Performance Management system (PEP). As a result your temporary password
for the PEP system has expired. Your User Id and new password are provided
below.
During the feedback phase you will need to access PEP at
http://pep.corp.enron.com to suggest reviewers who can provide feedback on
your performance. You may also be requested to provide feedback on fellow
employees, but the system will only be open for feedback until November 17th!
HelpDesk representatives will be available to answer questions throughout the
process. You may contact the HelpDesk at:
Houston: 1-713-853-4777, Option 4
London: 44-207-783-4040, Option 4
E-mail: [email protected]
Your User Id and new PEP password are:
User ID: 90011947
Password: WSRXTIVM
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
These are available at the receptionist desk on the 16th floor of Enron Building North.
Ginger
-----Original Message-----
From: Benson, Robert
Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2002 12:53 PM
To: Sinclair, Ginger
Subject: Rob Benson Pay Stub
Hi Ginger, I need a copy of my last 2 pay stubs in order to get my work visa stuff started. If you could please send me a copy. Thank you very much.
Robert Benson
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
Meters are below.
[email protected] on 01/31/2000 04:44:18 PM
Please respond to [email protected]
To: Brian Perrone/CES/ColumbiaGas@COLUMBIAGAS
cc: [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected],
[email protected]
Subject: Fixed price deal
I believe you did a fixed priced deal with Craig Taylor. The price is $3.06.
Could you get me the meter numbers? This is what I have so far
COH Mrkt Area Monthly Vol Meter
7 5 700 23-25
7 1 1141 23-1
7 1 682 23-1
7 5 1993 23-25
7 5 2881 23-25
7 5 5534 23-25
7 5 12309 23-25
5 2 1577 23N-2
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
Despite the personal pleasure that I would derive from seeing Glynn and Richard strike out big time, it's not worth the price to ratepayers of letting these pirates (yes, pirates!) rip off so many valuable assets that should stay under PUC regulation for the benefit of consumers.
---------- Original Message ----------------------------------
From: "Dasovich, Jeff" <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2001 00:18:55 -0500
>So I'm assuming that you support the plan?
>
>Best,
>Jeff
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mike Florio
> Sent: Mon 9/24/2001 11:13 PM
> To: Dasovich, Jeff
> Cc:
> Subject: Re: Dissent from Commissioners Bilas and Duque Opposing
>Suspension of DA
>
>
>
> I have a new description of PG&E's reorg plan-- it is the
>ultimate
> expression of their longstanding affliction with Enron-envy.
>Now that
> they're cutting loose the UDC/LDC, they can fall flat on their
>faces with
> no safety net (except the hydro, of course). MIKE
>
>
> At 04:43 PM 9/24/2001 -0500, you wrote:
>
>
> > > Commissioners Henry M. Duque and Richard A. Bilas,
>dissenting:
> > >
> > > One could say that this order is consistent with the
>Administration's
> > > present third world country mentality. We are punishing the
>very
> > > consumers and providers who made a commitment to ensuring
>electric
> > > restructuring did work by adding a demand retail component
>to cure the
> > > dysfunctions in the wholesale market.
> > >
> > > We are not convinced that the Department of Water Resources
>(DWR) bond
> > > ratings depend on killing direct access. This notion is a
>scare
> > > tactic and a smoke screen. Direct access comprises such a
>small
> > > percentage of overall demand that it cannot reasonably be
>seen to be a
> > > threat to the sale of the bonds. Direct Access should be
>seen as a
> > > benefit to DWR. It would decrease the amount of the
>utilities net
> > > short obligations and relieve DWR from its power purchasing
> > > responsibilities sooner.
> > >
> > > Something else is going on here. We think that the DWR does
>not want
> > > direct access because if the public is presented with
>alternatives, it
> > > will make DWR's purchasing mistakes abundantly clear. The
>Commission
> > > should be holding hearings to test the assertions being made
>by DWR,
> > > Finance and the Treasurer. Instead, the Commission is
>making an ill
> > > informed, panicked decision to act now and study the
>repercussions
> > > later.
> > >
> > > DWR and the bonds should not be threatened by direct
>access if
> > > DWR is making prudent energy purchases. Only if DWR's
>contracts are
> > > too expensive, relative to market, will customers seek
>shelter in
> > > lower direct access prices. Indeed, retaining direct access
>as a way
> > > to send price signals to consumers may be the only way to
>place
> > > pressure on DWR to make more prudent purchases. This is a
>very
> > > important consideration since AB 1X prevents us from
>engaging in any
> > > prudency review of the DWR costs to be passed through to
>ratepayers in
> > > order to repay the bonds. If there is no yardstick, how can
>anyone
> > > measure DWR performance? The answer is, one can't, unless SB
>18xx is
> > > signed into law.
> > >
> > > We think that additional review of these issues,
>before
> > > suspending direct access, would have produced a more sound
>decision in
> > > the long run.
> > >
> > > For these reasons we must respectfully dissent.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > /s/ HENRY M. DUQUE /s/ RICHARD
>A. BILAS
> > > Henry M. Duque
> > > Richard A. Bilas
> > > Commissioner
>Commissioner
> > >
> > > September 20, 2001
> > >
> >
> >
>
>>**********************************************************************
> >This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant
>affiliate
> >and may contain confidential and privileged material for the
>sole use of
> >the intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or
>disclosure by
> >others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended
>recipient (or
> >authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the
>sender or
> >reply to Enron Corp. at
>[email protected] and
> >delete all copies of the message. This e-mail (and any
>attachments hereto)
> >are not intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not
>create or
> >evidence a binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp.
>(or any of
> >its affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party,
>and may not
> >be relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel
>or
> >otherwise. Thank you.
>
>>**********************************************************************
>
>
>
>
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
Tom Swank, the originator and I sat down with Bruce Golden and went through
the porject cost numbers for the GE 7FA combined cycle facility. At this
point we need to claculate FOM and VOM and other operating expenses. We feel
pretty good about the project cost numbers. Let me know if you need more
info than I have already given you. Bruce Golden has the soft copy of the
project cost numbers. Thanks
Ben
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
With Ken Lay's resignation, you undoubtedly have questions about Enron's management structure and what lies ahead for the company. The purpose of this communication is to begin to answer those questions and lay out the direction we plan to follow as we regroup and rebuild.
First, the Creditors Committee has proposed that the Board of Directors retain an interim CEO to focus on the restructuring process. This is a positive sign that the Committee believes Enron will provide greater value as a viable ongoing business.
The Enron Board of Directors has approved Stephen Cooper as interim CEO and chief restructuring officer. Steve is the managing partner of Zolfo Cooper, a corporate recovery and crisis management firm with more than 30 years experience leading companies through operational and financial reorganizations.
Steve and his firm will work with members of Enron's current management to develop and implement a comprehensive plan to restructure the company and emerge from bankruptcy.
As you know, Enron has entered into an agreement with UBS Warburg for the sale of NetCo, Enron's wholesale gas and power trading organization. In preparation for the transition of NetCo to UBS, Greg Whalley has resigned as president and COO of Enron to assume a position with UBS Warburg. We want to thank Greg and the NetCo employees joining UBS for their contributions to Enron and wish them great success going forward.
In addition to engaging Steve, Enron has formed an Office of the Chief Executive. I will join Steve in that office as president and chief operating officer, and Ray Bowen will join us as executive vice president and chief financial officer.
We will provide additional information regarding the roles and responsibilities of Enron's entire management team once those become more fully defined.
Thank you for continuing to support Enron by performing your job everyday. The ongoing uncertainty about our future, coupled with the constant media scrutiny, makes this situation difficult for all of us. While no one can control the media, we can and will define our leadership and devise our strategy for moving ahead. And in doing so, we will build a more certain future for our company and our employees.
Link to the press release: http://www.enron.com/corp/pressroom/releases/2002/ene/012902Release.html
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
Delaney )
IEP has one minor edit to the draft letter and three edits to the
recommendations. Three of our four suggestions are driven by legislation
sent to the Governor in the last days of session. A redlined version is
attached. I hope this is helpful.
(1) We propose to eliminate one proposed solution that is part of AB 970.
Our edits move to the description of AB 970 the recommendation for allowing
plants expected to come on line in 2 or 3 years to come on line earlier as
single cycle facilities from the list of solutions.
(2) We propose to move the proposal to expedite renewable generation to a
comment that signing AB 995/SB 1194 will expedite more than 500 MW of new
renewable generation by next summer. (This number is based on a CEC
letter.)
(3) We propose to consolidate solutions 4 and 5 since both involve changes
or additions to existing plants.
(4) Finally, we propose to modify the description of the CEC,s expedited
siting process to reflect AB 970 more accurately.
If you have any questions, please call.
Karen Edson
[email protected]
-----Original Message-----
From: Delaney Hunter [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 12, 2000 5:03 PM
To: Aaron Thomas (E-mail); 'Allan Lippincott'; Ann Cohn (E-mail); 'Ann
Watson'; Anna Ferrera (E-mail); 'Art Carter'; 'assistant for John
Fielder'; Barbara Barkovich (E-mail); 'Becky Kilbourne'; Bill Booth
(E-mail); 'Bill Dombrowski'; Bill Keese (E-mail); Bill Zobel (E-mail);
'Bob Foster'; 'Bob Houston'; Carolyn McIntyre (E-mail); Carolyn
Veal-Hunter (E-mail); Catherine Hackney (E-mail); Charles Bacchi
(E-mail); 'Craig Brown'; Dan Carroll (E-mail); 'Denice Cazalet'; Dennis
Price (E-mail); 'Denny Samuel'; 'Dominic DiMare'; Dorothy Rothrock
(E-mail); 'Ed Yates'; Eloy Garcia (E-mail); Evelyn Elsesser (E-mail);
Gary Heath (E-mail); 'Gordon McDonald'; 'Jack Flanigan'; Jack Gualco
(E-mail); 'Jack Stewart'; 'James Boyd'; Jan Smutny-Jones (E-mail); Jeff
Dasovich (E-mail); 'Jerry Jordan'; Jim Cassie (E-mail); Jim Groniger
(E-mail); Joe Lyons (E-mail); 'Joe Ronan'; John Bridges (E-mail); 'John
Fielder'; John Fistolera (E-mail); John Larrea (E-mail); John Rozsa
(E-mail); John White (E-mail); 'Joseph Alamo'; 'Julia Wright'; Karen
Edson (E-mail); Karen Jarrell (E-mail); Karen Koyano (E-mail); 'Karen
Lindh'; Karen Mills (E-mail); 'Kari Harteloo'; 'Kathy Brandenburg'; Kay
Grosulak (E-mail); Keith McCrea (E-mail); Kevin Lynch (E-mail); Kevin
Smith (E-mail); Lawrence Lingbloom (E-mail); Lenny Goldberg (E-mail);
Louis Szablya (E-mail); Marc Joseph (E-mail); Marwan Masri (E-mail);
Mary McDonald (E-mail); Michael Alcantar (E-mail); Mike Florio (E-mail);
'Mike Kahl'; Mona Petrochko (E-mail); Pete Conaty (E-mail); 'Phil
Nails'; Phil Stohr (E-mail); Ralph Cavanagh (E-mail); Randy Chinn
(E-mail); Ray Thompson (E-mail); 'Rick Counihan'; Robert Berry (E-mail);
Robin Larson (E-mail); Sheryl Carter (E-mail); Steve Pike (E-mail); Stu
Wilson (E-mail); 'Sue Mara'; Susan Reeder (E-mail); Terry Winter
(E-mail); Thomas Dinkel (E-mail); Tim Schmelzer (E-mail); 'Tommy Ross';
'Tony Braun'; Victoria Schaefer (E-mail)
Subject: IMPORTANT -- Letter to Governor Davis
Folks-
At today's meeting, those Group members who attended agreed that we should
indeed send the letter with changes reflecting the new legislation. Attached
is the newest draft of such a letter. We need to send this letter out FRIDAY
so in order to do that please look over the letter carefully and let me know
if your organization wishes to be included as a signatory. I need every set
of eyes out there to look this letter over for spelling, grammar and
content -- my eyes have seen it too many times and are apt to miss things.
So, here is the process ---
Let me know of any minor changes ASAP. If there are content changes please
email them to the ENTIRE group for sign off. Please understand that we want
to send this FRIDAY so we do not have a lot of time to make changes. When I
have a final draft I will ask people to fax signatures or send originals to
me by Friday.Thank you all for your help with this letter. We could not have
done it with out you.
We will be scheduling our next general meeting for mid October. Also, we
have finalized the dates for the Annual Retreat and will be sending out
packets with all the details next week. DJ and I are working on the agenda
so if you have a specific topic you would like covered please let us know.
As always, please send me an email or give me a call if you have any
concerns or questions about the letter or any other matter.
Thanks,
Delaney
- A. AB 1890 Letter - IEP Draft Redlined.doc
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
Start Date: 1/6/02; HourAhead hour: 4; No ancillary schedules awarded. Variances detected.
Variances detected in Load schedule.
LOG MESSAGES:
PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final Schedules\2002010604.txt
---- Load Schedule ----
$$$ Variance found in table tblLoads.
Details: (Hour: 4 / Preferred: 12.63 / Final: 12.60)
TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
LOAD_ID: PGE4
MKT_TYPE: 2
TRANS_DATE: 1/6/02
SC_ID: ENRJ
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
I was going to send you a photo of your woman from the baby shower but I
can't load it from work. I'll send it to you next week.
---------------------- Forwarded by Chris Germany/HOU/ECT on 09/08/2000 07:55
AM ---------------------------
[email protected] on 09/07/2000 09:10:37 PM
To: [email protected]
cc:
Subject: Photo
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
Veronica:
You don't need to copy me on these so long as you copy all of the legal
assistants. Theyw ill make sure that either Sara or I review what they draft.
Carol
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
-----Original Message-----
From: Forney, John M.
Sent: Thursday, September 27, 2001 10:58 AM
To: Oh, Chung Taek
Subject: EES FILE
O -
the file should be m:electric/eservices/ees/ercot/ees model
go get em,
JMF
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
Ken,
I greatly appreciate your reply, I also agree that the merger was the best alternative, given the circumstances. It saddens me to think that I will not be working for Enron, I had planned to retire from here. I pray that you will be at peace with your decision and that you will have a happy retirement, put it all behind you and know that you did everything you could and we have a great amount of respect and appreciation for you. We will definitely miss you and your leadership. I hope that Dynegy appreciates the value that they are obtaining and the gift of the talented and innovative employees that they will be getting. Everything will work out for the best.
Thank you again for your response.
Always dedicated,
Delia Walters
Graphic Designer
Marcom
From: Kenneth Lay/ENRON@enronXgate@enronXgate on 11/12/2001 09:53 AM
Sent by: Tori L Wells/ENRON@enronXgate
To: Delia Walters/HOU/EES@EES
cc:
Subject: RE: Fund raiser for Enron
Delia:
I very much appreciate your e-mail and agree with most of what you said. But for very practical reasons, the management and the Board decided a merger with Dynegy was the best alternative for Enron.
Thank you,
Ken
-----Original Message-----
From: Walters, Delia
Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2001 10:05 AM
To: Lay, Kenneth
Subject: Fund raiser for Enron
Dear Mr. Lay,
My manager and I were discussing the possibility of doing a fund raiser for Enron. We contributed an absorbant amount of money to charities this year and last, would it not be possible to raise money to help our company. Do a little belt tightening. We could do without the Christmas party, do without our bonuses and next year at this time, when we are back on top, it would be a sweeter glory knowing that the employees helped turn everything around. I have spoken with my HR rep and several other employees about this possibility and we feel that we would be able to raise a substantial amount of money. Please let me know what your view on this would be and we will work on what steps we need to take to make it happen.
Thank you for your time.
Delia Walters
Graphic Designer EES Marcom
The greater the obstacle, the more glory in overcoming it.
--Moliere
It does not matter how many times you get knocked down, but how many times you get up.
--Vince Lombardi
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
Barry, I added a some language to th disclaimer.
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
The report named: NG - Price P/L <http://trv.corp.enron.com/linkFromExcel.asp?report_cd=10&report_name=NG+-+Price+P/L&category_cd=5&category_name=FINANCIAL&toc_hide=1&sTV1=5&TV1Exp=Y¤t_efct_date=11/19/2001>, published as of 11/19/2001 is now available for viewing on the website.
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
---------------------- Forwarded by Susan Scott/ET&S/Enron on 10/12/2000
02:22 PM ---------------------------
Susan Scott
10/12/2000 01:10 PM
To: [email protected]
cc: Jeffery Fawcett/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
Subject: agreements
Mark, Jeff Fawcett asked me to forward the attached documents to you. One is
an interconnect agreement and one is an operating agreement. I would
describe both as "examples" rather than "forms," since every deal is
different and we don't really have a standard form we use. I hope that these
are helpful; if you have any questions at all, please do not hesitate to
contact me.
Susan
713-853-0596
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
In Energy Shortages, New Demand for Enron
The New York Times, 04/01/01
PULL THE PLUG / Not enough sunshine on politics of water board
Houston Chronicle, 04/01/01
USA: Exxon Mobil tops Fortune 500 list, replacing GM.
Reuters English News Service, 04/01/01
Exxon Mobil Tops 2001 Ranking of the Fortune 500; Oil giant replaces GM at
top of list after 15 years; Mega-Retailer Wal-Mart is No. 2
Business Wire, 04/01/01
Exxon Mobil Tops Fortune 500 List Amid Record Revenue; GM Drops to Third
Dow Jones Business News, 04/01/01
Exxon Mobil Replaces General Motors Atop Fortune 500 (Update1)
Bloomberg, 04/01/01
India: Maharashtra panel on SEB to submit report on April 10
Business Line (The Hindu), 04/01/01
The Winter of Our Disconnect ENERGY AND THE MAKING OF MODERN CALIFORNIA; By
James C. Williams; University of Akron Press: 465 pp., $49.95, $24.95 paper
THE NATURAL GAS MARKET Sixty Years of Regulation and Deregulation; By Paul W.
MacAvoy; Yale University Press: 140 pp., $35
Los Angeles Times, 04/01/01
India: CM objects to 'dumping' of IAS officers
The Hindu, 03/31/01
BROADBAND SERVICES: MILES TO GO
Computers Today, 03/31/01
Money and Business/Financial Desk; Section 3
In Energy Shortages, New Demand for Enron
By ELIZABETH R. SMITH
04/01/2001
The New York Times
Page 13, Column 1
c. 2001 New York Times Company
CALIFORNIA'S rolling blackouts and a looming energy crisis in other parts of
the country are stoking investor interest in companies positioned to reap
benefits from the power shortages.
Many investors, stunned by the market's precipitous fall, see energy as one
of the few sectors with a promising profit outlook.
And in that so-called energy merchant sector, the Enron Corporation stands
out as the industry leader. Based in Houston, it buys and sells wholesale
electricity, natural gas and scores of other commodities, including broadband
capacity for data-delivery services. In the fourth quarter of 2000, Enron's
revenue more than tripled, to $40.75 billion, from the period a year earlier.
That mushrooming revenue can be traced to the unprecedented surge in the
price of electricity and natural gas, particularly in California. On Tuesday,
California power regulators approved a 46 percent increase in electricity
rates, the largest in the state's history. Electricity shortfalls have also
been predicted for New York City this summer.
Despite its red-hot market, Enron is no bargain. Its share price surged 87
percent in 2000, to end the year at $83.125, up from $44.375 a year earlier.
It hit a 12-month, intraday high of $90.75 on Aug. 23, around the time that
California's utilities first sounded the alarm. And even though Enron has
taken some hits this year, the stock closed at $58.10 on Friday, 39.5 times
its 2001 earnings per share, well above its peers. On March 22, it fell to a
12-month low of $51.51 amid concerns about possible layoffs in its broadband
operations, but rebounded after Jeffrey K. Skilling, the chief executive,
assured investors that all was well in broadband.
Enron's edge is its sheer size and its recognized competence in helping
corporate clients cope with unprecedented swings in electricity prices. Enron
, in turn, charges a premium to manage the risk of energy price movements,
said Donato J. Eassey, a natural-gas analyst at Merrill Lynch. ''They have
market intelligence that is second to none,'' he said. ''They help firms
lower the cost by avoiding the spot market for power.''
The value of Enron's broadband effort and its core wholesale energy
operations have yet to be fully reflected in its stock price, he added,
predicting that shares will climb to $99.20 in 12 months.
Raymond C. Niles, an analyst at Salomon Smith Barney, also likes Enron
because of its dominance. The company has unit operating margins that are two
to three times that of its closest competitor, Dynegy, in wholesale energy,
he said: ''When the heat is on literally, people need a company like Enron
for physical delivery because it has so many ways to get them that
resource.'' He predicted that the stock would rise to $100 within 12 months.
Neither analyst is worried about developments in India, where Enron was
forced to invoke government guarantees to recoup payment for power generated
at its Dabhol power plant in the state of Maharashtra.
OTHER experts favor Enron because it is not just a pure power play. The
company, which is shedding many of its hard assets, has bet heavily on its
prospects for buying and selling broadband capacity. Skeptics say the demand
for broadband is nowhere near as immediate as the need for energy, but Amy M.
Jaffe, a senior energy adviser at the James A. Baker III Institute for Public
Policy at Rice University in Houston, said Enron was smart to move into
broadband.
''They might be in broadband too early, but that's O.K., she said, ''There
will be demand for it.''
Enron's expansion into data delivery, as well as its market-making of energy
commodities, help distinguish it from classic energy businesses like oil
companies, she said.
Lawrence R. Fuller, a senior portfolio manager at the Merrill Lynch
Fundamental Growth fund, says Enron is his largest energy holding.
''The company is controversial because its valuation is very high,'' Mr.
Fuller said. ''But they have a tremendous lead over their rivals and a
mastery of their business. You have tremendous economies of scale here that
drive their profit.''
Copyright , 2000 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
OUTLOOK
Editorials
PULL THE PLUG / Not enough sunshine on politics of water board
Staff
04/01/2001
Houston Chronicle
4 STAR
2
(Copyright 2001)
The time has come to pull the plug on the Houston Area Water Corp., the
citizen board called "the Hawk" that is in the process of recommending a
company to design, build and operate a water plant at Lake Houston.
The members of the Hawk board appear to have done their job thoroughly and
conscientiously. The board's chairman, attorney David Berg, has been
commendably outspoken about his concerns for the bidding process and the
wherewithal of Azurix Corp., a troubled affiliate of energy giant Enron Corp.
and one of three companies in the final running for the contract.
However, the political maneuverings and pressures being placed behind the
scenes on both city staff evaluating the bid proposals and the Hawk board
bear much more scrutiny than can be gained in the format of this
quasi-private corporation.
City Attorney Anthony Hall, reported the Chronicle's Mary Flood, started an
hourlong, heated argument with Berg at a March 21 mayoral fund-raiser over
the possibility that Azurix, rumored as the favorite of Mayor Lee Brown's
administration, might not win the bid.
Sources familiar with the argument told Flood that Hall threatened Berg that
he would dismantle the Hawk if the process that kept Azurix as the winning
recommendation was not followed. Hall denied he said anything like that,
saying his complaints were about procedures. Berg would not comment
specifically on that matter.
Hall, according to Flood's report, said he told Berg that because the
companies had relied on a long-established formula for choosing the
front-runner, it would invite trouble to change or ignore the formula now.
But the companies said they were never told about the formula and have had
nothing specific to rely on about how the staff or the Hawk board would make
its decision.
The pressure brought to bear on the Hawk, in such an unsavory way and without
public controls, is extremely troubling. These boards clearly were never
intended to handle projects so politically divisive, with so much money at
stake.
The water plant contract under bid is worth $150 million. The water project
it is part of could reach $2 billion.
State Rep. Garnet Coleman, D-Houston, who wrote the statute allowing local
government corporations such as Hawk, said he never intended these citizen
boards to handle projects as large as the water plant.
Politicians who want to guide this process ought to be willing to do it
openly and face both the public scrutiny and the consequences of their
actions.
For that reason - not because the bid award may not go the way the city
administration wants it to - the Hawk corporation should be dissolved.
Copyright , 2000 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
USA: Exxon Mobil tops Fortune 500 list, replacing GM.
04/01/2001
Reuters English News Service
(C) Reuters Limited 2001.
NEW YORK, April 1 (Reuters) - Exxon Mobil Corp. , aided by higher oil prices,
ousted automaker General Motors Corp. from the No. 1 ranking in the Fortune
500 list of the largest American companies, the business magazine said on
Sunday.
"The country faced an energy crunch as the drain on resources from several
years of economic expansion collided with utility deregulation, soaring
natural gas prices, and OPEC's maneuvering to keep oil prices high," Lee
Clifford, a writer for the Magazine, said the article about the reasons
behind Exxon's gain from the No. 3 spot in 1999.
With revenues for 2000 at a record $210 billion, Exxon, the most profitable
company with $17.7 billion in net income in 2000, outpaced No. 2 Wal-Mart by
$17 billion and No. 3 GM by $26 billion.
On the flip side of the surge for energy companies, high oil prices increased
the cost of doing business for most companies, and had a big impact on
corporate profits last year.
Five out of the top 15 companies made less money than they did in 1999.
Profits rose overall by 8.4 percent, down significantly from the prior year's
28.7 percent growth.
Rounding out the top ten of the Fortune 500 in order behind Exxon Mobil,
Wal-Mart and GM: Ford Motor Co. ($180.6 billion in 2000 revenues); General
Electric Co. ($129.9 billion); Citigroup ($111.8 billion); Enron Corp.
($100.8 billion); International Business Machines Corp. ($88.4 billion); AT&T
Corp. ($66.0 million); and Verizon Communications ($64.7 billion).
Copyright , 2000 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Exxon Mobil Tops 2001 Ranking of the Fortune 500; Oil giant replaces GM at
top of list after 15 years; Mega-Retailer Wal-Mart is No. 2
04/01/2001
Business Wire
(Copyright (c) 2001, Business Wire)
NEW YORK--(BUSINESS WIRE)--April 1, 2001--Exxon Mobil vaulted into the top
spot on the annual FORTUNE 500 ranking of the largest American companies,
replacing 15-year veteran GM.
With revenues for 2000 at a record $210 billion, Exxon outpaced No. 2
Wal-Mart by $17 billion and No. 3 GM by $26 billion. The FORTUNE 500 ranking
has been dominated by two industries -- cars and oil -- since its inception
in 1955: in 47 years, only two companies have been at the top of the list,
Exxon (which merged with Mobil in 1999) and GM. The 2001 FORTUNE 500 list and
related stories are available at www.fortune.com beginning at 6:00 p.m. ET
Sunday, April 1.
Exxon Mobil wasn't the only oil company to jump in the rankings. "The country
faced an energy crunch as the drain on resources from several years of
economic expansion collided with utility deregulation, soaring natural gas
prices, and OPEC's maneuvering to keep oil prices high," FORTUNE's Lee
Clifford writes in the introduction to the list. Those high prices helped
other energy companies strike it rich: Duke Energy (No. 17) and Reliant
Energy (No. 55) nearly doubled their revenues to catapult up the list, as did
diversified energy companies like Enron (No. 7) and Dynegy (No. 54). "Of
course, should energy prices fall, these companies will have a tough time
hanging onto their new spots on the FORTUNE 500," Clifford says.
On the flip side of the surge for energy companies, high oil prices increased
the cost of doing business for most companies, and had a big impact on
corporate profits last year. Five out of the top 15 companies made less money
than they did in 1999. Profits rose overall by 8.4%, down significantly from
last year's 28.7% growth. Together, the FORTUNE 500 generated $7.2 trillion
in sales (up more than 13% from last year), made $444 billion in profits, and
employed 24 million people. No. 1 Exxon Mobil was the most profitable
company, with profits rising 124% to $17.7 billion.
No. 2 Wal-Mart, with revenues of $193 billion, is the largest employer in the
FORTUNE 500, with 1.2 million employees (about the same as the population of
Idaho). Geographically, California and New York top the state list with 55
company headquarters each (New York City tops the city list with 40 company
headquarters). Texas comes in third with 45 companies (including Irving-based
Exxon Mobil, the No. 1 company; Houston is second on the city list with 20
companies), Illinois is fourth with 39 and Ohio is fifth with 20 companies on
the list.
In related stories on FORTUNE 500 companies, Alex Taylor III looks at Exxon
Mobil's well-oiled profit-pumping machine. Carol Loomis visits Sandy Weill at
Citigroup (No. 6) to see how an acquisition addict manages the world's most
complicated company. Nelson Schwartz reveals how a toothpaste maker,
Colgate-Palmolive (No. 201), has outperformed Jack Welch's GE (for 17 years).
Devin Leonard asks who's the boss at Viacom (No. 101).
The April 16 issue of FORTUNE is available on newsstands beginning April 9.
For more information, or to schedule an interview with a FORTUNE writer or
editor, see contacts below. THE TOP 25 OF THE 2001 FORTUNE 500
(Rankings reflect revenues of previous year)
Rank Rank Revenue in % CHANGE
2000 1999 millions FROM 1999
1 3 Exxon Mobil
Irving, T.X. 210,392.0 28.4
2 2 Wal-Mart Stores
Bentonville, Ark. 193,295.0 15.9
3 1 General Motors
Detroit, Mich 184,632.0 4.6
4 4 Ford Motor
Dearborn, Mich. 180,598.0 11.1
5 5 General Electric
Fairfield, Conn. 129,853.0 16.3
6 7 Citigroup
New York 111,826.0 36.4
7 18 Enron
Houston, T.X. 100,789.0 151.3
8 6 Int'l. Business Machines
Armonk, N.Y. 88,396.0 1.0
9 8 AT&T
New York 65,981.0 5.8
10 33 Verizon Communications
New York 64,707.0 95.1
11 9 Philip Morris
New York 63,276.0 2.5
12 31 J.P Morgan Chase
New York 60,065.0 78.2
13 11 Bank of America Corp.
Charlotte, N.C. 57,747.0 12.4
14 12 SBC Communications
San Antonio, T.X. 51,476.0 4.0
15 10 Boeing
Seattle 51,321.0 (11.5)
16 28 Texaco
White Plains, N.Y. 51,130.0 43.3
17 69 Duke Energy
Charlotte, N.C. 49,318.0 126.8
18 14 Kroger
Cincinnati 49,000.4 8.0
19 13 Hewlett-Packard
Palo Alto 48,782.0 -
20 35 Chevron
San Francisco 48,069.0 47.1
21 15 State Farm Insurance Cos.
Bloomington, Il. 47,863.1 7.2
22 17 American International Group
New York 45,972.0 13.1
23 21 Home Depot
Atlanta 45,738.0 19.0
24 30 Morgan Stanley Dean Witter
New York 45,413.0 33.9
25 29 Merrill Lynch
New York 44,872.0 28.7
CONTACT: FORTUNE, New York Susan Brown, 212/522-4071 [email protected]
or Caroline Plauche, 212/522-2134 [email protected] or Terry
McDevitt, 212/522-7149 [email protected]
18:10 EDT APRIL 1, 2001
Copyright , 2000 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Exxon Mobil Tops Fortune 500 List Amid Record Revenue; GM Drops to Third
04/01/2001
Dow Jones Business News
(Copyright (c) 2001, Dow Jones & Company, Inc.)
Associated Press
NEW YORK -- Surging U.S. energy prices gave oil, gasoline and power companies
new fuel in their climb through the ranks of the annual Fortune 500.
Oil giant Exxon Mobil Corp. (XOM) posted its highest-ever revenue of $210
billion in 2000, boosting it to No. 1 on the list from its 1999 ranking as
No. 3. General Motors Co., the world's biggest auto maker, had revenue of
$184.6 billion and fell to No. 3 from No. 1.
Other energy companies also fared well in 2000, with Enron Corp. (ENE) rising
to No. 7 from No. 18. Duke Energy Corp. (DUK) shot up to No. 17 from 69 and
Reliant Energy Inc. (REI) made it up to No. 55 from 114.
The list of the largest publicly held companies, ranked by fiscal-year
revenue, has been compiled annually since 1955 by the editors of Fortune.
Detroit-based GM, which had held the top spot on the list for 15 years,
trails No. 2 Wal-Mart Stores Inc. (WMT).
Energy companies benefited from a surge in revenue brought about by falling
supplies, utility deregulation, soaring natural-gas prices and OPEC's
maneuvering to keep oil prices high. In the past year, crude oil has sold for
as much as $30 a barrel, and gasoline cost more than $2 a gallon last summer
in some parts of the U.S.
Other energy firms advancing included Texaco Inc. (TX), which went from No.
28 to No. 16; Chevron Corp. (CHV), which was ranked No. 20, up from No. 35;
and Dynegy Inc. (DYN), which rose to No. 54 from No. 112.
San Francisco-based Chevron agreed to buy Texaco in October for $35.1 billion
in stock, plus assumed debt of $7.5 billion. The deal is expected to close
this summer pending review by the U.S. Federal Trade Commission.
The Internet slowdown and uncertainty about the economy hurt a number of
companies, particularly telecom firms. AT&T Corp. (T) fell to No. 9 from No.
8.
But a merger helped Verizon Communications Inc. (VZ), formed when Bell
Atlantic and GTE combined in May, leapfrog to the No. 10 spot from No. 33,
climbing past rivals WorldCom Inc. (WCOM) at No. 32, and SBC Communications
(SBC) at No. 14.
America Online Inc., which became the first purely Internet company to break
into the list last year at No. 337, rose to No. 271. Since then, it has
become AOL Time Warner Inc. (AOL) with its acquisition of Time Warner. The
combined company's revenue of $36.2 billion would have made it No. 39 on the
year 2000 list, but the deal didn't close until early this year.
Computer companies were led by International Business Machines Corp. (IBM),
which stayed in the top 10 but fell from sixth last year to No. 8.
Microsoft Corp. (MSFT) rose to 79 from 84, and Cisco Systems Inc. (CSCO),
which makes equipment for the Internet, advanced to 107 from 146, despite the
dot-com crash.
Wal-Mart, which remained in the No. 2 spot, had revenue of more than $210
billion. It also has the most employees of any company on the list, with more
than 1.2 million world-wide.
The top 10 also included Ford Motor Co. (F), the world's No. 2 auto maker, at
No. 4, a position it held last year. General Electric Co. (GE) stayed at No.
5 and Citigroup Inc. (C), the nation's largest financial-services company,
rose from seventh place to No. 6.
Total profits for the 500 corporations grew 8.4% for the year, down from
1999's level of 28.7%, to $444 billion. Revenue grew by more than 13% to a
combined $7.2 trillion for 2000. They employed more than 24 million workers.
The top 20:
1. Exxon Mobil, Irving, Texas, 3, $210.392 billion
2. Wal-Mart Stores, Bentonville, Ark., 2, $193.295
3. General Motors, Detroit, 1, $184.632
4. Ford Motor, Dearborn, Mich., 4, $180.598
5. General Electric, Fairfield, Conn., 5, $129.853
6. Citigroup, New York, 7, $111.826
7. Enron, Houston, 18, $100.789
8. International Business Machines, Armonk, N.Y., 6, $88.396
9. AT&T, New York, 8, $65.981
10. Verizon Communications, New York, 33, $64.707
11. Philip Morris, New York, 9, $63.276
12. J.P. Morgan Chase, New York, 31, $60.065
13. Bank of America, Charlotte, N.C., 11, $57.747
14. SBC Communications, San Antonio, 12, $51.476
15. Boeing, Seattle, 10, $51.321
16. Texaco, White Plains, N.Y., 28, $51.130
17. Duke Energy, Charlotte, N.C., 69, $49.318
18. Kroger, Cincinnati, 14, $49.000
19. Hewlett-Packard, Palo Alto, Calif., 13, $48.782
20. Chevron, San Francisco, 35, $48.069
Copyright (c) 2001 Dow Jones & Company, Inc.
All Rights Reserved
Copyright , 2000 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Exxon Mobil Replaces General Motors Atop Fortune 500 (Update1)
2001-04-01 21:40 (New York)
(Adds that citation is from Fortune.com Web site)
New York, April 1 (Bloomberg) -- Exxon Mobil Corp. topped the
new Fortune 500 ranking of the biggest U.S. companies, replacing
General Motors Corp., as higher oil prices contributed to $210.4
billion in revenue last year.
GM fell to third, behind Wal-Mart Stores Inc., Fortune said
on its Fortune.com Web site. In the list's 55-year history, only
GM and Exxon have been No. 1. Energy companies fared well this
year, with Enron Corp. moving to No. 7 from 18th and Duke Energy
Corp. going to No. 17 from 69.
Wal-Mart had $193.3 billion in revenue, about $8.7 billion
more than GM, Fortune said. The retailer employs 1.2 million
people, more than any other company on the list. Ford Motor Co.
was fourth and General Electric Co. fifth.
Rounding out the top 10 were financial services provider
Citigroup Inc., computer maker International Business Machines
Corp. and telecommunications companies AT&T Corp. and Verizon
Communications Inc.
The high oil and natural-gas prices that helped energy
companies hurt other industries, Fortune said. Five of the top 15
made less money than in 1999, and profits rose 8.4 percent, less
than previous year's 29 percent increase, Fortune said.
California and New York led all states among the listed
companies with 55 headquarters each. Texas is home to 45 companies
on the list, while Illinois has 39 and Ohio has 20. Forty of the
companies are based in New York City, twice as many as in Houston,
the No. 2 city.
India: Maharashtra panel on SEB to submit report on April 10
04/01/2001
Business Line (The Hindu)
Copyright (C) 2001 Kasturi & Sons Ltd (KSL); Source: World Reporter (TM) -
Asia Intelligence Wire
MUMBAI, March 31. THE Godbole Committee, set up to examine the problems faced
by the Maharashtra State Electricity Board, will submit the first part of its
report on April 10. The first part, to be completed by April 9, will be
tabled in the House during the ongoing Assembly session, according to
sources.
The committee, headed by the former Chairman of the MSEB, Mr Madhav Godbole,
was formed last month to examine power purchases from Enron and other
independent power producers. The six-member committee would suggest
restructuring measures in part two of its report.
The committee met officials of IDFC and other financial institutions, said a
senior MSEB official. Enron officials, financial institutions and members of
the public have made presentations to the committee, apart from the MSEB top
brass.
The panel will review the position of overall demand and supply of power to
industries in Maharashtra with special reference to IPPs and purchase of
power by MSEB. It would also review the power purchase agreements, already
signed as well as proposed.
The committee is to examine the cost of DPC power and its distribution,
mounting losses of MSEB due to DPC power purchases and other implications.
- Our Bureau
Copyright , 2000 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Book Review; Book Review Desk
The Winter of Our Disconnect ENERGY AND THE MAKING OF MODERN CALIFORNIA; By
James C. Williams; University of Akron Press: 465 pp., $49.95, $24.95 paper
THE NATURAL GAS MARKET Sixty Years of Regulation and Deregulation; By Paul W.
MacAvoy; Yale University Press: 140 pp., $35
D.J. WALDIE
D.J. Waldie is the author of "Holy Land: A Suburban Memoir." His forthcoming
book, in collaboration with photographer Marissa Roth, is "Real City.'
04/01/2001
Los Angeles Times
Home Edition
3
Copyright 2001 / The Times Mirror Company
Could we have foreseen the winter of our disconnect? Could we have predicted
January's blackouts and this summer's promise of more to come or counted in
advance the windfall billions collected by Sun Belt power suppliers with
shiny, abstract names like Enron and Dynegy or the millions more owed them by
California's near-bankrupt utilities with their plodding 19th-century
gas-and-electric names?
The short answer is yes. We should have seen the darkness coming. We saw,
instead, the brightness of our beliefs about this golden place. We had
mistaken California for a continent-nearly a universe-from which everything
we wanted would come endlessly because we expected it to. California at the
beginning of 2000 was turning raw aspiration into profit as quickly as
post-Civil War America had and with nearly the same confident mixture of
technological bravura and financial cunning. In blacked-out, deregulated
January, after the briefest of gilded ages, we found that California really
is an island on the land, just as its most perceptive observers had said it
was, and that California's energy resources are as fragile and limited as any
island's.
We would have been better served if, in our haste, we had paused to read two
timely books on the history of power and its regulation. While they do not
foreshadow California's current electrical mess, they throw some historical
light on why we're in the dark.
In "The Natural Gas Market: Sixty Years of Regulation and Deregulation" by
Paul W. MacAvoy, the problem is the inadequacy of the regulatory models that
states and federal agencies have applied to natural gas production and
distribution since the 1930s. None, MacAvoy says, made natural gas plentiful,
cheap and profitable all at the same time, and no one-producers, pipeline
operators, retailers or consumers-has benefited from the failed attempts. The
current natural gas shortage, driving up household bills and the operating
costs of California's gas-fueled electricity plants, is the result, MacAvoy
would argue, of regulatory approaches that can't work.
MacAvoy believes a rational market could be made for natural gas through
complete deregulation, except for the irrationality of consumers. They don't
see natural gas as a substance-less commodity, to be priced and delivered by
the workings of the market forces that interest MacAvoy, a professor at
Yale's School of Management. Consumers see gas-and electricity-as something
real, like sunlight or air, that flows predictably from a "second nature" of
pipelines and transmission towers. The presence in the landscape of these
grids-like the grids of aqueducts and highways-is so necessary and expected
that ordinary nature is unimaginable without them. Californians have
superimposed a man-made "second nature" of energy production and distribution
on the state's unforgiving landscapes too, but our unique problem is a Gold
Rush mythology of abundance. Limitless power is part of the myth, beginning
with the belief in the 1860s and 1870s that California's hills, having
yielded gold for the taking, would yield coal just as abundantly to power the
state's transition to an industrial economy. California had plenty of gold,
it turned out, but almost no coal.
Nor could the state produce enough firewood where people needed it or
kerosene to fuel its lamps or manpower to till its fields. Wood, coal,
kerosene and labor were "power crises" in the 19th century that were
ultimately resolved by technical innovation, resource substitution and
historically higher energy costs for California consumers. In the 20th
century, new believers preached that the Sierra Nevada foothills would flow
with endless hydropower to keep city lights shining, that more oil fields
were ready to be discovered to fuel the state's power plants and that nuclear
technology would make electricity too cheap to meter. It hardly mattered that
there was no foundation for these beliefs either.
Our resilient faith in a "second nature" of power that is adequate to the
myth of California gives James C. Williams' "Energy and the Making of Modern
California" its poignancy. Williams, whose book was published in hardcover in
1997, does not forecast the "deregulation crisis" of 2001, but he might have.
Speaking of Americans generally, Williams says: "They have believed each new
energy resource to be without fault, to be infinitely abundant, and,
therefore, to have the potential to effect utopian societal change. Moreover,
people's faith in an energy resource seems to persist until ... its
shortcomings are obvious, and only then do they see it cannot bring utopia.
Yet the failure of a resource to live up to their expectations has not seemed
to dampen their enthusiasm, as they simply transfer the myth from a fallen
energy resource to the next resource appropriated for use." In 1996, the
California Legislature simply substituted a deregulated electricity
marketplace as the next energy resource expected to work on utopian
principles.
Williams ends his account of California's energy history at the hopeful
moment in the late 1980s when "a diversified, innovative, and less
centralized energy paradigm" seemed ascendant. Although not as radical as
environmental purists wanted, he says, California's emphasis on energy
conservation and alternative power sources-solar, geothermal, wind and
biomass among them-defined a more benign and flexible "soft energy" path
paralleling the "hard energy" path of gas-fired steam generators, nuclear
plants and hydroelectric dams. Between 1973 and 1988, Williams reports,
California's population grew 37%, and its economy, as measured in goods and
services, grew 46%, while the state's energy consumption grew only 8%, in
part because of some of the strictest standards in the world for building
insulation and appliance efficiency. Jerry Brown, California governor from
1974 through 1982, was right, after all: Weather-stripping and windmills do
make a difference.
Brown's career needs no rehabilitation now, as he begins his campaign for a
second term as mayor of Oakland, but the debacle of electrical deregulation
is set to consume other political futures when electricity bills jump 40% in
May to a projected 100% by the end of summer. Sen. Steve Peace (D-El Cajon)
and Public Utilities Commission President Loretta Lynch will take the fall;
Gov. Gray Davis probably will, too.
The blame for the state's slide into deregulated chaos goes well beyond
today's cast of bewildered politicians, but Californians are unlikely to
round up all the suspects-ourselves included-who might be made to answer for
it. We were too distracted by the collapse of the state's old economy in
1990, the L.A. riots, earthquakes and other disasters to attend to the tedium
of energy policy. No one seemed to notice how electricity deregulation,
launched without much meaningful debate in 1996, recycled the myth of energy
abundance that Williams lucidly details decade by decade (beginning in 1850),
or that deregulation required a rapid and sustained increase in generating
capacity if it was going to deliver the substantially lower electricity costs
promised for 2001. That was wishful thinking long before the legislature's
unanimous deregulation vote.
In 1994, John Bryson, chief executive of Southern California Edison, told the
California Public Utilities Commission, "Edison does not need any additional
power until at least 2005." Bryson's declaration that California faced an
energy glut-not a shortage-was in response to a controversial decision by the
PUC ordering the state's major utilities to purchase 1,400 megawatts of new
power annually beginning in 1998. The PUC order was driven by a 1992
California Energy Commission forecast, fairly accurate it turns out, that
Californians would need 55,819 megawatts of electricity in 2000. (The actual
usage was closer to 54,000 megawatts.)
To foster competitors to the state's largest utilities-Pacific Gas &
Electric, Edison and San Diego Gas & Electric-the PUC order also required
them to buy all this new power from independent suppliers, whose presence in
California's limited energy market would, the PUC believed, not only deliver
the required megawatts but also gradually cut consumer electric bills. In
addition, the PUC ordered the three utilities to buy part of this new power
from suppliers using alternative and renewable energy sources-windmills,
geothermal and solar -continuing California's successful experiment in a
parallel industry of "soft energy" supply.
The utilities resisted. With deregulation the goal of the Clinton
administration as much as of the power industry, the PUC's order to buy more
electricity-and expand the small-is-beautiful supply model that Williams
believed was possible in 1997 when his book was published-looked to the
utilities like the subsidization of future competitors. In 1995, Edison and
SDG&E convinced the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission that giving
environmentally friendly generators preferential treatment was illegal and
that California, in the midst of a business-crunching recession, didn't need
more power anyway. Under pressure from the federal commission, the PUC caved
in.
And Edison and SDG&E got exactly what they wanted-relief from new
competition, continued centralization of production within the traditional
utility grid and a PUC committed to demolishing the state's 80-year-old
system of utility regulation. The PUC even discouraged the utilities from
signing long-term supply contracts at current prices, because the PUC
professed to believe that deregulation would generate lower energy prices
more quickly than anyone expected.
To show stockholders that they were no longer the dowdy power companies of
the old economy, the utilities sweetened short-term profits by refusing to
invest in plant construction, spun off revenues from their PUC-regulated
divisions into stock buybacks and worked very hard for full deregulation.
Their victory a year later was a catastrophe.
The deregulation consumers got-in the ironic words of State Sen. Jim Brulte
(R-Rancho Cucamonga), "one of the most far-reaching and forward-thinking
pieces of legislation" in California history-was peculiarly Californian in
its degree of institutional amnesia. As political cover for legislators who
feared prices would immediately climb, the deregulation bill cut electricity
rates 10% and froze increases until March 2002. That gave residential
consumers and businesses no reason to switch to alternative power sources or
conserve more. The bill satisfied the interests of consumer advocates because
it promised to break the utilities' three-way monopoly on electricity
production and shrink the power of the PUC (seen as too friendly for too long
with the power companies it was supposed to regulate). Deregulation, however,
continued to shield profits at Edison, PG&E and SDG&E by guaranteeing them
$26 billion in revenue to cover their massive debt for nuclear power plant
construction. Deregulation also pleased environmentalists because they
thought it would take the state further down the "soft energy" path. The
deregulation bill encouraged the utilities to sell off their existing
fossil-fueled generators, but it failed to offer enough incentives for the
construction of environmentally friendly ones, despite the 12-year gap since
the construction of the last major power plant anywhere in California.
Finally, deregulation created a power market so fragmented that it was
ludicrously easy to manipulate when the thin surplus of power supply in the
West began evaporating in the summer of 2000, although the evidence is masked
by the effects of a drought in the Northwest (which has reduced hydropower)
and an unlucky combination of plant maintenance, air pollution limits idling
older plants and higher than expected costs for natural gas.
The price of bad luck, bad weather and the cunning of power suppliers was
staggering. At one point in December, electricity that cost $250 a
megawatt-hour to produce was priced by the power brokers of the California
Independent System Operator at $1,500 a megawatt-hour. That was the
negotiated price; the suppliers had asked for $2,000.
Deregulation had set up a divided marketplace, more irrational than any Paul
W. MacAvoy picks apart in his analysis of natural gas, in which the
California Power Exchange was a clearinghouse where buyers and sellers set
the price of electricity and the California Independent System Operator was
the "buyer of last resort" if occasional gaps between production and
distribution unexpectedly failed to meet daily demand. The arrangement began
unraveling in mid-1998, and the Power Exchange effectively collapsed as soon
as SDG&E became fully deregulated in July 2000, leaving the poorly trained
bureaucrats of the Cal-ISO in December and January to struggle to buy 30% of
the state's daily power needs at arbitrary prices they passed on to utility
company managers.
The spectacle of the Cal-ISO gratefully paying a 500% premium over the cost
of production to keep the lights on last winter was a lesson in "market
fundamentalism" with a vengeance. Californians, tutored by earnest
neo-conservatives such as Peace, believed that a deregulated market would
generate abundant low-cost power simply because that's what a market freed of
regulation would do, despite the evidence that this particular market was
based on false assumptions and likely to be manipulated by the energy
suppliers who designed it.
In an empty contest of metaphors in 1994 and 1995, the dead hand of state
regulation had lost to the invisible hand of the marketplace. We'll never
know if gradual expansion of competition within the framework of regulation
would have made California's power system more flexible and environmentally
sustainable and less costly to consumers, as Williams suggested it might.
'Power tends to corrupt," Lord Acton said. He didn't mean that the powerful
are necessarily brutal or cruel. He was criticizing the blinding power that
flows from unexamined convictions, and he was writing about the papacy of
Pope Pius IX, who forced the doctrine of papal infallibility on the Catholic
Church. The makers of deregulation-state legislators, consumer advocates, PUC
commissioners and environmentalists-were convinced that the market they
constructed was infallible too. That belief led them to pursue their own
self-interest.
In the long run, consumers can expect deregulation's perverse effects to
include significantly higher electricity bills as we pay off $30 billion in
new debt, diminished local authority over power plant construction and
further disarray among the small-scale producers of renewable energy. The
failure of deregulation also will recast the way power is distributed in
California, as the state hesitantly moves to control part of the electrical
grid in exchange for bonding the utilities' debt. This first step in creating
a state power authority is being resisted by power suppliers, who rightly
fear that public anger over mismanagement of the power system has hardened
into sympathy for public ownership, as it almost did in the early 1920s.
In the short run, the failure of deregulation will determine if California's
hopeful new economy plays out as something more than the latest of the
state's many booms. There were extractive ones-gold, cattle, wheat, oil,
suburban house lots and military hardware. And there were booms that wove
myths-health-seeking in the sunshine, tourism, the movies and all the lost
dot-coms of last year. Apart from the good and the bad they've done our
state, our booms have reflected the belief, bordering on religious faith,
that what is true about California today will be true permanently.
California's utopian expectations about energy, whose history Williams
diligently surveys, are central to that myth. It sustained our optimism about
California's ability to power itself in the past. It's fueling our pessimism
today, as we lead ourselves deeper into the dark.
PHOTO: 'Nevada Transmission Line Tower at Night," by John Sexton; from
"Places of Power: The Aesthetics of Technology" by John Sexton with a
foreword by Walter Cronkite (Ventana Editions: 128 pp., $60);
Copyright , 2000 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
India: CM objects to 'dumping' of IAS officers
Our Special Correspondent
03/31/2001
The Hindu
Copyright (C) 2001 Kasturi & Sons Ltd (KSL); Source: World Reporter (TM) -
Asia Intelligence Wire
BANGALORE, MARCH 30. The Chief Minister, Mr. S.M. Krishna, today spoke out
strongly against the "dumping" of IAS officers on the State and said a stage
would soon be reached when Karnataka would have to reject such postings.
He was replying to the discussion on the Budget estimates for 2001-2002 in
the Legislative Council. The House later passed the Appropriation Bill moved
by the Chief Minister who also holds the Finance portfolio.
Mr. Krishna, who received a round of applause for his stance against the
large number of IAS and IPS officers in the State, said the strength of the
IAS officers was swelling. "It is only Karnataka which is getting a large
number of officers from the other States while it is not the case in Andhra
Pradesh and Tamil Nadu."
The Chief Minister said it was not his desire to question the competence of
IAS officers from outside the State. "But then I have to be proud of my own
people. Even the few people who pass the central services examination from
the State are not posted here. A Karnataka girl who passed the IAS last year
was posted to the north-east despite her request to be posted in her home
State."
Mr. Krishna, reacting to a suggestion by some of the legislators that the
House adopt a resolution on this matter, said he would rather bring the
matter to the notice of the Union Home Minister. The Centre should rethink on
this matter. There was also the need for Karnataka to have a share of the top
posts at the Central level. "I am only expressing the feelings of the people
in public administration. The Centre should focus its attention on this
matter."
Referring to the power sector reforms and the Union Government selecting the
State as one of the first beneficiaries, the Chief Minister said the
transmission and distribution losses in the State were 38 per cent while the
national average was around 40 per cent. Karnataka could not be an exception
from what was happening in the other parts of the country although efforts
were now being made to improve the grid situation and ensure metering of all
electrical installations, which was the key to checking power theft.
He said it was a blessing in disguise that the State had dropped the 1,000 MW
Cogentrix power project in Mangalore. Otherwise the cost of power would have
been very high, not unlike what Maharashtra was now facing with Enron. The
construction of the Alamatti power project has been handed over to the
Karnataka Power Corporation Ltd. since the private sector Chamundi
corporation had quoted Rs. 1,400 crores for the project while the KPCL had
quoted Rs. 700 crores. "Our KPCL has a proven track record and the State
Government decided to go with it."The Chief Minister sounded a note of
caution to the excise sector and said the Government would come down heavily
on it if it continued with tax evasion (sale of seconds liquor). The
Government had set an ambitious target of Rs. 2,086 crores for the coming
year, in contrast to Rs. 1,500 crores for 2000-2001. The revenue from excise
had dipped in the mid-Nineties and had registered a 20 per cent increase over
the past two years.
Referring to the interim report of the Administrative Reforms Commission
headed by Mr. Haranahalli Ramaswamy, he said the State had taken a giant step
forward in pruning the administrative machinery. Around 80 per cent of the
vacancies which had been frozen over the past decade had now been abolished.
Mr. Krishna said that the proposal to divert the waters of the west-flowing
Nethravati was only to provide drinking water to around 72 taluks in the
plains of the State. Such a diversion of a small quantum of the waters would
in no way affect the agricultural operations along the natural course of the
river. The Government would hold discussions with all the political leaders
before arriving at a decision on the proposal, he said. The Chief Minister
denied the Opposition charge on the financial position of the State and said
there was no question of walking into a debt trap. The loans sought were well
within limits. The budget presented by him was quite transparent and there
was nothing that he had hidden from the public. The focus of the budget this
year was on agriculture.
Copyright , 2000 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
COUNTRY BUZZ
BROADBAND SERVICES: MILES TO GO
SUDHIR CHOWDHARY
03/31/2001
Computers Today
76
Copyright 2001 Living Media India Ltd
No incessant dialling and always-on Internet connection sans fat telephone
bills. The promise was also of enriched and compelling content on the
desktop, in the living room, and on the field-anytime, anywhere-at a whizzing
speed. Unfortunately, these prospects don't seem to have fired the
imagination of home PC users in the country. The response to the first few
months of broadband connectivity in some affluent localities in Delhi and
Mumbai have been lukewarm, mainly because of the cost factor.
To make matters worse for the industry, major players like Spectranet and
Enron have made their intentions clear to exit from their broadband ventures
they have set up in Delhi and Maharashtra, respectively. Spectranet promoter
Atul Punj has decided to withdraw from the fibre optic network business and
concentrate on the family's core businesses of construction and pipelines.
Say top sources in the firm, the decision follows from the realisation that
the "business would be dominated by large groups and multinationals".
Analysts, too, opine that after a frenzied start, the broadband market will
settle down with fewer players. Reliance, Bharti Enterprises, BPL, Zee and a
few others are left in the fray.
Last fortnight, Enron also decided to exit from its broadband ventures in the
country. Along with MSEB and Global Telesystems, the company had proposed to
build a high-speed network in India to enable ISPs and corporate houses to
carry out their business efficiently. It had plans to build a Rs 600 crore
optical fibre cable network, covering 5,000 kms across Maharashtra.
Strategies to Cope
Why has broadband failed to take off in India? Siddhartha Ray, managing
director, Data Access, an affiliate of Richard Li's Pacific Convergence Corp.
(PCC) that has launched Network of the World (NOW) in India, quips, "It's
easy to talk about sexier technologies. But, are there any taker for them as
well?" According to him, shelling out more than Rs 1,000 per month besides
coughing up cash for a cable modem is not a sneeze for most of the home PC
users. Another reason, points out Ray, is that players like Spectranet can't
be compared to big giants like Reliance who are into a long haul. For
Spectranet, return on investment is vital and with the business plans already
going astray, they are desperate to get out of this venture, he points out.
While both the broadband players in Delhi, Spectranet and Mantra Online,
admit that there is future potential in the home segment for broadband, their
current subscription figures point out that the boom among home users for
broadband services is still a long way off.
Spectranet currently has around 1,000 subscribers in the home segment, while
Mantra has to make do with 500 only. As Spectranet managing director Uday
Punj says, "We are not aggressively marketing the home segment now, as the
potential in the business segment will any day outflank home demand." Only
that probably they won't be in the market to see that.
Spectranet, which was the first off the block in laying optical fibre
connections in Delhi, formally launched its services in October last year.
The company has already invested around Rs 160 crore in setting up 600 kms of
optical fibre in Delhi, Noida, Ghaziabad and Bangalore.
The other broadband player, Mantra Online, came with its Mantra-via-cable
offer last August. Mantra's broadband service has till date only covered a
few affluent colonies in Delhi.
While one big winner in the Delhi's not-so-hot broadband connections scene
has been the cable operators, who have provided the crucial last-mile
connectivity for both Mantra and Spectranet, via their existing network of
coaxial cables, a major deterrent in the spread of broadband has been the
exorbitant cost of the cable modem. They come at around Rs 15,000. The return
is still not alluring.
Return on Investment
Essentially, for the broadband environment the major costs include those of
the infrastructure and the subscriber. Those who are in the process of
optical fibre networks are investing about Rs 100-200 crore for covering
small towns to large cities.
More than 15 companies have already acquired infrastructure providers'
licences, which enable them to set up the network, right of way, towers and
infrastructure for end-to-end connectivity. These companies include industry
heavyweights like Reliance, Bharti, RPG, Satyam Infoway and Shyam. Two public
sector companies, Power Grid Corp. of India and Gas Authority, have also
entered the race. Spectranet, Reliable Internet, ICE Net.Net, RPG Netcom,
Atlanta Capital, Potential Solutions, S. Kumars, Satyam Infotel and Zoom are
the other companies that have got an IP licence.
Some of these companies plan to operate telephony services as well. These
include Reliance, Bharti and Shyam. The IP licences, which are free of cost,
enable them to set up the backbone network. These companies will acquire
national long distance (NLD) licences, which has an entry fee of Rs 500
crore, once their networks are ready.
Reliance has acquired the IP licence through a new company-Steadfast
Construction and Engineering-set up specially for this purpose. As per
Reliance's plans, it will first set up a network in 12 states. In two years,
it will cover the whole country. It has already started laying the cable in
major states, including Gujarat, Delhi and Uttar Pradesh. The company's NLD
plan has synergy with its existing telecom operations. It has basic service
licence for Gujarat and is operating cellular services in Madhya Pradesh,
Bihar, Orissa, the North East, West Bengal, Assam and Himachal Pradesh. It
covers more than 30 per cent of the geographical area of the country.
Therefore, it will also be able to use the same optical fibre network as the
backbone for its existing operations as well as for carrying long-distance
calls.
Similarly, Bharti has also announced its plans to enter the NLD service
segment. Through Spectranet, Bharti would be able to offer basic services in
Delhi and Bangalore, much ahead of the other players like Reliance and Essar.
Bharti, which has itself laid about 100 km of optic fibre in Delhi, has
applied for basic telephony licences in eight states, including Delhi and
Karnataka.
Great Expectations
Despite the hype, worldwide broadband penetration is presently very low. And
India is no exception. Take, for example, the United States where only 1.8
per cent of homes have broadband access, while 27 per cent have narrowband
access. However, most analysts say that in the next five years, at least 50
per cent of online homes in the US will have broadband access via modems.
However, the Asia-Pacific region is moving faster than the West as far as
broadband connectivity is concerned. For instance, Singapore is fully
broadband-wired. Similarly, Taiwan also has an extensive broadband network in
place. In India, it is expected that seven companies will soon be offering
their fibre-optic cable network commercially. Internet access via cable will
make further inroads into consumer homes as bandwidth prices shrink. It will
find more consumers in the institutional segment. But then even the cable TV
penetration is expected to grow only about 15 per cent in 2001. That makes
broadband initiative limp.
Copyright , 2000 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
Thank you!! Michelle
[email protected] on 12/06/2000 05:17:24 PM
To: [email protected]
cc:
Subject: Oxley
Michelle,
Attached is the document I sent you in Feb, 2000 regarding the waiver for
Oxley.
It is a single document and you don't have to unzip it.
Pat
- Waiver Benefits1.doc
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
Here is the final version. I'll bring copies with me tomorrow to Sacramento
and can drop them off at Hedy's office. I meet with Kari Dohn at 10 AM and
will be attending the AB 1890 Implementation Group meeting at 1:30. I can
drop off copies before I head out for the Dohn meeting. If there's anything
else, just let me know. Thanks.
Best,
Jeff
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
Andrew:
Attached are the forms.
Marie
Marie Heard
Senior Legal Specialist
Enron North America Corp.
Phone: (713) 853-3907
Fax: (713) 646-3490
[email protected]
-----Original Message-----
From: St. Clair, Carol
Sent: Friday, November 16, 2001 11:17 AM
To: Cook, Mary; Heard, Marie
Subject: FW: Allegheny
Carol St. Clair
EB 4539
713-853-3989 (phone)
713-646-8537 (fax)
281-382-1943 (cell phone)
8774545506 (pager)
281-890-8862 (home fax)
[email protected]
-----Original Message-----
From: Ralston, Andrew
Sent: Friday, November 16, 2001 10:51 AM
To: Bailey, Susan
Cc: St. Clair, Carol
Subject: Allegheny
Susan
I have been asked my business group to send a master netting agreement and collateral annex to Allegheny. Can you send me a form of those two agreements.
thanks
Andrew
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
My only comment relates to the Azurix reference ... it's not a significant
part of the biz and things have changed recently. i don't think it merits
reference.
Rick Buy@ECT
10/23/2000 02:59 PM
To: Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: Case Study
Steve- can you have someone take a look at the attached article and give me
your thoughts. There is a lot of information in there that I did not provide
but they must be picking up from literature. Thanks, Rick
---------------------- Forwarded by Rick Buy/HOU/ECT on 10/23/2000 02:57 PM
---------------------------
[email protected] on 10/23/2000 11:37:05 AM
To: [email protected]
cc: [email protected]
Subject: Case Study
Hi Rick,
As we discussed this morning.
Regards,
James
---------------------- Forwarded by James Lam/OWC on 10/23/2000 12:41 PM
---------------------------
James Lam
09/01/2000 05:09 PM EDT
To: [email protected]
cc: [email protected], Alan McNee <[email protected]>
Subject: Case Study (Document link: James Lam)
Hi Rick,
Thank you again for spending time with Alan and me this week on the Enron case
study for my book. Attached for your review is a draft that we put
together. I
think you will be happy with the tone and content of the case. Otherwise,
please call me to discuss any changes you might have.
(See attached file: 17_Enron-am-jl.doc)
Note that the case makes reference to three charts that you said you would
email
to me:
Organizational chart of the RAC Group and summary descriptions (we will use
this information to update this section of the case)
Dashboard approval sheet (cartoon version)
1-page flow chart of Board transaction approval process
Please provide these three charts and any changes you might have by Friday,
9/15. Thanks.
Regards,
James
212-541-8100
- 17_Enron-am-jl.doc
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
FYI. This memo is from Brent Price, the Chief Accounting Officer for EGM.
Regards, Alan
----- Forwarded by Alan Aronowitz/HOU/ECT on 11/14/2000 06:27 PM -----
Brent A Price
11/13/2000 04:16 PM
To: Mike McConnell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT@ECT, John L
Nowlan/HOU/ECT@ECT, George McClellan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Tawney/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Jere C Overdyke/HOU/ECT@ECT, Gary Hickerson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Eric
Gonzales/LON/ECT@ECT, Rick Bergsieker/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT,
Daniel Reck/HOU/ECT@ECT, Larry Lawyer/NA/Enron@Enron, Alan
Aronowitz/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Sally Beck/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott Earnest/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kevin
Sweeney/HOU/ECT@ECT, D Todd Hall/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sheila Glover/HOU/ECT@ECT, Eric
Groves/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bjorn Hagelmann/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Deal Approval Sheet (DASH) Process
Attached is a copy of the Deal Approval Sheet (DASH) that is to be used as
part of the transaction approval process within EGM and a copy of the
transaction approval requirements.
All transactions (capital expenditures or risk adjusted capital) in excess of
$500,000 must have a completed DASH and sign off by the following groups:
o applicable EGM business unit management
o EGM Office of the Chairman
o Legal
o RAC
o EGM Operations
o Enron Capital Management
o appropriate level of Enron Corp. management (if required, see attached)
Capital expenditures include any acquisitions/divestitures of assets,
offerings of debt, subordinated debt, equity or partnership capital or
entering into a commodity or financial position that results in an exposure
outside of Board approved limits. Capital expenditure amounts embedded in a
commodity price to a counterparty should be analyzed separately for DASH
purposes and authorized by the appropriate entity.
Please contact me at ext. 37647 or Bjorn Hagelmann (RAC) at ext. 57984 if y0u
have any questions or need assistance with the process.
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
Pretty good Card Trick here?
- cardtrick.pps
- Are_you_a_professional.pps
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
Below is my report
Francisco Pinto-Leite
Enron Americas
1400 Smith Street, EB 3888
Houston, TX 77002-7361
Tel: 713-345-7942
Fax:713-646-3490
[email protected]
-----Original Message-----
From: Taylor, Mark E (Legal)
Sent: Tuesday, October 16, 2001 3:50 PM
To: Cook, Mary; Gray, Barbara N.; Greenberg, Mark; Hendry, Brent; Koehler, Anne C.; Leite, Francisco Pinto; Nelson, Cheryl; Sayre, Frank; Shackleton, Sara; Bailey, Susan; Boyd, Samantha; Heard, Marie; Jones, Tana; Panus, Stephanie
Subject: Work Reports
Please remember to get your work report updates to me by the end of the day.
Mark Taylor
Vice President and General Counsel
Enron Wholesale Services
1400 Smith Street - EB3892
Houston, Texas 77008
(713)853-7459
(713)646-3490 (fax)
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
---------------------- Forwarded by Chris Germany/HOU/ECT on 05/12/2000 01:16
PM ---------------------------
From: Colleen Sullivan 05/11/2000 11:04 AM
To: Chris Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dick Jenkins/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Scott Neal/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: CES Retail capacity
Per our discussion on Monday, we need to give CES-Retail a bid for the two
TCO transportation contracts that were dedicated to c&i customers that they
will no longer need once they sell their c&i business effective 6/1/00. As
you recall, one contract is to COH for 20,000/d through 10/31/00 (#65402);
the other is to BG&E for 19,000/d through 4/01(#65403). This is the
information that Jeff Porter and Charlie gave to me--you need to confirm that
this information is accurate.
I am going to call Charlie back tomorrow morning (Friday, 5/12) and suggest
that he talk to one of you two directly for a bid on the agreements. I think
this will be more efficient (and put the pressure on you to price it
up!!). If there is any problem with this, please let me know.
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
Attached please find a draft of the financial schedules prepared by Enron
Corp. Please call or email me if you have questions.
Mike McGown
<<Draft Financial Reps and Warranties>>
- Summer financials sent to V&E 8_2_00.doc
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
FYI:
Below is a message regarding the last (2) Cypress wires you gave me yesterday.
---------------------- Forwarded by Dana Davis/HOU/ECT on 01/31/2001 04:50 PM
---------------------------
Pat Johnson@ENRON
01/31/2001 04:28 PM
To: Dana Davis/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Fundings
Hi, Dana -
Craig Fox has the fundings you were looking for. I will fax you the cover
pages first thing tomorrow.
Pat
5-3369
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
No objections here.t we don't need. Tell Mark to proceed.Jeffrey C
Gossett/HOU/ECT@ECT
Thanks,
Errol
From: William Kelly @ ECT 01/31/2001 03:00 PM
To: Errol McLaughlin/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Jeffrey C Gossett/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: ERMS folder
Errol, any objections to Marks suggestion below?
WK
---------------------- Forwarded by William Kelly/HOU/ECT on 01/31/2001 02:57
PM ---------------------------
From: Mark Wolf/ENRON@enronXgate on 01/31/2001 02:23 PM
To: William Kelly/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: ERMS folder
The ERMS folder is out of disk space again. I managed to free up again 2 to
3gb about 2 weeks ago but we are back down to 450mb. I found a folder that I
would like to archive but I wanted to check with you first.
o:\erms\erms_adm\NYMEX\1999
I would like to archive about 6 or 7 months out of this folder. The oldest 7
are Jan, May, Feb, Mar, Apr, Jun, and Aug.
Otherwise I don't know what else to archive? I am open to suggestions.
Thanks
Mark Wolf
Storage Management Group
Phone (713) 345-6389
Pager (877) 242-3944
E-mail: [email protected]
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
---------------------- Forwarded by Phillip M Love/HOU/ECT on 07/14/2000
02:02 PM ---------------------------
Jim Little
07/14/2000 02:04 PM
To: Cathy Sprowls/HOU/ECT@ECT, Phillip M Love/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: 05/00 Central Synthetic Storage
I looked into these deal and I have good reason to believe they should have
been flashed by economics under CPR PIPELINE EXCHANGE. They will fall out as
a lone liquidation on the COMPARE REPORT, but only because CPR PIPELINE
EXCHANGE, while flashed on the desk is not included in the CPR detail for the
COMPARE REPORT. They should be offset by the flashed detail or they should
be put into the economics section as an adjustment to the desk.
From: Cathy Sprowls 07/14/2000 11:02 AM
To: Jim Little/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: 05/00 Central Synthetic Storage
Jim
I've identified the following deals that I believe are synthetic storage that
I will assign to Gas Accounting as reclasses to future months. Please let me
know if you disagree:
Panhandle Eastern NG9695.3 1,479,927.04 looks like turnaround on leg 1 in
08/2000
Northern Natural Gas NG4225.3 59,250.00 looks like turnaround on leg 1 in
07/2000
Northern Natural Gas NG6882.3 29,625.00 looks like turnaround on leg 1 in
07/2000
Northern Natural Gas NH0933.3 177,749.98 looks like turnaround on leg 1 in
09/2000
Northern Natural Gas NH7769.3 53,016.90 looks like turnaround on leg1 in
07/2000
Northern Natural Gas NI2881.3 29,625.00 turnaround leg 1 07/2000
Northern Natural Gas NI9625.3 88,874.99 turnaround leg 1 07/2000
Northern Natural Gas NJ1525.3 29,625.00 turnaround leg 1 07/2000
Northern Natural Gas NJ6166.3 29,625.00 turnaround leg 1 06/2000
Thanks for your help.
Cathy
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
[IMAGE]
A FREE seminar from Mobular Technologies and TMXinteractive!
It's no secret that permission email delivers the highest return on investment of practically any marketing medium, but now that everybody's doing it, how will you break through the noise? Enroll now for Pushing the Envelope, a completely FREE two-hour seminar that will teach you how to take your email and integrated online marketing efforts to the next level.
In this informative two-hour breakfast seminar, experienced industry leaders in permission marketing technology and practices will show you how some of today's top brands are pushing the envelope as they?
--- attain unprecedented response with rich media and rich data-powered email
--- expand the power and reach of email beyond simple "bulk" messaging
--- dramatically improve response rates, conversion rates, and average order sizes
--- use new tools to build brand affinity with each recipient, one at a time
There's absolutely no obligation, and all attendees will receive a FREE copy of Permission-Based E-Mail Marketing That Works! by Kim MacPherson - a $24.95 value!
Seats are Limited! Sign Up Now!
Register at Mobular's web site , or call Michele toll-free (in the US) at 866-MOBULAR x109. At each event, a complimentary continental breakfast will be served at 8:00 AM; the session will run from 8:30 to 10:30 AM. Don't miss it!
Oct. 9 - Irvine, Crowne Plaza, 949.863.1999 (more info )
Oct. 11- San Francisco, Westin St. Francis, 415.397.7000 (more info)
Oct. 16 - Chicago, Omni Ambassador East Hotel, 312.787.7200 (more info)
Oct. 18 - Dallas, Doubletree (at LBJ/Tollway), 972.934.8400 (more info)
Irvine
Tuesday, October 9, 8:30 - 10:30AM (Breakfast served at 8:00 AM)
Irvine Crowne Plaza
17941 Von Karman Ave.
Irvine, CA 92614
Phone: (949) 863-1999
Directions: San Diego Freeway (I-405): Exit MacArthur Blvd. North/East to Main St., take a Right to Gillette. The Crowne Plaza is on the North/East side of the 405 between Jamboree Road and MacArthur.
View map
(return to top)
San Francisco
Thursday, October 11, 8:30 - 10:30AM (Breakfast served at 8:00 AM)
Westin St. Francis
335 Powell Street
San Francisco, California 94102
Phone: (415) 397-7000
Directions: From I-280 exit Sixth Street, and go Northwest for 0.5 miles, continue on 6th St and go Northwest for 600 feet, turn right on Bryant St and go Northeast for 900 feet, turn left on 5th St and go Northwest for 0.8 miles, turn right on O'Farrell St and go East for 200 feet, turn left on Powell St. and go North for 500 feet
View Map
(return to top)
Chicago
Tuesday, October 16, 8:30 - 10:30AM (Breakfast served at 8:00 AM)
Omni Ambassador East
1301 North State Parkway
Chicago, Illinois 60610
Phone: (312) 787-7200
Directions: From I-94, exit at North Ave.; Turn Left (East); take North Ave. to State Pkwy; take a right on State Street; proceed four blocks to Goethe St., Turn Left; Hotel is located immediately on the left.
View Map
(return to top)
Dallas
Thursday, October 18, 8:30 - 10:30AM (Breakfast served at 8:00 AM)
Doubletree Hotel Dallas-Lincoln Centre near the Galleria
5410 LBJ Freeway
Dallas, TX 75240
Phone: (972) 934-8400
Directions: The Dallas Doubletree-Lincoln Centre is located southeast of the intersection of the LBJ Freeway (I-635) and the Dallas North Tollway, near the Galleria.
View Map
(return to top)
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
Jeff,
Thought you might appreciate this.
Kevin
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
-----Original Message-----
From: Meredith, Kevin
Sent: Monday, September 17, 2001 1:13 PM
To: Keavey, Peter F.
Cc: Lozano, Melba; Walker, Chris
Subject: HHub Elec
Pete,
Here is what the new Henry Hub swap would look like on the website. Prior to this going live, I will need to run it by Mark Taylor in Legal. Let me know what you think.
US Gas Daily HHub Elec Oct01 USD/MM
A financial Swap Transaction with Enron North America Corp., under which the Seller pays a Floating Price and the Buyer pays the price submitted by Counterparty on the Website (the Fixed Price) in each case in respect of the Notional Quantity per Determination Period. Each calendar month during the term of the Transaction will be a Determination Period. The Notional Quantity per Determination Period is the volume submitted multiplied by the number days in the relevant Determination Period. The Payment Date(s) will be 5 business days after the Floating Price is determinable. The Floating Price shall be the average of the Index for each day in the relevant Determination Period.
The term of the Transaction shall correspond to the date(s) set forth in the Product description on the Website.
The Index for a day shall be the price published on such calendar day under the heading "Electronic Trading Indices" in the Henry Hub section of Gas Daily, or if a calendar day is not a Business Day then the price used shall be the price published on the next succeeding Business Day.
The price is quoted in US Dollars per unit of volume, which will be the Contractual Currency.
The unit of measure against which the price is quoted shall be millions of British thermal units and the quantity shown shall be in millions of BTUs per day.
Kevin Meredith
EnronOnline
(713) 853-9555
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
Steve,
I can pick up the cost of your trip from the Research Group budget.
The more I think about it, the more I am convinced it would be difficult
to justify 2 trips per person. I think that we should go for one contiguous
stay per person and make a good
effort to make these trips productive.
Vince
Steven Leppard
05/11/2000 03:41 AM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Dale Surbey/LON/ECT@ECT
Subject: Summer visits
Vince
Thanks for offering to look my presentation over. The deadline for
submission has been extended until tomorrow (Friday), so there's less of a
hurry.
As regard our summer visits, we'll need to speak to Dale over the budget.
Personal commitments mean it's difficult for me to take two whole months to
visit, so if the cost is prohibitive I may need to make just one shorter
visit. I'd obviously like to spend longer, and two visits seems to be the
only way I can do it. I believe the situation is similar for Kirstee.
I've persuaded Richard to pay for Matt's visit in its entirety, and I've no
doubt that RAC/Credit Trading will pick up the bills for Ben and Kirstee.
It's difficult to think who'd be the natural group to pay for me. I honestly
think I'll have difficulty persuading, e.g. Richard, that it's worth his
while to pay for my visit. I get the impression he thinks I'm doing OK
without the need to go to Houston for further training.
I'm interviewing a candidate for Bjorn's model review role during today's
videoconference, so we'll need to speak beforehand or perhaps Friday.
All the best,
Steve
Vince J Kaminski
05/10/2000 01:54 PM
To: Steven Leppard/LON/ECT@ECT
cc: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stinson Gibner/HOU/ECT@ECT, Grant
Masson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Pinnamaneni Krishnarao/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Conference
Steve,
I am tied up at the Power2000 conference.
I shall get back to you with my comments on Thursday morning.
I also want to talk to you tomorrow about finalizing the dates of the summer
rotations. We are talking to HR here about apartments, car rentals,
and other arrangements for the London team for the summer. I promised
to give them the names and dates by the end of the week.
Sorry for the delay in sending you my comments.
Vince
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
FYI
-----Original Message-----
From: Fossum, Drew
Sent: Friday, November 09, 2001 1:09 PM
To: Hayslett, Rod
Cc: Howard, Kevin A.; Porter, Gregory J.
Subject: RE:
I'll ask Greg to verify that the contract list includes these agreements. Also, Kevin or Greg, do these agreements (standard trading counterparty brokerage agreements) constitute "lock box accounts" that we need to disclose under schedule 4.01(v)?
-----Original Message-----
From: Hayslett, Rod
Sent: Friday, November 09, 2001 12:48 PM
To: Fossum, Drew
Subject:
Brokerage accounts. Do you have copies of the agreements? Both TW and NNG.
--------------------------
Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld (www.BlackBerry.net)
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
We don't have revised versions yet. when we do, we will probably only want
to put some (not all) of the documents on the intranet.
Gavin Dillingham@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
08/24/2000 02:06 PM
To: Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: RE: Luntz Focus Groups (1 of 4)
Have we received the newly revised principles, facts and statements for the
Luntz Focus Groups? I was hoping to place these on the California power issue
database.
Thanks,
Gavin
---------------------- Forwarded by Gavin Dillingham/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on
08/24/2000 02:05 PM ---------------------------
Elizabeth Linnell@ENRON
08/21/2000 12:41 PM
Sent by: Elizabeth Linnell@ENRON
To: Gavin Dillingham/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc:
Subject: RE: Luntz Focus Groups (1 of 4)
---------------------- Forwarded by Elizabeth Linnell/NA/Enron on 08/21/2000
12:41 PM ---------------------------
Maureen McVicker
08/21/2000 11:43 AM
To: Jeff Dasovich/SFO/EES@EES, Elizabeth Linnell/NA/Enron@Enron, Mark
Palmer/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Richard Shapiro/HOU/EES@EES, James D
Steffes/HOU/EES@EES
cc:
Subject: RE: Luntz Focus Groups (1 of 4)
---------------------- Forwarded by Maureen McVicker/NA/Enron on 08/21/2000
11:41 AM ---------------------------
"Elizabeth A. VanDersarl" <[email protected]> on 08/21/2000 09:11:34 AM
To: "'[email protected]'" <[email protected]>
cc:
Subject: RE: Luntz Focus Groups (1 of 4)
Hi Steven,
Attached is the first of four documents that we have prepared for
the focus groups. All of the exercises are works in progress and I am
sending them to you for comments. (Hopefully, we are on the right track.)
As we discussed, I am happy to fly down to Houston tomorrow so that we can
review these materials together. If, however, you feel that we can edit the
exercises via email that's fine too. Just let me know which arrangement
makes you the most sense to you. Hope all is well.
Regards,
Liz
<<anti regulation speech.doc>> An anti-dereg speech is in the works.
- anti regulation speech.doc
---------------------- Forwarded by Elizabeth Linnell/NA/Enron on 08/21/2000
12:41 PM ---------------------------
Maureen McVicker
08/21/2000 11:43 AM
To: Jeff Dasovich/SFO/EES@EES, Elizabeth Linnell/NA/Enron@Enron, Mark
Palmer/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Richard Shapiro/HOU/EES@EES, James D
Steffes/HOU/EES@EES
cc:
Subject: RE: Luntz Focus Groups (2 of 4)
---------------------- Forwarded by Maureen McVicker/NA/Enron on 08/21/2000
11:43 AM ---------------------------
"Elizabeth A. VanDersarl" <[email protected]> on 08/21/2000 09:15:16 AM
To: "'[email protected]'" <[email protected]>
cc:
Subject: RE: Luntz Focus Groups (2 of 4)
Attached please find a sheet of facts regarding deregulation.
<<Facts 2.doc>>
- Facts 2.doc
---------------------- Forwarded by Elizabeth Linnell/NA/Enron on 08/21/2000
12:41 PM ---------------------------
Maureen McVicker
08/21/2000 11:43 AM
To: Jeff Dasovich/SFO/EES@EES, Elizabeth Linnell/NA/Enron@Enron, Mark
Palmer/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Richard Shapiro/HOU/EES@EES, James D
Steffes/HOU/EES@EES
cc:
Subject: RE: Luntz Focus Groups (3 of 4)
---------------------- Forwarded by Maureen McVicker/NA/Enron on 08/21/2000
11:43 AM ---------------------------
"Elizabeth A. VanDersarl" <[email protected]> on 08/21/2000 09:18:16 AM
To: "'[email protected]'" <[email protected]>
cc:
Subject: RE: Luntz Focus Groups (3 of 4)
Attached please find a sheet of principles. We would like your suggestions
for 3 or 4 more.
<<Principles 2.doc>>
- Principles 2.doc
---------------------- Forwarded by Elizabeth Linnell/NA/Enron on 08/21/2000
12:41 PM ---------------------------
Maureen McVicker
08/21/2000 11:44 AM
To: Jeff Dasovich/SFO/EES@EES, Elizabeth Linnell/NA/Enron@Enron, Mark
Palmer/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Richard Shapiro/HOU/EES@EES, James D
Steffes/HOU/EES@EES
cc:
Subject: RE: Luntz Focus Groups (4 of 4)
---------------------- Forwarded by Maureen McVicker/NA/Enron on 08/21/2000
11:43 AM ---------------------------
"Elizabeth A. VanDersarl" <[email protected]> on 08/21/2000 09:19:26 AM
To: "'[email protected]'" <[email protected]>
cc:
Subject: RE: Luntz Focus Groups (4 of 4)
Attached please find a sheet of pro and con statements.
<<Statements.doc>>
- Statements.doc
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
I forgot to copy you ...
---------------------- Forwarded by Alan Comnes/PDX/ECT on 03/20/2001 10:00
PM ---------------------------
Alan Comnes
03/20/2001 09:54 PM
To: Tim Belden/HOU/ECT@ECT, Christian Yoder/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeff
Richter/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert Badeer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Steve C Hall/PDX/ECT@ECT,
Bill Williams III/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc: Susan J Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON, Joe Hartsoe/Corp/Enron@ENRON
Subject: FERC Staff market mitigation comments for California--Comments of
Enron--DUE WEDNESDAY
To West Desk Traders in Cali:
On Thursday 3/22, FERC will accept comments on its staff's plan to provide
market mitigation to California ISO markets. A summary of the report is
copied below.
Enron GA plans to file a motion that will support the comments of EPSA and
WPTF and supplement the comments as noted below.
EPSA's comments are generally supportive of the staff report but recommends
that FERC:
clarify that staff's market mitigation measures are being put into place to
address structural defects in the California market, not the abuse of market
power by any market participants;
avoid the use of cost-based rates as a proxy for competitive prices during
times of scarcity;
ensure that if cost-based proxy rates are used, those rates includes the full
value of scarcity, capacity, opportunity costs, and other factors;
develop proxy rates, if necessary, using the formula in the March 9th Refund
Order RATHER THAN the unit specific marginal costs identified in the order;
and
forego forced bidding into real-time markets.
WPTF will make similar comments (generally with more color and vehemence) and
will also raise how lack of creditworthiness will affect price.
I also recommend we supplement the EPSA/WPTF comments with some additional
comments on energy-limited resources, see attached.
Please prove Sue Mara or I with your comments by COB Wednesday.
Thank you,
Alan Comnes
Report Summary (from EPSA)
Stressing that the proposal is designed to apply only to approximately five
percent of the market that remains in real-time and not to the bilateral and
forward markets, the Report immediately notes that "ultimately the real
solution to California's problems lies in increased investments in
infrastructure."
The Report recommends that the California ISO conduct a real-time auction
with associated measures to mitigate the impact of physical and economic
withholding and significant exercises of market power during periods of
scarcity:
(1) Coordinating and Controlling Outages - The ISO should coordinate and
approve all planned outages by units that have a Participating Generator
Agreement (PGA) with the ISO. Coordination and outage control procedures
should then be coupled with reporting requirements to FERC and dispute review
should be expedited. Similarly, the ISO should closely monitor unplanned
outages and report questionable outages to FERC for further investigation.
(2) Selling Obligations - All capacity that is available and not scheduled to
run under sellers with PGAs should be offered in the real-time market - this
obligation would not be imposed on bilateral markets of the ISO day-ahead
markets. PGA generators would have to submit to FERC a dependable capacity
for each unit in addition to other operating parameters necessary to
calculate marginal costs, such as heat rate. FERC Staff would then use this
data, in combination with published fuel costs and emission credit data to
determine a price that the ISO would use pre-determined to mitigate prices
during times of reserve deficiency. Load Serving Entities should also be
required to name their curtailment price and to identify which loads will be
curtailed.
(3) Price Mitigation - When called upon to provide the available and
unscheduled capacity as mentioned above, PGA unit prices would be mitigated
in hours when there is a reserve deficiency, or Stage 3 emergencies (the
Report notes that it is "these hours which are extremely conducive to the
exercise of market power by suppliers") and will be obligated to sell
capacity in real-time at the marginal cost of the highest-priced PGA until
called upon to run.
(4) Real-time Price Mitigation for Each Generating Unit - all generating
units should have a standing, confidential price based on its marginal
costs. This price will be used by the ISO to establish the real-time market
clearing price when mitigation is appropriate. Staff believes that a single
market clearing price auction design is appropriate, thus reversing the
recommendation to use an as bid design in the December Order.
(5) Market Clearing Price - All real-time energy offers should be paid the
applicable market clearing price.
(6) Conditions for Invoking Mitigation - Mitigation measures should only be
applied to critical operating periods, such as emergencies.
As noted in the Report, Staff recognizes that there are potential
difficulties in implementing the proposal, and that "there are no easy
answers to the current problems in the California market." Among the
purported difficulties, Staff notes implementation problems with bidding
obligations on imported power, incentive effects on load scheduling,
treatment of purchased power, mitigating prices during emergencies, and
setting a price component for scarcity.
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
Colleagues:
EES positions as of 1st of April 2001 are no available at the following level
of details:
The position (long, short, and net) in electric utility "x"
The position (long, short, and net) per customer in the electric utility "x".
The position (long, short, and net) per rate schedule/customer class in
electric utility "x".
Aggregates of the above per State, NERC Region, and Customer.
If you need any position for a specific utility in your service territory,
please contact Miyung Buster ((713-853-4329) by email with cc to: Amr Ibrahim
and we shall attempt to provide the data in the shortest possible time
(currently aiming at within the same business day). Additional names for
contact will be added very soon, hopefully, to shorten the reply time and
increase data reliability.
Best regards
AI
713-853-3037
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
It should reference the EOL number. It looks af if Kevin did not link it
up. I'll remind him.
DG
Dawn C Kenne
10/17/2000 09:08 AM
To: Darron C Giron/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: EMW-IM Midwest
Darron,
When you are manually entering the EMW deals into tagg, are you referencing
the EOL number?
I was looking at the tagg deal you gave me last Friday (Q40121) and it does
not reference it. Should it? Or, because it is funky, does it not have to?
Dawn
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
[IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE][IMAGE]Dear Super Saver, Here's another great offer from Eversave. Enjoy! [IMAGE][IMAGE][IMAGE]
[IMAGE] [IMAGE] Dear Super Saver, Saving Just Got Easier! Eversave.com is FREE and saves you valuable time and money every week! Our valued members receive weekly email announcements of valuable discounts tailored to their specific interests from the local stores they know and trust! Start saving today! It's easy and it's FREE ! Take advantage of savings from your favorite stores: Marshalls [IMAGE]Sears Office Depot Target Dunkin Donuts Pizza Hut Warner Brothers TJ Maxx and many more... Click HERE now and start saving! This service is just one more way that Eversave.com delivers savings and convenience. Enjoy! Your friends at Eversave.com
Eversave.com Software and Local Offers for #name#! My Shopping Preferences - To update your Shopping Preferences, click here . My Local Savings - To see all YOUR local savings, click here . Preferred Partners - To visit our preferred partners, click here . Hard To Find Stuff - To request quotes for hard to find services and products in your area, click here . Complimentary Software - To receive software, complements of Eversave, click here ! Copyright2001 Eversave.com. All Rights Reserved.
You have received this email because you or someone using your email address agreed to receive special offers from Enterprise Marketing Solutions, Inc. and its marketing partners. If you wish to be excluded from future EMSi offers from this advertiser, please click here to send us an email message. Please do not reply to this message as it was sent from an unattended mailbox.
If you would like more information on our privacy policy, please read our privacy statement .
This special offer is brought to you by: 1 Free Prize
PRIVACY NOTE: We are committed to respecting your privacy and originally obtained your email address from any of the following means: Registration for a third party product or service, through a web form or other permission-based marketing activity. If you have received this message in error, or you wish to be removed from our list, please reply to this email with REMOVE in the Subject or click here .
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
Stan,
I talked to the folks in the field regarding this and it turns out the issues were not with TW but, in fact, with Northern. The Amarillo team will address it with them. I knew we had no issues with Oneok nor did we have capacity available as referenced. Plus, we have very good communications with the TW field operations employees.
-----Original Message-----
From: Horton, Stanley
Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2002 6:08 PM
To: Harris, Steven
Subject: FW: Follow Up - Amarillo Meeting
Can you follow up on this.
-----Original Message-----
From: Vaughn, Ann
Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2002 9:02 AM
To: Horton, Stanley
Subject: Follow Up - Amarillo Meeting
Stan................just a reminder to follow up with the commercial group regarding the question about gas going off the system. While we have capacity, the field doesn't see much happening to bring customers back or to get new customers. There was also the issue of better communication between the commercial group and the field. They specifically mentioned a situation with ONEOK. The customer told the field employees that ETS was releasing gas to them, not our commercial group.
Again...............you did an outstanding job yesterday.
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 04/25/2001 01:20 PM -----
"Julee Malinowski-Ball" <[email protected]>
04/25/2001 01:08 PM
Please respond to "Julee Malinowski-Ball"
To: "Susan McCabe" <[email protected]>, "Scott Govenar"
<[email protected]>, "Ron Tom" <[email protected]>, "Robert Ross"
<[email protected]>, "Rina Venturini" <[email protected]>, "Phil Isenberg"
<[email protected]>, "Mike Monagan" <[email protected]>, "Maureen OHaren"
<[email protected]>, "Marie Moretti" <[email protected]>,
"Kassandra Gough" <[email protected]>, "Jamie Parker" <[email protected]>,
"Hedy Govenar" <[email protected]>, "Fred Pownall"
<[email protected]>, "Delany Hunter" <[email protected]>, "Chuck Cole"
<[email protected]>, "Bev Hansen" <[email protected]>, "Anne Kelly"
<[email protected]>, "Mark Nobili" <[email protected]>
cc: "Sue Mara" <[email protected]>, "Steve Ponder" <[email protected]>,
"Stephanie Newell" <[email protected]>, "Sandi McCubbin"
<[email protected]>, "Roger Pelote" <[email protected]>, "Richard
Hyde" <[email protected]>, "Rachel King" <[email protected]>,
"Paula Soos" <[email protected]>, "Lynn Lednicky"
<[email protected]>, "Larrea, John" <[email protected]>, "kent
Palmerton" <[email protected]>, "Kassandra Gough"
<[email protected]>, "John Stout" <[email protected]>, "Joe
Ronan" <[email protected]>, "Jeff Dasovich" <[email protected]>, "Jean
Munoz" <[email protected]>, "Jack Pigott" <[email protected]>, "Greg
Blue" <[email protected]>, "Scott Sadler" <[email protected]>, "Jan Smutny
Jones" <[email protected]>, "Steven Kelley" <[email protected]>, "Katie Kaplan"
<[email protected]>
Subject: AB 60x to be heard Tues.
Heard from Lawrence this morning who said AB 60x (Hertzberg) is likely to be
heard in the Senate Energy Committee on Tuesday next week. He said the
committee at this time is fairly neutral on the bill since he doesn't see
that it does anything. He understands our problems with the bill, but
suggested we may want to recommend a solution. IEP will be meeting with him
this afternoon to give him the problem at the 50,000 foot level. Individual
companies may want to give him the specifics.
Where are we with our meetings with members of the committee?
IEP met with Kip in Sher's office who was noncommittal, but agreed with our
arguments against the bill. IEP's meeting with Alarcon was cancelled. We
are trying to reschedule. Since this is a special session bill, Dunn and
Poochigian will be voting on the bill.
Julee Malinowski-Ball
Senior Associate
Edson + Modisette
916-552-7070
FAX-552-7075
[email protected]
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
Dear Alumni,
ZBT's main focus for this school year is to reconnect with our alumni. We
will be e-mailing you periodically about events you might be interested in
attending throughout the school year. If you know of any other alumni who
aren't receiving our e-mails, conatct us and we'll add their names to our
e-mail data base.
Thanks,
Jerone Tyler
web-master (ZBT)
ZBT to host Benefit Concert
We, the Brothers of Zeta Beta Tau, members of the Monmouth College community
wish to, in an entertaining manner, give back to the community that has thus
far supported us so well. In order to accomplish this, the Brothers of ZBT
will host a Benefit Concert which will provide excellent entertainment for
the entire community while raising money for an important local
organization, Jamieson Center.
The Jamieson Community Center is a private, non-profit human service agency
that caters to the needs of the residents of Warren and Henderson Counties
of Illinois. Present services offered by the Jamieson Community Center
include a Thrift Shop, emergency food pantry, emergency services, Christmas
Store and Christmas Baskets, childhood immunizations, SHARE Food Program,
meals for seniors, summer feeding services for children, Women Infants and
Children, domestic violence counseling, and much more. Jamieson Center
provides thousands of instances of assistance each year to persons of all
ages with a variety of needs.
On November 10th Zeta Beta Tau will be holding the philanthropic event for
the Jamieson Community Center. The ZBT Benefit Concert will be a
combination of musical performances by members of the Zeta Beta Tau
Fraternity, students and faculty members of Monmouth College. To reserve
tickets, please call Andrew Rubia at (309) 457-3069. Donations for Jamieson
Center will be accepted c/o Zeta Beta Tau at 318 N. 9th St., #491, Monmouth,
Illinois, 61462. As stated before all proceeds will go to the Jamieson
Community Center. The show is sure to be a great event!
check out our own ZBT web-site at:
http://department.monm.edu/zbt/default.htm
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
Don't forget that Global Finance is supposed to review these. They have the
turbine contract.
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
The report named: West VaR <http://trv.corp.enron.com/linkFromExcel.asp?report_cd=36&report_name=West+VaR&category_cd=2&category_name=WEST&toc_hide=1&sTV1=2&TV1Exp=Y¤t_efct_date=11/26/2001>, published as of 11/26/2001 is now available for viewing on the website.
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
fyi
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 09/12/2000 11:51
AM ---------------------------
"Duncan, Allyson" <[email protected]> on 09/12/2000 11:42:43 AM
To: "'Mann Kay'" <[email protected]>, "'Chapman Tom'"
<[email protected]>, "'Keenan Jeffrey'" <[email protected]>,
"'[email protected]'" <[email protected]>, "'Kroll
Heather'" <[email protected]>
cc: "Fine, Jonathan" <[email protected]>
Subject: Amended Application
<<HBTX01_.doc>> I would like to file this as soon as possible, but would
appreciate your taking a look at it to make sure we captured all the
changes. Thanks.
- HBTX01_.doc
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
Jeff Dasovich,
As far as I'm concerned, you are the "Outsider" to a Thursday team (#9).
You need not bother attending Thursday's section if that is inconvenient
for you.
The paper is due on the day of the lecture the team is listed under.
--Tom McCullough
At 01:30 PM 4/11/00 -0500, you wrote:
>Professor McCullough:
>Due to the fact that I took three classes during the last 8 week module,
>I'm signed up with a group that's in the Thursday class (which I thought
>I'd be attending this 8 weeks). Therefore, what I propose to do, for
>simplicity (and due dates), is to attend Thursday's class beginning this
>Thursday. That way there will be no mix-ups with respect to when team
>assignments ought to be turned in. I hope this works. Thanks so much.
>
>Best,
>Jeff
=======================================================================
Tom McCullough
Senior Lecturer
Haas School of Business
University of California at Berkeley
==========================================================================
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
* * * * * Information Break * * * * *
If you missed this popular presentation last year, here is your chance to see
it this year.
Global Trends: 2000 to 2050
Speaker:
Amy Oberg
Manager, Competitive Intelligence and Future Foresight
Enron Energy Services
Six trends to be discussed:
More Young, More Old
What Time is it Anyway?
Masterful Manipulators
Water, Water Everywhere?
Energy Ain't What It Used to Be
In a State of Fusion
When: Wednesday, Feb. 16, 2000, 11:30 a.m. to 12:30 p.m.
Where: EB5C2
To make a reservation, call 3-1941 and select option 1.
(Lunch will not be provided, but you are welcome to bring your own.)
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
Hi All,
Luke Tatsu Johnson arrived at 3:26 AM on 2/5. Tatsu is Japanese for dragon -
2000 is the year of the dragon. He weighed in at 9 lbs. 14.5 oz. Mom and
Luke
are doing great!! Talk to you soon.
Proud Papa,
TJ
- Mama'sLap.JPG
- LukeNursery2.JPG
- Father&Son.JPG
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
Ben, why are we distributing this?
It is inaccurate and I'm not sure I want it floating around the place.
Regards
Delainey
---------------------- Forwarded by David W Delainey/HOU/ECT on 05/26/2000
08:37 PM ---------------------------
Enron North America Corp.
From: Benjamin Thomason 05/26/2000 02:12 PM
To: Christopher F Calger/PDX/ECT@ECT, David Parquet/SF/ECT@ECT, Jake
Thomas/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ed Clark/PDX/ECT@ECT, Jim Gilbert/PDX/ECT@ECT, Dean
Russell/SF/ECT@ECT, David Kates/SF/ECT@ECT, Michael McDonald/SF/ECT@ECT,
Laird Dyer/SF/ECT@ECT, Samuel Wehn/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rob Bakondy/SF/ECT@ECT, Mark
Fillinger/HOU/EES@EES, Janet R Dietrich/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ben Jacoby/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Mike J Miller/HOU/ECT@ECT, Laura Luce/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brian D
Barto/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Brett R Wiggs/SA/Enron@Enron,
Tammy R Shepperd/HOU/ECT@ECT, Cassandra
Schultz/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Jody Pierce/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dan
Badger/LON/ECT@ECT, Sheila Tweed/HOU/ECT@ECT, Roger Ondreko/HOU/ECT@ECT,
David Leboe/HOU/ECT@ECT, Raymond Bowen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Andrew
Kelemen/HOU/ECT@ECT, David W Delainey/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron,
Lisa Bills/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Carl Tricoli/Corp/Enron@Enron, Thomas M
Suffield/Corp/Enron@ENRON, James A
Hughes/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Fred L
Kelly/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Dick
Westfahl/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Dan
Shultz/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Benjamin Thomason/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Ron Coker/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: Master Turbine List
Attached is a master turbine list compiled by CTG of Enron North America. We
have created this list by compiling information from various developers, and
from accounting and legal groups. We will be circulating this list monthly.
Please notify us of any needed updates or changes to the master turbine list
as well as changes to the circulation list.
Thank you,
Ben Thomason
CTG Contacts:
Ron Coker (713) 345-8992
Ben Thomason (713) 345-8802
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.