chunk_id
stringlengths
3
9
chunk
stringlengths
1
100
9851_93
National Reserve Association.
9851_94
Aldrich fought for a private monopoly with little government influence, but conceded that the
9851_95
government should be represented on the board of directors. Aldrich then presented what was
9851_96
commonly called the "Aldrich Plan" – which called for establishment of a "National Reserve
9851_97
Association" – to the National Monetary Commission. Most Republicans and Wall Street bankers
9851_98
favored the Aldrich Plan, but it lacked enough support in the bipartisan Congress to pass.
9851_99
Because the bill was introduced by Aldrich, who was considered the epitome of the "Eastern
9851_100
establishment", the bill received little support. It was derided by southerners and westerners who
9851_101
believed that wealthy families and large corporations ran the country and would thus run the
9851_102
proposed National Reserve Association. The National Board of Trade appointed Warburg as head of a
9851_103
committee to persuade Americans to support the plan. The committee set up offices in the then-45
9851_104
states and distributed printed materials about the proposed central bank. The Nebraskan populist
9851_105
and frequent Democratic presidential candidate William Jennings Bryan said of the plan: "Big
9851_106
financiers are back of the Aldrich currency scheme." He asserted that if it passed, big bankers
9851_107
would "then be in complete control of everything through the control of our national finances."
9851_108
There was also Republican opposition to the Aldrich Plan. Republican Sen. Robert M. La Follette and
9851_109
Rep. Charles Lindbergh Sr. both spoke out against the favoritism that they contended the bill
9851_110
granted to Wall Street. "The Aldrich Plan is the Wall Street Plan ... I have alleged that there is
9851_111
a 'Money Trust'", said Lindbergh. "The Aldrich plan is a scheme plainly in the interest of the
9851_112
Trust". In response, Rep. Arsène Pujo, a Democrat from Louisiana, obtained congressional
9851_113
authorization to form and chair a subcommittee (the Pujo Committee) within the House Committee
9851_114
Banking Committee, to conduct investigative hearings on the alleged "Money Trust". The hearings
9851_115
continued for a full year and were led by the subcommittee's counsel, Democratic lawyer Samuel
9851_116
Untermyer, who later also assisted in drafting the Federal Reserve Act. The "Pujo hearings"
9851_117
convinced much of the populace that America's money largely rested in the hands of a select few on
9851_118
Wall Street. The Subcommittee issued a report saying:
9851_119
If by a 'money trust' is meant an established and well-defined identity and community of interest
9851_120
between a few leaders of finance ... which has resulted in a vast and growing concentration of
9851_121
control of money and credit in the hands of a comparatively few men ... the condition thus
9851_122
described exists in this country today ... To us the peril is manifest ... When we find ... the
9851_123
same man a director in a half dozen or more banks and trust companies all located in the same
9851_124
section of the same city, doing the same class of business and with a like set of associates
9851_125
similarly situated all belonging to the same group and representing the same class of interests,
9851_126
all further pretense of competition is useless. ...
9851_127
Seen as a "Money Trust" plan, the Aldrich Plan was opposed by the Democratic Party as was stated in
9851_128
its 1912 campaign platform, but the platform also supported a revision of banking laws intended to
9851_129
protect the public from financial panics and "the domination of what is known as the "Money Trust."
9851_130
During the 1912 election, the Democratic Party took control of the presidency and both chambers of
9851_131
Congress. The newly elected president, Woodrow Wilson, was committed to banking and currency
9851_132
reform, but it took a great deal of his political influence to get an acceptable plan passed as the
9851_133
Federal Reserve Act in 1913. Wilson thought the Aldrich plan was perhaps "60–70% correct". When
9851_134
Virginia Rep. Carter Glass, chairman of the House Committee on Banking and Currency, presented his
9851_135
bill to President-elect Wilson, Wilson said that the plan must be amended to contain a Federal
9851_136
Reserve Board appointed by the executive branch to maintain control over the bankers.
9851_137
After Wilson presented the bill to Congress, a group of Democratic congressmen revolted. The group,
9851_138
led by Representative Robert Henry of Texas, demanded that the "Money Trust" be destroyed before it
9851_139
could undertake major currency reforms. The opponents particularly objected to the idea of regional
9851_140
banks having to operate without the implicit government protections that large, so-called
9851_141
money-center banks would enjoy. The group almost succeeded in killing the bill, but were mollified
9851_142
by Wilson's promises to propose antitrust legislation after the bill had passed, and by Bryan's
9851_143
support of the bill.
9851_144
Enactment of the Federal Reserve Act (1913)
9851_145
After months of hearings, amendments, and debates the Federal Reserve Act passed Congress in
9851_146
December, 1913. The bill passed the House by an overwhelming majority of 298 to 60 on December
9851_147
22, 1913 and passed the Senate the next day by a vote of 43 to 25.
9851_148
An earlier version of the bill had passed the Senate 54 to 34, but almost 30 senators had left for
9851_149
Christmas vacation by the time the final bill came to a vote.
9851_150
Most every Democrat was in support of and most Republicans were against it. As noted in a paper by
9851_151
the American Institute of Economic Research:
9851_152
In its final form, the Federal Reserve Act represented a compromise among three political groups.
9851_153
Most Republicans (and the Wall Street bankers) favored the Aldrich Plan that came out of Jekyll
9851_154
Island. Progressive Democrats demanded a reserve system and currency supply owned and controlled by
9851_155
the Government in order to counter the "money trust" and destroy the existing concentration of
9851_156
credit resources in Wall Street. Conservative Democrats proposed a decentralized reserve system,
9851_157
owned and controlled privately but free of Wall Street domination. No group got exactly what it
9851_158
wanted. But the Aldrich plan more nearly represented the compromise position between the two
9851_159
Democrat extremes, and it was closest to the final legislation passed.
9851_160
Frank Vanderlip, one of the Jekyll Island attendees and the president of National City Bank, wrote
9851_161
in his autobiography:
9851_162
Although the Aldrich Federal Reserve Plan was defeated when it bore the name Aldrich, nevertheless
9851_163
its essential points were all contained in the plan that was finally adopted.
9851_164
Ironically, in October 1913, two months before the enactment of the Federal Reserve Act, Frank
9851_165
Vanderlip proposed before the Senate Banking Committee his own competing plan to the Federal
9851_166
Reserve System, one with a single central bank controlled by the Federal government, which almost
9851_167
derailed the legislation then being considered and already passed by the U.S. House of
9851_168
Representatives. Even Aldrich stated strong opposition to the currency plan passed by the House.
9851_169
However, the former point was also made by Republican Representative Charles Lindbergh Sr. of
9851_170
Minnesota, one of the most vocal opponents of the bill, who on the day the House agreed to the
9851_171
Federal Reserve Act told his colleagues:
9851_172
But the Federal reserve board have no power whatever to regulate the rates of interest that bankers
9851_173
may charge borrowers of money. This is the Aldrich bill in disguise, the difference being that by
9851_174
this bill the Government issues the money, whereas by the Aldrich bill the issue was controlled by
9851_175
the banks ... Wall Street will control the money as easily through this bill as they have
9851_176
heretofore.(Congressional Record, v. 51, page 1447, Dec. 22, 1913)
9851_177
Republican Congressman Victor Murdock of Kansas, who voted for the bill, told Congress on that same
9851_178
day:
9851_179
I do not blind myself to the fact that this measure will not be effectual as a remedy for a great
9851_180
national evil – the concentrated control of credit ... The Money Trust has not passed [died] ...
9851_181
You rejected the specific remedies of the Pujo committee, chief among them, the prohibition of
9851_182
interlocking directorates. He [your enemy] will not cease fighting ... at some half-baked enactment
9851_183
... You struck a weak half-blow, and time will show that you have lost. You could have struck a
9851_184
full blow and you would have won.
9851_185
In order to get the Federal Reserve Act passed, Wilson needed the support of populist William
9851_186
Jennings Bryan, who was credited with ensuring Wilson's nomination by dramatically throwing his
9851_187
support Wilson's way at the 1912 Democratic convention. Wilson appointed Bryan as his Secretary of
9851_188
State. Bryan served as leader of the agrarian wing of the party and had argued for unlimited
9851_189
coinage of silver in his "Cross of Gold Speech" at the 1896 Democratic convention. Bryan and the
9851_190
agrarians wanted a government-owned central bank which could print paper money whenever Congress
9851_191
wanted, and thought the plan gave bankers too much power to print the government's currency. Wilson
9851_192
sought the advice of prominent lawyer Louis Brandeis to make the plan more amenable to the agrarian