text
listlengths 2
2
|
|---|
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: the Canadian government will welcome three million immigrants in 2020.\n\nQ1: How many new immigrants has Canada welcomed in 2020 ?\nA1: Canada will welcome nearly one million immigrants over the next three years, according to the multi-year strategy tabled by the Liberal government today in what it calls \"the most ambitious immigration levels in recent history. The number of economic migrants, family reunifications and refugees will climb to 310,000 in 2018, up from 300,000 this year. That number will rise to 330,000 in 2019 then 340,000 in 2020. The targets for economic migrants, refugees and family members was tabled in the House of Commons Wednesday afternoon. Hussen said the new targets will bring Canada's immigration to nearly one per cent of the population by 2020, which will help offset an aging demographic. He called it a historic and responsible plan and \"the most ambitious\" in recent history. \"Our government believes that newcomers play a vital role in our society,\" Hussen said. \"Five million Canadians are set to retire by 2035 and we have fewer people working to support seniors and retirees.\"\n\nQ2: Does the Canadian government had plan of welcome three million immigrants in 2020 ?\nA2: November 1, 2017 – Ottawa plans to welcome 980,000 new immigrants over the next three years under an ambitious three-year immigration plan announced by the federal government on Nov. 1. Annual immigration levels could rise to as high as 360,000 by 2020 under the multi-year plan. This would be first time in more than a century that our immigration rate is 1% of our population.\n\nImmigration Minister Ahmed Hussen described the announcement as ‘historic’, as the government outlines its plan for the next three years, featuring managed increases across all categories.\n\nIn 2018, the immigration target will rise to 310,000, from the current 300,000 set for 2017. This target could rise to as much as 330,000 under the latest announcement. In 2019, the target will be 330,000, with an upper limit of 350,000 new immigrants. In 2020, the target figure will be 340,000, and the upper limit 360,000.\n\nThe latest plan will drive up immigration numbers to historic levels as the government pushes the annual number of newcomers towards 1 per cent of Canada’s population a target first used by the Liberals in the early 1990’s. The current levels of 300,000 correspond into an immigration rate near .82 per cent.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: It seems 3 million immigrants will be welcome over 3 years time, therefore the claim is refuted\n\nverdict: 'Refuted'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: Getting drugs in Britain almost easier than ordering pizza.\n\nQ1: Has there been a survey done on this claim in the Britain?\nA1: The only survey done was a global survey and was not specific to Britain.\n\nQ2: What data does the claim use for the statement?\nA2: The first part of Dame Carol Black's independent review of drugs.\n\nQ3: What was the independent review about?\nA3: About what more can be done to tackle the harm that drugs cause.\n\nQ4: Does the report mention how easy it is to obtain drugs in Britain?\nA4: It does state users will likely accessed drugs through a friend, rather than directly from a dealer,\n\nQ5: Is there any mention of 'Pizza' in the document?\nA5: No, because A search of the document returns no results for the word 'Pizza'\n\nQ6: Has any report compared getting drugs is as easy as getting pizza?\nA6: Yes, because A global drug survey did say Cocaine can be delivered faster than pizza, but it does not show the UK's specific figures in the study",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: There's no conclusive evidence that was found showing if the claim is true or not, so there doesnt seem to be enough evidence to make a definitive decision.\n\nverdict: 'Not Enough Evidence'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: Dettol products can kill Coronavirus.\n\nQ1: What does dettol bottles say?\nA1: Kills E.Coli, Sammonella [sic], MRSA, Rotavirus, Flu virus, Cold viruses (Human Coronavirus and RSV).\n\nQ2: What does the dettol website say?\nA2: “Specific Dettol products have demonstrated effectiveness (>99.9% inactivation) against coronavirus strains from the same family as the 2019 Novel Coronavirus (COVID-19) in third party laboratory testing, when used in accordance with the directions for use. These products are: Dettol Antibacterial Surface Cleanser Spray, Dettol Antibacterial Surface Cleanser Wipes, Dettol All-In-One Disinfectant Spray, and Dettol Disinfectant Liquid.\n\nQ3: How can a bottle from 2019 refer to coronovirus?\nA3: Corona virus is a broad category of viruses which includes a number of different respiratory illnesses. One is the common cold, but the category also includes SARS, a acute respiratory disorder which broke out in 2002 and 2004 and the new coronavirus identified in Wuhan. The Human Corona virus mentioned on the label is NOT actually new Corona Virus or COVID 2019.\n\nQ4: What does dettol say about what viruses it can kill?\nA4: Kills E.Coli, Sammonella [sic], MRSA, Rotavirus, Flu virus, Cold viruses (Human Coronavirus and RSV).\n\nQ5: Is covid one of the viruses it says it can kill?\nA5: Dettol products have demonstrated effectiveness against coronavirus strains from the same family as the 2019 Novel Coronavirus (COVID-19)",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: Dettol can kill coronavirus strains.\n\nverdict: 'Supported'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: The NHS has warned people should not shake hands to prevent the spread of the Wuhan coronavirus\n\nQ1: What we're the guidelines given by the NHS\nA1: The NHS advises against touching your eyes, nose or mouth if your hands are not clean. It does not mention shaking hands.\n\nQ2: What is the date of the claim?\nA2: 27th February 2020.\n\nQ3: Did the NHS guidelines include details around handshakes and spread of Covid?\nA3: The NHS did not specifically suggest avoiding handshaking to prevent the spread of the new coronavirus at the time of the claim.\n\nQ4: Did any NHS advice concern Hands?\nA4: Yes, because Wash your hands",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: The NHS advice people to take extra care to avoid close contact with anyone showing symptoms of COVID-19.\n\nverdict: 'Refuted'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: The CDC recommends men shave their beards to protect against coronavirus.\n\nQ1: Did the CDC recommend men to shave their beards to protect against coronavirus?\nA1: No, the CDC isn’t recommending men shave their beards to protect against the coronavirus.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: The answer suggests that the CDC isn’t recommending men shave their beards to protect against the coronavirus which directly refutes the claim.\n\nverdict: 'Refuted'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: Sen. Lindsey Graham said \"President Donald Trump probably knows more about medicine and specifically viruses than the so called scientists at the NIH and CDC\".\n\nQ1: Does President Donald Trump have a superior knowledge about medicine and specifically viruses than scientists at the NIH and CDC ?\nA1: Donald J. Trump’s own account, he saw higher education as a means to an end. Fordham University and the Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania, where Mr. Trump transferred to complete a bachelor’s degree in economics, were essentially credential factories. To become the real-estate mogul he envisioned, he needed these institutions — but in the same dispassionate way that a mechanic, say, needs a socket wrench.\n\n“In my opinion, that degree doesn’t prove very much, but a lot of people I do business with take it very seriously, and it’s considered very prestigious,",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: Donald trumps qualifications are not medical based.\n\nverdict: 'Refuted'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: Thailand’s Ministry of Health has raised the country’s alert on the novel coronavirus to the highest level.\n\nQ1: What was Thailand's Covid alert level in February and September 2020?\nA1: They were at level 2 with highest being level 3.\n\nQ2: What has Thailand Ministry of Health said about going to the highest level (Stage 3) of Covid alert in 2020?\nA2: The Ministry of Health has said the claim is fake news.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: The Ministry of Health has said the claim is fake news.\n\nverdict: 'Refuted'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: Donald Trump fired his pandemic disease officials in 2018.\n\nQ1: Did Donald Trump fire his pandemic disease officials in 2018?\nA1: No answer could be found.\n\nQ2: Did the officials who were dealing with the pandemic in 2018 leave their positions?\nA2: The abrupt departure of Rear Adm. Timothy Ziemer from the National Security Council means no senior administration official is now focused solely on global health security.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: There is not enough evidence shown to support or refute the claim. I would need to see more info on specific people and whether they left of their own accord or were fired.\n\nverdict: 'Not Enough Evidence'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: COVID-19 cases are going very substantially down, not up.\n\nQ1: When was the claim made\nA1: 26/02/2020\n\nQ2: What was the number of COVID-19 cases on 26 February 2020\nA2: No answer could be found.\n\nQ3: What was the number of COVID-19 cases on 20th February 2020\nA3: 15",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: Numbers increased in the week leading up to the claim.\n\nverdict: 'Refuted'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: US Senator Amy Klobuchar said While we are all sitting here debating, Wisconsin has kicked hundreds of thousands of people off of their voting rolls\n\nQ1: Did the US state of Wisconsin purge hundreds of thousands of people off of their voting rolls in 2020\nA1: Wisconsin appeals court rules voters targeted for purge will remain on the rolls\n\nQ2: Why did the Wisconsin Election Commission send letters to 234,000 voters warning them they may be removed from polls in 2021?\nA2: The Wisconsin Elections Commission last month sent letters to voters who it believes may have moved. The letters told the recipients to update their voter registrations with their new addresses if they have moved or to notify the commission if they have not moved.\n\nThose who don't act on the letters will have their voter registrations suspended after April 2021, according to the commission.\n\nQ3: What did the Wisconsin court rule about the election commission?\nA3: A Wisconsin appeals court Friday struck down an Ozaukee County judge's ruling that thousands of people had to be quickly removed from the state's voter rolls because they are believed to have moved.\n\nThe appeals judges also unanimously overturned a finding that state election officials were in contempt of court for not taking people off the rolls.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: yes, wisconsin has removed people who didn't update their address details, but not random people, the answers showed no evidence that people were unlawfully removed. \n\nverdict: 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: Russian Cops Don’t Beat People For No Reason.\n\nQ1: Are there any documented cases of Russian police beating for no reason?\nA1: Russian national guardsman beat a young man sitting on a bench while a riot policeman holds the victim down.\n\nQ2: Had the protesting woman in relation to this specific claim been confronting police before being beaten?\nA2: No, because The woman was retreating.\n\nQ3: Was the protestor beaten after being restrained by police?\nA3: Yes, because footage shows police grabbed her and started to drag her away. before one of them, as the video shows, punched her in the stomach.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: Russian Cops do beat and attack people for no reason, the sources stated that Russian Cops attacked and beat a young man sitting on a bench while a riot policeman holds the victim down.\n\nverdict: 'Refuted'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: US President Trump called for reduced funding for the Centre for Disease Control and Prevention.\n\nQ1: Did US President Trump propose budget cuts in the funding for the Centre for Disease Control and Prevention?\nA1: Yes, because The White House wants to slash more than $1.2 billion from the CDC’s budget, with the largest cuts coming from public-health preparedness programmes.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: From the source, i saw tangible evidence where it stated that there was a proposal by US President Trump to slash more than $1.2 billion of CDC’s budget. \n\nverdict: 'Supported'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: Bernie Sanders has said things like women get cancer from having too many orgasms, or toddlers should run around naked and touch each others' genitals to insulate themselves from porn … He's written about women's rape fantasies.\n\nQ1: Has Bernie Sanders said women get cancer due to orgasms?\nA1: No, because In a 1969 essay, Bernie Sanders made the claim that a woman's inability to achieve an orgasm is what causes cervical cancer.\n\nQ2: Has Bernie Sanders written on women’s fantasies of rape?\nA2: Yes, because Bernie Sanders wrote a 1972 essay in which he wrote – among other things – that a woman \"fantasizes being raped by three men simultaneously.\"\n\nQ3: Has the Bernie Sanders campaign commented on his 1972 essay, which includes women's fantasies of rape?\nA3: Yes, because Michael Briggs, Sanders’ newly minted campaign spokesman, said the article was a “dumb attempt at dark satire in an alternative publication” that “in no way reflects his views or record on women.”\n\n“It was intended to attack gender stereotypes of the ‘70s, but it looks as stupid today as it was then,” Briggs told CNN.\n\nQ4: Has the Bernie Sanders commented on his 1972 essay, which includes women's fantasies of rape?\nA4: Yes, because Bernie Sanders Talks 1972 'Rape Fantasy' Essay: \n\n“No, it was bad fiction. I learned my lesson. I think I could make a good president, but I write fiction pretty poorly,” he said to laughter and applause from the crowd.\n\nQ5: Has Bernie Sanders spoken on toddlers, nudity and porn?\nA5: Yes, because Bernie Sanders said in a 1969 article, \"In Vermont, at a state beach, a mother is reprimanded by Authority for allowing her 6-month-old daughter to go about without her diapers on. Now, if children go around naked, they are liable to see each others sexual organs, and maybe even touch them. Terrible thing! If we (raise) children up like this it will probably ruin the whole pornography business, not to mention the large segment of the general economy which makes its money by playing on peoples sexual frustrations.\"",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: The sources and answers below show that some of the claim is supported but the claim about women getting cancer has been misconstrued so the claim has conflicting evidence.\n\nverdict: 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: Congress files charges against speaker of the U.S House of Representatives Nancy Pelosi, for tearing up her copy of the State of the Union speech.\n\nQ1: Did Nancy Pelosi tear up her copy of the State of Union speech\nA1: House Speaker Nancy Pelosi ripped up her copy of President Donald Trump’s State of the Union speech and told reporters that tearing up the address was “the courteous thing to do considering the alternatives.”\n\nQ2: Did the Congress file charges against Nancy Pelosi\nA2: No, because First of all, Pelosi didn’t break the law when she tore up a copy of President Donald Trump’s State of the Union address on Feb. 4. Trump, among others, wrongly claimed it was illegal. \n\nAnd while some people have signed a Change.org petition calling for her arrest after she ripped up her copy of the president’s speech, no arrest has happened. We found no news coverage online about Pelosi being taken into custody. If she had been arrested, it would have drawn plenty of media attention.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: Q&A 1 state that the person in the claim did rip up the document as claimed, \nThe 2nd Q&A pair state that it was not illegal, so no arrest would be warranted, and that no details of an arrest are shown in any media which would as she is a well known person so refuted. \n\nverdict: 'Refuted'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: US President Donald Trump got rid of a pandemic response position on the National Security Council.\n\nQ1: Did Trump administration get rid of a pandemic response position on the National Security Council?\nA1: Yes, because The NSC’s Office of Global Health Security and Bio-defense was disbanded in 2018 under the Trump Administration.\n\nQ2: Who was responsible for the disbandment of the NSC’s Office of Global Health Security and Bio-defense?\nA2: National security adviser John Bolton disbanded the NSC’s Office of Global Health Security and Biodefense in May 2018.\n\nQ3: Did President Trump fire the entire pandemic response team in 2018 ?\nA3: Based on our research, the claim that President Trump fired the \"entire\" pandemic response team is PARTLY FALSE. The Directorate of Global Health Security and Biodefense was disbanded under Trump's then-national security adviser John Bolton. But Trump didn't fire its members. Some resigned, and others moved to different units on the National Security Council.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: Q&A 1 states that Trump didn't exactly get rid of the pandemic responce position, but that he did disband the Global Health Security and Biodefense which then led to other members resigning, and being moved to different units so not all as claimed but he was partly. involved in getting rid of what would have been helpful during a pandemic.\n\nverdict: 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: U.S. representatives Donna Shalala and Debbie Mucarsel-Powell were supporting candidates other than Bernie Sanders in the US elections.\n\nQ1: Why is Debbie Mucarsel-Powell reluctant to support Bernie Sanders?\nA1: Due to his comments on Fidel Castro",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: Question only asks about U.S. representative Debbie Mucarsel-Powell reluctance to support Bernie Sanders - no mention on U.S. representative Donna Shalala. Hence, this claim is only half completed.\n\nverdict: 'Not Enough Evidence'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: Kunal Kamra said, The RDX laden car which caused the blast in Pulwama, RTO has not been able to access its papers stating under whose name it was registered, till date. The government wants more than 70 year old papers in the NRC.\n\nQ1: Has Kunal Kamra commented on his Alleged quote?\nA1: Yes he has denied saying it publicly.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: Kunal Kamra denied saying this quote.\n\nverdict: 'Refuted'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: Cuba has a lung cancer vaccine that the US had no access to because it sanctioned Cuba.\n\nQ1: What is the function of a cancer vaccine\nA1: cancer vaccines don’t block disease; their purpose is to shrink existing tumors, and failing that, slow them down.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: The Q&As do not show any evidence about whether Cuba has a cancer vaccine or if the US have sanctioned Cuba so there is not enough evidence to support or refute the claim.\n\nverdict: 'Not Enough Evidence'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: US Senator Bernie Sanders was opposed to Obamacare.\n\nQ1: What is Bernie Sanders Stance on Obamacare?\nA1: Sanders originally said he would not vote for the bill however after an additional proposal was added he voted in favour.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: He was firstly opposed to it, but late voted in favour. \n\nverdict: 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: The majority of hunters and the majority of Trump voters now want universal background checks on gun buyers.\n\nQ1: Do Trump voters support universal background checks on gun buyers in 2020?\nA1: An August 14 2019 Fox News poll found support for proposals requiring criminal background checks on all gun buyers, including those buying at gun shows and private sales from 90% of Trump voters, with 8% signaling opposition and 2% saying they didn’t know.\n\nQ2: Do hunters support universal background checks on all gun buyers in 2020?\nA2: No answer could be found.\n\nQ3: Have hunters supported universal background checks on gun buyers in the past?\nA3: 72 percent of hunters support criminal background checks with some exceptions, with just 26 percent opposing and the remainder undecided, according to a Bull Moose poll conducted between March 9 and March 12 2013.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: The answers and sources show that the majority of hunters and Trump supporters support the checks so the claim is supported.\n\nverdict: 'Supported'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: One offender carried out 93 crimes last year before going to jail for the first time.\n\nQ1: what was the highest number of crimes commited by someone resulting in a conviction in 2019?\nA1: 93 by a female criminal.\n\nQ2: Did she commit the 93 crimes in 2019?\nA2: No answer could be found.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: Although a female did commit 93 crimes, there is no evidence on whether those crimes were committed in 2019. It is also not clear whether the woman has ever been convicted. \n\nverdict: 'Not Enough Evidence'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: Former vice President Joe Biden attacks President Donald Trump over a food stamp policy supported by Mayor Michael Bloomberg\n\nQ1: What is a food stamp policy\nA1: Food and Nutrition Services also known as food stamps is a federal food assistance program that provides low-income families the food they need for a nutritionally adequate diet.\n\nQ2: What food stamps policy did Joe Biden attack Trump over\nA2: No answer could be found.\n\nQ3: What is President Trump's food stamp policy?\nA3: The Trump administration said on Wednesday it will make it harder for states to keep residents in the U.S. food stamp program in a move that is projected to end benefits for nearly 700,000 people.\n\nPresident Donald Trump has argued that many Americans receiving food stamps through the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, known as SNAP, do not need it given the strong economy and low unemployment. The program provides free food to 36 million Americans.\n\nThe administration has now finalized a rule that tightens guidelines on when and where states can waive limits on how long certain residents can receive benefits. The changes will move more “able-bodied” adults into the workplace, U.S. Agriculture Secretary Sonny Perdue said.\n\nQ4: Does President Trump intend to bring in fingerprinting for those wanting to access food stamps?\nA4: Trump has sought to tighten eligibility, but no mention of fingerprinting is made.\n\nQ5: Does Bloomberg support fingerprinting to access food stamps?\nA5: Yes, because In an interview with International Monetary Fund managing director Christine Lagarde, Bloomberg said, \"What we found was that there were a handful of people who signed up under different names, and they were getting four or five times the amount that they were supposed to get, which meant that we couldn’t take care of some of the people who really deserved it. … So what we did is we fingerprinted people so you could only register once. Now, there was a lot of yelling and screaming and saying we’re invading your personal space by looking at your fingerprints. Well that may be, but you can’t come to work for New York City unless we fingerprint you first, so it is not unreasonable to think the beneficiaries of our program would get fingerprinted, too, and we’re just stopping people from breaking the law, which is hurting other people.\"\n\nQ6: What is the correct format for this claim?\nA6: First of all, what the U.S. is doing is immoral. I know that’s not a phrase they often use in politics, but it’s immoral. Look what President Donald Trump is doing right—look what this president’s doing right now. Look at what people have done before. They’re going to fingerprint food stamp recipients.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: Based on the QA pairs it states Biden is speaking of Fingerprinting however in another QA pair it says Trump has not mentioned fingerprinting.\n\nverdict: 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: Mayor Bloomberg blamed African Americans & Latinos for the housing crash of 2008.\n\nQ1: was there a housing crash in the U.S in 2008?\nA1: The financial crisis of 2008 created the biggest disruption to the U.S. housing market since the Great Depression.\n\nQ2: What were the causes of the 2008 Housing crises in the U.S?\nA2: - Borrowers were encouraged to take out\nimprudent loans\n- Lenders were\nencouraged to make risky loans they\nnever would have made if they could not\nhave been bundled into securities and\npassed on to someone else.\n- . Investment\nbanks were permitted to leverage their\ncapital irresponsibly because regulations treated housing loans more favorably than other loans\n\nQ3: Did a single thing cause the 2008 U.S housing crises?\nA3: the crisis was caused by a \"perfect storm\" of economic factors with lots of blame to go around, both in the private sector and government quarters.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: Evidence doesn't mention African Americans or Latinos and their effect on the housing crash of 2008.\n\nverdict: 'Refuted'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: Amy Klobuchar’s health plan is just two paragraphs long.\n\nQ1: How many overall paragraphs does Amy Klobuchar have on her webpage that address her health care plan?\nA1: ...four Klobuchar web pages by our count have 64 paragraphs, not counting overlap.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: She has 64 paraghaphs. \n\nverdict: 'Refuted'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: Car thefts are increasing in 8 of the 10 most populous Wisconsin, US counties\n\nQ1: Have 8 of the 10 most populous Wisconsin counties seen an increase in car thefts?\nA1: Yes, because Confirmed via statistics.\n\nQ2: What are the 2 states not affected?\nA2: Milwaukee and Kenosha\n\nQ3: Have car thefts decreased in number in Milwaukee and Kenosha?\nA3: Yes, because Confirmed in statistics.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: It seems that there has been an increase in car thefts in the state of Wisconsin, even though 2 large counties have not seen an increase, the 8/10 statistic is correct.\n\nverdict: 'Supported'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: Former mayor of New York, US, Mike Bloomberg owns more wealth than the bottom 125 million Americans.\n\nQ1: What is Mike Bloomberg's net worth\nA1: $54.9 Billion\n\nQ2: What is the wealth of households that fall into the bottom 38% (125.7 million people)\nA2: With calculations using the Data in the Federal Reserve's Summary Extract Public Data the amount is $11.4 billion",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: It does indeed seem that the former mayor is wealthier, therefore the claim is supported\n\nverdict: 'Supported'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: Under the government’s new immigration rules anyone earning less than £25,600 is regarded as an unskilled worker.\n\nQ1: What is considered an unskilled worker in the U.K?\nA1: Unskilled work involves simple tasks and doesn't usually require one to exercise judgment. It typically requires only a month or less to learn. Many, but not all, unskilled jobs require physical strength or coordination.\n\nQ2: Do U.K immigration regulations state minimum wage's for an immigrant\nA2: The U.K government accepted The Migration Advisory Committee (MAC) recommendation on salary thresholds, including to lower the general salary threshold from £30,000 to £25,600.\n\nQ3: Does only a skilled worker need to be paid a minimum under the governments immigration rules?\nA3: No, because All workers must earn the same minimum, However, if they earn less than the required minimum salary threshold, but no less than £20,480, they may still be able to come if they can demonstrate that they have a job offer in a specific shortage occupation,\n\nQ4: Do U.K immigration regulations state minimum wage's for an immigrant?\nA4: The U.K government accepted The Migration Advisory Committee (MAC) recommendation on salary thresholds, including to lower the general salary threshold from £30,000 to £25,600.\n\nQ5: Does the definition of \"unskilled worker\" include reference to the salary earned?\nA5: No, because Whether a job is skilled or unskilled is not determined by the level of pay.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: A pay of £25,600 does not equates to an unskilled worker level of pay. All workers must earn the same minimum wage. \n\nverdict: 'Refuted'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: While he was mayor of NYC, Bloomberg cut stop-and-frisk by 95% because they were doing too many.\n\nQ1: When was Bloomberg mayor of NYC?\nA1: He was the 108th Mayor of New York City for three terms from 2002 to 2013\n\nQ2: What are the stop-and frisk stats for 2002-2013?\nA2: The NYPD stopped and interrogated people 684,330 times in 2011, by far the highest total since the Police Department began collecting data on its troubling stop-and-frisk program in 2002. This represents a 603 percent increase in stop-and-frisks since that year, the first year of the Bloomberg administration, when there were only 97,296 stops.\n\nQ3: Was the stop-and-frisk policy challenged?\nA3: Yes, because In 2012 the NYCLU sued the NYPD over stop-and-frisk abuse at private residential buildings, and in January 2013 a federal court found widespread constitutional violations. In August 2013 the court found similar violations in a much broader case brought by the Center for Constitutional Rights challenging street stops generally.\n\nQ4: Does Bloomberg support the stop-and-frisk policy?\nA4: Yes, because Bloomberg made it clear that he absolutely supported stop-and-frisk, and dismissed critics as a vocal minority\n\nQ5: Did Bloomberg cut the stop and frisk checking to 95 % ?\nA5: The reduction Bloomberg touted is based on a comparison of data from the beginning of 2012 and the end of 2013, the end of his time in office. \n\nBut as Bloomberg himself acknowledged, stop and frisks had ballooned before that period under his watch. The declines toward the end of his tenure came as the city faced public criticism over the policy and a lawsuit that questioned the legality of the police behavior and its impact on minorities. So while there was ultimately a sharp decline, Bloomberg had presided over a sharp increase in stop and frisks for most of his time as mayor.\nHe did actually reduce stop & frisk to a great extent. Si I rate this claim as refuted.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: The reduction Bloomberg touted is based on a comparison of data from the beginning of 2012 and the end of 2013, the end of his time in office. \n\nverdict: 'Refuted'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: VIRAL IMAGE SHOWS SENATOR JAMES INHOFE NOW SERVES AS THE EPA’S CHIEF OF STAFF\n\nQ1: the viral image demonstrates which context?\nA1: The Washington Post reported Feb. 14 that Mandy Gunasekara, a former top EPA air policy official, has been tapped to return as the agency’s chief of staff, but the EPA hasn’t made any announcements to that effect at the time of publication.\n\nQ2: What is the 'EPA' organisation in the claim?\nA2: The U.S Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).\n\nQ3: What is the date of the claim?\nA3: February 18th 2020.\n\nQ4: Did JAMES INHOFE take the post of the EPA's chief of staff around 18th February 2020?\nA4: Ryan Jackson was Chief of Staff at EPA until February 21\n\nQ5: Who took over after 21st February 2020 after Ryan Jackson left the role?\nA5: Michael Molina became Acting Chief of Staff after Ryan Jackson.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: James Inhofe was not the EPA chief of staff at the time of the claim.\n\nverdict: 'Refuted'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: Biden was arrested in 1977 in South Africa when trying to meet Nelson Mandela.\n\nQ1: Had Biden ever mentioned being arrested trying to see Nelson Mandela before?\nA1: No it is not featured in his memoirs.\n\nQ2: Has anyone spoke of the alleged arrest?\nA2: Andrew Young, a former congressman and mayor of Atlanta who was the U.S. ambassador to the United Nations from 1977 to 1979, said that he had traveled with Mr. Biden over the years, including to South Africa. But Mr. Young said that he had never been arrested in South Africa and expressed skepticism that members of Congress would have faced arrest there.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: Q1 is unanswerable - before what? I don't think the answer should include \"no\". He may have chosen not to include it in his memoirs, for example. The source is dated Feb 2020 but was updated in Jan 2021.\nHowever, the evidence at Q&A2 indicates the claim may be false. The evidence could have been expanded upon, especially at Q&A1 where a couple more answers could have been given.\n\n\nverdict: 'Refuted'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: $150 million had been collected by the Australian Red Cross as of 16/02/2020.\n\nQ1: Is $150 million collected by the Australian Red Cross as of 16/02/2020?\nA1: At the time of the February 16 post, $140 million had been donated to the Australian Red Cross for bushfire victims not $150 million as claimed. Regarding the claim the charity had only distributed $7 million “in $10,000 lots”, this was not correct at the time of the post. The Australian Red Cross had paid $32 million in emergency grants, according to a media release dated February 13. The charity also announced on February 3 that it was providing an additional $10,000 to extend the amount available to $20,000 as part of its immediate assistance.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: As at 16th February 2020, 140 million dollars had been donated \n\nverdict: 'Refuted'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: The High court in India, passed a mandatory order that says Bank of Baroda’s license must be revoked.\n\nQ1: Has Bank of Baroda's license been revoked by the High Court of India?\nA1: No, they did not pass an order to revoke the license.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: The source denies the claim.\n\nverdict: 'Refuted'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: Of the $150 million, only $7 million in $10,000 lots had been given out to bushfire victims by the Australian Red Cross as of the 16/02/2020.\n\nQ1: At the time of the claim, how much had the Australian Red Cross distributed to victims of bushfires?\nA1: By Thursday, (January 24th 2020) the organisation said of the $115m it has raised since July, $30m had been allocated for immediate assistance, $18m would go to a three-year bushfire recovery program and $1m had been set aside for a bereavement allowance. It has already issued 690 grants, totalling $6.9m so far.\n\nQ2: What was the data for February?\nA2: These grants more than double existing immediate financial assistance, with the Red Cross Bushfire Advisory Panel allocating a further $30.5 million, with a new total of $61.5 million now available for immediate cash relief. Currently, around $1 million a day is being distributed to people impacted by the fires.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: As of February, around $1 million a day is being distributed to bushfire victims \n\nverdict: 'Refuted'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: World Health Organization says a “child’s presence in school counts as ‘informed consent’ for vaccination\".\n\nQ1: What is the WHOs policy on vaccination for children under the age of 16\nA1: A 2014 WHO report outlines three commonly used consent processes for vaccination programs: written, verbal and implied.\n\nQ2: According to the WHO, is a child appearing in school tantamount to giving consent for vaccination\nA2: Some laws and regulations are\nin place that identify school- or social-services\nofficials as appointed guardians for children\nand adolescents not living with their parents,\nincluding adolescents in boarding school. This is\nalso called “third party consent”. In such cases,\nthese third parties can provide consent for\nmedical care, including vaccination of specific,\nindividual children.\n\nQ3: How does informed consent work, would parents be contacted in various ways before the consent is implied?\nA3: An implied consent process by which\nparents are informed of imminent vaccination\nthrough social mobilization and communication,\nsometimes including letters directly addressed to\nthe parents.\n\nQ4: So if after these communications a parent has not opted out, does a child being at school imply consent?\nA4: Subsequently, the physical presence\nof the child or adolescent, with or without an\naccompanying parent at the vaccination session, is\nconsidered to imply consent.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: QAs show WHO’s policy is that a child’s presence can be considered informed consent if the parent has not opted out having been notified of the imminent vaccination via ‘social mobilisation and communication’ i.e. presence is not automatically deemed to be informed consent.\n\nverdict: 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: Rashtriya Sikhshit Berojgar Yojna launched a scheme to pay Rs 50,000 to educated unemployed citizens in India.\n\nQ1: How many citizens in the scheme applicable to?\nA1: 40,000 citizens\n\nQ2: Is it true that Rashtriya Sikhshit Berojgar Yojna launched a scheme to pay Rs 50,000 to educated unemployed citizens in India?\nA2: No, because The Press Information Bureau issued the following tweet in relation to the Rashtriya Sikhshit Berojgar claim...\nNo such scheme has been launched by Govt of India. Beware of such fake and fraudulent sites collecting your personal info/fees",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: Refuted in QA pair as no such scheme launced.\n\nverdict: 'Refuted'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: A U.S. federal judge released Benghazi evidence that puts former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton in deep trouble.\n\nQ1: When was this claim made?\nA1: 15/02/2020\n\nQ2: When and where was this claim published?\nA2: 18/10/2018 by Patriot Journal.\n\nQ3: What was the claim based on?\nA3: In a combative exchange at a hearing Friday in Washington, D.C., a federal judge unabashedly accused career State Department officials of lying and signing \"clearly false\" affidavits to derail a series of lawsuits seeking information about former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton's private email server and her handling of the 2012 terrorist attack on the U.S. Consulate in Benghazi, Libya.\n\nQ4: Has there been any evidence on Hilary Clinton mishandling her emails?\nA4: No deliberate mishandling has been found",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: Evidence finds that there was no deliberate mishandling by Hillary regarding her emails. A federal judge unabashedly accused career State Department officials of lying and signing \"clearly false\" affidavits to derail a series of lawsuits seeking information about former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton's private email server and her handling of the 2012 terrorist attack on the U.S. Consulate in Benghazi, Libya. Therefore, the claim is refuted.\n\nverdict: 'Refuted'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: FBI Ignored Evidence That Hillary Clinton Put A Hit Out On Brett Kavanaugh.\n\nQ1: Where did the claim originate?\nA1: wearethellod.com\n\nQ2: What is known about wearethellod.com ?\nA2: It is a satire website.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: The claim originated from a satirical website.\n\nverdict: 'Refuted'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: Very close to 160 million people are now working in the United States.\n\nQ1: How many people were working in the United States in December 2019?\nA1: Seasonally adjusted, around 158.7 million people were working in December 2019.\n\nQ2: How many people were working in the United States in unadjusted data in December 2019?\nA2: In the unadjusted data, 158.5 million people were working in December 2019.\n\nQ3: What was the population average of people working in the United States in December 2019?\nA3: 60.9\n\nQ4: What was the population average of people working in the United States in December 2010?\nA4: 58.3",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: This is true, the unadjusted number is very close to 160 million people working in the US. \n\nverdict: 'Supported'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: A doctor's office in New South Wales was visited by people who had been exposed to the coronavirus.\n\nQ1: Did new south wales endure a coronavirus outbreak in 2020?\nA1: Three cases of coronavirus confirmed in NSW in nan 2020\n\nQ2: Did any people with coronavirus visit their doctor?\nA2: They contacted their GP, they called ahead and were double-masked when they presented to the GP clinic.\n\nQ3: Did a doctor in Wales have Covid-19 patients in his office\nA3: Three adult males have been diagnosed with the novel coronavirus. Two cases had travelled to Wuhan, China and one case had direct contact with a confirmed case from Wuhan while in China.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: QA sources provide evidence that at least 2 people confirmed as having coronavirus in New South Wales had visited a GP, though it’s not clear if it was one particular doctor’s office.\n\nverdict: 'Supported'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: Bernie Sanders returns a donation from Mike Bloomberg in the amount of $18.53\n\nQ1: Was there a donation made to Sander's campaign by Bloomberg\nA1: Bloomberg did donate $18.53 but it wasn't meant to be a donation but a prank\n\nQ2: Did Sanders return the $18.53\nA2: There's no proof he returned the money. Sanders only made a statement that he doesn't want anything to do with billionaires even if they're donating to his campaign",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: It seems from the2nd QA that there is no proof that Sanders returned the money, therefore the claim is refuted\n\nverdict: 'Refuted'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: BJP leaders did not say that Shaheen Bagh protestors will enter homes and rape women and daughters.\n\nQ1: BJP MP parvesh Verma said Shaheen Bagh protestors will enter houses, rape sisters & daughters, kill them.\nA1: Yes, because The BJP MP did make the quote about protestors.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: The quote is verified by a publication which claims to be credible.\n\nverdict: 'Refuted'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: Donald Trump cut scheduled federal worker pay raises in early 2020\n\nQ1: What pay rise were federal workers due in early 2020?\nA1: Federal workers were due to see a scheduled 2.5% pay rise as stated by Trump in a letter to Congress on the 10th February - “Under current law, locality pay increases averaging 20.67% costing $21 billion in the first year alone, would go into effect in January 2021, in addition to a 2.5% across-the-board increase for the base General Schedule.”\n\nQ2: Did Trump cut this pay rise?\nA2: Yes, because Trump wrote in a Feb. 10 letter to Congress. “We must maintain efforts to put our nation on a fiscally sustainable course; federal agency budgets cannot sustain such increases. Accordingly, I have determined that it is appropriate to exercise my authority to set alternative pay adjustments for 2021.”\n\nQ3: What did he cut the pay rise to?\nA3: 1% - “Our pay system must reform to align with mission-critical recruitment and retention goals, and to reward employees whose performance provides value for the American people,” Trump wrote. “For this purpose, my budget further directs agencies to increase awards spending in FY 2021 by an amount equal to no less than 1% of total salary spending. My administration will continue to support reforms that advance these aims.”",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: Donald Trump announced the cut in February 2020\n\nverdict: 'Supported'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: At the level of gender, at senior management level in South Africa, males remain dominant at 67.6% and females at 32.4%\n\nQ1: What percentage of senior management is male in South Africa?\nA1: 67.6% of employees at senior management level were men, in 2015/2016 and 65.5% in 2018-2019\n\nQ2: What percentage of senior management is female in South Africa?\nA2: 32.4% of employees at senior management level were men, in 2015/2016 and 34.5% in 2018-2019",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: From both question and answer pairs it seems that the claim is supported. There is indeed only 32.4% of females in senior management in South Africa.\n\nverdict: 'Supported'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: US Senator Amy Klobuchar vows to resettle no refugees in her neighbourhood.\n\nQ1: Did US Senator Amy Klobuchar vow to resettle refugees in 2020?\nA1: Yes, because Sen. Amy Klobuchar (D-MN) vowed to increase the number of refugees resettled in the United States by more than 500 percent if elected president.\n\nQ2: Did Senator Amy Klobuchar exclude her home area from the areas for refugee resettlement?\nA2: No, because She made no specific statement about location.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: The sources show that the senator did not make any claim about where refugees would be resettled so the claim is refuted.\n\nverdict: 'Refuted'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: Since the [Safe] initiative was launched, 699 schools have been provided with safe and appropriate sanitation facilities and projects and a further 1,150 schools are either in planning, design or construction stages.\n\nQ1: What is the SAFE initiative?\nA1: it's a government programme that aims to replace all pit latrines and other unacceptable toilet facilities at public schools\n\nQ2: When was the SAFE initiative launched?\nA2: The Sanitation Appropriate for Education – Safe – initiative, launched in August 2018\n\nQ3: How many schools were identified as needing attention from the SAFE initiative?\nA3: Records from a committee meeting note that when the Safe initiative was launched and a desktop audit conducted, 3,898 schools were identified as needing attention.\n\nQ4: Up to the the 2019-2020 financial year, how many projects have been completed?\nA4: For the 2019/20 financial year, there are 1,007 projects: 880 in the planning stage and 127 under construction. The number of completed projects stands at 188. \n\nThis would bring the total number of completed projects to 975. However, as with the initial claim, it is difficult to verify the figure.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: It seems from the 4th QA that it is quite hard to pin down the exact number. Therefore the claim is labelled as not enough evidence \n\nverdict: 'Not Enough Evidence'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: Turkey is responsible for the escalating tensions between Turkey and Russia in northwest Syria.\n\nQ1: Before 2020, what was the relationship between Russia and Turkey over north-west Syria?\nA1: In 2018 Russia and Turkey agreed de-escalation zones and an all-sides ceasefire in north-west Syria.\n\nQ2: Have all parties honoured the 2018 agreement?\nA2: In April 2019 Syria launched a military offensive, breaking the ceasefire and disrupting Turkish-Russian co-operation in the area.\nIn February 2020 13 Turkish soldiers were killed and Turkey retaliated against the Syrian government.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: Based on QA Pairs it seems Syria initially acted and escalated tensions.\n\nverdict: 'Refuted'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: Donald Trump cited 'serious economic conditions' as the reason for reducing federal worker pay raises in early 2020\n\nQ1: What percentage did Donald Trump originally plan to raise federal workers wages by in January 2021?\nA1: 2.6%\n\nQ2: Why did Donald Trump reduce federal worker pay rises in early 2020?\nA2: Trump proposed that pay raises for civilian federal workers be limited to 1% in 2021 in a bid to \"maintain efforts to put our Nation on a fiscally sustainable course.\" He described a pay increase above 1% as \"inappropriate.\"\n\"This alternative pay plan decision will not materially affect our ability to attract and retain a well qualified Federal workforce,\" the President wrote.\n\nIn limiting federal pay raises, Trump cited his statutory authority to adjust pay because of \"national emergency or serious economic conditions affecting the general welfare,\" but the President frequently touts a growing US economy, including a strong growth rate for the gross domestic product and low unemployment.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: Trump proposed that pay raises for civilian federal workers be limited to 1% in 2021 in a bid to maintain efforts to put our Nation on a fiscally sustainable course.He described a pay increase above 1% as inappropriate.\n\n\nverdict: 'Supported'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: Government is actively involved in the property sector, having provided more than 4 million houses since 1994.\n\nQ1: Which country does the claim refer to?\nA1: South Africa.\n\nQ2: When was the claim made?\nA2: 13th Febuary 2020.\n\nQ3: How many homes have been provided by the South African Government from 1994 till 2020?\nA3: 3,030,824 housing units were delivered from 1994/1995 to 2015/16\n\nQ4: How many houses were delivered in 2016/17?\nA4: A total of 90,692 houses were built in the 2016/17 financial year\n\nQ5: How many houses were delivered in 2017/18?\nA5: 86,048 in 2017/18\n\nQ6: How many houses were delivered in 2028/19?\nA6: 77,584 in 2018/19.\n\nQ7: What do all the years between 1994 and 2020 add up to?\nA7: 3,285,148.\n\nQ8: Do the figures shown from the department of human settlements show all housing supplied by the government of SA?\nA8: These numbers do not include what is called 'serviced sites'\n\nQ9: When 'serviced sites' are included in the housing numbers what is the total provided housing?\nA9: 4.7 million.\n\nQ10: Are there any concerns over the figures provided by the 'department of human settlements'?\nA10: professor Aly Karam warns that the department’s housing statistics “have not been independently verified and should be read with caution, as indicative rather than entirely conclusive”.\n\nQ11: What is a service site?\nA11: Sites that have the potential to become homes, but are not yet developed.\n\nQ12: Are serviced sites considered houses when referring to the housing data?\nA12: Housing units and serviced sites are counted separately.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: It is true that government of South Africa is actively involved in the property sector, but the number 4 millon is not fully supported, if we do not consider serviced sites.\n\nverdict: 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: There has been no load shedding since August last 2015\n\nQ1: Was there any load shedding after August 2015 in South Africa?\nA1: yes on 14th September 2015.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: There has been load shedding since August 2015\n\nverdict: 'Refuted'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: Gov. Tony Evers wants to release half of the prison population.\"\n\nQ1: Did Tony Evers pledge to reduce the prison population?\nA1: Evers has said for years he wants to address overcrowding in Wisconsin’s prison system. But he and his administration have also expressed the need to do it carefully and gradually.\n\nQ2: Did he claim he would release prisoners?\nA2: During the 2018 campaign, Evers told the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel he would consider releasing some inmates early, overhauling truth-in-sentencing and treating 17-year-olds as juveniles instead of adults, among other policies. He also said, during a Democratic debate, that cutting the prison population in half is \"a goal that’s worth accomplishing.\"\n\nQ3: Does Tony Evers plan on reducing prison population\nA3: State Schools Superintendent Tony Evers said Wisconsin needs to follow the example of states like Texas that have cut parole revocations and expanded drug courts. He said he would consider releasing some inmates early; providing more drug treatment behind bars; treating 17-year-olds as juveniles instead of adults for criminal charges; and overhauling truth-in-sentencing so prisoners could be released for good behavior.\n\n“The fact that we as a state spend more on corrections than (the University of Wisconsin) System tells me the last thing we need is to build a brand-new prison,” he said in an emailed statement.\n\nQ4: Does he plan on reducing half of the prison population\nA4: He only said he would want to release some prisoners early and didn't give a specific number of prisoners he intends on releasing",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: Whilst he has praised the goal of cutting the prison population in half, and supported plans to address overcrowding, he has not specified specific details. \n\nverdict: 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: To curb water wastage, the Department of Water and Sanitation has begun its programme of training 15,000 young people as artisans.\n\nQ1: What is the Department of Water and Sanitation's programme of training?\nA1: The department of water and sanitation launched their War on Leaks project in August 2015.\n\nQ2: How many people did they aim to train?\nA2: Its initial aim was to train 15,000 artisans, water agents and plumbers from 2015/16 to 2017/18. They would fix leaking taps and pipes in their communities, helping promote water conservation. Water agents were tasked with educating the public on how to use water wisely and manage water resources.\n\nQ3: Have they begun the programme?\nA3: Phase 1 of the project was meant to be completed in the 2015/16 financial year, after 3,000 artisans, plumbers and water agents were trained. Figures from November 2019 show that 1,726 candidates completed their training.\n\nAnother 5,000 were meant to be trained in 2016/17, when phase 2 started. But the available data shows that only 3,854 people were trained. \n\nPhase 3 was “put on hold” due to the department’s “funding challenges”. A commitment to more funding was reportedly made in January 2020.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: The Department of Water and Sanitation started the program to train 15000 artisans in 2015\n\nverdict: 'Supported'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: BJP, the Bharatiya Janata Party lost a total of 8 seats by a margin of fewer than 100 votes, 19 seats by less than 1000 votes and 9 seats by less than 2000 votes, in India.\n\nQ1: How many seats were lost in total according to the claim?\nA1: 36 Seats.\n\nQ2: In the results of the general elections at the time of the claim in February 2020 were any of the margins fewer than 100?\nA2: No, because No margins were below 100. The lowest margin was 753.\n\nQ3: In the results of the general elections at the time of the claim in February 2020 how many vote margins were below 1000?\nA3: Just two seats had a margin of below 1000. One at 753 and another with 880.\n\nQ4: How many seats had a margin of under 2000 but more than 1000?\nA4: Just one with 1589 votes.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: The answers clearly deny the claim.\n\nverdict: 'Refuted'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: US Senator Amy Klobuchar vows to resettle 500 percent more refugees, none in her neighbourhood.\n\nQ1: Did US Senator Amy Klobuchar vow to resettle 500 percent more refugees\nA1: Senator Klobuchar will direct the State Department to restore the cap to at least its pre-Trump Administration level\n\nQ2: Do all U.S states allow resettlement of refugees?\nA2: No, because Donald Trump in September signed Executive Order 13888 . The order requires states and counties to notify the State Department, in writing, whether they will consent to receive refugees from the department's Reception and Placement Program.\n\nQ3: When was the Peak of refugee resettlements in the U.S?\nA3: Refugee resettlement efforts peaked in 1980 when the country resettled over 200,000 refugees, most of whom were fleeing Communist Vietnam.\n\nQ4: Where is Sen. Amy Klobuchar's home?\nA4: Klobuchar now lives on the border of Capitol Hill and NoMa\n\nQ5: Is Amy klobuchar republican or democrat?\nA5: Amy Klobuchar has emerged as a standard-bearer for the Democratic center\n\nQ6: Does the U.S democratic party support resettling refugees in the U.S?\nA6: Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Rodham Clinton said the U.S. should welcome refugees\n\nQ7: What was the total number of refuges admitted to the us in 2017?\nA7: 53,691\n\nQ8: Who was president in 2017?\nA8: Donald J. Trump’s presidency ran from 2017 - 2021\n\nQ9: Is Donald trump a democrat?\nA9: Donald Trump accepted the Republican nomination for President.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: The evidence is not clear on whether Amy Klobuchar intends to resettle \"500\" percent more refugees, although she will direct the State Department to restore the cap to at least its pre-Trump Administration level. It is also not clear what the cap was before Trump. Evidence also does not clarify where the refugees will be placed, though states and counties are required to notify the state department, in writing, whether they will consent to receive refugees from the department's reception and placement program. Hence, it feels like some information is still missing.\n\nverdict: 'Not Enough Evidence'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: Hollywood actor Mel Gibson says, \"The only reason liberals hate Trump is they hate God\"\n\nQ1: Who posted the article that states that Mel Gibson said this comment?\nA1: Bustatroll.org\n\nQ2: Who is Bustatroll ?\nA2: Christopher Blair - one of the world’s most\nprolific writers of disinformation",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: The second answer shows that the author of the claim is known for disinformation.\n\nverdict: 'Refuted'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: A bowl of “freshly” boiled garlic water cures ‘Wuhan’s coronavirus.\n\nQ1: Can garlic cure the novel coronavirus?\nA1: WHO does not recommend self-medication with any medicines, including antibiotics, as a prevention or cure for COVID-19. WHO is coordinating efforts to develop treatments for COVID-19 and will continue to provide new information as it becomes available.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: The credible source shows that there are no cures for covid as yet and so the claim is refuted.\n\nverdict: 'Refuted'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: Sri Lanka's Ehelepola Walawwa Mansion school will be converted into a Muslim school.\n\nQ1: Is Sri Lanka's Ehelepola Walawwa Mansion school being converted into a Muslim school?\nA1: No, because The Ehelepola Walawwa is being renovated \"without a clear idea of its future use, but it is considering to turn the place\ninto a local food restaurant and a craft store.\"",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: Seems from the QA that the school will not be converted into a Muslim school. Therefore, the label is refuted\n\nverdict: 'Refuted'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: The USA has succeeded in reducing greenhouse emissions in previous years.\n\nQ1: When did greenhouse gas emissions drop in the USA?\nA1: In 2017, total gross U.S. greenhouse gas emissions were 6,472.3 MMT, or million metric tons, carbon dioxide (CO2) Eq.\n\nQ2: What were the total gross U.S. greenhouse gas emissions in 2007?\nA2: In 2007, total gross U.S. greenhouse gas emissions were 7,371 MMT.\n\nQ3: Did the total gross U.S. greenhouse gas emissions rise after 2017?\nA3: Yes, because After three years of decline, US carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions rose sharply last year. Based on preliminary power generation, natural gas, and oil consumption data, we estimate emissions increased by 3.4% in 2018.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: It is true they did reduce emissions however they have now increased again. It is unknown exactly what years are being referred to.\n\nverdict: 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: Thailand cured a COVID-19 patient within 48 hours using a cocktail of an anti-HIV drug and an antiviral drug used for treating influenza.\n\nQ1: what thai treatment for covid-19?\nA1: Multiple social media posts and media reports shared hundreds of times in February 2020 claim Thailand has cured a COVID-19 patient within 48 hours using a cocktail of an anti-HIV drug and an antiviral drug used for treating influenza. The claim is misleading; Thai doctors say the cocktail of drugs did greatly improve the condition of the patient over 48 hours but did not cure them of the viral infection; the World Health Organisation (WHO) said there is “no specific medicine” to prevent or treat novel coronavirus as of February 14, 2020.\n\nQ2: is there a cure for coronavirus?\nA2: No, because No known cure at the time of the claim.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: They could not have cured COVID-19 because there is no known cure for it\n\nverdict: 'Refuted'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: The salaries of MPs in the UK have grown faster than the starting salaries of nurses, teachers and police officers between 2010 and 2020.\n\nQ1: How much did the salaries of UK MPs grow by between 2010 and 2020?\nA1: In April 2010 MPs earned £65,738.\nIn April 2019 MPs earned \t£79,468.\nThe increase in salaries over that period is £13,730 - a 21% increase in absolute terms.\n\nQ2: How much did the starting salaries of police officers in the UK increase by between 2010 and 2020?\nA2: In 2010 the starting salary for constables was £23,259.\n\nQ3: How much did the starting salaries of teachers in the UK increase by between 2010 and 2020?\nA3: In 2010 the starting salary for classroom teachers in England and Wales was £21,588.\n\nQ4: How much did the starting salaries of nurses in the UK increase by between 2010 and 2020?\nA4: The starting salary for qualified nurses (band 5) in 2010 was £21,176.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: The difference in the salary gap over the years shows that the MP salary has grown faster than that of the others \n\nverdict: 'Supported'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: Presidential candidate Bernie Sanders said supporting abortion up to birth is an \"essential part of being a Democrat.\"\n\nQ1: Did Presidential candidate Bernie Sanders say supporting abortion up to birth is an \"essential part of being a Democrat\"?\nA1: No, because At a February 8, 2020 forum on the federal judiciary. Sanders' stated \"“I think being pro-choice is an absolutely essential part of being a Democrat,” - hence he did not specify at what point an abortion should be carried out.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: This is a quote claim which the answer and source refute. Or, it could be cherrypicking.\n\nverdict: 'Refuted'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: As of February 10th 2020, the United States only had 11 cases of Coronavirus\n\nQ1: How many cases of Covid19 had been reported in the US on 10th Feb 2020?\nA1: 13\n\nQ2: How many cases of COVID-19 had been reported in the United States on 10th Feb 2020?\nA2: 13",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: There were 13\n\nverdict: 'Refuted'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: People were pursued with Fulani Knives after an attack on Peter Obi's Convoy in Abuja Market.\n\nQ1: Was Peter Obi's convoy attacked in Abuja\nA1: A tweet from his official twitter account establishes that neither he nor his convoy was attacked in Abuja\n\nQ2: Were people attacked after the convoy of Peter Obi left\nA2: Yes, because Video evidence shows some parts of the attack\n\nQ3: Were the people chased with knives and by Fulanis\nA3: There is no evidence of such as presented in the video that is linked in the source",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: \\Seems from the 1st and 2nd QA that the claim is refuted\n\nverdict: 'Refuted'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: Seven Cars in Peter Obi's Convoy were burnt by Hausa Men during an attack at Abuja Market\n\nQ1: Was Peter Obi at Dei Dei market on 9th February 2020\nA1: He was there on the said date\n\nQ2: Was he attacked during his visit to the market\nA2: According to his official twitter account, he had already left before the attack took place in the market\n\nQ3: So did Peter Obi's convoy get attacked?\nA3: No, because His convoy was not attacked \n\nFrom his Twitter account Following the departure of my team from Dei-Dei market, I’ve gotten reports of unprovoked attack on supporters of PDP who overwhelmingly turned up to welcome us",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: Peter Obi's convoy e had already left before the attack took place in the market. Hence, the claim is refuted. \n\nverdict: 'Refuted'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: President Trump said he removed Lt. Col. Alexander Vindman from the White House's National security Council because his superior publicly stated that 'Vindman had problems with judgment, adhering to the chain of command, and leaking information'\n\nQ1: Did President Trump say he removed Lt. Col. Alexander Vindman from the White House's National security Council because his superior publicly stated that 'Vindman had problems with judgment, adhering to the chain of command, and leaking information'?\nA1: On Saturday morning, Trump tweeted: \"Fake News @CNN & MSDNC keep talking about “Lt. Col.” Vindman as though I should think only how wonderful he was. Actually, I don’t know him, never spoke to him, or met him (I don’t believe!) but, he was very insubordinate, reported contents of my “perfect” calls incorrectly, &... ....was given a horrendous report by his superior, the man he reported to, who publicly stated that Vindman had problems with judgement, adhering to the chain of command and leaking information. In other words, “OUT”.\"\n\nQ2: Why was Lt. Col. Alexander Vindman removed from the White House's National Security Council?\nA2: Vindman's removal from a detail at the NSC came hours after the president told reporters he was \"not happy\" with the aide. \nAn Army spokeswoman said in a statement that the two men had been transferred: \"We can confirm that both Lt. Cols. Vindman have been reassigned to the Department of the Army, out of respect for their privacy, we will not be providing any further information at this time.\nEarlier in the day the president made clear that he expected action on Vindman, but said the NSC would decide what to do with him.\n\n“Well, I'm not happy with him,” the president told reporters in comments on the White House lawn. “You think I'm supposed to be happy with him? I'm not. They'll make that decision.”",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: The answers show that the Lt was removed because of security issues so the claim is supported.\n\nverdict: 'Supported'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: Cocaine kills the Coronavirus.\n\nQ1: Is there a current treatment for COVID-19?\nA1: No, because There is currently no vaccine to prevent coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19).\n\nQ2: Can cocaine kill the Coronavirus?\nA2: No, because The highly addictive drug cannot treat or cure coronavirus.\n\nQ3: At the time of the claim was there a cure for COVID-19?\nA3: COVID-19: February–June 2020 World Health Organisation progress report Accelerating priority research and innovation - A Global Research Roadmap and call to action. - \"There are no vaccines against COVID-19, no curative treatments, and a need for diagnostic tests that can produce rapid, accurate results in a variety of different settings at scale. To meet these extraordinary challenges, the world required an emergency mechanism to coordinate global research and development efforts by a diverse range of stakeholders, from academics and industry to national governments.\" - \"On 11–12 February 2020, WHO convened the Global Research Forum, engaging a broad group of policy makers, researchers, public health experts, non‑governmental organizations, funders, and the private sector. Crucially, the forum engaged researchers from affected countries to set priorities that respond to country needs, and that reduce barriers and maximize opportunities for research at national level.\n\nQ4: Is there any evidence to support the claim that cocaine can kill the Coronavirus?\nA4: “No, cocaine does not protect against COVID-19,” the official advice from France’s Ministry of Solidarity and Health said. “It’s an addictive drug that causes serious adverse and harmful effects.”",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: No evidence to support the claim so it is refuted.\n\nverdict: 'Refuted'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: Over 700,000 children accessed early childhood education in South Africa in 2018\n\nQ1: How many children under the age of four were attending day care centre, crèche, early childhood development centre (ECD) playgroup, nursery school or preprimary school ?\nA1: Just over 2 million (2017 general household survey)",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: As long as the figure did not drop below 2 million as it suggests that is the figure from 2017 then the claim appears to be supported as over 2 million children were in some kind of early childhood eduction.\n\nverdict: 'Supported'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: China sought court approval to kill over 20,000 patients who were infected by the deadly novel Coronavirus\n\nQ1: Where was the claim first published\nA1: It was published on a website called AB-TC.com\n\nQ2: What kind of website is AB-TC.com\nA2: It is a website that specializes in publishing fake news as xan be attested to be the denial of several stories on their website including that by the Singapore government among others",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: From the 2nd QA it is evident that the website js fake news. So label is refuted \n\nverdict: 'Refuted'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: William Barr tweeted, “ IN A COMPLETELY UNRELATED STORY Senator Mitt Romney is also the only Republican Senator who has a son who sits on the board of a Ukrainian Energy Company.”\n\nQ1: Did William Barr tweet, “ IN A COMPLETELY UNRELATED STORY Senator Mitt Romney is also the only Republican Senator who has a son who sits on the board of a Ukrainian Energy Company.”?\nA1: No, William Barr didn’t tweet this about Mitt Romney",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: Question and answers use the metadata to refute the claim.\n\nverdict: 'Refuted'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: China is seeking the court's permission to kill over 20,000 coronavirus patients in order to prevent the virus from spreading further.\n\nQ1: How many patients have COVID-19 as of February 2020 in China?\nA1: As of February 4, 2020, more than 20,000 cases of COVID-19 have been reported, with 98.9% (total of 19,780) of them in China.\n\nQ2: How many cases of COVID-19 have been reported worldwide as of February 2020?\nA2: over 20,000 cases worldwide\n\nQ3: Did China did not seek court’s approval to kill over 20,000 coronavirus patients ?\nA3: We did research and noticed that no reports were published by the following media outlets. This shows the owner of ab-tc.com domain has multiple websites which mislead people.\nTherefore, the viral article published by ab-tc.com is fabricated and the website should not be considered as a reliable source of information. The claim that China has not sought the court’s approval to take the life of 20,000 coronavirus patients is false",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: the website is well known for posting false news, and there is no evidence that china is doing this. So it is refuted. \n\nverdict: 'Refuted'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: William Barr tweeted, “BREAKING NEWS Senator Mitt Romney is the only Republican Senator who voted to remove President Trump from office\n\nQ1: How many Republican senators voted to remove Donald Trump from office?\nA1: Only one Republican-Mitt Romney\n\nQ2: What Twitter account posted the claim?\nA2: @agwillliambarr - the account has been suspended as it is a parody account.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: This claim was made by a parody account. The account has been suspended, for fake news. \n\nverdict: 'Refuted'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: A ‘HUGE PERCENTAGE’ OF DEPORTED SALVADORANS KILLED OR HARMED UPON RETURN TO EL SALVADOR\n\nQ1: How many cases of El Salvadorian deportee deaths have been recorded\nA1: we identified or investigated 138 cases of Salvadorans killed since 2013 after deportation from the US\n\nQ2: How many El Salvadorians have been deported on record\nA2: Between 2014-2018, the US and Mexico have deported about 213,000 Salvadorans (102,000 from Mexico and 111,000 from the United States).",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: It seems that according to source information that the \"huge\" percentage has been exaggerated.\n\nverdict: 'Refuted'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: Sen. Chuck Schumer deleted a tweet criticizing President Donald Trump’s decision to ban some forms of travel to and from China.\n\nQ1: Did Sen. Chuck Schumer criticize President Donald Trump’s decision to ban some forms of travel to and from China on Twitter?\nA1: No, because This @SenSchumer tweet screenshot appears to be a fake: https://projects.propublica.org/politwoops/user/SenSchumer\n\nWant to see if a politician deleted a tweet? We have a partnership with \n@politwoops\n that allows you to see that information (details here:https://blog.twitter.com/en_us/a/2015/holding-public-officials-accountable-with-twitter-and-politwoops.html)\n\nQ2: Is there any record of this tweet in the senate's deleted tweets?\nA2: the statement does not appear in ProPublica’s archive of the Senate minority leader’s deleted tweets on Feb. 5 or any other date. Vijaya Gadde, the global lead for legal, policy and trust and safety at Twitter, noted it appeared to be fake on Feb. 28.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: Tweet came from a fake account \n\nverdict: 'Refuted'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: President Donald Trump will protect patients with pre-existing conditions.\n\nQ1: When was the Affordable Care Act passed in the U.S.?\nA1: On March 23, 2010\n\nQ2: Who signed the Affordable Care Act passed in the U.S.?\nA2: President Obama signed the Affordable Care Act.\n\nQ3: Does President Donald Trump support the ACA?\nA3: President Trump’s priorities for domestic policy are the repeal of the Affordable Care Act (also known as Obamacare).\n\nQ4: Does President Donald Trump support protecting patients with pre-existing conditions?\nA4: There's currently a Republican lawsuit pending in federal court that's trying to tear down the ACA's existing protections for those pre-existing conditions.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: A republican lawsuit is ongoing to tear down the protection for patients with pre-existing conditions \n\nverdict: 'Refuted'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: In America, we are spending twice as much on health care as the people of Canada or any other major countries\n\nQ1: How does health spending in the U.S. compare to Canada?\nA1: US Health consumption expenditures per capita, U.S. dollars, PPP adjusted, 2019 = $10,966\n\nCanada Health consumption expenditures per capita, U.S. dollars, PPP adjusted, 2019 = $5,418\n\n(Just over more than double)",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: The source shows that America spends on health are more than double than other comparable countries so the claim is supported.\n\nverdict: 'Supported'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: Two racist black thugs in Brunswick, Georgia, shot a white baby in the face for fun.\n\nQ1: Was a baby reportedly shot in the face by thugs due to the colour of his skin in Brunswick, Georgia?\nA1: No, because Police say the motive for Elkins’ shooting was simply that his mother, Sherry West, did not produce cash immediately when she was held up while returning with the child from the post office. West told investigators that a gunman demanded cash and shot her baby in the face after she told him she had none.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: The answer and source show that a baby was murdered but it was because the babies mother did not give the accused money so the claim is refuted.\n\nverdict: 'Refuted'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: Cannabis Boosts immunity against Novel Coronavirus\n\nQ1: is there any evidence that cannabis could provide any immunity against coronovirus?\nA1: No, because The video in question talks about the health benefits of cannabis but does not mention COVID in this",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: No evidence found in the source. (link not working!)\n\nverdict: 'Refuted'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: Three people have more wealth than the bottom half of American society\n\nQ1: What is the total wealth of the bottom half of Americans?\nA1: The bottom half of USA have a combined wealth of $245 billion\n\nQ2: Who are the 3 richest people in USA?\nA2: The study of the forbes 400 rich list found that the three wealthiest individuals were Bill Gates of Microsoft with $89 billion, Jeff Bezos of Amazon with $81.5 billion and Warren Buffett of Berkshire Hathaway with $78 billion.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: This claim is supported. According to the QA pairs, the 3 richest people- Bill Gates of Microsoft with $89 billion, Jeff Bezos of Amazon with $81.5 billion and Warren Buffett of Berkshire Hathaway with $78 billion- do have a combined wealth higher than the bottom half of American society. This combined wealth is $248.5 million. The bottom half of USA has a combined wealth of $245 billion. Therefore, this claim is supported. \n\nverdict: 'Supported'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: In eight years under the President Barack Obama administration, over 300,000 working-age people dropped out of the workforce.\n\nQ1: Is the claim of Trump correct that 300,000 people left jobs in 8 yrs and 3.5 billion joined under his govt. ?\nA1: Trump is being misleading with numbers to tarnish his predecessor’s record. It’s not clear what he means by “working-age.” But the total size of the U.S. labor force shows that the president is just wrong.During the eight years of Obama’s presidency, the labor force rose by 5.06 million, according to the Labor Department. The improvement reflected a rebounding economy from the Great Recession and population growth.\n\nAs the unemployment rate has fallen, more people are finding it attractive to work and joining the labor force. This has enabled the labor force to climb by an impressive 4.86 million in just three years under Trump.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: The claim is refuted, according to the QA pairs the labor force actually rose by 5.06 million during Obamas Presidency which is a statistic taken from the Labor department.\n\nverdict: 'Refuted'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: Traditionally, the Speaker says: ‘Members of Congress, I have the high privilege and distinct honor of presenting to you the President of the United States.’ (Tonight) Speaker Pelosi said, ‘Members of Congress, the President of the United States.’\n\nQ1: How was Trump introduced by the speaker in 2019\nA1: Trump breaks with tradition, doesn't wait for Pelosi to start speech\n\nQ2: How did Speaker Nancy Pelosi introduce Donald Trump in 2020\nA2: No answer could be found.\n\nQ3: How have past Presidents been introduced by Speakers of the House\nA3: As per custom Speaker Ryan Introduced Trump in 2018 with the phrase, \"Members of Congress, I have the high privilege and the distinct honor of presenting to you the president of the United States.\"\n\nQ4: Going back the last few years, when did speaker-president interactions address, \"\"Members of Congress, I have the high privilege and the distinct honor of presenting to you the president of the United States.\"\nA4: Between 2007 to 2018 every speaker said something very close to this.\n\nQ5: Was this said to Trump in the past?\nA5: Yes, because in 2017 and 2018, Ryan said introduced trump with \"\"Members of Congress, I have the high privilege and the distinct honor of presenting to you the president of the United States.\"",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: From the Q&As it seems that this was said by Pelosi. So the claim is supported. \n\nverdict: 'Supported'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: Over 130 legislators in the USA have endorsed legislation that would bankrupt our nation by providing free taxpayer-funded health care to millions of illegal aliens, forcing taxpayers to subsidize free care for anyone in the world who unlawfully crosses our borders.\n\nQ1: What legislation does the claim refer to?\nA1: Medicare for All in the u.S.\n\nQ2: Would Medicare for all risk bankrupting the U.S?\nA2: No, because A study of Medicare for All from the libertarian-oriented Mercatus Center at George Mason University put the cost at more than $32 trillion over 10 years.\n\nQ3: Does Medicaid cover illegal immigrants in the U.S?\nA3: No, because Federal law generally bars illegal immigrants from being covered by Medicaid. But a little-known part of the state-federal health insurance program for the poor has long paid about $2 billion a year for emergency treatment for a group of patients who, according to hospitals, mostly comprise illegal immigrants.\n\nQ4: Did legislators vote for Medicare for all?\nA4: 17 Democratic senators backed the’ Medicare for All bill. In the House, 125 members signed on",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: Federal law generally bars illegal immigrants from being covered by Medicaid.\n\nverdict: 'Refuted'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: Nigeria is one of the Freest Countries for the Press and Media\n\nQ1: Is there freedom for the press and media in Nigeria\nA1: There have been about 448 total reports on recorded assaults on journalists\n\nQ2: What is Nigeria's stance on press and media\nA2: In Nigeria, the civic space continues to shrink. Nigerian authorities have carried out consistent attack on journalists and media activists through verbal and physical assault, indiscriminate arrest, torture, detention, prosecution through trumped-up charges and abuse of the Cybercrime and Terrorism laws",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: There are reports of attacks on journalists, it doesn't seem to be the freest.\n\nverdict: 'Refuted'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: Sex traffickers are leaving $100 bills, laced with a debilitating substance attached to the handles of parked cars at Northgate Mall in Revere, Massachusetts.\n\nQ1: Are sex traffickers placing $100 bills laced with a debilitating substance on the handles of parked cars at Revere's Northgate Mall?\nA1: “This is not true,” Captain Amy O’Hara, a spokeswoman for the Revere Police Department",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: A spokeswoman for the Revere Police Department has directly addressed the claims and said that the claims are not true so it is refuted.\n\nverdict: 'Refuted'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: The UK has taken in 41,000 unaccompanied children since 2010.\n\nQ1: How many asylum seekers and refugees under the age of 18 has the UK taken in since 2010?\nA1: 41,396 asylum seekers and refugees under the age of 18 were granted leave to remain in the UK between 2010-2019.\n\nQ2: How many of the 41,396 asylum seekers and refugees under the age of 18 were unaccompanied?\nA2: 11,338 (27%) were unaccompanied.\n\nQ3: How many of the 41,396 asylum seekers and refugees under the age of 18 were accompanied?\nA3: 16,671 (40%) were accompanied.\n\nQ4: Were the remaining 13,387 young people unaccompanied?\nA4: There is no information given to indicate whether the remaining young people were unaccompanied or not",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: The second answer shows that the number is incorrect \n\nverdict: 'Refuted'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: Sri Lanka is the first country in the world to completely eradicate the coronavirus.\n\nQ1: Has any country successfully eradicated the novel coronavirus\nA1: No answer could be found.\n\nQ2: Has Sri Lanka eradicated the novel coronavirus\nA2: There is no evidence of Sri Lanka having eradicated the virus",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: No evidence that Sri Lanka or any other country has successfully eradicated COVID-19. \n\nverdict: 'Refuted'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: As of 2019, unemployment in the US, is at a 49-year low, under the Trump-led administration\n\nQ1: What was the unemployment rate in the united states in 2019?\nA1: Data from the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis show that the unemployment rate was 3.5% in December 2019, the latest month it has numbers for.\n\nQ2: What is the lowest unemployment has been, prior to this, in the last 49 years?\nA2: It was as low as 4% for a few months in 2000",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: This claim seems correct with source given\n\nverdict: 'Supported'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: American workers are seeing the “best wage growth in a decade,” under the Trump administration\n\nQ1: When did the Trump administration take office?\nA1: On November 8, 2016, Trump was elected President. He was inaugurated as the 45th President of the United States on January 20, 2017.\n\nQ2: How did the workers wage growth perform between 2017 and the time of the claim?\nA2: There is an increase in the Median usual weekly real earnings for workers between 2017 and 2020.\n\nQ3: Did American workers see the best wage growth in a decade under the Trump administration ?\nA3: No, During Barack Obama (April 2014 - April 2017) wages grew by about 6.9%, while in comparison the change in wages between October 2017 - October 2019 was about 4.9%",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: During Barack Obama (April 2014 - April 2017) wages grew by about 6.9%, while in comparison the change in wages between October 2017 - October 2019 was about 4.9%\n\nverdict: 'Refuted'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: Under a COVID-19 financial relief scheme called Rashtriya Shikshit Berojgar Yojana, the Government of India will provide financial aid of Rs 50,000 to ration cardholders.\n\nQ1: What records show the existence of the Rashtriya Swasthya Bima Yojna in the Indian government's directory\nA1: Searching the website shows no record of such a scheme\n\nQ2: What is the source of the claim\nA2: rsby.org\n\nQ3: What are the national health schemes introduced by the Indian government\nA3: National Health Insurance Schemes include \nRashtiya Swasthiya Bima Yojana (RSBY)\nEmployment State Insurance Scheme (ESIS)\nCentral Government Health Scheme (CGHS)\nAam Aadmi Bima Yojana (AABY)\nJanashree Bima Yojana (JBY)\nUniversal Health Insurance Scheme (UHIS)\n\nQ4: How much are people entitled to in the RSBY scheme\nA4: The objective of RSBY is to provide protection to BPL households from financial liabilities arising out of health shocks that involve hospitalization. Beneficiaries under RSBY are entitled to hospitalization coverage up to Rs. 30,000/- for most of the diseases that require hospitalization",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: Although there is a similar named National Health Insurance Scheme called Rashtiya Swasthiya Bima Yojana (RSBY) - it's benefits are for health Beneficiaries under RSBY are entitled to hospitalization coverage up to Rs. 30,000/- for most of the diseases that require hospitalization. There is no COVID-19 financial relief scheme called Rashtriya Shikshit Berojgar Yojana. \n\nverdict: 'Refuted'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: Dr. Charles Lieber, chair of Harvard University’s Dept of Chemistry and Chemical Biology and two Chinese students were arrested for creating the COVID-19 virus.\n\nQ1: Was Dr. Charles Lieber and two Chinese students arrested for creating the COVID-19 virus?\nA1: A Harvard University department chair and two Chinese nationals who were researchers at Boston University and a Boston hospital were charged on Tuesday with lying about their alleged links to the Chinese government.\n\nQ2: What was Dr. Charles Lieber found guilty of ?\nA2: This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.\nArticle content\n\nLieber was charged with one count of making false statements to a U.S. government agency. Bonavolonta said investigators were trying to determine if anything other than money motivated his actions.\n\nHarvard and Boston University said they were cooperating with investigators.\n\n“The charges brought by the U.S. government against Professor Lieber are extremely serious,” Harvard said in a statement.\n\nLieber was arrested on Tuesday. Efforts to reach him were unsuccessful.\n\nBeth Israel officials did not respond to requests for comment, nor did China’s embassy in Washington.\n\nSAFEGUARD THE SCIENCE\n\nJohn Demers, assistant attorney general for national security, said U.S. universities need to increase their vigilance when it comes to connections to China.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: They are arrested not for creating the COVID-19 virus but for their alleged links to the Chinese government\n\n\nverdict: 'Refuted'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: NZ cricket captain said \" I request to NZ government please cancel KL Rahul's visa immediately.\"\n\nQ1: Did The new zealand cricket captain, kane Williamson's say this?\nA1: There is no evidence of him saying this on any of his social media handles or google.\n\nQ2: Did the New Zealand cricket captain Kane Williamson say what is stated in the claim?\nA2: There is no evidence of him saying this on any of his social media handles or google.\n\nQ3: Where did the claim originate from?\nA3: An instagram post.\n\nQ4: Is the claim origin a credible account?\nA4: No, because It seems to be a meme account about cricket.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: It seems that the NZ cricket captain never said this claim, therefore the label is refuted\n\nverdict: 'Refuted'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: World Health Organisation reports 340,000 people infected with Coronavirus in China.\n\nQ1: When was this claim made?\nA1: 31/01/2020\n\nQ2: How many cases of coronavirus had been confirmed on 31/01/2020?\nA2: 17,391as of 03/02/2020\n\nQ3: How many cases of Coronavirus were confirmed in China as of 31/01/2020?\nA3: 17,238 as of 03/02/2020",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: There were only 17,391 confirmed cases in China on this date.\n\nverdict: 'Refuted'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: World Health Organisation reports 75,000 people have been killed by the 2019 Novel Coronavirus in China.\n\nQ1: At January 2020 how many people in China had died as a result of the 2019 Novel Coronavirus ?\nA1: 361 recorded deaths in China as at 3rd February 2020.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: There was only 361 recorded deaths in China as of 3 feb, 2020 - not 75,000. \n\nverdict: 'Refuted'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: World Health Organisation labels Coronavirus a plague.\n\nQ1: Does Who label Covid-19 as a plague?\nA1: No the definition of a plague by WHO is a specific infectious disease caused by a bacteria called Yersinia pestis. The bacteria is usually found in small mammals and their fleas and can be transmitted between animals and humans by the bite of infected fleas, direct contact with infected tissue or inhalation of infected respiratory droplets.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: The source shows what the WHO regards as a plague and covid is not mentioned on that page so the claim is refuted.\n\nverdict: 'Refuted'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: The EU did not help Britain during the Falklands War, and instead sent weapons to Argentina.\n\nQ1: When was the Falklands war\nA1: On 2 April 1982, Argentina invaded the Falkland Islands, a remote British colony in the South Atlantic – sparking a short and decisive war that grabbed international headlines, created sizeable politicial drama, and involved great bravery and great tragedy.\n\nQ2: When was the EU formed\nA2: European Union (EU), Organization of European countries, formed in 1993 to oversee their economic and political integration. It was created by the Maastricht Treaty and ratified by all members of the European Community (EC), out of which the EU developed\n\nQ3: What was the EC's stance on during the Falklands war\nA3: They placed a ban on the importation activities in Argentina and condemned the acts of violence",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: The 2nd Q&A pair points out that the EU had not formed at the time of the war shown in Q&A 1, and was called the EC, so the EU could not have interfered as stated in the claim.\nQ&A 3 states that EC saw Argentina as the aggressor and placed import bans on them so this refutes the claim part that says they gave weapons to Argentina.\n\nverdict: 'Refuted'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: Weapons seized from a West Bengal madrassa.\n\nQ1: Were weapons seized from a West Bengal madrassa?\nA1: No, because There has been a stir after a large quantity of illegal arms and cartridges were recovered in Sherkot Madrasa in Bijnor, UP. Since then, the police and the country's internal intelligence agency Intelligence Bureau (IB) have started investigating. \n\nPolice started investigation by taking 6 people into custody in this case and search is on for two suspects. But the question is now arising whether terror is being taught in madrassas of UP. A few days ago it was alleged that terror training is being given in madrassas of West Bengal and now an arms factory has been found in a madrasa here.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: The claim lists a specific location for a weapon seizure, However Q&A 1 state this happened in a completely different location.\n\nverdict: 'Refuted'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: The fatality rate stood at 17.40% for H1N1 compared to 2% for the ongoing coronavirus outbreak.\n\nQ1: Where was this claim published?\nA1: Business Insider\n\nQ2: Did the report show deaths from H1N1 as 17.4% and Covid-19 as 2.1%?\nA2: The original report has been amended:-\n\nCorrection: A previous version of the chart in this article incorrectly reported the case-fatality rate of H1N1. It is 0.02%.\n\nQ3: What is H1N1?\nA3: The 2009 H1N1 virus, called swine flu because the virus likely originated in pigs and contained genes from multiple strains of swine influenza viruses, first broke out in Mexico and subsequently spread to the United States and other countries around the world. In addition to the genes from different swine influenza viruses, the H1N1 virus that caused the outbreak was found to contain genetic material from human and avian influenza viruses as well. Thus, the virus is believed to have evolved through genetic reassortment that was presumed to have occurred in pigs.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: the figure was quoted incorrectly, and has been changed. \n\nverdict: 'Refuted'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: A Colorado school forces students to wear hijabs.\n\nQ1: Does Rocky Heights Middle School in Douglas County US have a student dress code?\nA1: Yes, because The school lists its dress code on its official web site.\n\nQ2: Who decides what a student can wear at Rocky heights middle school in Douglas County in the US.\nA2: The schools dress code states that dress choices are parent’s and students responsibility",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: Although the school has a dress code - the dress code is are parent’s and students responsibility.\n\nverdict: 'Refuted'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: World Health Organization officially declares the Coronavirus as a plague.\n\nQ1: What is plague?\nA1: Key facts\nPlague is caused by the bacteria Yersinia pestis, a zoonotic bacteria usually found in small mammals and their fleas.\nPeople infected with Y. pestis often develop symptoms after an incubation period of one to seven days.\nThere are two main clinical forms of plague infection: bubonic and pneumonic. Bubonic plague is the most common form and is characterized by painful swollen lymph nodes or 'buboes'.\nPlague is transmitted between animals and humans by the bite of infected fleas, direct contact with infected tissues, and inhalation of infected respiratory droplets.\nPlague can be a very severe disease in people, with a case-fatality ratio of 30% to 60% for the bubonic type, and is always fatal for the pneumonic kind when left untreated.\nAntibiotic treatment is effective against plague bacteria, so early diagnosis and early treatment can save lives.\nFrom 2010 to 2015 there were 3248 cases reported worldwide, including 584 deaths.\nCurrently, the three most endemic countries are the Democratic Republic of the Congo, Madagascar, and Peru.\nPlague is an infectious disease caused by the bacteria Yersinia pestis, a zoonotic bacteria, usually found in small mammals and their fleas. It is transmitted between animals through fleas. Humans can be infected through:\nthe bite of infected vector fleas\nunprotected contact with infectious bodily fluids or contaminated materials\nthe inhalation of respiratory droplets/small particles from a patient with pneumonic plague.\n\nQ2: What is coronavirus?\nA2: Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) is an infectious disease caused by the SARS-CoV-2 virus.\n\nQ3: What was the declaration made by WHO on 30/01/2020?\nA3: The World Health Organization on Thursday declared the outbreak of a novel coronavirus a global health emergency, an acknowledgement of the risk the virus poses to countries beyond its origin in China and of the need for a more coordinated international response to the outbreak.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: The answer and credible source show that the WHO do not call the covid virus a plague so the claim is refuted.\n\nverdict: 'Refuted'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: Under three years of Donald Trumps administration, net farm income has already gone up nearly 50%.\n\nQ1: Who collects information about the U.S farms economic data?\nA1: The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA)\n\nQ2: Does USDA data show a 50% increase in net farm income from 2017?\nA2: According to that USDA data, farm net income increased 50% from 2016, through 2020,\n\nQ3: What years was Donald Trump president?\nA3: 2016 to 2020",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: It seems from the 2bd and 3rd QA that the claim is supported \n\nverdict: 'Supported'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: The Delhi Police in India is being slammed for their apparent inaction when a man was shot at Jamia Millia Islamia University\n\nQ1: Did the police react to the shooting ?\nA1: Standard protocols dealing with an active shooter were followed. Several videos have surfaced which shows the Delhi Police did apprehend the man after they were made aware that he was carrying a weapon. While analyzing the video, at the 14th second, it can be seen that the police sneak up behind him and catches hold of him. The Police are being warned that the man is carrying a pistol. The video clearly shows that the man was seized as soon as he fired a shot. Further, police are mandated to follow standard protocols when dealing with an active shooter. In the face of a man holding a weapon at a crowded place like a university, it becomes all the more necessary to follow these protocols precisely. This would ensure that the situation doesn't get out of hand, and the shooter does not get agitated. Police officers responding to an active shooter are trained in a procedure known as Rapid Deployment and are supposed to proceed immediately to the area in which shots were last heard; their purpose is to stop the shooting as quickly as possible. The first responding officers will normally be in teams of four (4); they may be dressed in regular patrol uniforms, or they may be wearing external bulletproof vests, Kevlar helmets, and other tactical equipment. The officers may be armed with rifles, shotguns, or handguns, and might also be using pepper spray or tear gas to control the situation. There's nothing safe about a single officer running to confront a potential murderer or a terrorist",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: Evidence shows that the Delhi Police did apprehend the man after they were made aware that he was carrying a weapon. Video evidence shows that at the 14th second, it can be seen that the police sneak up behind him and catch hold of him. Hence, the claim is refuted.\n\nverdict: 'Refuted'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: CHUCK SCHUMER SAY ‘IT’S RACIST TO ONLY ALLOW CITIZENS TO VOTE’\n\nQ1: What did Schumer say in the 2017 article that the claim is based on?\nA1: Schumer described the commission as an “effort to intimidate voters and purge them from the rolls through a national voter database of personal information” that disenfranchises minority voters.\n\nQ2: Has Chuck Schumer ever said It’s racist to only allow citizens to vote?\nA2: No answer could be found.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: Evidence does not show that Chuck Schumer said, \"It’s racist to only allow citizens to vote.\" In the article on which the claim is based, Schumer describes the commission as an \"effort to intimidate voters and purge them from the rolls through a national voter database of personal information\" that disenfranchises minority voters. Hence, the quote in the claim is refuted.\n\nverdict: 'Refuted'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
Subsets and Splits
No saved queries yet
Save your SQL queries to embed, download, and access them later. Queries will appear here once saved.