<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street, and officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene, therefore the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
stringlengths 355
1.02k
|
|---|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the robbery occurred at 8:45 p.m then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, so the robbery did not occur at 8:45 p.m.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the robbery occurred at 8:45 p.m then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The robbery did not occur at 8:45 p.m
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the robbery occurred at 8:45 p.m then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which implies that the robbery did not occur at 8:45 p.m.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the robbery occurred at 8:45 p.m then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The robbery did not occur at 8:45 p.m
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the robbery occurred at 8:45 p.m then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which shows that the robbery did not occur at 8:45 p.m.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the robbery occurred at 8:45 p.m then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The robbery did not occur at 8:45 p.m
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the robbery occurred at 8:45 p.m then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which establishes that the robbery did not occur at 8:45 p.m.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the robbery occurred at 8:45 p.m then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The robbery did not occur at 8:45 p.m
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The robbery did not occur at 8:45 p.m, since if the robbery occurred at 8:45 p.m then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the robbery occurred at 8:45 p.m then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The robbery did not occur at 8:45 p.m
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The robbery did not occur at 8:45 p.m, because if the robbery occurred at 8:45 p.m then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the robbery occurred at 8:45 p.m then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The robbery did not occur at 8:45 p.m
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The robbery did not occur at 8:45 p.m, as if the robbery occurred at 8:45 p.m then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the robbery occurred at 8:45 p.m then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The robbery did not occur at 8:45 p.m
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If officer smith discovered a broken window at the jewelry store then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and officer smith discovered a broken window at the jewelry store, therefore the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If officer smith discovered a broken window at the jewelry store then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Officer smith discovered a broken window at the jewelry store
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If officer smith discovered a broken window at the jewelry store then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and officer smith discovered a broken window at the jewelry store, hence the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If officer smith discovered a broken window at the jewelry store then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Officer smith discovered a broken window at the jewelry store
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If officer smith discovered a broken window at the jewelry store then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and officer smith discovered a broken window at the jewelry store, thus the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If officer smith discovered a broken window at the jewelry store then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Officer smith discovered a broken window at the jewelry store
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If officer smith discovered a broken window at the jewelry store then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and officer smith discovered a broken window at the jewelry store, so it can be concluded that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If officer smith discovered a broken window at the jewelry store then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Officer smith discovered a broken window at the jewelry store
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If officer smith discovered a broken window at the jewelry store then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and officer smith discovered a broken window at the jewelry store, so the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If officer smith discovered a broken window at the jewelry store then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Officer smith discovered a broken window at the jewelry store
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If officer smith discovered a broken window at the jewelry store then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and officer smith discovered a broken window at the jewelry store, which implies that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If officer smith discovered a broken window at the jewelry store then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Officer smith discovered a broken window at the jewelry store
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If officer smith discovered a broken window at the jewelry store then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and officer smith discovered a broken window at the jewelry store, which shows that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If officer smith discovered a broken window at the jewelry store then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Officer smith discovered a broken window at the jewelry store
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If officer smith discovered a broken window at the jewelry store then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and officer smith discovered a broken window at the jewelry store, which establishes that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If officer smith discovered a broken window at the jewelry store then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Officer smith discovered a broken window at the jewelry store
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, since if officer smith discovered a broken window at the jewelry store then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and officer smith discovered a broken window at the jewelry store.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If officer smith discovered a broken window at the jewelry store then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Officer smith discovered a broken window at the jewelry store
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, because if officer smith discovered a broken window at the jewelry store then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and officer smith discovered a broken window at the jewelry store.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If officer smith discovered a broken window at the jewelry store then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Officer smith discovered a broken window at the jewelry store
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, as if officer smith discovered a broken window at the jewelry store then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and officer smith discovered a broken window at the jewelry store.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If officer smith discovered a broken window at the jewelry store then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Officer smith discovered a broken window at the jewelry store
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If officer smith discovered a broken window at the jewelry store then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, therefore officer smith did not discover a broken window at the jewelry store.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If officer smith discovered a broken window at the jewelry store then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Officer Smith did not discover a broken window at the jewelry store
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If officer smith discovered a broken window at the jewelry store then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, hence officer smith did not discover a broken window at the jewelry store.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If officer smith discovered a broken window at the jewelry store then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Officer Smith did not discover a broken window at the jewelry store
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If officer smith discovered a broken window at the jewelry store then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, thus officer smith did not discover a broken window at the jewelry store.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If officer smith discovered a broken window at the jewelry store then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Officer Smith did not discover a broken window at the jewelry store
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If officer smith discovered a broken window at the jewelry store then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, so it can be concluded that officer smith did not discover a broken window at the jewelry store.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If officer smith discovered a broken window at the jewelry store then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Officer Smith did not discover a broken window at the jewelry store
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If officer smith discovered a broken window at the jewelry store then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, so officer smith did not discover a broken window at the jewelry store.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If officer smith discovered a broken window at the jewelry store then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Officer Smith did not discover a broken window at the jewelry store
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If officer smith discovered a broken window at the jewelry store then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which implies that officer smith did not discover a broken window at the jewelry store.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If officer smith discovered a broken window at the jewelry store then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Officer Smith did not discover a broken window at the jewelry store
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If officer smith discovered a broken window at the jewelry store then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which shows that officer smith did not discover a broken window at the jewelry store.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If officer smith discovered a broken window at the jewelry store then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Officer Smith did not discover a broken window at the jewelry store
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If officer smith discovered a broken window at the jewelry store then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which establishes that officer smith did not discover a broken window at the jewelry store.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If officer smith discovered a broken window at the jewelry store then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Officer Smith did not discover a broken window at the jewelry store
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```Officer smith did not discover a broken window at the jewelry store, since if officer smith discovered a broken window at the jewelry store then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If officer smith discovered a broken window at the jewelry store then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Officer Smith did not discover a broken window at the jewelry store
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```Officer smith did not discover a broken window at the jewelry store, because if officer smith discovered a broken window at the jewelry store then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If officer smith discovered a broken window at the jewelry store then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Officer Smith did not discover a broken window at the jewelry store
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```Officer smith did not discover a broken window at the jewelry store, as if officer smith discovered a broken window at the jewelry store then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If officer smith discovered a broken window at the jewelry store then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Officer Smith did not discover a broken window at the jewelry store
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a stolen car was found abandoned near the crime scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a stolen car was found abandoned near the crime scene, therefore the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a stolen car was found abandoned near the crime scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A stolen car was found abandoned near the crime scene
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a stolen car was found abandoned near the crime scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a stolen car was found abandoned near the crime scene, hence the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a stolen car was found abandoned near the crime scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A stolen car was found abandoned near the crime scene
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a stolen car was found abandoned near the crime scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a stolen car was found abandoned near the crime scene, thus the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a stolen car was found abandoned near the crime scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A stolen car was found abandoned near the crime scene
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a stolen car was found abandoned near the crime scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a stolen car was found abandoned near the crime scene, so it can be concluded that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a stolen car was found abandoned near the crime scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A stolen car was found abandoned near the crime scene
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a stolen car was found abandoned near the crime scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a stolen car was found abandoned near the crime scene, so the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a stolen car was found abandoned near the crime scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A stolen car was found abandoned near the crime scene
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a stolen car was found abandoned near the crime scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a stolen car was found abandoned near the crime scene, which implies that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a stolen car was found abandoned near the crime scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A stolen car was found abandoned near the crime scene
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a stolen car was found abandoned near the crime scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a stolen car was found abandoned near the crime scene, which shows that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a stolen car was found abandoned near the crime scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A stolen car was found abandoned near the crime scene
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a stolen car was found abandoned near the crime scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a stolen car was found abandoned near the crime scene, which establishes that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a stolen car was found abandoned near the crime scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A stolen car was found abandoned near the crime scene
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, since if a stolen car was found abandoned near the crime scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and a stolen car was found abandoned near the crime scene.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a stolen car was found abandoned near the crime scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A stolen car was found abandoned near the crime scene
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, because if a stolen car was found abandoned near the crime scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and a stolen car was found abandoned near the crime scene.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a stolen car was found abandoned near the crime scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A stolen car was found abandoned near the crime scene
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, as if a stolen car was found abandoned near the crime scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and a stolen car was found abandoned near the crime scene.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a stolen car was found abandoned near the crime scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A stolen car was found abandoned near the crime scene
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a stolen car was found abandoned near the crime scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, therefore a stolen car was not found abandoned near the crime scene.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a stolen car was found abandoned near the crime scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: A stolen car was not found abandoned near the crime scene
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a stolen car was found abandoned near the crime scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, hence a stolen car was not found abandoned near the crime scene.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a stolen car was found abandoned near the crime scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: A stolen car was not found abandoned near the crime scene
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a stolen car was found abandoned near the crime scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, thus a stolen car was not found abandoned near the crime scene.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a stolen car was found abandoned near the crime scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: A stolen car was not found abandoned near the crime scene
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a stolen car was found abandoned near the crime scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, so it can be concluded that a stolen car was not found abandoned near the crime scene.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a stolen car was found abandoned near the crime scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: A stolen car was not found abandoned near the crime scene
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a stolen car was found abandoned near the crime scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, so a stolen car was not found abandoned near the crime scene.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a stolen car was found abandoned near the crime scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: A stolen car was not found abandoned near the crime scene
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a stolen car was found abandoned near the crime scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which implies that a stolen car was not found abandoned near the crime scene.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a stolen car was found abandoned near the crime scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: A stolen car was not found abandoned near the crime scene
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a stolen car was found abandoned near the crime scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which shows that a stolen car was not found abandoned near the crime scene.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a stolen car was found abandoned near the crime scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: A stolen car was not found abandoned near the crime scene
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a stolen car was found abandoned near the crime scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which establishes that a stolen car was not found abandoned near the crime scene.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a stolen car was found abandoned near the crime scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: A stolen car was not found abandoned near the crime scene
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```A stolen car was not found abandoned near the crime scene, since if a stolen car was found abandoned near the crime scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a stolen car was found abandoned near the crime scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: A stolen car was not found abandoned near the crime scene
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```A stolen car was not found abandoned near the crime scene, because if a stolen car was found abandoned near the crime scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a stolen car was found abandoned near the crime scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: A stolen car was not found abandoned near the crime scene
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```A stolen car was not found abandoned near the crime scene, as if a stolen car was found abandoned near the crime scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a stolen car was found abandoned near the crime scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: A stolen car was not found abandoned near the crime scene
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If witness testimonies suggest two perpetrators in the jewelry heist then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and witness testimonies suggest two perpetrators in the jewelry heist, therefore the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If witness testimonies suggest two perpetrators in the jewelry heist then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Witness testimonies suggest two perpetrators in the jewelry heist
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If witness testimonies suggest two perpetrators in the jewelry heist then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and witness testimonies suggest two perpetrators in the jewelry heist, hence the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If witness testimonies suggest two perpetrators in the jewelry heist then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Witness testimonies suggest two perpetrators in the jewelry heist
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If witness testimonies suggest two perpetrators in the jewelry heist then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and witness testimonies suggest two perpetrators in the jewelry heist, thus the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If witness testimonies suggest two perpetrators in the jewelry heist then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Witness testimonies suggest two perpetrators in the jewelry heist
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If witness testimonies suggest two perpetrators in the jewelry heist then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and witness testimonies suggest two perpetrators in the jewelry heist, so it can be concluded that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If witness testimonies suggest two perpetrators in the jewelry heist then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Witness testimonies suggest two perpetrators in the jewelry heist
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If witness testimonies suggest two perpetrators in the jewelry heist then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and witness testimonies suggest two perpetrators in the jewelry heist, so the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If witness testimonies suggest two perpetrators in the jewelry heist then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Witness testimonies suggest two perpetrators in the jewelry heist
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If witness testimonies suggest two perpetrators in the jewelry heist then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and witness testimonies suggest two perpetrators in the jewelry heist, which implies that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If witness testimonies suggest two perpetrators in the jewelry heist then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Witness testimonies suggest two perpetrators in the jewelry heist
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If witness testimonies suggest two perpetrators in the jewelry heist then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and witness testimonies suggest two perpetrators in the jewelry heist, which shows that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If witness testimonies suggest two perpetrators in the jewelry heist then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Witness testimonies suggest two perpetrators in the jewelry heist
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If witness testimonies suggest two perpetrators in the jewelry heist then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and witness testimonies suggest two perpetrators in the jewelry heist, which establishes that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If witness testimonies suggest two perpetrators in the jewelry heist then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Witness testimonies suggest two perpetrators in the jewelry heist
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, since if witness testimonies suggest two perpetrators in the jewelry heist then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and witness testimonies suggest two perpetrators in the jewelry heist.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If witness testimonies suggest two perpetrators in the jewelry heist then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Witness testimonies suggest two perpetrators in the jewelry heist
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, because if witness testimonies suggest two perpetrators in the jewelry heist then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and witness testimonies suggest two perpetrators in the jewelry heist.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If witness testimonies suggest two perpetrators in the jewelry heist then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Witness testimonies suggest two perpetrators in the jewelry heist
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, as if witness testimonies suggest two perpetrators in the jewelry heist then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and witness testimonies suggest two perpetrators in the jewelry heist.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If witness testimonies suggest two perpetrators in the jewelry heist then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Witness testimonies suggest two perpetrators in the jewelry heist
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If witness testimonies suggest two perpetrators in the jewelry heist then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, therefore witness testimonies do not suggest two perpetrators in the jewelry heist.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If witness testimonies suggest two perpetrators in the jewelry heist then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Witness testimonies do not suggest two perpetrators in the jewelry heist
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If witness testimonies suggest two perpetrators in the jewelry heist then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, hence witness testimonies do not suggest two perpetrators in the jewelry heist.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If witness testimonies suggest two perpetrators in the jewelry heist then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Witness testimonies do not suggest two perpetrators in the jewelry heist
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If witness testimonies suggest two perpetrators in the jewelry heist then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, thus witness testimonies do not suggest two perpetrators in the jewelry heist.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If witness testimonies suggest two perpetrators in the jewelry heist then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Witness testimonies do not suggest two perpetrators in the jewelry heist
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If witness testimonies suggest two perpetrators in the jewelry heist then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, so it can be concluded that witness testimonies do not suggest two perpetrators in the jewelry heist.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If witness testimonies suggest two perpetrators in the jewelry heist then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Witness testimonies do not suggest two perpetrators in the jewelry heist
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If witness testimonies suggest two perpetrators in the jewelry heist then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, so witness testimonies do not suggest two perpetrators in the jewelry heist.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If witness testimonies suggest two perpetrators in the jewelry heist then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Witness testimonies do not suggest two perpetrators in the jewelry heist
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If witness testimonies suggest two perpetrators in the jewelry heist then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which implies that witness testimonies do not suggest two perpetrators in the jewelry heist.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If witness testimonies suggest two perpetrators in the jewelry heist then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Witness testimonies do not suggest two perpetrators in the jewelry heist
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If witness testimonies suggest two perpetrators in the jewelry heist then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which shows that witness testimonies do not suggest two perpetrators in the jewelry heist.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If witness testimonies suggest two perpetrators in the jewelry heist then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Witness testimonies do not suggest two perpetrators in the jewelry heist
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If witness testimonies suggest two perpetrators in the jewelry heist then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which establishes that witness testimonies do not suggest two perpetrators in the jewelry heist.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If witness testimonies suggest two perpetrators in the jewelry heist then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Witness testimonies do not suggest two perpetrators in the jewelry heist
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```Witness testimonies do not suggest two perpetrators in the jewelry heist, since if witness testimonies suggest two perpetrators in the jewelry heist then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If witness testimonies suggest two perpetrators in the jewelry heist then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Witness testimonies do not suggest two perpetrators in the jewelry heist
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```Witness testimonies do not suggest two perpetrators in the jewelry heist, because if witness testimonies suggest two perpetrators in the jewelry heist then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If witness testimonies suggest two perpetrators in the jewelry heist then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Witness testimonies do not suggest two perpetrators in the jewelry heist
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```Witness testimonies do not suggest two perpetrators in the jewelry heist, as if witness testimonies suggest two perpetrators in the jewelry heist then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If witness testimonies suggest two perpetrators in the jewelry heist then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Witness testimonies do not suggest two perpetrators in the jewelry heist
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If detective parker received an anonymous tip about the suspects then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and detective parker received an anonymous tip about the suspects, therefore the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If detective parker received an anonymous tip about the suspects then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Detective parker received an anonymous tip about the suspects
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If detective parker received an anonymous tip about the suspects then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and detective parker received an anonymous tip about the suspects, hence the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If detective parker received an anonymous tip about the suspects then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Detective parker received an anonymous tip about the suspects
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If detective parker received an anonymous tip about the suspects then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and detective parker received an anonymous tip about the suspects, thus the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If detective parker received an anonymous tip about the suspects then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Detective parker received an anonymous tip about the suspects
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If detective parker received an anonymous tip about the suspects then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and detective parker received an anonymous tip about the suspects, so it can be concluded that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If detective parker received an anonymous tip about the suspects then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Detective parker received an anonymous tip about the suspects
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If detective parker received an anonymous tip about the suspects then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and detective parker received an anonymous tip about the suspects, so the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If detective parker received an anonymous tip about the suspects then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Detective parker received an anonymous tip about the suspects
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If detective parker received an anonymous tip about the suspects then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and detective parker received an anonymous tip about the suspects, which implies that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If detective parker received an anonymous tip about the suspects then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Detective parker received an anonymous tip about the suspects
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If detective parker received an anonymous tip about the suspects then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and detective parker received an anonymous tip about the suspects, which shows that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If detective parker received an anonymous tip about the suspects then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Detective parker received an anonymous tip about the suspects
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If detective parker received an anonymous tip about the suspects then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and detective parker received an anonymous tip about the suspects, which establishes that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If detective parker received an anonymous tip about the suspects then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Detective parker received an anonymous tip about the suspects
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, since if detective parker received an anonymous tip about the suspects then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and detective parker received an anonymous tip about the suspects.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If detective parker received an anonymous tip about the suspects then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Detective parker received an anonymous tip about the suspects
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, because if detective parker received an anonymous tip about the suspects then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and detective parker received an anonymous tip about the suspects.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If detective parker received an anonymous tip about the suspects then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Detective parker received an anonymous tip about the suspects
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, as if detective parker received an anonymous tip about the suspects then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and detective parker received an anonymous tip about the suspects.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If detective parker received an anonymous tip about the suspects then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Detective parker received an anonymous tip about the suspects
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If detective parker received an anonymous tip about the suspects then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, therefore detective parker did not receive an anonymous tip about the suspects.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If detective parker received an anonymous tip about the suspects then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Detective Parker did not receive an anonymous tip about the suspects
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If detective parker received an anonymous tip about the suspects then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, hence detective parker did not receive an anonymous tip about the suspects.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If detective parker received an anonymous tip about the suspects then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Detective Parker did not receive an anonymous tip about the suspects
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If detective parker received an anonymous tip about the suspects then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, thus detective parker did not receive an anonymous tip about the suspects.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If detective parker received an anonymous tip about the suspects then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Detective Parker did not receive an anonymous tip about the suspects
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If detective parker received an anonymous tip about the suspects then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, so it can be concluded that detective parker did not receive an anonymous tip about the suspects.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If detective parker received an anonymous tip about the suspects then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Detective Parker did not receive an anonymous tip about the suspects
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If detective parker received an anonymous tip about the suspects then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, so detective parker did not receive an anonymous tip about the suspects.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If detective parker received an anonymous tip about the suspects then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Detective Parker did not receive an anonymous tip about the suspects
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If detective parker received an anonymous tip about the suspects then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which implies that detective parker did not receive an anonymous tip about the suspects.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If detective parker received an anonymous tip about the suspects then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Detective Parker did not receive an anonymous tip about the suspects
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If detective parker received an anonymous tip about the suspects then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which shows that detective parker did not receive an anonymous tip about the suspects.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If detective parker received an anonymous tip about the suspects then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Detective Parker did not receive an anonymous tip about the suspects
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If detective parker received an anonymous tip about the suspects then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which establishes that detective parker did not receive an anonymous tip about the suspects.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If detective parker received an anonymous tip about the suspects then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Detective Parker did not receive an anonymous tip about the suspects
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```Detective parker did not receive an anonymous tip about the suspects, since if detective parker received an anonymous tip about the suspects then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If detective parker received an anonymous tip about the suspects then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Detective Parker did not receive an anonymous tip about the suspects
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```Detective parker did not receive an anonymous tip about the suspects, because if detective parker received an anonymous tip about the suspects then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If detective parker received an anonymous tip about the suspects then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Detective Parker did not receive an anonymous tip about the suspects
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```Detective parker did not receive an anonymous tip about the suspects, as if detective parker received an anonymous tip about the suspects then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If detective parker received an anonymous tip about the suspects then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Detective Parker did not receive an anonymous tip about the suspects
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a security camera captured a man wearing a clown mask fleeing the scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a security camera captured a man wearing a clown mask fleeing the scene, therefore the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a security camera captured a man wearing a clown mask fleeing the scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A security camera captured a man wearing a clown mask fleeing the scene
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a security camera captured a man wearing a clown mask fleeing the scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a security camera captured a man wearing a clown mask fleeing the scene, hence the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a security camera captured a man wearing a clown mask fleeing the scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A security camera captured a man wearing a clown mask fleeing the scene
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a security camera captured a man wearing a clown mask fleeing the scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a security camera captured a man wearing a clown mask fleeing the scene, thus the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a security camera captured a man wearing a clown mask fleeing the scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A security camera captured a man wearing a clown mask fleeing the scene
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a security camera captured a man wearing a clown mask fleeing the scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a security camera captured a man wearing a clown mask fleeing the scene, so it can be concluded that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a security camera captured a man wearing a clown mask fleeing the scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A security camera captured a man wearing a clown mask fleeing the scene
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a security camera captured a man wearing a clown mask fleeing the scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a security camera captured a man wearing a clown mask fleeing the scene, so the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a security camera captured a man wearing a clown mask fleeing the scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A security camera captured a man wearing a clown mask fleeing the scene
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.